Notebookcheck

Recensione del Lapbook Chuwi un 4K per $440

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 07/10/2019

Cosa potrebbe andare storto? Ha l'aspetto di un Ultrabook da 1000 dollari, ma con le prestazioni di un netbook da 100 dollari. C'è una buona ragione per cui non si vedono molti computer portatili Intel Atom con display 4K UHD sul mercato; sono una coppia squilibrata.

Chuwi LapBook Plus (LapBook Serie)
Processore
Intel Atom x7-E3950
Scheda grafica
Intel HD Graphics 505, Core: 500 MHz, DDR4, 26.20.100.6890
Memoria
8192 MB 
, 1200 MHz, 7-15-15-34, Dual-Channel
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, BOE NV156QUM-N51, IPS, BOE06F4, lucido: no
Harddisk
Kimtigo KT256GM28S3, 256 GB 
Scheda audio
RealTek ALC269 @ Intel Apollo Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, Connessioni Audio: 3.5 mm earphones, Lettore schede: Lettore MicroSD
Rete
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 15.9 x 362 x 242
Batteria
36 Wh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 2 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.53 kg, Alimentazione: 211 gr
Prezzo
439 USD
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

361 mm 250 mm 19.3 mm 2.2 kg361 mm 245 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg361 mm 243 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg362 mm 242 mm 15.9 mm 1.5 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg349.3 mm 240.7 mm 15.5 mm 1.8 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174 MB/s ∼100% +650%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
149.3 MB/s ∼86% +544%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.6 MB/s ∼21% +58%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
32.6 MB/s ∼19% +41%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC)
23.2 MB/s ∼13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
193.8 MB/s ∼100% +1119%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192 MB/s ∼99% +1108%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
35.6 MB/s ∼18% +124%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
34.6 MB/s ∼18% +118%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC)
15.9 MB/s ∼8%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 (min: 636, max: 689) MBit/s ∼100% +105%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼78% +59%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
330 MBit/s ∼49%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
294 (min: 161, max: 330) MBit/s ∼43% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
606 (min: 306, max: 655) MBit/s ∼100% +144%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼95% +132%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
562 (min: 507, max: 591) MBit/s ∼93% +127%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
248 MBit/s ∼41%
335.1
cd/m²
371.4
cd/m²
343.6
cd/m²
327.3
cd/m²
360.2
cd/m²
332.2
cd/m²
305.6
cd/m²
337.9
cd/m²
318.6
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
BOE NV156QUM-N51
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 371.4 cd/m² Media: 336.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.9 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 82 %
Al centro con la batteria: 360.2 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1092:1 (Nero: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.13 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 3.8
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
87.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Chuwi LapBook Plus
BOE NV156QUM-N51, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng
BOE080D, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
LQ156D1, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
APPA040, IPS, 15.4, 2880x1800
Response Times
-34%
-14%
-2%
4012%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (21.2, 18.8)
43 (22, 21)
-8%
46.4 (22.8, 23.6)
-16%
38.8 (20.8, 18)
3%
43.2 (20.4, 22.8)
-8%
Response Time Black / White *
25.2 (14, 11.2)
29 (16, 13)
-15%
32 (18, 14)
-27%
26.8 (16, 10.8)
-6%
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
-24%
PWM Frequency
961.5 (99)
208 (90)
-78%
980.4 (25)
2%
117000 (75, 150)
12068%
Screen
1%
5%
-13%
40%
Brightness middle
360.2
320
-11%
494
37%
262
-27%
520
44%
Brightness
337
293
-13%
457
36%
256
-24%
492
46%
Brightness Distribution
82
86
5%
88
7%
90
10%
88
7%
Black Level *
0.33
0.26
21%
0.34
-3%
0.21
36%
0.39
-18%
Contrast
1092
1231
13%
1453
33%
1248
14%
1333
22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.13
4.5
-9%
5.2
-26%
5.8
-40%
1.2
71%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.15
8.81
-8%
17.5
-115%
14.3
-75%
2.3
72%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.8
4.6
-21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
4.71
6%
2.7
46%
2.5
50%
1.3
74%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.45 90%
2.1 105%
1.99 111%
2.18 101%
CCT
7532 86%
7085 92%
7038 92%
6528 100%
6738 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57.3
58
1%
71.2
24%
36.6
-36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87.8
88
0%
98.8
13%
57.6
-34%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-17% / -7%
-5% / 1%
-8% / -12%
2026% / 1123%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
25.2 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 14 ms Incremento
↘ 11.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 44 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
40 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 21.2 ms Incremento
↘ 18.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 45 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (39.7 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 961.5 Hz ≤ 99 % settaggio luminosita'

Il display sfarfalla a 961.5 Hz (Probabilmente a causa dell'uso di PWM) Flickering rilevato ad una luminosita' di 99 % o inferiore. Non dovrebbe verificarsi flickering o PWM sopra questo valore di luminosita'.

La frequenza di 961.5 Hz è abbastanza alta, quindi la maggioranza degli utenti sensibili al PWM non dovrebbero notare alcun flickering.

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9409 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290Tooltip
Chuwi LapBook Plus HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø124 (124.01-124.67)
Teclast Tbook 16 Power HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750, 64 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø123 (120.92-124.88)
Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Netac SSD 256GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø198 (196.89-200.66)
Apple MacBook Air 2018 UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256; CPU Multi 64Bit; macOS: Ø277 (266.55-285.88)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Core i3-8145U
150 Points ∼69% +266%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
119 Points ∼55% +190%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
108 Points ∼50% +163%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE
Intel Celeron N4100
69 Points ∼32% +68%
Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019
Intel Core m3-6Y30
66 Points ∼30% +61%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
64 Points ∼29% +56%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel Atom x7-E3950
41 Points ∼19%
Chuwi Hi10 Air
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
30 Points ∼14% -27%
Chuwi HeroBook 14
Intel Atom x5-E8000
27 Points ∼12% -34%
HP x2 210 G1
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
26 Points ∼12% -37%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Core i3-8145U
361 Points ∼8% +189%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
258 Points ∼6% +106%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
234 Points ∼5% +87%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE
Intel Celeron N4100
208 Points ∼5% +66%
Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019
Intel Core m3-6Y30
198 Points ∼5% +58%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
180 Points ∼4% +44%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel Atom x7-E3950
125 Points ∼3%
Chuwi Hi10 Air
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
97 Points ∼2% -22%
HP x2 210 G1
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
93 Points ∼2% -26%
Chuwi HeroBook 14
Intel Atom x5-E8000
89 Points ∼2% -29%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Core i3-8145U
1.77 Points ∼73% +247%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
1.24 Points ∼51% +143%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
1.08 Points ∼44% +112%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
0.83 Points ∼34% +63%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel Atom x7-E3950
0.51 Points ∼21%
Asus Transformer Book T200TA PL
Intel Atom Z3775
0.4 Points ∼16% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Core i3-8145U
4.01 Points ∼9% +149%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
2.85 Points ∼6% +77%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
2.62 Points ∼6% +63%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
2.3 Points ∼5% +43%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel Atom x7-E3950
1.61 Points ∼4%
Asus Transformer Book T200TA PL
Intel Atom Z3775
1.49 Points ∼3% -7%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Core i3-8145U
5953 Points ∼55% +357%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
4071 Points ∼38% +212%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
2192 Points ∼20% +68%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE
Intel Celeron N4100
2013 Points ∼19% +54%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel Atom x7-E3950
1304 Points ∼12%
Asus Transformer Book T200TA PL
Intel Atom Z3775
1144 Points ∼11% -12%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
951 Points ∼9% -27%
Chuwi HeroBook 14
Intel Atom x5-E8000
910 Points ∼8% -30%
HP x2 210 G1
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
855 Points ∼8% -34%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Core i3-8145U
13074 Points ∼20% +247%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
8846 Points ∼14% +135%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE
Intel Celeron N4100
5904 Points ∼9% +57%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
4808 Points ∼7% +28%
Asus Transformer Book T200TA PL
Intel Atom Z3775
4014 Points ∼6% +7%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel Atom x7-E3950
3769 Points ∼6%
Chuwi HeroBook 14
Intel Atom x5-E8000
3219 Points ∼5% -15%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
2966 Points ∼5% -21%
HP x2 210 G1
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
2135 Points ∼3% -43%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Chuwi HeroBook 14
Intel Atom x5-E8000
1168.47 s * ∼14% -23%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel Atom x7-E3950
948.552 s * ∼11%
Asus Transformer Book T200TA PL
Intel Atom Z3775
762.061 s * ∼9% +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
698 s * ∼8% +26%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
507.427 s * ∼6% +47%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Core i3-8145U
463.891 s * ∼5% +51%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Chuwi HeroBook 14
Intel Atom x5-E8000
2248.78 Seconds * ∼10% -23%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel Atom x7-E3950
1822 Seconds * ∼8%
Asus Transformer Book T200TA PL
Intel Atom Z3775
1719.01 Seconds * ∼8% +6%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
977.893 Seconds * ∼4% +46%
Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019
Intel Core m3-6Y30
660.72 Seconds * ∼3% +64%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
640 Seconds * ∼3% +65%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Core i3-8145U
638.274 Seconds * ∼3% +65%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
2669
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
3769
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1304
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
9.78 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.61 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.51 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
16.79 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
125 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
41 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Media della classe Multimedia
  (1001 - 7161, n=95)
3721 Points ∼31% +272%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
3315 Points ∼28% +231%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256
1609 Points ∼13% +61%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3
1001 Points ∼8%
HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
605 Points ∼5% -40%
Productivity
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
6236 Points ∼64% +343%
Media della classe Multimedia
  (1407 - 8020, n=96)
6150 Points ∼63% +337%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256
3902 Points ∼40% +177%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3
1407 Points ∼15%
HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1121 Points ∼12% -20%
Essentials
Media della classe Multimedia
  (2891 - 9829, n=96)
7480 Points ∼68% +159%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
6710 Points ∼61% +132%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256
4504 Points ∼41% +56%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3
2891 Points ∼26%
HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2662 Points ∼24% -8%
Score
Media della classe Multimedia
  (1144 - 5469, n=96)
3942 Points ∼51% +245%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
3711 Points ∼48% +224%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256
2174 Points ∼28% +90%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3
1144 Points ∼15%
HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
872 Points ∼11% -24%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1371 punti
Aiuto
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Kimtigo KT256GM28S3
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng
Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
Chuwi HeroBook 14
SanDisk DF4064
AS SSD
263%
344%
111%
-65%
Copy Game MB/s
161.96
700.4
332%
556.84
244%
37.2
-77%
Copy Program MB/s
77.72
328.55
323%
332.51
328%
15.61
-80%
Copy ISO MB/s
464.9
1651.54
255%
810.24
74%
59.03
-87%
Score Total
479
1822
280%
2684
460%
921
92%
105
-78%
Score Write
195
649
233%
1127
478%
244
25%
28
-86%
Score Read
186
780
319%
1071
476%
452
143%
50
-73%
Access Time Write *
0.462
0.233
50%
0.057
88%
0.603
-31%
0.904
-96%
Access Time Read *
0.361
0.421
-17%
0.147
59%
0.365
-1%
0.408
-13%
4K-64 Write
137.71
461.38
235%
956.6
595%
173
26%
8.6
-94%
4K-64 Read
139.41
618.48
344%
845.02
506%
373.64
168%
27.59
-80%
4K Write
15.16
114.11
653%
92.75
512%
51.11
237%
10.77
-29%
4K Read
7.36
46.51
532%
24.62
235%
27.67
276%
9.33
27%
Seq Write
419.36
735.84
75%
773.05
84%
202.69
-52%
85.9
-80%
Seq Read
391.5
1152.69
194%
2017.79
415%
504.04
29%
127.87
-67%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Kimtigo KT256GM28S3
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 546.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 476.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 92.06 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 81.34 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 455.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 395.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 13.04 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 58.68 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4126 Points ∼18% +447%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1509 Points ∼7% +100%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y
1472 Points ∼7% +95%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
1239 Points ∼5% +64%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
1179 Points ∼5% +56%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8145U
1032 Points ∼5% +37%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1014 Points ∼4% +34%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
861 Points ∼4% +14%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950
754 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
558 Points ∼2% -26%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750
363 Points ∼2% -52%
Chuwi HeroBook 14
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), E8000
319 Points ∼1% -58%
Chuwi Hi10 Air
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350
318 Points ∼1% -58%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4506 Points ∼9% +489%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1881 Points ∼4% +146%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y
1572 Points ∼3% +105%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8145U
1415 Points ∼3% +85%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
1288 Points ∼3% +68%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
1251 Points ∼2% +64%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1186 Points ∼2% +55%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
1154 Points ∼2% +51%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950
765 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
608 Points ∼1% -21%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750
408 Points ∼1% -47%
Chuwi Hi10 Air
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350
278 Points ∼1% -64%
Chuwi HeroBook 14
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), E8000
247 Points ∼0% -68%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
18770 Points ∼10% +370%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
9769 Points ∼5% +144%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y
7231 Points ∼4% +81%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8145U
7152 Points ∼4% +79%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
6096 Points ∼3% +53%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
6078 Points ∼3% +52%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
5769 Points ∼3% +44%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
4033 Points ∼2% +1%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950
3997 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
3869 Points ∼2% -3%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750
1767 Points ∼1% -56%
Chuwi HeroBook 14
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), E8000
1594 Points ∼1% -60%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
31512 Points ∼4% +76%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
26331 Points ∼4% +47%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950
17895 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
11944 Points ∼2% -33%
3DMark 06 Standard
4884 punti
3DMark Vantage P Result
2744 punti
3DMark 11 Performance
835 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
23656 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
2880 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score
161 punti
Aiuto
basso medio alto ultra
Rocket League (2017) 21.415.3fps
Carico massimo
 46.2 °C34.2 °C30.4 °C 
 36.2 °C32.4 °C29.2 °C 
 33.6 °C30.8 °C29.8 °C 
Massima: 46.2 °C
Media: 33.6 °C
31 °C36 °C51 °C
30 °C35 °C38.8 °C
29.6 °C32 °C34.4 °C
Massima: 51 °C
Media: 35.3 °C
Alimentazione (max)  38 °C | Temperatura della stanza 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 33.6 °C / 92 F, rispetto alla media di 30.9 °C / 88 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Multimedia.
(-) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 46.2 °C / 115 F, rispetto alla media di 36.5 °C / 98 F, che varia da 21.1 a 71 °C per questa classe Multimedia.
(-) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 51 °C / 124 F, rispetto alla media di 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 28.3 °C / 83 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.143.22538.841.33137.836.74037.137.4503736.96335.835.78035.733.810034.833.212532.43316032.332.920031.634.725031.339.83153048.840029.956.450028.860.163028.459.480028.350.8100028.351125027.454.3160027.559.8200027.459.8250026.860.631502757.7400026.856.9500026.760.3630026.657.9800026.554.41000026.444.51250026.544.11600026.337SPL39.669.8N3.725.3median 27.5median 54.3Delta2.29.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseChuwi LapBook PlusApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Chuwi LapBook Plus analisi audio

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.8 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.34 / 0.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.6 / 11.3 / 11.7 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 21.1 / 20.2 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Chuwi LapBook Plus
x7-E3950, HD Graphics 505, Kimtigo KT256GM28S3, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng
8265U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G, IPS, 2736x1834, 12.3
Power Consumption
-40%
-205%
-51%
-141%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
6.6
4.9
26%
9.48
-44%
3.1
53%
2.1
68%
4.3
35%
Idle Average *
11.3
7.9
30%
16.1
-42%
6.3
44%
6.7
41%
8.7
23%
Idle Maximum *
11.7
10.1
14%
16.9
-44%
8.6
26%
11.4
3%
9.4
20%
Load Average *
21.1
60
-184%
90.8
-330%
56.4
-167%
77.7
-268%
24.5
-16%
Load Maximum *
20.2
38
-88%
134.4
-565%
62.7
-210%
131.5
-551%
36
-78%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3ore 31minuti
Chuwi LapBook Plus
x7-E3950, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng
8265U, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 84 Wh
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
8550U, GeForce MX150, 42 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
41%
173%
150%
84%
191%
Reader / Idle
480
1127
WiFi v1.3
211
297
41%
576
173%
528
150%
388
84%
614
191%
Load
79
76
135
Witcher 3 ultra
62
88

Pro

+ il telaio in lega di alluminio nasconde bene le impronte digitali
+ aspetto elegante soprattutto per il prezzo
+ tasti NumPad e frecce a grandezza naturale
+ esperienza di digitazione confortevole
+ pannello UHD 4K di alta qualità
+ sottile e leggero
+ due slot M.2 2280
+ completamente silenzioso
+ grande clickpad
+ economico

Contro

- lettore MicroSD molto lento; le schede MicroSD possono rimanere bloccate.
- qualità audio scadente; gli altoparlanti potrebbero essere più rumorosi
- prestazioni del sistema incredibilmente lente
- le cerniere sono deboli e tendono a scricchiolare
- clickpad difettoso sulla nostra unità di prova
- RAM non aggiornabile
- nessuna porta HDMI a grandezza naturale
- breve durata della batteria
- no USB Type-C
Recensione del Chuwi LapBook Plus. Modello di prova gentilmente fornito da Chuwi
Recensione del Chuwi LapBook Plus. Modello di prova gentilmente fornito da Chuwi

Per quanto sottile e sexy possa apparire, le prestazioni sono troppo lente da raccomandare il dispositivo per qualcosa di più di un semplice Print Server o stazione di posta elettronica. Anche le azioni più semplici come cliccare e digitare hanno notevoli ritardi e rendono questo LapBook Plus una scelta sbagliata per scopi multimediali, streaming o navigazione.

A giudizio di Chuwi, la tastiera è in realtà abbastanza buona rispetto ad altri Ultrabooks e il display 4K UHD non ha eguali in questa fascia di prezzo. Purtroppo, queste qualità rispettabili non sono di alcuna utilità pratica in quanto sono trascinati giù da uno dei processori più lenti che si possono trovare su qualsiasi computer portatile in uscita quest'anno.

    Un bel computer portatile intrappolato nel purgatorio di Intel Atom. Il processore molto lento trascina giù quello che avrebbe potuto essere un Ultrabook decente ed economico. Gli utenti farebbero meglio a scegliere un computer portatile Core i3 di ultima generazione per prestazioni più veloci e affidabili.

Chuwi LapBook Plus - 07/05/2019 v6(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
70 / 98 → 71%
Tastiera
92%
Dispositivo di puntamento
56%
Connettività
41 / 81 → 51%
Peso
69 / 20-67 → 100%
Batteria
72%
Display
87%
Prestazioni di gioco
51 / 85 → 60%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
45 / 92 → 49%
Temperatura
87%
Rumorosità
100 / 95 → 100%
Audio
30%
Fotocamera
21 / 85 → 25%
Media
63%
72%
Multimedia - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione del Lapbook Chuwi un 4K per $440
Allen Ngo, 2019-07-10 (Update: 2019-07-10)