Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Teclast Tbook 16 Power 2-in-1 (x7-Z8750, 8 GB)

Magnesio. Con il suo raro Atom x7-Z8750, 8 GB di RAM, ed Android 6 / Windows 10 con capacità dual-boot, il Teclast Tbook 16 Power si distingue dalla massa. Ma nel corso del test abbiamo riscontrato molti problemi.

Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Processore
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
Memoria
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3, single channel?, 8-10-11-23
Schermo
11.6 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 190 PPI, multitouch, supporto penna nativo, IPS, non laminato, lucido: si, schermo sganciabile
Scheda madre
Intel Cherry Trail
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 18.2 GB libera
Scheda audio
Intel SST Audio Device
Porte di connessione
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Connessioni Audio: cuffie, Lettore schede: MicroSD, Sensori: Kionix KXCJ9 accelerometro 3-assi SPB
Rete
Realtek RTL8723BS (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 10 x 303 x 179.5
Batteria
8500 mAh polimeri di litio, 3.8 / 8500mAh batteria a polimeri di litio, Autonomia della batteria (dichiarata dal produttore): 7 ore
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 5 MPix
Fotocamera Secondaria: 2 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, senza ventola
Rilasciata
11/16/2016
Peso
897 gr
Prezzo
287 Euro

 

Dual-boot menu
The display is not laminated, and there is a gap between the glass and the panel
Small touchpad means arduous usage
The kickstand is freely adjustable
The tablet can be charged via USB-C
Some external SSDs refused to work
White noise, only fixed through reboot
After a few hours, everything went back to normal

Size Comparison

Left to right: MicroSD (behind flap), mini-HDMI, Power, USB-C (3.0), USB-A (3.0), audio jack
Left to right: MicroSD (behind flap), mini-HDMI, Power, USB-C (3.0), USB-A (3.0), audio jack
SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10
78 MB/s ∼100% +11%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ
78 MB/s ∼100% +11%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
70 MB/s ∼90%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 256GB
68 MB/s ∼87% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
65.9 MB/s ∼84% -6%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
64 MB/s ∼82% -9%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA
32.9 MB/s ∼42% -53%
Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519)
29 MB/s ∼37% -59%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
501 MBit/s ∼100% +702%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)
459 MBit/s ∼92% +634%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Klaus I211)
357 MBit/s ∼71% +471%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Realtek RTL8723BS
62.5 MBit/s ∼12%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
802.11 b/g/n
40.6 MBit/s ∼8% -35%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)
593 MBit/s ∼100% +978%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
588 MBit/s ∼99% +969%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Klaus I211)
219 MBit/s ∼37% +298%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Realtek RTL8723BS
55 MBit/s ∼9%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
802.11 b/g/n
41.6 MBit/s ∼7% -24%
193
cd/m²
210
cd/m²
196
cd/m²
222
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
208
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
206
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 244 cd/m² Media: 215.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12.7 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 79 %
Al centro con la batteria: 244 cd/m²
Contrasto: 642:1 (Nero: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | - Ø
93% sRGB (Argyll) 60.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.15
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
1920x1080, 11.6
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Cube i9
KDC0000, , 1920x1200, 12.2
Chuwi Hi12
SEC3542, , 2160x1440, 12
Response Times
-17%
-23%
39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (20, 20)
48.4 (20.4, 28)
-21%
37.2 (16.4, 20.8)
7%
28 (11.6, 16.4)
30%
Response Time Black / White *
30.2 (16.8, 13.4)
35.6 (8, 27.6)
-18%
24 (9.2, 14.8)
21%
16 (5.2, 10.8)
47%
PWM Frequency
12000 (26, 60)
10420
-13%
200 (99, 255)
-98%
Screen
50%
20%
19%
Brightness
215
433
101%
263
22%
277
29%
Brightness Distribution
79
87
10%
77
-3%
89
13%
Black Level *
0.38
0.326
14%
0.28
26%
0.256
33%
Contrast
642
1340
109%
939
46%
1145
78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.7
1.82
73%
4.1
39%
5.2
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.4
1.44
81%
3.8
49%
8.5
-15%
Gamma
2.15 112%
2.1 114%
2.25 107%
2.21 109%
CCT
8867 73%
6560 99%
6433 101%
7048 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60.6
62.3
3%
57.7
-5%
62
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
97.5
5%
76.2
-18%
82.5
-11%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
17% / 31%
-2% / 8%
29% / 23%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
30.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms Incremento
↘ 13.4 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms Incremento
↘ 20 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 12000 Hz26 % brightness setting
60 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 12000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 26 % (60 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 12000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Core m3-6Y30
89 Points ∼100% +129%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points ∼99% +126%
Cube i9
Intel Core m3-6Y30
73 Points ∼82% +88%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
42 Points ∼47% +8%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
Intel Pentium N3710
41 Points ∼46% +5%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel Pentium N3710
41 Points ∼46% +5%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
39 Points ∼44% 0%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
38.9 Points ∼44%
Microsoft Surface 3
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
38 Points ∼43% -2%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
31 Points ∼35% -20%
VOYO VBook V3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
28 Points ∼31% -28%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
Intel Celeron N2910
27 Points ∼30% -31%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Core m3-6Y30
211 Points ∼100% +59%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points ∼98% +55%
Cube i9
Intel Core m3-6Y30
192 Points ∼91% +44%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel Pentium N3710
152 Points ∼72% +14%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
150 Points ∼71% +13%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
Intel Pentium N3710
141 Points ∼67% +6%
Microsoft Surface 3
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
134 Points ∼64% +1%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
133 (min: 112.75) Points ∼63%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
105 Points ∼50% -21%
Teclast Tbook 10s
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
101 Points ∼48% -24%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
99 Points ∼47% -26%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
Intel Celeron N2910
97 Points ∼46% -27%
VOYO VBook V3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
94 Points ∼45% -29%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
85 Points ∼40% -36%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
38.9 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
10.3 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
133 Points
Aiuto
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Cube i7 Book CDK09
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, FORESEE 64GB O1229B
2976 Points ∼100% +99%
Cube i9
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, FORESEE 128GB O1229B
2628 Points ∼88% +75%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points ∼82% +62%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2114 Points ∼71% +41%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256
1999 Points ∼67% +33%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710
1792 Points ∼60% +20%
Microsoft Surface 3
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1677 Points ∼56% +12%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
1651 Points ∼55% +10%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1499 Points ∼50%
VOYO VBook V3
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1352 Points ∼45% -10%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1315 Points ∼44% -12%
Medion Akoya E2215T
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1282 Points ∼43% -14%
Teclast Tbook 10s
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1088 Points ∼37% -27%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1499 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
1732 punti
Aiuto
Performance Rating
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
94.4 pt ∼94%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
68.2 pt ∼68%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
65.7 pt ∼66%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
22.9 pt ∼23%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
12.1 pt ∼12%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
11.3 pt ∼11%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
Write 4k QD32
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
149.2 MB/s ∼100% +7143%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
116 MB/s ∼78% +5531%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
96.18 MB/s ∼64% +4569%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
11.2 MB/s ∼8% +444%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
2.06 MB/s ∼1%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
1.775 MB/s ∼1% -14%
Read 4k QD32
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
243.7 MB/s ∼100% +2126%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
121.3 MB/s ∼50% +1008%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
27.94 MB/s ∼11% +155%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
22.7 MB/s ∼9% +107%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
10.95 MB/s ∼4%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
7.358 MB/s ∼3% -33%
Write 4k
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
68.02 MB/s ∼100% +3424%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
56.8 MB/s ∼84% +2843%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
51.25 MB/s ∼75% +2555%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
9.52 MB/s ∼14% +393%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
1.93 MB/s ∼3%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
1.504 MB/s ∼2% -22%
Read 4k
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
30.14 MB/s ∼100% +279%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
18.4 MB/s ∼61% +131%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
14.72 MB/s ∼49% +85%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
12.64 MB/s ∼42% +59%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
7.96 MB/s ∼26%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
6.615 MB/s ∼22% -17%
Write 512
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
199 MB/s ∼100% +648%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
158.2 MB/s ∼79% +495%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
130.7 MB/s ∼66% +391%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
39.9 MB/s ∼20% +50%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
26.61 MB/s ∼13%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
9.096 MB/s ∼5% -66%
Read 512
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
313.1 MB/s ∼100% +328%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
252.4 MB/s ∼81% +245%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
197 MB/s ∼63% +169%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
133.7 MB/s ∼43% +83%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
78.07 MB/s ∼25% +7%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
73.22 MB/s ∼23%
Write Seq
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
208 MB/s ∼100% +646%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
158.2 MB/s ∼76% +467%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
157 MB/s ∼75% +463%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
47.99 MB/s ∼23% +72%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
40.52 MB/s ∼19% +45%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
27.9 MB/s ∼13%
Read Seq
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
662.5 MB/s ∼100% +786%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
433.2 MB/s ∼65% +479%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
337 MB/s ∼51% +351%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
149.3 MB/s ∼23% +100%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
86.39 MB/s ∼13% +15%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
74.8 MB/s ∼11%
64 GB eMMC Flash
Sequential Read: 74.8 MB/s
Sequential Write: 27.9 MB/s
512K Read: 73.22 MB/s
512K Write: 26.61 MB/s
4K Read: 7.96 MB/s
4K Write: 1.93 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 10.95 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 2.06 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700
1413 Points ∼100% +246%
Cube i9
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
899 Points ∼64% +120%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
496 Points ∼35% +22%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
489 Points ∼35% +20%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
473 Points ∼33% +16%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
463 Points ∼33% +13%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8550
418 Points ∼30% +2%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750
408 Points ∼29%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060
382 Points ∼27% -6%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
298 Points ∼21% -27%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700
1022 Points ∼100%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
278 Points ∼27%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
231 Points ∼23%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700
6636 Points ∼100% +276%
Cube i9
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
5602 Points ∼84% +217%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
2831 Points ∼43% +60%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8550
2455 Points ∼37% +39%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
2329 Points ∼35% +32%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060
1907 Points ∼29% +8%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
1897 Points ∼29% +7%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750
1767 Points ∼27%
3DMark 06 Standard
2274 punti
3DMark 11 Performance
451 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
1743 punti
Aiuto
Farming Simulator 17 - 1280x720 Low Preset
Cube i9
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
48 (min: 42) fps ∼100% +173%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
31.3 fps ∼65% +78%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
22.6 (min: 21) fps ∼47% +28%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750
17.6 (min: 16) fps ∼37%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Cube i9
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
50.4 (min: 43) fps ∼100% +128%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
35.2 fps ∼70% +59%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750
22.1 (min: 19) fps ∼44%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
20 (min: 18) fps ∼40% -10%
World of Warships - 1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear
Cube i9
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
32 (min: 13) fps ∼100% +113%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
21.8 fps ∼68% +45%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750
15 (min: 4) fps ∼47%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
13.9 (min: 7) fps ∼43% -7%
basso medio alto ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 22.113.7fps
World of Warships (2015) 15fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 17.6fps
Rocket League (2017) 18.7fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 19.6fps
Carico massimo
 41 °C32 °C27 °C 
 43 °C32 °C27 °C 
 41 °C33 °C30 °C 
Massima: 43 °C
Media: 34 °C
28 °C32 °C35 °C
29 °C33 °C40 °C
29 °C33 °C38 °C
Massima: 40 °C
Media: 33 °C
Temperatura della stanza 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203735.52533.231.53130.831.94033.137.75031.732.56328.330.78028.527.410026.826.61252526.416025.22620023.82825022.332.831522.428.940021.925.850020.141.363020.151.18001955.9100018.662.5125018.462.6160017.958.5200017.452.1250017.454.6315017.455.7400017.461.5500017.563.5630017.557800017.642.41000017.537.41250017.537.71600017.529.3SPL30.570.6N1.523.4median 18.4Teclast Tbook 16 Powermedian 42.4Delta2.514.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Teclast Tbook 16 Power audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 13.2% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (26.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.2% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (22.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (53.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 100% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.215 / 2.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.6 / 2.7 / 2.7 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 12.7 / 13.1 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Z8750, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6
Chuwi Hi12
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Hynix HCG8E 64 GB, IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Cube i7 Book CDK09
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, FORESEE 64GB O1229B, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.6
Cube i9
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, FORESEE 128GB O1229B, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2
Microsoft Surface 3
Z8700, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1280, 10.8
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 14
Power Consumption
21%
-180%
-132%
-70%
-100%
Idle Minimum *
2.6
1.7
35%
6.6
-154%
4.6
-77%
2.5
4%
4.1
-58%
Idle Average *
2.7
1.7
37%
10
-270%
9.6
-256%
7
-159%
8.3
-207%
Idle Maximum *
2.7
3.3
-22%
12
-344%
9.6
-256%
8.4
-211%
8.6
-219%
Load Average *
12.7
7.9
38%
21.1
-66%
18.6
-46%
11.2
12%
13.5
-6%
Load Maximum *
13.1
10.8
18%
22
-68%
16.3
-24%
12.4
5%
14.5
-11%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
6ore 16minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7ore 06minuti
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
661 min ∼100% +76%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
533 min ∼81% +42%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
6Y30, HD Graphics 515
488 min ∼74% +30%
Chuwi Vi10 Ultimate 64GB
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
435 min ∼66% +16%
Chuwi Hi12
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
405 min ∼61% +8%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Z8750, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
376 min ∼57%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
364 min ∼55% -3%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
6Y30, HD Graphics 515
300 min ∼45% -20%
Cube i9
6Y30, HD Graphics 515
262 min ∼40% -30%
Teclast Tbook 10s
Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
228 min ∼34% -39%

Pro

+ high quality
+ raffreddamento silenzioso
+ USB-C alimentatat e DisplayPort

Contro

- problemi ad accedere a dispositivi USB(-C) esterni
- consumi elevati in idle
- caricatore non incluso
- spazio di archiviazione eMMC lento
- touchpad stretto
TBook 16 Power, affordable 2-in-1 convertible with some drawbacks
TBook 16 Power, affordable 2-in-1 convertible with some drawbacks

Il principale punto di forza del Teclast Tbook 16 Power è il suo veloce microprocessore Atom x7. Sebbene superi la concorrenza Atom x5, è risultato molto più lento dei concorrenti Core m3 e Pentium N3710.Specialmente con i giochi, l'Intel HD Graphics 405 è stata una grande delusione.

Un altro punto di forza è il sistema operativo Android 6. Nel breve periodo che abbiamo utilizzato il dispositivo, si è comportato molto bene e ha mostrato una certa fluidità. Sfortunatamente, l'opzione dual-boot è scomparsa dopo aver fatto un update di Windows, quindi non abbiamo potuto testarlo oltre.

Nel complesso, abbiamo rilevato diversi problemi grandi e piccoli. Una mattina il display non mostrava nulla tranne un disturbo bianco e abbiamo dovuto riavviare il dispositivo. Per qualche motivo le estremità restavano più luminose rispetto al resto del display un paio di ore dopo. L'assenza di un caricatore può far venire mal di testa, in quanto non hanno funzionato caricatori USB Apple né Inateck né Anker’s ci sono stati sempre problemi.  A volte non ricaricavano per nulla; altre si perdeva la connessione subito dopo che veniva completata la ricarica.

Le porte USB integrate non hanno funzionato secondo le attese, e non siamo stati in grado di usare un SSD esterno, come il Drive, l'Angelbird, o lo OCZ. Altri dispositivi, come un hard drive esterno o il SanDisk Extreme 900, hanno funzionato in modo impeccabile. Il nostro dubbio è che le porte USB non siano abbastanza potenti. Lo standby è stato un altro problema con il dispositivo. Oltre al consumo elevato in standby il tablet a volte restava acceso con lo schermo spento e con alcuni processi in background che caricavano la CPU assorbendo molta energia. Non siamo stati in grado di rilevare la causa; probabilmente un errore o un bug nei driver del dispositivo.

Oltre tutti questi problemi, il tablet ha un paio di pecche nel designo; fotocamere, casse e touchpad. In aggiunta, il dispositivo non è ancora disponibile in Europa a causa dell'assenza del certificato CE, e può essere solo importato dalla Cina in questo momento. Garanzia e supporto pertanto dipendono direttamente dal rivenditore, e prevedono dei costi di spedizione non indifferenti.

Tuttavia, ci sono anche alcuni aspetti positivi. Nonostante non sia adatto all'utilizzo all'aperto, il display non è troppo scuro. La rigidità del case è eccellente, ed offre una piacevole sensazione al tatto. Abbiamo apprezzato l'assenza di rumori (ventola), e il lettore MicroSD-card è relativamente veloce.

Abbiamo ricevuto il nostro dispositivo da Gearbest direttamente dalla Cina, dove attualmente costa circa $310. La keyboard dock costa altri $35 ed è, nonostante le sue pecche, sicuramente raccomandabile. 

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Teclast Tbook 16 Power - 05/15/2017 v6
Klaus Hinum

Chassis
82 / 98 → 84%
Tastiera
72%
Dispositivo di puntamento
83%
Connettività
40 / 80 → 50%
Peso
77 / 78 → 97%
Batteria
89%
Display
78%
Prestazioni di gioco
35 / 68 → 52%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
41 / 87 → 47%
Temperatura
90%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
38 / 91 → 41%
Fotocamera
26 / 85 → 31%
Punti aggiuntivi
-1%
Media
61%
79%
Convertible - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Teclast Tbook 16 Power 2-in-1 (x7-Z8750, 8 GB)
Klaus Hinum, 2017-05-24 (Update: 2017-05-24)