Recensione del Laptop Eluktronics Matrix RP-17: Prestazioni Core i9 senza il prezzo Core i9
Fotocamera Principale: 0.9 MPix
Punteggio | Data | Modello | Peso | Altezza | Dimensione | Risoluzione | Miglior Prezzo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84 % | 08/2020 | Eluktronics RP-17 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.6 kg | 30 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85 % | 07/2020 | MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.6 kg | 27.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87 % | 06/2020 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
83 % | 05/2020 | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.6 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85 % | 12/2019 | Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 27.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
82 % | 12/2019 | Aorus 17 YA i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 3.8 kg | 38 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones
SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Aorus 17 YA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eluktronics RP-17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Aorus 17 YA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eluktronics RP-17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 |

|
Distribuzione della luminosità: 91 %
Al centro con la batteria: 311.5 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1005:1 (Nero: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.13 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 2.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
91.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Eluktronics RP-17 BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 BOE NV173FHM-NX1, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 BOE HF N173FHM-N44, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | Aorus 17 YA AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 882% | 48% | -30% | 6% | 18% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 22.4 (10.8, 11.6) | 6.8 (3.4, 3.4) 70% | 5.6 (2.6, 3) 75% | 22.4 (11.6, 10.8) -0% | 17.6 (8.4, 9.2) 21% | 16 (8.4, 7.6) 29% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12 (7.2, 4.8) | 8.8 (4.4, 4.4) 27% | 9.6 (5.2, 4.4) 20% | 19.2 (9.6, 9.6) -60% | 12.8 (7.6, 5.2) -7% | 11.2 (6.4, 4.8) 7% |
PWM Frequency | 943.4 | 25000 (18) 2550% | 980.4 (99) 4% | |||
Screen | 19% | -11% | -26% | 11% | 29% | |
Brightness middle | 311.5 | 337.9 8% | 328 5% | 264.8 -15% | 314.2 1% | 253 -19% |
Brightness | 301 | 305 1% | 329 9% | 253 -16% | 307 2% | 252 -16% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 81 -11% | 78 -14% | 90 -1% | 92 1% | 93 2% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.29 6% | 0.35 -13% | 0.31 -0% | 0.26 16% | 0.2 35% |
Contrast | 1005 | 1165 16% | 937 -7% | 854 -15% | 1208 20% | 1265 26% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.13 | 2.18 47% | 4.74 -15% | 4.73 -15% | 3.15 24% | 1.14 72% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 7.32 | 3.9 47% | 8.99 -23% | 18.89 -158% | 5.4 26% | 2.01 73% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 2.93 | 0.69 76% | 2.12 28% | 4.64 -58% | 2.74 6% | 1.01 66% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 3.3 | 3.1 6% | 6.8 -106% | 1.4 58% | 2.6 21% | 1.12 66% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.07 106% | 2.2 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.31 95% | 2.43 91% |
CCT | 7157 91% | 6882 94% | 6446 101% | 6641 98% | 6928 94% | 6366 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.5 | 62 4% | 64.8 9% | 38.4 -35% | 59.6 0% | 66 11% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.6 | 98.2 7% | 98.6 8% | 59.3 -35% | 91.8 0% | 98 7% |
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio) | 451% /
204% | 19% /
-2% | -28% /
-27% | 9% /
10% | 24% /
28% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Tempi di risposta del Display
↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco | ||
---|---|---|
12 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato | ↗ 7.2 ms Incremento | |
↘ 4.8 ms Calo | ||
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi. In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 16 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore. Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono migliori rispettto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (24.3 ms). | ||
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio | ||
22.4 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato | ↗ 10.8 ms Incremento | |
↘ 11.6 ms Calo | ||
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi. In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 17 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore. Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono migliori rispettto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (38.5 ms). |
Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato | 943.4 Hz | ||
Il display sfarfalla a 943.4 Hz (Probabilmente a causa dell'uso di PWM) . La frequenza di 943.4 Hz è abbastanza alta, quindi la maggioranza degli utenti sensibili al PWM non dovrebbero notare alcun flickering. In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9704 (minimo: 5 - massimo: 151500) Hz è stata rilevata. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Media AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (1154 - 1207, n=17) | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Media AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (5920 - 8672, n=17) | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Media AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (10.8 - 14.1, n=16) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Media AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (28.6 - 95.8, n=14) | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Media AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (0.562 - 0.603, n=15) | |
Intel Core i9-10900K |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
PCMark 8 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Aorus 17 YA | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Media AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5742 - 5983, n=4) | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Aorus 17 YA | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
Media AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (4698 - 5197, n=4) | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4816 punti | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5742 punti | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5454 punti | |
Aiuto |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Eluktronics RP-17 Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD | MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Aorus 17 YA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 4% | -27% | -22% | -29% | -9% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1303.65 | 1418.64 9% | 1506.29 16% | 1263.5 -3% | 1327.7 2% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 578.92 | 205.48 -65% | 621.74 7% | 552.56 -5% | 564.17 -3% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2124.04 | 1900.16 -11% | 1714.9 -19% | 1736.07 -18% | 1612.15 -24% | |
Score Total | 4112 | 4863 18% | 2392 -42% | 2333 -43% | 2137 -48% | 3062 -26% |
Score Write | 2194 | 2045 -7% | 1034 -53% | 1132 -48% | 992 -55% | 1254 -43% |
Score Read | 1262 | 1865 48% | 913 -28% | 775 -39% | 730 -42% | 1232 -2% |
Access Time Write * | 0.102 | 0.09 12% | 0.167 -64% | 0.113 -11% | 0.127 -25% | 0.03 71% |
Access Time Read * | 0.04 | 0.049 -23% | 0.058 -45% | 0.043 -8% | 0.045 -13% | 0.052 -30% |
4K-64 Write | 1841.37 | 1734.24 -6% | 812.64 -56% | 819.84 -55% | 724.56 -61% | 978.73 -47% |
4K-64 Read | 1042.88 | 1600.88 54% | 664.71 -36% | 586.4 -44% | 583.09 -44% | 925.62 -11% |
4K Write | 182.93 | 127.15 -30% | 90.18 -51% | 158.51 -13% | 107.45 -41% | 118.88 -35% |
4K Read | 50.04 | 60.56 21% | 46.61 -7% | 56.27 12% | 42.9 -14% | 34.96 -30% |
Seq Write | 1694.54 | 1834.63 8% | 1314.33 -22% | 1538.61 -9% | 1604.22 -5% | 1561.35 -8% |
Seq Read | 1688.73 | 2036.44 21% | 2019.26 20% | 1319.58 -22% | 1037.88 -39% | 2715.87 61% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 4% | 7% | -6% | -12% | 8% | |
Write 4K | 226.1 | 139.2 -38% | 119 -47% | 189.7 -16% | 134 -41% | 139.6 -38% |
Read 4K | 54.74 | 53.03 -3% | 51.87 -5% | 62.25 14% | 55.45 1% | 62.89 15% |
Write Seq | 1868 | 1950 4% | 2258 21% | 1681 -10% | 1292 -31% | 1573 -16% |
Read Seq | 1648 | 2328 41% | 2283 39% | 1608 -2% | 1476 -10% | 2808 70% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 429.9 | 408.9 -5% | 491 14% | 468.6 9% | 545.4 27% | 509.3 18% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 521.2 | 550.9 6% | 539.7 4% | 540.6 4% | 581.9 12% | 639.3 23% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2248 | 1938 -14% | 2253 0% | 1770 -21% | 1746 -22% | 1573 -30% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2484 | 3467 40% | 3172 28% | 1898 -24% | 1793 -28% | 3082 24% |
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio) | 4% /
4% | -10% /
-15% | -14% /
-16% | -21% /
-23% | -1% /
-2% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 20068 punti | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39513 punti | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15584 punti | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6680 punti | |
Aiuto |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (52 - 66.1, n=6) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T |