Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile HP Pavilion 15 Power (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050)

Allen Ngo (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 07/07/2017

Power play. HP si spinge al limite per testare la potenza di un sistema Pavilion senza chiamarlo portatile gaming. Il Pavilion 15 Power è attualmente il migliore e più costoso della serie.

HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV (Pavilion 15 Serie)
Processore
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) - 2048 MB, Core: 1354 MHz, Memoria: 7008 MHz, GDDR5, 382.53, Optimus
Memoria
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 1300 MHz, Dual-Channel, 15-15-15-36
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel HM175
Harddisk
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, 256 GB 
, Secondario: 1 TB HGST HTS721010A9E630
Scheda audio
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Lettore schede: SD reader
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 24.1 x 378 x 252.2
Batteria
70 Wh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: B&O stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, HP CoolSense, 3D DriveGuard, B&O Play Audio control, 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2.358 kg, Alimentazione: 431 gr
Prezzo
1000 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio, Kensington Lock
Left: 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, USB Type-C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, HDMI-out, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter
Right: SD reader, USB Type-C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, HDMI-out, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
 
81.27 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
 
74.74 MB/s ∼92% -8%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
 
21.2 MB/s ∼26% -74%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
 
89.74 MB/s ∼100% +4%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
 
86.39 MB/s ∼96%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
 
17.9 MB/s ∼20% -79%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
645 MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
343 MBit/s ∼52% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
512 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
465 MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
341 MBit/s ∼67% -27%
238.2
cd/m²
228.5
cd/m²
219.5
cd/m²
240.8
cd/m²
256.6
cd/m²
226.5
cd/m²
249.3
cd/m²
270.5
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Massima: 270.5 cd/m² Media: 242.5 cd/m² Minimum: 17.58 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 81 %
Al centro con la batteria: 256.6 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1351:1 (Nero: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 36.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
Chi Mei CMN N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
BOE CQ NV156HFM-N42, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
15%
-41%
-20%
-10%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.8 (20, 18.8)
29.6 (15.6, 14)
24%
58.8 (33.6, 25.2)
-52%
46 (25, 21)
-19%
38.8 (20.8, 18)
-0%
44.4 (15.2, 29.2)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (16.4, 11.6)
26.4 (15.6, 10.8)
6%
36 (23.6, 12.4)
-29%
34 (20, 14)
-21%
33.6 (18.8, 14.8)
-20%
27.2 (6.8, 20.4)
3%
PWM Frequency
25510 (69)
21550 (99)
20000 (90)
19230 (99)
Screen
2%
-29%
2%
-28%
-31%
Brightness middle
256.6
300.9
17%
239
-7%
277
8%
255.9
0%
209.7
-18%
Brightness
243
285
17%
244
0%
268
10%
249
2%
193
-21%
Brightness Distribution
81
92
14%
88
9%
91
12%
90
11%
75
-7%
Black Level *
0.19
0.24
-26%
0.35
-84%
0.26
-37%
0.48
-153%
0.19
-0%
Contrast
1351
1254
-7%
683
-49%
1065
-21%
533
-61%
1104
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5
5
-0%
7.3
-46%
5.05
-1%
5.9
-18%
7.8
-56%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
20.1
10.2
49%
24.7
-23%
8.93
56%
18.9
6%
24.1
-20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
7
-159%
4.9
-81%
2.97
-10%
5.6
-107%
7.3
-170%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.34 94%
2.19 100%
2.39 92%
2.21 100%
2.39 92%
CCT
6599 98%
6578 99%
7332 89%
6466 101%
7250 90%
5771 113%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.7
59
61%
35
-5%
38
4%
44.8
22%
39.3
7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.7
90
56%
55
-5%
59
2%
70.1
21%
56.5
-2%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
9% / 4%
-35% / -31%
-9% / -1%
-19% / -25%
-19% / -26%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms Incremento
↘ 11.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms Incremento
↘ 18.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8801 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼92% +26%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼78% +7%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼73%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
143 Points ∼69% -5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼65% -11%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
133 Points ∼64% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
125 Points ∼60% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼29% +21%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼24% 0%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points ∼24%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
682 Points ∼22% -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼22% -8%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
503 Points ∼16% -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
490 Points ∼16% -34%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼94% +19%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points ∼79%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼78% -1%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.66 Points ∼71% -10%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.51 Points ∼65% -18%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼64% -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.46 Points ∼62% -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼36% +20%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.19 Points ∼30% 0%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼30%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.53 Points ∼28% -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼28% -8%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.81 Points ∼21% -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
5.29 Points ∼20% -35%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼67% +22%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5933 Points ∼55%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5923 Points ∼55% 0%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5449 Points ∼50% -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5126 Points ∼47% -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
4999 Points ∼46% -16%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
4920 Points ∼45% -17%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% +28%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22434 Points ∼45% +2%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22053 Points ∼44%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points ∼40% -9%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
18785 Points ∼38% -15%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17618 Points ∼35% -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
14329 Points ∼29% -35%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
323 s * ∼4% -52%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
211.948 s * ∼3%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
210.067 s * ∼2% +1%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% +17%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
569.349 Seconds * ∼3% -6%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
561.953 Seconds * ∼2% -5%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
535.187 Seconds * ∼2%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +18%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6839
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22053
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5933
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
66.78 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.15 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.84 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
102.39 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
740 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
151 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
5305 Points ∼81% +7%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4964 Points ∼76%
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4771 Points ∼73% -4%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
5362 Points ∼56% +1%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
5328 Points ∼56%
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4698 Points ∼49% -12%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4042 Points ∼66%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
4001 Points ∼66% -1%
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3670 Points ∼60% -9%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4042 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5328 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4964 punti
Aiuto
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Hynix HFS128G39TND
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
AS SSD
-103%
289%
1%
145%
Copy Game MB/s
204.33
1114.88
446%
157.55
-23%
240.51
18%
Copy Program MB/s
176.62
501.56
184%
111.13
-37%
299.45
70%
Copy ISO MB/s
297.32
1912.43
543%
194.96
-34%
1559.86
425%
Score Total
828
942
14%
2617
216%
882
7%
1592
92%
Score Write
210
48
-77%
807
284%
218
4%
376
79%
Score Read
416
646
55%
1232
196%
444
7%
852
105%
Access Time Write *
0.252
4.15
-1547%
0.027
89%
0.261
-4%
0.031
88%
Access Time Read *
0.12
0.08
33%
0.065
46%
0.077
36%
0.066
45%
4K-64 Write
130.69
15.3
-88%
528.56
304%
113.93
-13%
176.44
35%
4K-64 Read
338.75
371.6
10%
918.74
171%
361.43
7%
563.62
66%
4K Write
66.48
1.2
-98%
139.45
110%
90.81
37%
124.14
87%
4K Read
25.83
47.1
82%
48.57
88%
32.29
25%
44.75
73%
Seq Write
132.3
311.7
136%
1391.66
952%
130.17
-2%
751.8
468%
Seq Read
509.34
2276.6
347%
2648.88
420%
506.8
0%
2433.42
378%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Sequential Read: 491.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 141.7 MB/s
512K Read: 345.6 MB/s
512K Write: 142.6 MB/s
4K Read: 18.83 MB/s
4K Write: 76.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 348.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 104.8 MB/s
3DMark
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
8626 Points ∼43% +228%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK
5862 Points ∼30% +123%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
3662 Points ∼18% +39%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
3517 Points ∼18% +34%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
2685 Points ∼14% +2%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
2629 Points ∼13%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
1988 Points ∼10% -24%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
1657 Points ∼8% -37%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
18373 Points ∼45% +206%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK
12298 Points ∼30% +105%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
7682 Points ∼19% +28%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7321 Points ∼18% +22%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6002 Points ∼15%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
5990 Points ∼15% 0%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% -31%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
3574 Points ∼9% -40%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
10081 Points ∼57% +37%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7952 Points ∼45% +8%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7440 Points ∼42% +1%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7371 Points ∼42%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼25% -39%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4113 Points ∼23% -44%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
23170 Points ∼45% +207%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9824 Points ∼19% +30%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7760 Points ∼15% +3%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7537 Points ∼15%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% -36%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4251 Points ∼8% -44%
3DMark 11 Performance
7467 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
114747 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20367 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5451 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
2630 punti
Aiuto
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
65 fps ∼100% +98%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps ∼66% +30%
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
40.7 (min: 37, max: 45) fps ∼63% +24%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB
GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
36.9 (min: 34, max: 40) fps ∼57% +12%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
32.9 fps ∼51%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
30.6 fps ∼47% -7%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.2 fps ∼37% -26%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
16.32 (min: 14, max: 19) fps ∼25% -50%
basso medio alto ultra
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 43.3fps
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) 114fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 63.1fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 78.943.6fps
Thief (2014) 73.841.4fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 6940.221fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 897844fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60606048.2fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 94.9fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 41.833.7fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 38.432.9fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 54.338.733.8fps
Doom (2016) 103.681.538.435.3fps
Overwatch (2016) 92.255.5fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 40.627.8fps
Prey (2017) 14483.360.749.9fps
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142Tooltip
The Witcher 3 high

Rumorosità

Idle
32.1 / 32.2 / 32.2 dB(A)
Sotto carico
43.3 / 49.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 27.8 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Noise
9%
7%
3%
1%
off / environment *
27.8
28.2
-1%
27.7
-0%
28.1
-1%
28.9
-4%
Idle Minimum *
32.1
28.2
12%
30.5
5%
28.1
12%
32.3
-1%
Idle Average *
32.2
28.2
12%
30.5
5%
29.1
10%
32.3
-0%
Idle Maximum *
32.2
28.2
12%
30.6
5%
29.1
10%
32.3
-0%
Load Average *
43.3
39
10%
40
8%
49.2
-14%
43.2
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45
40
11%
Load Maximum *
49.6
46.3
7%
42.6
14%
49.2
1%
45.2
9%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 30 °C44 °C44.2 °C 
 28 °C34.2 °C44.6 °C 
 26 °C26.4 °C41 °C 
Massima: 44.6 °C
Media: 35.4 °C
47 °C60 °C37 °C
48.6 °C45.8 °C32.8 °C
50.6 °C31.4 °C28.2 °C
Massima: 60 °C
Media: 42.4 °C
Alimentazione (max)  50 °C | Temperatura della stanza 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.9402536.3373136.736.34034.835.35034.936.36336.4338033.532.610031.831.412530.130.216030.533.720029.643.825028.850.831528.154.140027.355.85002857.263028.359.780025.861.9100025.763.9125025.366.4160025.668.5200024.459.8250024.867.1315024.261.3400024.259.5500024.262.7630024.161.2800023.958.31000023.854.11250023.853.11600023.949.4SPL37.475.5N334.6median 25.6HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AVmedian 58.3Delta26.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.52 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.54 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9.4 / 9.7 / 16.8 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 76.5 / 105.6 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
7%
4%
-30%
12%
Idle Minimum *
9.4
6.7
29%
8.5
10%
11.1
-18%
5.3
44%
Idle Average *
9.7
8.9
8%
9.1
6%
14.1
-45%
10.6
-9%
Idle Maximum *
16.8
10.8
36%
9.7
42%
18.4
-10%
11.8
30%
Load Average *
76.5
81.8
-7%
79.9
-4%
96.5
-26%
70.9
7%
Load Maximum *
105.6
122.7
-16%
121.5
-15%
159.5
-51%
119.8
-13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
86.5
92.2
-7%
97.7
-13%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
16ore 11minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8ore 01minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
1ore 50minuti
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 70 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 72 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 45 Wh
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 52.5 Wh
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 43 Wh
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 63.3 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
-1%
-52%
-31%
-38%
-5%
Reader / Idle
971
1066
10%
509
-48%
612
-37%
961
-1%
WiFi v1.3
481
484
1%
240
-50%
330
-31%
263
-45%
389
-19%
Load
110
96
-13%
46
-58%
76
-31%
115
5%

Pro

+ opzioni grafiche AMD RX 550 e GTX 1050
+ spazio interno di archiviazione dual; supporto NVMe
+ touchscreen 1080p ed opzioni 4K UHD
+ chassis più robusto; design migliorato
+ elevate prestazioni gaming
+ nessun CPU throttling evidente
+ autonomia rispettabile

Contro

- temperature non omogenee della superficie; poggiapolsi caldi
- la cover potrebbe essere più rigida; ci sono un po' di oscillazioni
- le ventole sono sempre attive; rumoroso sotto carico
- mancano Thunderbolt 3 o DisplayPort
- casse interne mediocri
- manutenzione difficile
- gamma di colore limitata
- clickpad spugnoso
Recensione: HP Pavilion 15 Power (15t-cb000). Modello fornito da CUKUSA.com
Recensione: HP Pavilion 15 Power (15t-cb000). Modello fornito da CUKUSA.com

Il Pavilion 15 Power è il più potente e raccomandabile portatile rispetto al Pavilion 15 standard se si desiderano opzioni di CPUs HQ-class e grafica Pascal. Lo chassis è un evidente update ed anche la digitazione è più comoda e la retroilluminazione è più luminosa per una esperienza complessivamente migliore. Gli acquirenti dovrebbero prestare attenzione alla rigidità limitate del display, alla manutenzione difficile, e alla gamma di colore limitata che sconsigliano l'utilizzo per lavori di editing.

Il prezzo è il principale problema per il Pavilion 15 Power. L'XPS 15 9560 resta il portatile da 15" da battere se se si considerano simili le configurazioni tra i due sistemi (7700HQ, GTX 1050, FHD. 1 TB HDD, 8 GB RAM), l'XPS 15 attualmente costa $1200 USD rispetto ai $1040 USD per il Pavilion su HP.com (o $920 USD tramite Cukusa.com). La differenza di $200 o $300 sono giustificati dal fatto che il Dell è nettamente superiore al Pavilion 15 Power per portabilità, connettività, qualità del display, manutenzione, rigidità dello chassis. Potrebbe scaldarsi di più ed essere leggermente più rumoroso, ma i pochi svantaggi sono facilmente superati dai benefici. Se il budget è limitato, tuttavia, conviene optare per il Pavilion 15t rispetto al Pavilion 15 Power.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV - 07/03/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Chassis
67 / 98 → 68%
Tastiera
79%
Dispositivo di puntamento
71%
Connettività
52 / 81 → 64%
Peso
61 / 20-67 → 87%
Batteria
90%
Display
82%
Prestazioni di gioco
89 / 85 → 100%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
91 / 92 → 99%
Temperatura
83%
Rumorosità
75 / 95 → 79%
Audio
63%
Fotocamera
48 / 85 → 56%
Media
73%
82%
Multimedia - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile HP Pavilion 15 Power (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050)
Allen Ngo, 2017-07- 7 (Update: 2017-07- 7)