Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 (A10-9620P, HD)

Bernie Pechlaner, 07/18/2017

Nulla di nuovo. L'HP Pavilion 15z è un portatile da 15.6" abbastanza basilare con una APU AMD ed una scheda grafica integrata Radeon. Considerando il prezzo, non sorprende che il dispositivo pecchi in varie categorie.

HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 (Pavilion 15 Serie)
Processore
AMD A10-9620P
Scheda grafica
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo), 21.19.414.1280
Memoria
8192 MB 
, DDR4 PC4-19200
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 1366x768 pixel 100 PPI, no, BOE06A4, TN LED
Scheda madre
AMD CZ FCH
Scheda audio
ATI/AMD Kaveri - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: 3.5 mm audio-combo jack, Lettore schede: multi-format SD media card reader, Sensore luminosità
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 23.9 x 380 x 253.8
Batteria
31 Wh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1280x720
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: no, 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.898 kg, Alimentazione: 264 gr

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
62.5 MB/s ∼100% +145%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
57.3 MB/s ∼92% +124%
HP 15-ba077ng
27.2 MB/s ∼44% +6%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
25.54 MB/s ∼41%
Asus X555DA-BB11
24.9 MB/s ∼40% -3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
23.2 MB/s ∼37% -9%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
83.15 MB/s ∼100% +145%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
81.71 MB/s ∼98% +141%
HP 15-ba077ng
38.3 MB/s ∼46% +13%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
33.94 MB/s ∼41%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
27.5 MB/s ∼33% -19%
Asus X555DA-BB11
26.8 MB/s ∼32% -21%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
495 MBit/s ∼100% +20%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
412 MBit/s ∼83%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
350 MBit/s ∼71% -15%
Asus X555DA-BB11
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
341 MBit/s ∼69% -17%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
333 MBit/s ∼67% -19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
434 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
403 MBit/s ∼93%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
346 MBit/s ∼80% -14%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
319 MBit/s ∼74% -21%
Asus X555DA-BB11
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
197 MBit/s ∼45% -51%
257.5
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
243.8
cd/m²
250.2
cd/m²
251.3
cd/m²
229.8
cd/m²
249.1
cd/m²
232
cd/m²
214.8
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 257.5 cd/m² Media: 242.8 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 83 %
Al centro con la batteria: 251.3 cd/m²
Contrasto: 524:1 (Nero: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 11.7 | - Ø
56.8% sRGB (Argyll) 39.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.05
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
BOE06A4, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
Asus X555DA-BB11
TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
BOE NT15N41, TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Chi Mei CMN15C4 / N156HGE-EAB, TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
AUO B156HAN04.4, IPS LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL
15.6, 1366x768
Response Times
-2%
17%
4806%
-12%
-14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.6 (14.8, 26.8)
42 (23.6, 18.4)
-1%
43 (18, 25)
-3%
42.4 (22, 20.4)
-2%
44.8 (16.4, 28.4)
-8%
58 (36, 22)
-39%
Response Time Black / White *
22 (16, 6)
22.4 (14.4, 8)
-2%
14 (6, 8)
36%
14.6 (9.4, 5.2)
34%
25.6 (6.8, 18.8)
-16%
23 (17, 6)
-5%
PWM Frequency
198.4 (99)
28740
14386%
200 (90)
1%
Screen
11%
-12%
-4%
32%
7%
Brightness
243
232
-5%
144
-41%
201
-17%
243
0%
246
1%
Brightness Distribution
83
88
6%
90
8%
75
-10%
75
-10%
86
4%
Black Level *
0.48
0.52
-8%
0.49
-2%
0.46
4%
0.24
50%
0.43
10%
Contrast
524
467
-11%
296
-44%
487
-7%
1008
92%
588
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.9
4.9
51%
9.27
6%
10.5
-6%
4.65
53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.7
2.7
77%
12.28
-5%
11.23
4%
3.39
71%
Gamma
2.05 117%
2.34 103%
2.03 118%
2.12 113%
2.7 89%
CCT
11713 55%
6876 95%
10732 61%
11096 59%
6246 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39.17
33.5
-14%
35
-11%
38
-3%
36.69
-6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56.8
52.5
-8%
55
-3%
59
4%
57.66
2%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
5% / 9%
3% / -6%
2401% / 1308%
10% / 23%
-4% / -2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms Incremento
↘ 6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms Incremento
↘ 26.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 198.4 Hz99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 55 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9304 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 247500) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
CineBench R10 32-bit
CineBench R10 32-bit
CineBench R11.5 64-bit
CineBench R11.5 64-bit
CineBench R15
CineBench R15
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
142 Points ∼19% +97%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼18% +79%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
80 Points ∼11% +11%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD A12-9700P
78 Points ∼11% +8%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
72 Points ∼10%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
64 Points ∼9% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points ∼16% +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼15% +43%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
230 Points ∼11%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD A12-9700P
229 Points ∼11% 0%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
222 Points ∼10% -3%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
180 Points ∼8% -22%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.66 Points ∼20% +105%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
0.94 Points ∼12% +16%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
0.83 Points ∼10% +2%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
0.81 Points ∼10%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD A12-9700P
0.76 Points ∼9% -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.75 Points ∼16% +41%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
2.66 Points ∼11%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
2.62 Points ∼11% -2%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
2.3 Points ∼10% -14%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD A12-9700P
1.92 Points ∼8% -28%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
5624 Points ∼63% +147%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
2596 Points ∼29% +14%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
2277 Points ∼26%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD A12-9700P
2262 Points ∼25% -1%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
2192 Points ∼25% -4%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Intel Core i7-7500U
12161 Points ∼24% +64%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
7420 Points ∼15%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD A12-9700P
7188 Points ∼14% -3%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD A12-9700P
5148 Points ∼10% -31%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
4808 Points ∼10% -35%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
507.427 s * ∼6% -8%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
470.94 s * ∼6%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD A12-9700P
979.76 Seconds * ∼4% -0%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD A10-8700P
977.893 Seconds * ∼4% -0%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
977.05 Seconds * ∼4%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4880
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
7420
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
2277
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
20 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.66 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.81 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
25.12 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
230 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
72 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Radeon R7 M445, 7500U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
5033 Points ∼77% +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
4666 Points ∼72% +27%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3844 Points ∼59% +5%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
3669 Points ∼56%
Asus X555DA-BB11
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
3246 Points ∼50% -12%
HP 15-ba077ng
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
2773 Points ∼43% -24%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Radeon R7 M445, 7500U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
4862 Points ∼52% +58%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
3075 Points ∼33%
Asus X555DA-BB11
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
2856 Points ∼31% -7%
HP 15-ba077ng
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
2413 Points ∼26% -22%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Radeon R7 M445, 7500U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
3978 Points ∼67% +52%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
3550 Points ∼59% +35%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P, Liteonit CV3-8D128
2847 Points ∼48% +8%
HP 15-ba077ng
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
2777 Points ∼46% +6%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
2624 Points ∼44%
Asus X555DA-BB11
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
2335 Points ∼39% -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2624 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3075 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3669 punti
Aiuto
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Asus X555DA-BB11
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
HP 15-ba077ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-26%
6943%
4243%
4443%
11268%
Write 4k QD32
1.242
0.682
-45%
239.6
19191%
138
11011%
143.2
11430%
319.2
25600%
Read 4k QD32
1.234
0.694
-44%
285.2
23012%
143.1
11496%
171.6
13806%
529.5
42809%
Write 4k
1.212
0.636
-48%
55.87
4510%
62.68
5072%
44.94
3608%
123.4
10082%
Read 4k
0.436
0.373
-14%
29.25
6609%
20.99
4714%
23.76
5350%
34.3
7767%
Write 512
56.25
35.39
-37%
385.7
586%
283.1
403%
185.8
230%
414
636%
Read 512
36.88
32.28
-12%
382.8
938%
333.4
804%
295.9
702%
759
1958%
Write Seq
104.6
97.48
-7%
458.1
338%
243.3
133%
311.8
198%
468.1
348%
Read Seq
109.6
106.9
-2%
502.2
358%
447.4
308%
348.6
218%
1140
940%
Valore Minimo di trasferimento: 44.4 MB/s
Valore Massimo di trasferimento: 111.4 MB/s
Valore Medio di trasferimento: 80.4 MB/s
Tempi di accesso: 19.9 ms
Burst Rate: 68.4 MB/s
Utilizzo CPU: 4.4 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4250 Points ∼27% +291%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
AMD Radeon R7 M445, 7500U
2493 Points ∼16% +129%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P
1283 Points ∼8% +18%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
1087 Points ∼7%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
861 Points ∼5% -21%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4243 Points ∼8% +148%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P
3811 Points ∼7% +123%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
AMD Radeon R7 M445, 7500U
2208 Points ∼4% +29%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
1711 Points ∼3%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
1288 Points ∼3% -25%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
3545 Points ∼9% +254%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P
2090 Points ∼5% +109%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
AMD Radeon R7 M445, 7500U
1579 Points ∼4% +58%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
1001 Points ∼2%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
764 Points ∼2% -24%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
21835 Points ∼13% +276%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P
12140 Points ∼7% +109%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
AMD Radeon R7 M445, 7500U
9617 Points ∼6% +66%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
5804 Points ∼4%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
4033 Points ∼2% -31%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
AMD Radeon R7 M445, 7500U
43492 Points ∼6% +32%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
33003 Points ∼5%
Asus X555DA-BB11
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
26331 Points ∼4% -20%
3DMark 11 Performance
1686 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
37793 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4365 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
898 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
464 punti
Aiuto
BioShock Infinite
1366x768 High Preset (ordina per valore)
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
21.8 fps ∼7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Radeon R7 M445, 7500U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
44.5 (min: 8.7) fps ∼14% +104%
HP 15-ba077ng
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
32.6 fps ∼11% +50%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
86.79 fps ∼28% +298%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
16.6 fps ∼5% -24%
1366x768 Medium Preset (ordina per valore)
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
28.7 fps ∼9%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Radeon R7 M445, 7500U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
53.9 (min: 14.5) fps ∼17% +88%
HP 15-ba077ng
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
37.8 fps ∼12% +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
95.39 fps ∼30% +232%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
20.1 fps ∼6% -30%
1280x720 Very Low Preset (ordina per valore)
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
45.9 fps ∼13%
Asus X555DA-BB11
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
36.3 fps ∼10% -21%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Radeon R7 M445, 7500U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
98.7 (min: 17.5) fps ∼27% +115%
HP 15-ba077ng
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
60.9 fps ∼17% +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
138.13 fps ∼38% +201%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
35.6 fps ∼10% -22%
basso medio alto ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 51.829.121.3fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 45.928.721.8fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 1912.2fps

Rumorosità

Idle
31 / 31.2 / 31.3 dB(A)
Sotto carico
34.4 / 38.9 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1 (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 28.3 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P
Asus X555DA-BB11
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
Radeon R7 M445, 7500U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
HP 15-ba077ng
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P, Liteonit CV3-8D128
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
Noise
0%
-5%
2%
1%
3%
4%
3%
off / environment *
28.3
28.9
-2%
30.6
-8%
30.6
-8%
30.5
-8%
29
-2%
30.4
-7%
30.5
-8%
Idle Minimum *
31
31.6
-2%
30.6
1%
31.5
-2%
31.4
-1%
29
6%
30.9
-0%
30.8
1%
Idle Average *
31.2
32
-3%
30.6
2%
31.8
-2%
31.4
-1%
29
7%
30.9
1%
30.8
1%
Idle Maximum *
31.3
32.4
-4%
30.6
2%
31.8
-2%
31.9
-2%
29
7%
31
1%
30.8
2%
Load Average *
34.4
33.3
3%
41.9
-22%
31.4
9%
33.7
2%
34.3
-0%
31.8
8%
32.1
7%
Load Maximum *
38.9
35.5
9%
41.8
-7%
33.4
14%
33.8
13%
40.1
-3%
31.9
18%
33.8
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
40.6

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 38 °C25.4 °C23.8 °C 
 37.4 °C30 °C24 °C 
 36 °C32.2 °C28 °C 
Massima: 38 °C
Media: 30.5 °C
22.2 °C23 °C40.8 °C
23 °C25.2 °C38.6 °C
27.2 °C26 °C35.6 °C
Massima: 40.8 °C
Media: 29.1 °C
Alimentazione (max)  43.8 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.5 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs20039.440.825033.93631036.435.240031.935.650031.633.663032.33480031.933.2100031.230.8125033.132.816002935.7200028.149.1250027.661.6315026.965.3400026.260.1500025.557.7630024.863.1800025.465.6100002559.51250024.662.51600023.962.72000023.255.82500023.462.73150023.262.74000022.962.45000022.858.86300022.862.88000022.668.510000022.565.112500022.562.316000022.763.6SPL7536.175N37.62.737.6median 24.6HP Pavilion 15z-bw000median 62.4Delta2.14.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.16 / 0.9 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.38 / 7.9 / 8.98 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 34.74 / 42.41 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
A10-9620P, Radeon R5 (Carrizo), , TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Asus X555DA-BB11
A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
7500U, Radeon R7 M445, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP 15-ba077ng
A12-9700P, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
A12-9700P, Radeon R8 M445DX, Liteonit CV3-8D128, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
-21%
-4%
14%
-37%
-4%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
5.38
8.3
-54%
4
26%
4.4
18%
7.2
-34%
2.8
48%
5.3
1%
Idle Average *
7.9
8.6
-9%
5.4
32%
6.8
14%
10.3
-30%
6.3
20%
10.1
-28%
Idle Maximum *
8.98
13.1
-46%
8.3
8%
8.9
1%
11.9
-33%
6.9
23%
10.5
-17%
Load Average *
34.74
31.2
10%
54
-55%
30.9
11%
48.2
-39%
51.6
-49%
34.3
1%
Load Maximum *
42.41
43.9
-4%
55.4
-31%
31
27%
63
-49%
69.7
-64%
37
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51.8

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
6ore 21minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
3ore 42minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
1ore 04minuti
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
A10-9620P, Radeon R5 (Carrizo), 31 Wh
Asus X555DA-BB11
A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 37 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753
7500U, Radeon R7 M445, 42 Wh
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
A12-9700P, Radeon R8 M445DX, 40 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
2%
53%
-1%
114%
44%
Reader / Idle
381
435
14%
466
22%
358
-6%
883
132%
WiFi v1.3
222
176
-21%
417
88%
257
16%
462
108%
320
44%
Load
64
72
13%
95
48%
55
-14%
129
102%

Pro

+ leggero
+ display abbastanza luminoso
+ buone prestazioni GPU
+ manutenzione non difficile
+ decenti dispositivi di input

Contro

- completamente in plastica
- display TN sbiadito con angoli di visuale mediocri
- PWM anche al luminosità del 99%
- definizione e risoluzione basse
- autonomia
- prestazioni ridotte con la batteria
Recensione: HP Pavilion 15z-bw000. Modello di test fornito da Computer Upgrade King
Recensione: HP Pavilion 15z-bw000. Modello di test fornito da Computer Upgrade King

Il Pavilion 15z è un portatile leggero, discreto ma entry-level da 15.6". Il processore AMD APU non si avvicina nemmeno alle attuali generazioni di CPUs Intel ULV, sebbene la Radeon R5 iGP offra prestazioni decenti per gestire almeno qualche gioco datato con settaggi bassi.

Il sistema è rallentato da un lento hard drive, il display HD TN ha angoli di visuale limitati e la batteria ha poca autonomia. 

Con tanti modelli entry-level, sarà difficile per l'HP Pavilion 15z - emergere dalla massa.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

 

 

HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 - 07/15/2017 v6
Bernie Pechlaner

Chassis
63 / 98 → 64%
Tastiera
77%
Dispositivo di puntamento
78%
Connettività
45 / 81 → 55%
Peso
64 / 67 → 94%
Batteria
73%
Display
69%
Prestazioni di gioco
56 / 85 → 66%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
56 / 92 → 61%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
91 / 95 → 96%
Audio
56%
Fotocamera
45 / 85 → 53%
Media
67%
72%
Multimedia - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 (A10-9620P, HD)
Bernie Pechlaner, 2017-07-18 (Update: 2017-07-18)