Notebookcheck

Recensione del Laptop Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55 MK1

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 09/26/2019

Un osso duro. L'ultimo Toughbook da 14 pollici affronta molte delle carenze del modello dell'anno scorso, pur mantenendo la compatibilità con tutti gli accessori di ultima generazione.

Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
Processore
Intel Core i5-8365U
Scheda grafica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Core: 300 MHz, Memoria: 1200 MHz, DDR4, 25.20.100.6793
Memoria
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 10-10-10-28, Single-Channel
Schermo
14 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, capacitive 10 punti, InfoVision M140NWF5 R3, IPS, IVO057D, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Harddisk
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, 256 GB 
Scheda audio
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Porte di connessione
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 Porta Docking, Connessioni Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Lettore schede: Lettore MicroSD, Sensore luminosità
Rete
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 33 x 346 x 272
Batteria
71 Wh ioni di litio, removibile
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, 36 Mesi Garanzia, gommato, waterproof
Peso
2.23 kg, Alimentazione: 504 gr
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

352.5 mm 255 mm 59.3 mm 3.5 kg350 mm 293 mm 34.9 mm 2.2 kg347 mm 244.5 mm 32.9 mm 2.8 kg346 mm 272 mm 33 mm 2.2 kg345.5 mm 271.8 mm 30.5 mm 1.9 kg323.5 mm 217.1 mm 14.9 mm 1.1 kg
Lato frontale: Maniglia per il trasporto
Lato frontale: Maniglia per il trasporto
A destra: Stylus, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 3.1 Gen. 1 Type-A, USB 3.1 Type-C, Gigabit RJ-45, alimentazione
A destra: Stylus, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 3.1 Gen. 1 Type-A, USB 3.1 Type-C, Gigabit RJ-45, alimentazione
Lato posteriore: USB 3.1 Gen. 1 Type-A, HDMI, Nano-SIM
Lato posteriore: USB 3.1 Gen. 1 Type-A, HDMI, Nano-SIM
A sinistra: alloggiamento SATA
A sinistra: alloggiamento SATA
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182.86 MB/s ∼100% +148%
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
171.81 MB/s ∼94% +133%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
149.7 MB/s ∼82% +103%
Getac S410
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.1 MB/s ∼44% +10%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
73.8 MB/s ∼40%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
228.78 MB/s ∼100% +169%
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
228.26 MB/s ∼100% +168%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
179.6 MB/s ∼79% +111%
Getac S410
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.5 MB/s ∼37% 0%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
85.15 MB/s ∼37%
1090.9
cd/m²
1091.4
cd/m²
1157.9
cd/m²
986.5
cd/m²
1037
cd/m²
1012.6
cd/m²
875.5
cd/m²
938.4
cd/m²
945
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
InfoVision M140NWF5 R3
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 1157.9 cd/m² Media: 1015 cd/m² Minimum: 0.72 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 76 %
Al centro con la batteria: 1037 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1728:1 (Nero: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.71 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 4.52
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
57% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 36.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
InfoVision M140NWF5 R3, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
B140XTN, AUO2E3C, TN LED, 14, 1366x768
Getac S410
CMN N140BGE-E33, TN PED, 14, 1366x768
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
AU Optronics AUO523D, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
AU Optronics AUO523D, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE
LP140QH2-SPD1, IPS, 14, 2560x1440
Response Times
20%
27%
-23%
-25%
20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (20.8, 21.2)
43.2 (16.8, 26.4)
-3%
41.2 (21.6, 19.6)
2%
68 (34, 34)
-62%
62.8 (35.6, 27.2)
-50%
33.6 (16.4, 17.2)
20%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (13.2, 16.4)
17.2 (11.2, 6)
42%
14 (9.6, 4.4)
53%
33.6 (18.8, 14.8)
-14%
40 (24.4, 15.6)
-35%
24 (12.4, 11.6)
19%
PWM Frequency
694.4 (99)
877.2 (99)
26%
735.3 (100)
6%
763
10%
Screen
-49%
-45%
20%
20%
15%
Brightness middle
1037
174.5
-83%
265.1
-74%
1111.7
7%
844
-19%
338
-67%
Brightness
1015
164
-84%
246
-76%
1026
1%
793
-22%
315
-69%
Brightness Distribution
76
71
-7%
81
7%
80
5%
88
16%
88
16%
Black Level *
0.6
0.6
-0%
0.58
3%
0.81
-35%
0.54
10%
0.43
28%
Contrast
1728
291
-83%
457
-74%
1372
-21%
1563
-10%
786
-55%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.71
12.05
-111%
14.24
-149%
3.83
33%
4.8
16%
4
30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
26.27
27.5
-5%
26.66
-1%
7.85
70%
11.88
55%
7.9
70%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.52
4.34
4%
3.94
13%
2.98
34%
1.15
75%
1.7
62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.5
14.8
-169%
14.2
-158%
5.6
-2%
7.6
-38%
6.2
-13%
Gamma
2.04 108%
1.4 157%
2.03 108%
2.306 95%
2.334 94%
2.13 103%
CCT
5783 112%
14529 45%
17152 38%
7676 85%
6546 99%
6787 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.4
35.7
-2%
38.7
6%
59
62%
62
70%
68.1
87%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57
56.2
-1%
61
7%
93
63%
97
70%
97.8
72%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-15% / -39%
-9% / -30%
-2% / 11%
-3% / 11%
18% / 15%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
29.6 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 13.2 ms Incremento
↘ 16.4 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 71 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (24.9 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
42 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 20.8 ms Incremento
↘ 21.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 55 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (39.7 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 694.4 Hz ≤ 99 % settaggio luminosita'

Il display sfarfalla a 694.4 Hz (Probabilmente a causa dell'uso di PWM) Flickering rilevato ad una luminosita' di 99 % o inferiore. Non dovrebbe verificarsi flickering o PWM sopra questo valore di luminosita'.

La frequenza di 694.4 Hz è abbastanza alta, quindi la maggioranza degli utenti sensibili al PWM non dovrebbero notare alcun flickering.

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9361 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55 UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø572 (568.13-611.85)
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø538 (531.69-621.96)
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, 8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø627 (623.29-676.66)
Dell Latitude 14 5495 Vega 10, 2700U, Intel SSDSCKKF256G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø620 (605-670)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5500
Intel Core i7-8665U
199 Points ∼91% +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00
Intel Core i7-8565U
175 Points ∼80% +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
Intel Core i7-8550U
172 Points ∼79% +2%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼78% +2%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
Intel Core i5-8365U
168 Points ∼77%
Media Intel Core i5-8365U
  (163 - 171, n=4)
167 Points ∼77% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad L490 20Q6S08600
Intel Core i5-8265U
164 Points ∼75% -2%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
148 Points ∼68% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points ∼67% -13%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼66% -15%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
135 Points ∼62% -20%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel Core i5-7300U
125 Points ∼57% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
850 Points ∼19% +47%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
Intel Core i7-8550U
729 Points ∼17% +26%
Dell Latitude 5500
Intel Core i7-8665U
688 (min: 599.53, max: 729.94) Points ∼16% +19%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
670 Points ∼15% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00
Intel Core i7-8565U
618 (min: 525.84, max: 708.92) Points ∼14% +7%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
612 Points ∼14% +6%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
Intel Core i5-8365U
578 Points ∼13%
Media Intel Core i5-8365U
  (515 - 580, n=4)
558 Points ∼13% -3%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel Core i5-8250U
554 Points ∼13% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad L490 20Q6S08600
Intel Core i5-8265U
519 Points ∼12% -10%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel Core i5-7300U
344 Points ∼8% -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points ∼8% -42%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Media Intel Core i5-8365U
 
1.91 Points ∼78%
Lenovo ThinkPad L490 20Q6S08600
Intel Core i5-8265U
1.75 Points ∼72%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.63 Points ∼67%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Media Intel Core i5-8365U
 
5.74 Points ∼13%
Lenovo ThinkPad L490 20Q6S08600
Intel Core i5-8265U
5.73 Points ∼13%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel Core i5-8250U
5.56 Points ∼13%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Media Intel Core i5-8365U
 
6557 Points ∼61%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
6421 Points ∼59%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
4403 Points ∼41%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
25656 Points ∼39%
Media Intel Core i5-8365U
 
16518 Points ∼25%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
16060 Points ∼25%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel Core i7-7500U
490.184 s * ∼6%
Media Intel Core i5-8365U
 
297 s * ∼4%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Media Intel Core i5-8365U
  (9.15 - 6330, n=4)
1726 Seconds * ∼8%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel Core i7-7500U
615.331 Seconds * ∼3%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
168 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
578 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
44.81 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Aiuto
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
3843 Points ∼32% +13%
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3821 Points ∼32% +12%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3403 Points ∼28%
Media Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2859 - 3403, n=4)
3117 Points ∼26% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
3111 Points ∼26% -9%
Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
2924 Points ∼24% -14%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
2414 Points ∼20% -29%
Productivity
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
7531 Points ∼78% +25%
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
7328 Points ∼76% +22%
Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
6958 Points ∼72% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
6870 Points ∼71% +14%
Media Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6002 - 6623, n=4)
6358 Points ∼66% +6%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
6002 Points ∼62%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
5177 Points ∼53% -14%
Essentials
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
8580 Points ∼78% +9%
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
8503 Points ∼77% +8%
Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
8274 Points ∼75% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
8199 Points ∼75% +5%
Media Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7842 - 8863, n=4)
8186 Points ∼74% +4%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
7842 Points ∼71%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
5706 Points ∼52% -27%
Score
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4497 Points ∼58% +20%
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
4451 Points ∼57% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4005 Points ∼52% +7%
Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
3958 Points ∼51% +6%
Media Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3751 - 4086, n=4)
3871 Points ∼50% +3%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3751 Points ∼48%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
2972 Points ∼38% -21%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
5231 Points ∼80% +19%
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
5170 Points ∼79% +18%
Media Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4381 - 4911, n=3)
4717 Points ∼72% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4696 Points ∼72% +7%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
4381 Points ∼67%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
4197 Points ∼69% +33%
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4052 Points ∼67% +29%
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
4038 Points ∼66% +28%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
3906 Points ∼64% +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
3823 Points ∼63% +22%
Media Intel Core i5-8365U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3146 - 3546, n=4)
3392 Points ∼56% +8%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3146 Points ∼52%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3146 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4381 punti
Aiuto
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
Getac S410
CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
AS SSD
52%
122%
107%
268%
Copy Game MB/s
385.86
1045.14
171%
792.9
105%
Copy Program MB/s
204.71
422.77
107%
378.14
85%
Copy ISO MB/s
553.43
2150.99
289%
1622.33
193%
Score Total
1083
1154
7%
2475
129%
2099
94%
3874
258%
Score Write
413
443
7%
1143
177%
804
95%
1553
276%
Score Read
440
466
6%
921
109%
886
101%
1554
253%
Access Time Write *
0.058
0.045
22%
0.051
12%
0.051
12%
0.023
60%
Access Time Read *
0.089
0.058
35%
0.044
51%
0.044
51%
4K-64 Write
313.71
329.01
5%
981.79
213%
604.26
93%
1148.49
266%
4K-64 Read
369.84
382.32
3%
676.65
83%
636.48
72%
1209.22
227%
4K Write
60.32
74.1
23%
96.39
60%
97.93
62%
175.63
191%
4K Read
26.18
34.9
33%
39.34
50%
39.91
52%
47.39
81%
Seq Write
387.3
396.13
2%
652.54
68%
1015.89
162%
2287
490%
Seq Read
437.71
484.2
11%
2053.85
369%
2096.13
379%
2978
580%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 547.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 527.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 181.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 234.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 481.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 460.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 31.11 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 55.44 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
4394 Points ∼19% +222%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
2742 Points ∼12% +101%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8559U
2583 Points ∼11% +90%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2012 Points ∼9% +48%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8565U
1644 Points ∼7% +21%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (959 - 2084, n=169)
1536 Points ∼7% +13%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1485 Points ∼7% +9%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8365U
1363 Points ∼6%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1193 Points ∼5% -12%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950
754 Points ∼3% -45%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
7794 Points ∼15% +352%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
4905 Points ∼10% +185%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
3164 Points ∼6% +84%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8559U
3081 Points ∼6% +79%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8565U
1785 Points ∼4% +4%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8365U
1724 Points ∼3%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 2006, n=169)
1714 Points ∼3% -1%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1597 Points ∼3% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1489 Points ∼3% -14%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950
765 Points ∼2% -56%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
5062 Points ∼12% +384%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
3726 Points ∼9% +256%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8559U
2260 Points ∼6% +116%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
1940 Points ∼5% +85%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8565U
1169 Points ∼3% +12%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1401, n=136)
1125 Points ∼3% +8%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1111 Points ∼3% +6%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8365U
1046 Points ∼3%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
842 Points ∼2% -20%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
31294 Points ∼17% +271%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
21755 Points ∼12% +158%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8559U
16698 Points ∼9% +98%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
13634 Points ∼7% +62%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8565U
9500 Points ∼5% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8565U
9500 Points ∼5% +13%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=154)
9137 Points ∼5% +8%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
8947 Points ∼5% +6%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8365U
8439 Points ∼5%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
7285 Points ∼4% -14%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950
3997 Points ∼2% -53%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
71660 Points ∼10% +91%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
59083 Points ∼8% +57%
Dell Latitude 3390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
51835 Points ∼7% +38%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (29002 - 59483, n=38)
43784 Points ∼6% +17%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8365U
37582 Points ∼5%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
36295 Points ∼5% -3%
Chuwi LapBook Plus
Intel HD Graphics 505, x7-E3950
17895 Points ∼2% -52%
3DMark 11 Performance
1875 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
57207 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7800 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
967 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score
407 punti
Aiuto
The Witcher 3
1366x768 The Witcher 3 medium
Media della classe Office
  (5.8 - 50.3, n=57)
18.2 fps ∼100%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (8 - 10.9, n=16)
9.71 fps ∼53%
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 high
Media della classe Office
  (3.1 - 31.7, n=48)
11 fps ∼100%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4.2 - 8.8, n=12)
5.74 fps ∼52%
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra
Media della classe Office
  (1.9 - 16.4, n=28)
7.28 fps ∼100%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2.97 - 5.2, n=5)
3.45 fps ∼47%
3840x2160 The Witcher 3 4K
1024x768 The Witcher 3 low
Media della classe Office
  (8.3 - 81.7, n=89)
24 fps ∼100%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (9.59 - 17.8, n=37)
15.2 fps ∼63%
3840x2160 The Witcher 3 4K ultra
1280x800 Lightsmark - 1280x800
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (122 - 122, n=184)
122 ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (122 - 122, n=1029)
122 ∼100%
1280x800 Lightsmark - 1280x800
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (123 - 123, n=184)
123 ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (123 - 123, n=1029)
123 ∼100%
1280x720 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (148 - 148, n=184)
148 ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (148 - 148, n=1029)
148 ∼100%
1280x768 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (149 - 149, n=184)
149 ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (149 - 149, n=1029)
149 ∼100%
1366x768 3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (229 - 229, n=184)
229 ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (229 - 229, n=1029)
229 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis CPU - 1600x900 High
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (230 - 230, n=184)
230 ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (230 - 230, n=1029)
230 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis CPU - 1600x900 Med
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (231 - 231, n=184)
231 ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (231 - 231, n=1029)
231 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis CPU - 1600x900 Low
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (232 - 232, n=184)
232 ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (232 - 232, n=1029)
232 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis GPU - 1600x900 High
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (233 - 233, n=184)
233 ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (233 - 233, n=1029)
233 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis GPU - 1600x900 Med
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (234 - 234, n=184)
234 ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (234 - 234, n=1029)
234 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis GPU - 1600x900 Low
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (235 - 235, n=184)
235 ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (235 - 235, n=1029)
235 ∼100%
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
UHD Graphics 620, 8365U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
Radeon RX 540, 8650U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Noise
1%
5%
3%
0%
4%
off /ambiente *
29
28.3
2%
28.4
2%
28.3
2%
28.6
1%
28.4
2%
Idle Minimum *
29
28.8
1%
28.4
2%
28.3
2%
28.6
1%
28.4
2%
Idle Average *
29.6
28.8
3%
28.4
4%
28.3
4%
28.6
3%
28.4
4%
Idle Maximum *
30.5
29.1
5%
28.4
7%
28.3
7%
28.6
6%
28.6
6%
Load Average *
30.3
31.3
-3%
30.3
-0%
29.9
1%
32.9
-9%
31.5
-4%
Load Maximum *
39
40
-3%
33.3
15%
38
3%
39
-0%
33.1
15%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Rumorosità

Idle
29 / 29.6 / 30.5 dB(A)
Sotto carico
30.3 / 39 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 29 dB(A)
Carico massimo
 25.8 °C33 °C36 °C 
 26 °C29.2 °C31.4 °C 
 26 °C27.2 °C28.6 °C 
Massima: 36 °C
Media: 29.2 °C
37.8 °C31.6 °C27.4 °C
34.6 °C30 °C26.6 °C
28.6 °C27.6 °C26.2 °C
Massima: 37.8 °C
Media: 30 °C
Alimentazione (max)  34 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 29.2 °C / 85 F, rispetto alla media di 29.4 °C / 85 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Office.
(+) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 36 °C / 97 F, rispetto alla media di 33.9 °C / 93 F, che varia da 21.2 a 62.5 °C per questa classe Office.
(+) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 37.8 °C / 100 F, rispetto alla media di 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 22.7 °C / 73 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204447.32540.840.63141.341.44038.740.75038.139.26337.540.78038.23910036.138.912536.137.31603435.420033.437.225033.739.431532.846.640031.552.150031.260.363030.468.480029.972.9100029.375.9125028.975.7160028.875.9200028.474.1250028.469.8315028.170.940002869.550002870.3630027.869.2800027.769.81000027.6711250027.765.71600027.559.5SPL41.184.3N4.257.3median 28.9median 69.2Delta21035.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoisePanasonic Toughbook FZ-55Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55 analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.27 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.068 / 0.64 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.7 / 9.6 / 10.4 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 40 / 71.9 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
8365U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048, TN LED, 1366x768, 14
Getac S410
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A, TN PED, 1366x768, 14
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
8650U, Radeon RX 540, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
8650U, Radeon RX 540, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE
8665U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 2560x1440, 14
Power Consumption
22%
11%
-41%
-59%
14%
Idle Minimum *
3.7
4.4
-19%
5.6
-51%
4.8
-30%
6.5
-76%
3
19%
Idle Average *
9.6
6.3
34%
7.9
18%
13.6
-42%
15.1
-57%
6.3
34%
Idle Maximum *
10.4
6.5
37%
8.4
19%
13.8
-33%
16.1
-55%
8.9
14%
Load Average *
40
36.3
9%
32.8
18%
67.8
-70%
70.5
-76%
40.8
-2%
Load Maximum *
71.9
38.3
47%
34.3
52%
93.5
-30%
95.2
-32%
67.5
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
69.1
68.1

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18ore 24minuti
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55
8365U, UHD Graphics 620, 71 Wh
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 33 Wh
Getac S410
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 46.6 Wh
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
8650U, Radeon RX 540, 102 Wh
Dell Latitude 7424 Rugged Extreme
8650U, Radeon RX 540, 102 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE
8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
-68%
-72%
-12%
-36%
-55%
Reader / Idle
1882
WiFi v1.3
1104
352
-68%
312
-72%
972
-12%
703
-36%
493
-55%
Load
190
160
83

Pro

+ batteria secondaria sostituibile e unità SATA
+ touchpad più grande rispetto all'ultima generazione
+ tastiera estraibile e sostituibile
+ telaio rigido certificato IP53
+ vasta gamma di accessori
+ incavo per la stilo integrata
+ altoparlanti interni potenti
+ durata della batteria molto lunga
+ display molto luminoso
+ 4G LTE opzionale
+ cover robusta

Contro

- PWM presente su quasi tutti i livelli di luminosità
- effetto bleeding della retroilluminazione moderato-pesante e irregolare
- la tastiera deve essere sostituita se rimossa
- lo slot MicroSD downgraded è più lento
- non può essere ricaricata tramite USB Type-C
- scarsa riproduzione dei bassi
- spazio di colore limitato
- il display è granuloso
- no eSIM o NFC
Recensione del Panasonic Toughbook 55 MK1. Modello di test fornito da Panasonic
Recensione del Panasonic Toughbook 55 MK1. Modello di test fornito da Panasonic

Il Toughbook 55 offre prestazioni della CPU più veloci del 70% rispetto al Toughbook 54, pur essendo compatibile con tutti i suoi accessori. La durata della batteria è inoltre straordinariamente lunga a 18 ore di uso costante WLAN e le batterie, le unità M.2, WAN e l'espansione SATA lo rendono una macchina versatile.

Ci sono aspetti che pensiamo potrebbero essere migliori. Il lettore MicroSD più lento è un downgrade rispetto al modello di ultima generazione e i piccoli tasti freccia sono troppo stretti. Alcune caratteristiche che sono di serie sulla maggior parte degli Ultrabooks sono opzionali sul Toughbook, tra cui USB Type-C PD e un lettore di impronte digitali. Altre caratteristiche sono completamente mancanti come Thunderbolt 3, 4K UHD e NFC. Inoltre, il display luminoso potrebbe essere meno sgranato con colori più profondi, senza PWM, e leggero effetto bleeding irregolare della retroilluminazione per una migliore esperienza visiva.

    Il Toughbook 55 è ideale per la sua autonomia, il display luminoso, la vasta gamma di accessori e la facilità di manutenzione. Basta non aspettarsi i migliori colori o prestazioni elevate, poiché le opzioni del processore sono limitate alla famiglia di processori Intel di classe U con una GPU Radeon opzionale di tre anni fa.

Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55 - 09/26/2019 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis
85 / 98 → 87%
Tastiera
73%
Dispositivo di puntamento
69%
Connettività
49 / 80 → 61%
Peso
62 / 20-75 → 75%
Batteria
Display
84%
Prestazioni di gioco
50 / 78 → 64%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
80 / 95 → 84%
Temperatura
95%
Rumorosità
95%
Audio
74%
Fotocamera
38 / 85 → 44%
Media
71%
80%
Office - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione del Laptop Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55 MK1
Allen Ngo, 2019-09-26 (Update: 2019-09-26)