Notebookcheck

Recensione dello ZTE Axon 20 - Come funziona la fotocamera principale sotto il display di uno smartphone?

SoC esotico. Uno dei telefoni più innovativi dell'anno proviene da ZTE. L'Axon 20 è il primo smartphone con una fotocamera sotto il display che fa a meno di una tacca o di un meccanismo pop-up. Se il modulo della fotocamera sotto il pannello OLED dell'Axon 20 è convincente, lo si può scoprire nella nostra recensione dello smartphone ZTE.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
ZTE Axon 20 (Axon Serie)
Processore
UNISOC Tiger T618 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Memoria
6144 MB 
Schermo
6.92 pollici 20.5:9, 2460 x 1080 pixel 388 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, lucido: si, 60 Hz
Harddisk
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Connessioni Audio: Type-C-Port, Lettore schede: microSD fino a 2 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: accelerometro, giroscopio, sensore di prossimità, bussola, OTG, Miracast
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.98 x 172.1 x 77.9
Batteria
4220 mAh ioni di litio
Ricarica
ricarica rapida
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 64 MPix (f/1,8, confronto di fase-AF, Video @1080p/60fps, Camera 1); 8,0MP (f/2,2, obiettivo grandangolare, Camera 2); 2,0MP (f/2,4, obiettivo macro, Camera 3); 2,0MP (f/2,4, profondità di campo, Camera 4), camera2-API: Limitata
Fotocamera Secondaria: 32 MPix (AI-fotocamera sotto il display)
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Mono, caricabatterie, cavo USB, MiFavor UI, 24 Mesi Garanzia, Widevine L3, valore SAR: 1,041W/kg Testina, banda singola: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, senza ventola
Peso
198 gr, Alimentazione: 51 gr
Prezzo
399 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

, , , , , ,
relazione di ricerca.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Confronto con i possibili concorrenti

Punteggio
Data
Modello
Peso
Drive
Dimensione
Risoluzione
Miglior Prezzo
77 %
01/2021
ZTE Axon 20
Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2
198 gr128 GB eMMC Flash6.92"2460x1080
81 %
12/2020
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L
190 gr128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.49"2400x1080
82 %
12/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
215 gr128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %
10/2020
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
SD 730G, Adreno 618
223 gr128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.81"2400x1080
81 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy M51
SD 730, Adreno 618
213 gr128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.70"2400x1080
86 %
07/2020
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
219 gr128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
Test ZTE Axon 20
Test ZTE Axon 20
Test ZTE Axon 20

Confronto dimensioni

172.1 mm 77.9 mm 7.98 mm 198 g170 mm 78.1 mm 9.7 mm 223 g165.38 mm 76.8 mm 9 mm 215 g163.9 mm 76.3 mm 9.5 mm 213 g163.3 mm 75.4 mm 8.9 mm 219 g163 mm 74.7 mm 8.95 mm 190 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
859 (755min - 907max) MBit/s ∼100% +183%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 (604min - 684max) MBit/s ∼77% +119%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼64% +81%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=305, last 2 years)
415 MBit/s ∼48% +37%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
326 (309min - 343max) MBit/s ∼38% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 (318min - 330max) MBit/s ∼38% +7%
ZTE Axon 20
Mali-G52 MP2, Tiger T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
304 (186min - 418max) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
770 (741min - 794max) MBit/s ∼100% +142%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
667 (339min - 692max) MBit/s ∼87% +110%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (596min - 664max) MBit/s ∼84% +103%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=305, last 2 years)
419 MBit/s ∼54% +32%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
337 (270min - 351max) MBit/s ∼44% +6%
ZTE Axon 20
Mali-G52 MP2, Tiger T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
318 (289min - 326max) MBit/s ∼41%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
309 (140min - 360max) MBit/s ∼40% -3%
, , , , , ,
relazione di ricerca.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400320308289322300321310322321321326319322320320318321324325319322319322316320319321324309322320308289322300321310322321321326319322320320318321324325319322319322316320319321324309322319312328301327309316316286310285313294299301288319186418305301306282300302298294315291303Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø318 (289-326)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø304 (186-418)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS ZTE Axon 20
GPS ZTE Axon 20
GPS ZTE Axon 20
GPS ZTE Axon 20
GPS ZTE Axon 20
GPS ZTE Axon 20
Ultra grandangolare
Ultra grandangolare
Grandangolo
Grandangolo
Zoom 4x (max)
Zoom 4x (max)

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Wide-angleWide-angleLow LightZoomUltra-wide-angle
click per caricare le immagini
ColorChecker
6.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
ColorChecker ZTE Axon 20: 6.42 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 10.88 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.4 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
66.6 ∆E
65.2 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
77.9 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
94.9 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
53 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker ZTE Axon 20: 47.76 ∆E min: 13.95 - max: 94.85 ∆E
398
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 413 cd/m² Media: 405 cd/m² Minimum: 0.36 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 96 %
Al centro con la batteria: 402 cd/m²
Contrasto: ∞:1 (Nero: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
ZTE Axon 20
OLED, 2460x1080, 6.92
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.49
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.81
Samsung Galaxy M51
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
18%
27%
6%
25%
61%
Brightness middle
402
450
12%
606
51%
390
-3%
626
56%
799
99%
Brightness
405
422
4%
574
42%
377
-7%
632
56%
801
98%
Brightness Distribution
96
89
-7%
89
-7%
93
-3%
94
-2%
97
1%
Black Level *
0.57
0.44
0.66
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.5
2.67
24%
2.4
31%
3.39
3%
2.88
18%
1.46
58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.7
6.76
12%
5.3
31%
5.22
32%
4.97
35%
2.92
62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.1
2
61%
4.5
12%
4.3
16%
5.9
-16%
2.7
47%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.274 97%
2.21 100%
2.506 88%
3.441 64%
2.237 98%
CCT
7480 87%
6859 95%
6224 104%
6033 108%
6415 101%
6003 108%
Contrast
789
1377
591

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 367.6 Hz ≤ 99 % settaggio luminosita'

Il display sfarfalla a 367.6 Hz (Probabilmente a causa dell'uso di PWM) Flickering rilevato ad una luminosita' di 99 % o inferiore. Non dovrebbe verificarsi flickering o PWM sopra questo valore di luminosita'.

La frequenza di 367.6 Hz è relativamente elevata, quindi la maggioranza degli utenti sensibili al PWM non dovrebbe notare alcun flickering. Tuttavia, è stato segnalato che alcuni utenti sono sensibili al PWM a 500 Hz ed oltre, quindi prestate attenzione.

In confronto: 52 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 14793 (minimo: 5 - massimo: 2500000) Hz è stata rilevata.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
3.2 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 1.6 ms Incremento
↘ 1.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 3 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono migliori rispettto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (24 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
3.2 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 1.6 ms Incremento
↘ 1.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 1 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono migliori rispettto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (38.1 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
393 Points ∼43%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
610 Points ∼66% +55%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
658 Points ∼71% +67%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
551 Points ∼60% +40%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
548 Points ∼59% +39%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
923 Points ∼100% +135%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
299 Points ∼32% -24%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
393 Points ∼43% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=237, last 2 years)
570 Points ∼62% +45%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1342 Points ∼39%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1873 Points ∼55% +40%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2009 Points ∼59% +50%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1786 Points ∼53% +33%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1780 Points ∼52% +33%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3399 Points ∼100% +153%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1332 Points ∼39% -1%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1342 Points ∼39% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=237, last 2 years)
1953 Points ∼57% +46%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1022 Points ∼33%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
905 Points ∼30% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1081 Points ∼35% +6%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
987 Points ∼32% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1007 Points ∼33% -1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3059 Points ∼100% +199%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1017 Points ∼33% 0%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1022 Points ∼33% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=127, last 2 years)
2092 Points ∼68% +105%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
12638 Points ∼100%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
10321 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8853 Points ∼70% -30%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
9956 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9075 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
12129 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8211 Points ∼65% -35%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
12638 Points ∼100% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=223, last 2 years)
9982 Points ∼79% -21%
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
82 Points ∼1%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8021 Points ∼78% +9682%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7547 Points ∼73% +9104%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
7737 Points ∼75% +9335%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7913 Points ∼76% +9550%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
10347 Points ∼100% +12518%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7789 Points ∼75% +9399%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
82 Points ∼1% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=268, last 2 years)
7899 Points ∼76% +9533%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
25992 Points ∼34%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
35182 Points ∼46% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40032 Points ∼53% +54%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
39572 Points ∼52% +52%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
39944 Points ∼52% +54%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
76099 Points ∼100% +193%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19601 Points ∼26% -25%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
25992 Points ∼34% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=207, last 2 years)
40247 Points ∼53% +55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
27034 Points ∼18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
44899 Points ∼31% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
55911 Points ∼38% +107%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
53182 Points ∼36% +97%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
52736 Points ∼36% +95%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
146854 Points ∼100% +443%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
23224 Points ∼16% -14%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
27034 Points ∼18% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=207, last 2 years)
58049 Points ∼40% +115%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
22763 Points ∼79%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
19976 Points ∼69% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20076 Points ∼69% -12%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
20382 Points ∼70% -10%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
21603 Points ∼75% -5%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
28985 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12601 Points ∼43% -45%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
22763 Points ∼79% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=207, last 2 years)
23323 Points ∼80% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2182 Points ∼27%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3208 Points ∼39% +47%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2825 Points ∼34% +29%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3556 Points ∼43% +63%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3547 Points ∼43% +63%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8215 Points ∼100% +276%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1525 Points ∼19% -30%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2182 Points ∼27% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=261, last 2 years)
3370 Points ∼41% +54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2033 Points ∼18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3197 Points ∼28% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4072 Points ∼35% +100%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3678 Points ∼32% +81%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3604 Points ∼31% +77%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11569 Points ∼100% +469%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1493 Points ∼13% -27%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2033 Points ∼18% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=261, last 2 years)
3942 Points ∼34% +94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2601 Points ∼66%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3257 Points ∼82% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3523 Points ∼89% +35%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3349 Points ∼84% +29%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3362 Points ∼85% +29%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3965 Points ∼100% +52%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2332 Points ∼59% -10%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2601 Points ∼66% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=261, last 2 years)
2757 Points ∼70% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2122 Points ∼25%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3327 Points ∼38% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4110 Points ∼48% +94%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3704 Points ∼43% +75%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3644 Points ∼42% +72%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8652 Points ∼100% +308%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1573 Points ∼18% -26%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2122 Points ∼25% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=278, last 2 years)
3964 Points ∼46% +87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2032 Points ∼16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3307 Points ∼26% +63%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4263 Points ∼34% +110%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3773 Points ∼30% +86%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3741 Points ∼30% +84%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
12547 Points ∼100% +517%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1452 Points ∼12% -29%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2032 Points ∼16% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=278, last 2 years)
5019 Points ∼40% +147%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2611 Points ∼66%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3984 Points ∼100% +53%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3651 Points ∼92% +40%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3352 Points ∼84% +28%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3339 Points ∼84% +28%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3956 Points ∼99% +52%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2511 Points ∼63% -4%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2611 Points ∼66% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=276, last 2 years)
2911 Points ∼73% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1442 Points ∼20%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2198 Points ∼30% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2778 Points ∼38% +93%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2489 Points ∼34% +73%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2469 Points ∼34% +71%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7265 Points ∼100% +404%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1099 Points ∼15% -24%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1442 Points ∼20% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=259, last 2 years)
2628 Points ∼36% +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1283 Points ∼15%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1982 Points ∼24% +54%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2617 Points ∼31% +104%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2293 Points ∼27% +79%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2299 Points ∼27% +79%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8365 Points ∼100% +552%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
951 Points ∼11% -26%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1283 Points ∼15% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=259, last 2 years)
2784 Points ∼33% +117%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2643 Points ∼53%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3265 Points ∼66% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3542 Points ∼71% +34%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3328 Points ∼67% +26%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3331 Points ∼67% +26%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
4958 Points ∼100% +88%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2338 Points ∼47% -12%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2643 Points ∼53% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=259, last 2 years)
2803 Points ∼57% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1504 Points ∼18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2348 Points ∼29% +56%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2973 Points ∼37% +98%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2701 Points ∼33% +80%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2619 Points ∼32% +74%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8145 Points ∼100% +442%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1123 Points ∼14% -25%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1504 Points ∼18% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=277, last 2 years)
3226 Points ∼40% +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1352 Points ∼14%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2187 Points ∼23% +62%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points ∼30% +109%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2471 Points ∼26% +83%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2465 Points ∼26% +82%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
9466 Points ∼100% +600%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
988 Points ∼10% -27%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1352 Points ∼14% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=277, last 2 years)
3622 Points ∼38% +168%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2526 Points ∼46%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3374 Points ∼62% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3649 Points ∼67% +44%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3391 Points ∼62% +34%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3349 Points ∼61% +33%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5466 Points ∼100% +116%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2501 Points ∼46% -1%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2526 Points ∼46% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=277, last 2 years)
2967 Points ∼54% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1463 Points ∼24%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2081 Points ∼34% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2581 Points ∼42% +76%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2310 Points ∼38% +58%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2302 Points ∼38% +57%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6106 Points ∼100% +317%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1066 Points ∼17% -27%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1463 Points ∼24% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=216, last 2 years)
2634 Points ∼43% +80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1324 Points ∼16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1932 Points ∼23% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2510 Points ∼30% +90%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2199 Points ∼27% +66%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2180 Points ∼26% +65%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8265 Points ∼100% +524%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
911 Points ∼11% -31%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1324 Points ∼16% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=216, last 2 years)
2956 Points ∼36% +123%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2193 Points ∼69%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2769 Points ∼87% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2864 Points ∼90% +31%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2775 Points ∼87% +27%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2862 Points ∼90% +31%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3193 Points ∼100% +46%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2298 Points ∼72% +5%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2193 Points ∼69% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=216, last 2 years)
2651 Points ∼83% +21%
Wild Life Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
693 Points ∼25%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
821 Points ∼29% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points ∼39% +58%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
564 Points ∼20% -19%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
693 Points ∼25% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=93, last 2 years)
2799 Points ∼100% +304%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
694 Points ∼23%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
809 Points ∼27% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1094 Points ∼36% +58%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
552 Points ∼18% -20%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
694 Points ∼23% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=90, last 2 years)
3003 Points ∼100% +333%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
37 fps ∼62%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
58 fps ∼97% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
50 fps ∼83% +35%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +54%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
55 fps ∼92% +49%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +62%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼60% -3%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
37 fps ∼62% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=218, last 2 years)
57.5 fps ∼96% +55%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
43 fps ∼21%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
73 fps ∼36% +70%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
90 fps ∼44% +109%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
86 fps ∼42% +100%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
67 fps ∼33% +56%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
205 fps ∼100% +377%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
40 fps ∼20% -7%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
43 fps ∼21% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=218, last 2 years)
107 fps ∼52% +149%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
22 fps ∼37%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
33 fps ∼55% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40 fps ∼67% +82%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
38 fps ∼63% +73%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps ∼52% +41%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +173%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
15 fps ∼25% -32%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
22 fps ∼37% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=216, last 2 years)
45.5 fps ∼76% +107%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
26 fps ∼21%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
37 fps ∼30% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
45 fps ∼36% +73%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
42 fps ∼34% +62%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼27% +31%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
125 fps ∼100% +381%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼15% -27%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
26 fps ∼21% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=217, last 2 years)
62.7 fps ∼50% +141%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
13 fps ∼22%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
23 fps ∼39% +77%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
29 fps ∼49% +123%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
27 fps ∼46% +108%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
22 fps ∼37% +69%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +354%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.9 fps ∼13% -39%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
13 fps ∼22% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)
35.9 fps ∼61% +176%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
15 fps ∼17%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
26 fps ∼30% +73%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼38% +120%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
30 fps ∼34% +100%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼27% +60%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
88 fps ∼100% +487%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼15% -13%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
15 fps ∼17% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=215, last 2 years)
43 fps ∼49% +187%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.5 fps ∼19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
13 fps ∼30% +53%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼36% +88%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼36% +88%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
12 fps ∼27% +41%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps ∼100% +418%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.1 fps ∼16% -16%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
8.5 fps ∼19% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=214, last 2 years)
22.4 fps ∼51% +164%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
13 fps ∼25%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps ∼27% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps ∼37% +46%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
17 fps ∼33% +31%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
14 fps ∼27% +8%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
51 fps ∼100% +292%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8.1 fps ∼16% -38%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
13 fps ∼25% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)
25.8 fps ∼51% +98%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
11 fps ∼24%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps ∼30% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
17 fps ∼37% +55%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼35% +45%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼28% +18%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
46 fps ∼100% +318%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.7 fps ∼15% -39%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
11 fps ∼24% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=283, last 2 years)
22.5 fps ∼49% +105%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.8 fps ∼16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
15 fps ∼28% +70%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼37% +127%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
18 fps ∼33% +105%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼28% +70%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
54 fps ∼100% +514%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.6 fps ∼14% -14%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
8.8 fps ∼16% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=282, last 2 years)
25.9 fps ∼48% +194%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5.4 fps ∼19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8.7 fps ∼30% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼38% +104%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
10 fps ∼34% +85%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
8.3 fps ∼29% +54%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +437%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.4 fps ∼15% -19%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
5.4 fps ∼19% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=283, last 2 years)
14.9 fps ∼51% +176%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.7 fps ∼19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
5.8 fps ∼29% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.4 fps ∼37% +100%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6.3 fps ∼32% +70%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
5.4 fps ∼27% +46%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
20 fps ∼100% +441%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.8 fps ∼14% -24%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
3.7 fps ∼19% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=282, last 2 years)
10.2 fps ∼51% +176%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
203961 Points ∼36%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
282385 Points ∼50% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
331554 Points ∼58% +63%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
251673 Points ∼44% +23%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
247877 Points ∼43% +22%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
569967 Points ∼100% +179%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
169704 Points ∼30% -17%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
203961 Points ∼36% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=189, last 2 years)
334991 Points ∼59% +64%
VRMark - Amber Room (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1552 Score ∼48%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1899 Score ∼58% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2568 Score ∼79% +65%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1221 Score ∼38% -21%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1552 Score ∼48% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=57, last 2 years)
3256 Score ∼100% +110%
AImark - Score v2.x (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
4726 Points ∼8%
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
0 Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
4989 Points ∼8% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4989 Points ∼8% +6%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4489 Points ∼7% -5%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
  (0 - 4726, n=2)
2363 Points ∼4% -50%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=66, last 2 years)
61201 Points ∼100% +1195%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
16.35 (8.53min - 45.12max) fps ∼20%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
22.91 (13.01min - 32.04max) fps ∼29% +40%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
27.32 fps ∼34% +67%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16.3 (7.51min - 30.54max) fps ∼20% 0%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
16.4 fps ∼21% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4.7 - 1902, n=43, last 2 years)
79.9 fps ∼100% +389%
OpenGL Medium Native (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
fps ∼0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
20.52 (11.64min - 35.95max) fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
24.34 fps ∼34%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14.32 (7.44min - 24.67max) fps ∼20%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5 - 1736, n=42, last 2 years)
71.8 fps ∼100%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
106.4 (33.66min - 598.43max) fps ∼36%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
198.56 (77.43min - 1345.87max) fps ∼67% +87%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
194.39 fps ∼66% +83%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
112.32 (41.21min - 654.22max) fps ∼38% +6%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
106 fps ∼36% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (29.8 - 2982, n=38, last 2 years)
296 fps ∼100% +178%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
16.43 (4.23min - 31.34max) fps ∼20%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
22.85 (12.92min - 52.46max) fps ∼28% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26.49 fps ∼33% +61%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16.03 (5.56min - 43.21max) fps ∼20% -2%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
16.4 fps ∼20% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (8.79 - 1962, n=42, last 2 years)
80.9 fps ∼100% +392%
Vulkan Medium Native (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
13.26 (4.93min - 27.347max) fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
23.36 fps ∼33% +76%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14.21 (4.78min - 28.84max) fps ∼20% +7%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
13.3 fps ∼19% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (10.5 - 1746, n=42, last 2 years)
70.3 fps ∼100% +430%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2033 Points ∼32%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3387 Points ∼54% +67%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3688 Points ∼59% +81%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3412 Points ∼54% +68%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3539 Points ∼56% +74%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6273 Points ∼100% +209%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2173 Points ∼35% +7%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2033 Points ∼32% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=201, last 2 years)
3654 Points ∼58% +80%
System (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
4403 Points ∼44%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
6617 Points ∼66% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7033 Points ∼70% +60%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6612 Points ∼66% +50%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6606 Points ∼66% +50%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
10075 Points ∼100% +129%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4934 Points ∼49% +12%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
4403 Points ∼44% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=201, last 2 years)
6675 Points ∼66% +52%
Memory (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1725 Points ∼19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
4297 Points ∼48% +149%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4687 Points ∼53% +172%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
4029 Points ∼45% +134%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4482 Points ∼51% +160%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8874 Points ∼100% +414%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2772 Points ∼31% +61%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1725 Points ∼19% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=201, last 2 years)
4273 Points ∼48% +148%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1834 Points ∼16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3321 Points ∼28% +81%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3947 Points ∼34% +115%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3984 Points ∼34% +117%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3875 Points ∼33% +111%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11736 Points ∼100% +540%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1572 Points ∼13% -14%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1834 Points ∼16% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=201, last 2 years)
5690 Points ∼48% +210%
Web (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1334 Points ∼92%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1354 Points ∼93% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1422 Points ∼98% +7%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1347 Points ∼93% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1366 Points ∼94% +2%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
1456 Points ∼100% +9%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1023 Points ∼70% -23%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1334 Points ∼92% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=201, last 2 years)
1276 Points ∼88% -4%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
67.698 Points ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
52.656 Points ∼78% +28%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
50.582 Points ∼75% +23%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
50.111 Points ∼74% +22%
Media della classe Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
50 Points ∼74% +21%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
41.23 Points ∼61%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
41.2 Points ∼61% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
16.421 Points ∼24% -60%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
119.9 Points ∼100% +90%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
93.023 Points ∼78% +47%
Media della classe Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=194, last 2 years)
90.3 Points ∼75% +43%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
86.541 Points ∼72% +37%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
66.339 Points ∼55% +5%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
63.23 Points ∼53%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
63.2 Points ∼53% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
23.745 Points ∼20% -62%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
74.5 runs/min ∼100% +124%
Media della classe Smartphone (9 - 196, n=166, last 2 years)
50.7 runs/min ∼68% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
46.2 runs/min ∼62% +39%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
43.3 runs/min ∼58% +30%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chome 85)
41.3 runs/min ∼55% +24%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
33.3 runs/min ∼45%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
33.3 runs/min ∼45% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
13.3 runs/min ∼18% -60%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
103 Points ∼100% +51%
Media della classe Smartphone (20 - 194, n=204, last 2 years)
78.3 Points ∼76% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
76 Points ∼74% +12%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
69 Points ∼67% +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
68 Points ∼66% 0%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
68 Points ∼66%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
68 Points ∼66% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
29 Points ∼28% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
24369 Points ∼100% +103%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
17809 Points ∼73% +48%
Media della classe Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=211, last 2 years)
17453 Points ∼72% +45%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
16729 Points ∼69% +39%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
16399 Points ∼67% +36%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
12022 Points ∼49%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
12022 Points ∼49% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
4395 Points ∼18% -63%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
12192.2 ms * ∼100% -255%
Media della classe Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=213, last 2 years)
3978 ms * ∼33% -16%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
3432.4 ms * ∼28%
Media UNISOC Tiger T618
3432 ms * ∼28% -0%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
2783.1 ms * ∼23% +19%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
2773.8 ms * ∼23% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
2622.8 ms * ∼22% +24%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
1993.1 ms * ∼16% +42%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

ZTE Axon 20OnePlus Nord N10 5GXiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GMotorola Moto G9 PlusSamsung Galaxy M51Xiaomi Poco F2 ProMedia 128 GB eMMC FlashMedia della classe Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
361%
519%
287%
305%
1191%
123%
374%
Sequential Read 256KB
106.67
865.23
711%
938.14
779%
489.37
359%
491.7
361%
1634.45
1432%
289 (107 - 501, n=37)
171%
753 (41.9 - 2037, n=288, last 2 years)
606%
Sequential Write 256KB
202.34
187.24
-7%
463.5
129%
186.23
-8%
189.8
-6%
721.95
257%
191 (90 - 314, n=37)
-6%
329 (11.9 - 1321, n=288, last 2 years)
63%
Random Read 4KB
25.35
136.98
440%
176.59
597%
134.77
432%
123.6
388%
229.74
806%
77.1 (20.7 - 247, n=37)
204%
135 (13.5 - 325, n=288, last 2 years)
433%
Random Write 4KB
9.56
106.01
1009%
162.33
1598%
98.12
926%
114.5
1098%
226.45
2269%
44.9 (8.48 - 151, n=37)
370%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=288, last 2 years)
1155%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
87.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
74.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
78 (29.2 - 154, n=33)
-3%
75.9 (13.4 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
65.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
59.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
62.5 (26.1 - 81.9, n=33)
0%
58.2 (8.4 - 83.3, n=175, last 2 years)
-7%
PUBG mobile
05101520253035404039404040403841394040394040394040404040404038414040394040404040404039404139404140394139404040404040413940404040394040403941383640393938413940404038414040404040404040393841404040404040404040404039404040403841394040394040394040404040404038414040394040404040404039404139404140394139404040404040413940404040394040403941383640393938413940404038414040404040404040393841404040404040404040404040404040403940403941394140404040393740404040394040404040404040404040394139404040403940384140404040404040404040403941404040403940404040404040403941404040404040404040403840404040394040393940404040394040404038413940403940403940404040404040384140403940404040404040394041394041403941394040404040404139404040403940404039413836403939384139404040384140404040404040403938414040404040404040404040404040404039404039413941404040403937404040403940404040404040404040403941394040404039403841404040404040404040404039414040404039404040404040404039414040404040404040404038404040403940403939404040303030303029312930303030303030293030292930303031302929303031283030303030303029302930302930302931293129303030302931303030303029303129303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030293130293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø39.8 (36-41)
; Balanced: Ø39.8 (37-41)
; HD: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Asphalt 9 Legends
051015202530