C 2018
Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone ZTE Axon 7

Manuel Masiero, Stefanie Voigt (traduzione a cura di G.DeLuca), 11/07/2016

Erede al trono? Con l'Axon 7, ZTE punta alla corona per smartphone. Oltre a top performance e dotazioni superbe, questo 5.5" high-end Android impressiona con sound system Dolby Atmos, che riesce a riempire una stanza col suo suono.

ZTE Axon 7 (Axon Serie)
Scheda grafica
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 534 PPI, AMOLED, WQHD, Gorilla Glass 4, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: jack audio da 3.5 mm, Lettore schede: micro-SD max. 128 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: accelerometro, sensore prossimità, sensore Hall, sensore geomagnetico, giroscopio
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900 MHz), UMTS (850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (700, 800, 850, 900, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2600 MHz), downloads/uploads up to 300/50 Mb/s, SAR 0.348 W/Kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.9 x 151.7 x 75
Batteria
3250 mAh ioni di litio, Quick Charge 3.0, Tempo conversazione 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 29 ore, Tempo conversazione 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 21 ore, Standby 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 530 ore, Standby 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 400 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 20 MPix f/1.8, dual-LED flash, PD auto-focus, stabilizzatore immagine OIS/EIS, HDR, videos max. 4K/30 FPS
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix f2/2, fix-focus, videos max. 1080p/30 FPS
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: casse stereo (Dolby Atmos), Tastiera: virtuale, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, alimentatore modulare, cavo USB Type-C, cuffie, custodia, tool slot SIM/micro-SD, adattatore micro-USB, guida rapida, garanzia, MiFavor 4.0, 36 Mesi Garanzia, USB Type-C, senza ventola
Peso
175 gr, Alimentazione: 35 gr
Prezzo
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
257 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s ∼10% -90%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼100% +12%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s ∼96% +8%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
298 MBit/s ∼89%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
256 MBit/s ∼76% -14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼33% -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s ∼9% -90%
ZTE Axon 7: Total route
ZTE Axon 7: Total route
ZTE Axon 7: Turning point
ZTE Axon 7: Turning point
ZTE Axon 7: Bridge
ZTE Axon 7: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
314
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 358 cd/m² Media: 334.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.75 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 88 %
Al centro con la batteria: 328 cd/m²
Contrasto: ∞:1 (Nero: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.29
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2
Screen
20%
11%
43%
33%
11%
23%
Brightness middle
328
658
101%
419
28%
509
55%
350
7%
784
139%
445
36%
Brightness
334
633
90%
431
29%
511
53%
351
5%
774
132%
434
30%
Brightness Distribution
88
93
6%
84
-5%
93
6%
98
11%
91
3%
93
6%
Black Level *
0.66
0.43
0.36
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.6
4.9
-7%
4.1
11%
2.2
52%
2.04
56%
6.5
-41%
2.8
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
14.7
9.1
38%
12
18%
5.8
61%
3.25
78%
11.7
20%
5.8
61%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
5.8
-107%
3.3
-18%
2
29%
1.63
42%
8
-186%
3.7
-32%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.26 97%
2.1 105%
2.25 98%
2.07 106%
2.22 99%
2.31 95%
CCT
6612 98%
7840 83%
6550 99%
6768 96%
6391 102%
8699 75%
7164 91%
Contrast
997
1823
1236
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
86.86
68.08
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.35
97.46

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms Incremento
↘ 1.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms Incremento
↘ 2.4 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 240.4 Hz ≤ 100 % settaggio luminosita'

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8665 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼49%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points ∼25% -49%
OnePlus 3
142090 Points ∼57% +16%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points ∼24% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points ∼51% +4%
LG G5
124244 Points ∼50% +1%
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼53% +8%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 3
5645 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy S7
6401 Points ∼17%
LG G5
5507 Points ∼15%
HTC 10
5117 Points ∼14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 3
2398 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2199 Points ∼45%
LG G5
2396 Points ∼49%
HTC 10
2376 Points ∼48%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼26%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼51% +92%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼43% +63%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points ∼39% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points ∼48% +83%
LG G5
1695 Points ∼41% +54%
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼36% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼56%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9% -84%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼56% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points ∼9% -84%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points ∼36% -35%
LG G5
4468 Points ∼54% -3%
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼55% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼42%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼13% -69%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼54% +27%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points ∼13% -69%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points ∼43% +1%
LG G5
3277 Points ∼51% +21%
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼49% +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼26%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼20% -22%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼28% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points ∼20% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points ∼25% -2%
LG G5
20997 Points ∼27% +3%
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼26% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3% -45%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼7% +40%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points ∼3% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points ∼7% +37%
LG G5
32109 Points ∼7% +32%
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼6% +24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼11%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7% -40%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼14% +30%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points ∼7% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points ∼14% +24%
LG G5
28730 Points ∼14% +23%
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼13% +17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps ∼5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼1% -74%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼5% +1%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼1% -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps ∼5% -5%
LG G5
74 fps ∼4% -16%
HTC 10
73 fps ∼4% -17%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps ∼12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼5% -60%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼13% +13%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼5% -57%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps ∼12% 0%
LG G5
47 fps ∼10% -11%
HTC 10
43 fps ∼9% -19%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps ∼7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% -75%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼9% +21%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼2% -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps ∼7% +3%
LG G5
42 fps ∼8% +8%
HTC 10
39 fps ∼7% 0%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps ∼8%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼3% -65%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼13% +64%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼3% -64%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps ∼7% -4%
LG G5
30 fps ∼8% +7%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼7% -14%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps ∼6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼1% -80%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps ∼1% -80%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps ∼5% -10%
LG G5
31 fps ∼6% 0%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼4% -23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps ∼9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼3% -62%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼17% +88%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps ∼4% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps ∼9% -6%
LG G5
17 fps ∼10% +6%
HTC 10
14 fps ∼8% -12%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼38%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼51% +37%
OnePlus 3
7101 Points ∼54% +43%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points ∼51% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points ∼37% -3%
LG G5
5581 Points ∼42% +12%
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼44% +17%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼56%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼41% -27%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼64% +15%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points ∼37% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points ∼55% -1%
LG G5
900 Points ∼52% -7%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼54% -4%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼29%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼6% -78%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼30% +4%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points ∼6% -78%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points ∼11% -63%
LG G5
4807 Points ∼30% +4%
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼32% +8%
Memory (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼31%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼22% -30%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼43% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼17% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points ∼47% +51%
LG G5
1478 Points ∼31% -1%
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼37% +19%
System (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼27%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼24% -12%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼29% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points ∼17% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points ∼35% +28%
LG G5
2925 Points ∼24% -12%
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼23% -15%
Overall (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼36%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼20% -44%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼41% +15%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points ∼17% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points ∼33% -8%
LG G5
2079 Points ∼34% -4%
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼36% +1%

Legenda

 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Honor 8 unknown, ARM Mali-T880 MP4,
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
8062 Points ∼16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4905 Points ∼10% -39%
OnePlus 3
9155 Points ∼18% +14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
4979 Points ∼10% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points ∼27% +63%
LG G5
9731 Points ∼20% +21%
HTC 10
8905 Points ∼18% +10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
3096.5 ms * ∼5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
8041.4 ms * ∼14% -160%
OnePlus 3
2920.7 ms * ∼5% +6%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
8168.9 ms * ∼14% -164%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2561.5 ms * ∼4% +17%
LG G5
3461.1 ms * ∼6% -12%
HTC 10
3146.3 ms * ∼5% -2%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
111 Points ∼14%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
84 Points ∼10% -24%
OnePlus 3
122 Points ∼15% +10%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
83 Points ∼10% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
166 Points ∼21% +50%
LG G5
108 Points ∼13% -3%
HTC 10
108 Points ∼13% -3%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Axon 7
44.754 Points ∼13%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
31.118 Points ∼9% -30%
OnePlus 3
54.4 Points ∼16% +22%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
31.8 Points ∼10% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points ∼22% +65%
LG G5
49.7 Points ∼15% +11%
HTC 10
52.1 Points ∼16% +16%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

ZTE Axon 7Huawei Honor 8Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KLOnePlus 3Lenovo Moto Z PlaySamsung Galaxy S7LG G5HTC 10
AndroBench 3-5
-17%
7%
3%
-3%
-6%
-17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.34
50.07
-2%
50.57
-1%
53.6
4%
45.53
-11%
65.44
27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.39
79.22
1%
74.58
-5%
72.33
-8%
78.53
0%
83.3
6%
Random Write 4KB
16.22
7.4
-54%
18.23
12%
45.58
181%
16.01
-1%
16.22
0%
15.89
-2%
Random Read 4KB
121.07
74
-39%
137.62
14%
38.78
-68%
85.9
-29%
89.26
-26%
29.92
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
150.92
188
25%
153.3
2%
73.14
-52%
145.72
-3%
141.26
-6%
115.56
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB
406.49
282
-31%
408.71
1%
254.78
-37%
483.82
19%
427.65
5%
275.09
-32%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high60 fps
Carico massimo
 39.1 °C39.5 °C37.5 °C 
 38.6 °C39.4 °C36.5 °C 
 37.3 °C38.4 °C36.1 °C 
Massima: 39.5 °C
Media: 38 °C
35 °C36.8 °C37.3 °C
35.4 °C37.3 °C37.4 °C
35.3 °C37.2 °C37.3 °C
Massima: 37.4 °C
Media: 36.6 °C
Alimentazione (max)  30.5 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.636.72525.432.83125.3294032.935.25033.649.76331.632.38028.429.31002725.712520.8281602239.120021.346.825020.855.631521.259.440019.463.250019.569.463017.772.580017.973.7100017.875.1125017.375.9160017.476.1200016.777.9250017.277.5315018.277.7400017.976.5500017.673.7630017.768.2800017.861.21000017.953.51250018.156.11600018.251SPL3087.1N1.366.1median 17.9median 68.2Delta1.311.735.432.335.235.428.226.137.828.228.63028.428.630.629.833.830.637.53739.537.529.329.434.329.328.426.927.328.432.229.130.832.238.426.526.238.441.22323.841.246.227.322.946.252.23322.452.2573819.95759.641.220.459.666.748.418.766.768.25117.768.270.25317.970.272.957.21872.973.857.117.873.873.255.11773.276.758.216.976.777.558.217.477.579.359.217.879.377.757.117.577.775.254.217.375.27858.817.3787253.4187264.646.318.364.663.245.517.963.253.33617.953.387.568.330.187.569.722.11.469.7median 68.2median 51median 17.9median 68.210.711.12.410.733.836.432.433.831.829.931.331.832.732.731.732.732.333.12632.345.446.139.445.429.630.736.229.629.525.228.629.525.923.125.425.925.623.421.325.637.124.723.337.150.127.122.550.156.234.622.456.261.840.421.361.864.74318.464.769.648.717.569.668.847.117.568.867.647.417.267.672.850.316.872.87552.217.37575.953.717.475.97652.116.67674.849.817.374.874.849.417.674.874.548.917.674.576.251.317.776.275.750.817.475.775.451.917.775.472.55117.972.571.150.518.171.164.247.518.164.286.462.729.886.46816.41.368median 71.1median 48.9median 17.7median 71.19.86.81.69.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseZTE Axon 7Samsung Galaxy S7LG G5
ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.05 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.45 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

LG G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.41 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.64 / 0.84 / 0.87 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 6.02 / 10.45 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-47%
-18%
29%
-1%
-40%
-44%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
0.83
-30%
0.57
11%
0.51
20%
0.68
-6%
0.55
14%
0.68
-6%
Idle Average *
0.84
2.11
-151%
1.24
-48%
0.87
-4%
1.02
-21%
1.37
-63%
1.49
-77%
Idle Maximum *
0.87
2.12
-144%
1.36
-56%
0.9
-3%
1.14
-31%
2.25
-159%
1.91
-120%
Load Average *
6.02
3.41
43%
5.92
2%
1.69
72%
4.73
21%
6.24
-4%
7.4
-23%
Load Maximum *
10.45
5.46
48%
10.53
-1%
4
62%
7.16
31%
9.12
13%
9.71
7%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
28ore 55minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6ore 51minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11ore 44minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
4ore 05minuti
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
39%
28%
95%
10%
-2%
-13%
Reader / Idle
1735
1502
-13%
1338
-23%
2540
46%
1810
4%
1833
6%
1273
-27%
H.264
704
905
29%
847
20%
1190
69%
892
27%
600
-15%
648
-8%
WiFi v1.3
411
797
94%
840
104%
824
100%
456
11%
387
-6%
413
0%
Load
245
352
44%
268
9%
652
166%
242
-1%
267
9%
203
-17%

Pro

+ Android 6.0
+ pannello QHD AMOLED
+ USB Type-C
+ scanner impronte digitali
+ ottimo modulo fotocamera
+ prestazioni molto elevate
+ nessun throttling
+ superbo suono Dolby Surround
+ Quick Charge

Contro

- insolita UI MiFavor 4.0
- solo USB 2.0
- PWM flickering
- batteria fissa
- autonomia mediocre
In review: ZTE Axon 7. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de.
In review: ZTE Axon 7. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de.

ZTE non ha promesso molto: l'Axon 7 è nella fascia alta degli smartphones, come il Samsung Galaxy S7 sebbene non riesca a reggere pianamente il confronto. Lo smartphone ZTE non ha il tocco finale - una porta USB veloce, un maggiore spazio interno, e una funzione di ricarica wireless l'avrebbero portato più in alto. Tuttavia, non impatta sulla configurazione e sulle prestazioni, comunque buone dell'Axon 7.

Lo ZTE Axon 7 non è solo un degno concorrente degli smartphones high-end come il Samsung Galaxy S7, convince anche con l'eccellente Dolby surround sound.

In particolare abbiamo apprezzato l'elevata qualità del case, il pannello QHD definito, l'ottima fotocamera, e le prestazioni più che sufficienti per ogni situazione smartphone durante il test. Chiunque cerchi uno smartphone con un ottimo suono deve solo scegliere lo ZTE Axon 7 in quanto per l'acustica batte di miglia i concorrenti con il suo suono Dolby-Atmos.

Lo ZTE Axon 7 ha anche qualcosa da criticare, ma nulla di grave. Alcuni utenti potrebbero non apprezzare l'aspetto dell'interfaccia utente MiFavor 4.0 - ma l'aspetto può essere modificato tramite app come un normale Android. Una porta USB più veloce avrebbe migliorato l'Axon 7 così come una migliore autonomia e una batteria removibile.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

ZTE Axon 7 - 10/31/2016 v5.1
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
90%
Tastiera
69 / 75 → 92%
Dispositivo di puntamento
92%
Connettività
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
90%
Batteria
91%
Display
84%
Prestazioni di gioco
60 / 63 → 95%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
58 / 70 → 83%
Temperatura
90%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Fotocamera
79%
Media
79%
87%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone ZTE Axon 7
Manuel Masiero, 2016-11- 7 (Update: 2016-11- 7)