Notebookcheck

Recensione dello Smartphone ZTE Blade V10 Vita: telefono a basse radiazioni

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 07/10/2019

Economico ma con un SoC esotico. Il fratello minore del Blade V10 ha un prezzo nettamente al di sotto dei 180 euro (~$203), offre un grande display, una buona dotazione di archiviazione e l'attuale Android 9.0 Pie, ma presenta alcuni compromessi per quanto riguarda la fotocamera.

ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Blade Serie)
Processore
UNISOC SC9863A
Scheda grafica
PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322
Memoria
3072 MB 
Schermo
6.26 pollici 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, 10 multi-touchpoints, TFT-LCD, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 56.98 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: Porta audio da 3.5 mm, Lettore schede: microSD fino a 256 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: sensore di posizione, sensore di prossimità, microUSB
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800, and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, and 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 7 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.1 x 157.1 x 75.8
Batteria
3200 mAh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix (f/2.0) + 2 MPix (Camera2 API Level: Limited)
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix (f/2.0, focus fisso)
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: cassa mono, Tastiera: onscreen, caricabatterie, cavo USB, auricolare, 24 Mesi Garanzia, SAR testa: 0,284 W/kg, SAR corpo: 0,556 W/kg, radio FM, senza ventola
Peso
153 gr, Alimentazione: 60 gr
Prezzo
179 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Confronto Dimensioni

159 mm 76.5 mm 8.2 mm 178 g158.92 mm 76.91 mm 8.1 mm 168 g157.1 mm 75.8 mm 8.1 mm 153 g154 mm 72 mm 8.9 mm 156 g148.95 mm 71.3 mm 8.39 mm 161 g147.4 mm 69.7 mm 8.4 mm 141 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=423)
224 MBit/s ∼100% +337%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 (min: 81, max: 129) MBit/s ∼57% +150%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
70 (min: 57, max: 83) MBit/s ∼31% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 47, max: 67) MBit/s ∼27% +17%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼23% +3%
Huawei Y7 2019
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.5 (min: 50, max: 54) MBit/s ∼23% +2%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
51.3 (min: 42, max: 55) MBit/s ∼23%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=423)
214 MBit/s ∼100% +486%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 90, max: 111) MBit/s ∼48% +179%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55 (min: 47, max: 62) MBit/s ∼26% +51%
Huawei Y7 2019
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.7 (min: 43, max: 52) MBit/s ∼22% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.7 (min: 23, max: 50) MBit/s ∼19% +9%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
36.5 (min: 21, max: 43) MBit/s ∼17%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼16% -4%
GPS Test: outdoors
GPS Test: indoors
GPS Test: GNSS supportato

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
Grafico di test
Grafico di test
Grafico di test in dettaglio
ColorChecker: il colore target è mostrato nella metà inferiore di ogni campo.
Grafico di test al buio (1 Lux)
440
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 478 cd/m² Media: 452.3 cd/m² Minimum: 6.77 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 92 %
Al centro con la batteria: 464 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1657:1 (Nero: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
92.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
TFT-LCD, 1520x720, 6.26
Huawei Y7 2019
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Nokia 4.2
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Samsung Galaxy A20e
IPS, 1560x720, 5.8
Sony Xperia L3
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Wiko View 3
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Screen
-39%
-51%
-79%
11%
-18%
Brightness middle
464
547
18%
445
-4%
475
2%
533
15%
574
24%
Brightness
452
543
20%
424
-6%
473
5%
533
18%
552
22%
Brightness Distribution
92
94
2%
91
-1%
93
1%
89
-3%
91
-1%
Black Level *
0.28
0.49
-75%
0.26
7%
0.35
-25%
0.25
11%
0.19
32%
Contrast
1657
1116
-33%
1712
3%
1357
-18%
2132
29%
3021
82%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.8
4.5
-61%
5.9
-111%
6.8
-143%
2.8
-0%
5.5
-96%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.1
7.9
-30%
9.3
-52%
13.4
-120%
5.1
16%
9.5
-56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
5
-150%
6.8
-240%
8.7
-335%
1.9
5%
5
-150%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.35 94%
2.2 100%
2.33 94%
2.11 104%
2.1 105%
CCT
6611 98%
7400 88%
8443 77%
9385 69%
6149 106%
7610 85%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9418 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
24.8 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 10.8 ms Incremento
↘ 14 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 40 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
54.8 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 26.8 ms Incremento
↘ 28 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 90 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (39.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2744 Points ∼59%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2940 Points ∼63% +7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3183 Points ∼68% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3271 Points ∼70% +19%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3015 Points ∼64% +10%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
2744 Points ∼59% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4676 Points ∼100% +70%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3526 Points ∼75%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3870 Points ∼83% +10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3267 Points ∼70% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3714 Points ∼79% +5%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3655 Points ∼78% +4%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
3526 Points ∼75% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=376)
4682 Points ∼100% +33%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
827 Points ∼59%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
761 Points ∼54% -8%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
891 Points ∼63% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1212 Points ∼86% +47%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
749 Points ∼53% -9%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
827 Points ∼59% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=376)
1413 Points ∼100% +71%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
4558 Points ∼86%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4499 Points ∼85% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4623 Points ∼87% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5305 Points ∼100% +16%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4912 Points ∼93% +8%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5135 Points ∼97% +13%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
4558 Points ∼86% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=367)
5225 Points ∼98% +15%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
6861 Points ∼99%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5431 Points ∼79% -21%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6228 Points ∼90% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6902 Points ∼100% +1%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6385 Points ∼92% -7%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6912 Points ∼100% +1%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
6861 Points ∼99% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=538)
5652 Points ∼82% -18%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
Points ∼0%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2096 Points ∼78%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2172 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2018 Points ∼75%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=54)
2680 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
Points ∼0%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
401 Points ∼15%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
401 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼18%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=54)
2699 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
Points ∼0%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
489 Points ∼20%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
490 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
598 Points ∼24%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=54)
2460 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1136 Points ∼59%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1779 Points ∼92% +57%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1500 Points ∼77% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1628 Points ∼84% +43%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
980 Points ∼51% -14%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
1136 Points ∼59% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=373)
1938 Points ∼100% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
376 Points ∼22%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
414 Points ∼24% +10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
413 Points ∼24% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
440 Points ∼26% +17%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
391 Points ∼23% +4%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
376 Points ∼22% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (75 - 8206, n=373)
1701 Points ∼100% +352%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
442 Points ∼28%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
499 Points ∼31% +13%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points ∼31% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
525 Points ∼33% +19%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
451 Points ∼28% +2%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
442 Points ∼28% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (93 - 6312, n=374)
1589 Points ∼100% +260%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1144 Points ∼62%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1765 Points ∼96% +54%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1516 Points ∼82% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1624 Points ∼88% +42%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
987 Points ∼53% -14%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
975 Points ∼53% -15%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
1144 Points ∼62% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=401)
1848 Points ∼100% +62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
629 Points ∼28%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
715 Points ∼32% +14%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
712 Points ∼32% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
659 Points ∼30% +5%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
663 Points ∼30% +5%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
452 Points ∼20% -28%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
629 Points ∼28% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (70 - 14951, n=401)
2227 Points ∼100% +254%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
699 Points ∼37%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
824 Points ∼43% +18%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
807 Points ∼42% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
759 Points ∼40% +9%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
715 Points ∼38% +2%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
513 Points ∼27% -27%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
699 Points ∼37% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (88 - 8141, n=401)
1905 Points ∼100% +173%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1108 Points ∼60%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1707 Points ∼93% +54%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1575 Points ∼85% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1630 Points ∼88% +47%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
998 Points ∼54% -10%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
1108 Points ∼60% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=452)
1844 Points ∼100% +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
297 Points ∼21%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
367 Points ∼26% +24%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼26% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
443 Points ∼32% +49%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
378 Points ∼27% +27%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
297 Points ∼21% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (53 - 6362, n=452)
1404 Points ∼100% +373%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
355 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
445 Points ∼33% +25%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
441 Points ∼32% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
526 Points ∼39% +48%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
439 Points ∼32% +24%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
355 Points ∼26% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (68 - 5734, n=453)
1357 Points ∼100% +282%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1101 Points ∼62%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1766 Points ∼100% +60%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1568 Points ∼89% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1646 Points ∼93% +50%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1026 Points ∼58% -7%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
943 Points ∼53% -14%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
1101 Points ∼62% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=494)
1714 Points ∼97% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
466 Points ∼25%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
704 Points ∼38% +51%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
704 Points ∼38% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
637 Points ∼35% +37%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
624 Points ∼34% +34%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
370 Points ∼20% -21%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
466 Points ∼25% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=493)
1844 Points ∼100% +296%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
535 Points ∼33%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
813 Points ∼51% +52%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
802 Points ∼50% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
737 Points ∼46% +38%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
684 Points ∼43% +28%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
428 Points ∼27% -20%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
535 Points ∼33% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=496)
1603 Points ∼100% +200%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
12578 Points ∼90%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13655 Points ∼97% +9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
12390 Points ∼88% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
12075 Points ∼86% -4%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11696 Points ∼83% -7%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
14036 Points ∼100% +12%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
12578 Points ∼90% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=653)
13917 Points ∼99% +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
9603 Points ∼47%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12281 Points ∼60% +28%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13440 Points ∼65% +40%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11427 Points ∼56% +19%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10008 Points ∼49% +4%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10689 Points ∼52% +11%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
9603 Points ∼47% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (536 - 162695, n=651)
20570 Points ∼100% +114%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
10136 Points ∼59%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12562 Points ∼74% +24%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13192 Points ∼77% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11565 Points ∼68% +14%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10340 Points ∼61% +2%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11287 Points ∼66% +11%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
10136 Points ∼59% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (662 - 83518, n=651)
17077 Points ∼100% +68%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
18 fps ∼50%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
22 fps ∼61% +22%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼64% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼56% +11%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
20 fps ∼56% +11%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
18 fps ∼50% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.5 - 251, n=675)
36 fps ∼100% +100%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
25 fps ∼74%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
33 fps ∼97% +32%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
31 fps ∼91% +24%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
27 fps ∼79% +8%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
25 fps ∼74% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=684)
27.6 fps ∼81% +10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
8.6 fps ∼42%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
9.3 fps ∼45% +8%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.8 fps ∼48% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼54% +28%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼49% +16%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
8.6 fps ∼42% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.8 - 132, n=581)
20.5 fps ∼100% +138%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
15 fps ∼75%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
17 fps ∼85% +13%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼90% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼100% +33%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼85% +13%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
15 fps ∼75% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=590)
18.9 fps ∼95% +26%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
5.7 fps ∼34%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼36% +7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼38% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.5 fps ∼39% +14%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.2 fps ∼37% +9%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
5.7 fps ∼34% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.87 - 88, n=447)
16.8 fps ∼100% +195%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
10 fps ∼62%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13 fps ∼80% +30%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼80% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
14 fps ∼86% +40%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11 fps ∼68% +10%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
10 fps ∼62% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=449)
16.2 fps ∼100% +62%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.6 fps ∼38%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.7 fps ∼39% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼42% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.8 fps ∼51% +33%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.3 fps ∼46% +19%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
3.6 fps ∼38% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.61 - 59, n=165)
9.37 fps ∼100% +160%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1.1 fps ∼17%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1.1 fps ∼17% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼18% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.4 fps ∼21% +27%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.6 fps ∼24% +45%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
1.1 fps ∼17% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.21 - 31, n=164)
6.54 fps ∼100% +495%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
5.8 fps ∼42%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼44% +5%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.6 fps ∼47% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
7.8 fps ∼56% +34%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼49% +17%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
5.8 fps ∼42% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.4 - 59, n=169)
13.9 fps ∼100% +140%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.2 fps ∼21%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼22% +6%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼24% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4 fps ∼26% +25%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼31% +47%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
3.2 fps ∼21% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.6 - 63, n=169)
15.3 fps ∼100% +378%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2.6 fps ∼23%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼30% +31%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.5 fps ∼30% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.2 fps ∼37% +62%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.9 fps ∼25% +12%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
2.6 fps ∼23% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.6 - 54, n=372)
11.5 fps ∼100% +342%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.8 fps ∼37%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.8 fps ∼65% +79%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼67% +84%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.6 fps ∼83% +126%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼45% +24%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
3.8 fps ∼37% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.1 - 58, n=376)
10.4 fps ∼100% +174%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4.41 fps ∼26%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.24 - 37.4, n=59)
17 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.62 fps ∼47%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.57 - 37.3, n=53)
14.2 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4.16 fps ∼24%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.88 - 39.7, n=50)
17.5 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
72796 Points ∼53%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
73468 Points ∼54% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
77652 Points ∼57% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
95464 Points ∼70% +31%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
77798 Points ∼57% +7%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
76398 Points ∼56% +5%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
72796 Points ∼53% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (17073 - 398720, n=283)
136819 Points ∼100% +88%
VRMark - Amber Room (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
Score ∼0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
552 Score ∼26%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=57)
2139 Score ∼100%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
765 Points ∼69%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
835 Points ∼75% +9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
834 Points ∼75% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1106 Points ∼100% +45%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
776 Points ∼70% +1%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
703 Points ∼64% -8%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
765 Points ∼69% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼68% -2%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
678 Points ∼34%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
964 Points ∼49% +42%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1000 Points ∼50% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
893 Points ∼45% +32%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
760 Points ∼38% +12%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
799 Points ∼40% +18%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
678 Points ∼34% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼100% +193%
Memory (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
790 Points ∼39%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1377 Points ∼69% +74%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1316 Points ∼66% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2008 Points ∼100% +154%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1247 Points ∼62% +58%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1019 Points ∼51% +29%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
790 Points ∼39% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼74% +88%
System (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2707 Points ∼80%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2879 Points ∼85% +6%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2687 Points ∼80% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3372 Points ∼100% +25%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2517 Points ∼75% -7%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2619 Points ∼78% -3%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
2707 Points ∼80% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼86% +7%
Overall (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1026 Points ∼64%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1337 Points ∼83% +30%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1310 Points ∼81% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1608 Points ∼100% +57%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1166 Points ∼73% +14%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1106 Points ∼69% +8%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
1026 Points ∼64% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=621)
1460 Points ∼91% +42%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
124 Points ∼17%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
133 Points ∼18% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
242 Points ∼33% +95%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
124 Points ∼17% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
730 Points ∼100% +489%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Media della classe Smartphone (9.13 - 108, n=94)
31.9 Points ∼100% +117%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.488 Points ∼67% +46%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
15.921 Points ∼50% +8%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
14.7 Points ∼46% 0%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
14.694 Points ∼46%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
14.579 Points ∼46% -1%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
13.684 Points ∼43% -7%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
12.933 Points ∼41% -12%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Media della classe Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=84)
34.9 runs/min ∼100% +163%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.63 runs/min ∼62% +63%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
18.23 runs/min ∼52% +37%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
14.7 runs/min ∼42% +11%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
14.6 runs/min ∼42% +10%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
13.3 runs/min ∼38% 0%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
13.26 runs/min ∼38%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Media della classe Smartphone (19 - 161, n=150)
64.2 Points ∼100% +101%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
48 Points ∼75% +50%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
38 Points ∼59% +19%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
34 Points ∼53% +6%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
32 Points ∼50%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
32 Points ∼50% 0%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
30 Points ∼47% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
7470 Points ∼100% +86%
Media della classe Smartphone (894 - 43280, n=677)
6450 Points ∼86% +61%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
4810 Points ∼64% +20%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
4422 Points ∼59% +10%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
4115 Points ∼55% +2%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
4114 Points ∼55% +2%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
4018 Points ∼54%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
4018 Points ∼54% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
11757.3 ms * ∼100% -1%
Media UNISOC SC9863A
11698 ms * ∼99% -0%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
11697.7 ms * ∼99%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
11184.8 ms * ∼95% +4%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
11012.1 ms * ∼94% +6%
Media della classe Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼91% +9%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
9768.3 ms * ∼83% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
5546.4 ms * ∼47% +53%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

ZTE Blade V10 VitaHuawei Y7 2019Nokia 4.2Samsung Galaxy A20eSony Xperia L3Wiko View 3Media 64 GB eMMC FlashMedia della classe Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
99%
-2%
88%
47%
63%
87%
60%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
61.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
63.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
57.6 (11.2 - 74.7, n=98)
-6%
49 (3.4 - 87.1, n=410)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
80.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
81.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
76.3 (21.1 - 87.2, n=98)
-6%
67.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=410)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
9.99
17.48
75%
4.31
-57%
13.18
32%
16.36
64%
8.98
-10%
24 (3.4 - 88.2, n=112)
140%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
113%
Random Read 4KB
20.32
83.53
311%
17.51
-14%
79.76
293%
28.83
42%
55.23
172%
54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=112)
167%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
127%
Sequential Write 256KB
119.45
88.77
-26%
18.17
-85%
103.57
-13%
87.52
-27%
132.39
11%
171 (40 - 246, n=112)
43%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB
95.57
305.05
219%
220.39
131%
300.36
214%
290.89
204%
287.32
201%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=112)
186%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
178%
PUBG (lowest detail settings)
0102030Tooltip
; 0.13.0: Ø24.7 (7-26)
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060Tooltip
; 1.5.5: Ø56.5 (50-58)
Carico massimo
 35 °C35.5 °C34.3 °C 
 35.8 °C36 °C34.9 °C 
 33.2 °C34.1 °C35 °C 
Massima: 36 °C
Media: 34.9 °C
33.2 °C34.2 °C35 °C
32.7 °C32.5 °C35.3 °C
31.8 °C33 °C34.2 °C
Massima: 35.3 °C
Media: 33.5 °C
Alimentazione (max)  27.9 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 34.9 °C / 95 F, rispetto alla media di 33.1 °C / 92 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Smartphone.
(+) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 36 °C / 97 F, rispetto alla media di 35.5 °C / 96 F, che varia da 22.4 a 51.7 °C per questa classe Smartphone.
(+) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 35.3 °C / 96 F, rispetto alla media di 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 27.5 °C / 82 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.740.92533.635.33134.3294033.830503934.26334.828.8803125.110030.229.412523.22616022.832.220022.633.425019.838.731520.144.440016.952.750016.859.363015.263.680015.859.2100015.869.8125014.571.416001573200014.172.7250015.372.1315014.973.1400014.974.8500014.772.6630014.770800014.972.81000014.875.11250015.363.91600015.449.3SPL27.883.9N155.4median 15.3median 63.9Delta2.113.732.233.727.830.124.123.224.926.333.337.123.827.926.226.726.228.817.422.417.23017.337.816.44516.248.315.755.214.663.816.36713.470.613.872.914.373.213.869.714.370.214.669.313.777.114.580.714.479.314.373.814.668.214.66514.557.414.842.626.786.70.862.2median 14.6median 671.413.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseZTE Blade V10 VitaHuawei Y7 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
ZTE Blade V10 Vita analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y7 2019 analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.69 / 2.03 / 2.06 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.55 / 6.15 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
3200 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2019
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Media UNISOC SC9863A
 
Media della classe Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
18%
21%
23%
23%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.74
-7%
0.51
26%
0.66
4%
0.57
17%
0.67
3%
Idle Average *
2.03
1.9
6%
1.7
16%
1.63
20%
1.5
26%
1.73
15%
Idle Maximum *
2.06
2.21
-7%
1.85
10%
1.67
19%
1.51
27%
1.79
13%
Load Average *
3.55
3.04
14%
3.17
11%
2.77
22%
3.09
13%
2.18
39%
Load Maximum *
6.15
4.15
33%
4.44
28%
3.66
40%
4.15
33%
3.43
44%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 75)
10ore 44minuti
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
3200 mAh
Huawei Y7 2019
4000 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
73%
8%
11%
0%
55%
Reader / Idle
2350
1432
2127
WiFi v1.3
644
1113
73%
696
8%
715
11%
641
0%
995
55%
Load
296
250
242
H.264
938
753
750

Pro

+ bassi valori di radiazione
+ costruzione decente
+ grande display con buona precisione del colore
+ molto spazio di archiviazione + supporto microSD
+ SIM ibrida
+ porta audio

Contro

- manca l'NFC
- altoparlante mediocre
- GPS impreciso
- nessuna certificazione DRM-L1

Giudizio Complessivo - Il Blade V10 Vita è un solido compagno per attività quotidiane

Recensione dello ZTE Blade V10 Vita. Modello di prova gentilmente fornito da cyberport.
Recensione dello ZTE Blade V10 Vita. Modello di prova gentilmente fornito da cyberport.

Lo ZTE Blade V10 Vita sta cercando di guadagnarsi un piccolo pezzo del competitivo segmento entry-level. Chi è alla ricerca di uno smartphone compatto con un grande display potrebbe essere molto soddisfatto di questo telefono. Soprattutto perché il pannello è già molto ben calibrato nello stato di consegna e offre un'ottima riproduzione dei colori. I valori SAR più bassi sono diventati rari a questo punto, e la fotocamera è abbastanza utilizzabile anche alla luce del giorno. Anche la memoria relativamente ampia, che può essere espansa opzionalmente tramite scheda microSD, meritano una menzione positiva, e anche il corrispondente supporto exFAT, che non è obbligatorio in questa fascia di prezzo.
    Lo ZTE Blade V10 Vita convince con un buon display e bassi valori di radiazione. Anche se le dotazioni sono solide, i giocatori dovrebbero lasciar perdere questo smartphone.

Solo coloro che amano giocare a giochi impegnativi sul proprio smartphone dovrebbero stare alla larga dalla ZTE Blade V10 Vita, poiché con l'unità grafica debole, giocare non sarà divertente. Inoltre, anche le capacità di localizzazione dello smartphone non sono riuscite a convincerci.

ZTE Blade V10 Vita - 07/04/2019 v6(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
81%
Tastiera
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositivo di puntamento
82%
Connettività
35 / 60 → 59%
Peso
92%
Batteria
93%
Display
88%
Prestazioni di gioco
21 / 63 → 34%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
46 / 70 → 65%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Fotocamera
46%
Media
69%
80%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione dello Smartphone ZTE Blade V10 Vita: telefono a basse radiazioni
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-07-10 (Update: 2019-07-10)