Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone ZTE Blade V8 Mini

Thomas Meyer (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 11/24/2017

Un economico smartphone con dual camera. Lo ZTE espande la gamma di dispositivi di fascia medio-bassa. Oltre allo ZTE Blade V8 64 GB, il produttore Cinese di smartphone ora introduce lo ZTE Blade V8 Mini nel mercato mobile. Il fratello inferiore dello ZTE Blade V8 costa solo 179 Euro (~$215, prezzo raccomandato; ancora non disponibile sul mercato americano). Monta una dual camera, un lettore di impronte ed Android 7.0.

ZTE Blade V8 Mini (Blade Serie)
Processore
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Scheda grafica
Qualcomm Adreno 505, Core: 450 MHz
Memoria
2048 MB 
Schermo
5 pollici 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3,5 mm, Lettore schede: MicroSD fino a 256 GB (usa uno slot SIM 2), 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensori: Sensore Accelerazione, Sensore Prossimità, Sensore Geomagnetico, WiFi Direct, OTG
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM:850/900/1800/1900 MHz, UMTS: 800/850/900/1900/2100 MHz, LTE:800/1800/2100/2600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 9 x 143 x 70
Batteria
2800 mAh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix Dual 13 MP + 2 MP, Autofocus, LED flash
Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Cavo USB, Caricatore, Cuffie Stereo, ZTE Service (device help), 24 Mesi Garanzia, SAR medio: 0.51 W/kg, senza ventola
Peso
149 gr, Alimentazione: 67 gr
Prezzo
179 Euro

 

The compact ZTE Blade V8 Mini sits comfortably in your hand
The back of the ZTE Blade V8 Mini is unfortunately very fingerprint-prone
The back of the ZTE Blade V8 Mini is embellished with a fingerprint scanner

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
122 MBit/s ∼100% +150%
ZTE Blade V8
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼45% +12%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.4 MBit/s ∼40% +1%
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.8 MBit/s ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 MBit/s ∼38% -4%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼100% +116%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s ∼48% +3%
ZTE Blade V8
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 MBit/s ∼48% +3%
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.9 MBit/s ∼46%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼45% -4%
GPS ZTE Blade V8 Mini
GPS ZTE Blade V8 Mini
GPS ZTE Blade V8 Mini
GPS ZTE Blade V8 Mini
GPS ZTE Blade V8 Mini
GPS ZTE Blade V8 Mini
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
388
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 415 cd/m² Media: 402.9 cd/m² Minimum: 8.44 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 93 %
Al centro con la batteria: 413 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1007:1 (Nero: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.31
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
1280x720, 5
ZTE Blade V8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Nokia 5
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
Gigaset GS170
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
PLS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
1%
10%
-20%
28%
Brightness
403
448
11%
635
58%
418
4%
494
23%
Brightness Distribution
93
79
-15%
90
-3%
92
-1%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.41
0.64
-56%
0.57
-39%
0.45
-10%
0.35
15%
Contrast
1007
753
-25%
1105
10%
929
-8%
1434
42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6
4
33%
5
17%
9.7
-62%
4.6
23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8
3.4
57%
6.9
14%
11.3
-41%
2.5
69%
Gamma
2.31 104%
2.13 113%
2.37 101%
2.27 106%
2.29 105%
CCT
7923 82%
6774 96%
8736 74%
10414 62%
6351 102%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2273 Hz3 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2273 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 3 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2273 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8581 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms Incremento
↘ 10.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms Incremento
↘ 18.4 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
45572 Points ∼20%
ZTE Blade V8
45868 Points ∼20% +1%
Nokia 5
45274 Points ∼20% -1%
Gigaset GS170
30144 Points ∼13% -34%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
35669 Points ∼16% -22%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
3606 Points ∼35%
ZTE Blade V8
3815 Points ∼37% +6%
Nokia 5
3807 Points ∼37% +6%
Gigaset GS170
2600 Points ∼25% -28%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3436 Points ∼33% -5%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
4481 Points ∼52%
ZTE Blade V8
4978 Points ∼58% +11%
Nokia 5
5060 Points ∼59% +13%
Gigaset GS170
3344 Points ∼39% -25%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8
744 Points ∼44%
Nokia 5
671 Points ∼40%
Gigaset GS170
558 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
662 Points ∼39%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8
787 Points ∼9%
Nokia 5
740 Points ∼8%
Gigaset GS170
210 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
252 Points ∼3%
Memory (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8
812 Points ∼18%
Nokia 5
788 Points ∼18%
Gigaset GS170
610 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1055 Points ∼24%
System (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8
1562 Points ∼15%
Nokia 5
2154 Points ∼21%
Gigaset GS170
1170 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1395 Points ∼14%
Overall (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8
928 Points ∼24%
Nokia 5
958 Points ∼25%
Gigaset GS170
538 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
704 Points ∼19%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1135 Points ∼13%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
2786 Points ∼11%
Nokia 5
2849 Points ∼11% +2%
Gigaset GS170
1595 Points ∼6% -43%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1858 Points ∼7% -33%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
675 Points ∼11%
Nokia 5
671 Points ∼11% -1%
Gigaset GS170
581 Points ∼10% -14%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
634 Points ∼11% -6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
1222 Points ∼40%
ZTE Blade V8
1214 Points ∼39% -1%
Nokia 5
1227 Points ∼40% 0%
Gigaset GS170
772 Points ∼25% -37%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
923 Points ∼30% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
265 Points ∼5%
ZTE Blade V8
263 Points ∼5% -1%
Nokia 5
245 Points ∼5% -8%
Gigaset GS170
74 Points ∼1% -72%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
63 Points ∼1% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
321 Points ∼8%
ZTE Blade V8
318 Points ∼8% -1%
Nokia 5
298 Points ∼8% -7%
Gigaset GS170
93 Points ∼2% -71%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
79 Points ∼2% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
1257 Points ∼41%
ZTE Blade V8
1127 Points ∼37% -10%
Nokia 5
1268 Points ∼41% +1%
Gigaset GS170
781 Points ∼25% -38%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
925 Points ∼30% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
534 Points ∼7%
ZTE Blade V8
542 Points ∼7% +1%
Nokia 5
503 Points ∼7% -6%
Gigaset GS170
227 Points ∼3% -57%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
92 Points ∼1% -83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
612 Points ∼12%
ZTE Blade V8
613 Points ∼12% 0%
Nokia 5
581 Points ∼12% -5%
Gigaset GS170
152 Points ∼3% -75%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
115 Points ∼2% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
8928 Points ∼12%
ZTE Blade V8
8905 Points ∼12% 0%
Nokia 5
9023 Points ∼13% +1%
Gigaset GS170
8178 Points ∼11% -8%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11426 Points ∼16% +28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
10302 Points ∼2%
ZTE Blade V8
10271 Points ∼2% 0%
Nokia 5
9684 Points ∼2% -6%
Gigaset GS170
3167 Points ∼1% -69%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3725 Points ∼1% -64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
9961 Points ∼5%
ZTE Blade V8
9932 Points ∼5% 0%
Nokia 5
9529 Points ∼5% -4%
Gigaset GS170
3666 Points ∼2% -63%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
4381 Points ∼2% -56%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
18 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V8
11 fps ∼1% -39%
Nokia 5
17 fps ∼1% -6%
Gigaset GS170
6 fps ∼0% -67%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
6.8 fps ∼0% -62%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
27 fps ∼6%
ZTE Blade V8
9.7 fps ∼2% -64%
Nokia 5
27 fps ∼6% 0%
Gigaset GS170
11 fps ∼2% -59%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11 fps ∼2% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
7.7 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V8
4.6 fps ∼1% -40%
Nokia 5
7.2 fps ∼1% -6%
Gigaset GS170
2.2 fps ∼0% -71%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2.6 fps ∼0% -66%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
15 fps ∼4%
ZTE Blade V8
4.5 fps ∼1% -70%
Nokia 5
14 fps ∼4% -7%
Gigaset GS170
4.8 fps ∼1% -68%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
5.4 fps ∼1% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
5 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V8
2.4 fps ∼1% -52%
Nokia 5
4.6 fps ∼1% -8%
Gigaset GS170
1.4 fps ∼0% -72%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1.7 fps ∼0% -66%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
11 fps ∼6%
ZTE Blade V8
4.9 fps ∼3% -55%
Nokia 5
10 fps ∼6% -9%
Gigaset GS170
3.4 fps ∼2% -69%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3.8 fps ∼2% -65%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
2.4 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V8
2.1 fps ∼1% -12%
Nokia 5
2.5 fps ∼1% +4%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
2.7 fps ∼0%
ZTE Blade V8
2.7 fps ∼0% 0%
Nokia 5
5.2 fps ∼0% +93%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
5.11 fps ∼13%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8
8015 Points ∼18%
Medium Quality (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
16733 Points ∼37%
ZTE Blade V8
16486 Points ∼37% -1%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordina per valore)
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
110 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade V8
110 Points ∼6% 0%

Legenda

 
ZTE Blade V8 Mini Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS170 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
21.48 Points ∼100% +18%
ZTE Blade V8 Mini (Chrome 62)
18.137 Points ∼84%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
17.524 Points ∼82% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
17.17 Points ∼80% -5%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
14.342 Points ∼67% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
3138 Points ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
2921 Points ∼93% +2%
ZTE Blade V8 Mini (Chrome 62)
2874 Points ∼92%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
2826 Points ∼90% -2%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
2284 Points ∼73% -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
16722.7 ms * ∼100% -35%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
12791 ms * ∼76% -3%
ZTE Blade V8 Mini (Chrome 62)
12382.8 ms * ∼74%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
12297.4 ms * ∼74% +1%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
10396 ms * ∼62% +16%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
60 Points ∼100%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
57 Points ∼95%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
53 Points ∼88%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

ZTE Blade V8 MiniSamsung Galaxy J3 2017ZTE Blade V8Gigaset GS170Nokia 5
AndroBench 3-5
-20%
19%
-39%
1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.6
2%
87.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50%
21.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-63%
62
7%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
70.3
-16%
96.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
15%
37.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-55%
83.9
0%
Random Write 4KB
10.89
9.5
-13%
12.69
17%
10.45
-4%
8.39
-23%
Random Read 4KB
27.49
24
-13%
39.89
45%
18.34
-33%
40.54
47%
Sequential Write 256KB
97.62
51
-48%
77.7
-20%
44.79
-54%
74.86
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB
262.28
177.7
-32%
278.06
6%
197.86
-25%
255.56
-3%
Carico massimo
 34.8 °C34.8 °C35.7 °C 
 34.6 °C34.5 °C36.3 °C 
 32.9 °C34 °C35.5 °C 
Massima: 36.3 °C
Media: 34.8 °C
32.3 °C32.5 °C33.1 °C
31.8 °C32.4 °C33 °C
31.8 °C32.7 °C32.5 °C
Massima: 33.1 °C
Media: 32.5 °C
Alimentazione (max)  27.3 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.241.62532.934.23137.235.74031.736.25039.632.86328.3308027.331.810026.930.512526.727.81602427.520020.931.325020.936.331519.542.540018.548.950017.558.663017.561.680015.765.1100015.871.7125016.674.6160015.874.1200015.475.3250015.573.931501671.4400015.869.250001668.6630016.371.9800016.374.51000016.276.41250016.472.11600016.461.3SPL28.684.4N1.156.4median 16.4ZTE Blade V8 Minimedian 68.6Delta2.114.931.640.625.43825.330.532.931.833.632.831.634.128.428.4272820.828.32226.521.331.620.838.521.246.819.453.419.556.717.760.217.960.617.870.417.372.217.471.416.768.317.268.818.267.517.973.117.674.217.771.217.862.817.956.918.15418.238.73081.81.347.9median 17.9ZTE Blade V8median 60.21.314.429.131.129.129.330.129.329.929.929.938.634.438.628.234.628.226.829.326.828.632.228.630.234.130.238.836.938.843.923.843.951.521.551.555.620.955.65921.35961.419.761.463.520.163.563.918.563.967.519.367.570.417.870.471.217.471.272.916.472.972.816.472.872.416.672.475.416.175.474.816.174.870.716.170.768.11668.167.316.167.36616.16658.81658.849.21649.283.630.183.655.71.455.7median 66Nokia 5median 17.4median 668.73.78.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
ZTE Blade V8 Mini audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

ZTE Blade V8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.17 / 0.83 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.21 / 2.26 / 2.27 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.89 / 5.96 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
2800 mAh
ZTE Blade V8
2730 mAh
Nokia 5
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Power Consumption
19%
25%
32%
21%
Idle Minimum *
1.21
0.98
19%
0.52
57%
0.54
55%
0.82
32%
Idle Average *
2.26
1.76
22%
1.78
21%
1.56
31%
1.94
14%
Idle Maximum *
2.27
1.79
21%
1.96
14%
1.6
30%
2.06
9%
Load Average *
3.89
2.89
26%
3.23
17%
3.18
18%
3.31
15%
Load Maximum *
5.96
5.62
6%
4.88
18%
4.42
26%
3.89
35%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
10ore 15minuti
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
2800 mAh
ZTE Blade V8
2730 mAh
Nokia 5
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
WiFi v1.3
615
700
14%
713
16%
442
-28%
722
17%

Pro

+ dual camera a poco prezzo
+ lettore impronte affidabile
+ dual-SIM opzionale

Contro

- processore relativamente lento
- regolazione della luminosità del display non è precisa
- le casse emettono un leggero rumore
Recensione: ZTE Blade V8 Mini. Dispositivo di test fornito da ZTE Germany.
Recensione: ZTE Blade V8 Mini. Dispositivo di test fornito da ZTE Germany.

Lo ZTE Blade V8 Mini offre una dual camera che funziona abbastanza bene, sebbene ci sia qualche problema con gli scatti bokeh. Tra le features ci sono LTE, la possibilità di usare due schede SIM, e un lettore di impronte affidabile. Inoltre ha una ampia autonomia e un buon case in policarbonato. Per appena 179 Euro (~$215, prezzo raccomandato; ancora non disponibile negli USA), il prezzo è davvero attraente.

Per appena 179 Euro (~$215, prezzo raccomandato), lo ZTE Blade V8 Mini offre una buona gamma di features ed anche una dual camera. D'altro canto, il processore non è particolarmente veloce - come succede sempre in questa fascia di prezzo.

I clienti dovranno fare qualche sacrificio in termini di processore, specialmente per quanto riguarda le capacità gaming del dispositivo. Il display da 5" sfortunatamente offre solo la risoluzione HD, e la regolazione automatica della luminosità a volte si fissa su livelli troppo alti. In termini di ricezione e qualità di chiamata, le prestazioni dello ZTE Blade V8 Mini sono forse un po' basse per collegamenti indoor mentre invece all'aperto non ci sono problemi.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

ZTE Blade V8 Mini - 11/08/2017 v6
Thomas Meyer

Chassis
83%
Tastiera
69 / 75 → 92%
Dispositivo di puntamento
88%
Connettività
29 / 60 → 48%
Peso
92%
Batteria
93%
Display
82%
Prestazioni di gioco
24 / 63 → 37%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
44 / 70 → 63%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Fotocamera
70%
Media
72%
82%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone ZTE Blade V8 Mini
Thomas Meyer, 2017-11-24 (Update: 2017-11-24)