Notebookcheck

Recensione breve delo Smartphone Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)

Manuel Masiero (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 11/09/2017

Realtà aumentato. L'Asus ZenFone AR combina Realtà Aumentata e Realtà Virtuale: e dopotutto è il primo smartphone ad avere certificazione Google Tango e Daydream. La domanda più interessante è se le funzioni AR- e VR giustificano un prezzo di circa $770.

Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Zenfone Serie)
Processore
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
Scheda grafica
Memoria
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Schermo
5.7 pollici 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 515 PPI, kapazitiv, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, 10-Finger-Multitouch, über 100% NTSC-Farbraumwiedergabe, 79% Screen-to-Body Ratio, lucido: si
Harddisk
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3.5-mm-Headsetbuchse, Lettore schede: microSD-Karten bis 2 TB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Beschleunigungssensor, Gyroskop, elektronischer Kompass, Näherungssensor, Umgebungslichtsensor, Hallsensor, RGB-Sensor, IR-Sensor (Laser-AF), Fingerabdrucksensor, Barometer, Wi-Fi Direct, Quick Charge 3.0, USB-OTG
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1.800/​1.900 MHz), UMTS (800, 850, 900, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.11 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41), Downloads bis zu 600 MBit/s, Uploads bis zu 75 MBit/s, Kopf-SAR 0,85 W/Kg, Körper-SAR 1,59 W/kg, Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.95 x 158.7 x 77.7
Batteria
3300 mAh ioni di litio, BoostMaster-Schnellladefunktion: 60% Akku in 39 Minuten (18W) laut Hersteller
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 23 MPix Sony IMX318, 1,0 µm Pixelgröße, f/2.0, 27 mm Brennweite, 6-Elemente-Linse, 4-stufiger optischer Bildstabilisator (OIS), 3-achsiger elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS), Dual-LED Zweifarbblitz, 4K-Videoaufnahmen mit 30 fps
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix OmniVision 8856, 1,12 µm Pixelgröße, f/2.0, Display-Blitz
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Mono-Lautsprecher, Tastiera: virtuell, Netzteil (9V, 2A), USB-C-Kabel, USB-C- auf USB-A-2.0-Adapter, Kopfhörer, Dokumentation (Anleitung, Garantiekarte), ASUS ZenUI 3.0, 24 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
170 gr, Alimentazione: 40 gr
Prezzo
899 Euro

 

Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
915 MBit/s ∼100% +169%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼41% +9%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
340 MBit/s ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 MBit/s ∼36% -3%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼36% -4%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 64 GB eMMC Flash
313 MBit/s ∼34% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼100% +118%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼83% +80%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
354 MBit/s ∼54% +18%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
299 MBit/s ∼46%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 64 GB eMMC Flash
261 MBit/s ∼40% -13%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼34% -26%
Asus ZenFone AR: overview
Asus ZenFone AR: overview
Asus ZenFone AR: overpass
Asus ZenFone AR: overpass
Asus ZenFone AR: turning point
Asus ZenFone AR: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overpass
Garmin Edge 500: overpass
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
362
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 362 cd/m² Media: 340.9 cd/m² Minimum: 7.06 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 90 %
Al centro con la batteria: 338 cd/m²
Contrasto: ∞:1 (Nero: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.25
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 6.4
Apple iPhone 8
IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-27%
52%
9%
33%
38%
Brightness
341
479
40%
580
70%
611
79%
564
65%
431
26%
Brightness Distribution
90
93
3%
91
1%
89
-1%
94
4%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.482
0.44
0.23
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.7
7
-89%
1.2
68%
4.5
-22%
2.7
27%
1.6
57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.9
7.9
-61%
1.6
67%
6
-22%
3.1
37%
1.7
65%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.34 103%
2.25 107%
2.27 106%
2.15 112%
2.25 107%
CCT
7286 89%
7826 83%
6688 97%
7996 81%
6335 103%
6329 103%
Contrast
980
1373
2809
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05
99.87

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 231.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 231.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 231.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 55 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 247500) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms Incremento
↘ 2 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms Incremento
↘ 2.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.6 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
150228 Points ∼66%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
85438 Points ∼37% -43%
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points ∼90% +36%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points ∼75% +14%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼78% +18%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
5972 Points ∼58%
LG G6
5152 Points ∼50% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points ∼52% -10%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% +10%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
6318 Points ∼75%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼68% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points ∼72% -4%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼93% +24%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
985 Points ∼58%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
966 Points ∼57% -2%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼63% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points ∼68% +17%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼76% +31%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4649 Points ∼54%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1623 Points ∼19% -65%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼60% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points ∼71% +31%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼71% +32%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1948 Points ∼44%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1940 Points ∼44% 0%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼44% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points ∼69% +56%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +127%
System (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3220 Points ∼49%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
2297 Points ∼35% -29%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼55% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points ∼82% +67%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼90% +83%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2315 Points ∼61%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1626 Points ∼43% -30%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼66% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points ∼86% +42%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼100% +64%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
LG G6
7080 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S8
8490 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼93%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4359 Points ∼17%
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼41% +138%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼17% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points ∼27% +54%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼27% +56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1891 Points ∼32%
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼70% +120%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼31% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points ∼34% +6%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +4%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1787 Points ∼59%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
2014 Points ∼67% +13%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼66% +11%
LG G6
1955 Points ∼65% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points ∼82% +40%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼100% +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2767 Points ∼51%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
755 Points ∼14% -73%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼48% -7%
LG G6
2980 Points ∼55% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points ∼64% +25%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2466 Points ∼63%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
877 Points ∼23% -64%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼62% -2%
LG G6
2669 Points ∼69% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points ∼82% +30%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼92% +45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1721 Points ∼57%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1844 Points ∼61% +7%
Apple iPhone 8
1774 Points ∼59% +3%
LG G6
1961 Points ∼65% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points ∼81% +42%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼100% +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4354 Points ∼56%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1271 Points ∼16% -71%
LG G6
4121 Points ∼53% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points ∼64% +13%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼62% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3249 Points ∼65%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1365 Points ∼27% -58%
LG G6
3282 Points ∼66% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points ∼81% +24%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼85% +30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
22750 Points ∼32%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
11364 Points ∼16% -50%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼34% +6%
LG G6
22335 Points ∼31% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points ∼30% -5%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼27% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
34038 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
21103 Points ∼5% -38%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼25% +230%
LG G6
32128 Points ∼7% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points ∼8% +7%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼13% +70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
30658 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
17727 Points ∼9% -42%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼31% +102%
LG G6
29276 Points ∼15% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points ∼16% +3%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼20% +31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
87 fps ∼7%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
22 fps ∼2% -75%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼12% +85%
LG G6
75 fps ∼6% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps ∼9% +39%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼9% +32%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
51 fps ∼11%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
33 fps ∼7% -35%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼26% +135%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps ∼13% +18%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼13% +18%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
45 fps ∼8%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
14 fps ∼3% -69%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼13% +57%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps ∼11% +38%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +36%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
28 fps ∼8%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
8.6 fps ∼2% -69%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼31% +309%
LG G6
27 fps ∼7% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps ∼11% +46%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15% +100%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
16 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
9.2 fps ∼2% -42%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼13% +238%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% +81%
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps ∼6% +50%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼10% +163%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
15 fps ∼9%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
4.7 fps ∼3% -69%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼62% +631%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps ∼13% +53%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼23% +173%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
19 fps ∼5%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
3.2 fps ∼1% -83%
LG G6
20 fps ∼6% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps ∼7% +32%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼7% +32%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
11 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
5.4 fps ∼0% -51%
LG G6
11 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps ∼0% +18%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼1% +127%

Legenda

 
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼100% +263%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼35% +26%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
65.846 Points ∼32% +16%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
56.931 Points ∼28%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
56.628 Points ∼27% -1%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
50.703 Points ∼25% -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼100% +246%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
12941 Points ∼38% +31%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼35% +21%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
9863 Points ∼29%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
9113 Points ∼27% -8%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
8837 Points ∼26% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
3597.8 ms * ∼100% -48%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼73% -8%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
2464.2 ms * ∼68% -2%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
2423.1 ms * ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
1886.6 ms * ∼52% +22%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼20% +70%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼100% +153%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
194 Points ∼54% +37%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼45% +13%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
142 Points ∼40%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
122 Points ∼34% -14%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
111 Points ∼31% -22%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KLLenovo Phab 2 ProLG G6Samsung Galaxy S8OnePlus 5
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
-2%
21%
52%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
53.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
53.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
77.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
63.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
13.51
12.92
-4%
16.58
23%
15.25
13%
19.3
43%
Random Read 4KB
88.44
38.53
-56%
95.19
8%
127.17
44%
141
59%
Sequential Write 256KB
142.82
138.01
-3%
122.85
-14%
193.23
35%
201.5
41%
Sequential Read 256KB
458.91
254.99
-44%
428.67
-7%
792.86
73%
748
63%
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high56 fps
in confronto
Motorola Moto X Play (min)
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
20
   ...
Huawei P10 Plus
 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
56
Huawei Nova 2
 Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
56
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
 821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
56
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
57
Honor 6X
 Kirin 655, Mali-T830 MP2
57
   ...
Nokia 8 (max)
 835, Adreno 540
60
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Carico massimo
 37.1 °C36.5 °C33.6 °C 
 37.8 °C37.6 °C32.7 °C 
 35.8 °C35.2 °C32.5 °C 
Massima: 37.8 °C
Media: 35.4 °C
31.8 °C34.2 °C36 °C
31.9 °C34.5 °C37.9 °C
30.3 °C36.6 °C35.1 °C
Massima: 37.9 °C
Media: 34.3 °C
Alimentazione (max)  25.3 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.241.62532.941.13137.240.34031.736.25039.636.56328.336.28027.334.510026.931.512526.731.71602439.320020.947.325020.951.231519.55940018.559.850017.563.263017.560.680015.762.3100015.868.8125016.669.4160015.868200015.468.5250015.570.931501672.6400015.87550001684.3630016.381.6800016.376.81000016.275.41250016.474.11600016.455.6SPL28.688.4N1.165median 16.4Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KLmedian 68Delta2.19.637.636.234.835.333.734.333.933.833.333.531.331.232.230.629.72930.631.127.441.326.850.42654.824.858.323.960.923.464.422.768.622.46722.667.92267.121.763.821.563.821.26821.172.120.978.220.978.32172.72171.121.272.32168.421.257.73484.52.256.8median 22Lenovo Phab 2 Promedian 671.86.631.639.125.437.625.336.932.940.833.635.231.633.328.433.82733.520.842.82250.821.351.520.849.821.253.919.45619.558.717.761.617.962.917.866.217.368.217.468.416.768.517.267.318.26817.969.817.668.817.767.517.861.717.959.118.160.618.256.23078.41.343.6median 17.9Apple iPhone 8median 61.61.37.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Phab 2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.46 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.88 / 1.24 / 1.26 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 7.71 / 8.64 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3300 mAh
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
4050 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-147%
10%
1%
23%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.88
3
-241%
0.54
39%
0.62
30%
0.78
11%
0.73
17%
Idle Average *
1.24
4.1
-231%
1.63
-31%
1.43
-15%
1.1
11%
1.44
-16%
Idle Maximum *
1.26
4.2
-233%
1.67
-33%
1.48
-17%
1.16
8%
1.5
-19%
Load Average *
7.71
10.4
-35%
2.74
64%
5.52
28%
4.15
46%
6.91
10%
Load Maximum *
8.64
8.1
6%
7.78
10%
10.47
-21%
5.12
41%
8.51
2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
24ore 36minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
7ore 24minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10ore 36minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
3ore 41minuti
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3300 mAh
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
4050 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
-9%
11%
28%
29%
8%
Reader / Idle
1476
1119
-24%
1629
10%
1789
21%
1667
13%
1534
4%
H.264
636
567
-11%
698
10%
779
22%
771
21%
623
-2%
WiFi v1.3
444
508
14%
585
32%
692
56%
719
62%
518
17%
Load
221
190
-14%
202
-9%
252
14%
264
19%
247
12%

Pro

+ compatibilità AR e VR
+ case robusto e di alta qualità
+ spazio UFS 2.0 veloce
+ LTE Cat. 11
+ display WQHD OLED
+ fotocamera decente
+ prestazioni elevate

Contro

- molto costoso
- solo poche apps Tango disponibili
- manca uno slot ibrido Dual-SIM
- autonomia breve
In review: Asus ZenFone AR. Review unit courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ZenFone AR. Review unit courtesy of Asus Germany.

Non ci sono dubbi: lo ZenFone AR è il primo smartphone ad usare la realtà aumentata Google con le apps Tango in modo fluido. Tuttavia, considerata la scarsa disponibilità di apps (circa 30) - la maggioranza delle quali sono poca roba - attualmente il fattore Tango non risulta essere ancora un must-have. La domanda è: volete spendere quasi $800 oltre le tasse per questa limitata esperienza AR? Sospettiamo che la maggioranza degli utenti, Tango non è un fattore importante nel considerare lo ZenFone AR, specialmente in quanto le lenti Google Daydream VR non sono incluse e devono essere comprate separatamente.

Comprare lo ZenFone AR solo per il Google Tango non vale la pena. Realtà aumentata a parte, resta uno smartphone decente ma costoso.

Per quasi la metà del suo prezzo, l'LG G6 è veloce quasi quanto lo ZenFone AR. Anche l'Asus TriCam non riesce ad impressionarci. Si, le foto sono sicuramente decenti, ma lontane dalla perfezione. In aggiunta, l'autonomia è molto breve e lo ZenFone AR si scarica abbastanza velocemente.

In definitiva l'Asus ZenFone AR è uno smartphone high-quality, ben costruito con display WQHD OLED, con prestazioni più che adeguate per il quotidiano e per usare apps e giochi, inoltre i moduli di comunicazione sono molto veloci.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL - 11/02/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
86%
Tastiera
72 / 75 → 95%
Dispositivo di puntamento
93%
Connettività
48 / 60 → 79%
Peso
91%
Batteria
91%
Display
84%
Prestazioni di gioco
60 / 63 → 95%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
61 / 70 → 87%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Fotocamera
82%
Media
79%
87%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve delo Smartphone Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Manuel Masiero, 2017-11- 9 (Update: 2017-11- 9)