Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone LG K10 (2017)

Florian Wimmer (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 04/23/2017

Potenza per la gente. L'LG K10 (2017) ha maggiore potenza rispetto al suo predecessore e inoltre è stato dotato di un case di qualità ancora migliore. Perfomance elevate per poco più di 200 euro (~ $ 212), ma ovviamente approfondiremo con attenzione lo smartphone nel test.

LG K10 2017 (K Serie)
Processore
Mediatek MT6750, Mediatek MT6750
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoria
2048 MB 
Schermo
5.3 pollici 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 277 PPI, kapazitiver Touchscreen, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3,5mm-Headsetport, Lettore schede: microSD bis 256 GB, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Beschleunigungssensor, Annäherungssensor, Kompass, USB-OTG
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20); Bandbreite (Download/​Upload): 300Mbps/​50Mbps; SAR-Wert: 0,541 W/kg (Kopf), 1,310 W/kg (Körper), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.99 x 148.7 x 75.3
Batteria
10.8 Wh, 2800 mAh ioni di litio, removibile, Tempo conversazione 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 7 ore, Tempo conversazione 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 14 ore, Standby 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 370 ore, Standby 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 361 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix f/​2.2, Kontrast-AF, LED-Blitz, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix Videos @1080p, Weitwinkel
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Lautsprecher an der Rückseite, Tastiera: virtuelles Keyboard, Ladegerät, Ladekabel, Headset, LG SmartWorld, Remote Call Service, LG Backup, 24 Mesi Garanzia, UKW-Radio, senza ventola
Peso
138 gr, Alimentazione: 49 gr
Prezzo
209 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼100% +121%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 MBit/s ∼46% +3%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.2 MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼100% +100%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s ∼50%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.7 MBit/s ∼46% -9%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500: junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS LG K10: overview
GPS LG K10: overview
GPS LG K10: junction
GPS LG K10: junction
GPS LG K10: bridge
GPS LG K10: bridge

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
332
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 384 cd/m² Media: 349.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.07 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 85 %
Al centro con la batteria: 384 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1067:1 (Nero: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2
LG K10 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5
HTC One A9s
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
LG K10
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Screen
5%
-1%
24%
3%
2%
Brightness
350
299
-15%
414
18%
320
-9%
474
35%
355
1%
Brightness Distribution
85
96
13%
94
11%
85
0%
85
0%
92
8%
Black Level *
0.36
0.42
-17%
0.23
36%
0.53
-47%
0.28
22%
Contrast
1067
981
-8%
1513
42%
957
-10%
1321
24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6
5.8
3%
5.6
7%
3.5
42%
4.7
22%
6.7
-12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.9
4.8
19%
6.9
-17%
4
32%
4.8
19%
7.9
-34%
Gamma
2 120%
1.84 130%
2.4 100%
2.3 104%
2.25 107%
2.21 109%
CCT
8042 81%
6252 104%
8422 77%
6527 100%
6441 101%
9072 72%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 55 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8622 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms Incremento
↘ 14 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms Incremento
↘ 25 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
39063 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
24748 Points ∼11% -37%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points ∼12% -27%
HTC One A9s
51330 Points ∼23% +31%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
30365 Points ∼13% -22%
LG K10
27383 Points ∼12% -30%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
1047 Points ∼34%
HTC One A9s
1175 Points ∼38% +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
699 Points ∼23% -33%
LG K10
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
252 Points ∼5%
HTC One A9s
359 Points ∼7% +42%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
83 Points ∼2% -67%
LG K10
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
303 Points ∼8%
HTC One A9s
425 Points ∼11% +40%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
103 Points ∼3% -66%
LG K10
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
1105 Points ∼36%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points ∼23% -35%
HTC One A9s
1269 Points ∼41% +15%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
741 Points ∼24% -33%
LG K10
730 Points ∼24% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
380 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points ∼1% -89%
HTC One A9s
524 Points ∼7% +38%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
128 Points ∼2% -66%
LG K10
41 Points ∼1% -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
445 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points ∼1% -88%
HTC One A9s
603 Points ∼12% +36%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
157 Points ∼3% -65%
LG K10
52 Points ∼1% -88%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
8223 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
8322 Points ∼12% +1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points ∼13% +13%
HTC One A9s
12025 Points ∼17% +46%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
7298 Points ∼10% -11%
LG K10
9106 Points ∼13% +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
7936 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3037 Points ∼1% -62%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points ∼1% -51%
HTC One A9s
10453 Points ∼2% +32%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3369 Points ∼1% -58%
LG K10
3774 Points ∼1% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
7998 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3535 Points ∼2% -56%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points ∼2% -45%
HTC One A9s
10766 Points ∼5% +35%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3827 Points ∼2% -52%
LG K10
4339 Points ∼2% -46%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
13 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
4.6 fps ∼0% -65%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps ∼0% -60%
HTC One A9s
18 fps ∼1% +38%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
5.9 fps ∼0% -55%
LG K10
5.2 fps ∼0% -60%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
22 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7.6 fps ∼2% -65%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps ∼2% -56%
HTC One A9s
27 fps ∼6% +23%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
10 fps ∼2% -55%
LG K10
9.7 fps ∼2% -56%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
5.3 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps ∼0% -66%
HTC One A9s
7.2 fps ∼1% +36%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2.2 fps ∼0% -58%
LG K10
1.8 fps ∼0% -66%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
11 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps ∼1% -63%
HTC One A9s
14 fps ∼4% +27%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4.7 fps ∼1% -57%
LG K10
4.1 fps ∼1% -63%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
3.5 fps ∼1%
HTC One A9s
2.6 fps ∼1% -26%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1.4 fps ∼0% -60%
LG K10
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
8.6 fps ∼5%
HTC One A9s
11 fps ∼6% +28%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3.4 fps ∼2% -60%
LG K10
fps ∼0% -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
3167 Points ∼31%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
1137 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
569 Points ∼34% -50%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points ∼32% -52%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
703 Points ∼41% -38%
LG K10
562 Points ∼33% -51%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
508 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
158 Points ∼2% -69%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points ∼3% -38%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
210 Points ∼2% -59%
LG K10
310 Points ∼3% -39%
Memory (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
623 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
315 Points ∼7% -49%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points ∼17% +19%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
780 Points ∼18% +25%
LG K10
453 Points ∼10% -27%
System (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
1259 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1134 Points ∼11% -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points ∼10% -18%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1041 Points ∼10% -17%
LG K10
1050 Points ∼10% -17%
Overall (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
821 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
423 Points ∼11% -48%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points ∼16% -27%
HTC One A9s
Points ∼0% -100%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
588 Points ∼16% -28%
LG K10
536 Points ∼14% -35%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
1480 Points ∼17%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
2311 Points ∼9%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
593 Points ∼10%

Legenda

 
LG K10 2017 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One A9s Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
3407 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2842 Points ∼6% -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points ∼6% -19%
HTC One A9s
4395 Points ∼9% +29%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2534 Points ∼5% -26%
LG K10
2838 Points ∼6% -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
11708.2 ms * ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
13701.5 ms * ∼23% -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12952.9 ms * ∼22% -11%
HTC One A9s
9346 ms * ∼16% +20%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
14983 ms * ∼25% -28%
LG K10
16638 ms * ∼28% -42%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
20.838 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.2 Points ∼0% -22%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.094 Points ∼0% -18%
HTC One A9s
27.48 Points ∼0% +32%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
16.471 Points ∼0% -21%
LG K10
17.478 Points ∼0% -16%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
61.63 MB/s ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
18.7 MB/s ∼21% -70%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
51.1 MB/s ∼59% -17%
HTC One A9s
25.6 MB/s ∼29% -58%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
29.59 MB/s ∼34% -52%
LG K10
45 MB/s ∼52% -27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
77.4 MB/s ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
20.82 MB/s ∼22% -73%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
65.5 MB/s ∼68% -15%
HTC One A9s
39.6 MB/s ∼41% -49%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
47.67 MB/s ∼49% -38%
LG K10
75.47 MB/s ∼78% -2%
Random Write 4KB (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
10.8 MB/s ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
9.43 MB/s ∼6% -13%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28.31 MB/s ∼17% +162%
HTC One A9s
34.6 MB/s ∼21% +220%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
9.1 MB/s ∼6% -16%
LG K10
7.5 MB/s ∼5% -31%
Random Read 4KB (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
25.1 MB/s ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.82 MB/s ∼10% -33%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.9 MB/s ∼10% -29%
HTC One A9s
21.3 MB/s ∼12% -15%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
20.9 MB/s ∼12% -17%
LG K10
9.2 MB/s ∼5% -63%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
43.6 MB/s ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
41.4 MB/s ∼20% -5%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
43.95 MB/s ∼21% +1%
HTC One A9s
68.6 MB/s ∼33% +57%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
65.15 MB/s ∼31% +49%
LG K10
78 MB/s ∼37% +79%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordina per valore)
LG K10 2017
246.1 MB/s ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
64.42 MB/s ∼8% -74%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
144.12 MB/s ∼18% -41%
HTC One A9s
210.2 MB/s ∼26% -15%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
174.2 MB/s ∼22% -29%
LG K10
131 MB/s ∼16% -47%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high51 fps
Carico massimo
 39.6 °C40.1 °C35.1 °C 
 39.2 °C40.1 °C35.6 °C 
 37.2 °C37.7 °C33.8 °C 
Massima: 40.1 °C
Media: 37.6 °C
32.8 °C34.7 °C41.2 °C
33.3 °C34.2 °C41.3 °C
33.7 °C34.3 °C37.5 °C
Massima: 41.3 °C
Media: 35.9 °C
Alimentazione (max)  35.9 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6452525.440.63125.334.94032.931.85033.632.86331.632.58028.428.2100272812520.828.81602227.820021.325.525020.826.631521.226.640019.436.250019.543.363017.750.480017.957.4100017.864.8125017.371.9160017.475.3200016.776.7250017.276.5315018.273.7400017.972500017.668.3630017.766.9800017.869.91000017.967.31250018.160.21600018.254.7SPL3084.3N1.348.9median 17.9LG K10 2017median 60.2Delta1.317.927.628.827.626.626.426.625.726.325.727.725.127.727.924.827.922.825.422.824.223.224.227.123.527.136.930.936.935.12035.141.519.941.546.921.746.953.124.253.15521.25556.421.156.457.617.957.659.32059.362.520.462.567.918.167.968.414.868.470.51670.572.914.972.974.814.474.875.213.975.272.213.372.267.912.867.968.812.968.858.312.958.350.613.250.644.912.844.982.629.282.648.71.248.7median 58.3HTC One A9smedian 17.9median 58.310.83.610.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
LG K10 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.34 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC One A9s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.17 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.76 / 1.59 / 1.61 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.24 / 4.15 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
HTC One A9s
2300 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Power Consumption
16%
3%
-47%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
0.76
0.96
-26%
0.68
11%
1.29
-70%
0.74
3%
Idle Average *
1.59
1.14
28%
1.58
1%
2.28
-43%
2.04
-28%
Idle Maximum *
1.61
1.23
24%
1.61
-0%
2.52
-57%
2.22
-38%
Load Average *
3.24
2.45
24%
3.36
-4%
4.06
-25%
5.57
-72%
Load Maximum *
4.15
2.92
30%
3.91
6%
5.91
-42%
6.59
-59%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
24ore 37minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
8ore 52minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10ore 13minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
4ore 58minuti
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
HTC One A9s
2300 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
LG K10
2300 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
4%
17%
-5%
23%
-16%
Reader / Idle
1477
1212
-18%
1998
35%
1543
4%
1462
-1%
1123
-24%
H.264
613
590
-4%
683
11%
587
-4%
845
38%
603
-2%
WiFi v1.3
532
502
-6%
630
18%
517
-3%
814
53%
453
-15%
Load
298
433
45%
306
3%
245
-18%
301
1%
231
-22%

Pro

+ qualità del case
+ batteria removibile
+ decente autonomia
+ prestazioni elevate
+ NFC e USB-OTG
+ attuale Android 7
+ immagini della fotocamera definite

Contro

- prestazioni scarse della fotocamera in assenza di luce
- qualtà media del microfono
- cassa
- schermo poco luminoso

L'LG K10 (2017) ha sicuramente gestito una cosa: è un chiaro progresso rispetto al suo predecessore. Il case è diventato ancora più snello e più di alta qualità, la batteria dura notevolmente più a lungo ed ha una maggiore potenza sotto il cofano. Questo aumento di potenza è così evidente, che molti dispositivi concorrenti sono anche superati dall'LG K10 (2017). Solo l' HTC One A9s possiede ancora più riserve di potenza, tuttavia, tale dispositivo appartiene a una fascia di prezzo diversa.

Naturalmente c'è qualcosa da lamentarsi: l'altoparlante emette un suono stridente, il che rende la modalità vivavoce difficile da usare. Allo stesso modo il microfono è di qualità mediocre e lo schermo potrebbe essere più luminoso. Ma in realtà, ci sono anche aspetti positivi: il sistema operativo è aggiornato, il consumo energetico va bene, la fotocamera fa foto piuttosto buone e l'LG K10 (2017) si maneggia bene.

Le alte performance e la batteria rimovibile sono i punti culminanti dell'LG K10 (2017). Anche la qualità del case in plastica lascia una buona impressione. In termini di suono, il LG potrebbe fare meglio, ma nel complesso, il LG K10 (2017) è un buon budget smartphone.

Nel complesso, una chiara raccomandazione per LG K10 (2017). Solo qualcuno che abbia assolutamente bisogno di una maggiore capacità della batteria prenderà l'Asus Zenfone 3 Max, ma dovrebbe considerare che, contrariamente all'LG K10 (2017), la batteria non può essere rimossa. Lo stesso vale per l'HTC One A9s, col quale si ottengono ancora più perfomance. Ma comunque, l'LG K10 (2017) è un ottimo affare attualmente a meno di 200 euro (~ 212 dollari).

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

In review: LG K10 (2017). Test unit provided by LG Germany.
In review: LG K10 (2017). Test unit provided by LG Germany.

The LG K10 (2017) certainly managed one thing: it is a clear progress compared to its predecessor. The casing became again slimmer and more high-quality, the battery lasts noticeably longer and that even with clearly more power under the hood. This power increase is so noticeable, that many competing devices are also outpaced by the LG K10 (2017). Only the HTC One A9s possesses even more power reserves, however, that device really comes from a different price range.

Of course there is something to complain: the speaker sounds squeaky, which makes the hands-free mode also hard to use. Likewise is the microphone of mediocre quality and the screen could be brighter. But actually, that was the extent of our complaints: The operating system is current, the power consumption okay, the camera takes quite good pictures, and the LG K10 (2017) handles well.

The high performance and the removable battery are the highlights of the LG K10 (2017). The quality of the plastic case also leaves a good impression. In terms of sound, the LG could do better, but overall, the LG K10 (2017) is a good budget smartphone.

Overall, a clear recommendation for the LG K10 (2017). Only anyone who absolutely needs more battery capacity will reach for the the Asus Zenfone 3 Max, but should consider that, in contrast to the LG K10 (2017), the battery cannot be removed there. The same goes for the HTC One A9s, where you again get more performance instead. But at any rate, the LG K10 (2017) is a very good deal for currently under 200 Euros (~$212).

LG K10 2017 - 04/12/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
83%
Tastiera
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositivo di puntamento
86%
Connettività
39 / 60 → 66%
Peso
93%
Batteria
91%
Display
82%
Prestazioni di gioco
16 / 63 → 25%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
36 / 70 → 52%
Temperatura
89%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
47 / 91 → 52%
Fotocamera
75%
Media
70%
81%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone LG K10 (2017)
Florian Wimmer, 2017-04-23 (Update: 2017-04-23)