Recensione breve del Portatile Acer Aspire VX5-591G (7700HQ, FHD, GTX 1050 Ti)

Sven Kloevekorn (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 04/25/2017

Divertimento limitato. Il nuovo portatile multimedia Acer progettato per il gaming convince per molti aspetti - solo l'hard drive convenzionale non rispecchia le tecnologie high-performance e rallenta il sistema nel test. Raccomandiamo di pensare ad un'altra versione con un SSD.

Dispositivo di test fornito da notebook.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Size Comparison

Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)

Left: Kensington, power, USB 2.0, SD card, audio in/out

Right: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, Ethernet

I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)	57.3 MB/s ∼100% +147%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15	23.2 MB/s ∼40%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE	22.7 MB/s ∼40% -2%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T	19.1 MB/s ∼33% -18%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)	202.8 MB/s ∼100% +635%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15	27.6 MB/s ∼14%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE	27.2 MB/s ∼13% -1%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T	27 MB/s ∼13% -2%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	674 MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	541 MBit/s ∼80% +2%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	533 MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	653 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	641 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	618 MBit/s ∼95% -5%


249 cd/m²	257 cd/m²	244 cd/m²
251 cd/m²	281 cd/m²	266 cd/m²
240 cd/m²	267 cd/m²	255 cd/m²

Distribuzione della luminosità

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Massima: 281 cd/m² Media: 256.7 cd/m² Minimum: 20.7 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 85 %
Al centro con la batteria: 281 cd/m²
Contrasto: 878:1 (Nero: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.16 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.57 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
58% sRGB (Argyll) 37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.59

ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times		-67%	-137%	-48%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	22 (10, 12)	41 (21, 20) -86%	54 (33.2, 20) -145%	40 (20, 20) -82%
Response Time Black / White *	23 (13, 10)	34 (21, 13) -48%	52.4 (33.2, 19.2) -128%	26 (6, 20) -13%
PWM Frequency
Screen		16%	27%	7%
Brightness middle	281	322 15%	400 42%	326 16%
Brightness	257	297 16%	392 53%	316 23%
Brightness Distribution	85	86 1%	89 5%	80 -6%
Black Level *	0.32	0.31 3%	0.26 19%	0.35 -9%
Contrast	878	1039 18%	1538 75%	931 6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.16	4.73 8%	4.9 5%	5.49 -6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	9.09	12.37 -36%	11 -21%	11.36 -25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.57	2.99 35%	7.2 -58%	4.84 -6%
Gamma	2.59 ^93%	2.32 ^103%	2.11 ^114%	2.23 ^108%
CCT	6931 ^94%	6905 ^94%	6911 ^94%	5971 ^109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37	56 51%	64.2 74%	53 43%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	58	85 47%	98.9 71%	80 38%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)		-26% / 2%	-55% / -1%	-21% / -2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

ℹ

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.

↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms Incremento
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms).
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms Incremento
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Intel Core i7-7700HQ	152 Points ∼26% +1%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	151 Points ∼26%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Intel Core i5-7300HQ	146 Points ∼25% -3%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points ∼22% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	719 Points ∼33%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Intel Core i7-7700HQ	673 (min: 660, max: 673) Points ∼31% -6%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Intel Core i5-7300HQ	508 Points ∼24% -29%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Intel Core i7-6500U	326 Points ∼15% -55%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

151 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

719 Points

Aiuto

... in confronto

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	4884 Points ∼75% +10%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	4442 Points ∼68%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4341 Points ∼67% -2%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	3659 Points ∼61% +3%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3565 Points ∼60%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	3370 Points ∼56% -5%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3565 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4442 punti

Aiuto

	Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		28%	1647%	8077%
Write 4k QD32	0.893	0.274 -69%	1.057 18%	234 26104%
Read 4k QD32	0.718	1.133 58%	69.75 9614%	149 20652%
Write 4k	0.846	0.313 -63%	1.021 21%	74.86 8749%
Read 4k	0.327	0.473 45%	10.84 3215%	22.43 6759%
Write 512	28.31	84.36 198%	42.51 50%	280.1 889%
Read 512	28.33	37.83 34%	101.7 259%	279.2 886%
Write Seq	100.6	101.8 1%	74.17 -26%	325.5 224%
Read Seq	101.5	120.9 19%	123 21%	459.3 353%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Toshiba MQ01ABD100

Valore Minimo di trasferimento: 25.7 MB/s

Valore Massimo di trasferimento: 110.2 MB/s

Valore Medio di trasferimento: 75.3 MB/s

Tempi di accesso: 27.8 ms

Burst Rate: 103.6 MB/s

Utilizzo CPU: 1.8 %

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	14942 Points ∼29% +53%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	9768 Points ∼19%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ	8201 Points ∼16% -16%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6500U	4826 Points ∼9% -51%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	11494 Points ∼28% +48%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7791 Points ∼19%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ	6393 Points ∼16% -18%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6500U	4133 Points ∼10% -47%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	66973 Points ∼36% +44%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	46362 Points ∼25%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ	39864 Points ∼22% -14%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6500U	25986 Points ∼14% -44%

3DMark 11 Performance		8674 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		20791 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score		6774 punti

Aiuto

... in confronto

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	38.3 fps ∼100% +52%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	25.2 (min: 19) fps ∼66%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	24.9 fps ∼65% -1%

	basso	medio	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)			45.8	25.2	fps
The Division (2016)			42.6	34.9	fps
For Honor (2017)		44.8	40.9	21.2	fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)			40.9	21.2	fps

Rumorosità

Idle		31.4 / 31.4 / 31.4 dB(A)
HDD		31.8 dB(A)
Sotto carico		36.8 / 41.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza) Rumorosità ambientale: 30.4 dB(A)

Carico massimo

Idle


37.6 °C	47 °C	41 °C
36.2 °C	46.3 °C	37.2 °C
22.4 °C	26.6 °C	29.3 °C

Massima: 47 °C
Media: 36 °C


47 °C	41 °C	44 °C
29.2 °C	37 °C	31 °C
27.7 °C	25.5 °C	23.2 °C

Massima: 47 °C
Media: 34 °C

Alimentazione (max) 45 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.97 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente

Off / Standby	0.31 / 0.4 Watt
Idle	7 / 10.2 / 14 Watt
Sotto carico	78 / 127 Watt


Leggenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 1920x1080, 15.6	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) 7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption		-9%	8%	23%
Idle Minimum *	7	7.2 -3%	6.6 6%	5 29%
Idle Average *	10.2	10.5 -3%	9 12%	8.9 13%
Idle Maximum *	14	16 -14%	10.7 24%	11.8 16%
Load Average *	78	82 -5%	77.5 1%	55 29%
Load Maximum *	127	155 -22%	130 -2%	93 27%
Witcher 3 ultra *		124

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria

Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)		5ore 22minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		5ore 02minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)		1ore 21minuti

	Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 52.5 Wh	Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 69 Wh	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) 7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 56 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, 48 Wh
Autonomia della batteria		51%	30%	71%
Reader / Idle	322	501 56%	565 75%	816 153%
WiFi v1.3	302	357 18%	334 11%	430 42%
Load	81	144 78%	84 4%	95 17%
H.264				428

Pro

+ molte versioni

+ case solido

+ velocità Wi-Fi molto buone

+ schermo complessivamente decente

+ veloce CPU 8-thread

+ silenzioso in idle e sotto carico

Contro

- relativamente pesante e grande

- card reader scomodo

- manca una cover di manutenzione

- la batteria non è removibile dall'esterno

- gamma di colore limitata

- manca un SSD

In review: Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4. Test model courtesy of Notebook.de

Non spettacolare ma solido come una roccia - Acer ha fatto nun buon lavoro con il suo nuovo VX5-591G-75C4.

Ad eccezione del veloce processore, la maggioranza dei componenti si trova nella fascia medio alta e quindi corrisponde al prezzo di 1000 Euro (~$1061) per questa versione e 1200 Euro (~$1273) per la versione con un SSD. Questo ci porta al punto: Possiamo dare una raccomandazione con riserva a questo portatile multimedia senza un solid state drive. Gli utenti che vogliono maggiore potenza gaming e necessitano di una GTX 1060 dovranno inevitabilmente scendere a compromessi per la rumorosità, e in quando uno dei punti di formza è proprio la silenziosità di questo nuovo multimedia Acer.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 - 2017-04-1104/11/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis

80 / 98 → 82%

Tastiera

79%

Dispositivo di puntamento

87%

Connettività

52 / 81 → 64%

Peso

60 / 20-67 → 85%