Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Nomu S30

Benjamin Gärtner (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 04/23/2017

Robusto compagno multimediale. Con l'S30, Nomu offre uno smartphone dotato di una potente tecnologia che, grazie al suo basso prezzo rispetto all'hardware offerto, si pone come un concorrente di smartphone multimediali e outdoor da non sottovalutare.

Nomu S30
Processore
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 2 GHz
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 401 PPI, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: jack da 3,5 mm, Lettore schede: microSD fino a 32 GB, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Sensore accelerazione,s ensore prossimità, giroscopio, bussola, OTG
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (​900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​​B7/​B8/​B20); Bandwidth (download/​upload): 300 Mbps/​50 Mbps (LTE), 21 Mbps/​5.76 Mbps (UMTS), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 13,5 x 162 x 83
Batteria
5000 mAh polimeri di litio, Tempo conversazione 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 30 ore, Standby 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 1680 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix LED flash, f/2.0
Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Casse inferiori, Tastiera: virtuale, caricatore, cavo USB, Smart assistant, SOS settings, modalità guanti, 12 Mesi Garanzia, radio FM, senza ventola, gommato
Peso
260 gr, Alimentazione: 75 gr
Prezzo
260 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼100% +178%
Nomu S30
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼36%
Archos 50 Saphir
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.9 MBit/s ∼16% -55%
UMI Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755
31.2 MBit/s ∼11% -69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼100% +228%
Nomu S30
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼30%
Archos 50 Saphir
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.3 MBit/s ∼15% -50%
UMI Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755
34.4 MBit/s ∼10% -66%
GPS Nomu S30: overview
GPS Nomu S30: overview
GPS Nomu S30: crossroads
GPS Nomu S30: crossroads
GPS Nomu S30: riverbank
GPS Nomu S30: riverbank
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500: crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500: riverbank
GPS Garmin Edge 500: riverbank

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
433
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 435 cd/m² Media: 421.1 cd/m² Minimum: 11.18 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 93 %
Al centro con la batteria: 423 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1627:1 (Nero: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 9.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.32
Nomu S30
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1
Archos 50 Saphir
IPS, 1280x720, 5
UMI Plus
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
IPS, 800x480, 4.5
Screen
36%
-44%
17%
-12%
Brightness
421
351
-17%
527
25%
430
2%
436
4%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
87
-6%
86
-8%
91
-2%
Black Level *
0.26
0.58
-123%
0.232
11%
0.53
-104%
Contrast
1627
940
-42%
1866
15%
853
-48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.8
2.04
74%
12.5
-60%
4.93
37%
5.71
27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.8
1.63
83%
15.4
-57%
5.18
47%
5.02
49%
Gamma
2.32 103%
2.07 116%
1.87 128%
2.4 100%
2.15 112%
CCT
9828 66%
6391 102%
12705 51%
7461 87%
7441 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
86.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.35

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5069 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms Incremento
↘ 9.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms Incremento
↘ 17.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.4 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
50904 Points ∼22%
Archos 50 Saphir
38747 Points ∼17% -24%
UMI Plus
48558 Points ∼21% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points ∼56% +151%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
2859 Points ∼10%
Archos 50 Saphir
1761 Points ∼6% -38%
UMI Plus
2695 Points ∼10% -6%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
759 Points ∼14%
Archos 50 Saphir
634 Points ∼11% -16%
UMI Plus
693 Points ∼12% -9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
1182 Points ∼39%
Archos 50 Saphir
985 Points ∼33% -17%
UMI Plus
1272 Points ∼42% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2022 Points ∼67% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
351 Points ∼7%
Archos 50 Saphir
142 Points ∼3% -60%
UMI Plus
352 Points ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2216 Points ∼41% +531%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
416 Points ∼11%
Archos 50 Saphir
175 Points ∼5% -58%
UMI Plus
419 Points ∼11% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2170 Points ∼56% +422%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
1114 Points ∼38%
Archos 50 Saphir
973 Points ∼33% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points ∼69% +80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
522 Points ∼7%
Archos 50 Saphir
220 Points ∼3% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points ∼39% +478%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
592 Points ∼12%
Archos 50 Saphir
266 Points ∼5% -55%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points ∼55% +359%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
12394 Points ∼18%
Archos 50 Saphir
11393 Points ∼16% -8%
UMI Plus
12078 Points ∼17% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points ∼29% +61%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
9613 Points ∼14% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
10373 Points ∼2%
Archos 50 Saphir
6138 Points ∼1% -41%
UMI Plus
10532 Points ∼2% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points ∼7% +221%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
2591 Points ∼1% -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
10763 Points ∼5%
Archos 50 Saphir
6839 Points ∼3% -36%
UMI Plus
10840 Points ∼6% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points ∼15% +170%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
3093 Points ∼2% -71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
17 fps ∼1%
Archos 50 Saphir
11 fps ∼1% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps ∼6% +394%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
5.4 fps ∼0% -68%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
17 fps ∼4%
Archos 50 Saphir
19 fps ∼4% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps ∼12% +212%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
15.1 fps ∼3% -11%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
7.1 fps ∼1%
Archos 50 Saphir
4 fps ∼1% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps ∼7% +463%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
0.8 fps ∼0% -89%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
7.1 fps ∼2%
Archos 50 Saphir
8.6 fps ∼2% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps ∼7% +280%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
2.3 fps ∼1% -68%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
2.5 fps ∼1%
Archos 50 Saphir
2.6 fps ∼1% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps ∼7% +1020%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
4.7 fps ∼3%
Archos 50 Saphir
6.1 fps ∼3% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps ∼9% +219%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
3175 Points ∼38%
UMI Plus
3069 Points ∼37% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points ∼58% +52%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
618 Points ∼40%
Archos 50 Saphir
619 Points ∼40% 0%
UMI Plus
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points ∼62% +55%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
744 Points ∼48% +20%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
670 Points ∼8%
Archos 50 Saphir
383 Points ∼4% -43%
UMI Plus
666 Points ∼8% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points ∼20% +157%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
129 Points ∼1% -81%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
942 Points ∼22%
Archos 50 Saphir
402 Points ∼9% -57%
UMI Plus
992 Points ∼23% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points ∼52% +138%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
366 Points ∼9% -61%
System (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
2216 Points ∼34%
Archos 50 Saphir
1284 Points ∼20% -42%
UMI Plus
2120 Points ∼32% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points ∼64% +90%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
1103 Points ∼17% -50%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
964 Points ∼26%
Archos 50 Saphir
591 Points ∼16% -39%
UMI Plus
341 Points ∼9% -65%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points ∼54% +106%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
443 Points ∼12% -54%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
3279 Points ∼7%
Archos 50 Saphir
3483 Points ∼7% +6%
UMI Plus
3887 Points ∼8% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points ∼27% +301%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
2059 Points ∼4% -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
23913.5 ms * ∼40%
Archos 50 Saphir
10544 ms * ∼18% +56%
UMI Plus
10342.7 ms * ∼17% +57%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2561.5 ms * ∼4% +89%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
21.52 MB/s ∼25%
Archos 50 Saphir
18.3 MB/s ∼21% -15%
UMI Plus
21.55 MB/s ∼25% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53.6 MB/s ∼62% +149%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
36.94 MB/s ∼38%
Archos 50 Saphir
28.55 MB/s ∼30% -23%
UMI Plus
35.95 MB/s ∼37% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
72.33 MB/s ∼75% +96%
Random Write 4KB (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
8.84 MB/s ∼6%
Archos 50 Saphir
4.79 MB/s ∼3% -46%
UMI Plus
11.54 MB/s ∼8% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S7
16.01 MB/s ∼11% +81%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
4 MB/s ∼3% -55%
Random Read 4KB (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
27.99 MB/s ∼16%
Archos 50 Saphir
14.48 MB/s ∼8% -48%
UMI Plus
25.75 MB/s ∼15% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
85.9 MB/s ∼50% +207%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
15.8 MB/s ∼9% -44%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
194.95 MB/s ∼94%
Archos 50 Saphir
12.21 MB/s ∼6% -94%
UMI Plus
128.53 MB/s ∼62% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7
145.72 MB/s ∼71% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
25.6 MB/s ∼12% -87%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
241.97 MB/s ∼31%
Archos 50 Saphir
140.87 MB/s ∼18% -42%
UMI Plus
244.1 MB/s ∼31% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
483.82 MB/s ∼61% +100%
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
113.5 MB/s ∼14% -53%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordina per valore)
Nomu S30
24.234 Points ∼7%
Archos 50 Saphir
22 Points ∼7% -9%
UMI Plus
26.054 Points ∼8% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points ∼22% +205%

Legenda

 
Nomu S30 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Saphir Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Plus Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2,
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 Marvell Armada PXA1908, Vivante GC7000UL, 8 GB eMMC Flash

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 41.1 °C39 °C35.4 °C 
 40.1 °C39.2 °C35.4 °C 
 42.3 °C40 °C34.9 °C 
Massima: 42.3 °C
Media: 38.6 °C
33.2 °C35.1 °C38.3 °C
32.8 °C34.2 °C39.5 °C
32.7 °C34.4 °C39.3 °C
Massima: 39.5 °C
Media: 35.5 °C
Alimentazione (max)  32.8 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.62525.438.33125.335.94032.928.15033.628.86331.631.98028.432.31002730.612520.832.81602231.820021.33625020.838.631521.246.240019.456.450019.564.463017.772.480017.976.9100017.880125017.378.7160017.479.8200016.779.6250017.281.5315018.283.4400017.981.2500017.670.5630017.763.9800017.859.11000017.961.81250018.160.11600018.250SPL3090.8N1.375.9median 17.9Nomu S30median 63.9Delta1.316.731.63925.436.425.332.232.932.433.630.331.632.728.437.42739.220.845.32252.121.359.820.861.821.267.119.47219.575.617.776.817.975.217.879.617.381.417.481.716.78117.278.118.273.117.970.917.675.217.775.917.874.717.971.918.171.618.258.63089.81.382.3median 17.9Archos 50 Saphirmedian 73.11.37.237.634.334.834.833.731.233.931.933.33231.333.232.234.429.729.730.629.727.431.526.829.92629.624.833.223.940.523.446.722.752.822.459.422.664.22267.921.766.521.567.121.272.921.173.920.977.320.978.82172.62162.621.258215221.243.33484.42.249.2median 22UMI Plusmedian 581.813.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Nomu S30 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Archos 50 Saphir audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

UMI Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (41.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.46 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.93 / 2.31 / 2.35 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 4.57 / 6.1 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nomu S30
5000 mAh
Archos 50 Saphir
5000 mAh
UMI Plus
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
 mAh
Power Consumption
4%
-61%
42%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
0.65
30%
2.6
-180%
0.6
35%
Idle Average *
2.31
1.9
18%
3.2
-39%
1.2
48%
Idle Maximum *
2.35
2.05
13%
3.3
-40%
1.3
45%
Load Average *
4.57
6.14
-34%
7.7
-68%
2.6
43%
Load Maximum *
6.1
6.54
-7%
4.8
21%
3.6
41%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
13ore 52minuti
Nomu S30
5000 mAh
Archos 50 Saphir
5000 mAh
UMI Plus
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3
 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
17%
-33%
-40%
Reader / Idle
1319
1002
WiFi v1.3
832
973
17%
561
-33%
503
-40%
Load
292
166
H.264
678

Pro

+ hardware potente
+ buone features
+ case robusto
+ display luminoso
+ Dual-SIM
+ LTE
+ microSD

Contro

- Pesp
- GPS non molto preciso
- tasti dedicati
- fotocamere medie
In review: Nomu S30 smartphone. Review unit provided by Nomu
In review: Nomu S30 smartphone. Review unit provided by Nomu

Lo smartphone outdoor di Nomu è rivolto agli utenti che cercano un dispositivo che, al di là dell'utilizzo quotidiano, consenta viaggi senza doversi preoccupare di danneggiare gli elementi esterni. Ciò è garantito da features come un rating IP68, Gorilla Glass 4 e porte chiuse. Inoltre, Nomu dota l'S30 con una grande varietà di features tecniche come il supporto LTE, unito ad un potente SoC che esclude tutti gli altri dispositivi esterni a questo riguardo. Nonostante le potenti perfomance di questa classe, la batteria a lunga durata limita raramente l'utente.

Supera la concorrenza, ma non adatto a tutti!

In conflitto con le altrimenti riuscite features e le implementazioni mancanti, gli angoli del display limitati, che limitano la protezione della parte anteriore. L'uso multimediale sembra similmente contraddittorio, perché il dispositivo non è solo pesante, ma è anche ingombrante, ciò limita tra le altre cose, le sessioni di gioco agli utenti adulti.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Nomu S30 - 04/04/2017 v6
Benjamin Gärtner

Chassis
78%
Tastiera
70 / 75 → 93%
Dispositivo di puntamento
81%
Connettività
43 / 60 → 72%
Peso
87%
Batteria
97%
Display
81%
Prestazioni di gioco
20 / 63 → 31%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
37 / 70 → 53%
Temperatura
88%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Fotocamera
56%
Media
68%
77%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Nomu S30
Benjamin Gärtner, 2017-04-23 (Update: 2017-04-23)