Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Convertibile Dell Latitude 3189 (N4200, HD)

Fatto per essere robustot! Dell ha combinato un portatile da 11.6" con una CPU energeticamente efficiente. Stando al produttore, questa combinazione dovrebbe consentire al dispositivo di resistere anche ad un'intera giornata a scuola. Abbiamo deciso di dare uno sguardo da vicino a queste dichiarazioni. Vediamo se il Latitude 3189 mantiene le promesse nella nostra recensione.

Dell Latitude 3189
Processore
Scheda grafica
Intel HD Graphics 505, 21.20.16.4574
Memoria
4096 MB 
, LPDDR3-1866, dual-channel
Schermo
11.6 pollici 16:9, 1366x768 pixel 135 PPI, LCD touchscreen, supporto penna nativo, AU Optronics AUO235C B116XAT, IPS, Touchscreen con Corning Gorilla glass NBT, lucido: si
Scheda madre
Apollo Lake
Harddisk
Liteonit CV3-8D128, 128 GB 
, M.2 SSD, 95 GB libera
Scheda audio
Realtek ALC235 @ Intel Apollo Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, Connessioni Audio: stereo, Lettore schede: MicroSD
Rete
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 20.75 x 303.8 x 207.9
Batteria
42 Wh, 3500 mAh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720pFotocamera Secondaria: FHD 1080p
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: no, Alimentatore, Dell System Detect, 12 Mesi Garanzia, Slot per Noble Security lock
Peso
1.427 kg, Alimentazione: 342 gr
Prezzo
799 Euro

 

Left side: power supply, MicroSD slot, HDMI connector, 2 USB 3.0 (1 with PowerShare)
Left side: power supply, MicroSD slot, HDMI connector, 2 USB 3.0 (1 with PowerShare)
right side: combined stereo jack, power, volume up/down, slot for Noble security lock (Wedge Profile)
right side: combined stereo jack, power, volume up/down, slot for Noble security lock (Wedge Profile)
back: no ports
back: no ports
front: no ports
front: no ports
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
68.1 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Dell Latitude 3189
61.7 MB/s ∼91%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
45.6 MB/s ∼67% -26%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
14.7 MB/s ∼22% -76%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
87.5 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Dell Latitude 3189
83.5 MB/s ∼95%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
80.51 MB/s ∼92% -4%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
27 MB/s ∼31% -68%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
657 MBit/s ∼100%
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
509 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
663 MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
548 MBit/s ∼83%
277
cd/m²
273
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 298 cd/m² Media: 284.3 cd/m² Minimum: 14.6 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 92 %
Al centro con la batteria: 291 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1819:1 (Nero: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | - Ø
67% sRGB (Argyll) 42.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.14
Dell Latitude 3189
IPS, 1366x768, 11.6
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
IPS, 1366x768, 11.6
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Response Times
7%
39%
12%
40%
19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (18.8, 21.2)
40 (22, 18)
-0%
18.8 (6.8, 12)
53%
38 (14, 24)
5%
23 (13, 10)
42%
20 (5, 15, detail 5 schraffiert)
50%
Response Time Black / White *
30.4 (16.4, 14)
26 (14, 12)
14%
23.2 (10, 13.2)
24%
25 (6, 19)
18%
19 (11, 8)
37%
34 (15, 19, [email protected]% mit/ohne PSU)
-12%
PWM Frequency
50 (70)
1000 (100)
Screen
-39%
-13%
-50%
-84%
-59%
Brightness
284
392
38%
186
-35%
263
-7%
284
0%
328
15%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
86
-7%
88
-4%
82
-11%
91
-1%
Black Level *
0.16
0.33
-106%
0.22
-38%
0.31
-94%
0.33
-106%
0.38
-138%
Contrast
1819
1188
-35%
882
-52%
894
-51%
909
-50%
908
-50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.4
4.99
-47%
3.06
10%
5.57
-64%
7.87
-131%
8.4
-147%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.8
4.53
-152%
1.42
21%
4.56
-153%
8.45
-369%
4.3
-139%
Gamma
2.14 112%
2.46 98%
2.34 103%
2.28 105%
2.42 99%
2.63 91%
CCT
6544 99%
7394 88%
6432 101%
6648 98%
6856 95%
7368 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
42.8
41
-4%
42.98
0%
38
-11%
41
-4%
62
45%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
67
64
-4%
67.56
1%
59
-12%
64
-4%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-16% / -30%
13% / -2%
-19% / -37%
-22% / -60%
-20% / -42%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Color accuracy before calibration
Color accuracy before calibration
Color saturation before calibration
Color saturation before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Color accuracy after calibration
Color accuracy after calibration
Color saturation after calibration
Color saturation after calibration

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms Incremento
↘ 14 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms Incremento
↘ 21.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5069 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC-Latenzen
 
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points ∼100% +152%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points ∼90% +128%
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
103 Points ∼82% +106%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Intel Core m3-6Y30
71 Points ∼56% +42%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
50 Points ∼40%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Intel Celeron N3050
35 Points ∼28% -30%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼100% +89%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points ∼88% +66%
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
213 Points ∼65% +22%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
174 Points ∼53%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Intel Core m3-6Y30
97 Points ∼30% -44%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Intel Celeron N3050
65 Points ∼20% -63%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.38 Points ∼100% +112%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
0.65 Points ∼47%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points ∼100% +62%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
2.27 Points ∼62%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
211.38 Points ∼100% +150%
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
180.04 Points ∼85% +113%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
133.3 Points ∼63% +58%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Intel Core m3-6Y30
98 Points ∼46% +16%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
84.572 Points ∼40%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Intel Celeron N3050
43.305 Points ∼20% -49%
Octane V2 - Total Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
30892 Points ∼100% +132%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
23339 Points ∼76% +76%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Intel Core m3-6Y30
16804 Points ∼54% +26%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
13290 Points ∼43%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
3112.6 ms * ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Intel Core m3-6Y30
1649.3 ms * ∼53% +47%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
1445.2 ms * ∼46% +54%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
1186.2 ms * ∼38% +62%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
3155
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
5346
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1633
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
3348 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
7833 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
2375 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.27 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
13.53 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.65 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
50 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
18.92 fps
Aiuto
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 7
PCMark 7
PCMark Vantage
PCMark Vantage
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
4050 Points ∼100% +35%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3996 Points ∼99% +34%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3729 Points ∼92% +25%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200, 1100, Liteonit CV3-8D128
2993 Points ∼74%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
3806 Points ∼100% +47%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3202 Points ∼84% +24%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200, 1100, Liteonit CV3-8D128
2585 Points ∼68%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3281 Points ∼100% +44%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
3274 Points ∼100% +44%
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100,
3076 Points ∼94% +35%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
2625 Points ∼80% +15%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200, 1100, Liteonit CV3-8D128
2273 Points ∼69%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Intel Celeron N3050, 1600, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680
1545 Points ∼47% -32%
PCMark 7
Productivity
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200, 1100, Liteonit CV3-8D128
2095 Points ∼100%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
1089 Points ∼52% -48%
Score
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200, 1100, Liteonit CV3-8D128
4259 Points ∼100%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
3227 Points ∼76% -24%
PCMark Vantage Result
9360 punti
PCMark 7 Score
4259 punti
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2273 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
2585 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2993 punti
Aiuto
AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark
CrystalDiskMark
CrystalDiskInfo
CrystalDiskInfo
ATTO
ATTO
Dell Latitude 3189
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
37%
-85%
-87%
97%
70%
Write 4k QD32
111.7
68.79
-38%
1.003
-99%
1.09
-99%
268.6
140%
197.1
76%
Read 4k QD32
132.2
249.2
89%
0.898
-99%
0.968
-99%
324.2
145%
272
106%
Write 4k
49.14
41.68
-15%
1.026
-98%
1.037
-98%
73.61
50%
76.83
56%
Read 4k
8.864
28.11
217%
0.407
-95%
0.215
-98%
31.27
253%
29.3
231%
Write 512
170.6
121.8
-29%
39.03
-77%
45.05
-74%
301.9
77%
201
18%
Read 512
243.7
324.1
33%
33.53
-86%
20.67
-92%
385.7
58%
374.9
54%
Write Seq
214.3
286.5
34%
106.1
-50%
91
-58%
302.8
41%
199.9
-7%
Read Seq
408.4
427.6
5%
106
-74%
104.8
-74%
456.2
12%
518.1
27%
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Sequential Read: 408.4 MB/s
Sequential Write: 214.3 MB/s
512K Read: 243.7 MB/s
512K Write: 170.6 MB/s
4K Read: 8.864 MB/s
4K Write: 49.14 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 132.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 111.7 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
762 Points ∼100% +26%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
606 Points ∼80%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
519 Points ∼68% -14%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7307 Points ∼100% +54%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6799 Points ∼93% +43%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
4738 Points ∼65%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
4357 Points ∼60% -8%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1428 Points ∼100% +78%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1390 Points ∼97% +73%
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1088 Points ∼76% +35%
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
863 Points ∼60% +7%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
804 Points ∼56%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
377 Points ∼26% -53%
3DMark 11 Performance
883 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
33896 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3558 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
565 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
260 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score
118 punti
Aiuto
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 30.617.315.1fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 20.915.29.5fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 6.14fps
Dell Latitude 3189
N4200, HD Graphics 505
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell)
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
7200U, HD Graphics 620
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
6Y30, HD Graphics 515
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520
Emissions
Fan Noise
37.3
Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: FurMark only
Stress test: FurMark only
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
Carico massimo
 43.3 °C41.5 °C37.8 °C 
 40.6 °C39.6 °C32.1 °C 
 37.9 °C34.9 °C29.2 °C 
Massima: 43.3 °C
Media: 37.4 °C
37.7 °C49.6 °C54.9 °C
29.6 °C49.3 °C49 °C
25.7 °C27.7 °C28.8 °C
Massima: 54.9 °C
Media: 39.1 °C
Alimentazione (max)  29.8 °C | Temperatura della stanza 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Dell Latitude 3189
N4200, HD Graphics 505
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell)
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
7200U, HD Graphics 620
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
6Y30, HD Graphics 515
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520
Heat
12%
-17%
15%
-1%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
43.3
38.1
12%
44.6
-3%
34.6
20%
36.8
15%
46.7
-8%
Maximum Bottom *
54.9
41.7
24%
53.1
3%
36.4
34%
42
23%
51
7%
Idle Upper Side *
27.5
27.9
-1%
35.2
-28%
26.6
3%
32.1
-17%
29.5
-7%
Idle Bottom *
27.9
24.1
14%
38.6
-38%
27.7
1%
34.4
-23%
28.6
-3%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.133.92532.133313434.34028.630.55028.831.76325.133.48025.936.410025.63512525.137.916021.438.220021.241.225020.251.231521.559.140019.259.150017.554.763016.557.880016.468.6100015.873.4125015.566.116001568.1200015.367.4250015.167.5315015.471.2400015.476.4500015.775.4630015.771.5800016.167.61000016.162.21250015.967.11600015.870.2SPL28.383N1.152.7median 16.1Dell Latitude 3189median 67.1Delta2.37.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Dell Latitude 3189 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.17 / 4.31 / 5.79 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 15.8 / 24.2 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Latitude 3189
N4200, HD Graphics 505, Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, , IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
7200U, HD Graphics 620, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Power Consumption
-37%
-45%
-66%
-29%
-105%
Idle Minimum *
2.17
3.8
-75%
5.3
-144%
4.7
-117%
4.3
-98%
7.3
-236%
Idle Average *
4.31
7.1
-65%
7.1
-65%
7.2
-67%
7.1
-65%
10
-132%
Idle Maximum *
5.79
8.1
-40%
8.2
-42%
7.9
-36%
7.2
-24%
10.15
-75%
Load Average *
15.8
19.1
-21%
15.5
2%
30
-90%
14.6
8%
25.2
-59%
Load Maximum *
24.2
20.2
17%
18.9
22%
29
-20%
15.7
35%
29.3
-21%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Maximum battery runtime
Maximum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Battery runtime on Wi-Fi
Battery runtime on Wi-Fi
H.264 battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
Time to recharge
Time to recharge
Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
21ore 59minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3 (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
10ore 07minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8ore 21minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
4ore 13minuti
Dell Latitude 3189
N4200, HD Graphics 505, 42 Wh
Medion Akoya P3401T 2in1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 51 Wh
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 32 Wh
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 40 Wh
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
-28%
-53%
-52%
-21%
-40%
Reader / Idle
1319
560
-58%
864
-34%
640
-51%
H.264
501
320
-36%
462
-8%
468
-7%
WiFi v1.3
607
440
-28%
286
-53%
322
-47%
417
-31%
321
-47%
Load
253
86
-66%
226
-11%
112
-56%

Dell ha realizzato il Latitude 3189 prevalentemente per il settore educativo. La base di questa scelta ha comportato la creazione di un design robusto. Ulteriori features come un touchscreen sono positive ed aggiungono valore al dispositivo. Questo rende il dispositivo anche molto versatile. L'Intel Pentium N4200, che si avvale di 4 GB di DDR3 RAM, è il massimo che il produttore ha da offrire in termini di prestazioni. Non raccomandiamo la configurazione alternativa con CPU Intel Celeron N3350. Il nostro modello di test, che non è il più economico con 799 Euro (~$857), è silenzioso, ma con un Intel Celeron N3350 (dual core processor), le performance sarebbero nettamente peggiori.

Il Dell Latitude 3189 è un dispositivo robusto, che aiuta gli studenti ad apprendere con i nuovi media. La base stabile si maneggia facilmente e la sua ottima autonomia, riesce a durare anche una giornata intera a scuola.

Abbiamo poche cose da criticare per il Dell Latitude 3189: ad esempio l'assenza di una porta USB Type-C, che serviva anche per il futuro, e il display molto riflettente, che potrebbe irritare e rendere difficile il lavoro in ambienti aperti. Il dispositivo di archiviazione ha vantaggi e svantaggi. Una volta che si installano sistema operativo ed alcuni programmi, non resta molto dei 128 GB. Nel complesso, possiamo dire che nonostante non sia eccezionale in alcune aree rispetto ad altri dispositivi, il Dell Latitude 3189 fa un buon lavoro. Le prestazioni di sistema soggettivamente sono nettamente migliori rispetto a quello che avevano mostrato i benchmarks.

 

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Pro

+ molto robusto
+ costruzione impeccabile
+ versatile
+ schermo con angoli di visuale stabili
+ touchscreen
+ SSD
+ energeticamente efficiente
+ eccellente autonomia
+ nessuna ventola
+ CPU sufficiente per il tipo di utilizzo

Contro

- display con luminosità bassa
- display molto riflettente
- manca una USB Type-C
- 128 GB di memoria
- si scalda sotto carico
- poche opzioni di configurazione
- prezzo relativamente alto
The Dell Latitude 3189: test unit provided by Dell Germany.
The Dell Latitude 3189: test unit provided by Dell Germany.

Dell has aimed the Latitude 3189 mainly at the education sector. The basis for this has been established with its robust design. Additional features such as a touchscreen are good and add additional value to the device. This also makes the device a lot more versatile. The Intel Pentium N4200, which can rely on 4 GB of DDR3 RAM, is the maximum of what the manufacturer has to offer concerning performance. We would not recommend the alternative CPU configuration with the Intel Celeron N3350. Our test unit, which is not the cheapest at 799 Euros (~$857), runs quite well, but with an Intel Celeron N3350 (dual core processor), the performance would be significantly worse.

The Dell Latitude 3189 is a very robust device, which helps children learn how to handle the new media. The stable base unit can handle quite a lot and thanks to its great battery runtime, one battery charge easily lasts an entire day at school.

We have got a few things to criticize about the Dell Latitude 3189: for example the missing USB Type-C port, which would secure the device's future, and  the very reflective display, which can be irritating and make it difficult to work in light spaces. The storage device has advantages and disadvantages. Once the operating system and some programs are installed, not much is left of the 128 GB storage capacity. Overall, we can say that despite it not doing so well in some areas compared with the other test units, the Dell Latitude 3189 does a solid job. The subjective system performance was definitely better than the results the benchmarks showed.

Dell Latitude 3189 - 04/25/2017 v6
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Tastiera
82%
Dispositivo di puntamento
83%
Connettività
43 / 80 → 53%
Peso
70 / 78 → 81%
Batteria
91%
Display
83%
Prestazioni di gioco
52 / 68 → 77%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
63 / 87 → 72%
Temperatura
87%
Rumorosità
95%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Fotocamera
47 / 85 → 56%
Media
72%
82%
Convertible - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Convertibile Dell Latitude 3189 (N4200, HD)
Sebastian Bade, 2017-04-27 (Update: 2017-04-27)