Recensione breve del Portatile Lenovo ThinkPad 13 (Core i3-7100U, Full HD)
Aggiornamento Entry-level. La piattaforma Intel Kaby Lake appare su sempre più portatili, ed ora Lenovo ha aggiornato il ThinkPad 13 con la settima generazione di processori. La nuova piattaforma riesca ad incrementare le prestazioni in modo tale da giustificare l'upgrade?
| SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribuzione della luminosità: 88 %
Al centro con la batteria: 266.4 cd/m²
Contrasto: 859:1 (Nero: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
60% sRGB (Argyll) 38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.36
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Lenovo LEN4094, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 LP133WF2-SPL1, , 13.3, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE Lenovo N156B6-L07, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768 | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Innolux N140BGE, TN LED, 14, 1366x768 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -5% | -10% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.8 (18, 14.8) | 43.2 (19.6, 23.6) -32% | 50 (20, 30) -52% | 47 (25, 22) -43% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34.4 (21.2, 13.2) | 26.8 (9.6, 17.2) 22% | 23 (7, 16) 33% | 26 (18, 8) 24% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | 3% | -56% | -50% | |
| Brightness middle | 266.4 | 233 -13% | 241 -10% | 206 -23% |
| Brightness | 250 | 227 -9% | 226 -10% | 193 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 89 1% | 87 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.22 29% | 0.48 -55% | 0.48 -55% |
| Contrast | 859 | 1059 23% | 502 -42% | 429 -50% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 5.3 | 5.41 -2% | 12.43 -135% | 11 -108% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 21 | 13.61 35% | 21.03 -0% | 19.57 7% |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 3.3 | 4.15 -26% | 13.24 -301% | 11.51 -249% |
| Gamma | 2.36 102% | 2.45 98% | 2.61 92% | 2.23 108% |
| CCT | 6843 95% | 6773 96% | 15733 41% | 13671 48% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 36.52 -4% | 36 -5% | 38.46 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60 | 57.16 -5% | 57 -5% | 60.61 1% |
| Media totale (Programma / Settaggio) | -1% /
1% | -33% /
-48% | -30% /
-43% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Tempi di risposta del Display
| ↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms Incremento |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms Calo | ||
| Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio | ||
| 32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms Incremento |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms Calo | ||
| Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| wPrime 2.0x - 1024m | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - --- | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
| PCMark 8 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 3294 punti | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3163 punti | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3886 punti | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4139 punti |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX) | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | HP ProBook 440 G4 Z2Y47ES Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 16% | -87% | -90% | 25% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 162.2 | 276.2 70% | 1.285 -99% | 0.901 -99% | 216.2 33% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 235.3 | 360.9 53% | 0.976 -100% | 0.721 -100% | 379.4 61% |
| Write 4k | 76.12 | 68.46 -10% | 1.29 -98% | 0.946 -99% | 80.18 5% |
| Read 4k | 34.46 | 31.85 -8% | 0.373 -99% | 0.362 -99% | 33.08 -4% |
| Write 512 | 247.2 | 298.4 21% | 66.77 -73% | 292.5 18% | |
| Read 512 | 315.7 | 351.6 11% | 34.31 -89% | 404 28% | |
| Write Seq | 331.3 | 297.8 -10% | 123.1 -63% | 103.2 -69% | 466.9 41% |
| Read Seq | 447.3 | 461.7 3% | 120.4 -73% | 108.9 -76% | 523.9 17% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 34539 punti | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4409 punti |
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (ordina per valore) | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| 1366x768 High Preset (ordina per valore) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset (ordina per valore) | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset (ordina per valore) | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
| Ashes of the Singularity - 1280x768 low (ordina per valore) | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| basso | medio | alto | ultra | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 35 | 22 | 11 | fps | |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 8.9 | fps |
Rumorosità
| Idle |
| 28.7 / 28.7 / 28.7 dB(A) | |||
| Sotto carico |
| 31.2 / 35.9 dB(A) | |||
 | |||||
30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso |
|||||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm di distanza) Rumorosità ambientale: 28.7 dB(A) | |||||
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS HD Graphics 620, 7100U | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX) | Dell Latitude 14 3470 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | HP ProBook 440 G4 Z2Y47ES HD Graphics 620, 7100U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | -12% | -7% | -10% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 28.7 | 29.1 -1% | 31.2 -9% | 29.2 -2% | 30.9 -8% | 30.5 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.7 | 29.1 -1% | 32.3 -13% | 32.3 -13% | 30 -5% | 30.5 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 28.7 | 29.1 -1% | 32.3 -13% | 32.3 -13% | 31.8 -11% | 30.5 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.7 | 29.1 -1% | 32.5 -13% | 32.3 -13% | 33.5 -17% | 30.6 -7% |
| Load Average * | 31.2 | 31.5 -1% | 36 -15% | 33.3 -7% | 35.7 -14% | 31 1% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.9 | 33.5 7% | 38.8 -8% | 33.4 7% | 38.5 -7% | 36.8 -3% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
| Off / Standby | 0.44 / 0.51 Watt |
| Idle | 3.5 / 5.7 / 6.2 Watt |
| Sotto carico |
24.1 / 28.5 Watt |
   
| |
Leggenda:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS 7100U, HD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3 | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, , 1920x1080, 13.3 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX), TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6 | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 14 | HP ProBook 440 G4 Z2Y47ES 7100U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, TN, 1920x1080, 14 | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -19% | -25% | -20% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 3.1 11% | 5.2 -49% | 5 -43% | 5.7 -63% | 4.1 -17% |
| Idle Average * | 5.7 | 5.5 4% | 7.25 -27% | 6.8 -19% | 6.8 -19% | 6.8 -19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.2 | 6 3% | 7.9 -27% | 8.9 -44% | 7.8 -26% | 7.9 -27% |
| Load Average * | 24.1 | 25.8 -7% | 25.1 -4% | 26.2 -9% | 20.2 16% | 20.4 15% |
| Load Maximum * | 28.5 | 33.6 -18% | 25.1 12% | 31.8 -12% | 30.6 -7% | 26.8 6% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS 7100U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G4 Z2Y47ES 7100U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomia della batteria | -9% | 9% | -20% | 22% | -9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 989 | 944 -5% | 885 -11% | 668 -32% | 1210 22% | 749 -24% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 580 | 372 -36% | 566 -2% | 278 -52% | 463 -20% | |
| Load | 113 | 129 14% | 157 39% | 140 24% | 133 18% | |
| WiFi | 603 |
Pro
Contro
Il ThinkPad 13 si piazza bene. Il set di feature ha molto punti sorprendenti rispetto ai più maturi fratelli ThinkPad serie T ed X. La tastiera è tra le migliori a disposizione, l'autonomia è abbastanza buona per una giornata di lavoro, e le prestazioni sono adeguate, o leggermente deludenti. Tuttavia, ci sono alcuni elementi che sono stati eliminati per abbassare il prezzo. La tastiera non è illuminata e manca una porta Thunderbolt 3 il che limita la connettività.
Forse il principale problema qui è il prezzo. Per un sistema che cosa oltre $1000, il nostro ThinkPad 13 offre specifiche poco esaltanti. Anche il modello base del ThinkPad 13 monta una Intel Celeron 3865U (1.8 GHz, 2 MB Cache) e un display TN 1366x768 e costa $700 al momento della recensione. Molti dispositivi con interni migliori sono disponibili a prezzi inferiori. Tuttavia non li inseriamo nel confronto, sia l'Asus Zenbook UX305UA che il Dell XPS 13 (2016) possono essere configurati con doppia RAM e archiviazione oltre a CPU Core i5 ULV per quasi lo stesso prezzo del nostro modello (e qualcosa in meno).
Nel complesso, il ThinkPad 13 è un buon pacchetto per utenti business che vogliono qualcosa che sia tra la serie Lenovo Y da 12.5" e la serie T da 14". L'ampia autonomia e i dispositivi di input eccezionali bilanciano i compromessi che dovrete accettare. Tuttavia il passaggio alla Kaby Lake non vale il prezzo. Suggeriamo di aspettare un calo dei prezzi o cercare un modello 2016 ThinkPad 13 con processore Skylake.
Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS - 04/28/2017 v6
Sam Medley