Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Dell Latitude 3180 (N4200, HD)

Sascha Mölck (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 04/25/2017

Duraturo. Questo 11.6" Latitude monta un veloce SSD, un sistema silenzioso, e una buona autonomia. Dell richiede un prezzo elevato. Circa 580 Euro. Il sistema operativo Windows 10 Pro è il principale motivo del prezzo elevato.

Dell Latitude 3180
Scheda grafica
Intel HD Graphics 505, Core: 300-750 MHz, 21.20.16.4627
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
11.6 pollici 16:9, 1366x768 pixel 135 PPI, BOE NT11621, TN LED, lucido: no
Harddisk
Liteonit CV3-8D128, 128 GB 
, 86 GB libera
Scheda audio
Realtek ALC256 @ Intel Apollo Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: combo audio, Lettore schede: micro-SD, TPM 2.0
Rete
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 23 x 332.9 x 231.8
Batteria
42 Wh, 3500 mAh ioni di litio, 11.4 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: SD
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, Tastiera: chiclet, McAfee LiveSafe (trial), MS Office Home e Student 2016 (trial), 12 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
1.63 kg, Alimentazione: 325 gr
Prezzo
580 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Connectivity

Right: combo audio, cable-lock slot
Right: combo audio, cable-lock slot
Left: power-in, memory-card reader (micro-SD), HDMI, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-A)
Left: power-in, memory-card reader (micro-SD), HDMI, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-A)
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
543 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
655 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (seb)
238 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (seb)
82 MBit/s ∼100%
219
cd/m²
227
cd/m²
216
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 253 cd/m² Media: 235.8 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 85 %
Al centro con la batteria: 253 cd/m²
Contrasto: 538:1 (Nero: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.87 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 13.97 | - Ø
61% sRGB (Argyll) 39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.46
Dell Latitude 3180
TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6
Dell Latitude 11 3150
TN, 1366x768, 11
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6
HP Stream 11-r000ng
TN, 1366x768, 11.6
Medion Akoya S2218
IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6
Response Times
-7%
-1%
2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (22, 18)
38 (18, 20)
5%
44 (24, 20)
-10%
27 (7, 20)
32%
Response Time Black / White *
26 (20, 6)
31 (14, 17)
-19%
24 (8, 16)
8%
33 (14, 19)
-27%
PWM Frequency
200 (90)
200 (90)
0%
Screen
-14%
7%
6%
37%
Brightness
236
219
-7%
215
-9%
248
5%
394
67%
Brightness Distribution
85
72
-15%
85
0%
84
-1%
88
4%
Black Level *
0.47
0.81
-72%
0.38
19%
0.5
-6%
0.43
9%
Contrast
538
290
-46%
574
7%
528
-2%
970
80%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
12.87
9.67
25%
10.29
20%
9.78
24%
6.7
48%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
13.97
11
21%
11.71
16%
11.16
20%
6.25
55%
Gamma
2.46 98%
2.2 109%
2.45 98%
2.44 98%
2.48 97%
CCT
18336 35%
11769 55%
14164 46%
12954 50%
5954 109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
37
-5%
40
3%
41
5%
46
18%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
61
63
3%
63
3%
69
13%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-14% / -14%
0% / 5%
3% / 5%
20% / 27%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 55 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8587 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms Incremento
↘ 6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms Incremento
↘ 18 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1638
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
5440
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
32.61
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
51 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
19.87 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Aiuto
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points ∼27% +4%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points ∼27% +4%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
51 Points ∼26%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
50 Points ∼25% -2%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
42 Points ∼21% -18%
Dell Latitude 11 3150
Intel Pentium N3540
41 Points ∼21% -20%
HP Stream 11-r000ng
Intel Celeron N3050
28 Points ∼14% -45%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
175 Points ∼8%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
174 Points ∼8% -1%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
165 Points ∼8% -6%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
165 Points ∼8% -6%
Dell Latitude 11 3150
Intel Pentium N3540
152 Points ∼7% -13%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
150 Points ∼7% -14%
HP Stream 11-r000ng
Intel Celeron N3050
57 Points ∼3% -67%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1677 Points ∼19% +2%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1675 Points ∼19% +2%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
1638 Points ∼18%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
1633 Points ∼18% 0%
Dell Latitude 11 3150
Intel Pentium N3540
1339 Points ∼15% -18%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
1238 Points ∼14% -24%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
5440 Points ∼11%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
5346 Points ∼11% -2%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
5284 Points ∼11% -3%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
5149 Points ∼10% -5%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
4649 Points ∼9% -15%
Dell Latitude 11 3150
Intel Pentium N3540
4496 Points ∼9% -17%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
4736 Points ∼15%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
4563 Points ∼15% -4%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
4425 Points ∼14% -7%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
3553 Points ∼11% -25%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
1400 Points ∼30%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1395 Points ∼30% 0%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1362 Points ∼29% -3%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
1023 Points ∼22% -27%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
4558 Points ∼17%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
4364 Points ∼16% -4%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
4162 Points ∼15% -9%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1581 Points ∼27% +3%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1555 Points ∼27% +1%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
1541 Points ∼27%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
4719 Points ∼19%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
1571 Points ∼26%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
90.06 Points ∼0% +3%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
89.082 Points ∼0% +2%
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel Pentium N4200
87.494 Points ∼0%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
84.572 Points ∼0% -3%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
36.78 Points ∼0% -58%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2314 punti
Aiuto
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 3180
HD Graphics 505, N4200, Liteonit CV3-8D128
2314 Points ∼39%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256
1999 Points ∼33% -14%
HP Stream 11-r000ng
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1487 Points ∼25% -36%
Medion Akoya S2218
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1027 Points ∼17% -56%
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Sequential Read: 482.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 213.2 MB/s
512K Read: 276.5 MB/s
512K Write: 162.6 MB/s
4K Read: 18.17 MB/s
4K Write: 44.77 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 132.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 118.1 MB/s
Dell Latitude 3180
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Dell Latitude 11 3150
Samsung SSD PM851 128 GB MZ7TE128HMGR
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Liteonit CV3-8D256
HP Stream 11-r000ng
32 GB eMMC Flash
Medion Akoya S2218
64 GB eMMC Flash
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-25%
25%
-58%
-67%
Write 4k QD32
118.1
98.57
-17%
111.2
-6%
13.21
-89%
8.734
-93%
Read 4k QD32
132.7
117.4
-12%
123.5
-7%
46.51
-65%
37.24
-72%
Write 4k
44.77
39.21
-12%
45.56
2%
13.16
-71%
9.817
-78%
Read 4k
18.17
13.5
-26%
23.35
29%
18.25
0%
15.25
-16%
Write 512
162.6
124.8
-23%
282.5
74%
59.93
-63%
58.71
-64%
Read 512
276.5
229.2
-17%
329.1
19%
165.8
-40%
98.4
-64%
Write Seq
213.2
124.4
-42%
393.4
85%
76.57
-64%
52.67
-75%
Read Seq
482.6
251.5
-48%
505.8
5%
154.2
-68%
140.2
-71%
3DMark 11 Performance
899 punti
Aiuto
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Latitude 3180
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
825 Points ∼2%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
624 Points ∼1% -24%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
583 Points ∼1% -29%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
473 Points ∼1% -43%
HP Stream 11-r000ng
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
375 Points ∼1% -55%
Dell Latitude 11 3150
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Pentium N3540
227 Points ∼0% -72%
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 32.318.616.2fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 5.1fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 14.4fps
For Honor (2017) 12.1fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 5.9fps
Carico massimo
 38.2 °C40.6 °C29.2 °C 
 37.5 °C37.7 °C27.5 °C 
 27.1 °C25.5 °C25.8 °C 
Massima: 40.6 °C
Media: 32.1 °C
31 °C47.4 °C48.4 °C
27.4 °C45.4 °C41.3 °C
25.2 °C27.5 °C27.1 °C
Massima: 48.4 °C
Media: 35.6 °C
Alimentazione (max)  33.7 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.936.738.92537.733.737.73136.331.136.34038.731.138.75039.429.939.46339.832.139.88039.929.839.91004229.44212542.225.242.216044.525.244.520047.624.947.625049.223.249.231554.322.554.340055.421.255.450056.420.756.463063.719.663.780067.719.267.7100065.318.465.3125062.917.962.9160060.617.660.6200062.816.962.825006216.962315062.817.162.8400066.616.966.6500068.316.768.3630061.516.861.5800058.816.658.81000058.316.658.31250055.316.455.31600055.616.455.6SPL75.830.275.8N371.437median 58.8Dell Latitude 3180median 17.9median 58.8Delta4.83.24.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Dell Latitude 3180 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.16 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.1 / 4.1 / 5.5 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 14.6 / 15.7 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3 (Edge 40)
10ore 21minuti
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Dell Latitude 3180
N4200, HD Graphics 505, 42 Wh
621 min ∼52%
Dell Latitude 11 3150
N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 40 Wh
591 min ∼49% -5%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 49 Wh
584 min ∼49% -6%
HP Stream 11-r000ng
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 37 Wh
515 min ∼43% -17%
Medion Akoya S2218
Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 43 Wh
500 min ∼42% -19%

Pro

+ schermo matto
+ silenzioso
+ SSD M.2 2280
+ ottima autonomia

Contro

- schermo scuro, contrasto basso, angoli di visuale stretti
- manca una USB Type-C
- prezzo
Dell Latitude 11 3180, courtesy of Dell Germany
Dell Latitude 11 3180, courtesy of Dell Germany

Dell realizza un portatile da 11.6" pensando alla scuola con il suo Latitude 11 3180. Pertanto, ha un robusto case in plastica. Il processore Apollo Lake ha abbastanza potenza di calcolo per ufficio e applicazioni Internet. Il portatile è silenzioso e non si scalda molto.

Dell realizza una macchina compatta e duratura per gli istituti scolastici con il suo Latitude 11 3180.

Un SSD garantisce un sistema veloce. Sarebbe possibile sostituire l'SSD. Tuttavia, bisogna aprire il case. Inoltre non tutte le versioni del portatile hanno un SSD. I modelli più economici montano un dispositivo di archiviazione fisso eMMC, e la sostituzione non è possibile. L'autonomia è sorprendente. La decente tastiera è adatta a chi scrive molto.

Lo schermo è deludente. Dell usa un modello scuro, con contrasto basso e angoli di visuale limitati che contrastano le finalità di utilizzo. Sul sito Dell si legge che il PC può essere messo su un tavolo piatto per vedere meglio i contenuti grazie alla cerniera a 180°. Questo sarebbe possibile solo con un pannello IPS. Tuttavia, il portatile usa un pannello TN con angoli di visuale limitati. Oltre questo, lo schermo che è pensato per l'utilizzo solo a scuola non dovrebbe avere PWM-flickering.

Il nostro modello costa 489 Euro sul negozio Dell al momento del test - molto per un semplice dispositivo da ufficio. Pertanto il portatile non è una buona opzione per i clienti privati.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Dell Latitude 3180 - 04/19/2017 v6
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
77 /  98 → 79%
Tastiera
76%
Dispositivo di puntamento
88%
Connettività
38 / 80 → 48%
Peso
67 / 78 → 75%
Batteria
93%
Display
76%
Prestazioni di gioco
52 / 68 → 76%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
61 / 87 → 70%
Temperatura
92 / 91 → 100%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Fotocamera
44 / 85 → 52%
Media
70%
80%
Subnotebook - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Dell Latitude 3180 (N4200, HD)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-04-25 (Update: 2017-04-25)