Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Eurocom Sky X9C (i7-8700K, GTX 1080 SLI, Clevo P870TM1-G)

Allen Ngo (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 01/02/2018

Cinque Kg di pura potenza. Concludiamo il 2017 con il piiù potente portatile gaming attualmente a disposizione. CPU Core i7-8700K, GPUs GTX 1080 SLI, schermo 4K UHD, 1 TB di spazio NVMe RAID 0, e 64 GB i RAM DDR4 sono specifiche astronomiche per queste dimensioni.

Eurocom Sky X9C (Sky Serie)
Processore
Intel Core i7-8700K
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1657 MHz, Memoria: 10010 MHz, GDDR5X, 388.31
Memoria
65536 MB 
, 1333.3 MHz (overclock a 1497.4 MHz), 16-18-18-39, Dual-Channel
Schermo
17.3 pollici 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, ID: AUO109B, Name: AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Harddisk
2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0), 2048 GB 
, Secondario: 4 TB Western Digital WD40NMZW-11GX651
Scheda audio
NVIDIA GP104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
5 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: 7.1 out, headphone out, microphone in, S/PDIF and Line-in port, Lettore schede: SDXC reader
Rete
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 47.2 x 428 x 308
Batteria
89 Wh, 5700 mAh ioni di litio, 8-celle
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 2 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Casse FOSTER (2W) + Subwoofer (2.5W), Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Control Center, FlexiKey, GPU Overclock, CPU Overclock, 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
5.56 kg, Alimentazione: 1.77 kg
Prezzo
7500 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: USB 3.0, card reader, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C with Thunderbolt 3, 2x Mini-DisplayPort 1.3, Kensington Lock
Right: USB 3.0, card reader, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C with Thunderbolt 3, 2x Mini-DisplayPort 1.3, Kensington Lock
Rear: HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0, AC power
Rear: HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0, AC power
Left side: 2x Gigabit RJ-45, 3x USB 3.0, 4x audio
Left side: 2x Gigabit RJ-45, 3x USB 3.0, 4x audio
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
700 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
668 MBit/s ∼95%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼87% -9%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
594 MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
558 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
317.1
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
316.3
cd/m²
331.2
cd/m²
347.7
cd/m²
319.8
cd/m²
315.2
cd/m²
317.3
cd/m²
303.2
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Massima: 347.7 cd/m² Media: 323.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.45 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 87 %
Al centro con la batteria: 347.7 cd/m²
Contrasto: 869:1 (Nero: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.39 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
100% sRGB (Argyll) 87.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.4
Eurocom Sky X9C
ID: AUO109B, Name: AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Alienware 17 R4
TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3, 3840x2160
Schenker XMG U727 2017
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), AHVA, 17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
44%
75%
22%
-36%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43.6 (24, 19.6)
30 (18.8, 11.2)
31%
11.6 (6.4, 5.2)
73%
38 (13, 25)
13%
60.8 (28.8, 32)
-39%
44 (14, 30)
-1%
Response Time Black / White *
28.8 (17.2, 11.6)
12.8 (10.8, 2)
56%
6.8 (4.8, 2)
76%
20 (4, 16)
31%
38.4 (22, 16.4)
-33%
28 (6, 22)
3%
PWM Frequency
25000 (15)
204.9 (20)
Screen
-8%
23%
9%
3%
20%
Brightness middle
347.7
402.3
16%
274
-21%
306
-12%
230
-34%
362
4%
Brightness
324
372
15%
262
-19%
299
-8%
207
-36%
344
6%
Brightness Distribution
87
86
-1%
87
0%
91
5%
83
-5%
85
-2%
Black Level *
0.4
0.62
-55%
0.26
35%
0.27
32%
0.2
50%
0.35
12%
Contrast
869
649
-25%
1054
21%
1133
30%
1150
32%
1034
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.39
5.6
12%
1.36
79%
3.98
38%
5.62
12%
2.46
62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.69
9.8
-1%
4.1
58%
7.29
25%
10.24
-6%
4.26
56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4.7
13%
0.64
88%
4.15
23%
4.54
16%
2.9
46%
Gamma
2.4 100%
2.14 112%
2.19 110%
2.45 98%
2.36 102%
2.31 104%
CCT
6271 104%
7519 86%
6551 99%
7386 88%
6625 98%
6120 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87.8
53.7
-39%
77
-12%
58
-34%
88
0%
88
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
82.2
-18%
100
0%
89
-11%
100
0%
100
0%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
18% / 0%
49% / 32%
16% / 11%
-17% / -4%
11% / 17%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms Incremento
↘ 11.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 65 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms Incremento
↘ 19.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
199 Points ∼34% +5%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼32% 0%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
190 Points ∼32%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
174 Points ∼30% -8%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
160 Points ∼27% -16%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼27% -16%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
154 Points ∼26% -19%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
149 Points ∼25% -22%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼24% -24%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
143 Points ∼24% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼66% +6%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
1405 (min: 1375.04, max: 1405.28) Points ∼65% +5%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1334 Points ∼62%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼42% -33%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
874 Points ∼41% -34%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
837 Points ∼39% -37%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼34% -45%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
724 Points ∼34% -46%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼32% -49%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
519 Points ∼24% -61%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.27 Points ∼100% +2%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.23 Points ∼98%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼96% -2%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.97 Points ∼87% -12%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.77 Points ∼78% -21%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.72 Points ∼76% -23%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points ∼74% -25%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.67 Points ∼74% -25%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.66 Points ∼73% -26%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼72% -27%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼66% +5%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.64 Points ∼65% +4%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.02 Points ∼63%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼41% -35%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.19 Points ∼38% -39%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
8.55 Points ∼36% -43%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.94 Points ∼33% -47%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.49 Points ∼31% -50%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.14 Points ∼30% -52%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
5.76 Points ∼24% -62%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7423 Points ∼84%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
7413 Points ∼84% 0%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼81% -3%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
6501 Points ∼73% -12%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
6434 Points ∼73% -13%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5550 Points ∼63% -25%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5550 Points ∼63% -25%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5521 Points ∼62% -26%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼48% -42%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
39624 Points ∼80% +1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
39382 Points ∼79%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼59% -26%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% -28%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
23815 Points ∼48% -40%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
21755 Points ∼44% -45%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
20943 Points ∼42% -47%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20639 Points ∼41% -48%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
16329 Points ∼33% -59%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
402.56 s * ∼5% -245%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
212.117 s * ∼3% -82%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
205.867 s * ∼2% -77%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% -51%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
118.6 s * ∼1% -2%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
116.591 s * ∼1%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
677.2 Seconds * ∼3% -50%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
565.334 Seconds * ∼3% -25%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
529.418 Seconds * ∼2% -17%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
509.5 Seconds * ∼2% -12%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
484.635 Seconds * ∼2% -7%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
452.938 Seconds * ∼2%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
442.8 Seconds * ∼2% +2%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +3%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15780
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
39382
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7423
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
90.81 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
15.02 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.23 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
140.75 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1334 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
8786 Points ∼93%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
7166 Points ∼76% -18%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5819 Points ∼62% -34%
Productivity
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
8657 Points ∼91%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
7460 Points ∼78% -14%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
6481 Points ∼68% -25%
Essentials
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
9775 Points ∼97%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
8396 Points ∼83% -14%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
7724 Points ∼77% -21%
Score
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
6495 Points ∼84%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
5489 Points ∼71% -15%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4752 Points ∼61% -27%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
6515 Points ∼100% +28%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
5487 Points ∼84% +8%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5159 Points ∼79% +1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
5095 Points ∼78%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4816 Points ∼74% -5%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
9529 Points ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
8593 Points ∼90% -10%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8576 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5364 Points ∼56% -44%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5476 Points ∼92% +9%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
5159 Points ∼86% +3%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
5005 Points ∼84%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4579 Points ∼77% -9%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4207 Points ∼70% -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5005 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
9529 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5095 punti
Aiuto
Eurocom Sky X9C
2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CrystalDiskMark 5.2
Write 4K
165
155.1
96.08
174.1
Read 4K
55.87
44.22
38.91
48.07
Write Seq
2612
311.2
467.9
1444
Read Seq
3377
1247
494.2
1008
Write 4K Q32T1
548.3
310.3
188.9
512
Read 4K Q32T1
624.7
551.2
205.9
632
Write Seq Q32T1
2944
311.5
461.2
1522
Read Seq Q32T1
3407
1560
450.8
3111
No HDD benchmark entry found!
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
9770 Points ∼97%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
8894 Points ∼88% -9%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
6722 Points ∼66% -31%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
4841 Points ∼48% -50%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
4048 Points ∼40% -59%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
2522 Points ∼25% -74%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Combined
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
9374 Points ∼76%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
8279 Points ∼68% -12%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
7871 Points ∼64% -16%
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
7321 Points ∼60% -22%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ
7176 Points ∼59% -23%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
6946 Points ∼57% -26%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
6651 Points ∼54% -29%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
5639 Points ∼46% -40%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
5090 Points ∼42% -46%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
4260 Points ∼35% -55%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ
40636 Points ∼100% 0%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
40582 Points ∼100%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
34226 Points ∼84% -16%
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
32640 Points ∼80% -20%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
28366 Points ∼70% -30%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
21366 Points ∼53% -47%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
20268 Points ∼50% -50%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
19121 Points ∼47% -53%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18219 Points ∼45% -55%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11049 Points ∼27% -73%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
14119 Points ∼80%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
11623 Points ∼66% -18%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
11599 Points ∼66% -18%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
11584 Points ∼66% -18%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
10313 Points ∼59% -27%
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
9929 Points ∼56% -30%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
9878 Points ∼56% -30%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ
9755 Points ∼56% -31%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8935 Points ∼51% -37%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8830 Points ∼50% -37%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ
50923 Points ∼100% +9%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
46773 Points ∼92%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
42691 Points ∼84% -9%
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
41469 Points ∼81% -11%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
38959 Points ∼76% -17%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
29443 Points ∼58% -37%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
29109 Points ∼57% -38%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23540 Points ∼46% -50%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
21901 Points ∼43% -53%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
13668 Points ∼27% -71%
3DMark 11 Performance
30042 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
192638 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45068 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
26751 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
17060 punti
Aiuto
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
87.4 fps ∼100%
Asus GX800VH Prototype
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 6820HK
78.4 fps ∼90% -10%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
74 (min: 66, max: 88) fps ∼85% -15%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
70.9 (min: 63, max: 78) fps ∼81% -19%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
68.4 (min: 61, max: 75) fps ∼78% -22%
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
53 fps ∼61% -39%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
46.5 (min: 41, max: 52) fps ∼53% -47%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
43.6 fps ∼50% -50%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
22.9 (min: 20) fps ∼26% -74%
Destiny 2 - 3840x2160 Highest Preset AA:SM AF:16x
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
80.3 fps ∼100%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
58.1 fps ∼72% -28%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
51.5 (99th percentile: 22.8) fps ∼64% -36%
Middle-earth: Shadow of War - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
55 fps ∼100%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
51 (min: 22, max: 171) fps ∼93% -7%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
45 (min: 3, max: 99) fps ∼82% -18%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
34 (min: 21, max: 50) fps ∼62% -38%
Ashes of the Singularity - 3840x2160 crazy
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
58.4 fps ∼100% +25%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
46.7 fps ∼80%
Mafia 3 - 3840x2160 High Preset
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
36.7 (min: 34, max: 40) fps ∼100% +10%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
33.4 fps ∼91%
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
27.8 (min: 24, max: 32) fps ∼76% -17%
basso medio alto ultra4K
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 150.384.377.8fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 398.4347.3295.5265.6fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 196194.8192.8172.1fps
Thief (2014) 150.1147.5144.5141.9fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 357229.8184.3106.487.1fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 2021861509957fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 6060606060fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 212.9219.5174.5167.6100fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 122.8110.699.8103.587.4fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 109.8105.9100.646.7fps
Overwatch (2016) 300300300300216.3fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 134.411579.933.4fps
Prey (2017) 14414414414384fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 360.8245.7122.582.654.9fps
F1 2017 (2017) 23717815210956fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 981231069255fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 148.4121.9116.2113.180.3fps
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960Tooltip
The Witcher 3 4K

Rumorosità

Idle
34.2 / 39.6 / 39.6 dB(A)
Sotto carico
48.5 / 56.5 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 28.4 dB(A)
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Noise
4%
-3%
8%
-3%
7%
off / environment *
28.4
28.2
1%
31
-9%
28.9
-2%
30
-6%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
34.2
35.6
-4%
35
-2%
28.9
15%
35
-2%
30
12%
Idle Average *
39.6
35.6
10%
38
4%
30.6
23%
37
7%
31
22%
Idle Maximum *
39.6
35.7
10%
41
-4%
35.7
10%
43
-9%
33
17%
Load Average *
48.5
50.2
-4%
52
-7%
49
-1%
49
-1%
43
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54
50.2
7%
53
2%
56
-4%
55
-2%
Load Maximum *
56.5
50.2
11%
59
-4%
55
3%
60
-6%
58
-3%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 27.8 °C44.6 °C36.8 °C 
 25.2 °C32 °C27.4 °C 
 22.6 °C32 °C27.4 °C 
Massima: 44.6 °C
Media: 30.6 °C
39 °C48 °C34.2 °C
40.2 °C44.4 °C26.8 °C
33.6 °C29.6 °C21.8 °C
Massima: 48 °C
Media: 35.3 °C
Alimentazione (max)  24.4 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.135.22533.333.93131.633.24030.732.45030.630.96328.729.98028.332.810027.64412526.452.716027.756.72002854.425029.856.231530.258.94002864.350031.468.363031.768.580026.168.9100026.269.1125024.865.5160025.264.5200028.164.1250027.363.231502561400021.365500020.962.7630020.558800020.651.31000020.744.21250020.739.21600020.533.6SPL38.276.7N339.4median 26.2Eurocom Sky X9Cmedian 61Delta2.16.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Eurocom Sky X9C audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 7.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 54.7 / 55.7 / 56.8 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 183.7 / 321.8 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eurocom Sky X9C
8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
7920HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 18.4
Aorus X9
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, TN, 2560x1440, 17.3
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
4980HQ, GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0), Wide View, Super PLS, 1920x1080, 18.4
Power Consumption
34%
-9%
28%
19%
Idle Minimum *
54.7
37.5
31%
45
18%
29
47%
34.3
37%
Idle Average *
55.7
37.6
32%
54
3%
35
37%
41.9
25%
Idle Maximum *
56.8
37.6
34%
62
-9%
42
26%
49.3
13%
Load Average *
183.7
122.4
33%
178
3%
140
24%
140.2
24%
Load Maximum *
321.8
277.4
14%
586
-82%
334
-4%
328.6
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
454.8
180.3
60%
380
16%
295
35%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
1ore 23minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
1ore 18minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
0ore 47minuti
Eurocom Sky X9C
8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 89 Wh
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
7920HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 75.24 Wh
Aorus X9
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Eurocom Sky X7E2
6700K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 89 Wh
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
1700, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 76 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
137%
51%
78%
58%
17%
Reader / Idle
83
276
233%
146
76%
174
110%
137
65%
103
24%
WiFi v1.3
78
181
132%
118
51%
134
72%
104
33%
90
15%
Load
47
69
47%
59
26%
71
51%
83
77%
53
13%

Pro

+ prestazioni CPU più veloci nel suo segmento di mercato; socket desktop LGA 1151
+ temperature di superficie buone con carichi pesanti
+ 5x bays di archiviazione; opzioni PCIe x4 NVMe e RAID
+ clock rates CPU e GPU consistenti
+ temperature basse dell'alimentatore
+ casse potenti e bassi decenti
+ manutenzione abbastanza facile
+ molte possibilità di personalizzazione
+ CPU e GPU sbloccate
+ ottima qualità di costruzione

Contro

- strano comportamento dei consumi con scenari di carico irrealistici
- elevate temperature CPU con carichi estremi
- ventole sempre attive; molto rumoroso durante il gaming
- autonomia molto breve; batteria non removibile
- porte audio ESS Sabre DAC non placcate
- prestazioni SLI con gli utltimi titoli
- l'accesso ai bays di archiviazione è complicato
- elevate temperature GPU durante il gaming
- leggero effetto bleeding della retroilluminazione
- il controllo manuale delle ventole potrebbe essere migliore
- l'alimentatore necessita di un raffreddamento attivo
- schermo matto leggermente granuloso
- tasti senza illuminazione RGB individuale
- leggero sovraccarico con l'overclocking
In review: Eurocom Sky X9C. Test model provided by Eurocom
In review: Eurocom Sky X9C. Test model provided by Eurocom

Abbiamo chiarito in passato il nostro pensiero sull'SLI. Per finalità gaming, la SLI è stata sempre una situazione mista. L'avvento della DX12 in particolare ha reso ancora più difficile raccomandare la SLI in quanto l'API ora relega la multi ottimizzazione GPU nelle mani dei singoli sviluppatori invece che in quelle di Nvidia. Il buon supporto SLI sta diventando molto discutibile ed i valori del benchmark rafforzano questa idea. Coloro che vogliono una SLI in un portatile dovrebbero avere specifici motivi per scegliere questa tecnologia in quanto la GPU extra in molti casi può peggiorare la situazione.

Detto questo, l'Eurocom Sky X9C ha superato velocemente la maggioranza dei nostri benchmarks grazie alla sua configurazione estrema ed al Core i7-ì8700K. I componenti modulari e l'ampia gamma di funzioni hardware supportate continuano ad essere l'highlight dell'avere un Eurocom rispetto ad alternative di altri produttori famosi.

Restano anche gli stessi svantaggi che abbiamo riscontrato sui recenti portatili Eurocom testati. Le prestazioni elevate comportano una rumorosità della ventola notevole (54 dB(A)), temperature core molto elevate (>85° C), peso notevole (5.6 kg), ed autonomia breve che può essere misurata in minuti. Mentre peso ed autonomia non sono fattori importanti per i portatili gaming, le temperature limitano molto il potenziale overclocking e la rumorosità è nemica di una buona qualità di gioco. Non siamo in grado di dirvi come si sarebbe comportato questo sistema rimuovendo l'SLI e dimezzando il numero di dissipatori per CPU e GPU. Ma siamo pronti a scommettere che le conseguenti temperature minori, ventole più silenzio, valori clock Boost superiori, e maggiore potenziale overclocking avrebbero comportato migliori prestazioni gaming anche se i punteggi del synthetic benchmark sarebbero stati inferiori rispetto alla configurazione SLI.

Alcuni aspetti dello chassis e del software sembrano incollati al passato. L'assenza dei tasti con illuminazione RGB singola diventano difficili da perdonare e i componenti in plastica della base del display appaiono cheap rispetto al design Alienware. Il Control Center e le utilities overclocking sono focalizzate nel creare una GUI "Fisher-Price" con font grandi invece di un'interfaccia facilmente accessibile senza perdersi in troppe finestre. Le features più utili per i gamers come la registrazione dati, registrazione video, regolazione diretta RPM di ogni ventola, e la gestione delle performance mancano ancora nel software preinstallato.

Per avere la migliore esperienza gaming, gli utenti farebbero meglio a configurare lo Sky X9C con una sola GTX 1080 e poi effettuare l'overclocking. I giocatori con un budget limitato possono avere le stesse prestazioni con un processore meno assetato da 45 W HQ-class in quanto la maggior parte dei titoli non sono vincolati alla CPU. Assicuratevi di avere un buon paio di cuffie durante il gaming!

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Eurocom Sky X9C - 12/29/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Chassis
78 / 98 → 80%
Tastiera
85%
Dispositivo di puntamento
81%
Connettività
71 / 81 → 88%
Peso
31 / 10-66 → 37%
Batteria
49%
Display
88%
Prestazioni di gioco
98%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
98%
Temperatura
88 / 95 → 92%
Rumorosità
52 / 90 → 57%
Audio
90%
Fotocamera
37 / 85 → 43%
Media
73%
85%
Gaming - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Eurocom Sky X9C (i7-8700K, GTX 1080 SLI, Clevo P870TM1-G)
Allen Ngo, 2018-01- 2 (Update: 2018-01- 2)