Recensione breve del Portatile Razer Blade (2016) FHD

Name: Recensione breve del Portatile Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Item: Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Rating: 84
Author: Sascha Mölck

Sascha Mölck (traduzione a cura di G.De Luca), 01/02/2017

Gaming Geforce Notebook Skylake Windows

Un successo. Questo sottile Razer da 14" monta hardware potente che riesce a gestire tutti i giochi moderni sullo schermo matto Full HD. Avrete anche buoni dispositivi di input ed una Thunderbolt 3. Anche la resistenza di questo piccolo sistema non è male.

Dispositivo di test fornito da Razer DE

(download rating image as PNG or SVG)

I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	677 MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Razer Blade (2016) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	646 MBit/s ∼95% +26%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	513 MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade (2016) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	591 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	561 MBit/s ∼95%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	507 MBit/s ∼86% -10%


296 cd/m²	286 cd/m²	296 cd/m²
278 cd/m²	272 cd/m²	270 cd/m²
276 cd/m²	249 cd/m²	271 cd/m²

Distribuzione della luminosità

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Massima: 296 cd/m² Media: 277.1 cd/m² Minimum: 30 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 84 %
Al centro con la batteria: 272 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1046:1 (Nero: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.28 | - Ø
83% sRGB (Argyll) 55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.23

ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080	Razer Blade (2016) Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), 3200x1800	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 1920x1080	Gigabyte P34W v5 2560x1440	Schenker XMG P406 LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), 1920x1080	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080
Response Times		-15%	20%	7%	-17%	10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	47	41 13%	31.6 33%	41.2 12%	56 -19%	40 15%
Response Time Black / White *	26	37 -42%	24.4 6%	25.4 2%	30 -15%	25 4%
PWM Frequency		200
Screen		26%	-6%	-1%	3%	1%
Brightness	277	328 18%	282 2%	270 -3%	266 -4%	296 7%
Brightness Distribution	84	69 -18%	83 -1%	83 -1%	81 -4%	88 5%
Black Level *	0.26	0.22 15%	0.57 -119%	0.38 -46%	0.22 15%	0.33 -27%
Contrast	1046	1491 43%	506 -52%	731 -30%	1282 23%	973 -7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.59	1.91 58%	2.61 43%	2.71 41%	4.98 -8%	4.42 4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.28	1.69 61%	1.18 72%	2.11 51%	4.08 5%	3.34 22%
Gamma	2.23 ^108%	2.3 ^104%	2.24 ^107%	2.19 ^110%	2.51 ^96%	2.4 ^100%
CCT	6848 ^95%	6418 ^101%	6506 ^100%	6314 ^103%	5877 ^111%	6213 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55	63 15%	56.4 3%	48.5 -12%	54 -2%	55 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	83	97 17%	86.4 4%	76.9 -7%	83 0%	83 0%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)		6% / 18%	7% / -1%	3% / 1%	-7% / -1%	6% / 2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4396 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

ℹ

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.

↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms Incremento
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms Incremento
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 33 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6777

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20639

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5550

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

62.89 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.49 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.68 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

93.61 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

678 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

149 Points

Aiuto

... in confronto

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	149 Points ∼67%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points ∼66% -1%
Razer Blade (2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	146 Points ∼65% -2%
Schenker XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points ∼63% -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	137 Points ∼61% -8%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	130 Points ∼58% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points ∼37% 0%
Schenker XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points ∼37% 0%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points ∼37% 0%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	678 Points ∼36%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	675 Points ∼36% 0%
Razer Blade (2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	671 Points ∼36% -1%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5550 Points ∼63%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5463 Points ∼62% -2%
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5460 Points ∼62% -2%
Schenker XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5348 Points ∼60% -4%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4937 Points ∼56% -11%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20639 Points ∼51%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20528 Points ∼51% -1%
Schenker XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20394 Points ∼51% -1%
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20195 Points ∼50% -2%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20111 Points ∼50% -3%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	12873 Points ∼41%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	12818 Points ∼41% 0%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	3542 Points ∼76%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	3459 Points ∼74% -2%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	13058 Points ∼49%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	12974 Points ∼48% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4326 Points ∼79%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4286 Points ∼78% -1%

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 38)	250.13 Points ∼1% +1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 38)	247.33 Points ∼1%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	236.39 Points ∼1% -4%

PCMark 7 Score		5874 punti
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4010 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4942 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4920 punti

Aiuto

... in confronto

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	5109 Points ∼78% +4%
Schenker XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5023 Points ∼77% +2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ	4920 Points ∼76%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4796 Points ∼74% -3%
Gigabyte P34W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	4649 Points ∼71% -6%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4214 Points ∼65% -14%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	4741 Points ∼79% +18%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4016 Points ∼67% 0%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ	4010 Points ∼67%
Gigabyte P34W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	3706 Points ∼62% -8%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3417 Points ∼57% -15%
Schenker XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3371 Points ∼56% -16%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Sequential Read: 1977 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1668 MB/s

512K Read: 800.1 MB/s

512K Write: 1030 MB/s

4K Read: 58.08 MB/s

4K Write: 145.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 591.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 508 MB/s

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD	Razer Blade (2016) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Gigabyte P34W v5 Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	Schenker XMG P406 Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-25%	-73%	8%	-14%	-58%
Write 4k QD32	508	480 -6%	156.3 -69%	418.9 -18%	287.3 -43%	301.5 -41%
Read 4k QD32	591.9	573.4 -3%	247.4 -58%	621.7 5%	320.5 -46%	246.7 -58%
Write 4k	145.6	139.6 -4%	35.31 -76%	167.3 15%	110.3 -24%	86.25 -41%
Read 4k	58.08	42.22 -27%	17.68 -70%	53.83 -7%	43.82 -25%	25.61 -56%
Write 512	1030	603.5 -41%	246.7 -76%	1483 44%	1285 25%	407.1 -60%
Read 512	800.1	654.8 -18%	223 -72%	936.6 17%	1149 44%	335 -58%
Write Seq	1668	603.4 -64%	299 -82%	1524 -9%	1290 -23%	462.7 -72%
Read Seq	1977	1296 -34%	335.3 -83%	2269 15%	1634 -17%	462.5 -77%

3DMark 06 Standard		25367 punti
3DMark 11 Performance		11616 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		78946 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		21402 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9117 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		4873 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score		3443 punti

Aiuto

... in confronto

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	3576 Points ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	3396 Points ∼95%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	11776 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	11622 Points ∼99% +8%
Razer Blade (2016) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	10890 Points ∼92% +1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	10791 Points ∼92%
Gigabyte P34W v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	7457 Points ∼63% -31%
Schenker XMG P406 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	7436 Points ∼63% -31%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	15387 Points ∼100% +14%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	14977 Points ∼97% +11%
Razer Blade (2016) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	13891 Points ∼90% +3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	13534 Points ∼88%
Gigabyte P34W v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	9691 Points ∼63% -28%
Schenker XMG P406 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	9649 Points ∼63% -29%

BioShock Infinite | Battlefield 4

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ	102.3 fps ∼100% +9%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ	102.1 fps ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ	94 fps ∼92%
Gigabyte P34W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	71.4 fps ∼70% -24%

Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ	99.8 fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ	94 fps ∼94%
Schenker XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	58.1 fps ∼58% -38%

	basso	medio	alto	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	347.4	312.1	261.9	131.7	fps
BioShock Infinite (2013)	184.5	164.6	148.3	94	fps
Battlefield 4 (2013)	168.1	167.8	154.1	94	fps
Anno 2205 (2015)	110.4	103.3	79.2	28.6	fps
XCOM 2 (2016)	85.5	62.8	52.8	27.8	fps
The Division (2016)	184.6	120.7	61.2	48.2	fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	67.9	54.8	49.4		fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	114.4	93.8	52.4	28.1	fps

Rumorosità

Idle		35 / 36 / 37 dB(A)
Sotto carico		43 / 57 dB(A)

	30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza) Rumorosità ambientale: 31 dB(A)

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	Schenker XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Noise		8%	5%	7%	4%	5%
off / environment *	31	30 3%	29.1 6%			31 -0%
Idle Minimum *	35	31 11%	32 9%	31.6 10%	30 14%	32 9%
Idle Average *	36	33 8%	32 11%	31.6 12%	32 11%	33 8%
Idle Maximum *	37	35 5%	33.5 9%	32.5 12%	40 -8%	34 8%
Load Average *	43	39 9%	50 -16%	46.5 -8%	47 -9%	44 -2%
Load Maximum *	57	51 11%	51.5 10%	52.5 8%	51 11%	53 7%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo

Idle


53.9 °C	49.2 °C	54 °C
44.3 °C	49.5 °C	47.5 °C
39.2 °C	39.9 °C	38.1 °C

Massima: 54 °C
Media: 46.2 °C


48.5 °C	49.4 °C	45.3 °C
46.2 °C	47 °C	40.5 °C
39.8 °C	40.2 °C	37.5 °C

Massima: 49.4 °C
Media: 43.8 °C

Alimentazione (max) 49.6 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	Schenker XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Heat		-2%	-22%	-11%	-27%	-24%
Maximum Upper Side *	54	52.7 2%	55.6 -3%	59.3 -10%	55 -2%	65.3 -21%
Maximum Bottom *	49.4	48.4 2%	62.4 -26%	56.5 -14%	58.7 -19%	64.4 -30%
Idle Upper Side *	28	29.3 -5%	33.2 -19%	27.8 1%	36.9 -32%	35.4 -26%
Idle Bottom *	26.8	28.4 -6%	37.2 -39%	31.8 -19%	41.7 -56%	31.6 -18%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Razer Blade (2016) FHD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.8 Watt
Idle	14 / 18 / 21 Watt
Sotto carico	70 / 146 Watt


Leggenda: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 940

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	Schenker XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Power Consumption		13%	-9%	-5%	-7%
Idle Minimum *	14	9 36%	12.1 14%	12 14%	16 -14%
Idle Average *	18	14 22%	19 -6%	16 11%	19 -6%
Idle Maximum *	21	22 -5%	19.5 7%	22 -5%	23 -10%
Load Average *	70	72 -3%	106.7 -52%	90 -29%	68 3%
Load Maximum *	146	124 15%	159 -9%	170 -16%	157 -8%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria

Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)		12ore 40minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3 (Edge 38)		7ore 07minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5ore 12minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)		0ore 59minuti

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 70 Wh	Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 70 Wh	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 61 Wh	Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 61 Wh	Schenker XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 45 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
Autonomia della batteria		-43%	-10%	-38%	-32%	-21%
Reader / Idle	760		577 -24%	392 -48%	275 -64%	315 -59%
Load	59		78 32%	47 -20%	72 22%	87 47%
WiFi v1.3	427	243 -43%	261 -39%	232 -46%	197 -54%	220 -48%
H.264	312					235 -25%

Pro

+ robusto case in alluminio

+ sottile e carino

+ schermo matto IPS

+ risoluzione Full HD

+ veloce SSD

+ HDMI 2.0

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ autonomia molto buona

+ nessun PWM flickering

Contro

- ventole sempre in funzione

- etichette della tastiera da migliorare

- manca una Ethernet

In review: Razer Blade (2016) FHD. Test model courtesy of Razer Germany.

Razer mette molte prestazioni in un case molto sottile ed attraente. Il sistema riesce a gestire tutti i giochi moderni, ma i frame rates sono leggermente inferiori rispetto ai concorrenti più grandi. Le prestazioni di raffreddamento sono limitate a causa dello chassis piccolo, quindi il clock GPU soffre un po'. Non è mai completamente silenzioso - e non ce l'aspettavamo. Potete tuttavia convivere con la rumorosità. Un SSD estremamente veloce garantisce un sistema reattivo. Non è un problema rimuovere il pannello inferiore, ed il dispositivo è pronto anche al futuro con le sue porte. Manca solo una porta Gigabit-Ethernet, che se necessario si ottiene con un adattatore.

Il Full HD Blade è il miglior pacchetto completo.

La principale differenza con il modello precedentemente recensito del Blade è il display. Lo schermo con ampi angoli di visuale IPS Full HD ha una buona luminosità ed un adeguato valore di contrasto. Positivo: rispetto al display QHD+ del gemello, non notiamo alcun PWM flickering sul display Full HD. Quest'ultimo è anche più efficiente rispetto al touchscreen QHD+ e consente di avere una maggiore autonomia della batteria.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Razer Blade (2016) FHD - 2016-12-2512/25/2016 v6
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

93 / 98 → 95%

Tastiera

76%

Dispositivo di puntamento

89%

Connettività

61 / 81 → 75%

Peso

64 / 66 → 97%

Batteria

85%

Display

87%

Prestazioni di gioco

91%

Prestazioni Applicazioni

92%

Temperatura

82 / 95 → 86%

Rumorosità

58 / 90 → 64%

Audio

66%

Fotocamera

71 / 85 → 84%

Media

78%

84%

Gaming - Media ponderata

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in confronto
Toshiba Satellite W30Dt-A-100 (min) A4-1200, Radeon HD 8180	33
...
Razer Blade 14 2015 4720HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	678
MSI Prestige PE70 6QE-055XUS 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M	678
Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	678
Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	678
HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	679
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M	679
Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M	679
...
(max) E5-2680 v4, Titan X Pascal	1657

PCMark 7 in confronto
Nokia Booklet 3G (min) Z530, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500	457
...
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP 7500U, HD Graphics 620	5857
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M	5861
MSI GE62-2QFUi716H11 4720HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	5866
Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	5874
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-591G-77A9 4710HQ, GeForce GTX 860M	5879
HP Envy 17-n107ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M	5880
Asus GL550JK-CN391H 4700HQ, GeForce GTX 850M	5891
...
Asus GX800 Prototype (max) 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)	8047

3DMark 11 in confronto
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Gigabyte P35X v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M	11433
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M	11488
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	11575
Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	11616
Aorus X5 5700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M SLI	11638
Gigabyte P55W v7 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	11778
Gigabyte Aero 14 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	11868
...
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI (max) 7920HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop)	25018

Recensione breve del Portatile Razer Blade (2016) FHD

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Tempi di risposta del Display

Razer Blade (2016) FHD audio analysis

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

Pro

Contro

Pricecompare