Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Leagoo Kiicaa Mix

Allen Ngo (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 11/06/2017

Economico e compatto. Il Kiicaa Mix costa meno di $150 USD ma non gestisce le bande 4G LTE necessarie per la maggioranza di utenti negli USA.

mediocre (71%) Leagoo Kiicaa Mix Mediatek MT6750ARM Mali-T860 MP2 Smartphone - 11/05/2017 - v6
Dispositivo di test fornito da Leagoo
(download rating image as PNG or SVG)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
Processore
Mediatek MT6750
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoria
3072 MB 
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 401 PPI, 10-point capacitive, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Lettore schede: MicroSD, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensori: Accelerometro, magnetometro
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz WCDMA: 850/900/2100MHz FDD-LTE: 800/850/900/1800/2100/2600MHz (Band 1,3,5,7,8,20) TDD-LTE: B40, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.9 x 141 x 75.8
Batteria
3000 mAh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix
Fotocamera Secondaria: 13 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
SIM key, cuffie, garanzia, guida rapida, caricatore USB Type-C, adattatore AC europeo, 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
153 gr
Prezzo
120 USD

 

Top: No ports
Top: No ports
Right: Power button, Volume rocker
Right: Power button, Volume rocker
Bottom: USB Type-C
Bottom: USB Type-C
Left: Nano-SIM and MicroSD slot
Left: Nano-SIM and MicroSD slot
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
503 MBit/s ∼100% +1245%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
251 MBit/s ∼50% +571%
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
802.11 b/g/n
37.4 MBit/s ∼7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
653 MBit/s ∼100% +1348%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
280 MBit/s ∼43% +521%
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
802.11 b/g/n
45.1 MBit/s ∼7%
451.3
cd/m²
439.7
cd/m²
424.1
cd/m²
466.2
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
465.5
cd/m²
441.5
cd/m²
430.5
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Massima: 466.2 cd/m² Media: 443.6 cd/m² Minimum: 23.25 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 91 %
Al centro con la batteria: 441 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1002:1 (Nero: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.36
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
IPS, 5.5, 1920x1080
Huawei Y7
IPS, 5.5, 1280x720
Gretel GT6000
IPS, 5.5, 1280x720
Doogee Mix
AMOLED, 5.5, 1280x720
Nokia 6
IPS, 5.5, 1920x1080
LG X power2
IPS, 5.5, 1280x720
Response Times
-25%
11%
82%
-41%
-64%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34.4 (18.8, 15.6)
59.2 (30, 29.2)
-72%
33.6 (12.4, 21.2)
2%
5.6 (2.8, 2.8)
84%
48 (25, 23)
-40%
55.2 (26.4, 28.8)
-60%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (13.2, 10.8)
18.4 (3.6, 14.8)
23%
19.2 (6, 13.2)
20%
4.8 (2.8, 2)
80%
34 (19, 15)
-42%
40 (24.4, 15.6)
-67%
PWM Frequency
2315 (14)
62.5
Screen
10%
17%
-5%
-5%
8%
Brightness
444
456
3%
644
45%
354
-20%
501
13%
237
-47%
Brightness Distribution
91
92
1%
92
1%
90
-1%
94
3%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.44
0.39
11%
0.36
18%
0.36
18%
0.13
70%
Contrast
1002
1197
19%
1858
85%
1422
42%
1823
82%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.1
4.3
-5%
4.4
-7%
4.9
-20%
6.4
-56%
5.5
-34%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.9
3.5
29%
6.9
-41%
3.9
20%
7.2
-47%
6.1
-24%
Gamma
2.36 102%
2.35 102%
2.34 103%
2.33 103%
2.28 105%
2.07 116%
CCT
7549 86%
7273 89%
6675 97%
7260 90%
7904 82%
7943 82%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-8% / 1%
14% / 15%
39% / 24%
-23% / -14%
-28% / -10%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms Incremento
↘ 10.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms Incremento
↘ 15.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected100 % brightness setting

In comparison: 55 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8587 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
41507 Points ∼18%
Huawei Y7
43303 Points ∼19% +4%
Gretel GT6000
24718 Points ∼11% -40%
Doogee Mix
60164 Points ∼26% +45%
Nokia 6
47066 Points ∼21% +13%
LG X power2
38547 Points ∼17% -7%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
24799 Points ∼11% -40%
HTC Desire 530
23561 Points ∼10% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
34451 Points ∼15% -17%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼78% +327%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
3118 Points ∼30%
Huawei Y7
3928 Points ∼38% +26%
Gretel GT6000
2527 Points ∼25% -19%
Doogee Mix
4908 Points ∼48% +57%
Nokia 6
3723 Points ∼36% +19%
LG X power2
3191 Points ∼31% +2%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% +111%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
5365 Points ∼63%
Gretel GT6000
3207 Points ∼38%
Doogee Mix
6127 Points ∼72%
Nokia 6
4980 Points ∼58%
LG X power2
4157 Points ∼49%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3701 Points ∼43%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2383 Points ∼28%
HTC Desire 530
2922 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
3570 Points ∼42%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼92%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
664 Points ∼39%
Huawei Y7
606 Points ∼36% -9%
Gretel GT6000
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Doogee Mix
813 Points ∼48% +22%
Nokia 6
10 Points ∼1% -98%
LG X power2
601 Points ∼35% -9%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
484 Points ∼29% -27%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
573 Points ∼34% -14%
HTC Desire 530
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
1073 Points ∼63% +62%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼76% +94%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
638 Points ∼7%
Huawei Y7
768 Points ∼8% +20%
Gretel GT6000
209 Points ∼2% -67%
Doogee Mix
1115 Points ∼12% +75%
Nokia 6
731 Points ∼8% +15%
LG X power2
489 Points ∼5% -23%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
315 Points ∼3% -51%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
346 Points ∼4% -46%
HTC Desire 530
231 Points ∼2% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
817 Points ∼9% +28%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼66% +863%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
786 Points ∼18%
Huawei Y7
686 Points ∼16% -13%
Gretel GT6000
681 Points ∼15% -13%
Doogee Mix
1243 Points ∼28% +58%
Nokia 6
587 Points ∼13% -25%
LG X power2
693 Points ∼16% -12%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
394 Points ∼9% -50%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
421 Points ∼10% -46%
HTC Desire 530
300 Points ∼7% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
969 Points ∼22% +23%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +463%
System (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
1870 Points ∼18%
Huawei Y7
1790 Points ∼17% -4%
Gretel GT6000
1124 Points ∼11% -40%
Doogee Mix
3063 Points ∼30% +64%
Nokia 6
2135 Points ∼21% +14%
LG X power2
1758 Points ∼17% -6%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1166 Points ∼11% -38%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
858 Points ∼8% -54%
HTC Desire 530
742 Points ∼7% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
1184 Points ∼12% -37%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼57% +216%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
888 Points ∼23%
Huawei Y7
869 Points ∼23% -2%
Gretel GT6000
197 Points ∼5% -78%
Doogee Mix
1363 Points ∼36% +53%
Nokia 6
307 Points ∼8% -65%
LG X power2
773 Points ∼20% -13%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
515 Points ∼14% -42%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
517 Points ∼14% -42%
HTC Desire 530
149 Points ∼4% -83%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
1001 Points ∼26% +13%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼100% +327%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
1858 Points ∼22%
Huawei Y7
2235 Points ∼26% +20%
Gretel GT6000
1032 Points ∼12% -44%
Doogee Mix
2922 Points ∼34% +57%
LG X power2
1448 Points ∼17% -22%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼93% +331%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
2613 Points ∼10%
Huawei Y7
2866 Points ∼11% +10%
Gretel GT6000
1504 Points ∼6% -42%
Doogee Mix
3903 Points ∼15% +49%
Nokia 6
2844 Points ∼11% +9%
LG X power2
2297 Points ∼9% -12%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼27% +160%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
599 Points ∼10%
Huawei Y7
645 Points ∼11% +8%
Gretel GT6000
541 Points ∼9% -10%
Doogee Mix
840 Points ∼14% +40%
Nokia 6
667 Points ∼11% +11%
LG X power2
593 Points ∼10% -1%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +229%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
1226 Points ∼40%
Huawei Y7
1340 Points ∼44% +9%
Gretel GT6000
756 Points ∼25% -38%
Doogee Mix
1876 Points ∼61% +53%
Nokia 6
1225 Points ∼40% 0%
LG X power2
1074 Points ∼35% -12%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼98% +147%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
323 Points ∼6%
Huawei Y7
281 Points ∼5% -13%
Gretel GT6000
80 Points ∼1% -75%
Doogee Mix
649 Points ∼12% +101%
Nokia 6
243 Points ∼5% -25%
LG X power2
254 Points ∼5% -21%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% +1063%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
386 Points ∼10%
Huawei Y7
341 Points ∼9% -12%
Gretel GT6000
100 Points ∼3% -74%
Doogee Mix
759 Points ∼20% +97%
Nokia 6
296 Points ∼8% -23%
LG X power2
306 Points ∼8% -21%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼92% +824%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
1091 Points ∼35%
Huawei Y7
1360 Points ∼44% +25%
Gretel GT6000
735 Points ∼24% -33%
Doogee Mix
1912 Points ∼62% +75%
Nokia 6
1238 Points ∼40% +13%
LG X power2
1053 Points ∼34% -3%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
758 Points ∼25% -31%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
813 Points ∼26% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
990 Points ∼32% -9%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼98% +176%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
480 Points ∼6%
Huawei Y7
533 Points ∼7% +11%
Gretel GT6000
128 Points ∼2% -73%
Doogee Mix
938 Points ∼12% +95%
Nokia 6
495 Points ∼6% +3%
LG X power2
379 Points ∼5% -21%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
39 Points ∼1% -92%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
46 Points ∼1% -90%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
410 Points ∼5% -15%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼62% +893%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
548 Points ∼11%
Huawei Y7
616 Points ∼12% +12%
Gretel GT6000
157 Points ∼3% -71%
Doogee Mix
1058 Points ∼21% +93%
Nokia 6
571 Points ∼11% +4%
LG X power2
442 Points ∼9% -19%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
49 Points ∼1% -91%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
58 Points ∼1% -89%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
471 Points ∼9% -14%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼85% +670%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
10081 Points ∼14%
Huawei Y7
9345 Points ∼13% -7%
Gretel GT6000
8198 Points ∼11% -19%
Doogee Mix
16619 Points ∼23% +65%
Nokia 6
8973 Points ∼12% -11%
LG X power2
8213 Points ∼11% -19%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
10148 Points ∼14% +1%
HTC Desire 530
6583 Points ∼9% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
8764 Points ∼12% -13%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼27% +93%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
10296 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y7
10152 Points ∼2% -1%
Gretel GT6000
3234 Points ∼1% -69%
Doogee Mix
14288 Points ∼3% +39%
Nokia 6
9605 Points ∼2% -7%
LG X power2
8140 Points ∼2% -21%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3789 Points ∼1% -63%
HTC Desire 530
3871 Points ∼1% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
9272 Points ∼2% -10%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼13% +463%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
10247 Points ∼5%
Huawei Y7
9961 Points ∼5% -3%
Gretel GT6000
3737 Points ∼2% -64%
Doogee Mix
14748 Points ∼7% +44%
Nokia 6
9457 Points ∼5% -8%
LG X power2
8156 Points ∼4% -20%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
4402 Points ∼2% -57%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
4675 Points ∼2% -54%
HTC Desire 530
4261 Points ∼2% -58%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
9154 Points ∼5% -11%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼20% +293%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
17 fps ∼1%
Gretel GT6000
5.9 fps ∼0%
Doogee Mix
24 fps ∼2%
Nokia 6
16 fps ∼1%
LG X power2
13 fps ∼1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.3 fps ∼0%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
5.7 fps ∼0%
HTC Desire 530
4.8 fps ∼0%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼8%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
24 fps ∼5%
Gretel GT6000
10 fps ∼2%
Doogee Mix
35 fps ∼8%
Nokia 6
16 fps ∼3%
LG X power2
22 fps ∼5%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9.5 fps ∼2%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
10 fps ∼2%
HTC Desire 530
8.9 fps ∼2%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼13%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
7.5 fps ∼1%
Gretel GT6000
2.2 fps ∼0%
Doogee Mix
11 fps ∼2%
Nokia 6
7.1 fps ∼1%
LG X power2
5.3 fps ∼1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1.7 fps ∼0%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2 fps ∼0%
HTC Desire 530
1.7 fps ∼0%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
16 fps ∼4%
Gretel GT6000
4.5 fps ∼1%
Doogee Mix
22 fps ∼6%
Nokia 6
7 fps ∼2%
LG X power2
11 fps ∼3%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3.7 fps ∼1%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
4.2 fps ∼1%
HTC Desire 530
4 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
2.3 fps ∼1%
Gretel GT6000
1.4 fps ∼0%
Doogee Mix
6.8 fps ∼2%
Nokia 6
4.6 fps ∼1%
LG X power2
3.5 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼10%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
12 fps ∼7%
Gretel GT6000
3.2 fps ∼2%
Doogee Mix
16 fps ∼9%
Nokia 6
4.5 fps ∼3%
LG X power2
8.6 fps ∼5%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼23%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
2.4 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y7
2.7 fps ∼1% +13%
Gretel GT6000
1.8 fps ∼1% -25%
Doogee Mix
4.1 fps ∼1% +71%
Nokia 6
2.5 fps ∼1% +4%
LG X power2
1.9 fps ∼1% -21%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼7% +942%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
2.4 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y7
5.9 fps ∼0% +146%
Gretel GT6000
4 fps ∼0% +67%
Doogee Mix
8.3 fps ∼0% +246%
Nokia 6
2.5 fps ∼0% +4%
LG X power2
4.3 fps ∼0% +79%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼1% +942%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
3.15 fps ∼8%
Doogee Mix
5.4 fps ∼14% +71%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
0.74 fps ∼2% -77%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
2.7 fps ∼7% -14%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
6378 Points ∼14%
Doogee Mix
10216 Points ∼23% +60%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1839 Points ∼4% -71%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
5113 Points ∼12% -20%
Medium Quality (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
14306 Points ∼32%
Doogee Mix
20373 Points ∼45% +42%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3855 Points ∼9% -73%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
10856 Points ∼24% -24%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
216 Points ∼12%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (ordina per valore)
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
39.8 fps ∼65%
Doogee Mix
61.6 fps ∼100% +55%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
31.9 fps ∼52% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 3
59 fps ∼96% +48%

Legenda

 
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gretel GT6000 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Doogee Mix Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X power2 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼100% +292%
Doogee Mix (Chrome 60)
24.6 Points ∼34% +35%
Xiaomi Redmi 3 (Chrome 47)
22.879 Points ∼32% +25%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 (Chrome 44)
20.832 Points ∼29% +14%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
20.6 Points ∼29% +13%
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix (Chrome 61.03163.98)
18.284 Points ∼26%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Chrome 54)
18.22 Points ∼25% 0%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
17.558 Points ∼25% -4%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
16.743 Points ∼23% -8%
Gretel GT6000 (Chrome Version 51)
15.388 Points ∼21% -16%
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
12.1 Points ∼17% -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼100% +294%
Doogee Mix (Chrome 60)
4175 Points ∼35% +38%
Xiaomi Redmi 3 (Chrome 47)
3647 Points ∼31% +20%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 (Chrome 44)
3296 Points ∼28% +9%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
3209 Points ∼27% +6%
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix (Chrome 61.03163.98)
3030 Points ∼25%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
2899 Points ∼24% -4%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
2712 Points ∼23% -10%
Gretel GT6000 (Chrome Version 51)
2456 Points ∼21% -19%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Chrome 54)
2141 Points ∼18% -29%
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
1796 Points ∼15% -41%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Gretel GT6000 (Chrome Version 51)
30113.9 ms * ∼100% -140%
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
17470.6 ms * ∼58% -39%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
13762.8 ms * ∼46% -10%
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix (Chrome 61.03163.98)
12561.3 ms * ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi 3 (Chrome 47)
12194.1 ms * ∼40% +3%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Chrome 54)
12145 ms * ∼40% +3%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
12062.3 ms * ∼40% +4%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 (Chrome 44)
11843 ms * ∼39% +6%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
11007 ms * ∼37% +12%
Doogee Mix (Chrome 60)
10305.6 ms * ∼34% +18%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼9% +79%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼100% +133%
Doogee Mix (Chrome 60)
77 Points ∼48% +12%
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix (Chrome 61.03163.98)
69 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi 3 (Chrome 47)
65 Points ∼40% -6%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
60 Points ∼37% -13%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
55 Points ∼34% -20%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 (Chrome 44)
52 Points ∼32% -25%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Chrome 54)
51 Points ∼32% -26%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
44 Points ∼27% -36%
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
34 Points ∼21% -51%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Leagoo Kiicaa MixHuawei Y7Gretel GT6000Doogee MixNokia 6LG X power2OnePlus 5
AndroBench 3-5
-44%
-46%
8%
-22%
-37%
115%
Random Write 4KB
13.95
6.9
-51%
8.46
-39%
11.2
-20%
11.34
-19%
10.7
-23%
19.3
38%
Random Read 4KB
52.27
53.15
2%
19.4
-63%
66.5
27%
33.8
-35%
25.3
-52%
141
170%
Sequential Write 256KB
131.19
33.2
-75%
44.16
-66%
165
26%
77.06
-41%
41.7
-68%
201.5
54%
Sequential Read 256KB
251.21
119.4
-52%
214.97
-14%
249
-1%
273.06
9%
243.8
-3%
748
198%
Carico massimo
 38.2 °C35.2 °C36.4 °C 
 37.8 °C35.8 °C40.2 °C 
 36.8 °C35.4 °C36.2 °C 
Massima: 40.2 °C
Media: 36.9 °C
34.8 °C35.4 °C43 °C
34.6 °C35.8 °C39.6 °C
35 °C35.8 °C39 °C
Massima: 43 °C
Media: 37 °C
Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203836.42531.8353132.434.34033.733.15032.531.56330.532.1803030.610028.828.91252828.116027.627.620026.726.925025.928.631525.435.74002543.550024.350.463023.958.480023.564.2100023.569.312502373.4160022.769.8200022.768.4250022.669.8315022.568.5400022.468.8500022.472.6630022.567.9800022.361.51000022.363.51250022.354.51600022.440.1SPL35.180.9N2.444.8median 23Leagoo Kiicaa Mixmedian 61.5Delta1.514.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.36 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (37.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 3.4 / 1.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2 / 2.5 / 2.9 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 6.1 / 3.3 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei Y7
435, Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Gretel GT6000
MT6737, Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Doogee Mix
Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash, AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.5
Nokia 6
430, Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
LG X power2
MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Power Consumption
34%
8%
23%
20%
5%
Idle Minimum *
2
0.57
71%
0.96
52%
1.13
43%
0.63
68%
0.63
68%
Idle Average *
2.5
1.61
36%
1.8
28%
1.7
32%
1.75
30%
1.42
43%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
1.62
44%
1.89
35%
1.74
40%
1.87
36%
1.47
49%
Load Average *
6.1
3.09
49%
5.3
13%
2.78
54%
3.56
42%
5.89
3%
Load Maximum *
3.3
4.26
-29%
6.15
-86%
5.01
-52%
5.85
-77%
7.85
-138%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
13ore 51minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
4ore 19minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
2ore 59minuti
Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2,  Wh
Huawei Y7
435, Adreno 505, 15.2 Wh
Gretel GT6000
MT6737, Mali-T720,  Wh
Doogee Mix
Helio P25, Mali-T880 MP2, 12.77 Wh
Nokia 6
430, Adreno 505,  Wh
LG X power2
MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2, 17.1 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
144%
268%
121%
97%
207%
Reader / Idle
831
1914
130%
2327
180%
1695
104%
2720
227%
WiFi v1.3
259
716
176%
1201
364%
573
121%
670
159%
982
279%
Load
179
402
125%
643
259%
228
27%
384
115%

Pro

+ display 1080p w/ contrasto buono
+ lettore impronte affidabile
+ 4G (dove supportato)
+ leggero e piccolo
+ dual-SIM w/ MicroSD
+ economico

Contro

- autonomia breve, batteria fissa
- manca il supporto 3G/4G per la maggioranza di carriers USA
- fotocamera frontale collocata male
- mancano chiamate WiFi, NFC, IR, o 802.11ac
- casse scalse, qualità audio bassa
- prestazioni multi-tasking scarse
- chassis che scricchiola
- manca un jack audio da 3.5 mm
- qualità della fotocamera scarsa
Recensione: Leagoo Kiicaa Mix. Modello di test fornito da Leagoo
Recensione: Leagoo Kiicaa Mix. Modello di test fornito da Leagoo

Con basi più strette su tre lati ha benefici e dei punti deboli. Forse il principale vantaggio sono le dimensioni ridotte che rendono il Kiicaa Mix uno degli smartphones da 5.5" Android più leggero e piccolo, attualmente a disposizione. Di negativo la fotocamera frontale è stata posizionata male, non c'è il sensore di luminosità ambientale, l'auricolare è troppo morbido, e la digitazione in modalità panoramica è scarsa.

Oltre a qualche pecca, il resto dello smartphone è nella media, incluse le prestazioni del processore. Ci sono poche features aggiuntive e sia la fotocamera posteriore che l'autonomia sono sotto la media. Il display ed il lettore di impronte sono gli unici due aspetti che si fanno notare positivamente in un dispositivo così economico. Gli utenti USA devono considerare che Leagoo molto probabilmente non gestirà le bande 3G e 4G della maggioranza di operatori.

Coloro che vogliono risparmiare, ma vogliono un display decente, un lettore di impronte veloce, e dimensioni ridotte, saranno contenti di investire i loro ~$120 USD.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

 

 

Leagoo Kiicaa Mix - 11/05/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Chassis
59%
Tastiera
64 / 75 → 85%
Dispositivo di puntamento
72%
Connettività
22 / 60 → 36%
Peso
92%
Batteria
77%
Display
85%
Prestazioni di gioco
22 / 63 → 35%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatura
88%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
20 / 91 → 22%
Fotocamera
37%
Media
60%
71%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Leagoo Kiicaa Mix
Allen Ngo, 2017-11- 6 (Update: 2017-11- 7)