Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Gretel GT6000

Florian Schaar (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 09/26/2017

Pesante come un sasso. IL GT600 è il secondo smartphone di questo produttore Cinese che abbiamo recensito. COn il suo ottimo prezzo e la buona autonomia, questo pesante dispositivo è un'offerta attraente.

Gretel GT6000
Processore
Scheda grafica
Memoria
2048 MB 
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 267 PPI, 5 punti, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 12 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: cuffie, Lettore schede: microSD fino a 32 GB (SDHC), 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: prossimità, accelerometro
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz 3G: WCDMA 900/2100MHz 4G: FDD-LTE 800/900/1800/2100/2600MHz, Dual SIM, LTE
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 10.8 x 154 x 77.3
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix Dual camera 13 + 1.3 MP
Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix WebCam
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: 1, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Caricatore, cavo USB, case, GPS, senza ventola
Peso
233 gr, Alimentazione: 84 gr
Prezzo
94 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gretel GT6000
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.5 MBit/s ∼100%
Blackview P2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
78.7 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Blackview A9 Pro
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.9 MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.4 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
Blackview A8 Max
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
34.3 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Blackview P2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.5 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Gretel GT6000
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
94.9 MBit/s ∼96%
Blackview A8 Max
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.5 MBit/s ∼48% -50%
Blackview A9 Pro
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 MBit/s ∼48% -51%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.2 MBit/s ∼46% -52%
GPS reception outdoors
GPS reception outdoors
GPS reception outdoors
GPS reception outdoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
Main camera
Main camera
Front camera
Main camera, close-up shot
The white lacks detail
Front camera
656
cd/m²
674
cd/m²
638
cd/m²
641
cd/m²
669
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
631
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 674 cd/m² Media: 643.8 cd/m² Minimum: 26.56 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 92 %
Al centro con la batteria: 669 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1858:1 (Nero: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.34
Gretel GT6000
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Blackview P2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Blackview A9 Pro
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Blackview A8 Max
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Lenovo Moto C Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-27%
-4%
-56%
8%
Brightness
644
420
-35%
466
-28%
407
-37%
472
-27%
Brightness Distribution
92
85
-8%
91
-1%
86
-7%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.36
0.15
58%
0.35
3%
1.08
-200%
0.23
36%
Contrast
1858
2827
52%
1351
-27%
403
-78%
2139
15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
9.5
-116%
4.4
-0%
5.7
-30%
5.4
-23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.9
14.5
-110%
4.7
32%
5.9
14%
3.7
46%
Gamma
2.34 103%
2.28 105%
2.33 103%
2.18 110%
2.05 117%
CCT
6675 97%
10840 60%
7343 89%
8164 80%
7182 91%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6951 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
19.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms Incremento
↘ 13.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms Incremento
↘ 21.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
24718 Points ∼11%
Blackview P2
41852 Points ∼18% +69%
Blackview A9 Pro
28488 Points ∼12% +15%
Blackview A8 Max
30916 Points ∼14% +25%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
29911 Points ∼13% +21%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
2527 Points ∼37%
Blackview P2
2782 Points ∼41% +10%
Blackview A9 Pro
2608 Points ∼38% +3%
Blackview A8 Max
2474 Points ∼36% -2%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
2754 Points ∼40% +9%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
3207 Points ∼39%
Blackview P2
3667 Points ∼44% +14%
Blackview A9 Pro
3300 Points ∼40% +3%
Blackview A8 Max
3427 Points ∼41% +7%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
3308 Points ∼40% +3%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
9 Points ∼1%
Blackview P2
9 Points ∼1% 0%
Blackview A9 Pro
553 Points ∼36% +6044%
Blackview A8 Max
9 Points ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
632 Points ∼41% +6922%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
209 Points ∼2%
Blackview P2
620 Points ∼7% +197%
Blackview A9 Pro
213 Points ∼2% +2%
Blackview A8 Max
211 Points ∼2% +1%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
209 Points ∼2% 0%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
681 Points ∼15%
Blackview P2
831 Points ∼19% +22%
Blackview A9 Pro
685 Points ∼15% +1%
Blackview A8 Max
733 Points ∼17% +8%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
501 Points ∼11% -26%
System (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
1124 Points ∼17%
Blackview P2
1623 Points ∼25% +44%
Blackview A9 Pro
1101 Points ∼17% -2%
Blackview A8 Max
1125 Points ∼17% 0%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
1048 Points ∼16% -7%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
197 Points ∼5%
Blackview P2
298 Points ∼8% +51%
Blackview A9 Pro
546 Points ∼14% +177%
Blackview A8 Max
201 Points ∼5% +2%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
513 Points ∼14% +160%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
1032 Points ∼12%
Blackview P2
1633 Points ∼19% +58%
Blackview A9 Pro
1065 Points ∼13% +3%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
1504 Points ∼8%
Blackview P2
2463 Points ∼13% +64%
Blackview A9 Pro
1486 Points ∼8% -1%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
1526 Points ∼8% +1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
541 Points ∼11%
Blackview P2
620 Points ∼13% +15%
Blackview A9 Pro
562 Points ∼12% +4%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
532 Points ∼11% -2%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
756 Points ∼25%
Blackview P2
1055 Points ∼35% +40%
Blackview A9 Pro
747 Points ∼25% -1%
Blackview A8 Max
728 Points ∼24% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
80 Points ∼1%
Blackview P2
328 Points ∼6% +310%
Blackview A9 Pro
79 Points ∼1% -1%
Blackview A8 Max
82 Points ∼2% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
100 Points ∼3%
Blackview P2
387 Points ∼10% +287%
Blackview A9 Pro
99 Points ∼3% -1%
Blackview A8 Max
102 Points ∼3% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
735 Points ∼24%
Blackview P2
1030 Points ∼34% +40%
Blackview A9 Pro
750 Points ∼25% +2%
Blackview A8 Max
727 Points ∼24% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
128 Points ∼2%
Blackview P2
482 Points ∼6% +277%
Blackview A9 Pro
134 Points ∼2% +5%
Blackview A8 Max
129 Points ∼2% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
157 Points ∼3%
Blackview P2
546 Points ∼11% +248%
Blackview A9 Pro
164 Points ∼3% +4%
Blackview A8 Max
158 Points ∼3% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
8198 Points ∼11%
Blackview P2
9612 Points ∼13% +17%
Blackview A9 Pro
8528 Points ∼12% +4%
Blackview A8 Max
8646 Points ∼12% +5%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
7825 Points ∼11% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
3234 Points ∼1%
Blackview P2
9604 Points ∼2% +197%
Blackview A9 Pro
3199 Points ∼1% -1%
Blackview A8 Max
3284 Points ∼1% +2%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
3226 Points ∼1% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
3737 Points ∼2%
Blackview P2
9496 Points ∼5% +154%
Blackview A9 Pro
3715 Points ∼2% -1%
Blackview A8 Max
3809 Points ∼2% +2%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
3711 Points ∼2% -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
5.9 fps ∼0%
Blackview P2
16 fps ∼1% +171%
Blackview A9 Pro
6 fps ∼0% +2%
Blackview A8 Max
6 fps ∼0% +2%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
10 fps ∼1% +69%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
10 fps ∼2%
Blackview P2
16 fps ∼3% +60%
Blackview A9 Pro
9.9 fps ∼2% -1%
Blackview A8 Max
10 fps ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
6 fps ∼1% -40%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
2.2 fps ∼0%
Blackview P2
6.7 fps ∼1% +205%
Blackview A9 Pro
2.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Blackview A8 Max
2.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
4.5 fps ∼1% +105%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
4.5 fps ∼1%
Blackview P2
6.7 fps ∼2% +49%
Blackview A9 Pro
4.5 fps ∼1% 0%
Blackview A8 Max
4.5 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
2.2 fps ∼1% -51%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
1.4 fps ∼0%
Blackview P2
4.4 fps ∼1% +214%
Blackview A9 Pro
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Blackview A8 Max
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
3.2 fps ∼2%
Blackview P2
4.4 fps ∼3% +38%
Blackview A9 Pro
3.2 fps ∼2% 0%
Blackview A8 Max
3.2 fps ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
3.2 fps ∼2% 0%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
1.8 fps ∼1%
Blackview P2
2.3 fps ∼1% +28%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Gretel GT6000
4 fps ∼0%
Blackview P2
2.3 fps ∼0% -42%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (ordina per valore)
Blackview A8 Max
27 fps ∼44%

Legenda

 
Gretel GT6000 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview P2 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview A9 Pro Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview A8 Max Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto C Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58)
20.482 Points ∼100% +33%
Blackview A8 Max (Chrome Version 53)
17.188 Points ∼84% +12%
Gretel GT6000 (Chrome Version 51)
15.388 Points ∼75%
Blackview A9 Pro (Chrome Browser Version 59)
15.167 Points ∼74% -1%
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60)
14.602 Points ∼71% -5%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58)
2838 Points ∼100% +16%
Blackview A8 Max (Chrome Version 53)
2607 Points ∼92% +6%
Gretel GT6000 (Chrome Version 51)
2456 Points ∼87%
Blackview A9 Pro (Chrome Browser Version 59)
2311 Points ∼81% -6%
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60)
2247 Points ∼79% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Gretel GT6000 (Chrome Version 51)
30113.9 ms * ∼100%
Blackview A9 Pro (Chrome Browser Version 59)
18355.2 ms * ∼61% +39%
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60)
16237.6 ms * ∼54% +46%
Blackview A8 Max (Chrome Version 53)
13642.6 ms * ∼45% +55%
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58)
13174 ms * ∼44% +56%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Gretel GT6000Blackview P2Blackview A9 ProBlackview A8 MaxLenovo Moto C Plus
AndroBench 3-5
64%
2%
7%
5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
8.29 (Toshiba Exceria SD-CX32UHS1)
19.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
137%
16.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
99%
18.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
123%
10.7
29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
36.76 (Toshiba Exceria SD-CX32UHS1)
34.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
33.07 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
35.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-2%
13.5
-63%
Random Write 4KB
8.46
9.54
13%
7.1
-16%
5.65
-33%
15.4
82%
Random Read 4KB
19.4
22.07
14%
12.18
-37%
16.15
-17%
18.1
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
44.16
133.84
203%
37.63
-15%
47.25
7%
44.45
1%
Sequential Read 256KB
214.97
264.78
23%
189.58
-12%
141.83
-34%
186.69
-13%
Carico massimo
 40.6 °C34.2 °C33.5 °C 
 38.6 °C36.1 °C34.8 °C 
 37.2 °C36.1 °C33.7 °C 
Massima: 40.6 °C
Media: 36.1 °C
32.9 °C33.1 °C34.6 °C
32.9 °C33.3 °C34.4 °C
32.3 °C33.1 °C34.4 °C
Massima: 34.6 °C
Media: 33.4 °C
Alimentazione (max)  31.7 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.82525.434.83125.325.74032.924.95033.626.66331.631.68028.429.21002728.512520.824.91602222.820021.325.425020.833.431521.243.440019.452.550019.560.563017.767.480017.972.8100017.876.3125017.375.7160017.470.7200016.769.9250017.268.3315018.268.7400017.969.8500017.674.9630017.774.7800017.866.71000017.9611250018.154.41600018.256.4SPL3083.4N1.356.1median 17.9Gretel GT6000median 66.7Delta1.313.631.632.325.432.325.33932.932.333.637.531.646.328.440.92738.920.829.12228.721.325.620.828.521.240.519.448.519.554.317.758.917.966.917.869.617.368.617.47116.772.117.27418.277.317.980.917.672.917.760.317.859.217.957.818.158.418.256.23084.41.353.6median 17.9Blackview A9 Promedian 58.91.315hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Gretel GT6000 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Blackview A9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.41 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.96 / 1.8 / 1.89 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 5.3 / 6.15 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gretel GT6000
6000 mAh
Blackview P2
6000 mAh
Blackview A9 Pro
3000 mAh
Blackview A8 Max
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto C Plus
4000 mAh
Power Consumption
1%
-21%
6%
23%
Idle Minimum *
0.96
0.99
-3%
1.06
-10%
0.74
23%
0.8
17%
Idle Average *
1.8
2.04
-13%
2.31
-28%
1.97
-9%
1.87
-4%
Idle Maximum *
1.89
2.12
-12%
2.43
-29%
2.09
-11%
1.89
-0%
Load Average *
5.3
3.77
29%
6.51
-23%
4.89
8%
2.18
59%
Load Maximum *
6.15
5.78
6%
6.96
-13%
5.09
17%
3.61
41%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
38ore 47minuti
Navigazione WiFi
0ore 00minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
20ore 01minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
10ore 43minuti
Gretel GT6000
6000 mAh
Blackview P2
6000 mAh
Blackview A9 Pro
3000 mAh
Blackview A8 Max
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto C Plus
4000 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
-13%
-48%
-58%
-29%
Reader / Idle
2327
1957
-16%
1157
-50%
WiFi v1.3
1201
1083
-10%
711
-41%
506
-58%
858
-29%
Load
643
563
-12%
293
-54%

Pro

+ buona qualità di costruzione
+ display molto luminoso
+ fotocamera ad alta risoluzione
+ ampia autonomia
+ buon rapporto prezzo-performance
+ decente qualità voce
+ stabile
+ marchio CE
+ lettore impronte
+ buona riproduzione del colore e stabilità degli angoli di visuale
+ resta fresco

Contro

- protuberanza sul case
- effetto pixelation nelle foto
- processore e scheda grafica deboli
- pesante
- GPS molto impreciso
- copertura garanzia non chiara
Recensione: Gretel GT6000. Dispositivo di test fornito da Gretel.
Recensione: Gretel GT6000. Dispositivo di test fornito da Gretel.

Il Gretel non è una meraviglia di tecnologia o velocità. Ma non  ci sono motivi per prenderlo in giro. Quasi tutti i componenti fisici offrono buone qualità considerando il prezzo. Il dispositivo si comporta bene in tutte le discipline. La fotocamera scatta buone foto quando c'è luce. I problemi ci sono con contrasti elevati, e lo strano effetto pixel. Nonostante il GPS impreciso, dovrebbe essere possibile trovare la strada e casa dei suoceri. Anche senza sassolini.

Solido dispositivo entry-level con fotocamera accettabile e buona autonomia.

Una highlight è il display molto luminoso. Non ci sono grosse critiche, le nostre sono limitate. 

Questo smartphone è adatto a coloro che vogliono autonomia, ma non vogliono spendere molto. Se il peso nn è un problema, per meno di 100 Euros (~$120), questo dispositivo è raccomandabile.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Gretel GT6000 - 09/15/2017 v6
Florian Schaar

Chassis
81%
Tastiera
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositivo di puntamento
87%
Connettività
38 / 60 → 63%
Peso
88%
Batteria
100%
Display
85%
Prestazioni di gioco
8 / 63 → 12%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
27 / 70 → 38%
Temperatura
90%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Fotocamera
50%
Media
67%
78%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Gretel GT6000
Florian Schaar, 2017-09-26 (Update: 2017-09-26)