Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N (i5-7200U, FHD)

Ultrabook da 13" più leggero e luminoso. La serie Notebook 9 continua ad impressionare con un altro peso piuma per $1000 USD. Questo 13" non ha features chiave rispetto ad alternative più diffuse, ma di alcune di queste si può fare tranquillamente a meno nell'utilizzo quotidiano.

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US (Notebook 9 Serie)
Processore
Intel Core i5-7200U
Scheda grafica
Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 300 MHz, Memoria: 1067 MHz, DDR4, 21.20.16.4541
Memoria
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 1066.7 MHz, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Schermo
13.3 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, lucido: si
Scheda madre
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Harddisk
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, 256 GB 
Scheda audio
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Porte di connessione
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, Connessioni Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Lettore schede: lettore MicroSD, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità
Rete
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 14 x 309 x 208
Batteria
30 Wh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: 1.5 W stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, guida rapida, Samsung Software Suite, Samsung PC Cleaner, 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
817 gr, Alimentazione: 114 gr
Prezzo
1000 USD
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

327 mm 228 mm 14.6 mm 1.3 kg323 mm 224.5 mm 14.3 mm 1.4 kg325 mm 229 mm 10.4 mm 1.1 kg309 mm 208 mm 14 mm 817 g304 mm 201 mm 15 mm 1.2 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 14.9 mm 1.4 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
 
107.8 MB/s ∼100% +60%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
 
68.72 MB/s ∼64% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
 
67.37 MB/s ∼62%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
 
250.6 MB/s ∼100% +185%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
 
88.07 MB/s ∼35%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
 
86.49 MB/s ∼35% -2%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
668 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
485 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
663 MBit/s ∼100% +28%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼87% +11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
517 MBit/s ∼78%
472
cd/m²
507.9
cd/m²
488.3
cd/m²
469.7
cd/m²
510.7
cd/m²
463.4
cd/m²
457.3
cd/m²
498.4
cd/m²
458.5
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Massima: 510.7 cd/m² Media: 480.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.17 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 90 %
Al centro con la batteria: 510.7 cd/m²
Contrasto: 774:1 (Nero: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
88.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
CMN1374, IPS UWVA, 13.3, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
APPA033, IPS, 13.3, 2560x1600
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
AU Optronics AUO323D / B139HAN03.2, IPS, 13.9, 3840x2160
Response Times
-4%
12%
6%
9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.6 (22.8, 18.8)
46 (26, 20)
-11%
32.8 (16, 16.8)
21%
42.8 (22.4, 20.4)
-3%
46 (14, 32)
-11%
Response Time Black / White *
34 (20, 14)
33 (21, 12)
3%
33.2 (10.8, 22.4)
2%
28.8 (14.8, 14)
15%
24 (6, 18)
29%
PWM Frequency
210.1 (99)
Screen
-26%
-30%
29%
-49%
Brightness middle
510.7
404
-21%
351.2
-31%
588
15%
348
-32%
Brightness
481
382
-21%
325
-32%
561
17%
310
-36%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
89
-1%
92
2%
80
-11%
Black Level *
0.66
0.35
47%
0.195
70%
0.45
32%
0.25
62%
Contrast
774
1154
49%
1801
133%
1307
69%
1392
80%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
5.37
-124%
7.4
-208%
1.7
29%
7.86
-228%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.3
9.46
-30%
9.08
-24%
3.5
52%
13.43
-84%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
6.44
-168%
6.71
-180%
1.9
21%
8.25
-244%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.52 87%
2.74 80%
2.33 94%
2.05 107%
CCT
6747 96%
6738 96%
7222 90%
6738 96%
6834 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
58
2%
50.48
-11%
77.92
37%
58
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88.1
89
1%
73.31
-17%
99.94
13%
90
2%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-15% / -23%
-9% / -23%
18% / 25%
-20% / -39%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
34 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 20 ms Incremento
↘ 14 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 88 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25.1 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
41.6 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 22.8 ms Incremento
↘ 18.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 54 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (40 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 210.1 Hz ≤ 99 % settaggio luminosita'

Il display sfarfalla a 210.1 Hz (Probabilmente a causa dell'uso di PWM) Flickering rilevato ad una luminosita' di 99 % o inferiore. Non dovrebbe verificarsi flickering o PWM sopra questo valore di luminosita'.

La frequenza di 210.1 Hz è relativamente bassa, quindi gli utenti sensibili potrebbero notare il flickering ed accusare stanchezza agli occhi a questo livello di luminosità e a livelli inferiori.

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9418 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
141 Points ∼65% +15%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
139 Points ∼64% +13%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
133 Points ∼61% +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
131 Points ∼60% +7%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points ∼60% +6%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
125 Points ∼57% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
123 Points ∼56%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
113 Points ∼52% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70
Intel Core i5-4200U
98 Points ∼45% -20%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
91 Points ∼42% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
503 Points ∼11% +53%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
383 (min: 377, max: 385) Points ∼9% +17%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
343 Points ∼8% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
339 Points ∼8% +3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼7%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
327 Points ∼7% 0%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
314 Points ∼7% -4%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
284 Points ∼6% -13%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
257 Points ∼6% -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70
Intel Core i5-4200U
230 Points ∼5% -30%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.64 Points ∼67% +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
1.54 Points ∼63% +6%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.51 Points ∼62% +4%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.48 Points ∼61% +2%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.45 Points ∼59% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.45 Points ∼59%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.28 Points ∼52% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70
Intel Core i5-4200U
1.12 Points ∼46% -23%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
1.03 Points ∼42% -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.81 Points ∼17% +58%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
4.09 Points ∼12% +11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.83 Points ∼11% +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points ∼11%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.63 Points ∼11% -1%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.16 Points ∼9% -14%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.15 Points ∼9% -14%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.83 Points ∼8% -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70
Intel Core i5-4200U
2.5 Points ∼7% -32%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
5630 Points ∼52% +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
5010 Points ∼46% +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
4975 Points ∼46%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
4943 Points ∼46% -1%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
4920 Points ∼45% -1%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
4904 Points ∼45% -1%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
4368 Points ∼40% -12%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
4168 Points ∼38% -16%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17618 Points ∼35% +55%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
11676 Points ∼23% +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
11403 Points ∼23% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
11373 Points ∼23%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
10906 Points ∼22% -4%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
10897 Points ∼22% -4%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
9723 Points ∼20% -15%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
6550 Points ∼13% -42%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
567.765 s * ∼7% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
492 s * ∼6% -1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
489.402 s * ∼6%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
477.55 s * ∼6% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
456.763 s * ∼5% +7%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
818.369 Seconds * ∼4% -30%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
668.607 Seconds * ∼3% -7%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
627.687 Seconds * ∼3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
626 Seconds * ∼3% -0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
563.28 Seconds * ∼3% +10%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8772
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11373
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4975
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.67 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
36.64 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.45 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
123 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
46.26 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
328 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5053 Points ∼78% +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4928 Points ∼76% +3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
4786 Points ∼73%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4568 Points ∼70% -5%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4769 Points ∼50% +4%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4655 Points ∼49% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
4577 Points ∼48%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4211 Points ∼44% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3852 Points ∼63% +3%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3789 Points ∼62% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
3728 Points ∼61%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3535 Points ∼58% -5%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3728 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4577 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4786 punti
Aiuto
AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM5
CDM5
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 8 Storage
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
AS SSD
155%
33%
71%
-12%
Copy Game MB/s
186.76
397.86
113%
390.03
109%
189.36
1%
Copy Program MB/s
213.04
426.04
100%
188.02
-12%
204.3
-4%
Copy ISO MB/s
335.88
719.82
114%
283.3
-16%
293.55
-13%
Score Total
1057
3617
242%
1607
52%
1865
76%
1056
0%
Score Write
350
1115
219%
327
-7%
611
75%
374
7%
Score Read
463
1654
257%
870
88%
850
84%
448
-3%
Access Time Write *
0.053
0.026
51%
0.035
34%
0.028
47%
0.11
-108%
Access Time Read *
0.066
0.042
36%
0.055
17%
0.034
48%
0.076
-15%
4K-64 Write
223.84
861.58
285%
197.7
-12%
422.18
89%
271.37
21%
4K-64 Read
379.44
1464.77
286%
722.85
91%
671.28
77%
370.29
-2%
4K Write
79.23
134.4
70%
91.98
16%
132.91
68%
56.79
-28%
4K Read
31.24
56.36
80%
29.52
-6%
39.92
28%
25.89
-17%
Seq Write
466.02
1189.63
155%
372.76
-20%
559.7
20%
463.4
-1%
Seq Read
519.84
1324.96
155%
1179.3
127%
1388.73
167%
514.18
-1%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 551.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 512.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 273.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 99.16 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 489.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 458.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 34.45 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 105.4 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2193 (min: 2057, max: 2200) Points ∼10% +48%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1770 Points ∼8% +20%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1609 Points ∼7% +9%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1483 Points ∼7% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1478 Points ∼7%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1413 Points ∼6% -4%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1401 Points ∼6% -5%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
979 Points ∼4% -34%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U
616 Points ∼3% -58%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2379 (min: 2355, max: 2425) Points ∼5% +55%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2230 Points ∼4% +45%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1623 Points ∼3% +6%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1562 Points ∼3% +2%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1545 Points ∼3% +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1536 Points ∼3%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1343 Points ∼3% -13%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
1082 Points ∼2% -30%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U
703 Points ∼1% -54%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1593 Points ∼4% +65%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
1541 (min: 1484, max: 1547) Points ∼4% +59%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1045 Points ∼3% +8%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
967 Points ∼2%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
963 Points ∼2% 0%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
948 Points ∼2% -2%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
786 Points ∼2% -19%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
657 Points ∼2% -32%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U
544 Points ∼1% -44%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
11495 (min: 10969, max: 11750) Points ∼6% +38%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
9060 Points ∼5% +9%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
8385 Points ∼5% +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
8301 Points ∼4%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
8177 Points ∼4% -1%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
8104 Points ∼4% -2%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
6924 Points ∼4% -17%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
5415 Points ∼3% -35%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U
4620 Points ∼3% -44%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
49119 Points ∼7% +5%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
47546 Points ∼7% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
46817 Points ∼6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
42314 Points ∼6% -10%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
37343 Points ∼5% -20%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
31550 Points ∼4% -33%
3DMark 11 Performance
1695 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
64405 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6418 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
892 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
411 punti
Aiuto
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 42.62624.77.6fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 20fps
CPU Clock (GHz) GPU Clock (MHz) Average CPU Temperature (°C)
Prime95 Stress 2.3 - 3.0 -- 78 - 95
FurMark Stress -- 500 - 900 72 - 85
Prime95 + FurMark Stress 0.9 - 1.4 500 - 900 71 - 84

Emissions

Samsung NP900X3N (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark06, Green: Prime95+FurMark)
Samsung NP900X3N (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark06, Green: Prime95+FurMark)
HP Spectre x360 13
HP Spectre x360 13
MSI GS43VR
MSI GS43VR

Rumorosità

Idle
28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A)
Sotto carico
33.2 / 35.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 28.4 dB(A)
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U, Apple SSD AP0128
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
Noise
-10%
1%
-11%
-6%
-10%
off /ambiente *
28.4
30.4
-7%
31.7
-12%
30.2
-6%
30.7
-8%
Idle Minimum *
28.4
30.4
-7%
28.9
-2%
31.7
-12%
30.2
-6%
30.7
-8%
Idle Average *
28.4
30.4
-7%
28.9
-2%
31.7
-12%
30.2
-6%
30.7
-8%
Idle Maximum *
28.4
30.4
-7%
28.9
-2%
31.7
-12%
30.2
-6%
30.9
-9%
Load Average *
33.2
40
-20%
30.9
7%
38.4
-16%
32.9
1%
38.7
-17%
Load Maximum *
35.2
40
-14%
33.5
5%
34.7
1%
39.3
-12%
38.9
-11%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 36.8 °C39.8 °C28.6 °C 
 33.8 °C36.2 °C25.8 °C 
 25 °C25.2 °C24.4 °C 
Massima: 39.8 °C
Media: 30.6 °C
32.6 °C38.8 °C36.2 °C
29.4 °C33.8 °C33 °C
28.2 °C29.8 °C30.2 °C
Massima: 38.8 °C
Media: 32.4 °C
Alimentazione (max)  35.4 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 30.6 °C / 87 F, rispetto alla media di 30.7 °C / 87 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Subnotebook.
(+) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 39.8 °C / 104 F, rispetto alla media di 35.8 °C / 96 F, che varia da 22 a 57 °C per questa classe Subnotebook.
(+) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 38.8 °C / 102 F, rispetto alla media di 40.1 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 24.2 °C / 76 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (+3.4 °C / 6.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.3412532.8363133.934.64032.134.45032.832.96330.133.38031.932.510030.229.912529.12916028.228.820027.332.225026.54231525.648.740025.450.35002551.763024.5478002455.2100023.959.4125023.456.7160023.256200023.550.4250023.254.9315022.956.240002356.9500023.157.1630023.161.980002358.41000023.153.91250023.258.71600023.354.5SPL35.768.8N2.524median 23.5median 54.5Delta1.86.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01USApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US analisi audio

(-) | not very loud speakers (61.9 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Frequency Comparison (Checkbox selectable!)
Graph 1: Pink Noise 100% Vol.; Graph 2: Audio off

Energy Management

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.21 / 0.55 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.8 / 11 / 11.3 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 35.6 / 37.2 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T
7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Power Consumption
16%
34%
16%
7%
23%
Idle Minimum *
3.8
3.6
5%
4.1
-8%
4.3
-13%
3.7
3%
3.3
13%
Idle Average *
11
6.4
42%
4.2
62%
6.3
43%
5.2
53%
6.2
44%
Idle Maximum *
11.3
9.2
19%
5.1
55%
9
20%
7.6
33%
10.4
8%
Load Average *
35.6
34
4%
22.1
38%
32.7
8%
41.6
-17%
28
21%
Load Maximum *
37.2
34.4
8%
29.4
21%
28.8
23%
50.5
-36%
25.7
31%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
11ore 35minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4ore 39minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
1ore 00minuti
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
24%
130%
125%
87%
46%
Reader / Idle
695
718
3%
1295
86%
1069
54%
844
21%
WiFi v1.3
279
394
41%
677
143%
644
131%
681
144%
397
42%
Load
60
77
28%
157
162%
174
190%
78
30%
105
75%

Pro

+ temperature di superficie relativamente basse sotto carico
+ il display da Ultrabook più luminoso per la sua dimensione
+ accesso all'interno; SSD sostituibile
+ buon feedback di tastiera e trackpad
+ Ultrabook più leggero della sua classe
+ porta full-size USB ed HDMI
+ ricarica via USB Type-C
+ lettore impronte
+ ventola silenziosa

Contro

- nessuna opzione QHD, 4K UHD, touchscreen, NVMe, o SIM
- batteria piccola; autonomia sotto la media
- Clock rates CPU e GPU sotto carico
- PWM quasi sempre
- temperature elevate sotto carico
- base e cover non molto rigide
- Lettore SD non full-size e nessuna Thunderbolt 3
- casse scarse
- design dello chassis
- nessuna opzione di schermo matto

Giudizio Complessivo

Recensione: Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Recensione: Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US

IL 13" Notebook 9 era stato creato con uno scopo in mente - essere l'Ultrabook più leggero e luminoso della sua classe. Samsung con l'NP900X3N ha fatto ancora di meglio. Unendo ventola silenziosa, porte full-size USB, e tastiera decente, rendendo questo ultrabook da 13" il migliore dispositivo da viaggio e per ambienti aperti.

La determinazione Samsung a realizzare l'Ultrabook più leggero ha comportato dei sacrifici. Per tenere basso il peso, manca un touchscreen e le opzioni Gorilla Glass inoltre sistema di raffreddamento e capacità della batteria sono limitati. Quest'ultima comporta una autonomia sotto la media per in portatile che per il resto è eccellente da usare quando siete in giro. La rigidità dello chassis, non è male, ma nemmeno al livello di XPS 13 o MacBook Pro 13.

Speriamo che future revisioni aggiungeranno Thunderbolt 3, compatibilità SIM, e pannello matto come opzione in modo da rendere ancora migliore come compagni di viaggio il Notebook 9. Sino ad allora, coloro che vogliono qualcosa più di leggero e luminoso rispetto all'XPS 13 senza sacrificare USB full-size o porte HDMI come su Zenbook 3, Matebook X, Yoga 910, o Spectre 13 non saranno delusi da questo Samsung.

Il display extra luminoso e la leggerezza rendono questo 13" Notebook 9 un ottimo acquisto per chi è sempre in giro. Se l'autonomia e le possibilità docking Thunderbolt 3 sono più importanti, tuttavia, ci sono molte opzioni migliori.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

 

 

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US - 08/29/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Chassis
78 /  98 → 79%
Tastiera
85%
Dispositivo di puntamento
86%
Connettività
46 / 80 → 58%
Peso
78 / 35-78 → 100%
Batteria
79%
Display
86%
Prestazioni di gioco
57 / 68 → 83%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
87 / 87 → 99%
Temperatura
94 / 91 → 100%
Rumorosità
97%
Audio
40 / 91 → 44%
Fotocamera
40 / 85 → 46%
Media
73%
86%
Subnotebook - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N (i5-7200U, FHD)
Allen Ngo, 2017-08-31 (Update: 2017-08-31)