C 2018
Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Asus ZenBook UX310UQ-GL011T

Sebastian Bade (traduzione a cura di G.DeLuca), 12/14/2016

Un solido tuttofare! Con lo ZenBook, Asus presenta un compatto dispositivo da 13". Il suo processore Skylake e la GPU dedicata garantiscono un sistema veloce. La nostra recensione mostrerà se il dispositivo presenta qualche svantaggio.

Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T (ZenBook UX310 Serie)
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Core: 1122 - 1242 MHz, Memoria: 900 MHz, DDR3 (Micron), ForceWare 375.86, Nvidia Optimus, HD Graphics 520
Memoria
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, dual-channel
Schermo
13.3 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, AU Optronics AUO142D, TN LED, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Harddisk
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 256 GB 
, SSD + HGST Travelstar HTS541010A7E630, 1000 GB HDD @ 5400 rpm
Scheda audio
Conexant SmartAudio HD
Porte di connessione
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 HDMI, Connessioni Audio: 3.5 mm audio combo, Lettore schede: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Sensore luminosità
Rete
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 18.35 x 323 x 223
Batteria
48 Wh, 4240 mAh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, inferiore, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Borsa Asus, alimentatore, 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.466 kg, Alimentazione: 170 gr
Prezzo
1199 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
 
77.8 MB/s ∼100% +129%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
 
73.7 MB/s ∼95% +117%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
 
73.1 MB/s ∼94% +115%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
 
34 MB/s ∼44%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
 
30.3 MB/s ∼39% -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
 
87.1 MB/s ∼100% +119%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
 
83.28 MB/s ∼96% +110%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
 
80.77 MB/s ∼93% +103%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
 
39.7 MB/s ∼46%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
 
37.3 MB/s ∼43% -6%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
676 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
609 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
505 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
439 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
556 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
526 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
421 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
323 MBit/s ∼58% -42%
255
cd/m²
232
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
232
cd/m²
235
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
i1 Pro
Massima: 255 cd/m² Media: 240.2 cd/m² Minimum: 14.1 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 90 %
Al centro con la batteria: 247 cd/m²
Contrasto: 574:1 (Nero: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.74 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.87 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
88% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.57
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
TN LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
IPS-Panel, 2560x1440, 14
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
-6%
-13%
113%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 (20, 19)
35 (16, 19)
10%
49 (20, 29)
-26%
38.4 (14.8, 23.6)
2%
36.4 (18, 18.4)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (7, 17)
31 (9, 22)
-29%
27 (8, 19)
-13%
24.8 (10.8, 14)
-3%
25.2 (14, 11.2)
-5%
PWM Frequency
50 (30)
50 (50)
0%
50 (30)
0%
220
340%
Screen
6%
35%
17%
-0%
Brightness middle
247
325
32%
347
40%
290
17%
220
-11%
Brightness
240
298
24%
334
39%
280
17%
209
-13%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
80
-11%
93
3%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.43
0.35
19%
0.27
37%
0.31
28%
0.28
35%
Contrast
574
929
62%
1285
124%
935
63%
786
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.74
6.2
-31%
3.29
31%
3.88
18%
4.58
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.14
10.82
-18%
4.69
49%
8.19
10%
11.47
-25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.87
6.32
-30%
3.62
26%
5.47
-12%
2.34
52%
Gamma
2.57 86%
2.3 96%
2.23 99%
2.33 94%
2.26 97%
CCT
7450 87%
6926 94%
7307 89%
6469 100%
6661 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
58
2%
62
9%
63.3
11%
34.6
-39%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88
90
2%
95
8%
96.64
10%
54.2
-38%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
0% / 3%
11% / 24%
65% / 39%
1% / 0%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Grayscales
Grayscales
Color fidelity
Color fidelity
Color Saturation
Color Saturation

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms Incremento
↘ 17 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms Incremento
↘ 19 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 50 Hz ≤ 30 % settaggio luminosita'

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8689 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

The viewing angles of the Asus ZenBook UX310UQ-GL011T.
The viewing angles of the Asus ZenBook UX310UQ-GL011T.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
 
CineBench R10
CineBench R10
CineBench R11.5
CineBench R11.5
CineBench R15
CineBench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
147 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
130 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
118 Points ∼80% -9%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
115 Points ∼78% -12%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
114 Points ∼78% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
662 Points ∼100% +102%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
327 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
294 Points ∼44% -10%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
292 Points ∼44% -11%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
270 Points ∼41% -17%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
1.67 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
1.48 Points ∼89%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1.29 Points ∼77% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1.21 Points ∼72% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
7.42 Points ∼100% +136%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
3.23 Points ∼44% +3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
3.21 Points ∼43% +2%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
3.15 Points ∼42%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
6407 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
5620 Points ∼88% -12%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
14075 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
12670 Points ∼90% -10%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
243.68 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
208.98 Points ∼86%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
194.52 Points ∼80% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
178.14 Points ∼73% -15%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
165.18 Points ∼68% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
37996 Points ∼100% +28%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
29762 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
25958 Points ∼68% -13%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
25149 Points ∼66% -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1391.2 ms * ∼100% -16%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300
1381.8 ms * ∼99% -16%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500
1196.3 ms * ∼86%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600
994.3 ms * ∼71% +17%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6502
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
10897
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4904
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6549 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
14075 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6407 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.15 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
45.61 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.48 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
327 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
130 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
62.78 fps
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4603 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
4463 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
4312 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4274 Points ∼93% -7%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4440 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
4241 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3961 Points ∼89% -11%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3769 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3337 Points ∼89% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
3292 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
3238 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3144 Points ∼83% -17%
PCMark 7
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
4840 Points ∼100% +23%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3933 Points ∼81%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
2481 Points ∼51% -37%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
5585 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, 2500, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
5305 Points ∼95%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
4866 Points ∼87% -8%
PCMark Vantage Result
13885 punti
PCMark 7 Score
5305 punti
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3769 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4440 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4603 punti
Aiuto
SanDisk delivers the SSD in the M.2 2280 format.
SanDisk delivers the SSD in the M.2 2280 format.
M.2 SSD when incorporated
M.2 SSD when incorporated
The 2.5-inch hard drive in its place.
The 2.5-inch hard drive in its place.
The hard drive rotates at 5400 rpm.
The hard drive rotates at 5400 rpm.
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
42%
109%
48%
-6%
Write 4k QD32
200.2
294.3
47%
312.2
56%
319.8
60%
204.6
2%
Read 4k QD32
147.4
395.8
169%
487.6
231%
358.1
143%
149.5
1%
Write 4k
72.07
85.76
19%
153.4
113%
86.5
20%
73.94
3%
Read 4k
22.03
33.3
51%
43.4
97%
29.18
32%
14
-36%
Write 512
272.8
302.6
11%
414.3
52%
Read 512
318.6
419.9
32%
411.4
29%
Write Seq
319.2
302.7
-5%
314
-2%
442
38%
309.1
-3%
Read Seq
468.1
508.4
9%
1209
158%
502.4
7%
469.3
0%
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Valore Minimo di trasferimento: 52 MB/s
Valore Massimo di trasferimento: 107.1 MB/s
Valore Medio di trasferimento: 84.8 MB/s
Tempi di accesso: 21.7 ms
Burst Rate: 241.4 MB/s
Utilizzo CPU: 15.8 %
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2091 Points ∼5% +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1718 Points ∼4% +8%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
1589 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1553 Points ∼4% -2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
12078 Points ∼7% +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
9230 Points ∼5% +8%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
8552 Points ∼5% 0%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
8519 Points ∼5%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
46764 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
45561 Points ∼6% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
43587 Points ∼6% -7%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2636 Points ∼5% +14%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2508 Points ∼5% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2417 Points ∼5% +4%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2321 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2221 Points ∼4% -4%
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2805 Points ∼9% +16%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2578 Points ∼9% +6%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2553 Points ∼8% +5%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2424 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2330 Points ∼8% -4%
3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard AA:0x AF:0x
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14195 Points ∼34% +37%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
11658 Points ∼28% +13%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
10351 Points ∼25%
3DMark 2001SE Standard
28793 punti
3DMark 03 Standard
28408 punti
3DMark 05 Standard
20654 punti
3DMark 06 Standard
10351 punti
3DMark 11 Performance
2424 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
44072 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6264 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1394 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
716 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score
514 punti
Aiuto
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 85.948.739.413.3fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 67.243.829.110.7fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 2416.38.75.3fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.3363334.637.32536.73533.239.636.73147.942.636.639.947.94037.935.232.435.237.95031.933.631.632.331.96332.531.429.128.232.58027.234.926.72627.210025.928.125.82625.912526.127.525.425.426.116024.325.224.623.324.320027.625.922.923.827.625023.732.621.922.723.731524.727.321.121.624.740023.12619.920.223.150023.226.72019.623.263022.326.918.918.622.380024.527.618.418.624.5100025.228.418.21825.2125025.328.717.717.425.3160025.228.817.917.925.2200025.830.317.817.525.8250026.430.717.817.826.4315024.828.61817.924.8400023.728.7181823.7500021.425.318.418.321.4630021.324.818.418.421.3800020.322.918.518.420.3100001920.618.418.4191250018.719.518.318.218.71600018.91918.318.418.9SPL36.240.130.630.536.2N2.53.51.41.42.5median 24.3median 27.3median 18.4median 18.4median 24.3Delta1.71.71.821.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
The small fan is not disturbing.
The small fan...
The small fan is not disturbing.
...is not disturbing.

Rumorosità

Idle
30.5 / 30.5 / 31.5 dB(A)
HDD
30.9 dB(A)
Sotto carico
36.2 / 40 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30.5 dB(A)
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U, GeForce 940MX
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, GeForce 940MX
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 940MX
Noise
-7%
-3%
5%
-0%
off / environment *
30.5
32.2
-6%
31.15
-2%
29.2
4%
28.9
5%
Idle Minimum *
30.5
32.5
-7%
31.15
-2%
29.2
4%
29.2
4%
Idle Average *
30.5
34.6
-13%
31.15
-2%
29.2
4%
29.2
4%
Idle Maximum *
31.5
34.6
-10%
31.15
1%
29.2
7%
30.8
2%
Load Average *
36.2
38.7
-7%
38.2
-6%
33.5
7%
38
-5%
Load Maximum *
40
39.9
-0%
41.7
-4%
38.8
3%
44.3
-11%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Stress test: Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test: Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test: only FurMark
Stress test: only FurMark
Stress test: only Prime95
Stress test: only Prime95
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
GeForce 940MX, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
Heat
-13%
-12%
-32%
-21%
Maximum Upper Side *
38.5
43.4
-13%
51
-32%
51.6
-34%
44.1
-15%
Maximum Bottom *
40.4
43.2
-7%
47
-16%
55.2
-37%
44.9
-11%
Idle Upper Side *
24.8
28
-13%
24.4
2%
30.7
-24%
32.4
-31%
Idle Bottom *
23.8
28.2
-18%
24.6
-3%
31.5
-32%
30.2
-27%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 31.8 °C38.5 °C33.3 °C 
 34.6 °C38.4 °C28.4 °C 
 27.7 °C25.2 °C27 °C 
Massima: 38.5 °C
Media: 31.7 °C
34.6 °C40.4 °C34.5 °C
31.3 °C36 °C33.5 °C
28.4 °C29.1 °C29.8 °C
Massima: 40.4 °C
Media: 33.1 °C
Alimentazione (max)  53 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
The speaker grills are on the front side.
The speaker grills are on the front side.
The two speakers stem from Harman/Kardon.
The two speakers...
The two speakers stem from Harman/Kardon.
...stem from Harman/Kardon.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.134.635.12534.739.634.73138.339.938.34033.135.233.15030.132.330.16327.928.227.98028262810034.12634.112539.225.439.216041.223.341.220044.923.844.925052.622.752.631557.921.657.940060.120.260.15006119.66163062.918.662.980063.218.663.2100062.31862.3125065.317.465.3160065.817.965.8200067.617.567.6250069.917.869.9315071.517.971.5400072.91872.9500072.118.372.1630072.318.472.3800071.518.471.5100007118.4711250070.918.270.91600068.218.468.2SPL81.730.581.7N49.91.449.9median 65.3median 18.4median 65.3Delta8.928.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011TApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.28 / 0.62 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3 / 5.6 / 6.8 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 48.7 / 63 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
6500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
6700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP, IPS-Panel, 2560x1440, 14
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
6200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280, LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Power Consumption
-31%
-6%
-51%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
3
4.9
-63%
4
-33%
5
-67%
4
-33%
Idle Average *
5.6
9.4
-68%
6.6
-18%
9.9
-77%
6.4
-14%
Idle Maximum *
6.8
10.7
-57%
7.4
-9%
10.8
-59%
7
-3%
Load Average *
48.7
46
6%
41.7
14%
52.4
-8%
45.5
7%
Load Maximum *
63
47.2
25%
52.4
17%
89.8
-43%
62.2
1%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

The 48 Wh lithium ion battery...
The 48 Wh lithium ion battery...
... is screwed inside.
... is screwed inside.
maximum battery life
maximum battery life
minimum battery life
minimum battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
H.264 battery life
H.264 battery life
Charging time
Charging time
Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
14ore 38minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
8ore 06minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6ore 59minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
1ore 43minuti
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
6500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 53 Wh
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500
6700HQ, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
11%
-14%
-30%
-32%
Reader / Idle
878
958
9%
718
-18%
660
-25%
H.264
419
424
1%
423
1%
357
-15%
WiFi v1.3
486
433
-11%
389
-20%
298
-39%
329
-32%
Load
103
147
43%
83
-19%
61
-41%

Pro

+ buona autonomia
+ molte interfacce
+ tastiera retroilluminata
+ ampio touchpad
+ compresa la custodia
+ GPU dedicata
+ elevate prestazioni di sistema
+ chassis stabile
+ design elegante e semplice

Contro

- qualità del display sotto la media
- PWM a 50 Hz
- angoli di visuale limitati
- battuta dei tasti leggermente spugnosa
- il display oscilla
In review: the Asus ZenBook UX310UQ-GL011T. Test model provided by Asus Germany.
In review: the Asus ZenBook UX310UQ-GL011T. Test model provided by Asus Germany.

La serie ZenBook Asus è conosciuta per i suoi dispositivi leggeri e mobile e possiamo dirlo anche per l'Asus ZenBook UX310UQ. Con lo ZenBook UX310UQ, ASUS offre un subnotebook duraturo, che convince con materiali di alta qualità e buona costruzione. La configurazione testata costa circa 1200 Euro (~$1267) ed offre buone prestazioni di sistema e ampia autonomia.

A primo impatto, l'Asus ZenBook UX310UQ appare high-end. Peso contenuto e autonomia ampia rendono questo dispositivo un compagno per le nostre attività quotidiane. I clienti avranno un dispositivo elegante per 1200 Euro (~$1267).

Il pannello TN è sotto le attese. Un dispositivo di questo prezzo dovrebbe avere un display nettamente migliore. I dispositivo di input non convincono in pieno. Quindi chi scrive molto non sarà contento dello ZenBook UX310UQ a lungo andare. La custodia in dotazione per trasportare il dispositivo è comoda. In aggiunta, Asus ha fatto un buon lavoro per la connettività. Per essere un 13", ha abbastanza interfacce per collegare le periferiche.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T - 12/06/2016 v6
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
81 /  98 → 83%
Tastiera
81%
Dispositivo di puntamento
75%
Connettività
53 / 80 → 67%
Peso
69 / 35-78 → 79%
Batteria
89%
Display
82%
Prestazioni di gioco
62 / 68 → 91%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
86 / 87 → 98%
Temperatura
94 / 91 → 100%
Rumorosità
90%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Fotocamera
64 / 85 → 75%
Media
76%
84%
Subnotebook - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Asus ZenBook UX310UQ-GL011T
Sebastian Bade, 2016-12-14 (Update: 2016-12-14)