Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Asus Zenbook UX330UA

Sven Kloevekorn (traduzione a cura di G.DeLuca), 11/09/2016

Elegante e duraturo. Il nuovo Zenbook by Asus eredita le migliori qualità della serie, come un case superbo e un peso contenuto. A parte i dispositivi di input in parte mediocri, non presenta molte pecche specialmente non per la fantastica autonomia.

Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T (Zenbook UX330 Serie)
Scheda grafica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Core: 300 - 1050 MHz, Memoria condivisa, 20.19.15.4474
Memoria
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, dual-channel
Schermo
13.3 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 166 PPI, AU Optronics AUO272D / B133HAN02.7, IPS, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Harddisk
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 256 GB 
Scheda audio
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Porte di connessione
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, Connessioni Audio: combo audio in/out, 3.5-mm jack, Lettore schede: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Sensore luminosità
Rete
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 13.5 x 323 x 222.3
Batteria
57 Wh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p CMOS
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, inferiore, Tastiera: chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.2 kg, Alimentazione: 176 gr
Prezzo
1100 EUR

 

Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA

Size Comparison

Left: USB 3.0, audio in/out, SD card
Left: USB 3.0, audio in/out, SD card
Right: Micro-HDMI, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 1, USB 3.0, power
Right: Micro-HDMI, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 1, USB 3.0, power
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
71.2 MB/s ∼100% +135%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
31.4 MB/s ∼44% +4%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
30.3 MB/s ∼43%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
81.33 MB/s ∼100% +118%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
38.3 MB/s ∼47% +3%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
37.3 MB/s ∼46%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
609 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
505 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
439 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
526 MBit/s ∼100% +25%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
421 MBit/s ∼80%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
323 MBit/s ∼61% -23%
357
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 360 cd/m² Media: 337.2 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 86 %
Al centro con la batteria: 360 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1636:1 (Nero: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.23 | - Ø
90% sRGB (Argyll) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.5
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
AU Optronics AUO272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell XPS 13-9350
SHP1420, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Sharp SHP 1447 / LQ133M1JW15, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Samsung 133YL04-P02, , 3200x1800, 13.3
Response Times
-16%
196%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
32 (12, 20)
52.4 (18.4, 34)
-64%
38 (24, 14, Spikes in between)
-19%
Response Time Black / White *
25 (5, 20)
23.6 (12, 11.6)
6%
27 (13, 14, Spikes in between)
-8%
PWM Frequency
200 (80)
220 (50)
10%
1429 (20)
615%
Screen
-4%
-12%
-25%
Brightness
337
276
-18%
326
-3%
352
4%
Brightness Distribution
86
88
2%
87
1%
81
-6%
Black Level *
0.22
0.191
13%
0.36
-64%
0.69
-214%
Contrast
1636
1453
-11%
956
-42%
565
-65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.21
4.88
6%
6.09
-17%
3.04
42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.23
4.26
32%
5.36
14%
2.88
54%
Gamma
2.5 96%
2.59 93%
2.01 119%
2.43 99%
CCT
6506 100%
6562 99%
7230 90%
6848 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
41.6
-29%
62.25
6%
55
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
65.79
-27%
97.54
8%
85
-6%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-4% / -4%
-14% / -13%
86% / 35%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Asus Zenbook UX330UA vs. AdobeRGB
Asus Zenbook UX330UA vs. AdobeRGB
Asus Zenbook UX330UA vs. sRGB
Asus Zenbook UX330UA vs. sRGB
Pixel grid
Pixel grid

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms Incremento
↘ 20 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms Incremento
↘ 20 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Intel Core i7-6560U
130 Points ∼67% +5%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Core i7-6500U
124 Points ∼64%
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points ∼59% -6%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75
100 Points ∼51% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Core i7-6500U
319 Points ∼15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Intel Core i7-6560U
318 Points ∼15% 0%
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel Core i5-6200U
287 Points ∼13% -10%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75
214 Points ∼10% -33%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
124 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
319 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4680 Points ∼72% +7%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4355 Points ∼67%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
4078 Points ∼63% -6%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
3472 Points ∼53% -20%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3883 Points ∼65% +10%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3527 Points ∼59%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
2983 Points ∼50% -15%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
2614 Points ∼44% -26%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3527 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4355 punti
Aiuto
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Dell XPS 13-9350
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
63%
106%
40%
Write 4k QD32
228.9
151.5
-34%
311.3
36%
242.3
6%
Read 4k QD32
142.2
244.7
72%
548.6
286%
288.9
103%
Write 4k
75.12
113
50%
144.9
93%
90.66
21%
Read 4k
18.89
38.52
104%
42.43
125%
28.57
51%
Write 512
275.2
308.6
12%
311
13%
396.2
44%
Read 512
265.9
683.8
157%
612.6
130%
404.8
52%
Write Seq
309.4
307.7
-1%
309.6
0%
423.7
37%
Read Seq
447.6
1097
145%
1193
167%
475.2
6%
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Sequential Read: 447.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 309.4 MB/s
512K Read: 265.9 MB/s
512K Write: 275.2 MB/s
4K Read: 18.89 MB/s
4K Write: 75.12 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 142.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 228.9 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U
2101 Points ∼4% +43%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1469 Points ∼3%
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1398 Points ∼3% -5%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
1083 Points ∼2% -26%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
929 Points ∼2%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
507 Points ∼1%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U
11531 Points ∼7% +48%
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7966 Points ∼5% +2%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7801 Points ∼5%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
4286 Points ∼3% -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
1626 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
60466 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6081 punti
Aiuto
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 57.931.126.2fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 12.3fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 48.325.822.4fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 13.9fps

Rumorosità

Idle
31.2 / 31.2 / 31.2 dB(A)
Sotto carico
37.4 / 41.4 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 31.2 dB(A)
Carico massimo
 30.3 °C42.7 °C31.9 °C 
 26.1 °C39.4 °C27.5 °C 
 24.2 °C24.1 °C24.3 °C 
Massima: 42.7 °C
Media: 30.1 °C
29.8 °C38.3 °C34.7 °C
28.4 °C31.6 °C30.5 °C
26 °C27.7 °C26.8 °C
Massima: 38.3 °C
Media: 30.4 °C
Alimentazione (max)  37.5 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.738.141.7254035.8403138.534.838.54039.333.639.35040.832.940.86342.735.242.78043.930.743.910045.428.945.412545.827.845.816047.526.547.520051.727.651.725055.824.955.831558.72558.740058.92358.950061.122.661.163063.121.463.180065.621.165.6100062.720.262.7125061.419.961.4160066.419.566.420007019.270250069.819.669.8315068.819.368.8400072.919.372.9500075.519.375.5630076.819.376.8800072.119.272.11000067.218.967.2125006418.6641600060.118.960.1SPL82.932.482.9N531.853median 63.1Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059Tmedian 19.9median 63.1Delta5.82.85.835.835.335.336.338.236.936.938.636.3353535.337.635.735.735.734.133.833.835.633.332.932.937.433.436.836.836.938.2404037.238.7383840.739.831.231.247.546.429.929.955.451.630.230.260.356.730.130.166.359.9282868.56026.526.568.556.725.825.865.353.924.924.96452.825.125.162.348.1242458.348.923.923.959.251.223.423.460.75523.423.464.253.723.223.262.748.723.223.258.349.923.423.459.450.723.423.460.743.922.722.752.640.922.622.651.638.922.722.749.738.822.222.247.3median 49.9Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISKmedian 24median 24median 59.45.12.82.85.734.933.546.634.932.633.442.732.638.538.539.438.532.532.932.732.533.33333.133.328.429.530.528.427.729.129.127.726.826.328.326.826.726.52926.725.324.227.825.3242427.72423.424.934.523.423.828.541.423.827.33447.527.327.43447.827.42531.1452525.832.746.725.830.738.152.230.734.141.355.934.142.550.164.942.539.346.661.239.336.944.25936.93845.460.33833.440.755.733.428.435.350.128.42429.6442426.832.947.626.828.434.449.328.431.837.751.531.831.437.551.431.447.955.27047.94.87.920.54.8median 27.4Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055Tmedian 34median 47.8median 27.44.15.75.64.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (20.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (17.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (40.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3 / 6.3 / 7.5 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 36 / 31.5 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
6560U, Iris Graphics 540, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3
Power Consumption
-15%
-1%
-18%
Idle Minimum *
3
3.3
-10%
4.2
-40%
6.4
-113%
Idle Average *
6.3
7.4
-17%
8.4
-33%
6.6
-5%
Idle Maximum *
7.5
8.2
-9%
8.9
-19%
6.8
9%
Load Average *
36
36.5
-1%
15.9
56%
27.5
24%
Load Maximum *
31.5
43.7
-39%
22.5
29%
32.4
-3%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
20ore 25minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
10ore 12minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
1ore 55minuti
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh
Dell XPS 13-9350
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
6560U, Iris Graphics 540, 46 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 45 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
-11%
-30%
2%
Reader / Idle
1225
782
-36%
810
-34%
1013
-17%
WiFi v1.3
612
451
-26%
418
-32%
402
-34%
Load
115
150
30%
89
-23%
182
58%
H.264
486
418

Pro

+ molte possibili configurazioni
+ leggero e sottile
+ case elegante e robusto
+ costruzione buona ma non perfetta
+ USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 1
+ porte ben posizionate
+ ottime prestazioni WiFi
+ schermo molto luminoso e con contrasto elevato
+ buona utilizzabilità outdoor
+ silenzioso e fresco
+ frugale in idle
+ fantastica autonomia

Contro

- connettività limitata
- card reader lento
- no Ethernet
- PWM
- no cover manutenzione, viti torx
- batteria non removibile dall'esterno
- mediocre touchpad
- SSD non velocissimo
in review: Asus Zenbook UX330UA. Test model courtesy of CampusPoint
in review: Asus Zenbook UX330UA. Test model courtesy of CampusPoint

Sebbene il nuovo Asus Zenbook UX360UA-FC059T che costa circa 1100 Euro al momento del test non supera il punteggio del 90%, è ancora un portatile che vorremmo avere.

Il superbo case attira, e peso contenuto ed ampia autonomia innalzano il livello di mobilità. Anche lo schermo convince.

Si prosegue con l'ottima perfomance Wi-Fi, le porte perfettamente posizionate, e un funzionamento silenzioso e fresco. È anche impeccabilmente alimentato e le funzioni sono come dovrebbero essere

Naturalmente, alcuni piccoli punti di critica esistono: La tastiera potrebbe essere di qualità superiore, e non ci siamo abituati alla scorrevolezza del touchpad e ai suoi tasti. Il debole lettore di schede di memoria è davvero superfluo; il produttore avrebbe avuto da spendere pochi soldi per una soluzione adeguata.

Per il nuovo Zenbook suggeriamo una inequivocabile raccomandazione di acquisto. Gli acquirenti che trovano il casing eccitante e possono vivere con perfomance inferiori e una (!) più breve durata della batteria dovrebbero dare un'occhiata più da vicino al Zenbook UX305CA con un pannello 4K. Tuttavia, i leggermente più ingombranti, più pesanti, e non altrettanto duraturi Dell e Lenovo hanno raggiunto ottimi rating di 90 e 86%, ed entrambi hanno i loro punti di forza. Quindi, possiamo dire che abbiamo un set up del tutto convincente.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T - 11/04/2016 v5.1
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis
82 /  98 → 84%
Tastiera
81%
Dispositivo di puntamento
75%
Connettività
50 / 80 → 62%
Peso
73 / 78 → 88%
Batteria
93%
Display
86%
Prestazioni di gioco
61 / 68 → 90%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
85 / 87 → 98%
Temperatura
94 / 91 → 100%
Rumorosità
88%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Fotocamera
64 / 85 → 75%
Media
76%
85%
Subnotebook - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-11- 9 (Update: 2016-11-12)