Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei Y7 (2017)

Florian Wimmer (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 09/27/2017

Convincente. Lo Huawei Y7 prova a convincere i clienti con un case in metallo, un processore potente, ed una grande batteria. Sebbene l'offerta sia buona, la concorrenza nella fascia di prezzo da 200 Euro (~$238) è forte. Vediamo nella nostra recensione come si comporta lo Huawei Y7.

Huawei Y7 (Y Serie)
Processore
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Scheda grafica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memoria
2048 MB 
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 267 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Lettore schede: microSD fino a 128 GB, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: sensore accelerazione, sensore prossimità, bussola
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.4 x 153.6 x 76.4
Batteria
15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 12 MPix f/​2.2, phase-comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: cassa mono inferiore, Tastiera: tastiera virtuale, caricatore USB, cavo USB, Telephone Manager, HiCare, Health, 24 Mesi Garanzia, LTE Cat.4 (150 MBit/s download, 50 MBit/s upload); SAR values: 0,79 W/kg (head), senza ventola
Peso
165 gr, Alimentazione: 64 gr
Prezzo
199 Euro

 

Huawei Y7
Huawei Y7
Huawei Y7
Huawei Y7
Huawei Y7
Huawei Y7

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼100% +379%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.2 MBit/s ∼37% +76%
Huawei Y7
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.4 MBit/s ∼21%
LG X power2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.7 MBit/s ∼18% -13%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.6 MBit/s ∼17% -17%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.1 MBit/s ∼17% -20%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼100% +453%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.6 MBit/s ∼32% +75%
LG X power2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.2 MBit/s ∼18% +1%
Huawei Y7
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.6 MBit/s ∼18%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼17% -4%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s ∼17% -8%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y7 – overview
GPS Huawei Y7 – overview
GPS Huawei Y7 – crossroads
GPS Huawei Y7 – crossroads
GPS Huawei Y7 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y7 – bridge

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
451
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 476 cd/m² Media: 455.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.1 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 92 %
Al centro con la batteria: 467 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1197:1 (Nero: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.35
Huawei Y7
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
LG X power2
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Sony Xperia L1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Huawei Y6 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-8%
-5%
25%
-16%
40%
Brightness
456
425
-7%
237
-48%
463
2%
478
5%
432
-5%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
92
0%
86
-7%
94
2%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.39
0.37
5%
0.13
67%
0.58
-49%
0.13
67%
Contrast
1197
1149
-4%
1823
52%
826
-31%
3369
181%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.3
4.7
-9%
5.5
-28%
2
53%
4.5
-5%
4.8
-12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
4.6
-31%
6.1
-74%
1.7
51%
4.1
-17%
3.2
9%
Gamma
2.35 102%
2.17 111%
2.07 116%
2.1 114%
2.03 118%
2.23 108%
CCT
7273 89%
7445 87%
7943 82%
6394 102%
7139 91%
7090 92%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz14 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 14 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6951 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms Incremento
↘ 14.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
59.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30 ms Incremento
↘ 29.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
43303 Points ∼19%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
30619 Points ∼13% -29%
LG X power2
38547 Points ∼17% -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points ∼21% +9%
Sony Xperia L1
37495 Points ∼16% -13%
Huawei Y6 2017
40981 Points ∼18% -5%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
3928 Points ∼58%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2768 Points ∼41% -30%
LG X power2
3191 Points ∼47% -19%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points ∼55% -5%
Sony Xperia L1
3237 Points ∼47% -18%
Huawei Y6 2017
3487 Points ∼51% -11%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
5365 Points ∼65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3624 Points ∼44% -32%
LG X power2
4157 Points ∼50% -23%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points ∼59% -8%
Sony Xperia L1
4285 Points ∼52% -20%
Huawei Y6 2017
4607 Points ∼56% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
606 Points ∼39%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
620 Points ∼40% +2%
LG X power2
601 Points ∼39% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Sony Xperia L1
743 Points ∼48% +23%
Huawei Y6 2017
734 Points ∼48% +21%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
768 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
208 Points ∼2% -73%
LG X power2
489 Points ∼6% -36%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points ∼6% -31%
Sony Xperia L1
386 Points ∼4% -50%
Huawei Y6 2017
386 Points ∼4% -50%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
686 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
591 Points ∼13% -14%
LG X power2
693 Points ∼16% +1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points ∼29% +84%
Sony Xperia L1
798 Points ∼18% +16%
Huawei Y6 2017
1288 Points ∼29% +88%
System (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
1790 Points ∼27%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1086 Points ∼16% -39%
LG X power2
1758 Points ∼27% -2%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points ∼36% +32%
Sony Xperia L1
1338 Points ∼20% -25%
Huawei Y6 2017
1354 Points ∼21% -24%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
869 Points ∼23%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
536 Points ∼14% -38%
LG X power2
773 Points ∼20% -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points ∼9% -59%
Sony Xperia L1
744 Points ∼20% -14%
Huawei Y6 2017
839 Points ∼22% -3%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
2235 Points ∼26%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
952 Points ∼11% -57%
LG X power2
1448 Points ∼17% -35%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points ∼28% +6%
Sony Xperia L1
1241 Points ∼15% -44%
Huawei Y6 2017
1238 Points ∼15% -45%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
2866 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1562 Points ∼8% -45%
LG X power2
2297 Points ∼12% -20%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points ∼20% +32%
Sony Xperia L1
1875 Points ∼10% -35%
Huawei Y6 2017
1903 Points ∼10% -34%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
645 Points ∼13%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
556 Points ∼11% -14%
LG X power2
593 Points ∼12% -8%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points ∼15% +14%
Sony Xperia L1
674 Points ∼14% +4%
Huawei Y6 2017
680 Points ∼14% +5%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
1340 Points ∼44%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
783 Points ∼26% -42%
LG X power2
1074 Points ∼35% -20%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points ∼50% +14%
Sony Xperia L1
968 Points ∼32% -28%
Huawei Y6 2017
971 Points ∼32% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
281 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
79 Points ∼1% -72%
LG X power2
254 Points ∼5% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points ∼4% -29%
Sony Xperia L1
149 Points ∼3% -47%
Huawei Y6 2017
143 Points ∼3% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
341 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
99 Points ∼3% -71%
LG X power2
306 Points ∼8% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points ∼6% -28%
Sony Xperia L1
184 Points ∼5% -46%
Huawei Y6 2017
176 Points ∼5% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
1360 Points ∼45%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
753 Points ∼25% -45%
LG X power2
1053 Points ∼35% -23%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points ∼51% +13%
Sony Xperia L1
939 Points ∼31% -31%
Huawei Y6 2017
967 Points ∼32% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
533 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
133 Points ∼2% -75%
LG X power2
379 Points ∼5% -29%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points ∼4% -48%
Sony Xperia L1
238 Points ∼3% -55%
Huawei Y6 2017
221 Points ∼3% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
616 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
163 Points ∼3% -74%
LG X power2
442 Points ∼9% -28%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points ∼7% -45%
Sony Xperia L1
285 Points ∼6% -54%
Huawei Y6 2017
267 Points ∼5% -57%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
9345 Points ∼13%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼12% -10%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼12% -10%
LG X power2
8213 Points ∼11% -12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points ∼18% +39%
Sony Xperia L1
10767 Points ∼15% +15%
Huawei Y6 2017
11088 Points ∼15% +19%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
10152 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼1% -69%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼1% -69%
LG X power2
8140 Points ∼2% -20%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points ∼2% -27%
Sony Xperia L1
6015 Points ∼1% -41%
Huawei Y6 2017
6184 Points ∼1% -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
9961 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼2% -63%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼2% -63%
LG X power2
8156 Points ∼4% -18%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points ∼4% -16%
Sony Xperia L1
6669 Points ∼3% -33%
Huawei Y6 2017
6858 Points ∼3% -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
17 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
6 fps ∼0% -65%
LG X power2
13 fps ∼1% -24%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼1% -29%
Sony Xperia L1
11 fps ∼1% -35%
Huawei Y6 2017
11 fps ∼1% -35%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
24 fps ∼5%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
11 fps ∼2% -54%
LG X power2
22 fps ∼5% -8%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼3% -50%
Sony Xperia L1
19 fps ∼4% -21%
Huawei Y6 2017
17 fps ∼4% -29%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
7.5 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2.2 fps ∼0% -71%
LG X power2
5.3 fps ∼1% -29%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1% -32%
Sony Xperia L1
4.1 fps ∼1% -45%
Huawei Y6 2017
3.9 fps ∼1% -48%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
16 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
4.8 fps ∼1% -70%
LG X power2
11 fps ∼3% -31%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1% -68%
Sony Xperia L1
8.8 fps ∼2% -45%
Huawei Y6 2017
8.1 fps ∼2% -49%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
2.3 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1.4 fps ∼0% -39%
LG X power2
3.5 fps ∼1% +52%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.3 fps ∼1% +43%
Sony Xperia L1
2.6 fps ∼1% +13%
Huawei Y6 2017
2.5 fps ∼1% +9%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
12 fps ∼7%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3.4 fps ∼2% -72%
LG X power2
8.6 fps ∼5% -28%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.2 fps ∼2% -73%
Sony Xperia L1
6.3 fps ∼4% -47%
Huawei Y6 2017
6 fps ∼3% -50%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
2.7 fps ∼1%
LG X power2
1.9 fps ∼1% -30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼1% -30%
Huawei Y6 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Y7
5.9 fps ∼0%
LG X power2
4.3 fps ∼0% -27%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼0% -68%
Huawei Y6 2017
fps ∼0% -100%

Legenda

 
Huawei Y7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X power2 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia L1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
25.972 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
20.6 Points ∼79%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
17.643 Points ∼68% -14%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
17.372 Points ∼67% -16%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
16.743 Points ∼64% -19%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
14.55 Points ∼56% -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4560 Points ∼100% +42%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
3209 Points ∼70%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
3092 Points ∼68% -4%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
2712 Points ∼59% -15%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
2684 Points ∼59% -16%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
2273 Points ∼50% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
17405 ms * ∼100% -58%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
13762.8 ms * ∼79% -25%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
12506.5 ms * ∼72% -14%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
12254.8 ms * ∼70% -11%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
11007 ms * ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6820.9 ms * ∼39% +38%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
75 Points ∼100% +70%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
65 Points ∼87% +48%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
60 Points ∼80% +36%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
55 Points ∼73% +25%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
44 Points ∼59%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Huawei Y7Lenovo Moto E4 PlusLG X power2Samsung Galaxy J7 2017Sony Xperia L1Huawei Y6 2017
AndroBench 3-5
51%
20%
20%
-21%
37%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
46.6
-26%
58.09 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
63.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
26.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-58%
26.4
-58%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.3
-20%
76.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
37.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-54%
48.4
-41%
Random Write 4KB
6.9
29.4
326%
10.7
55%
10.54
53%
5.9
-14%
20.54
198%
Random Read 4KB
53.15
19.15
-64%
25.3
-52%
25.86
-51%
13.6
-74%
25.93
-51%
Sequential Write 256KB
33.2
42
27%
41.7
26%
52.98
60%
40.2
21%
66.88
101%
Sequential Read 256KB
119.4
194.4
63%
243.8
104%
198.47
66%
181.9
52%
202.55
70%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high30 fps
Carico massimo
 39.2 °C39.2 °C39.9 °C 
 39.3 °C38.3 °C40.7 °C 
 38.7 °C38.1 °C38.5 °C 
Massima: 40.7 °C
Media: 39.1 °C
33.6 °C34.7 °C36.2 °C
34.1 °C34.6 °C36.1 °C
34 °C35.5 °C35.8 °C
Massima: 36.2 °C
Media: 35 °C
Alimentazione (max)  32.5 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.637.92525.439.23125.332.74032.9275033.627.86331.628.88028.428.31002731.212520.8311602232.220021.337.825020.843.631521.249.440019.457.250019.561.663017.766.980017.971.7100017.873.3125017.375.9160017.475.6200016.776.9250017.276.2315018.270.5400017.969.2500017.676.6630017.775800017.875.51000017.976.31250018.170.71600018.260.6SPL3085.9N1.364.9median 17.9Huawei Y7median 70.5Delta1.313.531.529.231.529.328.629.328.328.728.332.434.632.427.527.727.525.824.825.826.331.526.328.333.828.334.328.334.333.522.933.540.121.140.144.42044.448.42048.453.42253.459.922.959.965.519.365.566.918.366.971.818.371.872.517.972.57116.47172.516.572.573.216.773.271.216.271.273.216.173.27916.27979.816.179.871.116.171.165.616.165.66516654816.14885.829.985.862.11.462.1median 65.6Lenovo Moto E4 Plusmedian 17.9median 65.6122.812hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Y7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto E4 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.57 / 1.61 / 1.62 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.09 / 4.26 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Y7
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
LG X power2
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Power Consumption
-17%
-33%
33%
-55%
Idle Minimum *
0.57
0.89
-56%
0.63
-11%
0.39
32%
0.89
-56%
Idle Average *
1.61
1.87
-16%
1.42
12%
1.06
34%
2.05
-27%
Idle Maximum *
1.62
1.98
-22%
1.47
9%
1.08
33%
2.18
-35%
Load Average *
3.09
3.04
2%
5.89
-91%
1.82
41%
6.02
-95%
Load Maximum *
4.26
4.01
6%
7.85
-84%
3.21
25%
6.94
-63%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
31ore 54minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
11ore 56minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13ore 32minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
6ore 42minuti
Huawei Y7
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
LG X power2
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Huawei Y6 2017
3000 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
10%
32%
24%
-28%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1914
2720
42%
1950
2%
1398
-27%
1522
-20%
H.264
812
1226
51%
1096
35%
656
-19%
693
-15%
WiFi v1.3
716
788
10%
982
37%
904
26%
567
-21%
654
-9%
Load
402
384
-4%
525
31%
223
-45%
302
-25%

Pro

+ elegante case in metallo
+ leggero
+ GPS abbastanza preciso
+ buona qualità chiamata dal lato utente
+ fotografie definite con colori precisi
+ display luminoso
+ elevate performance di sistema
+ buona autonomia

Contro

- patches di sicurezza datate
- microfono di limitata qualità
- immagini della fotocamera frontale spesso troppo luminose
- manca la funzione di ricarica rapida
Recensione: Huawei Y7 (2017). Modello fornito da Huawei Germany.
Recensione: Huawei Y7 (2017). Modello fornito da Huawei Germany.

Con lo Huawei Y7, il produttore ha realizzato un pacchetto interessante. Le immagini della fotocamera principale sono abbastanza definite e con una buona riproduzione del colore. Potete anche registrare video decenti. IN particolare, lo Huawei Y7 è la scelta giusta per i fanatici di smartphones potenti, e per coloro che non vogliono spendere più di 200 Euro (~$238). Grazie al potente SoC, supera dispositivi di prezzo simile e superiore in termini di potenza di calcolo. Visto che funziona bene, ha un buon case, e la batteria dura molto, oltre alla qualità vocale buona (almeno lato utente), sarete contenti di questo dispositivo.

Lo Huawei Y7 convince con immagini della fotocamera definite e con colori buoni, un case in metallo solodo, una ampia autonomia, e prestazioni buone per il suo prezzo. Merita una raccomandazione, anche se ci sono alcuni dettagli che intaccano la buona impressione complessiva.

Quindi perché esitare? C'è un microfono che non ha ottime prestazioni, la fotocamera frontale scatta foto all'aperto troppo luminose, e dovreste considerare anche le patches di sicurezza datate. Ma lo Huawei Y7 offre comunque un buon rapporto prezzo-prestazioni per 200 Euro (~$238).

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Huawei Y7 - 09/15/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
86%
Tastiera
65 / 75 → 86%
Dispositivo di puntamento
91%
Connettività
32 / 60 → 54%
Peso
91%
Batteria
95%
Display
86%
Prestazioni di gioco
19 / 63 → 31%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
40 / 70 → 56%
Temperatura
88%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 61%
Fotocamera
68%
Media
70%
82%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei Y7 (2017)
Florian Wimmer, 2017-09-27 (Update: 2017-09-27)