Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Bluboo S8

Allen Ngo (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 11/18/2017

1/6 del prezzo, 1/6 delle prestazioni. Bluboo cavalca l'onda Galaxy S8 con la sua versione fotocopia per $150 USD. Il Bluboo S8 avrebbe qualità impressionanti se non ci fossero problemi seri.

Bluboo S8 (S Serie)
Processore
Mediatek MT6750
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoria
3072 MB 
Schermo
5.7 pollici 2:1, 1440x720 pixel 282 PPI, Capacitive, SHARP, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
Porte di connessione
Connessioni Audio: 3.5mm, Lettore schede: microSD (condivisa, fino a 256GB), Sensori: sensore G, sensore prossimià, sensore luminosità Ambientale, sensore geomagnetico, USB Type-C
Rete
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz, WCDMA 900/2100MHz (B8/B1), FDD LTE 800/900/1800/2100/2600MHz (B20/B8/B3/B1/B7), Dual SIM, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.4 x 149.5 x 70.6
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix (SW:16.0MP) AF+3MP, Dual Rear Flash LED Light
Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix (SW:8.0 MP)
Altre caratteristiche
Tastiera: Virtuale
Peso
200 gr
Prezzo
200 Euro

 

Left: Volume rocker
Left: Volume rocker
Top: Dual-SIM w/ MicroSD
Top: Dual-SIM w/ MicroSD
Right: Power button
Right: Power button
Bottom: USB Type-C
Bottom: USB Type-C
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
329 MBit/s ∼100% +891%
Huawei Y7
802.11 b/g/n
52.4 MBit/s ∼16% +58%
Bluboo S8
802.11a/b/g/n
33.2 MBit/s ∼10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
651 MBit/s ∼100% +1300%
Huawei Y7
802.11 b/g/n
50.6 MBit/s ∼8% +9%
Bluboo S8
802.11a/b/g/n
46.5 MBit/s ∼7%
522
cd/m²
546.2
cd/m²
547.9
cd/m²
531.2
cd/m²
544.2
cd/m²
542.8
cd/m²
533.9
cd/m²
543.9
cd/m²
538.1
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Massima: 547.9 cd/m² Media: 538.9 cd/m² Minimum: 21.81 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 95 %
Al centro con la batteria: 544.2 cd/m²
Contrasto: 812:1 (Nero: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 8.1 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.01
Bluboo S8
SHARP, IPS, 5.7, 1440x720
Samsung Galaxy S8
Infinity Display, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, Super AMOLED, 5.8, 2960x1440
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
Super AMOLED, 5.7, 2560x1440
Huawei Y7
IPS, 5.5, 1280x720
LG Q6
IPS, 5.5, 2160x1080
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 5.5, 1920x1080
Response Times
90%
88%
9%
21%
89%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45.6 (23.6, 22)
5.6 (2.8, 2.8)
88%
4.8 (2, 2.8)
89%
59.2 (30, 29.2)
-30%
38 (19, 19)
17%
4.8 (2.8, 2)
89%
Response Time Black / White *
34.4 (18.8, 15.6)
3.2 (2, 1.2)
91%
4.8 (2.8, 2)
86%
18.4 (3.6, 14.8)
47%
26 (13, 13)
24%
4 (2, 2)
88%
PWM Frequency
250
231.5
2315 (14)
257.7
Screen
33%
12%
28%
40%
32%
Brightness
539
564
5%
341
-37%
456
-15%
498
-8%
463
-14%
Brightness Distribution
95
94
-1%
90
-5%
92
-3%
88
-7%
86
-9%
Black Level *
0.67
0.39
42%
0.24
64%
Contrast
812
1197
47%
2179
168%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.4
2.7
64%
3.7
50%
4.3
42%
6.4
14%
2
73%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.1
3.1
62%
4.9
40%
3.5
57%
7.4
9%
1.7
79%
Gamma
2.01 119%
2.15 112%
2.25 107%
2.35 102%
2.4 100%
2.1 114%
CCT
8989 72%
6335 103%
7286 89%
7273 89%
8641 75%
6394 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
62% / 52%
50% / 37%
19% / 23%
31% / 35%
61% / 51%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms Incremento
↘ 15.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.6 ms Incremento
↘ 22 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected100 % brightness setting

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼78% +320%
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points ∼75% +307%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
150228 Points ∼66% +256%
Sony Xperia XA1
59082 Points ∼26% +40%
Honor 6X
56764 Points ∼25% +35%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points ∼21% +12%
Huawei Y7
43303 Points ∼19% +3%
LG Q6
42718 Points ∼19% +1%
Bluboo S8
42181 Points ∼19%
Doogee Shoot 1
39275 Points ∼17% -7%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 battery life
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
669 min ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S8
527 min ∼69%
Computer Vision score
Samsung Galaxy S8
2730 Points ∼45% +56%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2024 Points ∼33% +15%
Bluboo S8
1754 Points ∼29%
Storage score
Samsung Galaxy S8
4420 Points ∼29% +28%
Bluboo S8
3445 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3440 Points ∼22% 0%
Work 2.0 performance score
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% +97%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
5972 Points ∼58% +78%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points ∼52% +60%
Huawei Y7
3928 Points ∼38% +17%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points ∼36% +11%
LG Q6
3710 Points ∼36% +11%
Bluboo S8
3347 Points ∼32%
Doogee Shoot 1
2249 Points ∼22% -33%
Sony Xperia XA1
Points ∼0% -100%
Work performance score
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼92%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
6318 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points ∼71%
Huawei Y7
5365 Points ∼63%
LG Q6
5081 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points ∼58%
Sony Xperia XA1
4759 Points ∼56%
Honor 6X
4383 Points ∼51%
Doogee Shoot 1
3653 Points ∼43%
BaseMark OS II
Web
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼76% +84%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points ∼68% +65%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
985 Points ∼58% +41%
Sony Xperia XA1
847 Points ∼50% +21%
Honor 6X
720 Points ∼42% +3%
Bluboo S8
701 Points ∼41%
Huawei Y7
606 Points ∼36% -14%
Doogee Shoot 1
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points ∼1% -99%
LG Q6
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼66% +854%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points ∼66% +847%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4649 Points ∼50% +622%
Sony Xperia XA1
1016 Points ∼11% +58%
Honor 6X
819 Points ∼9% +27%
Huawei Y7
768 Points ∼8% +19%
Bluboo S8
644 Points ∼7%
LG Q6
591 Points ∼6% -8%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points ∼6% -17%
Doogee Shoot 1
383 Points ∼4% -41%
Memory
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +354%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points ∼69% +212%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1948 Points ∼44% +100%
Honor 6X
1779 Points ∼40% +83%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points ∼29% +30%
Sony Xperia XA1
1063 Points ∼24% +9%
Bluboo S8
974 Points ∼22%
LG Q6
736 Points ∼17% -24%
Huawei Y7
686 Points ∼16% -30%
Doogee Shoot 1
558 Points ∼13% -43%
System
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼57% +199%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points ∼52% +173%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3220 Points ∼31% +63%
Sony Xperia XA1
2969 Points ∼29% +51%
Honor 6X
2721 Points ∼26% +38%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points ∼23% +20%
Bluboo S8
1971 Points ∼19%
Huawei Y7
1790 Points ∼17% -9%
LG Q6
1489 Points ∼14% -24%
Doogee Shoot 1
1164 Points ∼11% -41%
Overall
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼100% +293%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points ∼86% +240%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2315 Points ∼61% +140%
Honor 6X
1300 Points ∼34% +35%
Sony Xperia XA1
1284 Points ∼34% +33%
Bluboo S8
965 Points ∼25%
Huawei Y7
869 Points ∼23% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points ∼9% -63%
LG Q6
282 Points ∼7% -71%
Doogee Shoot 1
221 Points ∼6% -77%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Samsung Galaxy S8
8490 Points ∼99% +509%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼93% +475%
Sony Xperia XA1
2747 Points ∼32% +97%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points ∼28% +70%
Huawei Y7
2235 Points ∼26% +60%
LG Q6
1840 Points ∼21% +32%
Bluboo S8
1393 Points ∼16%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼27% +280%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points ∼27% +275%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4359 Points ∼17% +144%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points ∼15% +111%
Sony Xperia XA1
3621 Points ∼14% +102%
Huawei Y7
2866 Points ∼11% +60%
LG Q6
2210 Points ∼9% +23%
Bluboo S8
1790 Points ∼7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points ∼34% +231%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +227%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1891 Points ∼32% +214%
Sony Xperia XA1
828 Points ∼14% +37%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points ∼12% +22%
LG Q6
647 Points ∼11% +7%
Huawei Y7
645 Points ∼11% +7%
Bluboo S8
603 Points ∼10%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 5
2963 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2479 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XA1
1928 Points ∼62%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1864 Points ∼60%
Honor 6X
1438 Points ∼46%
Huawei Y7
1352 Points ∼44%
LG Q6
1028 Points ∼33%
Doogee Shoot 1
966 Points ∼31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 5
4151 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3584 Points ∼51%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3099 Points ∼44%
Sony Xperia XA1
583 Points ∼8%
Huawei Y7
306 Points ∼4%
Honor 6X
299 Points ∼4%
LG Q6
237 Points ∼3%
Doogee Shoot 1
131 Points ∼2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 5
3811 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3261 Points ∼64%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2701 Points ∼53%
Sony Xperia XA1
690 Points ∼14%
Huawei Y7
370 Points ∼7%
Honor 6X
363 Points ∼7%
LG Q6
286 Points ∼6%
Doogee Shoot 1
163 Points ∼3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 5
2960 Points ∼95% +321%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2454 Points ∼79% +249%
Sony Xperia XA1
1900 Points ∼61% +170%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1788 Points ∼57% +154%
Honor 6X
1391 Points ∼45% +98%
Huawei Y7
1382 Points ∼44% +97%
LG Q6
1002 Points ∼32% +43%
Doogee Shoot 1
767 Points ∼25% +9%
Bluboo S8
703 Points ∼23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 5
5077 Points ∼42% +1043%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4908 Points ∼40% +1005%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4635 Points ∼38% +944%
Sony Xperia XA1
833 Points ∼7% +88%
Huawei Y7
542 Points ∼4% +22%
Honor 6X
477 Points ∼4% +7%
Bluboo S8
444 Points ∼4%
LG Q6
425 Points ∼3% -4%
Doogee Shoot 1
220 Points ∼2% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
OnePlus 5
4381 Points ∼66% +805%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4016 Points ∼60% +730%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3424 Points ∼51% +607%
Sony Xperia XA1
978 Points ∼15% +102%
Huawei Y7
620 Points ∼9% +28%
Honor 6X
559 Points ∼8% +15%
Bluboo S8
484 Points ∼7%
LG Q6
482 Points ∼7% 0%
Doogee Shoot 1
261 Points ∼4% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼98% +326%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points ∼81% +251%
Sony Xperia XA1
1804 Points ∼59% +154%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1787 Points ∼58% +152%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points ∼49% +114%
Honor 6X
1440 Points ∼47% +103%
Huawei Y7
1340 Points ∼44% +89%
LG Q6
1016 Points ∼33% +43%
Doogee Shoot 1
852 Points ∼28% +20%
Bluboo S8
710 Points ∼23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% +1182%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points ∼64% +1085%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2767 Points ∼51% +844%
Sony Xperia XA1
574 Points ∼11% +96%
Honor 6X
318 Points ∼6% +9%
Bluboo S8
293 Points ∼5%
Huawei Y7
281 Points ∼5% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points ∼4% -32%
LG Q6
188 Points ∼3% -36%
Doogee Shoot 1
141 Points ∼3% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼92% +958%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points ∼82% +848%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2466 Points ∼63% +632%
Sony Xperia XA1
677 Points ∼17% +101%
Honor 6X
385 Points ∼10% +14%
Huawei Y7
341 Points ∼9% +1%
Bluboo S8
337 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points ∼6% -27%
LG Q6
230 Points ∼6% -32%
Doogee Shoot 1
173 Points ∼4% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼98% +319%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points ∼79% +240%
Sony Xperia XA1
1892 Points ∼61% +164%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1721 Points ∼56% +140%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points ∼50% +114%
Honor 6X
1433 Points ∼47% +100%
Huawei Y7
1360 Points ∼44% +89%
LG Q6
995 Points ∼32% +39%
Doogee Shoot 1
874 Points ∼28% +22%
Bluboo S8
718 Points ∼23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points ∼64% +989%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼62% +954%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4354 Points ∼56% +863%
Sony Xperia XA1
827 Points ∼11% +83%
Huawei Y7
533 Points ∼7% +18%
Honor 6X
468 Points ∼6% +4%
Bluboo S8
452 Points ∼6%
LG Q6
404 Points ∼5% -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points ∼4% -38%
Doogee Shoot 1
218 Points ∼3% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼85% +756%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points ∼81% +714%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3249 Points ∼65% +559%
Sony Xperia XA1
945 Points ∼19% +92%
Huawei Y7
616 Points ∼12% +25%
Honor 6X
550 Points ∼11% +12%
Bluboo S8
493 Points ∼10%
LG Q6
465 Points ∼9% -6%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points ∼7% -31%
Doogee Shoot 1
282 Points ∼6% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
22750 Points ∼32% +284%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points ∼30% +264%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼27% +228%
Sony Xperia XA1
16394 Points ∼23% +177%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼19% +128%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼19% +128%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points ∼18% +119%
Doogee Shoot 1
9525 Points ∼13% +61%
Huawei Y7
9345 Points ∼13% +58%
LG Q6
8983 Points ∼12% +52%
Bluboo S8
5926 Points ∼8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼13% +711%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points ∼8% +408%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
34038 Points ∼7% +376%
Sony Xperia XA1
13125 Points ∼3% +83%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +59%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +59%
Huawei Y7
10152 Points ∼2% +42%
LG Q6
7924 Points ∼2% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points ∼2% +4%
Bluboo S8
7155 Points ∼2%
Doogee Shoot 1
6115 Points ∼1% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼20% +488%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points ∼16% +361%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
30658 Points ∼16% +348%
Sony Xperia XA1
13734 Points ∼7% +101%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +72%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +72%
Huawei Y7
9961 Points ∼5% +46%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points ∼4% +22%
LG Q6
8137 Points ∼4% +19%
Bluboo S8
6840 Points ∼3%
Doogee Shoot 1
6645 Points ∼3% -3%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps ∼7%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
19 fps ∼5%
Sony Xperia XA1
3.7 fps ∼1%
Honor 6X
2.8 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y7
2.7 fps ∼1%
LG Q6
2.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼1%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
11 fps ∼0%
Sony Xperia XA1
7.9 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y7
5.9 fps ∼0%
Honor 6X
3 fps ∼0%
LG Q6
2.1 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼0%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p
Samsung Galaxy S8
30.64 fps ∼80% +858%
Sony Xperia XA1
4.88 fps ∼13% +53%
Bluboo S8
3.2 fps ∼8%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality
Samsung Galaxy S8
42183 Points ∼96% +603%
Sony Xperia XA1
9655 Points ∼22% +61%
Bluboo S8
6004 Points ∼14%
Medium Quality
Samsung Galaxy S8
43852 Points ∼97% +237%
Sony Xperia XA1
18345 Points ∼41% +41%
Bluboo S8
13009 Points ∼29%
Epic Citadel
Ultra High Quality
Samsung Galaxy S8
59.8 fps ∼97% +67%
Sony Xperia XA1
57.8 fps ∼94% +61%
Bluboo S8
35.8 fps ∼58%
High Quality
Bluboo S8
48.2 fps ∼79%
High Performance
Bluboo S8
49.6 fps ∼82%

Legenda

 
Bluboo S8 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei Y7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG Q6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA1 Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Doogee Shoot 1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 5
71.6 Points ∼100% +279%
Samsung Galaxy S8
65.846 Points ∼92% +249%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
56.931 Points ∼80% +201%
Sony Xperia XA1
28.45 Points ∼40% +51%
Honor 6X
26.464 Points ∼37% +40%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
25.972 Points ∼36% +38%
Doogee Shoot 1
20.784 Points ∼29% +10%
Huawei Y7
20.6 Points ∼29% +9%
Bluboo S8
18.884 Points ∼26%
LG Q6
16.53 Points ∼23% -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8
12941 Points ∼100% +304%
OnePlus 5
11945 Points ∼92% +273%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
9863 Points ∼76% +208%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4560 Points ∼35% +43%
Honor 6X
4199 Points ∼32% +31%
Sony Xperia XA1
3956 Points ∼31% +24%
Doogee Shoot 1
3389 Points ∼26% +6%
Huawei Y7
3209 Points ∼25% 0%
Bluboo S8
3200 Points ∼25%
LG Q6
2689 Points ∼21% -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Bluboo S8
14149.8 ms * ∼100%
LG Q6
13102 ms * ∼93% +7%
Doogee Shoot 1
11057.6 ms * ∼78% +22%
Huawei Y7
11007 ms * ∼78% +22%
Sony Xperia XA1
9506.4 ms * ∼67% +33%
Honor 6X
9373.3 ms * ∼66% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
6820.9 ms * ∼48% +52%
OnePlus 5
2621.7 ms * ∼19% +81%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2423.1 ms * ∼17% +83%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1886.6 ms * ∼13% +87%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy S8
194 Points ∼100% +181%
OnePlus 5
161 Points ∼83% +133%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
142 Points ∼73% +106%
Sony Xperia XA1
78 Points ∼40% +13%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
75 Points ∼39% +9%
Honor 6X
73 Points ∼38% +6%
Bluboo S8
69 Points ∼36%
LG Q6
55 Points ∼28% -20%
Huawei Y7
44 Points ∼23% -36%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Bluboo S8
32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S8
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei Y7
16 GB eMMC Flash
LG Q6
32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
16 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
95%
52%
-17%
18%
-16%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.93
53.5
-4%
62.59
12%
62.61
12%
62.6
12%
63.86
14%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.93
63.9
-16%
83.4
10%
82.48
9%
84.8
12%
76.12
0%
Random Write 4KB
12.37
15.25
23%
13.51
9%
6.9
-44%
9.2
-26%
10.54
-15%
Random Read 4KB
38.24
127.17
233%
88.44
131%
53.15
39%
54.3
42%
25.86
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB
77.6
193.23
149%
142.82
84%
33.2
-57%
133.5
72%
52.98
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB
280.99
792.86
182%
458.91
63%
119.4
-58%
263.1
-6%
198.47
-29%
Carico massimo
 41.4 °C34.4 °C31.6 °C 
 39 °C33 °C32.2 °C 
 37 °C34.4 °C31.2 °C 
Massima: 41.4 °C
Media: 34.9 °C
32.8 °C34.6 °C46.4 °C
33 °C34.2 °C42.4 °C
32.8 °C34 °C38.2 °C
Massima: 46.4 °C
Media: 36.5 °C
Temperatura della stanza 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203635.52534.134.43132.633.74033.632.45031.233.96330.931.88031.230.710030.629.612528.829.116027.828.720027.727.825026.728.231525.83440025.540.750025.347.263024.553.280024.359.6100024.567.6125024.474.4160023.974.2200023.671.1250023.873.1315023.472.1400023.677.4500023.478630023.567.6800023.664.31000023.660.31250023.5571600023.653.4SPL36.184.8N2.651.9median 24.3Bluboo S8median 59.6Delta1.417.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Bluboo S8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.95 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (43.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.99 / 1.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.6 / 2.4 / 2.5 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 6.5 / 4 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Bluboo S8
MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy S8
8895 Octa, Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7
Huawei Y7
435, Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
LG Q6
435, Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash, Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Power Consumption
33%
2%
35%
22%
56%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.78
51%
0.88
45%
0.57
64%
0.92
42%
0.39
76%
Idle Average *
2.4
1.1
54%
1.24
48%
1.61
33%
2.19
9%
1.06
56%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
1.16
54%
1.26
50%
1.62
35%
2.24
10%
1.08
57%
Load Average *
6.5
4.15
36%
7.71
-19%
3.09
52%
3.38
48%
1.82
72%
Load Maximum *
4
5.12
-28%
8.64
-116%
4.26
-7%
4
-0%
3.21
20%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
17ore 49minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
6ore 30minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
4ore 15minuti
Bluboo S8
MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2,  Wh
Samsung Galaxy S8
8895 Octa, Mali-G71 MP20,  Wh
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530,  Wh
Huawei Y7
435, Adreno 505, 15.2 Wh
LG Q6
435, Adreno 505, 10.5 Wh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2,  Wh
Autonomia della batteria
48%
13%
74%
18%
107%
Reader / Idle
1069
1667
56%
1476
38%
1914
79%
1367
28%
1950
82%
WiFi v1.3
390
719
84%
444
14%
716
84%
502
29%
904
132%
Load
255
264
4%
221
-13%
402
58%
251
-2%
525
106%

Pro

+ adattatore USB Type-C - 3.5 mm incluso
+ USB Type-C + dual-SIM w/ MicroSD
+ display molto luminoso
+ chassis solido e pesante
+ economico

Contro

- tempi di risposta lenti del display; effetto ghosting
- processore e performance lente
- lettore impronte inaffidabile
- manca un audio da 3.5 mm integrata
- app telefono
- vibrazioni tendono a fare rumore
- cassa poco potente
- autonomia media
- colori imprecisi
Recensione: Bluboo S8. Modello fornito da Bluboo
Recensione: Bluboo S8. Modello fornito da Bluboo

Il Bluboo S8 appare ottimo, piacevole da tenere tra le mani, e con un display 18:9 sorprendentemente luminoso. Per tutto il resto è semplicemente normale nella migliore delle ipotesi, o poco funzionale nella peggiore.

Gli utenti del nord America dovrebbero essere avvisati che il Bluboo S8 non gestisce le bande 3G o 4G necessarie per i principali providers. In secondo luogo, l'app telefono si blocca dopo l'updating all'ultima versione software. La vibrazione è scarsa, i colori imprecisi, il lettore di impronte ci ha richiesto vari tentativi, la fotocamera ha qualità discutibile, e l'assenza di un jack audio sembra un insulto specialmente se consideriamo che le funzioni basilari deludono. Forse abbiamo ricevuto una unità difettosa, ma allo stesso tempo, sicuramente si mette in discussione la qualità del Bluboo e la longevità.

Un clone del Galaxy S8 in superficie, ma un telefono estremamente economico. Non ci aspettiamo molto da un telefono che costa sotto i $150 USD tranne le funzioni base, ma il Bluboo S8 non riesce nemmeno a ricevere o far funzionare bene l'auricolare.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

 

 

Bluboo S8 - 11/16/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Chassis
73%
Tastiera
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositivo di puntamento
84%
Connettività
21 / 60 → 35%
Peso
88%
Batteria
89%
Display
76%
Prestazioni di gioco
20 / 63 → 32%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
37 / 70 → 53%
Temperatura
88%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
30 / 91 → 33%
Fotocamera
32%
Media
62%
73%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Bluboo S8
Allen Ngo, 2017-11-18 (Update: 2017-11-18)