Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Doogee Shoot 1

Marcus Herbrich, Stefanie Voigt (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 03/21/2017

Due sono sempre meglio di uno? I sistemi dual camera non sono più limitati a smartphone di fascia alta – non in un anno come il 2017 tecnologicamente sofisticato. Ora, anche i modelli entry-level possono vantare di telecamere posteriori con due moduli: vedi il modello Shoot 1 del produttore cinese Doogee. Ma la seconda fotocamera nel dispositivo low-budget è davvero un vantaggio? La nostra recensione fornisce la risposta.

Doogee Shoot 1 (Shoot Serie)
Scheda grafica
Memoria
2048 MB 
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, Capacitive, Multi-touch, Sharp LCD, IPS, 2.5D Arc, lucido: si
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.4 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3.5mm Klinkenanschluss, Lettore schede: microSD fino a 256GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: sensore luminosità ambientale, bussola, sensore geomagnetico, sensore gravità, scanner impronte, microUSB 2.0
Rete
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G:850/900/1800/1900MHz 3G:900/2100MHz 4G:FDD-LTE Band 1/3/7/8/20, Dual SIM, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.7 x 156.6 x 77
Batteria
3300 mAh ioni di litio, 5V2A ricarica rapida
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix 13MP+8MP dual cameras, Dual LED flash, 5-piece lens, f/2.2+2.4 aperture
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix lenti angolo 87.8, Anti-shake
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Mono, Tastiera: Virtuale, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, protezione TPU, protezione schermo, cavo USB, caricatore, Doogee UI, 12 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
167 gr, Alimentazione: 63 gr
Prezzo
110 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Size Comparison

156.6 mm 77 mm 8.7 mm 167 g145 mm 73.1 mm 9.9 mm 177 g145 mm 72 mm 9.4 mm 152 g147.5 mm 73.6 mm 6.9 mm 118.2 g144.4 mm 72 mm 9.9 mm 137 g144 mm 72 mm 8.8 mm 141 g143 mm 71 mm 9.35 mm 155 g143.8 mm 70.2 mm 8.3 mm 135 g143 mm 70 mm 8 mm 130 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
279 MBit/s ∼100% +161%
Doogee Shoot 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
107 MBit/s ∼38%
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼17% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 MBit/s ∼100% +83%
Doogee Shoot 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼55%
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47.9 MBit/s ∼26% -53%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249 MBit/s ∼100%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.3 MBit/s ∼35%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼20%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.6 MBit/s ∼18%
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 MBit/s ∼18%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.8 MBit/s ∼18%
LG X Cam
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.8 MBit/s ∼17%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s ∼100%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
73.1 MBit/s ∼36%
LG X Cam
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s ∼24%
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s ∼24%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼24%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.5 MBit/s ∼24%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼23%
GPS Doogee Shoot 1
GPS Doogee Shoot 1
GPS Doogee Shoot 1
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
442
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
Sharp LCD
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 488 cd/m² Media: 462.3 cd/m² Minimum: 18.51 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 89 %
Al centro con la batteria: 488 cd/m²
Contrasto: 2122:1 (Nero: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
Gamma: 2.4
Doogee Shoot 1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Blade A510
IPS, 1280x720, 5
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Wiko Lenny 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
TP-Link Neffos C5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG X Cam
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
-29%
-38%
-47%
-55%
-40%
-42%
-29%
-30%
-3%
Brightness middle
488
528
8%
312
-36%
344
-30%
312
-36%
374
-23%
508
4%
412
-16%
362
-26%
582
19%
Brightness
462
524
13%
302
-35%
349
-24%
315
-32%
343
-26%
491
6%
414
-10%
348
-25%
563
22%
Brightness Distribution
89
94
6%
79
-11%
89
0%
87
-2%
85
-4%
89
0%
94
6%
94
6%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.23
0.62
-170%
0.15
35%
0.65
-183%
0.56
-143%
0.47
-104%
0.58
-152%
0.42
-83%
0.25
-9%
0.38
-65%
Contrast
2122
852
-60%
2080
-2%
529
-75%
557
-74%
796
-62%
876
-59%
981
-54%
1448
-32%
1532
-28%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5
5.2
-4%
8.2
-64%
5.8
-16%
6.8
-36%
6
-20%
7
-40%
5.6
-12%
6.8
-36%
4.4
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.3
8.7
-5%
16.5
-99%
10.7
-29%
14
-69%
11.9
-43%
14.1
-70%
9.7
-17%
11.9
-43%
7.4
11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
5.7
-19%
9.2
-92%
5.7
-19%
7.1
-48%
6.7
-40%
6.1
-27%
6.9
-44%
8.4
-75%
4.8
-0%
Gamma
2.4 92%
1.99 111%
2.29 96%
2.1 105%
2.77 79%
2.19 100%
2.15 102%
2.4 92%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
CCT
7427 88%
6631 98%
9017 72%
7792 83%
7402 88%
8073 81%
8068 81%
8422 77%
8242 79%
6175 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.44

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9377 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
30 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 7 ms Incremento
↘ 23 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 73 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
67 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 28 ms Incremento
↘ 39 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 97 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (39.8 ms).
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
20 MB/s ∼23%
ZTE Blade A510
16.5 MB/s ∼19% -17%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.62 MB/s ∼14% -37%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
15.58 MB/s ∼18% -22%
Ulefone Metal
27.6 MB/s ∼32% +38%
Wiko Lenny 3
19.59 MB/s ∼22% -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.89 MB/s ∼22% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
51.1 MB/s ∼59% +156%
LG X Cam
19.3 MB/s ∼22% -3%
Huawei P9
24.83 MB/s ∼28% +24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
29.18 MB/s ∼30%
ZTE Blade A510
25.55 MB/s ∼26% -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
22.77 MB/s ∼24% -22%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
31.85 MB/s ∼33% +9%
Ulefone Metal
49.6 MB/s ∼51% +70%
Wiko Lenny 3
40.59 MB/s ∼42% +39%
TP-Link Neffos C5
39.11 MB/s ∼41% +34%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
65.5 MB/s ∼68% +124%
LG X Cam
37.13 MB/s ∼38% +27%
Huawei P9
55.05 MB/s ∼57% +89%
Random Write 4KB (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
7.32 MB/s ∼3%
ZTE Blade A510
4.69 MB/s ∼2% -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s ∼3% +13%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.35 MB/s ∼2% -41%
Ulefone Metal
7.87 MB/s ∼3% +8%
Wiko Lenny 3
6.2 MB/s ∼2% -15%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.85 MB/s ∼3% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28.31 MB/s ∼11% +287%
LG X Cam
5.52 MB/s ∼2% -25%
Huawei P9
47.45 MB/s ∼19% +548%
Random Read 4KB (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
18.99 MB/s ∼10%
ZTE Blade A510
14.03 MB/s ∼7% -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s ∼9% -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
14.31 MB/s ∼7% -25%
Ulefone Metal
22.18 MB/s ∼11% +17%
Wiko Lenny 3
15.1 MB/s ∼8% -20%
TP-Link Neffos C5
17.16 MB/s ∼9% -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.9 MB/s ∼9% -6%
LG X Cam
18.07 MB/s ∼9% -5%
Huawei P9
39 MB/s ∼20% +105%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
47.49 MB/s ∼8%
ZTE Blade A510
9.94 MB/s ∼2% -79%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.33 MB/s ∼12% +48%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
7.56 MB/s ∼1% -84%
Ulefone Metal
39.91 MB/s ∼7% -16%
Wiko Lenny 3
11.6 MB/s ∼2% -76%
TP-Link Neffos C5
52.43 MB/s ∼9% +10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
43.95 MB/s ∼7% -7%
LG X Cam
65.84 MB/s ∼11% +39%
Huawei P9
72.19 MB/s ∼12% +52%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
207.66 MB/s ∼14%
ZTE Blade A510
111.91 MB/s ∼7% -46%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.34 MB/s ∼12% -10%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
125.37 MB/s ∼8% -40%
Ulefone Metal
228.84 MB/s ∼15% +10%
Wiko Lenny 3
132.5 MB/s ∼9% -36%
TP-Link Neffos C5
145.77 MB/s ∼10% -30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
144.12 MB/s ∼10% -31%
LG X Cam
201.55 MB/s ∼13% -3%
Huawei P9
281.26 MB/s ∼19% +35%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
39275 Points ∼13%
ZTE Blade A510
24338 Points ∼8% -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points ∼8% -39%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
23657 Points ∼8% -40%
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points ∼13% -6%
Wiko Lenny 3
25237 Points ∼9% -36%
TP-Link Neffos C5
32681 Points ∼11% -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points ∼10% -28%
LG X Cam
35471 Points ∼12% -10%
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼33% +144%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
1684 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade A510
1195 Points ∼4% -29%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1206 Points ∼4% -28%
Ulefone Metal
2458 Points ∼8% +46%
Huawei P9
4904 Points ∼16% +191%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
620 Points ∼10%
ZTE Blade A510
429 Points ∼7% -31%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
428 Points ∼7% -31%
Ulefone Metal
609 Points ∼10% -2%
Huawei P9
1755 Points ∼29% +183%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
852 Points ∼20%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
609 Points ∼14% -29%
Ulefone Metal
1084 Points ∼25% +27%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
796 Points ∼18% -7%
LG X Cam
1001 Points ∼23% +17%
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼58% +194%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
141 Points ∼2%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
65 Points ∼1% -54%
Ulefone Metal
158 Points ∼2% +12%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
101 Points ∼2% -28%
LG X Cam
158 Points ∼2% +12%
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼13% +488%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
173 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
81 Points ∼1% -53%
Ulefone Metal
195 Points ∼3% +13%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
125 Points ∼2% -28%
LG X Cam
194 Points ∼3% +12%
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼17% +463%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
874 Points ∼20%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points ∼14% -29%
Ulefone Metal
1057 Points ∼24% +21%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
810 Points ∼18% -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points ∼16% -18%
LG X Cam
1002 Points ∼22% +15%
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼56% +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
218 Points ∼2%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points ∼1% -54%
Ulefone Metal
243 Points ∼2% +11%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
167 Points ∼2% -23%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points ∼0% -81%
LG X Cam
245 Points ∼2% +12%
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼10% +395%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
282 Points ∼4%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points ∼2% -56%
Ulefone Metal
293 Points ∼4% +4%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
203 Points ∼3% -28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points ∼1% -81%
LG X Cam
294 Points ∼4% +4%
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼16% +339%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
9525 Points ∼11%
ZTE Blade A510
7025 Points ∼8% -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points ∼8% -26%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
6902 Points ∼8% -28%
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points ∼12% +9%
Wiko Lenny 3
7849 Points ∼9% -18%
TP-Link Neffos C5
9291 Points ∼11% -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points ∼11% -3%
LG X Cam
10234 Points ∼12% +7%
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼18% +63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
6115 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
2682 Points ∼1% -56%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points ∼0% -57%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2681 Points ∼1% -56%
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points ∼1% +6%
Wiko Lenny 3
2476 Points ∼0% -60%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4223 Points ∼1% -31%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points ∼1% -37%
LG X Cam
6044 Points ∼1% -1%
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼4% +253%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
6645 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade A510
3109 Points ∼1% -53%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points ∼1% -54%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3103 Points ∼1% -53%
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points ∼3% +6%
Wiko Lenny 3
2920 Points ∼1% -56%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4906 Points ∼2% -26%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points ∼2% -33%
LG X Cam
6649 Points ∼3% 0%
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼8% +199%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
11 fps ∼0%
ZTE Blade A510
4.9 fps ∼0% -55%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps ∼0% -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
8.7 fps ∼0% -21%
Ulefone Metal
19 fps ∼0% +73%
Wiko Lenny 3
4.4 fps ∼0% -60%
TP-Link Neffos C5
14 fps ∼0% +27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps ∼0% -53%
LG X Cam
13 fps ∼0% +18%
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼0% +264%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
11 fps ∼0%
ZTE Blade A510
8.5 fps ∼0% -23%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps ∼0% -25%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.9 fps ∼0% -55%
Ulefone Metal
12 fps ∼0% +9%
Wiko Lenny 3
8 fps ∼0% -27%
TP-Link Neffos C5
8.3 fps ∼0% -25%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps ∼0% -13%
LG X Cam
12 fps ∼0% +9%
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼1% +291%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
4 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps ∼1% -15%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3.6 fps ∼1% -10%
Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps ∼1% -27%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.1 fps ∼1% +53%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps ∼0% -55%
LG X Cam
4.8 fps ∼1% +20%
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼3% +350%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
4 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
3.5 fps ∼1% -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps ∼0% -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps ∼0% -70%
Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps ∼2% +60%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2.8 fps ∼1% -30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps ∼1% +3%
LG X Cam
4.5 fps ∼1% +13%
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼5% +375%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
2.6 fps ∼0%
ZTE Blade A510
1.1 fps ∼0% -58%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps ∼0% -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2.7 fps ∼0% +4%
Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps ∼0% +242%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
LG X Cam
3.1 fps ∼0% +19%
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼0% +285%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
2.6 fps ∼0%
ZTE Blade A510
2.5 fps ∼0% -4%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps ∼0% -54%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps ∼0% -54%
Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps ∼0% +73%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
LG X Cam
2.9 fps ∼0% +12%
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼0% +323%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
3653 Points ∼19%
ZTE Blade A510
2675 Points ∼14% -27%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2807 Points ∼14% -23%
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points ∼21% +12%
Wiko Lenny 3
2832 Points ∼14% -22%
TP-Link Neffos C5
3443 Points ∼18% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4283 Points ∼22% +17%
LG X Cam
3882 Points ∼20% +6%
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼36% +93%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
10 Points ∼0%
ZTE Blade A510
10 Points ∼0% 0%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points ∼29% +5820%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
9 Points ∼0% -10%
Ulefone Metal
10 Points ∼0% 0%
Wiko Lenny 3
632 Points ∼31% +6220%
TP-Link Neffos C5
638 Points ∼31% +6280%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points ∼27% +5410%
LG X Cam
10 Points ∼0% 0%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼51% +10190%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
383 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
174 Points ∼1% -55%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points ∼1% -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
175 Points ∼1% -54%
Ulefone Metal
433 Points ∼2% +13%
Wiko Lenny 3
138 Points ∼0% -64%
TP-Link Neffos C5
281 Points ∼1% -27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points ∼1% -18%
LG X Cam
424 Points ∼1% +11%
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼5% +313%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
558 Points ∼7%
ZTE Blade A510
285 Points ∼4% -49%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points ∼6% -13%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
354 Points ∼5% -37%
Ulefone Metal
802 Points ∼11% +44%
Wiko Lenny 3
293 Points ∼4% -47%
TP-Link Neffos C5
991 Points ∼13% +78%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points ∼10% +33%
LG X Cam
600 Points ∼8% +8%
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼35% +371%
System (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
1164 Points ∼7%
ZTE Blade A510
829 Points ∼5% -29%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points ∼5% -31%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
838 Points ∼5% -28%
Ulefone Metal
1691 Points ∼10% +45%
Wiko Lenny 3
988 Points ∼6% -15%
TP-Link Neffos C5
1199 Points ∼7% +3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points ∼6% -11%
LG X Cam
1178 Points ∼7% +1%
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼24% +238%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
221 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade A510
141 Points ∼2% -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points ∼5% +103%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
148 Points ∼2% -33%
Ulefone Metal
273 Points ∼3% +24%
Wiko Lenny 3
399 Points ∼5% +81%
TP-Link Neffos C5
683 Points ∼8% +209%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points ∼7% +173%
LG X Cam
232 Points ∼3% +5%
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼24% +816%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
20.784 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade A510
12.784 Points ∼4% -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.729 Points ∼4% -39%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
12.755 Points ∼4% -39%
Ulefone Metal
17.831 Points ∼5% -14%
Wiko Lenny 3
14.068 Points ∼4% -32%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.209 Points ∼5% -12%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.094 Points ∼5% -18%
LG X Cam
18.343 Points ∼5% -12%
Huawei P9
68.4 Points ∼19% +229%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
3389 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade A510
2102 Points ∼4% -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1910 Points ∼4% -44%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2122 Points ∼4% -37%
Ulefone Metal
2738 Points ∼5% -19%
Wiko Lenny 3
2133 Points ∼4% -37%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2738 Points ∼5% -19%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points ∼5% -18%
LG X Cam
2752 Points ∼5% -19%
Huawei P9
11783 Points ∼22% +248%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Shoot 1
11057.6 ms * ∼19%
ZTE Blade A510
17364.1 ms * ∼29% -57%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
19234.4 ms * ∼32% -74%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
19092.2 ms * ∼32% -73%
Ulefone Metal
13397.3 ms * ∼23% -21%
Wiko Lenny 3
14862.9 ms * ∼25% -34%
TP-Link Neffos C5
12783.4 ms * ∼21% -16%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12952.9 ms * ∼22% -17%
LG X Cam
12958.3 ms * ∼22% -17%
Huawei P9
2922.6 ms * ∼5% +74%

Legenda

 
Doogee Shoot 1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade A510 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Lenny 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Cam Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 41.2 °C38.5 °C33.7 °C 
 42 °C38.6 °C34.3 °C 
 43 °C41 °C34.8 °C 
Massima: 43 °C
Media: 38.6 °C
32.1 °C33.5 °C36.3 °C
32.2 °C32.9 °C38.9 °C
32.1 °C33.4 °C40.1 °C
Massima: 40.1 °C
Media: 34.6 °C
Alimentazione (max)  29.2 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 38.6 °C / 101 F, rispetto alla media di 33.1 °C / 92 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Smartphone.
(±) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 43 °C / 109 F, rispetto alla media di 35.5 °C / 96 F, che varia da 22.4 a 51.7 °C per questa classe Smartphone.
(±) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 40.1 °C / 104 F, rispetto alla media di 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 31.5 °C / 89 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.645.32525.443.33125.337.84032.937.85033.638.86331.636.68028.436.31002734.912520.828.91602226.420021.332.125020.84131521.252.640019.460.750019.566.163017.768.680017.974.4100017.878.5125017.374.3160017.471.5200016.770.8250017.268.7315018.267.5400017.961.8500017.651.7630017.748800017.852.41000017.950.61250018.134.71600018.224.3SPL3082.6N1.345.4median 17.9median 52.6Delta1.314.731.636.725.435.425.33932.935.233.633.731.635.428.434.9272720.823.8222421.322.820.824.621.222.219.425.419.533.417.746.617.960.617.868.217.369.317.47216.773.717.268.418.268.317.969.417.667.517.756.217.852.917.95818.156.718.2403080.31.338.2median 17.9median 56.21.319.432.441.331.337.831.735.42634.939.440.336.232.928.632.525.424.321.323.723.322.422.525.822.426.221.336.518.444.417.55617.560.817.269.516.870.117.372.817.472.316.672.217.368.717.665.417.667.117.76717.467.817.769.217.968.618.162.718.151.329.881.21.346.6median 17.7median 65.41.614.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDoogee Shoot 1ZTE Blade A510Archos 50 Platinum 4G
Doogee Shoot 1 analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.64 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 18% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

ZTE Blade A510 analisi audio

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.26 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 15.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Archos 50 Platinum 4G analisi audio

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.17 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.48 / 1.58 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.11 / 4.37 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Doogee Shoot 1
3300 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
LG X Cam
2500 mAh
Power Consumption
-16%
9%
-8%
-73%
-34%
-39%
0%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.61
16%
0.63
14%
0.59
19%
1.41
-93%
0.76
-4%
0.72
1%
0.68
7%
0.64
12%
Idle Average *
1.48
1.75
-18%
1.37
7%
1.68
-14%
2.46
-66%
2.16
-46%
1.87
-26%
1.58
-7%
1.38
7%
Idle Maximum *
1.58
1.83
-16%
1.71
-8%
1.79
-13%
2.83
-79%
2.35
-49%
2
-27%
1.61
-2%
1.43
9%
Load Average *
3.11
4.49
-44%
2.82
9%
4.22
-36%
5.15
-66%
4.65
-50%
5.99
-93%
3.36
-8%
3.99
-28%
Load Maximum *
4.37
5.14
-18%
3.36
23%
4.26
3%
7.05
-61%
5.35
-22%
6.45
-48%
3.91
11%
4.49
-3%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8ore 21minuti
Doogee Shoot 1
3300 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
LG X Cam
2500 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
WiFi v1.3
501
416
-17%
517
3%
384
-23%
403
-20%
549
10%
453
-10%
630
26%
457
-9%

Pro

+ Luminoso pannello IPS
+ risoluzione 1080p
+ rappresentazione del contrasto e del colore
+ buona velocità WLAN
+ prezzo
+ hardware potente (smartphone entry-level)

Contro

- Segnale GPS
- sistema Dual-camera con qualche pecca
- Temperature
- scarsa qualità della cassa
Recensione: Doogee Shoot 1. Dispositivo di Test fornito da Doogee.

Nei nostri tests, il Doogee Shoot 1 ha dimostrato di essere un buon smartphone entry-level nella fascia di prezzo più basso. Con 16 GB di ROM e 2 GB di RAM, la quantità di memoria interna è ragionevole per il suo prezzo. Insieme al MediaTek SoC, linea di massima il pacchetto hardware fornisce una potenza sufficiente ad avere un sistema fluidio. Inoltre, il Doogee Shoot 1 offre un elevato contrasto, alta risoluzione del pannello IPS - e una buona durata della batteria.

La particolare feature dello smartphone entry-level, il sistema a doppia fotocamera sul retro del dispositivo, è purtroppo un po' deludente. Il software non usa le informazioni extra dettagliate molto bene - l'effetto bokeh che produce è impreciso e tende ad offuscare parti del soggetto delle foto. Tutto sommato, però, la qualità degli scatti "normali" può certamente essere al livello della concorrenza in questa fascia di prezzo.

Siamo stati meno attratti dalla scarsa qualità degli altoparlanti, dal modulo GPS impreciso, e le temperature alquanto alte sotto carico. Il casing potrebbe anche essere un po' più elegante, a nostro parere.

The Doogee Shoot 1 è un'alternativa interessante sul mercato di fascia bassa - ma il secondo modulo fotocamera posteriore non è ben implementato.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

 

 

Doogee Shoot 1 - 03/13/2017 v6(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
82%
Tastiera
68 / 75 → 90%
Dispositivo di puntamento
88%
Connettività
38 / 60 → 63%
Peso
91%
Batteria
91%
Display
85%
Prestazioni di gioco
11 / 63 → 17%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
31 / 70 → 44%
Temperatura
87%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Fotocamera
62%
Media
68%
79%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Doogee Shoot 1
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-03-21 (Update: 2017-03-21)