Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Doogee Mix

Florian Wimmer (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 09/21/2017

Un buon tentativo. Display Tri-Bezel-Less, dual camera, 6 GB di RAM: a primo impatto, le specifiche sono impressionanti, ma guardando dietro la tenda ci sono alcune pecche. Vediamo se lo smartphone Doogee Mix valga il prezzo richiesto.

Doogee Mix
Processore
Mediatek Helio P25
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-T880 MP2
Memoria
6144 MB 
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 267 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 57 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3.5mm-Audioport, Lettore schede: microSD fino a 128GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: sensore accelerazione, giroscopio, sensore prossimità, bussola, USB-OTG, HotKnot
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (900/​2100), LTE (B1/3/7/8/20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.95 x 144 x 76.2
Batteria
12.77 Wh, 3360 mAh ioni di litio, Autonomia della batteria (dichiarata dal produttore): 12 ore, Tempo conversazione 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 45 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 16 MPix Dual-camera 16MP+8MP, phase contrast-AF, dual LED flash, registrazione video 4K
Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: cassa mono inferiore, Tastiera: tastiera virtuale, Alimentatore, cavo USB, tool SIM card, cover, protezione schermo, panno pulizia, supporto, DG Xender, System Manager, 12 Mesi Garanzia, UKW radio, SAR value: 0,420W/kg (head), 1,341W/kg (body), LTE Cat.6 (download fino a 300 MBit/s, upload fino a 50 MBit/s), senza ventola
Peso
198 gr, Alimentazione: 50 gr
Prezzo
219 Euro

 

Doogee Mix
Doogee Mix
Doogee Mix
Doogee Mix
Doogee Mix
Doogee Mix
Doogee Mix
Doogee Mix
Doogee Mix

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Wiko WIM
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
351 MBit/s ∼100% +595%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
289 MBit/s ∼82% +472%
Nokia 6
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
117 MBit/s ∼33% +132%
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s ∼16% +8%
Doogee Mix
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼14%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
46.5 MBit/s ∼13% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Wiko WIM
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
276 MBit/s ∼100% +158%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
234 MBit/s ∼85% +119%
Nokia 6
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼41% +6%
Doogee Mix
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
107 MBit/s ∼39%
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57.9 MBit/s ∼21% -46%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.7 MBit/s ∼20% -49%
GPS Doogee Mix – overview
GPS Doogee Mix – overview
GPS Doogee Mix – crossing
GPS Doogee Mix – crossing
GPS Doogee Mix – bridge
GPS Doogee Mix – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – oveview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – oveview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
Shot of the reference card
Shot of the reference card
Reference card detail
Reference card detail
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each field represents the target color.
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each field represents the target color.
340
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 370 cd/m² Media: 353.9 cd/m² Minimum: 12.36 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 90 %
Contrasto: ∞:1 (Nero: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.33
Doogee Mix
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.5
Nokia 6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Wiko WIM
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Oukitel K6000 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 6X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Xiaomi Mi Mix
IPS, 2040x1080, 6.4
Screen
-18%
-12%
-94%
-2%
25%
Brightness
354
501
42%
353
0%
352
-1%
540
53%
576
63%
Brightness Distribution
90
94
4%
90
0%
87
-3%
94
4%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.36
0.52
0.57
0.42
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.9
6.4
-31%
5.7
-16%
10.5
-114%
5.1
-4%
2.7
45%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
7.2
-85%
5.1
-31%
13.9
-256%
6.2
-59%
4.2
-8%
Gamma
2.33 103%
2.28 105%
2.73 88%
2.51 96%
2.09 115%
2.23 108%
CCT
7260 90%
7904 82%
7407 88%
12118 54%
6546 99%
7287 89%
Contrast
1422
710
960
1374

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 62.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 62.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 62.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 55 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9304 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 247500) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms Incremento
↘ 2 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms Incremento
↘ 2.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.6 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
60164 Points ∼26%
Nokia 6
47066 Points ∼21% -22%
Wiko WIM
67000 Points ∼29% +11%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
44842 Points ∼20% -25%
Honor 6X
56764 Points ∼25% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
138072 Points ∼61% +129%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
4908 Points ∼71%
Nokia 6
3723 Points ∼53% -24%
Wiko WIM
4660 Points ∼67% -5%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
3132 Points ∼45% -36%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
6127 Points ∼73%
Nokia 6
4980 Points ∼59% -19%
Wiko WIM
5621 Points ∼67% -8%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
4280 Points ∼51% -30%
Honor 6X
4383 Points ∼52% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
5179 Points ∼61% -15%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
813 Points ∼53%
Nokia 6
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Wiko WIM
933 Points ∼61% +15%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 6X
720 Points ∼47% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
1026 Points ∼67% +26%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
1115 Points ∼13%
Nokia 6
731 Points ∼8% -34%
Wiko WIM
965 Points ∼11% -13%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
637 Points ∼7% -43%
Honor 6X
819 Points ∼10% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
3415 Points ∼40% +206%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
1243 Points ∼28%
Nokia 6
587 Points ∼13% -53%
Wiko WIM
1007 Points ∼23% -19%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
887 Points ∼20% -29%
Honor 6X
1779 Points ∼40% +43%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
1747 Points ∼39% +41%
System (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
3063 Points ∼47%
Nokia 6
2135 Points ∼32% -30%
Wiko WIM
3549 Points ∼54% +16%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
1992 Points ∼30% -35%
Honor 6X
2721 Points ∼41% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
3399 Points ∼52% +11%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
1363 Points ∼36%
Nokia 6
307 Points ∼8% -77%
Wiko WIM
1339 Points ∼35% -2%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
323 Points ∼9% -76%
Honor 6X
1300 Points ∼34% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
2136 Points ∼56% +57%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
2922 Points ∼34%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
1935 Points ∼23% -34%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
3903 Points ∼15%
Nokia 6
2844 Points ∼11% -27%
Wiko WIM
4562 Points ∼18% +17%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
2688 Points ∼11% -31%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
840 Points ∼14%
Nokia 6
667 Points ∼11% -21%
Wiko WIM
939 Points ∼16% +12%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
618 Points ∼10% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
1876 Points ∼62%
Nokia 6
1225 Points ∼40% -35%
Wiko WIM
2106 Points ∼70% +12%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
1143 Points ∼38% -39%
Honor 6X
1440 Points ∼48% -23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
1953 Points ∼65% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
649 Points ∼12%
Nokia 6
243 Points ∼5% -63%
Wiko WIM
381 Points ∼7% -41%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
323 Points ∼6% -50%
Honor 6X
318 Points ∼6% -51%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
2291 Points ∼43% +253%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
759 Points ∼20%
Nokia 6
296 Points ∼8% -61%
Wiko WIM
466 Points ∼12% -39%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
384 Points ∼10% -49%
Honor 6X
385 Points ∼10% -49%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
2207 Points ∼57% +191%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
1912 Points ∼63%
Nokia 6
1238 Points ∼41% -35%
Wiko WIM
2140 Points ∼71% +12%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
1146 Points ∼38% -40%
Honor 6X
1433 Points ∼48% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
1990 Points ∼66% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
938 Points ∼12%
Nokia 6
495 Points ∼6% -47%
Wiko WIM
742 Points ∼10% -21%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
478 Points ∼6% -49%
Honor 6X
468 Points ∼6% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
3874 Points ∼50% +313%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
1058 Points ∼21%
Nokia 6
571 Points ∼11% -46%
Wiko WIM
868 Points ∼17% -18%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
549 Points ∼11% -48%
Honor 6X
550 Points ∼11% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
3200 Points ∼64% +202%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
16619 Points ∼23%
Nokia 6
8973 Points ∼12% -46%
Wiko WIM
16939 Points ∼24% +2%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
9959 Points ∼14% -40%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼19% -19%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼19% -19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
22860 Points ∼32% +38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
14288 Points ∼3%
Nokia 6
9605 Points ∼2% -33%
Wiko WIM
13241 Points ∼3% -7%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
10361 Points ∼2% -27%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% -21%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
36559 Points ∼8% +156%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
14748 Points ∼7%
Nokia 6
9457 Points ∼5% -36%
Wiko WIM
14074 Points ∼7% -5%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
10269 Points ∼5% -30%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% -20%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
32263 Points ∼16% +119%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
24 fps ∼2%
Nokia 6
16 fps ∼1% -33%
Wiko WIM
23 fps ∼2% -4%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
17 fps ∼1% -29%
Honor 6X
18 fps ∼1% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
85 fps ∼6% +254%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
35 fps ∼8%
Nokia 6
16 fps ∼3% -54%
Wiko WIM
23 fps ∼5% -34%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
16 fps ∼3% -54%
Honor 6X
19 fps ∼4% -46%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
60 fps ∼13% +71%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
11 fps ∼2%
Nokia 6
7.1 fps ∼1% -35%
Wiko WIM
10 fps ∼2% -9%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
6.8 fps ∼1% -38%
Honor 6X
4.6 fps ∼1% -58%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
47 fps ∼9% +327%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
22 fps ∼6%
Nokia 6
7 fps ∼2% -68%
Wiko WIM
10 fps ∼3% -55%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
6.8 fps ∼2% -69%
Honor 6X
8.5 fps ∼2% -61%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
47 fps ∼13% +114%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
6.8 fps ∼2%
Nokia 6
4.6 fps ∼1% -32%
Wiko WIM
6.4 fps ∼2% -6%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
4.6 fps ∼1% -32%
Honor 6X
2.5 fps ∼1% -63%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
30 fps ∼7% +341%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
16 fps ∼9%
Nokia 6
4.5 fps ∼3% -72%
Wiko WIM
6.4 fps ∼4% -60%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
4.5 fps ∼3% -72%
Honor 6X
4.9 fps ∼3% -69%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
31 fps ∼18% +94%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
4.1 fps ∼1%
Nokia 6
2.5 fps ∼1% -39%
Wiko WIM
3.8 fps ∼1% -7%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
2.4 fps ∼1% -41%
Honor 6X
2.8 fps ∼1% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
19 fps ∼5% +363%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Doogee Mix
8.3 fps ∼0%
Nokia 6
2.5 fps ∼0% -70%
Wiko WIM
3.5 fps ∼0% -58%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
2.4 fps ∼0% -71%
Honor 6X
3 fps ∼0% -64%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
20 fps ∼1% +141%

Legenda

 
Doogee Mix Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko WIM Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel K6000 Plus Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi Mix Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Mix (Chrome 55)
58.4 Points ∼100% +137%
Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59)
26.965 Points ∼46% +10%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
26.464 Points ∼45% +8%
Doogee Mix (Chrome 60)
24.6 Points ∼42%
Oukitel K6000 Plus (Standard Browser 7.0)
20.2 Points ∼35% -18%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
17.558 Points ∼30% -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Mix (Chrome 55)
9608 Points ∼100% +130%
Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59)
4625 Points ∼48% +11%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
4199 Points ∼44% +1%
Doogee Mix (Chrome 60)
4175 Points ∼43%
Oukitel K6000 Plus (Standard Browser 7.0)
3066 Points ∼32% -27%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
2899 Points ∼30% -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Oukitel K6000 Plus (Standard Browser 7.0)
22626.8 ms * ∼100% -120%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
12062.3 ms * ∼53% -17%
Doogee Mix (Chrome 60)
10305.6 ms * ∼46%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
9373.3 ms * ∼41% +9%
Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59)
8781.2 ms * ∼39% +15%
Xiaomi Mi Mix (Chrome 55)
2403.9 ms * ∼11% +77%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Mi Mix (Chrome 55)
107 Points ∼100% +39%
Doogee Mix (Chrome 60)
77 Points ∼72%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
73 Points ∼68% -5%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
60 Points ∼56% -22%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Doogee MixNokia 6Wiko WIMOukitel K6000 PlusHonor 6XXiaomi Mi Mix
AndroBench 3-5
-17%
-6%
-5%
23%
43%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
69.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
56.6
-18%
61.4
-11%
49.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-29%
34.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.6
8%
83.8
7%
72.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
52.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-33%
Random Write 4KB
11.2
11.34
1%
13.34
19%
9.44
-16%
45.05
302%
15.15
35%
Random Read 4KB
66.5
33.8
-49%
38.1
-43%
64.59
-3%
39.55
-41%
116.6
75%
Sequential Write 256KB
165
77.06
-53%
136.67
-17%
190.35
15%
73.85
-55%
161.25
-2%
Sequential Read 256KB
249
273.06
10%
272.08
9%
278.56
12%
283.37
14%
409.86
65%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high30 fps
Carico massimo
 38.6 °C34.6 °C32.8 °C 
 37.7 °C37.9 °C36.3 °C 
 36.1 °C36.8 °C32.9 °C 
Massima: 38.6 °C
Media: 36 °C
30.8 °C31.9 °C39.8 °C
30.2 °C31.8 °C40.3 °C
31.3 °C31.8 °C37.5 °C
Massima: 40.3 °C
Media: 33.9 °C
Alimentazione (max)  31.4 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.633.52525.429.83125.328.74032.9305033.623.66331.629.18028.425.41002726.112520.824.41602221.920021.324.425020.832.231521.241.540019.450.950019.559.963017.765.780017.968.7100017.869.7125017.369.3160017.467200016.768.1250017.270315018.268.1400017.971500017.674.6630017.775.1800017.869.71000017.968.41250018.163.81600018.255.6SPL3081.8N1.351.2median 17.9Doogee Mixmedian 67Delta1.312.731.642.625.437.525.334.632.931.333.630.931.632.428.429.72728.420.829.22231.721.336.920.84621.252.319.455.819.559.117.760.817.966.617.871.517.37517.472.316.772.717.271.618.270.717.967.617.666.617.761.617.856.517.957.118.156.918.242.23081.91.346.3median 17.9Honor 6Xmedian 59.11.311hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Doogee Mix audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 6X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.52 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.13 / 1.7 / 1.74 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 2.78 / 5.01 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Doogee Mix
3360 mAh
Nokia 6
3000 mAh
Wiko WIM
3200 mAh
Oukitel K6000 Plus
6080 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix
4400 mAh
Power Consumption
-2%
19%
-33%
-5%
-80%
Idle Minimum *
1.13
0.63
44%
0.93
18%
0.88
22%
0.82
27%
0.87
23%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.75
-3%
1.28
25%
2.02
-19%
2
-18%
2.16
-27%
Idle Maximum *
1.74
1.87
-7%
1.37
21%
2.09
-20%
2.03
-17%
2.28
-31%
Load Average *
2.78
3.56
-28%
2.39
14%
5.33
-92%
3.34
-20%
9.21
-231%
Load Maximum *
5.01
5.85
-17%
4.25
15%
7.74
-54%
4.92
2%
11.76
-135%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
9ore 33minuti
Doogee Mix
3360 mAh
Nokia 6
3000 mAh
Wiko WIM
3200 mAh
Oukitel K6000 Plus
6080 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix
4400 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
17%
-14%
50%
67%
12%
Reader / Idle
1695
2250
1797
WiFi v1.3
573
670
17%
492
-14%
861
50%
957
67%
644
12%
Load
228
375
292
H.264
542
885
964

Pro

+ case robusto
+ schermo tri-bezel-less
+ sensore impronte
+ buona dotazione di spazio
+ SoC brillante
+ LTE veloce
+ display AMOLED buono
+ molte opzioni di input
+ patches di sicurezza aggiornate
+ registrazione video 4K

Contro

- sfarfallio dello schermo con bassa luminosità
- foto scure e non definite
- solo poche bande LTE
- il microfono produce rumori fastidiosi
- schermo solo 720p
- la protezione dello schermo non si monta perfettamente
Recensione: Doogee Mix. Dispositivo di test fornito da Doogee.
Recensione: Doogee Mix. Dispositivo di test fornito da Doogee.

Schermo tri-bezel-less, come è stato ed è ancora sullo Xiaomi Mi Mix, indubbiamente è il principale vanto del Doogee Mix. Un passo alla volta, i produttori più affermati passano ai bezel-less e devono trovare qualcosa di nuovo per attirare clienti. Doogee ci prova con uno smartphone con un SoC più potente ed una dual-camera andando un po' oltre lo standard di questa fascia di prezzo. I piani riescono a metà: il SoC è davvero molto convincente, la fotocamera invece ha scatti scuri e poco definiti ma c'è la possibilità di registrare in 4K.

La dual-camera non ci ha convinto. Per fortuna, le elevate prestazioni, lo schermo ingegnoso bezel-less AMOLED, il software aggiornato e il buon rapporto di prezzo sono buoni motivi per comprare il Doogee Mix.

Ci sono solo piccoli avvertimenti, la protezione dello schermo non si fissa bene, le possibilità di controllo del sensore di impronte sono limitate e lo schermo sfarfalla. Vari aspetti positivi possono rendere attraente questo telefono. La garanzia standard, molti accessori, e una buona dotazione di spazio, un case solido e aggiornamenti di sicurezza, sono rarità nei dispositivi Android.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Doogee Mix - 09/13/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
87%
Tastiera
66 / 75 → 88%
Dispositivo di puntamento
94%
Connettività
38 / 60 → 64%
Peso
88%
Batteria
92%
Display
73%
Prestazioni di gioco
34 / 63 → 54%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
50 / 70 → 72%
Temperatura
89%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Fotocamera
52%
Media
71%
80%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Doogee Mix
Florian Wimmer, 2017-09-21 (Update: 2017-09-21)