Notebookcheck

Recensione Breve dello Smartphone Oukitel K6000 Plus

Inge Schwabe, 07/15/2017

Un carico di tecnologia. Questo smartphone Cinese sulla carta pare molto buoni, 4 gigabytes di RAM, 64 gigabytes di spazio, una fotocamera da 16-megapixel, ed una potente batteria. Ma questo attraente smartphone nella pratica come si comporta?

Oukitel K6000 Plus (K Serie)
Processore
Mediatek MT6750 1.5 GHz
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2, Core: 680 MHz
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 401 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, LCD, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 53.9 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3.5-mm jack, Lettore schede: micro-SD, max. 256 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: accelerometro, sensori prossimità e luce ambientale, lettore impronte frontale, micro-USB 2.0 OTG, HotKnot
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM:850/900/1800/1900; HSPA:900/2100; LTE:1/3/7/8/20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 9.6 x 155 x 76.6
Batteria
6080 mAh ioni di litio, Tempo conversazione 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 46 ore, Standby 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 360 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 16 MPix f/​2.0, dual-LED, PDAF
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix grandangolo 80° per groupies
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: mono, Tastiera: virtuale, alimentatore, cavo, adattatore USB OTG, protezione, 12 Mesi Garanzia, FM tuner, senza ventola
Peso
207 gr, Alimentazione: 64 gr
Prezzo
220 (~$180) Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Doogee Shoot 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
107 MBit/s ∼100% +130%
Oukitel U16 Max
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
99.1 MBit/s ∼93% +113%
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
79.9 MBit/s ∼75% +72%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
46.5 MBit/s ∼43%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.2 MBit/s ∼43% -1%
Blackview R6
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41.9 MBit/s ∼39% -10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Doogee Shoot 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼100% +85%
Oukitel U16 Max
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
99.7 MBit/s ∼99% +82%
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
78.7 MBit/s ∼78% +44%
Oukitel K6000 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.7 MBit/s ∼54%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s ∼54% 0%
Blackview R6
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.6 MBit/s ∼49% -9%
GPS test Oukitel K6000 Plus Overview
GPS test Oukitel K6000 Plus Crossing
GPS test Oukitel K6000 Plus Bridge
GPS test Garmin Edge 500 Overview
Overview
GPS test Garmin Edge 500 Crossing
Crossing
GPS test Garmin Edge 500 Bridge
Bridge

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
366
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
369
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 370 cd/m² Media: 351.9 cd/m² Minimum: 15.82 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 87 %
Al centro con la batteria: 369 cd/m²
Contrasto: 710:1 (Nero: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 13.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.51
Oukitel K6000 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Sony Xperia E5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Oukitel U16 Max
1280x720, 6
LG K10 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Doogee Shoot 1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Blackview R6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
57%
41%
30%
68%
22%
Brightness
352
534
52%
405
15%
350
-1%
462
31%
320
-9%
Brightness Distribution
87
96
10%
94
8%
85
-2%
89
2%
81
-7%
Black Level *
0.52
0.33
37%
0.21
60%
0.36
31%
0.23
56%
0.3
42%
Contrast
710
1630
130%
1986
180%
1067
50%
2122
199%
1173
65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
10.5
5.7
46%
11.9
-13%
6
43%
5
52%
8.7
17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
13.9
4.7
66%
14.4
-4%
5.9
58%
4.8
65%
10.5
24%
Gamma
2.51 96%
2.51 96%
2.19 110%
2 120%
2.4 100%
2.04 118%
CCT
12118 54%
7264 89%
12820 51%
8042 81%
7427 88%
8529 76%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2688 Hz1 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2688 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2688 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5901 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms Incremento
↘ 12.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.8 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms Incremento
↘ 19.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43 ms).
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
2688 Points ∼17%
LG K10 2017
2311 Points ∼14% -14%
Oukitel U16 Max
2505 Points ∼15% -7%
Sony Xperia E5
1527 Points ∼9% -43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
618 Points ∼13%
LG K10 2017
593 Points ∼12% -4%
Oukitel U16 Max
653 Points ∼13% +6%
Sony Xperia E5
556 Points ∼11% -10%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
44842 Points ∼20%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
37286 Points ∼16% -17%
Blackview R6
38038 Points ∼17% -15%
Doogee Shoot 1
39275 Points ∼17% -12%
LG K10 2017
39063 Points ∼17% -13%
Oukitel U16 Max
38295 Points ∼17% -15%
Honor 6X
56764 Points ∼25% +27%
Sony Xperia E5
32477 Points ∼14% -28%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
1143 Points ∼38%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
1076 Points ∼36% -6%
Blackview R6
814 Points ∼27% -29%
Doogee Shoot 1
852 Points ∼28% -25%
LG K10 2017
1047 Points ∼35% -8%
Oukitel U16 Max
1104 Points ∼36% -3%
Honor 6X
1440 Points ∼48% +26%
Sony Xperia E5
835 Points ∼28% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
323 Points ∼6%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
160 Points ∼3% -50%
Blackview R6
138 Points ∼3% -57%
Doogee Shoot 1
141 Points ∼3% -56%
LG K10 2017
252 Points ∼5% -22%
Oukitel U16 Max
169 Points ∼3% -48%
Honor 6X
318 Points ∼6% -2%
Sony Xperia E5
100 Points ∼2% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
384 Points ∼10%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
197 Points ∼5% -49%
Blackview R6
169 Points ∼4% -56%
Doogee Shoot 1
173 Points ∼4% -55%
LG K10 2017
303 Points ∼8% -21%
Oukitel U16 Max
208 Points ∼5% -46%
Honor 6X
385 Points ∼10% 0%
Sony Xperia E5
124 Points ∼3% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
1146 Points ∼38%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
1090 Points ∼36% -5%
Blackview R6
762 Points ∼25% -34%
Doogee Shoot 1
874 Points ∼29% -24%
LG K10 2017
1105 Points ∼37% -4%
Oukitel U16 Max
1098 Points ∼36% -4%
Honor 6X
1433 Points ∼48% +25%
Sony Xperia E5
817 Points ∼27% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
478 Points ∼6%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
241 Points ∼3% -50%
Blackview R6
217 Points ∼3% -55%
Doogee Shoot 1
218 Points ∼3% -54%
LG K10 2017
380 Points ∼5% -21%
Oukitel U16 Max
248 Points ∼3% -48%
Honor 6X
468 Points ∼6% -2%
Sony Xperia E5
175 Points ∼2% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
549 Points ∼11%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
291 Points ∼6% -47%
Blackview R6
258 Points ∼5% -53%
Doogee Shoot 1
282 Points ∼6% -49%
LG K10 2017
445 Points ∼9% -19%
Oukitel U16 Max
300 Points ∼6% -45%
Honor 6X
550 Points ∼11% 0%
Sony Xperia E5
212 Points ∼4% -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
9959 Points ∼14%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
10347 Points ∼15% +4%
Blackview R6
7424 Points ∼11% -25%
Doogee Shoot 1
9525 Points ∼14% -4%
LG K10 2017
8223 Points ∼12% -17%
Oukitel U16 Max
10549 Points ∼15% +6%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼20% +36%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼20% +36%
Sony Xperia E5
9349 Points ∼14% -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
10361 Points ∼2%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
6456 Points ∼1% -38%
Blackview R6
5380 Points ∼1% -48%
Doogee Shoot 1
6115 Points ∼1% -41%
LG K10 2017
7936 Points ∼2% -23%
Oukitel U16 Max
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +10%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +10%
Sony Xperia E5
4615 Points ∼1% -55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
10269 Points ∼5%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
7045 Points ∼4% -31%
Blackview R6
5731 Points ∼3% -44%
Doogee Shoot 1
6645 Points ∼3% -35%
LG K10 2017
7998 Points ∼4% -22%
Oukitel U16 Max
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +15%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +15%
Sony Xperia E5
5200 Points ∼3% -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
17 fps ∼1%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
12 fps ∼1% -29%
Blackview R6
9.8 fps ∼1% -42%
Doogee Shoot 1
11 fps ∼1% -35%
LG K10 2017
13 fps ∼1% -24%
Oukitel U16 Max
12 fps ∼1% -29%
Honor 6X
18 fps ∼1% +6%
Sony Xperia E5
8.4 fps ∼1% -51%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
16 fps ∼3%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
13 fps ∼3% -19%
Blackview R6
9.7 fps ∼2% -39%
Doogee Shoot 1
11 fps ∼2% -31%
LG K10 2017
22 fps ∼5% +38%
Oukitel U16 Max
20 fps ∼4% +25%
Honor 6X
19 fps ∼4% +19%
Sony Xperia E5
15 fps ∼3% -6%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
6.8 fps ∼1%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
4.5 fps ∼1% -34%
Blackview R6
4 fps ∼1% -41%
Doogee Shoot 1
4 fps ∼1% -41%
LG K10 2017
5.3 fps ∼1% -22%
Oukitel U16 Max
2.9 fps ∼1% -57%
Honor 6X
4.6 fps ∼1% -32%
Sony Xperia E5
3 fps ∼1% -56%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
6.8 fps ∼2%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
4.7 fps ∼1% -31%
Blackview R6
4 fps ∼1% -41%
Doogee Shoot 1
4 fps ∼1% -41%
LG K10 2017
11 fps ∼3% +62%
Oukitel U16 Max
9.2 fps ∼3% +35%
Honor 6X
8.5 fps ∼2% +25%
Sony Xperia E5
6 fps ∼2% -12%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
4.6 fps ∼1%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
3.1 fps ∼1% -33%
Blackview R6
2.5 fps ∼1% -46%
Doogee Shoot 1
2.6 fps ∼1% -43%
LG K10 2017
3.5 fps ∼1% -24%
Oukitel U16 Max
2.9 fps ∼1% -37%
Honor 6X
2.5 fps ∼1% -46%
Sony Xperia E5
1.9 fps ∼0% -59%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
4.5 fps ∼3%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
2.9 fps ∼2% -36%
Blackview R6
2.6 fps ∼1% -42%
Doogee Shoot 1
2.6 fps ∼1% -42%
LG K10 2017
8.6 fps ∼5% +91%
Oukitel U16 Max
6.5 fps ∼4% +44%
Honor 6X
4.9 fps ∼3% +9%
Sony Xperia E5
3.4 fps ∼2% -24%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
2.4 fps ∼1%
LG K10 2017
1.9 fps ∼1% -21%
Honor 6X
2.8 fps ∼1% +17%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
2.4 fps ∼0%
LG K10 2017
4.3 fps ∼0% +79%
Honor 6X
3 fps ∼0% +25%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
3132 Points ∼46%
Doogee Shoot 1
2249 Points ∼33% -28%
LG K10 2017
3167 Points ∼46% +1%
Oukitel U16 Max
3042 Points ∼45% -3%
Sony Xperia E5
2785 Points ∼41% -11%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
4280 Points ∼52%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
2979 Points ∼36% -30%
Blackview R6
2759 Points ∼33% -36%
Doogee Shoot 1
3653 Points ∼44% -15%
Oukitel U16 Max
4040 Points ∼49% -6%
Honor 6X
4383 Points ∼53% +2%
Sony Xperia E5
3817 Points ∼46% -11%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
10 Points ∼1%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
9 Points ∼1% -10%
Blackview R6
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Doogee Shoot 1
10 Points ∼1% 0%
LG K10 2017
1137 Points ∼74% +11270%
Oukitel U16 Max
633 Points ∼41% +6230%
Honor 6X
720 Points ∼47% +7100%
Sony Xperia E5
639 Points ∼41% +6290%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
637 Points ∼7%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
428 Points ∼5% -33%
Blackview R6
383 Points ∼4% -40%
Doogee Shoot 1
383 Points ∼4% -40%
LG K10 2017
508 Points ∼6% -20%
Oukitel U16 Max
433 Points ∼5% -32%
Honor 6X
819 Points ∼10% +29%
Sony Xperia E5
280 Points ∼3% -56%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
887 Points ∼20%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
797 Points ∼18% -10%
Blackview R6
472 Points ∼11% -47%
Doogee Shoot 1
558 Points ∼13% -37%
LG K10 2017
623 Points ∼14% -30%
Oukitel U16 Max
781 Points ∼18% -12%
Honor 6X
1779 Points ∼40% +101%
Sony Xperia E5
552 Points ∼12% -38%
System (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
1992 Points ∼30%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
1702 Points ∼26% -15%
Blackview R6
562 Points ∼9% -72%
Doogee Shoot 1
1164 Points ∼18% -42%
LG K10 2017
1259 Points ∼19% -37%
Oukitel U16 Max
1776 Points ∼27% -11%
Honor 6X
2721 Points ∼41% +37%
Sony Xperia E5
1091 Points ∼17% -45%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
323 Points ∼9%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
272 Points ∼7% -16%
Blackview R6
177 Points ∼5% -45%
Doogee Shoot 1
221 Points ∼6% -32%
LG K10 2017
821 Points ∼22% +154%
Oukitel U16 Max
785 Points ∼21% +143%
Honor 6X
1300 Points ∼34% +302%
Sony Xperia E5
567 Points ∼15% +76%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
3066 Points ∼6%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
2892 Points ∼6% -6%
Blackview R6
3195 Points ∼6% +4%
Doogee Shoot 1
3389 Points ∼7% +11%
LG K10 2017
3407 Points ∼7% +11%
Oukitel U16 Max
2734 Points ∼6% -11%
Honor 6X
4199 Points ∼8% +37%
Sony Xperia E5
2910 Points ∼6% -5%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
22626.8 ms * ∼38%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
14218 ms * ∼24% +37%
Blackview R6
11226.6 ms * ∼19% +50%
Doogee Shoot 1
11057.6 ms * ∼19% +51%
LG K10 2017
11708.2 ms * ∼20% +48%
Oukitel U16 Max
21898.5 ms * ∼37% +3%
Honor 6X
9373.3 ms * ∼16% +59%
Sony Xperia E5
13232.4 ms * ∼22% +42%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
20.2 Points ∼6%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
18.049 Points ∼5% -11%
Blackview R6
21.904 Points ∼7% +8%
Doogee Shoot 1
20.784 Points ∼6% +3%
LG K10 2017
20.838 Points ∼6% +3%
Oukitel U16 Max
16.722 Points ∼5% -17%
Honor 6X
26.464 Points ∼8% +31%
Sony Xperia E5
17.885 Points ∼5% -11%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
49.21 MB/s ∼56%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
27.97 MB/s ∼32% -43%
Blackview R6
9.34 MB/s ∼11% -81%
Doogee Shoot 1
20 MB/s ∼23% -59%
LG K10 2017
61.63 MB/s ∼71% +25%
Oukitel U16 Max
24.56 MB/s ∼28% -50%
Honor 6X
34.53 MB/s ∼40% -30%
Sony Xperia E5
45.56 MB/s ∼52% -7%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
72.15 MB/s ∼75%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
42.76 MB/s ∼44% -41%
Blackview R6
22.74 MB/s ∼24% -68%
Doogee Shoot 1
29.18 MB/s ∼30% -60%
LG K10 2017
77.4 MB/s ∼80% +7%
Oukitel U16 Max
36.27 MB/s ∼38% -50%
Honor 6X
52.02 MB/s ∼54% -28%
Sony Xperia E5
65.03 MB/s ∼67% -10%
Random Write 4KB (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
9.44 MB/s ∼6%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
10.4 MB/s ∼7% +10%
Blackview R6
13.5 MB/s ∼9% +43%
Doogee Shoot 1
7.32 MB/s ∼5% -22%
LG K10 2017
10.8 MB/s ∼7% +14%
Oukitel U16 Max
11.24 MB/s ∼7% +19%
Honor 6X
45.05 MB/s ∼30% +377%
Sony Xperia E5
9.84 MB/s ∼6% +4%
Random Read 4KB (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
64.59 MB/s ∼37%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
22.2 MB/s ∼13% -66%
Blackview R6
18.73 MB/s ∼11% -71%
Doogee Shoot 1
18.99 MB/s ∼11% -71%
LG K10 2017
25.1 MB/s ∼15% -61%
Oukitel U16 Max
18.5 MB/s ∼11% -71%
Honor 6X
39.55 MB/s ∼23% -39%
Sony Xperia E5
26.04 MB/s ∼15% -60%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
190.35 MB/s ∼92%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
70.1 MB/s ∼34% -63%
Blackview R6
76.11 MB/s ∼37% -60%
Doogee Shoot 1
47.49 MB/s ∼23% -75%
LG K10 2017
43.6 MB/s ∼21% -77%
Oukitel U16 Max
69.9 MB/s ∼34% -63%
Honor 6X
73.85 MB/s ∼36% -61%
Sony Xperia E5
83.09 MB/s ∼40% -56%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordina per valore)
Oukitel K6000 Plus
278.56 MB/s ∼35%
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
209.4 MB/s ∼26% -25%
Blackview R6
228 MB/s ∼29% -18%
Doogee Shoot 1
207.66 MB/s ∼26% -25%
LG K10 2017
246.1 MB/s ∼31% -12%
Oukitel U16 Max
231.05 MB/s ∼29% -17%
Honor 6X
283.37 MB/s ∼36% +2%
Sony Xperia E5
209.69 MB/s ∼26% -25%

Legenda

 
Oukitel K6000 Plus Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R6 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Doogee Shoot 1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC550KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Adreno 405,
 
LG K10 2017 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel U16 Max Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia E5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico massimo
 43.5 °C43.1 °C41.2 °C 
 45 °C42.5 °C40.1 °C 
 42.4 °C41.9 °C38.9 °C 
Massima: 45 °C
Media: 42.1 °C
36.1 °C39.8 °C41.3 °C
38.2 °C39.7 °C40.6 °C
38.4 °C39.8 °C40.6 °C
Massima: 41.3 °C
Media: 39.4 °C
Alimentazione (max)  33.9 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.42525.437.43125.330.34032.929.65033.625.76331.628.18028.4331002733.812520.832.71602232.420021.327.425020.828.331521.237.140019.446.850019.554.163017.759.380017.962.2100017.868.1125017.374.9160017.474.4200016.773.7250017.271.8315018.271.3400017.969.9500017.663.5630017.755.3800017.847.41000017.943.91250018.137.41600018.228.3SPL3081.3N1.342.1median 17.9Oukitel K6000 Plusmedian 54.1Delta1.317.931.635.725.433.325.332.132.926.433.626.231.633.328.430.52734.320.832.62231.521.336.620.841.721.244.619.449.719.554.817.761.417.966.117.865.917.366.917.463.616.758.617.263.318.265.917.969.117.669.217.764.717.858.517.952.918.140.218.229.53076.51.337.3median 17.9Sony Xperia E5median 58.51.312.831.64525.440.625.334.932.931.833.632.831.632.528.428.2272820.828.82227.821.325.520.826.621.226.619.436.219.543.317.750.417.957.417.864.817.371.917.475.316.776.717.276.518.273.717.97217.668.317.766.917.869.917.967.318.160.218.254.73084.31.348.9median 17.9LG K10 2017median 60.21.317.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Oukitel K6000 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia E5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

LG K10 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.34 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.32 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.88 / 2.02 / 2.09 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 5.33 / 7.74 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oukitel K6000 Plus
6080 mAh
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
4080 mAh
Blackview R6
3000 mAh
Blackview P2
6000 mAh
Doogee Shoot 1
3300 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Power Consumption
24%
1%
8%
31%
17%
Idle Minimum *
0.88
0.48
45%
0.78
11%
0.99
-13%
0.73
17%
0.82
7%
Idle Average *
2.02
1.55
23%
1.63
19%
2.04
-1%
1.48
27%
2
1%
Idle Maximum *
2.09
1.61
23%
1.84
12%
2.12
-1%
1.58
24%
2.03
3%
Load Average *
5.33
5.2
2%
7.47
-40%
3.77
29%
3.11
42%
3.34
37%
Load Maximum *
7.74
5.68
27%
7.47
3%
5.78
25%
4.37
44%
4.92
36%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
14ore 21minuti
Oukitel K6000 Plus
6080 mAh
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus
4080 mAh
Blackview R6
3000 mAh
Blackview P2
6000 mAh
Doogee Shoot 1
3300 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
26%
-30%
26%
-42%
11%
Reader / Idle
1957
2250
WiFi v1.3
861
1087
26%
604
-30%
1083
26%
501
-42%
957
11%
Load
351
203
563
375
H.264
885

Pro

+ schermo grande
+ scanner impronte digitali
+ ampia memoria di lavoro (4 GB)
+ molto spazio interno (circa 54 GB liberi)
+ dual-SIM
+ buona autonomia
+ tecnologia di ricarica rapida
+ aspetto high-quality
+ Android 7
+ software intelligente per utilizzarlo con una sola mano
+ opzioni manuali di impostazione fotocamera
+ USB OTG
+ radio FM
+ GPS con prestazioni decenti
+ Protezione case e schermo incluse

Contro

- Pesante
- cassa scarsa
- esposizione fotocamera insufficiente con poca luce
- manca una porta USB-C
- manca l'NFC
Recensione: Oukitel K6000 Plus. Modello fornito da Oukitel.

L'Oukitel K6000 è uno smartphone che si fa notare. La cover posteriore in alluminio e i colori sono il principale motivo di ciò. Non dovete farvi ingannare dalla grande batteria; l'autonomia è importante - ma non supera quella di dispositivi concorrenti. Inoltre, la batteria è il principale motivo del fatto che il K6000 Plus è pesante per essere un 5.5" superando i 200 grammi. Le performance pratiche restano dietro ai buoni risultati dei benchmarks.

Il K6000 Plus ha l'ultimo Android 7. Gli extras che Oukitel aggiunge per accedere velocemente e rendere facile l'utilizzo, rendono il K6000 Plus adatto alle operazioni quotidiane e questo è confermato non solo dalla configurazione della memoria. Tuttavia, pecca riguardo le immagini e il suono. Sebbene la fotocamera realizzi buone foto alla luce del sole nonostante l'assenza di definizione, con poca luce è utilizzabile solo usando il LED. Il suono va anche peggio: coloro che vogliono ascoltare musica o vedere videos senza cuffie dovrebbero cercare altrove.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Oukitel K6000 Plus - 06/28/2017 v6
Inge Schwabe

Chassis
85%
Tastiera
66 / 75 → 88%
Dispositivo di puntamento
79%
Connettività
39 / 60 → 65%
Peso
88%
Batteria
97%
Display
76%
Prestazioni di gioco
20 / 63 → 32%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
37 / 70 → 52%
Temperatura
85%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
49 / 91 → 54%
Fotocamera
53%
Media
67%
77%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione Breve dello Smartphone Oukitel K6000 Plus
Inge Schwabe, 2017-07-15 (Update: 2017-07-15)