Notebookcheck

Hands-On Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano Desktop

Il Nano Desktop di Zotac riceve un upgrade Comet Lake. Mentre la nuova CPU offre un piccolo aumento delle prestazioni, la grafica stagnante lascerà alcuni utenti dietro le più potenti CPU Tiger Lake e le APU Ryzen. Tuttavia, se un piccolo ingombro è necessario, lo ZBOX Nano è un'opzione decente per l'uso a casa e in ufficio.
Sam Medley, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzione a cura di Giuliano De Luca), 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 ...
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Processore
Intel Core i5-10210U 4 x 1.6 - 4.2 GHz, 15 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL2 / Sustained, Comet Lake-U
Scheda grafica
Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 1024 MB, Core: 1100 MHz, Memoria: 1333 MHz, Intel UHD Graphics Driver 27.20.100.7990
Memoria
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666 / PC4-21300
Scheda madre
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Harddisk
Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC, 500 GB 
Scheda audio
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Comet Lake PCH-LP - cAVS
Porte di connessione
7 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: headphone jack, microphone jack, Lettore schede: 3-in-1 (SD/SDHC/SDXC)
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless AC 9462 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5)
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 51 x 128 x 126
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Altre caratteristiche
12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
472 gr, Alimentazione: 326 gr
Prezzo
500 USD
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Punteggio
Data
Modello
Peso
Altezza
Dimensione
Risoluzione
Miglior Prezzo
10/2020
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620
472 gr51 mmx
02/2020
Intel NUC10i7FNH
i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620
697 gr51 mm0.00"0x0
02/2020
Intel NUC10i5FNK
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620
493 gr36 mm0.00"0x0
11/2018
Intel NUC8i7BE
i7-8559U, Iris Plus Graphics 655
683 gr51 mmx
08/2020
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
R5 3550H, Vega 8
843 gr39 mmx
12/2019
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620
499 gr22 mm0.00"x

Confronto Dimensioni

168 mm 120 mm 39 mm 843 g179 mm 88 mm 22 mm 499 g128 mm 126 mm 51 mm 472 g117 mm 112 mm 51 mm 697 g115 mm 111 mm 51 mm 683 g117 mm 112 mm 36 mm 493 g

Connessioni

Davanti: Pulsante di accensione, lettore di schede SD, jack per cuffie, jack per microfono, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) Tipo-C, 1x USB 3.0 (5 Gbps) Tipo-A
Davanti: Pulsante di accensione, lettore di schede SD, jack per cuffie, jack per microfono, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) Tipo-C, 1x USB 3.0 (5 Gbps) Tipo-A
Posteriore: Collegamento antenna WiFi, 2x Gigabit Ethernet, 4x USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) Tipo A, DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI 2.0, DC in
Posteriore: Collegamento antenna WiFi, 2x Gigabit Ethernet, 4x USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) Tipo A, DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI 2.0, DC in
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Intel NUC8i7BE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
69 MB/s ∼100% +77%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
66.9 MB/s ∼97% +72%
Media della classe Desktop
  (18.6 - 197, n=15)
57.4 MB/s ∼83% +47%
GMK NucBox K1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-)
47.1 MB/s ∼68% +21%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
38.94 MB/s ∼56%
Zotac ZBOX-CI660 Nano
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
35 MB/s ∼51% -10%
Chuwi GBox CWI560
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
18.7 MB/s ∼27% -52%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M920z
 
18.61 MB/s ∼27% -52%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
85.4 MB/s ∼100% +103%
Intel NUC8i7BE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
85.02 MB/s ∼100% +102%
GMK NucBox K1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-)
84.3 MB/s ∼99% +101%
Media della classe Desktop
  (20.1 - 223, n=15)
66.5 MB/s ∼78% +58%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
42 MB/s ∼49%
Zotac ZBOX-CI660 Nano
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.73 MB/s ∼44% -10%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M920z
 
30.7 MB/s ∼36% -27%
Chuwi GBox CWI560
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
20.8 MB/s ∼24% -50%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810Tooltip
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø514 (504.41-521.83)
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø755 (749.68-790.62)
Intel NUC8i7BE Intel Core i7-8559U, Intel Core i7-8559U: Ø665 (657.41-808.08)
Intel NUC8i7BE Intel Core i7-8559U, Intel Core i7-8559U: Ø681 (671.37-798.44)
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H: Ø649 (494.25-672.07)
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø513 (491.14-523.79)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel Core i7-10710U
480 Points ∼100% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
475 Points ∼99% +14%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
466 Points ∼97% +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
447 Points ∼93% +7%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
444 Points ∼93% +6%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
428 Points ∼89% +2%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
418 Points ∼87%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (322 - 428, n=27)
409 Points ∼85% -2%
LG Gram 15Z90N
Intel Core i5-1035G7
380 Points ∼79% -9%
Media della classe Desktop
  (156 - 501, n=17)
354 Points ∼74% -15%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
347 Points ∼72% -17%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
Intel Celeron J4115
156 Points ∼33% -63%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
2935 Points ∼100% +148%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
2401 Points ∼82% +103%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel Core i7-10710U
2303 Points ∼78% +95%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
1820 Points ∼62% +54%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
1691 Points ∼58% +43%
Media della classe Desktop
  (304 - 5196, n=17)
1647 Points ∼56% +39%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1583 Points ∼54% +34%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
1516 Points ∼52% +28%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (771 - 1820, n=27)
1282 Points ∼44% +8%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
1183 Points ∼40%
LG Gram 15Z90N
Intel Core i5-1035G7
1043 Points ∼36% -12%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
Intel Celeron J4115
590 Points ∼20% -50%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel Core i7-10710U
194 Points ∼100% +16%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
188 Points ∼97% +13%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
180 Points ∼93% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
184 Points ∼95% +10%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
182 Points ∼94% +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
174 Points ∼90% +4%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M920z
Intel Core i5-8500
172 Points ∼89% +3%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
168 Points ∼87% +1%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
167 Points ∼86%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (154 - 174, n=32)
167 Points ∼86% 0%
LG Gram 15Z90N
Intel Core i5-1035G7
153 Points ∼79% -8%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano
Intel Core i5-8265U
148 Points ∼76% -11%
Media della classe Desktop
  (68 - 218, n=41)
148 Points ∼76% -11%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
146 Points ∼75% -13%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
Intel Celeron J4115
71.1 Points ∼37% -57%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
1287 (1057.08min - 1287.21max) Points ∼100% +147%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel Core i7-10710U
1067 Points ∼83% +104%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
973 Points ∼76% +86%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M920z
Intel Core i5-8500
950 Points ∼74% +82%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
808 Points ∼63% +55%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
798 (671.37min - 798.44max) Points ∼62% +53%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
790 Points ∼61% +51%
Media della classe Desktop
  (188 - 2302, n=43)
731 Points ∼57% +40%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
672 (494.25min - 672.07max) Points ∼52% +29%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
658 (598.31min - 772.22max) Points ∼51% +26%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (478 - 790, n=32)
611 Points ∼47% +17%
LG Gram 15Z90N
Intel Core i5-1035G7
539 Points ∼42% +3%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano
Intel Core i5-8265U
524 Points ∼41% 0%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
522 (504.41min - 521.83max) Points ∼41%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
Intel Celeron J4115
263 (207.57min - 262.65max) Points ∼20% -50%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
Intel Celeron J4115
2380 Seconds * ∼100% -167%
LG Gram 15Z90N
Intel Core i5-1035G7
1074.6 Seconds * ∼45% -20%
Media della classe Desktop
  (208 - 3527, n=18)
1022 Seconds * ∼43% -15%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
892 Seconds * ∼37%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (585 - 1339, n=21)
854 Seconds * ∼36% +4%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
695 Seconds * ∼29% +22%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
682 Seconds * ∼29% +24%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
650 Seconds * ∼27% +27%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
670 Seconds * ∼28% +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
593.4 Seconds * ∼25% +33%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
584.9 Seconds * ∼25% +34%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M920z
Intel Core i5-8500
494.76 Seconds * ∼21% +45%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel Core i7-10710U
468.3 Seconds * ∼20% +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
403 Seconds * ∼17% +55%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
6171 MIPS ∼100% +43%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
4826 MIPS ∼78% +12%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
4794 MIPS ∼78% +11%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel Core i7-10710U
4727 MIPS ∼77% +10%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M920z
Intel Core i5-8500
4513 MIPS ∼73% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
4438 MIPS ∼72% +3%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
4303 MIPS ∼70%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
4288 MIPS ∼69% 0%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
4253 MIPS ∼69% -1%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (3504 - 4467, n=21)
4204 MIPS ∼68% -2%
LG Gram 15Z90N
Intel Core i5-1035G7
4091 MIPS ∼66% -5%
Media della classe Desktop
  (2132 - 6171, n=19)
3913 MIPS ∼63% -9%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
3543 MIPS ∼57% -18%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
Intel Celeron J4115
2215 MIPS ∼36% -49%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
37081 MIPS ∼100% +118%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
30570 MIPS ∼82% +80%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
22033 MIPS ∼59% +30%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel Core i7-10710U
29948 MIPS ∼81% +76%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
23610 MIPS ∼64% +39%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M920z
Intel Core i5-8500
23200 MIPS ∼63% +37%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
21925 MIPS ∼59% +29%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
21679 MIPS ∼58% +28%
Media della classe Desktop
  (6040 - 60747, n=19)
20428 MIPS ∼55% +20%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
16971 MIPS ∼46%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (10950 - 21679, n=21)
16740 MIPS ∼45% -1%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
16683 MIPS ∼45% -2%
LG Gram 15Z90N
Intel Core i5-1035G7
13921 MIPS ∼38% -18%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
Intel Celeron J4115
8098 MIPS ∼22% -52%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
1274 Points ∼100% +15%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel Core i7-10710U
1229 Points ∼96% +11%
LG Gram 15Z90N
Intel Core i5-1035G7
1163 Points ∼91% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
1157 Points ∼91% +4%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
1111 Points ∼87%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
1099 Points ∼86% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
1098 Points ∼86% -1%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (1014 - 1133, n=22)
1079 Points ∼85% -3%
Media della classe Desktop
  (388 - 1745, n=14)
960 Points ∼75% -14%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
903 Points ∼71% -19%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
723 Points ∼57% -35%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
Intel Celeron J4115
388 Points ∼30% -65%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel Core i7-10710U
5839 Points ∼100% +51%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
5600 Points ∼96% +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
4646 Points ∼80% +20%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
3939 Points ∼67% +2%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
3877 Points ∼66%
Media della classe Desktop
  (1353 - 10244, n=14)
3814 Points ∼65% -2%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
3671 Points ∼63% -5%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
3660 Points ∼63% -6%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (2079 - 4256, n=22)
3570 Points ∼61% -8%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
3203 Points ∼55% -17%
LG Gram 15Z90N
Intel Core i5-1035G7
2713 Points ∼46% -30%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
Intel Celeron J4115
1410 Points ∼24% -64%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
8.33 fps ∼100% +101%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel Core i7-10710U
7.95 fps ∼95% +92%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M920z
Intel Core i5-8500
7.86 fps ∼94% +89%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
6.72 fps ∼81% +62%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
6.28 fps ∼75% +51%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
5.9 fps ∼71% +42%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
5.523 fps ∼66% +33%
Media della classe Desktop
  (0.65 - 16.8, n=21)
5.24 fps ∼63% +26%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
5.16 fps ∼62% +24%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (2.66 - 6.28, n=21)
4.28 fps ∼51% +3%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
4.15 fps ∼50%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
4.1 fps ∼49% -1%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
Intel Celeron J4115
1.49 fps ∼18% -64%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
Intel Celeron J4115
150 s * ∼100% -118%
Media della classe Desktop
  (55.8 - 367, n=10)
110 s * ∼73% -60%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
74.9 s * ∼50% -9%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
68.8 s * ∼46%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
67.8 s * ∼45% +1%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (49.6 - 80.3, n=15)
60.3 s * ∼40% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
58.4 s * ∼39% +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
58.19 s * ∼39% +15%
LG Gram 15Z90N
Intel Core i5-1035G7
32.26 s * ∼22% +53%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Media della classe Desktop
  (0.548 - 1.885, n=14)
0.944 sec * ∼100% -36%
LG Gram 15Z90N
Intel Core i5-1035G7
0.811 sec * ∼86% -17%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
0.737 sec * ∼78% -6%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U
  (0.658 - 0.901, n=21)
0.729 sec * ∼77% -5%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
0.72 sec * ∼76% -4%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Intel Core i5-10210U
0.695 sec * ∼74%
HP EliteBook 830 G7
Intel Core i7-10810U
0.651 sec * ∼69% +6%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel Core i7-10710U
0.649 sec * ∼69% +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
0.639 sec * ∼68% +8%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Core i7-8559U
0.6275 sec * ∼66% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
0.613 sec * ∼65% +12%
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
522 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
53.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
167 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Intel NUC8i7BE
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i7-8559U
4007 Points ∼26% +34%
Media della classe Desktop
  (972 - 11987, n=29)
3988 Points ∼26% +33%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
Vega 8, R5 3550H, Silicon Motion AZW 512G NV428
3835 Points ∼25% +28%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
3777 Points ∼24% +26%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
3296 Points ∼21% +10%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2487 - 4463, n=27)
3086 Points ∼20% +3%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC
3000 Points ∼19%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
2917 Points ∼19% -3%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron J4115, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1110 Points ∼7% -63%
Productivity
Intel NUC8i7BE
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i7-8559U
7236 Points ∼65% +14%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
6876 Points ∼62% +9%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5990 - 7317, n=27)
6688 Points ∼60% +6%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
6494 Points ∼58% +3%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
Vega 8, R5 3550H, Silicon Motion AZW 512G NV428
6420 Points ∼58% +1%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6337 Points ∼57% 0%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC
6333 Points ∼57%
Media della classe Desktop
  (2883 - 8515, n=29)
6124 Points ∼55% -3%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron J4115, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2969 Points ∼27% -53%
Essentials
Intel NUC10i7FNH
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
9013 Points ∼79% +16%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i7-8559U
8994 Points ∼79% +16%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
Vega 8, R5 3550H, Silicon Motion AZW 512G NV428
8575 Points ∼75% +10%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8551 Points ∼75% +10%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7172 - 10000, n=27)
8512 Points ∼74% +9%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
8235 Points ∼72% +6%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC
7787 Points ∼68%
Media della classe Desktop
  (4418 - 10598, n=29)
7776 Points ∼68% 0%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron J4115, 128 GB eMMC Flash
4837 Points ∼42% -38%
Score
Intel NUC8i7BE
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i7-8559U
4580 Points ∼52% +21%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
4418 Points ∼50% +17%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
Vega 8, R5 3550H, Silicon Motion AZW 512G NV428
4269 Points ∼49% +13%
Media della classe Desktop
  (1658 - 7329, n=29)
4035 Points ∼46% +6%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
4019 Points ∼46% +6%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3686 - 4353, n=27)
4008 Points ∼46% +6%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3876 Points ∼44% +2%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC
3791 Points ∼43%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron J4115, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1803 Points ∼21% -52%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Intel NUC8i7BE
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i7-8559U
4674 Points ∼75% +35%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
3938 Points ∼64% +14%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
Vega 8, R5 3550H, Silicon Motion AZW 512G NV428
3755 Points ∼61% +9%
Media della classe Desktop
  (1928 - 5418, n=31)
3725 Points ∼60% +8%
Media Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3182 - 4284, n=20)
3619 Points ∼58% +5%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
3526 Points ∼57% +2%
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC
3455 Points ∼56%
Chuwi LarkBox 4K Mini PC
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron J4115, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2036 Points ∼33% -41%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3455 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4879 punti
PCMark 10 Score
3791 punti
Aiuto
Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano
Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
Silicon Motion AZW 512G NV428
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Media Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
Write 4K
105.9
442.4
318%
58.43
-45%
161.9
53%
130
23%
106
0%
Read 4K
39.15
371.1
848%
30.24
-23%
52.76
35%
45.61
17%
39.2
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
320.5
373.8
17%
448.5
40%
285
-11%
365.3
14%
321
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
342.1
374.9
10%
391.4
14%
324
-5%
350.2
2%
342
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
513.7
893
74%
914.4
78%
1578.8
207%
2985.9
481%
514
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
554.3
1581.5
185%
1583
186%
2017.9
264%
3564.9
543%
554
0%
Write 4K Q8T8
330.8
399.1
21%
402.3
22%
529.6
60%
368.7
11%
331
0%
Read 4K Q8T8
391.8
687.9
76%
679.8
74%
738.1
88%
789.7
102%
392
0%
AS SSD
Copy Game MB/s
248.87
734.57
195%
471.17
89%
658.13
164%
249
0%
Copy Program MB/s
191.93
346.04
80%
328.85
71%
261.71
36%
192
0%
Copy ISO MB/s
482.52
976.28
102%
576.38
19%
1228.29
155%
483
0%
Score Total
1023
1944
90%
1955
91%
2377
132%
2716
165%
1023
0%
Score Write
324
762
135%
765
136%
1054
225%
1305
303%
324
0%
Score Read
457
804
76%
808
77%
869
90%
942
106%
457
0%
Access Time Write *
0.095
0.07
26%
0.07
26%
0.114
-20%
0.032
66%
0.095
-0%
Access Time Read *
0.103
0.114
-11%
0.11
-7%
0.063
39%
0.039
62%
0.103
-0%
4K-64 Write
193.74
647.56
234%
641.66
231%
813.84
320%
1073.77
454%
194
0%
4K-64 Read
369.37
651.73
76%
650.04
76%
695.76
88%
726.4
97%
369
0%
4K Write
88.54
53.52
-40%
61.35
-31%
98.55
11%
116.47
32%
88.5
0%
4K Read
36.75
21.53
-41%
26.44
-28%
35.27
-4%
48.46
32%
36.8
0%
Seq Write
413.77
611
48%
616
49%
1413.39
242%
1150.28
178%
414
0%
Seq Read
506.95
1306
158%
1318
160%
1382.19
173%
1668.47
229%
507
0%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 554.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 513.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 342.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 320.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.15 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 105.9 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 330.8 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 391.8 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Media della classe Desktop
  (433 - 43404, n=33)
7471 Points ∼100% +506%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i5-1035G1
4457 Points ∼60% +262%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00
NVIDIA GeForce MX330, Intel Core i7-10510U
3581 Points ∼48% +191%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
3019 Points ∼40% +145%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
2876 Points ∼38% +133%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
2737 Points ∼37% +122%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i7-8559U
2260 Points ∼30% +83%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10710U
1418 Points ∼19% +15%
450
450
1232 Points ∼16%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
1202 Points ∼16% -2%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1183 Points ∼16% -4%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1420, n=202)
1152 Points ∼15% -6%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Media della classe Desktop
  (3366 - 182888, n=28)
26132 Points ∼100% +160%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i5-1035G1
24744 Points ∼95% +146%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
22904 Points ∼88% +128%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
22247 Points ∼85% +121%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
18901 Points ∼72% +88%
Intel NUC8i7BE
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i7-8559U
16698 Points ∼64% +66%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00
NVIDIA GeForce MX330, Intel Core i7-10510U
15595 Points ∼60% +55%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10710U
11065 Points ∼42% +10%
450
450
10057 Points ∼38%
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
9590 Points ∼37% -5%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=214)
9221 Points ∼35% -8%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
9113 Points ∼35% -9%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Media della classe Desktop
  (14600 - 435092, n=14)
118555 Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
93183 Points ∼79%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i5-1035G1
85655 Points ∼72%
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
69477 Points ∼59%
Intel NUC10i7FNH
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10710U
48446 Points ∼41%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (29002 - 59483, n=68)
43200 Points ∼36%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
40532 Points ∼34%
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8616 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1131 punti
Aiuto

Rumorosità

Idle
27.8 / 33.9 / 33.9 dB(A)
Sotto carico
43.7 / 43.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 27.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202727.625.927.42528.229.727.928.63128.331.529.829.54028.33125.828.45045.232.334456343.842.742.7448026.625.925.42910027.327.526.631.812538.538.638.240.916026.224.823.729.12002933.724.132.725048.2322647.831540.929.222.541.340026.622.219.32750033.324.715.629.863028.320.913.727.180028.520.212.629.210002718.812.727.1125027.220.312.527.2160033.623.812.733.7200033.323.912.533.4250027.317.812.227.6315022.914.911.823.9400021.716.712.122.3500022.719.712.422.8630018.616.811.918.8800015.914.512161000019.318.412.219.61250015.815.211.815.91600012.212.211.512.3SPL43.733.927.843.7N4.32.114.3median 27.2median 20.3median 12.6median 27.2Delta5.34.24.95.240.633.935.237.435.932.629.92931.832.235.133.934.834.635.228.522.426.324.729.125.822.625.82429.72524.633.732.430.726.421.821.525.726.427.421.121.61926.42522.620.919.627.526.822.52117.526.22722.618.91726.928.926.318.716.229.53027.818.616.529.532.327.318.614.732.333.327.918.113.734.135.229.820.313.535.537.832.323.312.63839.334.425.312.139.439.33320.312.239.241.834.319.812.241.441.835.119.512.742.144.334.917.912.644.24231.618.113.142.241.431.216.113.341.437.226.615.613.637.132.321.714.613.732.628.418.21513.728.523.716.915.413.723.519.62115.313.518.716.11814.513.415.751.943.931.525.4527.34.11.50.77.4median 32.3median 27.3median 18.6median 13.6median 32.66.25.31.91.36.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseZotac ZBOX MI642 NanoBeelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T
Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.46 / 0.47 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8.9 / 9 / 9.9 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 33 / 58 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Pro

+ case molto compatto
+ solido sistema di montaggio VESA
+ facile accesso alla RAM e alla memoria
+ prestazioni adeguate
+ silenzioso sotto carico leggero (lavoro d'ufficio, ecc.)
+ buona selezione delle porte

Contro

- Nessuna Thunderbolt 3
- la costruzione in plastica appare cheap
- supporta solo unità SATA, non NVMe
- prestazioni grafiche deboli
- nessun altoparlante interno

Giudizio Preliminare

Recensione del miniPC ZOTAC ZBOX MI642 Nano. Dispositivo fornito da ZOTAC.
Recensione del miniPC ZOTAC ZBOX MI642 Nano. Dispositivo fornito da ZOTAC.

Lo ZOTAC ZBOX MI642 Nano non è un dispositivo notevole, soprattutto per 500 dollari. Non batte alcun record stipando una potente GPU in un piccolo case. Non vanta alcuna caratteristica unica. A questo proposito, lo ZBOX MI642 Nano non riesce a distinguersi tra il crescente oceano di piccoli desktop.

In effetti, lo ZBOX MI642 Nano pecca in alcune aree chiave, in particolare le opzioni di archiviazione e la selezione delle porte. La mancanza del supporto NVMe spicca come un aspetto dolente, considerando che molti piccoli desktop supportano questo formato veloce. Inoltre, l'assenza di Thunderbolt limita fortemente l'adattabilità dello ZBOX MI642 Nano. 

Ciò che lo ZOTAC ZBOX MI642 Nano fa bene, tuttavia, è offrire prestazioni di calcolo affidabili. Il Core i5-10210U rimane costante, anche sotto carico intenso, il che lo rende una buona opzione per gli impiegati che hanno bisogno di una macchina stabile per più di 8 ore al giorno. Il suo ingombro compatto e il solido supporto VESA può essere interessante anche per gli utenti che vogliono nascondere la loro macchina ad occhi indiscreti.

Dobbiamo notare il problema che la nostra particolare unità ha incontrato durante il nostro stress test; durante l'esecuzione di Prime95, il dispositivo si è spento. Da allora non siamo stati in grado di avviare la macchina. È molto probabile che questo problema sia relegato alla nostra unità e non sia la causa di un problema diffuso, ma ci ha impedito di analizzare adeguatamente alcuni test (ad esempio, la latenza del DPC). 

La principale concorrenza dello ZBOX si è rivelata vincente in diversi settori. Per circa 150-200 dollari in più, il Beelink GT-R offre prestazioni della CPU leggermente migliori, una grafica decisamente migliore, e include 16 GB di RAM DDR4, un veloce SSD NVMe e un grande disco rigido SATA. Per lo stesso costo dello ZBOX MI642 Nano, il Frost Canyon NUC di Intel vanta la stessa CPU in un formato più piccolo e ha il supporto per un disco NVMe, anche se manca di alcune porte. 

Considerando il prezzo, lo ZOTAC ZBOX MI642 Nano offre prestazioni costanti della CPU in un case compatto. Tuttavia, è surclassato da molte altre opzioni di piccolo formato attualmente sul mercato.

Anche se non siamo stati in grado di testare alcune aree della nostra analisi a causa di un guasto del sistema, abbiamo in programma di ritestare lo ZOTAC ZBOX MI642 Nano una volta ricevuta un'unità sostitutiva.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Hands-On Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano Desktop
Sam Medley, 2020-10-20 (Update: 2020-10-20)
Sam Medley
Editor of the original article: Sam Medley - Review Editor - @samuel_medley