Notebookcheck

Recensione dello Smartphone Wiko View 3 Pro

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 06/16/2019

AI e tripla-fotocamera. Wiko sta cercando di abbassare significativamente il prezzo per gli smartphones con una configurazione a tripla fotocamera. Allo stesso tempo, si basa su molte funzioni AI, una grande quantità di memoria e un design accattivante. Nella nostra recensione mostreremo che altro offre il Wiko View 3 Pro per circa 300 euro (~$338).

Wiko View 3 Pro (View Serie)
Processore
Mediatek Helio P60
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memoria
6144 MB 
Schermo
6.3 pollici 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 116 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: Jack audio da 3.5 mm, Lettore schede: microSD (FAT, FAT32, fino a 512 GB), 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: accelerometro, giroscopio, sensore di prossimità, bussola digitale, USB Type-C
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G UMTS (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), 4G LTE (B1(2100)/B3(1800)/B5(850)/B7(2600)/B8(900)/B20(800)/B28(700)/B40(2300)) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.1 x 159.5 x 75
Batteria
4000 mAh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix 13MP (f/1.7, 120°) + 12MP (f/2.4, 1.25µm) + 5MP (f/2.2)
Fotocamera Secondaria: 16 MPix f/2.0
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: 1 cassa, Tastiera: onscreen, Adattatore di alimentazione USB, cavo USB Type-C, cuffia stereo, copertura in silicone, ago SIM, 24 Mesi Garanzia, Valore SAR (testa): 0,61 W/kg, valore SAR (corpo): 1,5 W/kg, senza ventola
Peso
184 gr, Alimentazione: 78 gr
Prezzo
300 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Wiko View 3 Pro
Wiko View 3 Pro
Wiko View 3 Pro
Wiko View 3 Pro
Wiko View 3 Pro

Confronto Dimensioni

159.5 mm 75 mm 8.1 mm 184 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g155.2 mm 73.4 mm 8 mm 160 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g153 mm 72 mm 8.3 mm 164 g150.7 mm 72.3 mm 8.3 mm 163 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (min: 267, max: 343) MBit/s ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
BQ Aquaris X2
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
275 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=424)
223 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
167 (min: 108, max: 214) MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
43 MBit/s ∼13% -87%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X2
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
322 (min: 275) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
308 (min: 302, max: 312) MBit/s ∼96%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼93% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼84% -12%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼79% -18%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
221 (min: 157, max: 243) MBit/s ∼69% -28%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=424)
213 MBit/s ∼66% -31%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
47.6 MBit/s ∼15% -85%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø330 (267-343)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø308 (302-312)
GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Wiko View 3 Pro
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
Wiko View 3 Pro - Grafico di Test
Wiko View 3 Pro - Grafico di Test
Wiko View 3 Pro - Grafico di Test (dettaglio)
441
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 466 cd/m² Media: 450 cd/m² Minimum: 8.54 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 90 %
Al centro con la batteria: 459 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1177:1 (Nero: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Wiko View 3 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Wiko View 2 Pro
IPS, 1528x720, 6
BQ Aquaris X2
IPS LCD, 2160x1080, 5.65
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Screen
-30%
1%
10%
2%
35%
30%
Brightness middle
459
562
22%
631
37%
547
19%
567
24%
427
-7%
644
40%
Brightness
450
541
20%
622
38%
525
17%
547
22%
415
-8%
628
40%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
96
7%
93
3%
92
2%
84
-7%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.56
-44%
0.61
-56%
0.36
8%
0.61
-56%
0.2
49%
Contrast
1177
1004
-15%
1034
-12%
1519
29%
930
-21%
2135
81%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.8
7.9
-65%
5.5
-15%
4.6
4%
4.39
9%
1.95
59%
2.64
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.2
15.7
-71%
8.5
8%
12.1
-32%
7.28
21%
4.47
51%
9.23
-0%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.5
10.4
-89%
5.6
-2%
3.9
29%
4.9
11%
2.3
58%
2.5
55%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.02 109%
2.38 92%
2.17 101%
2.248 98%
2.07 106%
2.024 109%
CCT
7494 87%
8834 74%
7531 86%
7158 91%
7642 85%
6414 101%
6649 98%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9367 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
30.8 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 14.4 ms Incremento
↘ 16.4 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 78 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
50.8 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 24.4 ms Incremento
↘ 26.4 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 85 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (39.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5309 Points ∼78%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4309 Points ∼63% -19%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼55% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼100% +28%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3133 Points ∼46% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼72% -7%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
3362 Points ∼49% -37%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (5172 - 5309, n=3)
3494 Points ∼51% -34%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=322)
4603 Points ∼68% -13%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5743 Points ∼98%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4974 Points ∼85% -13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼68% -31%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼100% +2%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5426 Points ∼93% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼96% -2%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
4022 Points ∼69% -30%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (0 - 5743, n=5)
2259 Points ∼39% -61%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3240 - 11598, n=381)
4621 Points ∼79% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1487 Points ∼83%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1323 Points ∼74% -11%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼47% -44%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1539 Points ∼86% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼96% +16%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
778 Points ∼43% -48%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (0 - 1487, n=5)
592 Points ∼33% -60%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (903 - 4824, n=383)
1387 Points ∼77% -7%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7486 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5706 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼80% -20%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5855 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼78% -22%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
4637 Points ∼62% -38%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (6950 - 7486, n=5)
7255 Points ∼97% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=378)
5073 Points ∼68% -32%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10757 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6437 Points ∼60% -40%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼46% -54%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7004 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼65% -35%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
5395 Points ∼50% -50%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (9065 - 10757, n=5)
9884 Points ∼92% -8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=546)
5569 Points ∼52% -48%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2518 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2272 Points ∼90% -10%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
 
2518 Points ∼100% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=61)
2372 Points ∼94% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
997 Points ∼42%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼29% -30%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1121 Points ∼47% +12%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
 
997 Points ∼42% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=61)
2389 Points ∼100% +140%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1152 Points ∼55%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼41% -25%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1263 Points ∼61% +10%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
 
1152 Points ∼55% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=64)
2076 Points ∼100% +80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2918 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2396 Points ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼57% -43%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2006 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼78% -22%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
1808 Points ∼62% -38%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (2013 - 2918, n=5)
2520 Points ∼86% -14%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=392)
1844 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
993 Points ∼54%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
872 Points ∼47% -12%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼43% -20%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼100% +86%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
770 Points ∼42% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼64% +20%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
415 Points ∼22% -58%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (721 - 993, n=5)
875 Points ∼47% -12%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=392)
1619 Points ∼88% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1164 Points ∼59%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1016 Points ∼52% -13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼46% -23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼100% +69%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
892 Points ∼45% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼68% +14%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
501 Points ∼26% -57%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (853 - 1164, n=5)
1023 Points ∼52% -12%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=395)
1504 Points ∼77% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2924 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2359 Points ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼59% -41%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1887 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼77% -23%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
1810 Points ∼62% -38%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (2388 - 2924, n=4)
2711 Points ∼93% -7%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=407)
1821 Points ∼62% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1605 Points ∼56%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1402 Points ∼49% -13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼45% -19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼100% +78%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1065 Points ∼37% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼54% -3%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
716 Points ∼25% -55%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (1159 - 1605, n=4)
1407 Points ∼49% -12%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=407)
2194 Points ∼77% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1784 Points ∼64%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1540 Points ∼56% -14%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼50% -23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼100% +55%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1179 Points ∼43% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼60% -7%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
827 Points ∼30% -54%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (1309 - 1784, n=4)
1567 Points ∼57% -12%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=408)
1872 Points ∼68% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2528 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2353 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼65% -35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2246 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼93% -7%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
1855 Points ∼73% -27%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (2149 - 2528, n=5)
2434 Points ∼96% -4%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=468)
1781 Points ∼70% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
986 Points ∼58%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
816 Points ∼48% -17%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼41% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼100% +73%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
692 Points ∼41% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼68% +17%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
369 Points ∼22% -63%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (628 - 986, n=5)
790 Points ∼46% -20%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=470)
1350 Points ∼79% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1141 Points ∼62%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
955 Points ∼52% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼44% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼100% +61%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
818 Points ∼45% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼71% +14%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
449 Points ∼24% -61%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (733 - 1141, n=5)
924 Points ∼50% -19%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=478)
1286 Points ∼70% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2720 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2338 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼62% -38%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2307 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼89% -11%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
1833 Points ∼67% -33%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (2159 - 2720, n=4)
2494 Points ∼92% -8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=501)
1691 Points ∼62% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1593 Points ∼58%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼48% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼45% -22%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼100% +73%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
744 Points ∼27% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼46% -20%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
706 Points ∼26% -56%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (861 - 1593, n=4)
1137 Points ∼41% -29%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=501)
1815 Points ∼66% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1755 Points ∼65%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1478 Points ∼55% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼49% -25%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼100% +53%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
876 Points ∼33% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼53% -19%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
818 Points ∼30% -53%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (1008 - 1755, n=4)
1289 Points ∼48% -27%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=509)
1562 Points ∼58% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
24165 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16747 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼51% -49%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼59% -41%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
15177 Points ∼63% -37%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (18065 - 24828, n=5)
22578 Points ∼93% -7%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=659)
13790 Points ∼57% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
21847 Points ∼55%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20806 Points ∼52% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼45% -18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼100% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼42% -24%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
12550 Points ∼32% -43%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (16820 - 21847, n=5)
19897 Points ∼50% -9%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (7567 - 162695, n=659)
20320 Points ∼51% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
22323 Points ∼77%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19743 Points ∼68% -12%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼56% -27%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼56% -28%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
12878 Points ∼45% -42%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (17082 - 22323, n=5)
20432 Points ∼71% -8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (8316 - 83518, n=660)
16844 Points ∼58% -25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
38 fps ∼58%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼55% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼45% -24%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼100% +71%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
34 fps ∼52% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼60% +3%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
22 fps ∼34% -42%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (30 - 38, n=5)
35.4 fps ∼54% -7%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=689)
35.3 fps ∼54% -7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
34 fps ∼60%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
34 fps ∼60% 0%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼44% -26%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼100% +68%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
32 fps ∼56% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼63% +6%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
33 fps ∼58% -3%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (31 - 40, n=5)
34.4 fps ∼60% +1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=692)
27.3 fps ∼48% -20%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼63%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼50% -20%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼41% -35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼100% +60%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼59% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼72% +15%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
9.4 fps ∼29% -53%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (16 - 20, n=5)
18.8 fps ∼59% -6%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=608)
19.6 fps ∼61% -2%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19 fps ∼61%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼48% -21%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼35% -42%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼100% +63%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
17 fps ∼55% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼68% +11%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
17 fps ∼55% -11%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (17 - 29, n=5)
20.4 fps ∼66% +7%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=613)
18.1 fps ∼58% -5%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼52%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼43% -17%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼41% -21%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼100% +92%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
13 fps ∼57% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼61% +17%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
6.1 fps ∼27% -49%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (9.6 - 12, n=5)
11.5 fps ∼50% -4%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=469)
16.1 fps ∼70% +34%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11 fps ∼50%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼45% -11%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼35% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼100% +100%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
12 fps ∼55% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼59% +18%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
12 fps ∼55% +9%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (11 - 20, n=5)
12.8 fps ∼58% +16%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=472)
15.4 fps ∼70% +40%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.3 fps ∼48%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼30% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼91% +91%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4.1 fps ∼46% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼55% +14%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (2.6 - 6.4, n=4)
4.35 fps ∼48% +1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=172)
8.99 fps ∼100% +109%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2.7 fps ∼43%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼27% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼80% +85%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2.6 fps ∼42% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼50% +15%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (2.1 - 4.3, n=4)
2.93 fps ∼47% +9%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=172)
6.24 fps ∼100% +131%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7 fps ∼51%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼32% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼96% +86%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.9 fps ∼51% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼60% +17%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (6.6 - 8.6, n=4)
7.28 fps ∼54% +4%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=173)
13.6 fps ∼100% +94%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.5 fps ∼50%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼33% -35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼94% +87%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.4 fps ∼43% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼60% +20%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (6.2 - 7.6, n=4)
7.13 fps ∼48% -5%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=173)
14.9 fps ∼100% +99%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.4 fps ∼57%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼48% -15%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼41% -28%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +76%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7.7 fps ∼59% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼68% +20%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
3.5 fps ∼27% -53%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (5.8 - 7.4, n=5)
6.92 fps ∼53% -6%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=398)
10.7 fps ∼82% +45%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.8 fps ∼57%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼50% -12%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼36% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼100% +76%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.8 fps ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼68% +19%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
6.6 fps ∼55% -3%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (6.7 - 7.4, n=5)
6.98 fps ∼58% +3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=402)
9.74 fps ∼81% +43%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (ordina per valore)
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7.5 fps ∼48%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14.3 fps ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14.51 fps ∼93%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (7.98 - 11.7, n=2)
9.84 fps ∼63%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=64)
15.6 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (ordina per valore)
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.63 fps ∼52%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12.1 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
11.59 fps ∼91%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
 
7.78 fps ∼61%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.91 - 37.3, n=59)
12.7 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13.03 fps ∼86%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
 
8.99 fps ∼60%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3.2 - 39.7, n=58)
15.1 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
138589 Points ∼82%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
116748 Points ∼69% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼52% -36%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼100% +22%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
124870 Points ∼74% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼85% +4%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
69661 Points ∼41% -50%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (119367 - 138589, n=5)
131946 Points ∼78% -5%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=291)
133058 Points ∼79% -4%
VRMark - Amber Room (ordina per valore)
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
681 Score ∼34%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1681 Score ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1656 Score ∼83%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (1029 - 1119, n=2)
1074 Score ∼54%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=61)
1999 Score ∼100%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1146 Points ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1059 Points ∼92% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼71% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼94% -6%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1051 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼81% -19%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
743 Points ∼65% -35%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (1083 - 1161, n=4)
1130 Points ∼99% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼66% -34%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1590 Points ∼52%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1597 Points ∼52% 0%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼46% -11%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼100% +94%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1465 Points ∼47% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼63% +23%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
975 Points ∼32% -39%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (1262 - 1590, n=4)
1468 Points ∼48% -8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼64% +25%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1958 Points ∼66%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2016 Points ∼68% +3%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼33% -50%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼100% +51%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2823 Points ∼96% +44%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼85% +27%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
861 Points ∼29% -56%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (1958 - 2721, n=4)
2276 Points ∼77% +16%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼50% -24%
System (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3915 Points ∼69%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4434 Points ∼78% +13%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼56% -19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼100% +45%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4826 Points ∼85% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼90% +31%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
2894 Points ∼51% -26%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (3817 - 4736, n=4)
4114 Points ∼72% +5%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼51% -26%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1933 Points ∼71%
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1972 Points ∼72% +2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼50% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼100% +41%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2140 Points ∼78% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼80% +13%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 4096
1159 Points ∼42% -40%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (1830 - 2096, n=4)
1980 Points ∼73% +2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=625)
1450 Points ∼53% -25%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordina per valore)
BQ Aquaris X2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
260 Points ∼36%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
482 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
504 Points ∼70%
Media Mediatek Helio P60
  (322 - 413, n=2)
368 Points ∼51%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=104)
716 Points ∼100%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼100% +36%
Media della classe Smartphone (19 - 161, n=152)
63.4 Points ∼88% +20%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
63 Points ∼88% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼86% +17%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
54 Points ∼75% +2%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
53 Points ∼74%
Media Mediatek Helio P60 (49 - 54, n=3)
52 Points ∼72% -2%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
39 Points ∼54% -26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼81% +18%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
9695 Points ∼76% +10%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
9004 Points ∼71% +3%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
8778 Points ∼69%
Media Mediatek Helio P60 (8287 - 9059, n=5)
8699 Points ∼68% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=682)
6403 Points ∼50% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼38% -45%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4001 Points ∼31% -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
11455.8 ms * ∼100% -158%
Media della classe Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼93% -140%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼90% -131%
BQ Aquaris X2
4733 ms * ∼41% -6%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
4447.6 ms * ∼39%
Media Mediatek Helio P60 (4309 - 4611, n=5)
4428 ms * ∼39% -0%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
4250.7 ms * ∼37% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼34% +12%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼26% +32%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
66.048 Points ∼100% +37%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
51.398 Points ∼78% +7%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
48.107 Points ∼73%
Media Mediatek Helio P60 (41.7 - 48.9, n=5)
45.9 Points ∼69% -5%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
44.245 Points ∼67% -8%
Media della classe Smartphone (12 - 273, n=521)
39.3 Points ∼60% -18%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
22.257 Points ∼34% -54%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Wiko View 3 ProBQ Aquaris X2Sony Xperia 10Nokia 8.1Huawei P Smart Plus 2019Samsung Galaxy A50Wiko View 2 ProMedia 128 GB eMMC FlashMedia della classe Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-9%
-14%
15%
7%
-17%
-1%
-29%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
62.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
58.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
66.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
57.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
65.9 (58.8 - 73.5, n=13)
9%
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=413)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
82.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
84.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
76.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
82.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
77.6 (72.3 - 85.9, n=13)
0%
66.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=413)
-14%
Random Write 4KB
31.2
14.4
-54%
14.39
-54%
7.3
-77%
77.3
148%
18.2
-42%
6.72
-78%
35.4 (8.48 - 127, n=15)
13%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
-32%
Random Read 4KB
89.67
43.9
-51%
53.12
-41%
69.9
-22%
40.3
-55%
98.9
10%
65.63
-27%
68.5 (20.7 - 108, n=15)
-24%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
-49%
Sequential Write 256KB
171.57
188.7
10%
232.87
36%
203.8
19%
152.8
-11%
192.1
12%
194.28
13%
172 (90 - 201, n=15)
0%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
-45%
Sequential Read 256KB
302.74
270.5
-11%
273.8
-10%
279.3
-8%
295.4
-2%
507.3
68%
265.37
-12%
286 (144 - 499, n=15)
-6%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
-12%
Carico massimo
 35.6 °C35.5 °C35 °C 
 36.2 °C35.1 °C34.5 °C 
 32.1 °C35 °C34.1 °C 
Massima: 36.2 °C
Media: 34.8 °C
31.9 °C32.6 °C35.9 °C
32.2 °C33.2 °C36.4 °C
30.9 °C32.6 °C36 °C
Massima: 36.4 °C
Media: 33.5 °C
Alimentazione (max)  27 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 34.8 °C / 95 F, rispetto alla media di 33.1 °C / 92 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Smartphone.
(+) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 36.2 °C / 97 F, rispetto alla media di 35.5 °C / 96 F, che varia da 22.4 a 51.7 °C per questa classe Smartphone.
(+) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 36.4 °C / 98 F, rispetto alla media di 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 31.1 °C / 88 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.137.92527.427.53125.5224024.5245036.138.86326.125.28024.321.610022.124.412519.12516020.241.520019.445.925016.555.331515.160.440015.363.95001466.563014.567.78001471.8100014.576.4125014.577160014.377.8200014.678.325001479.1315014.779.6400014.379.7500014.875.8630014.675.5800014.474.21000014.671.41250014.763.6160001544.4SPL26.788.9N0.875.4median 14.6median 71.4Delta1.512.442.246.742.143.934.636.737.342.739.84532.736.427.729.327.83125.734.323.340.22344.221.449.221.455.720.161.620.563.421.869.520.472.12074.618.273.918.972.9187419.174.518.276.71871.21968.21872.418.17518.166.418.252.318.148.365.965.66267.731.38518.518.514.623.11.662.7median 19.1median 68.21.811.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseWiko View 3 ProSamsung Galaxy A50
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Wiko View 3 Pro analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A50 analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.77 / 1.79 / 1.86 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 2.74 / 5.53 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Wiko View 3 Pro
4000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Wiko View 2 Pro
3000 mAh
Media Mediatek Helio P60
 
Media della classe Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-19%
-10%
0%
-18%
-29%
1%
-16%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.77
0.65
16%
0.72
6%
0.8
-4%
0.8
-4%
0.8
-4%
0.64
17%
0.804 (0.56 - 1.08, n=5)
-4%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=757)
-14%
Idle Average *
1.79
2.24
-25%
2.16
-21%
1.5
16%
1.2
33%
1.5
16%
2.07
-16%
2.17 (1.72 - 3.3, n=5)
-21%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=756)
3%
Idle Maximum *
1.86
2.26
-22%
2.17
-17%
1.8
3%
2.3
-24%
1.7
9%
2.13
-15%
2.21 (1.76 - 3.3, n=5)
-19%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=757)
-9%
Load Average *
2.74
3.87
-41%
3.32
-21%
3.2
-17%
4.5
-64%
5.9
-115%
2.69
2%
3.45 (2.74 - 4.4, n=5)
-26%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=751)
-49%
Load Maximum *
5.53
6.8
-23%
5.34
3%
5.4
2%
7.3
-32%
8.3
-50%
4.46
19%
6.08 (5 - 7.34, n=5)
-10%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=751)
-7%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14ore 46minuti
Wiko View 3 Pro
4000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Wiko View 2 Pro
3000 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
WiFi v1.3
886
617
-30%
541
-39%
738
-17%
523
-41%
701
-21%
857
-3%

Pro

+ design accattivante
+ grande display
+ lunga durata della batteria
+ buone prestazioni di sistema

Contro

- prestazioni moderate della fotocamera per la configurazione a tre telecamere
- no dual-SIM quando si utilizza una scheda microSD
- Il display è molto riflettente

Giudizio Complessivo - il Wiko View 3 Pro convince con le sue prestazioni, ma le fotocamere mostrano delle debolezze

Recensione dello smartphone Wiko View 3 Pro. Dispositivo fornito da Wiko Germany.
Recensione dello smartphone Wiko View 3 Pro. Dispositivo fornito da Wiko Germany.

Il Wiko View 3 Pro ha guadagnato punti nella nostra recensione con il suo design, che è in rilievo con un'attraente sfumatura di colore. Questo smartphone Android da 6,3 pollici non mostra alcun difetto di qualità costruttiva e continua a mostrare le sue qualità anche per quanto riguarda le prestazioni di sistema. Le prestazioni di fascia media sono rifinite da una configurazione di storage di alto livello, che si traduce in un sistema operativo fluido.

    Il Wiko View 3 Pro non solo brilla per il suo ottimo display, ma anche per la sua grande configurazione di archiviazione. Tuttavia, la fotocamera non è in grado di soddisfare pienamente le nostre aspettative.

La configurazione a tre fotocamere, molto pubblicizzata, non riesce a soddisfare completamente le nostre aspettative. Mentre i primi piani sembrano piacevoli in buone condizioni di illuminazione, i soggetti diventano scuri in condizioni di scarsa illuminazione e le aree più luminose sono sovraesposte. Gli acquirenti che possono ovviare a questa carenza saranno entusiasti della lunga durata della batteria e godranno del design del dispositivo e dell'ampio display.

Wiko View 3 Pro - 06/03/2019 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis
85%
Tastiera
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositivo di puntamento
90%
Connettività
45 / 60 → 75%
Peso
89%
Batteria
98%
Display
81%
Prestazioni di gioco
50 / 63 → 79%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
66 / 70 → 95%
Temperatura
91%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Fotocamera
54%
Media
76%
84%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione dello Smartphone Wiko View 3 Pro
Mike Wobker, 2019-06-16 (Update: 2019-06-16)