Notebookcheck

Recensione del Laptop Schenker XMG Neo 17 (2020, Tongfang GM7MPHS): l'Overboost scatena il processore Core-i7

Avanti a tutta velocità. Il Neo 17 gestisce tutti i giochi per computer attuali senza problemi sullo schermo molto reattivo da 17,3 pollici (FHD, IPS, 240 Hz). Anche il livello di dotazoni è buono: una tastiera meccanica, 32 GB di memoria di lavoro (in modalità dual-channel), un SSD NVMe (1 TB) e una connessione Thunderbolt 3 sono presenti. Tuttavia, la durata della batteria non suscita entusiasmo.
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Processore
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL2 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile - 8192 MB, Core: 1140-1380 MHz, Memoria: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 27.21.14.5638 (Nvidia 456.38), Optimus
Memoria
32768 MB 
, DDR4 3200, modalità dual-channel, due banchi di memoria (usati entrambi)
Schermo
17.30 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE HF NE173FHM-NZ1, IPS, lucido: no, 240 Hz
Scheda madre
Intel HM470
Harddisk
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, 2x M.2-2280 (1x NVMe, 1x NVMe/SATA), RAID 0/1, 875 GB libera
Scheda audio
Realtek ALC274 @ Intel Comet Point-H PCH - cAVS
Porte di connessione
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: porta microfono, porta cuffie combinata, Lettore schede: SD, TPM 2.0
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 27.45 x 395.7 x 260.8
Batteria
62.32 Wh, 4100 mAh polimeri di litio, 15.2 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Fotocamera Principale: 0.9 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: stereo, Tastiera: meccanica, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Chiavetta USB con drivers, adattatore USB-C-to-DisplayPort, 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2.6 kg, Alimentazione: 690 gr
Prezzo
2349 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Punteggio
Data
Modello
Peso
Altezza
Dimensione
Risoluzione
Miglior Prezzo
86 %
11/2020
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.6 kg27.45 mm17.30"1920x1080
84 %
10/2020
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.8 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
84 %
08/2020
MSI GL75 10SFR
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.6 kg28 mm17.30"1920x1080
83 %
10/2020
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.8 kg26.5 mm17.30"1920x1080
87 %
05/2020
Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.7 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080

Dispositivi di confronto

405 mm 276 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg404 mm 280 mm 25 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 272 mm 28 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 293 mm 26.5 mm 2.8 kg395.7 mm 260.8 mm 27.45 mm 2.6 kg396 mm 261 mm 27 mm 2.5 kg

Connessioni

Lato sinistro: slot per cable loc, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (tipo A), porta microfono, porta combinata audio
Lato sinistro: slot per cable loc, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (tipo A), porta microfono, porta combinata audio
Lato destro: lettore di schede di memoria (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Tipo-A)
Lato destro: lettore di schede di memoria (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Tipo-A)
Lato posteriore: Thunderbolt 3, HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, alimentazione
Lato posteriore: Thunderbolt 3, HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, alimentazione
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212 MB/s ∼100% +165%
Media della classe Gaming
  (11.7 - 218, n=305)
94.1 MB/s ∼44% +18%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼38%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼37% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼37% -1%
MSI GL75 10SFR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
18 MB/s ∼8% -77%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 17G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
247 MB/s ∼100% +187%
Media della classe Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=303)
111 MB/s ∼45% +29%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼36% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼35% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼35%
MSI GL75 10SFR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.7 MB/s ∼10% -72%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1420 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1390 MBit/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1370 MBit/s ∼96% -1%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1280 MBit/s ∼90% -8%
Aorus 17G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1260 MBit/s ∼89% -9%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1257 (1082min - 1351max) MBit/s ∼89% -10%
Media Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (289 - 1722, n=120)
1220 MBit/s ∼86% -12%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼47% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1355 (1311min - 1381max) MBit/s ∼100% +24%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1340 MBit/s ∼99% +23%
Aorus 17G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1260 MBit/s ∼93% +16%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1190 MBit/s ∼88% +9%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1160 MBit/s ∼86% +6%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1090 MBit/s ∼80%
Media Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=120)
1083 MBit/s ∼80% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼50% -38%
ColorChecker
19.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
15 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
17 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake: 14.95 ∆E min: 8.47 - max: 20.89 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.3 ∆E
18 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
18 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8: 14.49 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 21.79 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.9 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
13 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
21 ∆E
7 ∆E
18 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
0 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GL75 10SFR: 14.17 ∆E min: 0 - max: 21.03 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Aorus 17G XB: 10.03 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 20.41 ∆E
318
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
BOE HF NE173FHM-NZ1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 327 cd/m² Media: 305.4 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 87 %
Al centro con la batteria: 327 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1022:1 (Nero: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 0.89
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
BOE HF NE173FHM-NZ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Schenker XMG Neo 17
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
LG LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GL75 10SFR
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Aorus 17G XB
AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Response Times
-81%
-63%
-61%
-26%
-48%
-68%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
10.8 (5.6, 5.2)
18.8 (9.6, 9.2)
-74%
15.6 (8, 7.6)
-44%
16.4 (8, 8.4)
-52%
12 (6, 6)
-11%
14.4 (6.8, 7.6)
-33%
16 (7.6, 8.4)
-48%
Response Time Black / White *
6.4 (3, 3.2)
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-88%
11.6 (6, 5.6)
-81%
10.8 (5.6, 5.2)
-69%
9 (5, 4)
-41%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
-63%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-88%
PWM Frequency
971 (99)
24510 (19)
208 (30)
Screen
-5%
-15%
23%
1%
-8%
17%
Brightness middle
327
304
-7%
318
-3%
322
-2%
333
2%
323
-1%
293
-10%
Brightness
305
289
-5%
286
-6%
308
1%
309
1%
300
-2%
285
-7%
Brightness Distribution
87
90
3%
86
-1%
92
6%
86
-1%
89
2%
95
9%
Black Level *
0.32
0.26
19%
0.23
28%
0.18
44%
0.215
33%
0.31
3%
0.24
25%
Contrast
1022
1169
14%
1383
35%
1789
75%
1549
52%
1042
2%
1221
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.16
2.65
-23%
3.89
-80%
1.53
29%
1.98
8%
3.01
-39%
1.27
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.14
6.11
-0%
10.56
-72%
3.14
49%
4.34
29%
7.65
-25%
2.24
64%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.89
1.5
-69%
1.03
-16%
0.74
17%
2.01
-126%
1
-12%
1.06
-19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
2.75
26%
5.3
-43%
1.9
49%
2.97
20%
3.8
-3%
1.34
64%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.46 89%
2.46 89%
2.144 103%
2.41 91%
2.154 102%
2.38 92%
CCT
6799 96%
6763 96%
7462 87%
6809 95%
6750 96%
7507 87%
6542 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
71
60
-15%
60
-15%
65
-8%
61
-14%
66
-7%
73
3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
92
-1%
96
3%
87
-6%
96
3%
90
-3%
94
1%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-43% / -17%
-39% / -23%
-19% / 10%
-13% / -3%
-28% / -14%
-26% / 4%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
6.4 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 3 ms Incremento
↘ 3.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 7 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono migliori rispettto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (24.3 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
10.8 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 5.6 ms Incremento
↘ 5.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 10 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono migliori rispettto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (38.6 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9589 (minimo: 5 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

Neo 17 vs. AdobeRGB
Neo 17 vs. AdobeRGB
Griglia subpixel
Griglia subpixel
Neo 17 vs. sRGB
Neo 17 vs. sRGB
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1380 (1371.22-1443.31)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H; Overboost: Ø1766 (1751.01-1787.71)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H; Balanced: Ø1069 (1056.27-1244.13)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1290 (1277.75-1322.62)
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1084 (1049.24-1191.17)
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1296 (1270.16-1339.9)
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1613 (1597.83-1832.68)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø991 (962.32-1086.1)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (904.79-1042.12)
Velocità di clock della CPU durante l'esecuzione del loop CB15
Velocità di clock della CPU durante l'esecuzione del loop CB15
Velocità di clock della CPU durante l'esecuzione del loop CB15 (Overboost)
Velocità di clock della CPU durante l'esecuzione del loop CB15 (Overboost)
Velocità di clock della CPU durante l'esecuzione del loop CB15 (Balanced)
Velocità di clock della CPU durante l'esecuzione del loop CB15 (Balanced)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
210 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1443 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
142.07 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Aiuto
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
210 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
208 Points ∼99% -1%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 214, n=30)
204 Points ∼97% -3%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
203 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
202 Points ∼96% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
195 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
192 Points ∼91% -9%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
191 Points ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼83% -17%
Media della classe Gaming
  (77 - 219, n=630)
162 Points ∼77% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1833 (1597.83min - 1832.68max) Points ∼100% +27%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
1788 Points ∼98% +24%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1111 - 1833, n=32)
1577 Points ∼86% +9%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
1443 Points ∼79%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1344 Points ∼73% -7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
1323 Points ∼72% -8%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
1191 Points ∼65% -17%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1086 Points ∼59% -25%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1042 Points ∼57% -28%
Media della classe Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=637)
933 Points ∼51% -35%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Media della classe Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=95)
382 Seconds * ∼100% -19%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
365.6 Seconds * ∼96% -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
351 Seconds * ∼92% -9%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
347 Seconds * ∼91% -8%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
321 Seconds * ∼84%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (259 - 386, n=23)
318 Seconds * ∼83% +1%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
290 Seconds * ∼76% +10%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
258.6 Seconds * ∼68% +19%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
49474 MIPS ∼100% +12%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
46702 MIPS ∼94% +6%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
44252 MIPS ∼89%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (33674 - 49474, n=24)
43106 MIPS ∼87% -3%
Media della classe Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=96)
37287 MIPS ∼75% -16%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
36718 MIPS ∼74% -17%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
35667 MIPS ∼72% -19%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
31612 MIPS ∼64% -29%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
5594 MIPS ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
5556 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5071 - 5780, n=24)
5360 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5345 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
5190 MIPS ∼93% -7%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
5169 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
5118 MIPS ∼91% -9%
Media della classe Gaming
  (2480 - 5811, n=96)
4924 MIPS ∼88% -12%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
507 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
501 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
494 Points ∼97% -3%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (456 - 511, n=25)
487 Points ∼96% -4%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
486 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
480 Points ∼95% -5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
463 Points ∼91% -9%
Media della classe Gaming
  (312 - 524, n=139)
451 Points ∼89% -11%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points ∼86% -14%
CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
4059 Points ∼100% +22%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3823 Points ∼94% +15%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (2800 - 4176, n=25)
3507 Points ∼86% +6%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
3323 Points ∼82%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
3247 Points ∼80% -2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
3144 Points ∼77% -5%
Media della classe Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=140)
3017 Points ∼74% -9%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
2961 Points ∼73% -11%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
2280 Points ∼56% -31%
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
8412 Points ∼100% +14%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
8139 Points ∼97% +10%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (6988 - 8620, n=22)
7764 Points ∼92% +5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
7373 Points ∼88%
Media della classe Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=78)
6630 Points ∼79% -10%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
6370 Points ∼76% -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
6349 Points ∼75% -14%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
6317 Points ∼75% -14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
1346 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
1321 Points ∼98% -2%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=22)
1302 Points ∼97% -3%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1293 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
1290 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1290 Points ∼96% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
1262 Points ∼94% -6%
Media della classe Gaming
  (703 - 1428, n=78)
1225 Points ∼91% -9%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
14.1 fps ∼100% +18%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps ∼91% +8%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
11.9 fps ∼84%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (10.1 - 14.1, n=20)
11.8 fps ∼84% -1%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.8 fps ∼77% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.4 fps ∼74% -13%
Media della classe Gaming
  (1.7 - 19.8, n=95)
10.3 fps ∼73% -13%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.99 fps ∼71% -16%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Media della classe Gaming
  (23.9 - 95.8, n=72)
56 s ∼100% +8%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
55.36 s ∼99% +7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
54.3 s ∼97% +5%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
53.1 s ∼95% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
51.86 s ∼93%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (30.2 - 84.3, n=23)
50.4 s ∼90% -3%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
50.27 s ∼90% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
41.93 s ∼75% -19%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Media della classe Gaming
  (0.531 - 1.088, n=76)
0.616 sec * ∼100% -13%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.614 sec * ∼100% -12%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.609 sec * ∼99% -12%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.585 sec * ∼95% -7%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.583 sec * ∼95% -7%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.546 - 0.662, n=22)
0.582 sec * ∼94% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
0.566 sec * ∼92% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.546 sec * ∼89%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4405 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6494 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5803 punti
PCMark 10 Score
5747 punti
Aiuto
PCMark 10 - Score
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6571 Points ∼75% +14%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (5447 - 6364, n=4)
5873 Points ∼67% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5747 Points ∼65%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5454 Points ∼62% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5411 Points ∼62% -6%
Media della classe Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=311)
5339 Points ∼61% -7%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5262 Points ∼60% -8%
MSI GL75 10SFR
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Lite-On CL1-8D512
5179 Points ∼59% -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
5109 Points ∼58% -11%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4412 Points ∼71% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
4405 Points ∼71%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
4291 Points ∼69% -3%
Media della classe Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=480)
4290 Points ∼69% -3%
Media Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (3561 - 4405, n=2)
3983 Points ∼64% -10%
MSI GL75 10SFR
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Lite-On CL1-8D512
3372 Points ∼54% -23%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6057.7 μs * ∼100% -1245%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
3225.5 μs * ∼53% -616%
MSI GL75 10SFR
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Lite-On CL1-8D512
1452.7 μs * ∼24% -223%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
505.9 μs * ∼8% -12%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
450.4 μs * ∼7%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3557 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3308 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 608.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 524.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2130 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2671 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.58 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 158.6 MB/s
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
MSI GL75 10SFR
Lite-On CL1-8D512
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Aorus 17G XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Media Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
 
Media della classe Gaming
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-31%
-10%
-28%
-25%
-9%
-8%
-33%
Write 4K
158.6
92.74
-42%
141.9
-11%
132.2
-17%
141.1
-11%
123.4
-22%
149 (92.5 - 208, n=9)
-6%
117 (67.3 - 246, n=300)
-26%
Read 4K
53.58
41.4
-23%
48.75
-9%
45.62
-15%
60.89
14%
45.02
-16%
48.9 (40.5 - 54.3, n=9)
-9%
43.5 (27.6 - 148, n=300)
-19%
Write Seq
2671
1363
-49%
2734
2%
1511
-43%
1681
-37%
2526
-5%
2372 (1197 - 3241, n=9)
-11%
1397 (486 - 4081, n=296)
-48%
Read Seq
2130
1259
-41%
1921
-10%
1890
-11%
1602
-25%
2062
-3%
2057 (1018 - 3037, n=9)
-3%
1544 (539 - 5378, n=296)
-28%
Write 4K Q32T1
524.7
289.7
-45%
422.6
-19%
375.9
-28%
406.6
-23%
497.9
-5%
423 (289 - 540, n=9)
-19%
365 (278 - 706, n=300)
-30%
Read 4K Q32T1
608.9
337.5
-45%
508.5
-16%
524.5
-14%
470.2
-23%
578.5
-5%
491 (332 - 620, n=9)
-19%
429 (298 - 898, n=300)
-30%
Write Seq Q32T1
3308
3332
1%
3055
-8%
1505
-55%
1759
-47%
2982
-10%
3310 (3284 - 3332, n=9)
0%
1649 (529 - 4413, n=300)
-50%
Read Seq Q32T1
3557
3477
-2%
3257
-8%
2008
-44%
1932
-46%
3440
-3%
3542 (3477 - 3567, n=9)
0%
2506 (561 - 9006, n=300)
-30%
AS SSD
-7%
-12%
-63%
-42%
-16%
8%
-153%
Copy Game MB/s
935.5
1082.61
16%
1041.55
11%
697.29
-25%
1806 (802 - 5984, n=6)
93%
743 (23 - 5984, n=330)
-21%
Copy Program MB/s
625
545
-13%
465.34
-26%
446.02
-29%
868 (390 - 2694, n=6)
39%
375 (8 - 2694, n=330)
-40%
Copy ISO MB/s
2188.84
1870.05
-15%
1710.47
-22%
1494.8
-32%
2102 (1710 - 2383, n=6)
-4%
1137 (12 - 3474, n=330)
-48%
Score Total
5774
5248
-9%
5076
-12%
1785
-69%
2377
-59%
4972
-14%
5615 (4450 - 6152, n=9)
-3%
2253 (30 - 6232, n=578)
-61%
Score Write
2546
2413
-5%
2236
-12%
771
-70%
1140
-55%
2294
-10%
2534 (1560 - 2892, n=9)
0%
883 (11 - 3011, n=579)
-65%
Score Read
2137
1869
-13%
1885
-12%
696
-67%
818
-62%
1755
-18%
2041 (1846 - 2291, n=9)
-4%
914 (10 - 2304, n=579)
-57%
Access Time Write *
0.03
0.03
-0%
0.037
-23%
0.126
-320%
0.041
-37%
0.032
-7%
0.031 (0.02 - 0.054, n=9)
-3%
0.3174 (0.0163 - 26.9, n=610)
-958%
Access Time Read *
0.054
0.048
11%
0.053
2%
0.082
-52%
0.07
-30%
0.0441 (0.031 - 0.062, n=9)
18%
0.3782 (0.03 - 18.6, n=601)
-600%
4K-64 Write
2140.39
2048.1
-4%
1867.16
-13%
562.85
-74%
874.53
-59%
1957.87
-9%
2136 (1189 - 2440, n=9)
0%
649 (0.43 - 2797, n=612)
-70%
4K-64 Read
1793.04
1579.26
-12%
1562.35
-13%
477.89
-73%
590.67
-67%
1525.36
-15%
1718 (1579 - 1938, n=9)
-4%
699 (0.44 - 1954, n=612)
-61%
4K Write
129.44
117.57
-9%
100.95
-22%
101.91
-21%
117.94
-9%
116.76
-10%
134 (100 - 188, n=9)
4%
111 (0.53 - 11894, n=612)
-14%
4K Read
55.93
53.48
-4%
39.94
-29%
25.43
-55%
49.76
-11%
50.72
-9%
48.6 (27.9 - 58.3, n=9)
-13%
35.6 (0.35 - 105, n=612)
-36%
Seq Write
2764.38
2468.54
-11%
2676.93
-3%
1065.42
-61%
1477.88
-47%
2192.74
-21%
2645 (2469 - 2842, n=9)
-4%
1019 (43.6 - 4146, n=612)
-63%
Seq Read
2882.06
2359.28
-18%
2827.8
-2%
1922.88
-33%
1777.82
-38%
1790.65
-38%
2741 (2173 - 3002, n=9)
-5%
1394 (55.7 - 4886, n=612)
-52%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-19% / -17%
-11% / -11%
-46% / -50%
-34% / -35%
-13% / -13%
0% / 2%
-93% / -109%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Velocità di lettura costante: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800185019001950200020502100215022002250230023502400245025002550260026502700275028002850290029503000305031003150320032503300335034003450Tooltip
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø3467 (3246.4-3475.58)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00: Ø2878 (1846.54-3258.35)
MSI GL75 10SFR GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Lite-On CL1-8D512: Ø2107 (1976.6-2113.93)
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8: Ø1851 (1535.61-1872.55)
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Time Spy
Port Royal
Port Royal
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost)
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost)
Time Spy (Overboost)
Time Spy (Overboost)
Port Royal (Overboost)
Port Royal (Overboost)
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
DXVAChecker
DXVAChecker
DXVAChecker
DXVAChecker
3DMark 11 Performance
24031 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
46745 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18229 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score
7943 punti
Aiuto
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (27153 - 31050, n=9)
29164 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
29011 Points ∼99% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
28502 Points ∼98%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
27955 Points ∼96% -2%
MSI GL75 10SFR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
26401 Points ∼91% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
25248 Points ∼87% -11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
20697 Points ∼71% -27%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
19513 Points ∼67% -32%
Media della classe Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=728)
14934 Points ∼51% -48%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
8267 Points ∼100% +5%
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (7837 - 8657, n=12)
8182 Points ∼99% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
7931 Points ∼96% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
7840 Points ∼95%
MSI GL75 10SFR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
7608 Points ∼92% -3%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
7358 Points ∼89% -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
6219 Points ∼75% -21%
Media della classe Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=265)
6079 Points ∼74% -22%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
5660 Points ∼68% -28%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (18662 - 23042, n=12)
21713 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
21532 Points ∼99% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
21327 Points ∼98%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
21004 Points ∼97% -2%
MSI GL75 10SFR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
20444 Points ∼94% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
19800 Points ∼91% -7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
16408 Points ∼76% -23%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
15398 Points ∼71% -28%
Media della classe Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=650)
12383 Points ∼57% -42%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
134954 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
131420 Points ∼97%
MSI GL75 10SFR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
125884 Points ∼93% -4%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
123700 Points ∼92% -6%
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (75986 - 141778, n=8)
122569 Points ∼91% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
111855 Points ∼83% -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
103797 Points ∼77% -21%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
101947 Points ∼76% -22%
Media della classe Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=621)
72315 Points ∼54% -45%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
90.8 fps ∼100%
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (76.3 - 94.6, n=9)
87.9 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
87.8 (68min) fps ∼97% -3%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
79.9 fps ∼88% -12%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
73.6 (62min) fps ∼81% -19%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
73 fps ∼80% -20%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.5 (52min) fps ∼75% -25%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
56.9 (48min) fps ∼63% -37%
Media della classe Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=421)
54.3 fps ∼60% -40%
Serious Sam 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra (DX12) AA:2xMS
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
72.5 (15.8min, 21.9P0.1, 44.1P1 - 135max) fps ∼100%
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (67.7 - 78, n=4)
72.3 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
71.1 (2.42min, 32.4P1 - 130max) fps ∼98% -2%
Media della classe Gaming
  (27.8 - 95, n=14)
62.6 fps ∼86% -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
59.8 (17.7min, 33.1P1 - 118max) fps ∼82% -18%
Mafia Definitive Edition - 1920x1080 High Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
96.6 fps ∼100%
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (92 - 96.6, n=2)
94.3 fps ∼98% -2%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
92 fps ∼95% -5%
Media della classe Gaming
  (43.3 - 122, n=10)
75.6 fps ∼78% -22%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
67.1 fps ∼69% -31%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (146 - 190, n=6)
163 fps ∼100% +8%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
155.4 fps ∼95% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
151 fps ∼93%
MSI GL75 10SFR
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
145.1 fps ∼89% -4%
Media della classe Gaming
  (25.9 - 219, n=40)
138 fps ∼85% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
124.4 fps ∼76% -18%
Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (DX12)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (Overboost)
60 (31min, 42P0.1, 47P1 - 112max) fps ∼100% +1%
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (59 - 61, n=4)
59.8 fps ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
59.31 (35.6min, 39.1P0.1, 47.1P1 - 99.5max) fps ∼99%
Media della classe Gaming
  (47.5 - 61, n=5)
57.4 fps ∼96% -3%
Dirt 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (45.5 - 65.1, n=3)
58.1 fps ∼100% +28%
Media della classe Gaming
  (37 - 65.1, n=4)
52.9 fps ∼91% +16%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
45.5 (35min, 36.3P0.1, 37.6P1 - 59.4max) fps ∼78%
Flight Simulator 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra AA:TAA AF:16x
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
303 fps ∼100% +620%
Media della classe Gaming
  (17.5 - 303, n=12)
56.1 fps ∼19% +33%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (Overboost)
43.8 fps ∼14% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
42.1 fps ∼14%
Media NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (37.8 - 43.8, n=3)
41.2 fps ∼14% -2%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
37.8 fps ∼12% -10%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105