Notebookcheck

Recensione dello smartphone Huawei P Smart Z: smartphone di fascia media con una fotocamera pop-up

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 06/22/2019

Cornici strette e grande display. La fotocamera pop-up e' arrivata nella fascia media. Il P Smart Z di Huawei combina caratteristiche premium come la fotocamera pop-up con un prezzo nel segmento medio. Tuttavia, l'implementazione degli smartphones Huawei non è sempre un successo e lascia ancora spazio a miglioramenti.

Huawei P Smart Z 2019 (P Serie)
Processore
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
6.59 pollici 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 391 PPI, capacitive multi-touchscreen, LCD IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52.2 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: Porta audio da 3.5 mm, Lettore schede: microSD fino a 512 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: bussola digitale, sensore di accelerazione, sensore giroscopio, sensore di prossimità, OTG, Miracast, chiamate WiFi
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900, UMTS: 850, 900, 1900, 2100, LTE: 800, 850, 900, 1800, 2100, 2300, 2500, 2600 (everything in MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.8 x 163.5 x 77.3
Batteria
4000 mAh polimeri di litio, Autonomia della batteria (dichiarata dal produttore): 773 ore, Tempo conversazione 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 28 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 16 MPix dual: 16MP (f/1.8) + 2MP (f/2.4), camera2 API: limited
Fotocamera Secondaria: 16 MPix f/2.0, pop-up
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: mono, Tastiera: onscreen, Cuffie, caricatore, cavo USB, tool SIM, istruzioni rapide, scheda garanzia, EMUI 9.0, 24 Mesi Garanzia, SAR: 0.84 W/kg (head), LTE Cat.12 (600 Mbps/100 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L1, senza ventola
Peso
197 gr, Alimentazione: 53 gr
Prezzo
300 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Test Huawei P Smart Z smartphone

Confronto dimensioni

163.5 mm 77.3 mm 8.8 mm 197 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼100% +75%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (min: 314, max: 341) MBit/s ∼99% +74%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼93% +63%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼88% +54%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=424)
223 MBit/s ∼67% +17%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
191 (min: 143, max: 217) MBit/s ∼57%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 (min: 45, max: 237) MBit/s ∼56% -2%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (min: 138, max: 294) MBit/s ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼97% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼94% +28%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼88% +19%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
218 (min: 95, max: 239) MBit/s ∼76% +3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=424)
213 MBit/s ∼74% 0%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
212 (min: 194, max: 237) MBit/s ∼74%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø190 (143-217)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø212 (194-237)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
GPS Huawei P Smart Z
Huawei P Smart Z | Modalità foto
Huawei P Smart Z | Modalità foto
Huawei P Smart Z | Modalità Apertura
Huawei P Smart Z | Modalità Apertura
Huawei P Smart Z | Modalità foto AI
Huawei P Smart Z | Modalità foto AI

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
Huawei P Smart Z
Huawei P Smart Z
Huawei P Smart Z
Huawei P Smart Z
439
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 449 cd/m² Media: 430.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.07 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 92 %
Al centro con la batteria: 439 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1219:1 (Nero: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.59
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97
Huawei P30 Lite
IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Screen
47%
16%
-2%
20%
41%
Brightness middle
439
583
33%
451
3%
537
22%
547
25%
644
47%
Brightness
431
577
34%
430
0%
525
22%
525
22%
628
46%
Brightness Distribution
92
97
5%
90
-2%
85
-8%
93
1%
91
-1%
Black Level *
0.36
0.55
-53%
0.58
-61%
0.36
-0%
Contrast
1219
820
-33%
926
-24%
1519
25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.4
1.6
75%
1.4
78%
6.41
-0%
4.6
28%
2.64
59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.1
3.9
68%
4.4
64%
10.86
10%
12.1
-0%
9.23
24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.6
2.7
69%
2.5
71%
6.7
22%
3.9
55%
2.5
71%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.27 97%
2.22 99%
2.099 105%
2.17 101%
2.024 109%
CCT
9021 72%
6267 104%
6422 101%
8310 78%
7158 91%
6649 98%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9367 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
21.6 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 9.2 ms Incremento
↘ 12.4 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 26 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono migliori rispettto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
40.4 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 18.4 ms Incremento
↘ 22 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 49 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (39.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3813 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼100% +91%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3551 Points ∼49% -7%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points ∼59% +12%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼52% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼67% +29%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2631 - 4083, n=9)
3500 Points ∼48% -8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=322)
4603 Points ∼63% +21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5497 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼100% +9%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5429 Points ∼91% -1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points ∼84% -9%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼67% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼94% +2%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=9)
5457 Points ∼91% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3240 - 11598, n=381)
4621 Points ∼77% -16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1563 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼100% +20%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1544 Points ∼82% -1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼71% -14%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼45% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼92% +10%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=9)
1561 Points ∼83% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (903 - 4824, n=383)
1387 Points ∼74% -11%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6929 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6483 Points ∼94% -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼84% -16%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5803 - 7141, n=9)
5669 Points ∼82% -18%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=378)
5073 Points ∼73% -27%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
9424 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8125 Points ∼86% -14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼75% -25%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7004 - 9424, n=9)
8073 Points ∼86% -14%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=546)
5569 Points ∼59% -41%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2789 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2550 Points ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼81% -19%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2789, n=10)
2337 Points ∼84% -16%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=392)
1844 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
840 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼100% +155%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
843 Points ∼39% 0%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼37% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼55% +41%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=10)
823 Points ∼38% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=392)
1619 Points ∼75% +93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
993 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼100% +123%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
981 Points ∼44% -1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼40% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼60% +34%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=10)
957 Points ∼43% -4%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=395)
1504 Points ∼68% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2723 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2578 Points ∼95% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼82% -18%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2723, n=10)
2351 Points ∼86% -14%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=407)
1821 Points ∼67% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1378 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼98% +56%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1336 Points ∼61% -3%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼59% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼71% +13%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1378, n=10)
1217 Points ∼55% -12%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=407)
2194 Points ∼100% +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1534 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼100% +45%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1494 Points ∼67% -3%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼62% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼75% +9%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1534, n=10)
1361 Points ∼61% -11%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=408)
1872 Points ∼84% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2668 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2489 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼88% -12%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=10)
2444 Points ∼92% -8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=468)
1781 Points ∼67% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
856 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼100% +131%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
819 Points ∼41% -4%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼36% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼58% +34%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 856, n=10)
732 Points ∼37% -14%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=470)
1350 Points ∼68% +58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
990 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼100% +109%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
963 Points ∼46% -3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼39% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼63% +31%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 990, n=10)
865 Points ∼42% -13%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=478)
1286 Points ∼62% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2654 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2490 Points ∼94% -6%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼92% -8%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2654, n=10)
2437 Points ∼92% -8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=501)
1691 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1327 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼100% +49%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1256 Points ∼63% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼62% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼65% -4%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1327, n=10)
1021 Points ∼52% -23%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=501)
1815 Points ∼92% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1490 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼100% +39%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1414 Points ∼68% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼63% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼69% -4%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1490, n=10)
1167 Points ∼56% -22%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=509)
1562 Points ∼75% +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22668 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼60% -40%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12023 Points ∼53% -47%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points ∼70% -30%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼63% -37%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 22668, n=8)
15042 Points ∼66% -34%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=659)
13790 Points ∼61% -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22605 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼100% +92%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21643 Points ∼50% -4%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points ∼48% -7%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼41% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼38% -27%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12426 - 22605, n=8)
20033 Points ∼46% -11%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (7567 - 162695, n=659)
20320 Points ∼47% -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22168 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
18377 Points ∼63% -17%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points ∼67% -12%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼56% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼55% -28%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 22168, n=8)
18433 Points ∼63% -17%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (8316 - 83518, n=660)
16844 Points ∼57% -24%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼100% +90%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
33 fps ∼45% -15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼49% -8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼39% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼53% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (33 - 39, n=9)
37.8 fps ∼51% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=689)
35.3 fps ∼48% -9%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
35 fps ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +66%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
31 fps ∼53% -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼60% 0%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼43% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼62% +3%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (31 - 36, n=9)
34.9 fps ∼60% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=692)
27.3 fps ∼47% -22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼58%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼100% +71%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17 fps ∼47% -19%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼44% -24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼36% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼64% +10%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (17 - 21, n=9)
20.3 fps ∼56% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=608)
19.6 fps ∼54% -7%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼58%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +74%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼48% -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼45% -21%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼33% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼64% +11%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (16 - 19, n=9)
18.4 fps ∼56% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=613)
18.1 fps ∼55% -5%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼100% +86%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼46% -14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼38% -29%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼37% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼54% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12 - 14, n=9)
13.7 fps ∼53% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=469)
16.1 fps ∼62% +15%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +100%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼46% -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼41% -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼33% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼54% +8%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11 - 13, n=9)
12.6 fps ∼53% +5%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=472)
15.4 fps ∼64% +28%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.2 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼100% +314%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼46% +91%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps ∼22% -9%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼30% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼54% +123%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.2 - 7, n=9)
4.22 fps ∼46% +92%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=172)
8.99 fps ∼99% +309%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3.5 fps ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼93% +66%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼42% -26%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼37% -34%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼27% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼50% -11%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.6 - 3.5, n=9)
2.76 fps ∼44% -21%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=172)
6.24 fps ∼100% +78%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.7 fps ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +198%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼46% +36%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps ∼40% +19%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼31% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼59% +74%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 6.9, n=9)
5.93 fps ∼42% +26%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=173)
13.6 fps ∼97% +189%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5.7 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +181%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼44% +23%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼34% -5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼31% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼56% +58%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 7, n=9)
6.31 fps ∼39% +11%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=173)
14.9 fps ∼93% +161%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼100% +95%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.9 fps ∼46% -10%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼42% -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼35% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼59% +16%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.9 - 7.7, n=9)
7.57 fps ∼50% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=398)
10.7 fps ∼71% +39%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.1 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +83%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼50% -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼46% -15%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼33% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼62% +14%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 7.1, n=9)
6.74 fps ∼52% -5%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=402)
9.74 fps ∼75% +37%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
140131 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼100% +28%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
132834 Points ∼74% -5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points ∼66% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼49% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼80% +3%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (124870 - 140188, n=9)
134298 Points ∼75% -4%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=291)
133058 Points ∼74% -5%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1194 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼78% -22%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=9)
1101 Points ∼92% -8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼63% -37%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1489 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼100% +132%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼43% -1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼41% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼57% +31%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1489, n=9)
1466 Points ∼42% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼58% +33%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3013 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼91% -1%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3036 Points ∼93% +1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼30% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼76% -17%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2823 - 4360, n=9)
3267 Points ∼100% +8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼46% -51%
System (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5267 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5146 Points ∼87% -2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼53% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼86% -3%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4826 - 5568, n=9)
5248 Points ∼88% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼49% -45%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2301 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2201 Points ∼76% -4%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼47% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼75% -5%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2140 - 2445, n=9)
2273 Points ∼78% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=625)
1450 Points ∼50% -37%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼100% +16%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019 (Chrome 74)
32.095 Points ∼86%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼85% -1%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 32.1, n=4)
31 Points ∼83% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=97)
30.9 Points ∼83% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼44% -49%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼76% 0%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019 (Chrome 74)
10288 Points ∼76%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼72% -5%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10288, n=9)
9547 Points ∼70% -7%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points ∼62% -19%
Media della classe Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=682)
6403 Points ∼47% -38%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼36% -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Media della classe Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼100% -160%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼96% -150%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * ∼45% -16%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=9)
4247 ms * ∼40% -4%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼39% -1%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019 (Chrome 74)
4103 ms * ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼36% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼27% +29%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Huawei P Smart Z 2019Xiaomi Mi 9 SEHuawei P30 LiteMotorola Moto G7 PlusSony Xperia 10Samsung Galaxy A50Media 64 GB eMMC FlashMedia della classe Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
3%
-5%
-4%
-19%
-3%
-25%
-38%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
55.9 (11.2 - 74.7, n=101)
-17%
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=413)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
74 (41.7 - 87.2, n=101)
-3%
66.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=413)
-13%
Random Write 4KB
77.98
21.86
-72%
87.29
12%
73.1
-6%
14.39
-82%
18.2
-77%
24 (3.4 - 88.2, n=112)
-69%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
-73%
Random Read 4KB
94.07
115.83
23%
71.57
-24%
76.6
-19%
53.12
-44%
98.9
5%
54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=112)
-42%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
-51%
Sequential Write 256KB
191.75
190.1
-1%
158.63
-17%
208.7
9%
232.87
21%
192.1
0%
171 (40 - 246, n=112)
-11%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
304.32
492.48
62%
293.23
-4%
283.6
-7%
273.8
-10%
507.3
67%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=112)
-10%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
-13%
Carico massimo
 42.7 °C42.9 °C41.2 °C 
 42.4 °C41.2 °C41.2 °C 
 40.2 °C40.2 °C40.5 °C 
Massima: 42.9 °C
Media: 41.4 °C
36.5 °C38.2 °C41.2 °C
35.5 °C38.5 °C41.3 °C
36 °C38.5 °C41.2 °C
Massima: 41.3 °C
Media: 38.5 °C
Alimentazione (max)  29.2 °C | Temperatura della stanza 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 41.4 °C / 107 F, rispetto alla media di 33.1 °C / 92 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Smartphone.
(±) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 42.9 °C / 109 F, rispetto alla media di 35.5 °C / 96 F, che varia da 22.4 a 51.7 °C per questa classe Smartphone.
(±) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 41.3 °C / 106 F, rispetto alla media di 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 35.2 °C / 95 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.836.42525.5303127.525.24022.333.75028.531.16318.9298020.22510021.621.412518.723.416020.237.920017.144.525014.647.531515.952.940015.456.950016.56263014.265.280014.571.5100013.372.1125013.472.1160013.671.3200014.270250014.672.2315013.676.7400014.479.2500014.571.8630014.268.8800014.670.51000014.868.31250014.9511600015.244.1SPL26.585.1N0.859.3median 14.6median 68.3Delta0.811.832.53931.931.522.324.821.721.929.228.426.724.920.324.420.526.52325.315.64517.849.116.359.115.461.515.963.515.864.213.367.914.165.914.171.41469.713.567.813.46913.972.314.271.713.967.114.672.914.267.714.766.31568.214.955.415.33826.481.50.852.7median 14.7median 66.30.98.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P Smart Z 2019Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P Smart Z 2019 analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE analisi audio

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.08 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.85 / 2.4 / 2.43 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 4.62 / 7.44 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Media della classe Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
42%
-2%
-0%
18%
7%
0%
15%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.53
38%
0.91
-7%
1.1
-29%
0.72
15%
0.8
6%
0.948 (0.8 - 1.3, n=9)
-12%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=757)
-3%
Idle Average *
2.4
1.18
51%
2.41
-0%
1.7
29%
2.16
10%
1.5
37%
2.11 (1.2 - 2.5, n=9)
12%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=756)
28%
Idle Maximum *
2.43
1.2
51%
2.43
-0%
2.1
14%
2.17
11%
1.7
30%
2.44 (2.2 - 3.6, n=9)
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=757)
17%
Load Average *
4.62
3.04
34%
4.57
1%
5.1
-10%
3.32
28%
5.9
-28%
4.66 (4.06 - 6, n=9)
-1%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=751)
12%
Load Maximum *
7.44
4.83
35%
7.57
-2%
7.9
-6%
5.34
28%
8.3
-12%
7.38 (6.13 - 9.1, n=9)
1%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=751)
21%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12ore 26minuti
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
WiFi v1.3
746
510
-32%
515
-31%
715
-4%
541
-27%
701
-6%

Pro

+ cornici sottili
+ design
+ lunga durata della batteria
+ GPS accurato
+ spazio di archiviazione veloce eMMC ....

Contro

- .... ma non del tipo di memorizzazione UFS
- sensazione al tatto del dorso in plastica
- SoC non sempre adatto alle operazioni di tutti i giorni
- WLAN lento
- poche bande LTE supportate
- nessun video di qualità UHD
- immagini scarse in condizioni di scarsa illuminazione

Giudizio Complessivo - Smartphone di fascia media per gli appassionati di design

Recensione dello smartphone dell'Huawei P Smart Z. Dispositivo di test fornito da Huawei Germany.
Recensione dello smartphone dell'Huawei P Smart Z. Dispositivo di test fornito da Huawei Germany.

L'Huawei P Smart Z si distingue dalla folla di fascia media, grazie al suo design senza lunetta che gestisce senza tacche o fori. Questo è possibile grazie al modulo pop-up della fotocamera. Tuttavia, oltre alla fotocamera pop-up, il P Smart Z non offre altri vantaggi degni di nota che aiutano a differenziare questo telefono Huawei dalla gamma media Android. Invece, a causa della sua costruzione, l'acquirente deve accettare notevoli svantaggi ergonomici. Inoltre, la qualità della costruzione del P Smart Z ci piace solo in misura limitata.

    Il modulo fotocamera pop-up rende il P Smart Z Huawei un vero e proprio esteta. Coloro che possono convivere con le debolezze che abbiamo sottolineato, otterranno uno smartphone solido di fascia media con un ottimo impatto visivo.

Anche la qualità del display e i moduli delle fotocamere integrate non ci hanno convinto. Anche se la fotocamera anteriore è stata spostata all'esterno del display e quindi dovrebbe avere più spazio disponibile, l'obiettivo integrato lascia molto spazio per migliorare la qualità.

Huawei P Smart Z 2019 - 06/17/2019 v6(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
82%
Tastiera
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositivo di puntamento
88%
Connettività
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
88%
Batteria
95%
Display
83%
Prestazioni di gioco
50 / 63 → 79%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
69 / 70 → 98%
Temperatura
85%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Fotocamera
63%
Media
75%
84%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione dello smartphone Huawei P Smart Z: smartphone di fascia media con una fotocamera pop-up
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-06-22 (Update: 2019-06-22)