Notebookcheck

Recensione dello Smartphone Huawei P Smart Plus (2018)

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 02/07/2019

Ancora più smart? Anche se il Huawei P Smart (2019) è nei negozi, il produttore cinese ha appena rilasciato la versione Plus del suo predecessore a quello che potrebbe rivelarsi un prezzo d'occasione. Il modello Plus ha interni migliorati e uno schermo più grande, mentre ha una maggiore somiglianza con il suo successore rispetto al suo compagno di scuderia. Continuate a leggere per scoprire come funziona il P Smart Plus nei nostri test e come si rapporta con i suoi fratelli.

Huawei P Smart Plus (P Serie)
Processore
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
6.3 pollici 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, IPS / LTPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 54 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: Jack per cuffie da 3,5 mm, Lettore schede: Schede microSD fino a 64 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Accelerometro, bussola, giroscopio, sensore di prossimità, USB OTG
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G: B1, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.6 x 157.6 x 75.2
Batteria
12.7 Wh, 3340 mAh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 16 MPix f/2.2, Autofocus a rilevamento di fase (PDAF), LED Flash, video fino a 2160p/30 FPS. Sensore secondario: 2,0 MP, profondità di campo
Fotocamera Secondaria: 24 MPix Fotocamera principale f/2.0. Sensore secondario: 2,0 MP, profondità di campo
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Altoparlante mono sul bordo inferiore del dispositivo, Tastiera: Tstiera Virtuale, Caricabatterie, cavo USB, strumento SIM, cuffie, Salute, Modalità Party, Phone manager, Temi, 24 Mesi Garanzia, Valori SAR: Corpo - 1,27 W/kg; testa - 0,79 W/kg. LED di notifica. LTE Cat. 12 - 600 MBit/s download, 150 MBit/s velocità di upload. Radio FM., senza ventola
Peso
169 gr, Alimentazione: 60 gr
Prezzo
299 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Huawei P Smart Plus (2018)
Huawei P Smart Plus (2018)
Huawei P Smart Plus (2018)
Huawei P Smart Plus (2018)
Huawei P Smart Plus (2018)

Confronto Dimensioni

157.9 mm 76.4 mm 8.2 mm 178 g158.3 mm 75.3 mm 7.6 mm 172 g157.6 mm 75.2 mm 7.6 mm 169 g155.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.95 mm 160 g150.1 mm 72.05 mm 7.45 mm 143 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
354 (min: 313, max: 366) MBit/s ∼100% +525%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=367)
219 MBit/s ∼62% +287%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
207 MBit/s ∼58% +266%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (min: 28, max: 206) MBit/s ∼46% +190%
Huawei P Smart Plus
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼16%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼15% -9%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
272 (min: 212, max: 313) MBit/s ∼100% +402%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s ∼86% +330%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 (min: 197, max: 262) MBit/s ∼83% +317%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=367)
210 MBit/s ∼77% +287%
Huawei P Smart Plus
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.2 (min: 50, max: 57) MBit/s ∼20%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 MBit/s ∼18% -7%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø56.6 (52-59)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø54.2 (50-57)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Panoramica
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Panoramica
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Circuito
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Circuito
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Ponte
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Ponte
GPS test: Huawei P Smart Plus (2018) - Panoramica
GPS test: Huawei P Smart Plus (2018) - Panoramica
GPS test: Huawei P Smart Plus (2018) - Circuito
GPS test: Huawei P Smart Plus (2018) - Circuito
GPS test: Huawei P Smart Plus (2018) – Ponte
GPS test: Huawei P Smart Plus (2018) – Ponte

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
472
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 482 cd/m² Media: 471.2 cd/m² Minimum: 0.8 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 94 %
Al centro con la batteria: 479 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1774:1 (Nero: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.24 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.39
Huawei P Smart Plus
IPS/LTPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Huawei P Smart 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2
Huawei P smart
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
LCD IPS, 2280x1080, 6.26
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Screen
16%
-5%
11%
-25%
Brightness middle
479
458
-4%
573
20%
501
5%
453
-5%
Brightness
471
440
-7%
568
21%
486
3%
460
-2%
Brightness Distribution
94
85
-10%
89
-5%
88
-6%
89
-5%
Black Level *
0.27
0.35
-30%
0.63
-133%
0.44
-63%
0.52
-93%
Contrast
1774
1309
-26%
910
-49%
1139
-36%
871
-51%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.24
1.4
78%
4.2
33%
2.3
63%
7.1
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.05
3.8
62%
6.4
36%
6.1
39%
11.6
-15%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.4
2.4
68%
4.6
38%
1.5
80%
8.3
-12%
Gamma
2.39 92%
2.22 99%
2.24 98%
2.29 96%
2.35 94%
CCT
8942 73%
6235 104%
7157 91%
6579 99%
9082 72%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 9259 Hz ≤ 20 % settaggio luminosita'

Il display sfarfalla a 9259 Hz (Probabilmente a causa dell'uso di PWM) Flickering rilevato ad una luminosita' di 20 % o inferiore. Non dovrebbe verificarsi flickering o PWM sopra questo valore di luminosita'.

La frequenza di 9259 Hz è abbastanza alta, quindi la maggioranza degli utenti sensibili al PWM non dovrebbero notare alcun flickering.

In confronto: 52 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9705 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
20 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 7 ms Incremento
↘ 13 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 20 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono migliori rispettto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25.4 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
48 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 21 ms Incremento
↘ 27 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 77 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (40.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4066 Points ∼87%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3157 Points ∼68% -22%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
3117 Points ∼67% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4547 Points ∼98% +12%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3909 Points ∼84% -4%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (3157 - 4083, n=5)
3674 Points ∼79% -10%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (870 - 21070, n=252)
4659 Points ∼100% +15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5585 Points ∼99%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5407 Points ∼96% -3%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
3732 Points ∼66% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4945 Points ∼88% -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5615 Points ∼100% +1%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=5)
5486 Points ∼98% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=305)
4464 Points ∼80% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1593 Points ∼99%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1527 Points ∼95% -4%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
946 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1335 Points ∼83% -16%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1612 Points ∼100% +1%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=5)
1574 Points ∼98% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=306)
1313 Points ∼81% -18%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7027 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5951 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
4874 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5611 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5803 - 7141, n=5)
5184 Points ∼74% -26%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2828 - 9868, n=315)
4816 Points ∼69% -31%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
9017 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7078 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
5817 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6218 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8525 Points ∼95% -5%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7078 - 9017, n=5)
8144 Points ∼90% -10%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2695 - 13531, n=484)
5243 Points ∼58% -42%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2510 Points ∼93%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2085 Points ∼77% -17%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
1688 Points ∼63% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2258 Points ∼84% -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2699 Points ∼100% +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1851 Points ∼69% -26%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2702, n=6)
2320 Points ∼86% -8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (573 - 4439, n=330)
1784 Points ∼66% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1194 Points ∼78%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
838 Points ∼55% -30%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
401 Points ∼26% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
645 Points ∼42% -46%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
803 Points ∼52% -33%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
470 Points ∼31% -61%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=6)
824 Points ∼54% -31%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=330)
1531 Points ∼100% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1351 Points ∼95%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
966 Points ∼68% -28%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
483 Points ∼34% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
765 (min: 643, max: 2256) Points ∼54% -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
952 Points ∼67% -30%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
563 Points ∼39% -58%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=6)
958 Points ∼67% -29%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (94 - 5913, n=333)
1426 Points ∼100% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2685 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2459 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
1741 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2383 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2637 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1656 Points ∼62% -38%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2697, n=6)
2367 Points ∼88% -12%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=345)
1760 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1317 Points ∼62%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1225 Points ∼58% -7%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
618 Points ∼29% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1406 Points ∼67% +7%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1316 Points ∼62% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
740 Points ∼35% -44%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1317, n=6)
1193 Points ∼57% -9%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=345)
2111 Points ∼100% +60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1485 Points ∼83%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1379 Points ∼77% -7%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
721 Points ∼40% -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1554 Points ∼87% +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1481 Points ∼83% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
844 Points ∼47% -43%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1485, n=6)
1340 Points ∼75% -10%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (159 - 7856, n=346)
1791 Points ∼100% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2716 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2392 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
1827 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2354 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2641 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1924 Points ∼71% -29%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=6)
2444 Points ∼90% -10%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (486 - 4216, n=406)
1715 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
793 Points ∼63%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
703 Points ∼56% -11%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
256 Points ∼20% -68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
815 Points ∼65% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
812 Points ∼65% +2%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
457 Points ∼36% -42%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 812, n=6)
708 Points ∼56% -11%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (65 - 6355, n=408)
1257 Points ∼100% +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
941 Points ∼78%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
834 Points ∼69% -11%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
316 Points ∼26% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
953 Points ∼79% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
960 Points ∼80% +2%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
550 Points ∼46% -42%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 960, n=6)
840 Points ∼70% -11%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (80 - 5509, n=416)
1202 Points ∼100% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2637 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2381 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
1787 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2350 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2625 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1907 Points ∼72% -28%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2645, n=6)
2413 Points ∼92% -8%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (512 - 4215, n=439)
1618 Points ∼61% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1275 Points ∼75%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
683 Points ∼40% -46%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
229 Points ∼13% -82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1338 Points ∼78% +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1277 Points ∼75% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
568 Points ∼33% -55%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1280, n=6)
1037 Points ∼61% -19%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (43 - 9963, n=439)
1710 Points ∼100% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1440 Points ∼97%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
812 Points ∼55% -44%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
284 Points ∼19% -80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1480 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1441 Points ∼97% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
673 Points ∼45% -53%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1445, n=6)
1182 Points ∼80% -18%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (55 - 7166, n=447)
1465 Points ∼99% +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17015 Points ∼97%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
11212 Points ∼64% -34%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
14930 Points ∼85% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
17065 Points ∼97% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17598 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11158 Points ∼63% -34%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 17598, n=6)
14274 Points ∼81% -16%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3958 - 37475, n=599)
13353 Points ∼76% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21538 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19510 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
11262 Points ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
20865 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21465 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12426 Points ∼58% -42%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12426 - 21538, n=6)
19336 Points ∼90% -10%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1152 - 162695, n=599)
19158 Points ∼89% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
20337 Points ∼99%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
16754 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
11912 Points ∼58% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
19980 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
20466 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12120 Points ∼59% -40%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 20468, n=6)
17820 Points ∼87% -12%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2915 - 77599, n=600)
16050 Points ∼78% -21%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
39 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
19 fps ∼49% -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
36 fps ∼92% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼100% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (39 - 39, n=5)
39 fps ∼100% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4.4 - 251, n=623)
33.3 fps ∼85% -15%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
36 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
18 fps ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
33 fps ∼92% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼100% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (36 - 36, n=5)
36 fps ∼100% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (11 - 120, n=626)
26.1 fps ∼73% -27%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
21 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
8.7 fps ∼41% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
16 fps ∼76% -24%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼100% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (21 - 21, n=5)
21 fps ∼100% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (7 - 132, n=542)
18.1 fps ∼86% -14%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
8.3 fps ∼44% -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
14 fps ∼74% -26%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼100% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (19 - 19, n=5)
19 fps ∼100% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (6.2 - 115, n=547)
17 fps ∼89% -11%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼92%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
14 fps ∼92% 0%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
5.3 fps ∼35% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
10 fps ∼66% -29%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼92% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (14 - 14, n=5)
14 fps ∼92% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.3 - 88, n=404)
15.2 fps ∼100% +9%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼89%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
13 fps ∼89% 0%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
5.2 fps ∼36% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
9.1 fps ∼62% -30%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼89% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (13 - 13, n=5)
13 fps ∼89% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3.8 - 110, n=407)
14.6 fps ∼100% +12%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.1 fps ∼44%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4.1 fps ∼44% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
3.4 fps ∼36% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼75% +71%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4 - 7, n=5)
4.66 fps ∼50% +14%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.7 - 59, n=108)
9.37 fps ∼100% +129%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼40%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2.6 fps ∼40% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2.2 fps ∼34% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3.1 fps ∼48% +19%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.6 - 3.1, n=5)
2.7 fps ∼41% +4%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.5 - 31, n=108)
6.51 fps ∼100% +150%
Normal Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼46%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.4 fps ∼46% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5.4 fps ∼39% -16%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.6 fps ∼33% -28%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 6.4, n=5)
5.8 fps ∼42% -9%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.5 - 59, n=109)
13.8 fps ∼100% +116%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼45%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7 fps ∼45% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6 fps ∼39% -14%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5.1 fps ∼33% -27%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 7, n=5)
6.14 fps ∼40% -12%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.75 - 63, n=108)
15.4 fps ∼100% +120%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.6 fps ∼73%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7.7 fps ∼74% +1%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
3.2 fps ∼31% -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6.3 fps ∼61% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.6 fps ∼73% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7.6 - 7.7, n=5)
7.62 fps ∼73% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.6 - 54, n=333)
10.4 fps ∼100% +37%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.7 fps ∼72%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.8 fps ∼73% +1%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
2.9 fps ∼31% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5.7 fps ∼61% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.8 fps ∼73% +1%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 6.8, n=5)
6.7 fps ∼72% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.8 - 58, n=337)
9.33 fps ∼100% +39%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
139998 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
130070 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
87688 Points ∼63% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
115565 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
139050 Points ∼99% -1%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (129928 - 140188, n=5)
135847 Points ∼97% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (41483 - 374820, n=227)
125682 Points ∼90% -10%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
112639 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
104012 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
66353 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
95603 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
111303 Points ∼99% -1%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (104012 - 112870, n=4)
110206 Points ∼98% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=437)
81300 Points ∼72% -28%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1212 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
982 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
919 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1018 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1208 Points ∼100% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=5)
1123 Points ∼93% -7%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=556)
722 Points ∼60% -40%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1459 Points ∼79%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1469 Points ∼79% +1%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
857 Points ∼46% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1598 Points ∼86% +10%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1450 Points ∼78% -1%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1470, n=5)
1461 Points ∼79% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=556)
1851 Points ∼100% +27%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3630 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2972 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
1889 Points ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1935 Points ∼53% -47%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3507 Points ∼97% -3%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2969 - 4360, n=5)
3488 Points ∼96% -4%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=556)
1355 Points ∼37% -63%
System (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5568 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5074 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
3223 Points ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4432 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5556 Points ∼100% 0%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5026 - 5568, n=5)
5351 Points ∼96% -4%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=556)
2714 Points ∼49% -51%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2445 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2159 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P smart
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
1480 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1933 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2417 (min: 5556) Points ∼99% -1%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2159 - 2445, n=5)
2320 Points ∼95% -5%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=560)
1347 Points ∼55% -45%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P Smart Plus (Chrome 71)
50.246 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
49.673 Points ∼99% -1%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 50.2, n=5)
48.7 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite (Chrome 69)
47.321 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro (Chrome 70)
44.786 Points ∼89% -11%
Media della classe Smartphone (0 - 273, n=470)
37.8 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
26.63 Points ∼53% -47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
9708 Points ∼100% +4%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 9708, n=5)
9314 Points ∼96% 0%
Huawei P Smart Plus (Chrome 71)
9303 Points ∼96%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite (Chrome 69)
9041 Points ∼93% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro (Chrome 70)
8386 Points ∼86% -10%
Media della classe Smartphone (4865 - 43280, n=616)
5927 Points ∼61% -36%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
4497 Points ∼46% -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Media della classe Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=635)
11091 ms * ∼100% -157%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
9698.2 ms * ∼87% -125%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro (Chrome 70)
4766.9 ms * ∼43% -11%
Huawei P Smart Plus (Chrome 71)
4310 ms * ∼39%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite (Chrome 69)
4204.5 ms * ∼38% +2%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4310, n=5)
4176 ms * ∼38% +3%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
3998.8 ms * ∼36% +7%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
69 Points ∼100% +17%
Media della classe Smartphone (24 - 161, n=92)
64.4 Points ∼93% +9%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (58 - 69, n=5)
61.4 Points ∼89% +4%
Huawei P Smart Plus (Chrome 71)
59 Points ∼86%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite (Chrome 69)
59 Points ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro (Chrome 70)
56 Points ∼81% -5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei P Smart Plus (Chrome 71)
174 Points ∼100%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
169 Points ∼97% -3%
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710 (147 - 178, n=5)
163 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro (Chrome 70)
153 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite (Chrome 69)
148 Points ∼85% -15%
Media della classe Smartphone (251 - 362, n=313)
118 Points ∼68% -32%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
92 Points ∼53% -47%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Huawei P Smart PlusHuawei P Smart 2019Huawei P smartXiaomi Redmi Note 6 ProHuawei Mate 20 LiteMedia 64 GB eMMC FlashMedia della classe Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
-19%
-12%
-3%
-23%
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
29%
72.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
39%
63.68 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
23%
67.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30%
55.7 (58.4 - 74.7, n=92)
7%
47.4 (9.5 - 87.1, n=369)
-9%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
82.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
83.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
76.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
73.9 (81.2 - 87.2, n=92)
-4%
65.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=369)
-15%
Random Write 4KB
74
70.7
-4%
21.3
-71%
67.27
-9%
48.78
-34%
23.1 (3.4 - 88.2, n=101)
-69%
18.5 (0.14 - 250, n=667)
-75%
Random Read 4KB
102.5
45.66
-55%
66.11
-36%
55.55
-46%
78.54
-23%
53 (11.4 - 149, n=101)
-48%
42.1 (1.59 - 174, n=667)
-59%
Sequential Write 256KB
200.5
191.4
-5%
121.07
-40%
119.9
-40%
217.34
8%
172 (40 - 246, n=101)
-14%
87.6 (2.99 - 388, n=667)
-56%
Sequential Read 256KB
303.2
288.27
-5%
269.36
-11%
278.9
-8%
304.33
0%
272 (115 - 704, n=101)
-10%
246 (12.1 - 912, n=667)
-19%
Carico massimo
 36.8 °C32.2 °C30.8 °C 
 36.8 °C32.2 °C31.1 °C 
 35.2 °C32.2 °C30.5 °C 
Massima: 36.8 °C
Media: 33.1 °C
29.8 °C31.6 °C38.7 °C
29.8 °C32.1 °C38.8 °C
30.8 °C32.2 °C37.2 °C
Massima: 38.8 °C
Media: 33.4 °C
Alimentazione (max)  45.3 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 33.1 °C / 92 F, rispetto alla media di 33.1 °C / 92 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Smartphone.
(+) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 36.8 °C / 98 F, rispetto alla media di 35.6 °C / 96 F, che varia da 22.4 a 51.7 °C per questa classe Smartphone.
(+) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 38.8 °C / 102 F, rispetto alla media di 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 30.4 °C / 87 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.139.62539.141.23130.334.64034.232.65031.436.46327.536.88021.826.810022.825.912524.325.716020.532.120019.342.225018.750.331517.352.740016.755.450016.554.963016.658.180015.658.6100015.161.6125014.161.6160014.160.9200014.466.5250013.968.6315013.868.3400013.664500014.669.963001470.5800014.272.61000013.769.41250013.763.91600013.955.6SPL63.869.763.426.979.2N16.622.916.80.941.9median 14.6median 60.9Delta2732.830.524.328.818.625.824.325.833.830.221.231.624.829.318.523.916.423.617.138.117.940.716.845.814.947.915.155.714.257.913.963.514.867.514.27014.770.114.468.814.3701473.313.876.914.882.714.478.81571.214.766.114.860.914.853.914.746.526.7870.859.4median 14.8median 63.50.611.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P Smart PlusHuawei P Smart 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P Smart Plus analisi audio

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P Smart 2019 analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 2.5 / 3.6 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 5 / 7 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P Smart Plus
3340 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
3750 mAh
Media HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Media della classe Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
18%
30%
16%
20%
14%
29%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
0.84
35%
0.62
52%
1.12
14%
1.01
22%
1.014 (0.84 - 1.3, n=5)
22%
0.884 (0.2 - 3.4, n=700)
32%
Idle Average *
2.5
2.21
12%
1.76
30%
2.62
-5%
2.21
12%
2.28 (2.19 - 2.5, n=5)
9%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=699)
31%
Idle Maximum *
3.6
2.23
38%
1.87
48%
2.65
26%
2.23
38%
2.52 (2.2 - 3.6, n=5)
30%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=700)
44%
Load Average *
5
4.2
16%
4.47
11%
3.65
27%
4.06
19%
4.45 (4.06 - 5, n=5)
11%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=694)
19%
Load Maximum *
7
7.86
-12%
6.39
9%
5.73
18%
6.32
10%
7 (6.13 - 7.86, n=5)
-0%
5.84 (1.2 - 14.2, n=694)
17%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8ore 32minuti
Huawei P Smart Plus
3340 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Lite
3750 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
-1%
10%
88%
64%
Reader / Idle
1293
985
1151
WiFi v1.3
512
506
-1%
565
10%
961
88%
842
64%
Load
257
202
295
H.264
464
615
972

Pro

+ prestazioni del sistema solido
+ case premium
+ GPS preciso
+ abbastanza potente per il gaming
+ rimane fresco sotto carico

Contro

- foto di scarsa qualità in condizioni di scarsa illuminazione
- durata della batteria non esaltante
- no 5 GHz Wi-Fi
- tinta blu sul display
Recensione dello smartphone Huawei P Smart Plus (2018).
Recensione dello smartphone Huawei P Smart Plus (2018).

Il Huawei P Smart Plus (2018) è una buona alternativa al P Smart 2019 e al suo predecessore. Il primo ha lo stesso SoC del P Smart 2019 e fotocamere migliori di entrambe le sue controparti P Smart. Il P Smart Plus (2018) ha più spazio di archiviazione rispetto ad entrambi i dispositivi e 1 GB di RAM in più rispetto al P Smart (2018).

Il P Smart Plus (2018) è attualmente leggermente più economico del più recente P Smart 2019, anche se il primo ha una tacca più grande, Wi-Fi più lento ed utilizza ancora Android 8.1 Oreo.

La nostra unità di prova ha anche un modulo GPS preciso, ma la durata della batteria è poco stimolante. Il SoC Kirin 710 ha funzionato bene, e il dispositivo è costruito bene. Nel complesso, il P Smart Plus (2018) è un significativo aggiornamento rispetto al P Smart (2018), ma quest'ultimo può fornire un miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per le persone che operano con budget più ristretti.

    L'Huawei P Smart Plus (2018) ha un buon rapporto qualità-prezzo e ha dato buoni risultati nei nostri test, ma in alcune aree non è all'altezza dei suoi colleghi P Smart.

In breve, il P Smart Plus (2018) è un pacchetto completo migliore rispetto agli altri dispositivi P Smart. Il suo set di caratteristiche e il suo design sono paragonabili al P Smart 2019 ma ad un costo inferiore, mentre è un notevole aggiornamento rispetto al P Smart (2018). Tuttavia, si consiglia di optare per il P Smart 2019 se il prezzo scende, ma il P Smart Plus (2018) è uno smartphone di grandi dimensioni per il resto decente.

Huawei P Smart Plus - 02/01/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Tastiera
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositivo di puntamento
92%
Connettività
37 / 60 → 62%
Peso
91%
Batteria
91%
Display
84%
Prestazioni di gioco
49 / 63 → 78%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
67 / 70 → 96%
Temperatura
91%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
52 / 91 → 57%
Fotocamera
63%
Media
74%
84%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione dello Smartphone Huawei P Smart Plus (2018)
Florian Schmitt, 2019-02- 7 (Update: 2019-02- 7)