Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei P Smart

Inge Schwabe (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 03/10/2018

Quanto smart è lo Huawei P Smart? Non ci avevamo mai pensato. Scegliere il nome "smart" per uno smartphone è quasi come chiamare una squadra di calcio "squadra". E allora nasce la domanda: ma cosa avrà di "smart" questo dispositivo? Vediamolo insieme.

Huawei P smart (P Serie)
Processore
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Kirin 659
Scheda grafica
Memoria
3072 MB 
, 16nm Octacore, 2.36GHz*4, 1.7GHz*4
Schermo
5.65 pollici 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 428 PPI, kapazitiver 10-Punkt-Multitouchscreen, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.89 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3,5 mm Headset-Klinkenanschluss, Lettore schede: Micro-SD bis 256 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Fingerabdruck, Näherung, Kompass, Schwerkraft, USB: OTG, DisplayPort
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, B900, B1800, B1900; UMTS/HSPA+: 850, B900, B2100, B1900; LTE Band 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.45 x 150.1 x 72.05
Batteria
0 Wh, 3000 mAh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 13 MPix Duale Kamera, Autofokus, LED
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Monolautsprecher, Tastiera: virtuell, 5V/2A-Ladegerät, Micro-USB-Kabel, Schnellstartanleitung, Garantiekarte, Kopfhörer, Displayschutzfolie, EMUI 8.0, 24 Mesi Garanzia, Miracast, USB-OTG, Micro-USB 2.0, UKW-Radio, Kopf-SAR: Körper-SAR: 1.24 W/kg, senza ventola
Peso
143 gr, Alimentazione: 61 gr
Prezzo
259 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Android navigation options
Android navigation options
quick start menu in lockscreen
quick start menu in lockscreen
quick start of apps via shortcut
quick start of apps via shortcut
for your convenience: a trash for deleted photos
for your convenience: a trash for deleted photos
split screen view for running two apps side-by-side
split screen view for running two apps side-by-side
 
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
333 MBit/s ∼100% +544%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼92% +490%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼75% +385%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼36% +134%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼16% +5%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 MBit/s ∼16% +2%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼16%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41.9 MBit/s ∼13% -19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼100% +457%
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
270 MBit/s ∼96% +437%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
225 MBit/s ∼80% +347%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼40% +121%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼19% +7%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 MBit/s ∼19% +6%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 MBit/s ∼18%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼18% -1%
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - S-turn
Garmin Edge 500 - S-turn
Garmin Edge 500 - switchback
Garmin Edge 500 - switchback
Huawei P Smart - overview
Huawei P Smart - overview
Huawei P Smart - S-turn
Huawei P Smart - S-turn
Huawei P Smart - switchback
Huawei P Smart - switchback
dual-camera bokeh effect
dual-camera bokeh effect
dual-camera bokeh effect
dual-camera bokeh effect
front-facing camera bokeh effect
front-facing camera bokeh effect

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
reference card
reference card
reference card (magnified)
shifted to the right
shifted to the right
floating keyboard
floating keyboard
landscape mode, split
landscape mode, split
size adjustment
size adjustment
keyboard menu
keyboard menu
individual keyboard design
individual keyboard design
594
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 594 cd/m² Media: 567.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.34 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 89 %
Al centro con la batteria: 573 cd/m²
Contrasto: 910:1 (Nero: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.24
Huawei P smart
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Honor 9 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Huawei P8 lite 2017
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7
Motorola Moto G5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
BQ Aquaris X
LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
11%
-5%
1%
15%
25%
-3%
-2%
Brightness middle
573
627
9%
575
0%
467
-18%
454
-21%
574
0%
490
-14%
675
18%
Brightness
568
622
10%
559
-2%
457
-20%
463
-18%
576
1%
502
-12%
702
24%
Brightness Distribution
89
82
-8%
91
2%
89
0%
86
-3%
94
6%
92
3%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.63
0.41
35%
0.39
38%
0.3
52%
0.43
32%
0.59
6%
Contrast
910
1529
68%
1474
62%
1557
71%
1140
25%
1144
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.2
4.5
-7%
5.2
-24%
5
-19%
2
52%
2.4
43%
5.7
-36%
4.5
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.4
7
-9%
10.3
-61%
8.2
-28%
5.3
17%
3.8
41%
7.8
-22%
9.1
-42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.6
5.1
-11%
7.2
-57%
6.1
-33%
1.7
63%
1.9
59%
4.7
-2%
6.4
-39%
Gamma
2.24 107%
2.26 106%
2.4 100%
2.15 112%
2.1 114%
2.09 115%
2.4 100%
2.24 107%
CCT
7157 91%
7201 90%
7224 90%
7961 82%
6394 102%
6502 100%
7526 86%
7478 87%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10570 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms Incremento
↘ 13 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms Incremento
↘ 23 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
66353 Points ∼29%
Honor 9 Lite
67727 Points ∼29% +2%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
56798 Points ∼25% -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
63195 Points ∼27% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points ∼21% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
45549 Points ∼20% -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
46370 Points ∼20% -30%
BQ Aquaris X
63428 Points ∼28% -4%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
4874 Points ∼47%
Honor 9 Lite
4911 Points ∼48% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4847 Points ∼47% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points ∼36% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3756 Points ∼36% -23%
Motorola Moto G5s
3604 Points ∼35% -26%
BQ Aquaris X
4891 Points ∼47% 0%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
5817 Points ∼57%
Honor 9 Lite
5887 Points ∼57% +1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4419 Points ∼43% -24%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
6024 Points ∼59% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points ∼48% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5000 Points ∼49% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s
4669 Points ∼45% -20%
BQ Aquaris X
5792 Points ∼56% 0%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
919 Points ∼54%
Honor 9 Lite
888 Points ∼52% -3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
753 Points ∼44% -18%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
666 Points ∼39% -28%
Motorola Moto G5s
703 Points ∼41% -24%
BQ Aquaris X
843 Points ∼50% -8%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
857 Points ∼9%
Honor 9 Lite
859 Points ∼9% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
826 Points ∼9% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
849 Points ∼9% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points ∼6% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
529 Points ∼6% -38%
Motorola Moto G5s
723 Points ∼8% -16%
BQ Aquaris X
1014 Points ∼11% +18%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
1889 Points ∼43%
Honor 9 Lite
1757 Points ∼40% -7%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1658 Points ∼37% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1998 Points ∼45% +6%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points ∼29% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1296 Points ∼29% -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
656 Points ∼15% -65%
BQ Aquaris X
1039 Points ∼23% -45%
System (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
3223 Points ∼31%
Honor 9 Lite
3058 Points ∼30% -5%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
2694 Points ∼26% -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2983 Points ∼29% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points ∼23% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2185 Points ∼21% -32%
Motorola Moto G5s
1553 Points ∼15% -52%
BQ Aquaris X
3551 Points ∼35% +10%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
1480 Points ∼34%
Honor 9 Lite
1423 Points ∼33% -4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
435 Points ∼10% -71%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1398 Points ∼32% -6%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points ∼8% -76%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1000 Points ∼23% -32%
Motorola Moto G5s
848 Points ∼20% -43%
BQ Aquaris X
1333 Points ∼31% -10%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
3117 Points ∼22%
Honor 9 Lite
3117 Points ∼22% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3015 Points ∼21% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points ∼17% -24%
Motorola Moto G5s
1871 Points ∼13% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
3732 Points ∼13%
Honor 9 Lite
3730 Points ∼13% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3631 Points ∼13% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points ∼13% +1%
Motorola Moto G5s
2270 Points ∼8% -39%
BQ Aquaris X
4522 Points ∼16% +21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
946 Points ∼16%
Honor 9 Lite
945 Points ∼16% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
914 Points ∼15% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points ∼12% -22%
Motorola Moto G5s
630 Points ∼11% -33%
BQ Aquaris X
929 Points ∼16% -2%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
1827 Points ∼50%
Honor 9 Lite
1748 Points ∼48% -4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1532 Points ∼42% -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1527 Points ∼42% -16%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points ∼41% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1670 Points ∼46% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
1199 Points ∼33% -34%
BQ Aquaris X
2179 Points ∼59% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
256 Points ∼5%
Honor 9 Lite
253 Points ∼5% -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
321 Points ∼6% +25%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
289 Points ∼5% +13%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points ∼4% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
253 Points ∼5% -1%
Motorola Moto G5s
243 Points ∼5% -5%
BQ Aquaris X
380 Points ∼7% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
316 Points ∼7%
Honor 9 Lite
312 Points ∼7% -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
389 Points ∼8% +23%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
353 Points ∼7% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points ∼5% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
312 Points ∼7% -1%
Motorola Moto G5s
295 Points ∼6% -7%
BQ Aquaris X
465 Points ∼10% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
1787 Points ∼49%
Honor 9 Lite
1788 Points ∼49% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1547 Points ∼42% -13%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1667 Points ∼46% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points ∼42% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1699 Points ∼47% -5%
Motorola Moto G5s
1158 Points ∼32% -35%
BQ Aquaris X
2139 Points ∼59% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
229 Points ∼3%
Honor 9 Lite
184 Points ∼2% -20%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
516 Points ∼6% +125%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
532 Points ∼6% +132%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points ∼3% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
407 Points ∼5% +78%
Motorola Moto G5s
483 Points ∼6% +111%
BQ Aquaris X
724 Points ∼9% +216%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
284 Points ∼4%
Honor 9 Lite
230 Points ∼4% -19%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
606 Points ∼10% +113%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
627 Points ∼10% +121%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points ∼5% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
490 Points ∼8% +73%
Motorola Moto G5s
555 Points ∼9% +95%
BQ Aquaris X
849 Points ∼13% +199%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
14930 Points ∼19%
Honor 9 Lite
14780 Points ∼19% -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
13590 Points ∼17% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
11780 Points ∼15% -21%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points ∼16% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12954 Points ∼16% -13%
Motorola Moto G5s
9045 Points ∼11% -39%
BQ Aquaris X
17124 Points ∼22% +15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
11262 Points ∼2%
Honor 9 Lite
11712 Points ∼2% +4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11147 Points ∼2% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
9936 Points ∼2% -12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points ∼2% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7793 Points ∼2% -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
9626 Points ∼2% -15%
BQ Aquaris X
13330 Points ∼3% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
11912 Points ∼6%
Honor 9 Lite
12278 Points ∼6% +3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11611 Points ∼6% -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
10294 Points ∼5% -14%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points ∼4% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
8550 Points ∼4% -28%
Motorola Moto G5s
9491 Points ∼5% -20%
BQ Aquaris X
14034 Points ∼7% +18%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
19 fps ∼1%
Honor 9 Lite
19 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
18 fps ∼1% -5%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
16 fps ∼1% -16%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼1% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12 fps ∼1% -37%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼1% -16%
BQ Aquaris X
23 fps ∼1% +21%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
18 fps ∼4%
Honor 9 Lite
18 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
19 fps ∼4% +6%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
16 fps ∼3% -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼3% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
19 fps ∼4% +6%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼3% -11%
BQ Aquaris X
22 fps ∼5% +22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
8.7 fps ∼2%
Honor 9 Lite
8.6 fps ∼2% -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
7.9 fps ∼1% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
7.3 fps ∼1% -16%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5 fps ∼1% -43%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.1 fps ∼1% -18%
BQ Aquaris X
9.8 fps ∼2% +13%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
8.3 fps ∼2%
Honor 9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼2% +1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8.5 fps ∼2% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
6.7 fps ∼2% -19%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9.8 fps ∼3% +18%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.4 fps ∼2% -11%
BQ Aquaris X
9.7 fps ∼3% +17%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
5.3 fps ∼1%
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼1% -40%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4.6 fps ∼1% -13%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4.8 fps ∼1% -9%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.3 fps ∼1% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.2 fps ∼1% -40%
Motorola Moto G5s
4.6 fps ∼1% -13%
BQ Aquaris X
6.4 fps ∼1% +21%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
5.2 fps ∼3%
Honor 9 Lite
5 fps ∼3% -4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
5 fps ∼3% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4.5 fps ∼3% -13%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.2 fps ∼2% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7.3 fps ∼4% +40%
Motorola Moto G5s
5 fps ∼3% -4%
BQ Aquaris X
6.3 fps ∼4% +21%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
3.2 fps ∼1%
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
2.8 fps ∼1% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2.9 fps ∼1% -9%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼0% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1.9 fps ∼0% -41%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.5 fps ∼1% -22%
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps ∼1% +9%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei P smart
2.9 fps ∼2%
Honor 9 Lite
2.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3 fps ∼3% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2.7 fps ∼2% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼2% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.9 fps ∼3% +34%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.7 fps ∼2% -7%
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps ∼3% +21%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (ordina per valore)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4.33 fps ∼11%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (ordina per valore)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8323 Points ∼19%
Medium Quality (ordina per valore)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
15988 Points ∼36%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
145 Points ∼8%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (ordina per valore)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
43 fps ∼70%

Legenda

 
Huawei P smart HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite 2017 HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
30.233 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
29.499 Points ∼98% +11%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
27.096 Points ∼90% +2%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
26.63 Points ∼88%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
26.42 Points ∼87% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
25.972 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
23.281 Points ∼77% -13%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
18.661 Points ∼62% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
5096 Points ∼100% +13%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
4786 Points ∼94% +6%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
4742 Points ∼93% +5%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
4630 Points ∼91% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4560 Points ∼89% +1%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
4497 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
3799 Points ∼75% -16%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
3035 Points ∼60% -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
13057 ms * ∼100% -35%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
10250.4 ms * ∼79% -6%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
9698.2 ms * ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
9669.2 ms * ∼74% -0%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
8825.1 ms * ∼68% +9%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
8768.2 ms * ∼67% +10%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
8693.6 ms * ∼67% +10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6820.9 ms * ∼52% +30%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
108 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
104 Points ∼96% +13%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
92 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
75 Points ∼69% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
64 Points ∼59% -30%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
62 Points ∼57% -33%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
61 Points ∼56% -34%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Huawei P smartHonor 9 LiteHuawei P8 lite 2017Huawei Mate 10 LiteSamsung Galaxy J7 2017Samsung Galaxy A3 2017Motorola Moto G5sBQ Aquaris X
AndroBench 3-5
39%
-50%
-27%
-36%
-41%
4%
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
32.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-56%
35.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-51%
63.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
50.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-31%
62.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
53.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-35%
69.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
75.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-8%
84.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
84.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
Random Write 4KB
21.3
66.83
214%
8
-62%
15.26
-28%
10.54
-51%
9.62
-55%
46.2
117%
11.85
-44%
Random Read 4KB
66.11
68.39
3%
38.7
-41%
31.5
-52%
25.86
-61%
22.32
-66%
40.6
-39%
37.47
-43%
Sequential Write 256KB
121.07
138.21
14%
42
-65%
99.79
-18%
52.98
-56%
45.96
-62%
77.5
-36%
75.34
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB
269.36
269.56
0%
165.8
-38%
286.78
6%
198.47
-26%
199.68
-26%
259
-4%
266.37
-1%
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high58 fps
in confronto
Motorola Moto X Play (min)
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
20
   ...
Google Pixel XL 2016
 821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
58
HTC One A9s
 Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2
58
Huawei P smart
 Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
58
Apple iPhone X
 A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU
59
HTC U11 Plus
 835, Adreno 540
59
   ...
Sony Xperia XA2 (max)
 630, Adreno 508
60
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high18 fps
in confronto
Lenovo B (min)
 MT6735M, Mali-T720
10
   ...
Honor 9 Lite
 Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
16
Lenovo Tab 4 8
 425, Adreno 308
18
Huawei P smart
 Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
18
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
 400 MSM8928, Adreno 305
18
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1
18
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48

no benchmarks found

Carico massimo
 35.5 °C35.7 °C34.6 °C 
 35.7 °C34.7 °C34.7 °C 
 34 °C34 °C35.3 °C 
Massima: 35.7 °C
Media: 34.9 °C
30.3 °C31.8 °C33.2 °C
30.6 °C31.8 °C34.1 °C
31 °C31.2 °C32.8 °C
Massima: 34.1 °C
Media: 31.9 °C
Alimentazione (max)  26.6 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.239.92532.935.73137.238.44031.738.45039.6436328.3328027.332.110026.932.712526.735.21602433.120020.939.125020.943.931519.546.340018.555.750017.560.163017.561.780015.761.8100015.867125016.671.2160015.870.7200015.472250015.570.131501674.1400015.87950001677.1630016.372.8800016.3731000016.273.41250016.467.41600016.457.6SPL28.685.2N1.157.7median 16.4Huawei P smartmedian 67Delta2.111.835.242.632.941.437.237.631.739.639.637.828.331.827.330.626.931.226.729.92432.820.939.620.945.819.549.818.557.317.558.417.559.815.762.315.866.216.66915.870.415.472.415.574.81676.415.878.31676.116.374.616.376.816.279.916.472.716.460.428.686.51.162.1median 16.4Huawei Mate 10 Litemedian 66.22.112.631.630.825.430.525.331.232.930.733.631.731.628.828.422.6272620.836.82240.221.349.220.853.721.257.119.462.619.567.417.767.817.969.517.870.717.372.117.474.616.775.217.275.518.277.917.981.417.67917.775.617.875.417.971.318.162.618.255.83087.11.370.5median 17.9Samsung Galaxy J7 2017median 69.51.310.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei P smart audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.62 / 1.76 / 1.87 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 4.47 / 6.39 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Power Consumption
-2%
-42%
-9%
46%
55%
4%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
0.62
0.85
-37%
1.44
-132%
0.87
-40%
0.39
37%
0.37
40%
0.67
-8%
1.12
-81%
Idle Average *
1.76
2
-14%
2.47
-40%
2.14
-22%
1.06
40%
0.78
56%
1.4
20%
2.16
-23%
Idle Maximum *
1.87
2.04
-9%
2.58
-38%
2.16
-16%
1.08
42%
0.84
55%
1.52
19%
2.18
-17%
Load Average *
4.47
3.23
28%
4.55
-2%
3.7
17%
1.82
59%
1.52
66%
4.56
-2%
2.94
34%
Load Maximum *
6.39
4.93
23%
6.3
1%
5.48
14%
3.21
50%
2.75
57%
7.05
-10%
5.1
20%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
16ore 25minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 64)
9ore 25minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10ore 15minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
3ore 22minuti
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
8%
22%
0%
99%
108%
8%
5%
Reader / Idle
985
965
-2%
1326
35%
1150
17%
1950
98%
2862
191%
1233
25%
H.264
615
622
1%
644
5%
502
-18%
1096
78%
988
61%
645
5%
WiFi v1.3
565
601
6%
604
7%
520
-8%
904
60%
668
18%
518
-8%
592
5%
Load
202
253
25%
283
40%
223
10%
525
160%
532
163%
225
11%

Pro

+ performance adeguate
+ Android 8
+ ultima versione di EMUI
+ dual SIM
+ decente rapporto dimensioni schermo
+ splitscreen
+ lettore impronte con funzionalità aggiuntive
+ fotocamera principale dual con effetto bokeh
+ selfies con effetto bokeh
+ DisplayPort
+ cuffie

Contro

- mancano importanti bande 3G e 4G LTE (in particolare quelle degli USA)
- manca un ac-Wi-Fi
- cassa mono
- nessuna USB-C
- resiste poco
- lettore di impronte posteriore inutilizzabile quando il telefono si trova poggiato su una superficie
- case sensibile alle ditate


Recensione: Huawei P Smart (FIG-LX1). Modello fornito da Huawei Germany.
Recensione: Huawei P Smart (FIG-LX1). Modello fornito da Huawei Germany.

Lo Huawei P Smart è come una campagna immagine per gli smartphones di fascia media. Le elevate specifiche hardware come CPU, GPU, o capacità sono assimilabili a quelle di smartphones come P8 Lite, Mate 10 Lite, ed Honor 9 Lite. Il Mate 10 Lite offre più RAM e spazio di archiviazione, ma è anche più costoso rispetto al P Smart. E diversamente dal Mate 10 Lite il P Smart non è soggetto ad un confronto diretto con un modello top che porta lo stesso nome. Di conseguenza, la domanda su come classificare questo dispositivo può trovare risposta nella parte migliore della fascia media.

Lo Huawei P Smart è un decente smartphone di fascia media senza ambizioni di contrastare le più potenti ammiraglie.

Il rapporto prezzo-performance è decente, e lo stesso vale per le performance complessive - non è di certo il più veloce, ma sicuramente si colloca nella parte alta della classifica. Sistema operativo ed EMUI sono aggiornati. Lo chassis high-quality è in alluminio ed ha un buon rapporto schermo-dimensioni che rispecchia le ambizioni dello P Smart, ma senza nascondere le due principali pecche: il numero limitati di frequenze e l'autonomia limitata sotto sforzo.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Huawei P smart - 02/25/2018 v6
Inge Schwabe

Chassis
89%
Tastiera
70 / 75 → 94%
Dispositivo di puntamento
91%
Connettività
39 / 60 → 65%
Peso
93%
Batteria
84%
Display
86%
Prestazioni di gioco
20 / 63 → 32%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
52 / 70 → 75%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Fotocamera
72%
Media
74%
83%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei P Smart
Inge Schwabe, 2018-03-10 (Update: 2018-03-10)