Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei Mate 10 Lite

Daniel Schmidt (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 12/07/2017

Pesante mainstream. A parte la dimensione del display, lo Huawei Mate 10 Lite non ha molto in comune con il suo omonimo, il Mate 10 Pro. Il Lite costa meno della metà rispetto al Pro ed è uno smartphone di fascia media molto attraente. La nostra recensione mostra non solo i punti di forza, ma anche le pecche.

Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Mate Serie)
Processore
HiSilicon Kirin 659
Scheda grafica
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
5.9 pollici 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, FullView, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51.49 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: kombinierte Kopfhörer- und Mikrofonklinke, Lettore schede: microSD bis zu 128 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Annährungs- und Beschleunigungssensor, Kompass, Power Delivery, OTG,
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800 und 1.900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 5 und 8), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8 und 20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.5 x 156.2 x 75.2
Batteria
3340 mAh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 16 MPix + 2 MPix (Autofokus, PDAF, Panorama-Modus, HDR, Full-HD-Video)
Fotocamera Secondaria: 13 MPix + 2 MPix (Full-HD-Video)
Altre caratteristiche
Tastiera: virtuell, Netzteil, USB-Kabel, Kopfhörer, Schutzhülle, Schnellstartanleitung, EMUI 5.1, 24 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
164 gr, Alimentazione: 50 gr
Prezzo
349 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s ∼100% +704%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼84% +575%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼73% +489%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼72% +478%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼64% +411%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41.9 MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
298 MBit/s ∼100% +459%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 MBit/s ∼87% +386%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼56% +213%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼50% +178%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼47% +163%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 MBit/s ∼18%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Huawei Mate 10 Lite

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
466
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 497 cd/m² Media: 456.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.88 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 89 %
Al centro con la batteria: 467 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1557:1 (Nero: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.15
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC U Ultra
SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Screen
42%
-2%
-38%
-13%
13%
Brightness middle
467
539
15%
470
1%
458
-2%
328
-30%
550
18%
Brightness
457
542
19%
445
-3%
473
4%
334
-27%
535
17%
Brightness Distribution
89
93
4%
88
-1%
88
-1%
88
-1%
92
3%
Black Level *
0.3
0.22
27%
0.51
-70%
0.42
-40%
Contrast
1557
2136
37%
898
-42%
1310
-16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5
1.6
68%
5.5
-10%
7.1
-42%
4.6
8%
3.3
34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.2
2.6
68%
11.9
-45%
14.5
-77%
14.7
-79%
4.5
45%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.1
1.5
75%
7.6
-25%
10.5
-72%
2.8
54%
3.6
41%
Gamma
2.15 112%
2.28 105%
2.2 109%
2.28 105%
2.29 105%
2.38 101%
CCT
7961 82%
6422 101%
7454 87%
8951 73%
6612 98%
7226 90%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms Incremento
↘ 15.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms Incremento
↘ 23.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.6 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
63195 Points ∼27%
Huawei Nova 2
63304 Points ∼27% 0%
HTC U Ultra
139017 Points ∼60% +120%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼29% +5%
Honor 9
150276 Points ∼65% +138%
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼53% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼26% -4%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4847 Points ∼47%
Huawei Nova 2
4822 Points ∼47% -1%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼51% +8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼48% +1%
Honor 9
6113 Points ∼59% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points ∼39% -16%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
6024 Points ∼59%
Huawei Nova 2
6252 Points ∼61% +4%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼51% -13%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼57% -2%
Honor 9
7034 Points ∼69% +17%
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼48% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼49% -16%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
753 Points ∼44%
Huawei Nova 2
847 Points ∼50% +12%
HTC U Ultra
907 Points ∼53% +20%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼48% +7%
Honor 9
1069 Points ∼63% +42%
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼57% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼39% -12%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
849 Points ∼9%
Huawei Nova 2
843 Points ∼9% -1%
HTC U Ultra
4591 Points ∼50% +441%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼11% +19%
Honor 9
4126 Points ∼45% +386%
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼50% +445%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼17% +80%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1998 Points ∼45%
Huawei Nova 2
2011 Points ∼45% +1%
HTC U Ultra
1581 Points ∼36% -21%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼24% -48%
Honor 9
3258 Points ∼74% +63%
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼34% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼34% -25%
System (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2983 Points ∼29%
Huawei Nova 2
2959 Points ∼29% -1%
HTC U Ultra
2834 Points ∼28% -5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼34% +17%
Honor 9
4154 Points ∼40% +39%
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼32% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼25% -13%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1398 Points ∼32%
Huawei Nova 2
1436 Points ∼33% +3%
HTC U Ultra
2078 Points ∼48% +49%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼31% -6%
Honor 9
2779 Points ∼65% +99%
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼50% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼33% +1%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3631 Points ∼13%
Huawei Nova 2
3556 Points ∼12% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼15% +20%
Honor 9
6527 Points ∼23% +80%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
914 Points ∼15%
Huawei Nova 2
918 Points ∼15% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼16% +2%
Honor 9
1869 Points ∼31% +104%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3508 Points ∼13%
Huawei Nova 2
3438 Points ∼12% -2%
HTC U Ultra
3983 Points ∼14% +14%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4362 Points ∼16% +24%
ZTE Axon 7
3867 Points ∼14% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4098 Points ∼15% +17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
889 Points ∼15%
Huawei Nova 2
887 Points ∼15% 0%
HTC U Ultra
1643 Points ∼28% +85%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
889 Points ∼15% 0%
ZTE Axon 7
1280 Points ∼22% +44%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
775 Points ∼13% -13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1527 Points ∼42%
Huawei Nova 2
1662 Points ∼45% +9%
HTC U Ultra
1763 Points ∼48% +15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼58% +40%
Honor 9
2287 Points ∼62% +50%
ZTE Axon 7
1783 Points ∼49% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼47% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
289 Points ∼5%
Huawei Nova 2
330 Points ∼6% +14%
HTC U Ultra
2405 Points ∼45% +732%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼7% +31%
Honor 9
2798 Points ∼52% +868%
ZTE Axon 7
2528 Points ∼47% +775%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼13% +146%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
353 Points ∼7%
Huawei Nova 2
402 Points ∼8% +14%
HTC U Ultra
2225 Points ∼47% +530%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼10% +31%
Honor 9
2666 Points ∼56% +655%
ZTE Axon 7
2500 Points ∼53% +608%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼17% +131%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1667 Points ∼46%
Huawei Nova 2
1657 Points ∼45% -1%
HTC U Ultra
1646 Points ∼45% -1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼58% +28%
Honor 9
1809 Points ∼50% +9%
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼30% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼48% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
532 Points ∼6%
Huawei Nova 2
526 Points ∼6% -1%
HTC U Ultra
3807 Points ∼46% +616%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼9% +36%
Honor 9
2990 Points ∼36% +462%
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼56% +768%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼13% +98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
627 Points ∼10%
Huawei Nova 2
620 Points ∼10% -1%
HTC U Ultra
2947 Points ∼46% +370%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼13% +35%
Honor 9
2611 Points ∼41% +316%
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼42% +330%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼18% +84%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
11780 Points ∼15%
Huawei Nova 2
14488 Points ∼18% +23%
HTC U Ultra
21263 Points ∼27% +81%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼22% +45%
Honor 9
15150 Points ∼19% +29%
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼26% +73%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼17% +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
9936 Points ∼2%
Huawei Nova 2
11688 Points ∼2% +18%
HTC U Ultra
33446 Points ∼7% +237%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼3% +34%
Honor 9
38979 Points ∼8% +292%
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼5% +145%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼3% +34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
10294 Points ∼5%
Huawei Nova 2
12212 Points ∼6% +19%
HTC U Ultra
29668 Points ∼14% +188%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼7% +36%
Honor 9
28883 Points ∼14% +181%
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼11% +127%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼6% +29%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
16 fps ∼1%
Huawei Nova 2
19 fps ∼1% +19%
HTC U Ultra
74 fps ∼4% +363%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼1% +44%
Honor 9
60 fps ∼3% +275%
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps ∼5% +450%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼2% +113%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
16 fps ∼3%
Huawei Nova 2
20 fps ∼4% +25%
HTC U Ultra
46 fps ∼10% +188%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼5% +38%
Honor 9
55 fps ∼12% +244%
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps ∼12% +231%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼7% +106%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
7.3 fps ∼1%
Huawei Nova 2
7.9 fps ∼1% +8%
HTC U Ultra
26 fps ∼5% +256%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼2% +34%
Honor 9
30 fps ∼5% +311%
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps ∼7% +434%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼3% +105%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
6.7 fps ∼2%
Huawei Nova 2
8.9 fps ∼2% +33%
HTC U Ultra
23 fps ∼6% +243%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼3% +43%
Honor 9
28 fps ∼8% +318%
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps ∼8% +318%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼4% +124%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4.8 fps ∼1%
Huawei Nova 2
4.8 fps ∼1% 0%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼2% +150%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼1% +33%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼4% +358%
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps ∼6% +546%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼2% +90%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4.5 fps ∼3%
Huawei Nova 2
5.2 fps ∼3% +16%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼7% +167%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼4% +40%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼13% +389%
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps ∼9% +256%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼5% +100%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2.9 fps ∼1%
Huawei Nova 2
2.9 fps ∼1% 0%
HTC U Ultra
15 fps ∼4% +417%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼1% +21%
Honor 9
15 fps ∼4% +417%
ZTE Axon 7
18 fps ∼5% +521%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼1% +79%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2.7 fps ∼2%
Huawei Nova 2
3.1 fps ∼3% +15%
HTC U Ultra
8.4 fps ∼7% +211%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼3% +30%
Honor 9
16 fps ∼14% +493%
ZTE Axon 7
9.8 fps ∼8% +263%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼4% +93%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
4.96 fps ∼13%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
8749 Points ∼20%
Medium Quality (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
17001 Points ∼38%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
147 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
258 Points ∼14%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
47.3 fps ∼77%

Legenda

 
Huawei Mate 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Nova 2 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points ∼100% +94%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
45.084 Points ∼77% +49%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
44.754 Points ∼76% +48%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.222 Points ∼55% +7%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
30.233 Points ∼52%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
27.692 Points ∼47% -8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼46% -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points ∼100% +100%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8062 Points ∼79% +58%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
5511 Points ∼54% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points ∼51% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
5096 Points ∼50%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
4864 Points ∼48% -5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼43% -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
8863 ms * ∼100% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
8693.6 ms * ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442.4 ms * ∼73% +26%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
4141 ms * ∼47% +52%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * ∼36% +64%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
3096.5 ms * ∼35% +64%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
111 Points ∼100% +7%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points ∼96% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
104 Points ∼94%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
95 Points ∼86% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points ∼80% -14%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼77% -17%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Huawei Mate 10 LiteSamsung Galaxy A5 2017HTC U UltraBQ Aquaris X ProZTE Axon 7Honor 9
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
64%
15%
74%
49%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
35.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
58%
67.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
91%
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
41%
51.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45%
34.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
69.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
7%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20%
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
14%
78.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
13%
67.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
Random Write 4KB
15.26
12.13
-21%
13.7
-10%
12.07
-21%
16.22
6%
32.7
114%
Random Read 4KB
31.5
22.41
-29%
84.2
167%
37.97
21%
121.07
284%
55.7
77%
Sequential Write 256KB
99.79
77.1
-23%
164.7
65%
139.63
40%
150.92
51%
204
104%
Sequential Read 256KB
286.78
182.03
-37%
423.9
48%
270.46
-6%
406.49
42%
293
2%
Real Racing 3
 SettaggiValore
 high26 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high22 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high30 fps
Carico massimo
 34.8 °C33.9 °C34.5 °C 
 34.1 °C34.4 °C35.5 °C 
 33.1 °C33.2 °C35.4 °C 
Massima: 35.5 °C
Media: 34.3 °C
29.5 °C30.2 °C31.3 °C
29.7 °C30 °C31.2 °C
30.3 °C31.1 °C31.1 °C
Massima: 31.3 °C
Media: 30.5 °C
Alimentazione (max)  22.8 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
The maximum temp on the upper side is 35.5 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Smartphone.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.242.62532.941.43137.237.64031.739.65039.637.86328.331.88027.330.610026.931.212526.729.91602432.820020.939.625020.945.831519.549.840018.557.350017.558.463017.559.880015.762.3100015.866.2125016.669160015.870.4200015.472.4250015.574.831501676.4400015.878.350001676.1630016.374.6800016.376.81000016.279.91250016.472.71600016.460.4SPL28.686.5N1.162.1median 16.4Huawei Mate 10 Litemedian 66.2Delta2.112.630.929.330.926.229.126.228.627.828.629.832.629.828.826.728.82628.8262424.92424.824.724.830.722.130.729.220.829.236.120.136.141.719.841.748.72148.753.321.753.357.420.557.462.62162.662.118.462.165.71765.767.717.367.766.915.266.970.315.570.371.21571.27314.97378.515.178.581.314.681.373.914.673.973.114.673.17214.6726014.66048.214.648.28628.88657.31.257.3median 62.6HTC U Ultramedian 17median 62.612.2312.231.641.125.44025.336.732.93633.635.631.630.628.432.92733.820.841.72244.421.348.420.850.521.256.619.462.519.566.217.766.117.974.217.877.317.374.317.473.816.771.817.269.318.269.517.966.517.661.417.755.817.854.517.959.918.152.218.249.530831.350.1median 17.9Samsung Galaxy A5 2017median 61.41.39.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Mate 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC U Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.11 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.87 / 2.14 / 2.16 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.7 / 5.48 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
20%
-38%
6%
-24%
-1%
33%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.78
10%
1
-15%
0.67
23%
1.13
-30%
0.64
26%
0.64
26%
Idle Average *
2.14
1.1
49%
2.41
-13%
1.7
21%
2.25
-5%
0.84
61%
1.36
36%
Idle Maximum *
2.16
1.16
46%
2.46
-14%
1.78
18%
2.3
-6%
0.87
60%
1.4
35%
Load Average *
3.7
4.15
-12%
6.8
-84%
4.42
-19%
4.89
-32%
6.02
-63%
2.53
32%
Load Maximum *
5.48
5.12
7%
8.9
-62%
6.3
-15%
7.99
-46%
10.45
-91%
3.63
34%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
19ore 10minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 62)
8ore 40minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8ore 22minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
3ore 43minuti
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
94%
15%
36%
20%
15%
Reader / Idle
1150
2418
110%
1568
36%
1840
60%
1735
51%
1399
22%
H.264
502
984
96%
605
21%
644
28%
704
40%
564
12%
WiFi v1.3
520
843
62%
546
5%
730
40%
411
-21%
516
-1%
Load
223
467
109%
214
-4%
254
14%
245
10%
278
25%

Pro

+ case high-quality in alluminio
+ due dual camera
+ spazio espandibile
+ dual SIM
+ decente GPS
+ decenti prestazioni di sistema

Contro

- no NFC
- no aptX
- no ac Wi-Fi
- scarse le prestazioni della GPU
Recensione: Huawei Mate 10 Lite. Modello fornito da Huawei Germany.
Recensione: Huawei Mate 10 Lite. Modello fornito da Huawei Germany.

Il più piccolo ed economico membro della famiglia Mate 10 risulta davvero interessante. Sfortunatamente, la concorrenza è immensa, e l'unica feature del Mate 10 Lite è il display 18:9 da 5.9" con un eccellente rapporto schermo-dimensioni. Ulteriori features includono la SIM ibrida, 4 GB di RAM, 64 GB di spazio interno espandibile tramite microSD, e dual cameras su entrambi i lati del telefono. Nel complesso, il pacchetto sembra una versione più grande del Nova 2, ed abbiamo apprezzato di più la fotocamera frontale del Mate 10 Lite rispetto ai megapixel della versione posteriore.

A parte il nome, il Mate 10 Lite ha poco in comune con la serie Mate in generale. Ma resta uno smartphone buono.

Dimensioni dello schermo a parte l'Huawei Mate 10 Lite ha poco in comune con gli altri due membri della famiglia Mate. Manca l'NFC, la batteria è più piccola, il SoC è molto più lento, la dual camera Leica non mostra un setup, aptX per audio high-resolution Bluetooth manca e invece della Super Charge supporta solo la QuickCharge.

Considerando il tutto, resta uno smartphone decente, in particolare per coloro che preferiscono un dispositivo con uno schermo grande. Avremmo preferito meno compromessi rispetto ai due modelli più grandi, e l'autonomia poteva essere superiore.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Huawei Mate 10 Lite - 11/27/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
87%
Tastiera
72 / 75 → 96%
Dispositivo di puntamento
92%
Connettività
37 / 60 → 61%
Peso
91%
Batteria
90%
Display
85%
Prestazioni di gioco
21 / 63 → 33%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
52 / 70 → 74%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Fotocamera
75%
Media
74%
84%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-12- 7 (Update: 2017-12- 8)