Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei Nova 2

Manuel Masiero (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 10/08/2017

Selfie superstar? Huawei ha creato un telefono di fascia medio-alta da 5" con il Nova 2 e gli ha dato una feature speciale con la fotocamera frontale da 20 MP. Vediamo se gli appassionati di selfie devono averlo a tutti i costi.

Huawei Nova 2 (Nova Serie)
Processore
HiSilicon Kirin 659
Scheda grafica
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
5 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 443 PPI, capacitive, Full-HD, LTPS, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48.4 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: jack combinato cuffie microfono 3,5 mm, Lettore schede: schede microSD fino a 128 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: sensore impronte, sensore prossimità, bussola digitale, sensore gravità, giroscopio, USB-OTG, BT aptX
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM-Quadband (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS-Quadband (800, 850, 900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (800, 850, 900, 1.800, 2.100, 2.600 MHz), Downloads up to 300 MBit/s, Uploads up to 50 MBit/s, Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 6.9 x 142.2 x 68.9
Batteria
2950 mAh polimeri di litio, Tempo conversazione 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 18 ore, Tempo conversazione 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 18 ore, Standby 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 400 ore, Standby 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 400 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 12 MPix F/1.8, LED flash, pixel size 1.25 µm
Fotocamera Secondaria: 20 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: cassa mono, Tastiera: virtuale, alimentatore, cavo USB, cuffie, custodia protettiva, tool SIM, guida rapida, EMUI 5.1, 24 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
143 gr, Alimentazione: 35 gr
Prezzo
399 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼100% +457%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼87% +385%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼76% +324%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼74% +315%
Huawei Nova 2
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s ∼18%
Huawei Nova
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20 MBit/s ∼6% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 MBit/s ∼100% +245%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼85% +193%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼57% +97%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼54% +87%
Huawei Nova 2
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
75 MBit/s ∼29%
Huawei Nova
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.9 MBit/s ∼20% -32%
Huawei Nova 2: Whole route
Huawei Nova 2: Whole route
Huawei Nova 2: Turning point
Huawei Nova 2: Turning point
Huawei Nova 2: Bridge
Huawei Nova 2: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Whole route
Garmin Edge 500: Whole route
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
484
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 496 cd/m² Media: 487.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.45 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 97 %
Al centro con la batteria: 481 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1002:1 (Nero: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.31
Huawei Nova 2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
HTC U Ultra
SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Huawei Nova
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Screen
-20%
22%
22%
-4%
46%
13%
Brightness
487
473
-3%
535
10%
445
-9%
366
-25%
611
25%
485
0%
Brightness Distribution
97
88
-9%
92
-5%
88
-9%
87
-10%
89
-8%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.48
0.51
-6%
0.42
12%
0.22
54%
0.23
52%
0.44
8%
Contrast
1002
898
-10%
1310
31%
2136
113%
2809
180%
1120
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.2
7.1
-37%
3.3
37%
5.5
-6%
5.1
2%
4.5
13%
4.2
19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.8
10.5
-54%
3.6
47%
7.6
-12%
5.5
19%
6
12%
3.8
44%
Gamma
2.31 104%
2.28 105%
2.38 101%
2.2 109%
2.24 107%
2.27 106%
2.39 100%
CCT
8149 80%
8951 73%
7226 90%
7454 87%
7388 88%
7996 81%
7438 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 56 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7499 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms Incremento
↘ 13.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms Incremento
↘ 28.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.7 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
63304 Points ∼28%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼29% +5%
Honor 9
150276 Points ∼66% +137%
HTC U Ultra
139017 Points ∼61% +120%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points ∼43% +55%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% +140%
Huawei Nova
63206 Points ∼28% 0%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
4822 Points ∼71%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼72% +2%
Honor 9
6113 Points ∼90% +27%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼76% +8%
LG G6
5152 Points ∼75% +7%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
6252 Points ∼75%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼71% -6%
Honor 9
7034 Points ∼85% +13%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼63% -17%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points ∼86% +15%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼69% -9%
Huawei Nova
4596 Points ∼55% -26%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
847 Points ∼55%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼52% -5%
Honor 9
1069 Points ∼69% +26%
HTC U Ultra
907 Points ∼59% +7%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points ∼68% +24%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼70% +27%
Huawei Nova
727 Points ∼47% -14%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
843 Points ∼10%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼12% +20%
Honor 9
4126 Points ∼48% +389%
HTC U Ultra
4591 Points ∼53% +445%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points ∼18% +79%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼60% +509%
Huawei Nova
1006 Points ∼12% +19%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
2011 Points ∼45%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼24% -48%
Honor 9
3258 Points ∼74% +62%
HTC U Ultra
1581 Points ∼36% -21%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points ∼60% +33%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼44% -4%
Huawei Nova
1531 Points ∼35% -24%
System (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
2959 Points ∼45%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼53% +18%
Honor 9
4154 Points ∼63% +40%
HTC U Ultra
2834 Points ∼43% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points ∼60% +33%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼55% +23%
Huawei Nova
2280 Points ∼35% -23%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
1436 Points ∼38%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼35% -8%
Honor 9
2779 Points ∼73% +94%
HTC U Ultra
2078 Points ∼55% +45%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points ∼53% +41%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼66% +74%
Huawei Nova
1264 Points ∼33% -12%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
2997 Points ∼35%
Honor 9
Points ∼0% -100%
LG G6
7080 Points ∼83% +136%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
3556 Points ∼14%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼17% +23%
Honor 9
6527 Points ∼26% +84%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼17% +23%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
918 Points ∼15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼16% +1%
Honor 9
1869 Points ∼31% +104%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼31% +99%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
1662 Points ∼55%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼70% +28%
Honor 9
2287 Points ∼76% +38%
HTC U Ultra
1763 Points ∼58% +6%
Huawei P9 Plus
2547 Points ∼84% +53%
LG G6
1955 Points ∼65% +18%
Huawei Nova
1802 Points ∼60% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
330 Points ∼6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼7% +15%
Honor 9
2798 Points ∼52% +748%
HTC U Ultra
2405 Points ∼45% +629%
Huawei P9 Plus
807 Points ∼15% +145%
LG G6
2980 Points ∼55% +803%
Huawei Nova
391 Points ∼7% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
402 Points ∼10%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼12% +15%
Honor 9
2666 Points ∼69% +563%
HTC U Ultra
2225 Points ∼57% +453%
Huawei P9 Plus
952 Points ∼25% +137%
LG G6
2669 Points ∼69% +564%
Huawei Nova
473 Points ∼12% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
1657 Points ∼55%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼71% +28%
Honor 9
1809 Points ∼60% +9%
HTC U Ultra
1646 Points ∼55% -1%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points ∼78% +41%
LG G6
1961 Points ∼65% +18%
Huawei Nova
1821 Points ∼60% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
526 Points ∼7%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼9% +38%
Honor 9
2990 Points ∼39% +468%
HTC U Ultra
3807 Points ∼49% +624%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points ∼13% +98%
LG G6
4121 Points ∼53% +683%
Huawei Nova
737 Points ∼10% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
620 Points ∼12%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼17% +37%
Honor 9
2611 Points ∼52% +321%
HTC U Ultra
2947 Points ∼59% +375%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points ∼24% +92%
LG G6
3282 Points ∼66% +429%
Huawei Nova
849 Points ∼17% +37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
14488 Points ∼20%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼24% +18%
Honor 9
15150 Points ∼21% +5%
HTC U Ultra
21263 Points ∼30% +47%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points ∼21% +6%
LG G6
22335 Points ∼31% +54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
11688 Points ∼3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼3% +14%
Honor 9
38979 Points ∼9% +233%
HTC U Ultra
33446 Points ∼7% +186%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points ∼5% +87%
LG G6
32128 Points ∼7% +175%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
12212 Points ∼6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼7% +14%
Honor 9
28883 Points ∼15% +137%
HTC U Ultra
29668 Points ∼15% +143%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points ∼10% +63%
LG G6
29276 Points ∼15% +140%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
19 fps ∼1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼2% +21%
Honor 9
60 fps ∼5% +216%
HTC U Ultra
74 fps ∼6% +289%
Huawei P9 Plus
41 fps ∼3% +116%
LG G6
75 fps ∼6% +295%
Huawei Nova
23 fps ∼2% +21%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
20 fps ∼4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼5% +10%
Honor 9
55 fps ∼12% +175%
HTC U Ultra
46 fps ∼10% +130%
Huawei P9 Plus
43 fps ∼9% +115%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% +130%
Huawei Nova
22 fps ∼5% +10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
7.9 fps ∼1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼2% +24%
Honor 9
30 fps ∼6% +280%
HTC U Ultra
26 fps ∼5% +229%
Huawei P9 Plus
18 fps ∼3% +128%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7% +381%
Huawei Nova
9.8 fps ∼2% +24%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
8.9 fps ∼2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼3% +8%
Honor 9
28 fps ∼8% +215%
HTC U Ultra
23 fps ∼6% +158%
Huawei P9 Plus
19 fps ∼5% +113%
LG G6
27 fps ∼7% +203%
Huawei Nova
10 fps ∼3% +12%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
4.8 fps ∼1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼2% +33%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼5% +358%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼3% +150%
Huawei P9 Plus
10 fps ∼2% +108%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% +504%
Huawei Nova
6.2 fps ∼1% +29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
5.2 fps ∼3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼4% +21%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼13% +323%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼7% +131%
Huawei P9 Plus
11 fps ∼6% +112%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% +208%
Huawei Nova
6.6 fps ∼4% +27%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
2.9 fps ∼1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼1% +21%
Honor 9
15 fps ∼4% +417%
HTC U Ultra
15 fps ∼4% +417%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.2 fps ∼2% +114%
LG G6
20 fps ∼6% +590%
Huawei Nova
3.4 fps ∼1% +17%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
3.1 fps ∼0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼0% +13%
Honor 9
16 fps ∼0% +416%
HTC U Ultra
8.4 fps ∼0% +171%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.8 fps ∼0% +119%
LG G6
11 fps ∼0% +255%
Huawei Nova
3.6 fps ∼0% +16%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
4.96 fps ∼14%
LG G6
24.34 fps ∼67% +391%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
8749 Points ∼20%
LG G6
35449 Points ∼80% +305%
Medium Quality (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
17001 Points ∼38%
LG G6
37621 Points ∼84% +121%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
147 Points ∼8%
LG G6
647 Points ∼35% +340%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova 2
47.3 fps ∼77%
LG G6
59 fps ∼96% +25%

Legenda

 
Huawei Nova 2 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei Nova Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
70 Points ∼100% +153%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points ∼84% +112%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
56.628 Points ∼81% +104%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
45.084 Points ∼64% +63%
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
30.487 Points ∼44% +10%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
27.692 Points ∼40%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼38% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
12058 Points ∼100% +148%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points ∼85% +110%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
9113 Points ∼76% +87%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
5511 Points ∼46% +13%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
4864 Points ∼40%
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
4717 Points ∼39% -3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼37% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
8863 ms * ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼99% +1%
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
8234.9 ms * ∼93% +7%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
4141 ms * ∼47% +53%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * ∼36% +64%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
2792.3 ms * ∼32% +68%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
2464.2 ms * ∼28% +72%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
130 Points ∼100% +37%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
122 Points ∼94% +28%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points ∼82% +13%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
95 Points ∼73%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼66% -9%
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
60 Points ∼46% -37%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Huawei Nova 2BQ Aquaris X ProHonor 9HTC U UltraHuawei P9 PlusLG G6Huawei Nova
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
2%
18%
-2%
12%
0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
36.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
37%
34.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
67.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
87%
24.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-31%
53.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
47%
47.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
32%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
68.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
14%
67.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20%
62.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
77.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
13%
79.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
15%
Random Write 4KB
25.41
12.07
-52%
32.7
29%
13.7
-46%
51.23
102%
16.58
-35%
44.63
76%
Random Read 4KB
69.03
37.97
-45%
55.7
-19%
84.2
22%
39.33
-43%
95.19
38%
38.19
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB
192.8
139.63
-28%
204
6%
164.7
-15%
140.38
-27%
122.85
-36%
75.01
-61%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.35
270.46
-10%
293
-2%
423.9
41%
284.27
-5%
428.67
43%
248.26
-17%
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high56 fps
in confronto
Motorola Moto X Play (min)
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
20
   ...
Lenovo Moto Z Play
 625, Adreno 506
56
Huawei P10 Plus
 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
56
Huawei Nova 2
 Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
56
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
57
Honor 6X
 Kirin 655, Mali-T830 MP2
57
   ...
OnePlus 5 (max)
 835, Adreno 540
60
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high28 fps
 very low30 fps
Carico massimo
 37.2 °C33.8 °C36.4 °C 
 37.6 °C34.1 °C39.6 °C 
 36 °C35.6 °C37.9 °C 
Massima: 39.6 °C
Media: 36.5 °C
33 °C33.1 °C35.8 °C
33.2 °C34.4 °C35.8 °C
33.1 °C34.1 °C35.6 °C
Massima: 35.8 °C
Media: 34.2 °C
Alimentazione (max)  30.6 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.631.22525.438.43125.330.14032.930.25033.631.96331.635.58028.424.51002726.912520.823.7160223920021.350.525020.849.531521.249.340019.458.250019.559.963017.763.680017.962.5100017.867125017.372.4160017.473.6200016.772.2250017.273.3315018.274.6400017.973.8500017.676.4630017.776.9800017.876.41000017.977.61250018.175.51600018.262.9SPL3085.7N1.361.9median 17.9Huawei Nova 2median 67Delta1.311.837.536.427.134.832.437.534.827.726.630.831.334.832.233.629.529.731.732.238.33634.933.72638.350.547.147.347.739.450.531.633.329.131.936.231.628.231.532.626.728.628.230.625.227.624.525.430.632.626.428.523.621.332.642.523.539.922.123.342.549.423.446.621.222.549.45524.65022.722.45559.531.553.326.121.359.563.528.755.421.818.463.567.126.358.620.117.567.169.230.256.820.317.569.270.337.65722.217.270.370.141.756.928.516.870.174.852.660.840.617.374.878.459.862.945.817.478.478.761.364.942.316.678.78265.166.247.517.38279.563.963.348.817.679.577.668.26248.917.677.67273.356.654.217.77261.673.24653.917.461.653.371.136.752.917.753.347.473.926.954.817.947.439.973.122.654.218.139.926.859.618.741.118.126.888.480.373.361.629.888.464.534.827.811.81.364.5median 63.5Huawei P9 Plusmedian 52.6median 55.4median 40.6median 17.7median 63.512.620.211.813.31.612.631.642.925.433.825.327.832.933.233.641.731.631.928.431.8272620.824.72228.621.336.520.85021.25519.45719.556.517.757.317.963.817.870.517.372.317.474.816.77817.276.918.279.417.981.417.678.217.774.217.873.917.968.618.170.818.2683088.31.366.5median 17.9Huawei Novamedian 68.61.312.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Nova 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.38 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Nova audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.25 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.17 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.59 / 1.71 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 4.61 / 5.84 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Nova 2
2950 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Huawei Nova
3020 mAh
Power Consumption
-4%
-39%
-50%
4%
-14%
3%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.67
-3%
1.13
-74%
1
-54%
0.87
-34%
0.62
5%
0.61
6%
Idle Average *
1.59
1.7
-7%
2.25
-42%
2.41
-52%
1.2
25%
1.43
10%
1.83
-15%
Idle Maximum *
1.71
1.78
-4%
2.3
-35%
2.46
-44%
1.27
26%
1.48
13%
1.86
-9%
Load Average *
4.61
4.42
4%
4.89
-6%
6.8
-48%
4.69
-2%
5.52
-20%
3.71
20%
Load Maximum *
5.84
6.3
-8%
7.99
-37%
8.9
-52%
5.63
4%
10.47
-79%
5.19
11%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
22ore 58minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
10ore 02minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11ore 51minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
4ore 32minuti
Huawei Nova 2
2950 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Huawei Nova
3020 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
10%
-8%
-8%
-0%
12%
26%
Reader / Idle
1378
1840
34%
1399
2%
1568
14%
1446
5%
1789
30%
1870
36%
H.264
711
644
-9%
564
-21%
605
-15%
776
9%
779
10%
717
1%
WiFi v1.3
602
730
21%
516
-14%
546
-9%
530
-12%
692
15%
873
45%
Load
272
254
-7%
278
2%
214
-21%
263
-3%
252
-7%
328
21%

Pro

+ case stiloso che ricorda l'iPhone
+ display luminoso
+ dual SIM
+ USB Type-C
+ Bluetooth 4.2 / aptX
+ molto spazio di archiviazione
+ prestazioni elevate
+ ampia autonomia
+ ricarica rapida

Contro

- solo dual SIM ibrida
- solo USB 2.0
- moderate performance Wi-Fi
- fotocamera mediocre
Recensione: Huawei Nova 2. Modello fornito da Huawei Germany.
Recensione: Huawei Nova 2. Modello fornito da Huawei Germany.

Con il Nova 2, Huawei ha realizzato un buon smartphone, che rientra nella fascia medio-alta. Questo 5" Android convince con la buona qualità di costruzione, si tiene bene in mano, e sembra un dispositivo high-end. Con 4 GB di RAM e l'ARM Mali-T830 MP2, il suo SoC HiSilicon Kirin 659 octa core ha prestazioni di sistema elevate e rende il Nova 2 un dispositivo tuttofare, che gestisce in modo fluido i siti web e i giochi impegnativi Android sul suo luminoso display Full-HD. Ulteriori punti positivi sono l'ampia autonomia, i tempi di ricarica bassi, e lo spazio di archiviazione abbondante, sebbene l'interfaccia utente EMUI Huawei occupi molto spazio.

Nonostante la fotocamera frontale da 20 MP, il Nova 2 non è un a "Selfie Superstar" come vorrebbe Huawei. Ha prestazioni buone ma non sorprendenti come fotocamera.

Potete usare la funzione dual SIM del Nova 2 solo se rinunciate ad usare una scheda microSD, in quanto si usa uno slot ibrido. Non è un problema serio, in quanto lo spazio interno non si riempie velocemente. Potreste lamentarvi anche che la porta USB Type-C supporta solo velocità 2.0. Sfortunatamente, la modesta velocità del Wi-Fi non dà una alternativa per scaricare velocemente i dati dallo smartphone. La fotocamera è un po' eludente. Non non è scarsa. Ma non soddisfa le attese elevate.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Huawei Nova 2 - 10/02/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Tastiera
69 / 75 → 92%
Dispositivo di puntamento
88%
Connettività
39 / 60 → 66%
Peso
93%
Batteria
93%
Display
85%
Prestazioni di gioco
22 / 63 → 35%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
53 / 70 → 75%
Temperatura
88%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Fotocamera
76%
Media
74%
84%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei Nova 2
Manuel Masiero, 2017-10- 8 (Update: 2017-10- 8)