Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei Nova Plus

Daniel Schmidt (traduzione a cura di G.DeLuca), 12/12/2016

Finalmente registrazione 4k! Lo Huawei Nova Plus lascia un'impressione premium nel segmento mainstream ed è il primo smartphone del produttore Cinese con registrazione video Ultra-HD. Tuttavia, Huawei non utilizza il proprio SoC Kirin, ma un chip Qualcomm. Come si comporta questo smartphone nel competitivo segmento fino a 400 Euro (~$432)?

Dispositivo di test fornito da Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Size Comparison

I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	337 MBit/s ∼100% +531%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	320 MBit/s ∼95% +499%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s ∼36% +127%
Huawei Nova Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53.4 MBit/s ∼16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32.9 MBit/s ∼10% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	323 MBit/s ∼100% +527%
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	298 MBit/s ∼92% +479%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	112 MBit/s ∼35% +117%
Huawei Nova Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	51.5 MBit/s ∼16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31.2 MBit/s ∼10% -39%

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click per caricare le immagini

Huawei Nova Plus

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Canon EOS 70D

click per caricare le immagini

Huawei Nova Plus

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Canon EOS 70D

click per caricare le immagini

Huawei Nova Plus

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Canon EOS 70D


488 cd/m²	480 cd/m²	461 cd/m²
499 cd/m²	485 cd/m²	456 cd/m²
504 cd/m²	490 cd/m²	465 cd/m²

Distribuzione della luminosità

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Massima: 504 cd/m² Media: 480.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.51 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 90 %
Al centro con la batteria: 485 cd/m²
Contrasto: 970:1 (Nero: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.36

	Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5	Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5	ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2	Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen		-8%	-9%	-1%	-20%	22%	25%
Brightness middle	485	419 -14%	451 -7%	658 36%	328 -32%	378 -22%	509 5%
Brightness	481	431 -10%	443 -8%	633 32%	334 -31%	380 -21%	511 6%
Brightness Distribution	90	84 -7%	93 3%	93 3%	88 -2%	91 1%	93 3%
Black Level *	0.5		0.4 20%	0.66 -32%
Contrast	970		1128 16%	997 3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.2	4.1 2%	5.4 -29%	4.9 -17%	4.6 -10%	1.95 54%	2.2 48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	7.9	12 -52%	9.9 -25%	9.1 -15%	14.7 -86%	3.09 61%	5.8 27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.8	3.3 31%	6.7 -40%	5.8 -21%	2.8 42%	1.86 61%	2 58%
Gamma	2.36 ^102%	2.1 ^114%	2.33 ^103%	2.26 ^106%	2.29 ^105%	2.13 ^113%	2.25 ^107%
CCT	7568 ^86%	6550 ^99%	8262 ^79%	7840 ^83%	6612 ^98%	6376 ^102%	6768 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		89.38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		100

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

ℹ

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.

↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.4 ms Incremento
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26 ms).
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms Incremento
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	64601 Points ∼28%
ZTE Axon 7	122524 Points ∼53% +90%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	41676 Points ∼18% -35%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	62484 Points ∼27% -3%
Honor 8	94671 Points ∼41% +47%
OnePlus 3	142090 Points ∼62% +120%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	61345 Points ∼27% -5%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	3156 Points ∼11%
ZTE Axon 7	3867 Points ∼14% +23%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4042 Points ∼15% +28%
Honor 8	5481 Points ∼20% +74%
OnePlus 3	4097 Points ∼15% +30%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	2525 Points ∼9% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	845 Points ∼15%
ZTE Axon 7	1280 Points ∼22% +51%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	820 Points ∼14% -3%
Honor 8	1726 Points ∼30% +104%
OnePlus 3	1754 Points ∼30% +108%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	795 Points ∼14% -6%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	1795 Points ∼49%
ZTE Axon 7	1099 Points ∼30% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	1479 Points ∼41% -18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2112 Points ∼58% +18%
Honor 8	2587 Points ∼71% +44%
OnePlus 3	1789 Points ∼49% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	1631 Points ∼45% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	733 Points ∼9%
ZTE Axon 7	4619 Points ∼56% +530%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	275 Points ∼3% -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	719 Points ∼9% -2%
Honor 8	1112 Points ∼13% +52%
OnePlus 3	4633 Points ∼56% +532%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	725 Points ∼9% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	844 Points ∼13%
ZTE Axon 7	2698 Points ∼42% +220%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	336 Points ∼5% -60%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	842 Points ∼13% 0%
Honor 8	1273 Points ∼20% +51%
OnePlus 3	3424 Points ∼54% +306%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	827 Points ∼13% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	15823 Points ∼20%
ZTE Axon 7	20408 Points ∼26% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	9495 Points ∼12% -40%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	15984 Points ∼20% +1%
Honor 8	15531 Points ∼20% -2%
OnePlus 3	21771 Points ∼28% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	15923 Points ∼20% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	13412 Points ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7	24310 Points ∼5% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7542 Points ∼2% -44%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13466 Points ∼3% 0%
Honor 8	22157 Points ∼5% +65%
OnePlus 3	34023 Points ∼7% +154%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	13437 Points ∼3% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	13882 Points ∼7%
ZTE Axon 7	23319 Points ∼11% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7903 Points ∼4% -43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13955 Points ∼7% +1%
Honor 8	20235 Points ∼10% +46%
OnePlus 3	30241 Points ∼14% +118%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	13920 Points ∼7% 0%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	23 fps ∼1%
ZTE Axon 7	88 fps ∼5% +283%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps ∼1% -39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	23 fps ∼1% 0%
Honor 8	41 fps ∼2% +78%
OnePlus 3	89 fps ∼5% +287%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	23 fps ∼1% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	23 fps ∼5%
ZTE Axon 7	53 fps ∼12% +130%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps ∼3% -39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	21 fps ∼5% -9%
Honor 8	43 fps ∼9% +87%
OnePlus 3	60 fps ∼13% +161%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	23 fps ∼5% 0%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	9.9 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7	39 fps ∼7% +294%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps ∼1% -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Honor 8	19 fps ∼3% +92%
OnePlus 3	47 fps ∼9% +375%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	10 fps ∼2% +1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	10 fps ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7	28 fps ∼8% +180%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps ∼1% -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.7 fps ∼3% -3%
Honor 8	19 fps ∼5% +90%
OnePlus 3	46 fps ∼13% +360%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	10 fps ∼3% 0%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	6.2 fps ∼1%
ZTE Axon 7	31 fps ∼6% +400%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Honor 8	10 fps ∼2% +61%
OnePlus 3	31 fps ∼6% +400%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	6.2 fps ∼1% 0%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	6.6 fps ∼4%
ZTE Axon 7	16 fps ∼9% +142%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6.1 fps ∼3% -8%
Honor 8	11 fps ∼6% +67%
OnePlus 3	30 fps ∼17% +355%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	6.7 fps ∼4% +2%

GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	3.7 fps ∼1%
ZTE Axon 7	18 fps ∼5% +386%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	3.4 fps ∼1% -8%
Honor 8	6.3 fps ∼2% +70%
OnePlus 3	18 fps ∼5% +386%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	3.4 fps ∼1% -8%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	3.4 fps ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7	9.8 fps ∼8% +188%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	3.4 fps ∼3% 0%
Honor 8	6.9 fps ∼6% +103%
OnePlus 3	18 fps ∼15% +429%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	3.7 fps ∼3% +9%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	5724 Points ∼56%
ZTE Axon 7	4970 Points ∼48% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	4008 Points ∼39% -30%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6785 Points ∼66% +19%
Honor 8	6735 Points ∼66% +18%
OnePlus 3	7101 Points ∼69% +24%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	6767 Points ∼66% +18%

BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	754 Points ∼44%
ZTE Axon 7	963 Points ∼57% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	741 Points ∼44% -2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	702 Points ∼41% -7%
Honor 8	994 Points ∼59% +32%
OnePlus 3	1112 Points ∼66% +47%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	649 Points ∼38% -14%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	1015 Points ∼11%
ZTE Axon 7	4631 Points ∼50% +356%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	488 Points ∼5% -52%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1019 Points ∼11% 0%
Honor 8	1703 Points ∼18% +68%
OnePlus 3	4813 Points ∼52% +374%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	1013 Points ∼11% 0%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	1553 Points ∼35%
ZTE Axon 7	1489 Points ∼34% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	554 Points ∼13% -64%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1042 Points ∼24% -33%
Honor 8	2556 Points ∼58% +65%
OnePlus 3	2052 Points ∼46% +32%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	795 Points ∼18% -49%
System (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	2132 Points ∼21%
ZTE Axon 7	3307 Points ∼32% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	2153 Points ∼21% +1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2923 Points ∼28% +37%
Honor 8	3952 Points ∼38% +85%
OnePlus 3	3537 Points ∼34% +66%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	2069 Points ∼20% -3%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus	1262 Points ∼29%
ZTE Axon 7	2165 Points ∼50% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	810 Points ∼19% -36%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1215 Points ∼28% -4%
Honor 8	2034 Points ∼47% +61%
OnePlus 3	2496 Points ∼58% +98%
Lenovo Moto Z Play	1019 Points ∼24% -19%

Legenda

Huawei Nova Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

WebXPRT 2015 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	83 Points ∼10%
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	111 Points ∼14% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	64 Points ∼8% -23%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	84 Points ∼10% +1%
Honor 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	138 Points ∼17% +66%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	122 Points ∼15% +47%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	83 Points ∼10% 0%

Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4730 Points ∼10%
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8062 Points ∼16% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3611 Points ∼7% -24%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4905 Points ∼10% +4%
Honor 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10692 Points ∼22% +126%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	9155 Points ∼18% +94%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4979 Points ∼10% +5%

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	31.3 Points ∼9%
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.754 Points ∼13% +43%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22 Points ∼7% -30%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31.118 Points ∼9% -1%
Honor 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	64.046 Points ∼19% +105%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	54.4 Points ∼16% +74%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	31.8 Points ∼10% +2%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8027.7 ms * ∼13%
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3096.5 ms * ∼5% +61%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11887 ms * ∼20% -48%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8041.4 ms * ∼14% -0%
Honor 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2979 ms * ∼5% +63%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2920.7 ms * ∼5% +64%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8168.9 ms * ∼14% -2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

	Huawei Nova Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Honor 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5		81%	-35%	53%	8%	101%	31%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	33.32	51.34 54%		50.07 50%	23.59 -29%		50.57 52%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	41.64	78.39 88%		79.22 90%	53.68 29%		74.58 79%
Random Write 4KB	30.12	16.22 -46%	11.2 -63%	7.4 -75%	31.5 5%	18.23 -39%	45.58 51%
Random Read 4KB	35.64	121.07 240%	22.9 -36%	74 108%	34.16 -4%	137.62 286%	38.78 9%
Sequential Write 256KB	82.13	150.92 84%	60.4 -26%	188 129%	119.25 45%	153.3 87%	73.14 -11%
Sequential Read 256KB	241.57	406.49 68%	209.4 -13%	282 17%	247.46 2%	408.71 69%	254.78 5%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settaggi	Valore
	high	28 fps
	very low	29 fps

... in confronto

Carico massimo

Idle


34.9 °C	34.9 °C	36.6 °C
34.5 °C	35.3 °C	39.2 °C
33.5 °C	34.2 °C	39 °C

Massima: 39.2 °C
Media: 35.8 °C


31.4 °C	32.3 °C	33.2 °C
32.2 °C	32.8 °C	33.2 °C
31.5 °C	32.7 °C	32.9 °C

Massima: 33.2 °C
Media: 32.5 °C

Alimentazione (max) 30.4 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

The maximum temp on the upper side is 39.2 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Smartphone.

Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.39 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente

Off / Standby	0.03 / 0.11 Watt
Idle	0.49 / 1.63 / 1.76 Watt
Sotto carico	2.98 / 4.99 Watt


Leggenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Honor 8 3000 mAh	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh
Power Consumption		-36%	-35%	-28%	-29%	-19%
Idle Minimum *	0.49	0.57 -16%	0.78 -59%	0.83 -69%	0.64 -31%	0.96 -96%
Idle Average *	1.63	1.24 24%	1.89 -16%	2.11 -29%	0.84 48%	1.64 -1%
Idle Maximum *	1.76	1.36 23%	2.02 -15%	2.12 -20%	0.87 51%	1.71 3%
Load Average *	2.98	5.92 -99%	5.28 -77%	3.41 -14%	6.02 -102%	2.98 -0%
Load Maximum *	4.99	10.53 -111%	5.44 -9%	5.46 -9%	10.45 -109%	5.08 -2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria

Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)		34ore 08minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		13ore 40minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12ore 12minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)		6ore 06minuti

	Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Honor 8 3000 mAh	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh
Autonomia della batteria		-11%	-31%	-3%	-26%	3%	41%
Reader / Idle	2048	1338 -35%	1487 -27%	1502 -27%	1735 -15%	2323 13%	2540 24%
H.264	732	847 16%	526 -28%	905 24%	704 -4%	672 -8%	1190 63%
WiFi v1.3	820	840 2%	499 -39%	797 -3%	411 -50%	626 -24%	824 0%
Load	366	268 -27%	255 -30%	352 -4%	245 -33%	483 32%	652 78%

Pro

+ elevata qualità di costruzione

+ USB Type-C

+ buon display

+ lettore impronte digitali affidabile

+ buone fotocamere

+ ampia autonomia

Contro

- elevati valori SAR

- WLAN solo 2.4 GHz

- manca App2SD / la microSD non può essere formattata come spazio interno

- solo dual-SIM ibrida

In review: Huawei Nova Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.

Lo Huawei Nova Plus è uno smartphone molto buono e ci sono davvero poche pecche. Oltre al luminoso display avrete due fotocamere molto buone. I fanatici dei sefies godranno della fotocamera frontale in particolare. Avrete anche una potente batteria, che attualmente mantiene le promesse e regge per più di un giorno.

Dovrete accettare qualche piccolo compromesso in termini di qualità di costruzione, sebbene sia una critica molto elevata. Sfortunatamente le apps non possono essere archiviate sulla microSD-card ed anche lo slot è relativamente lento. Il Wi-Fi 5.0 GHz dovrebbe essere scontato in questa fascia di prezzo.

Lo Huawei Nova Plus offre un potente pacchetto con buone fotocamere e ampia autonomia.

Possiamo raccomandare il Nova Plus, in quanto è un pacchetto conveniente. Tuttavia, non disdegnate uno sguardo ai concorrenti in questa fascia di prezzo.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Huawei Nova Plus - 2016-12-0212/02/2016 v5.1
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

86%

Tastiera

69 / 75 → 92%

Dispositivo di puntamento

96%

Connettività

42 / 60 → 70%

Peso

91%

Batteria

95%

Display

86%

Prestazioni di gioco

33 / 63 → 52%

Prestazioni Applicazioni

50 / 70 → 72%

Temperatura

89%

Rumorosità

100%

Audio

60 / 91 → 66%

Fotocamera

75%

Media

75%

86%

Smartphone - Media ponderata

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei Nova Plus

Size Comparison

Tempi di risposta del Display

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis

Honor 8 audio analysis

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

Pro

Contro

Pricecompare