Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei Nova Plus

Daniel Schmidt (traduzione a cura di G.DeLuca), 12/12/2016

Finalmente registrazione 4k! Lo Huawei Nova Plus lascia un'impressione premium nel segmento mainstream ed è il primo smartphone del produttore Cinese con registrazione video Ultra-HD. Tuttavia, Huawei non utilizza il proprio SoC Kirin, ma un chip Qualcomm. Come si comporta questo smartphone nel competitivo segmento fino a 400 Euro (~$432)?

Huawei Nova Plus (Nova Serie)
Scheda grafica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memoria
3072 MB 
, LPDDR3
Schermo
5.5 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, Multitouch, 10 Punkte, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24.01 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: kombinierte Kopfhörer- und Mikrofonklinke (3,5 mm), Lettore schede: MicroSD bis zu 128 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Hall Sensor, Fingerprint Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Digital Compass, Gravity Sensor, OTG, Wifi Direct
Rete
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800 und 1.900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (900 und 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat. 7 (Band 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 und 38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.3 x 151.8 x 75.7
Batteria
14.7 Wh, 3340 mAh polimeri di litio, 4.4 V, Tempo conversazione 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 25 ore, Standby 2G (dichiarata dal produttore): 427 ore, Standby 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 448 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 16 MPix (Autofokus, OIS, zweifarbiger LED-Blitz, UHD-Video)
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix (Fixfokus)
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Monolautsprecher, Tastiera: virtuell, Netzteil, USB-Kabel, SIM-Tool, Headset, EMUI 4.1, 24 Mesi Garanzia, USB Type-C, Körper-SAR: 1.42 W/kg, Kopf-SAR: 1.41 W/kg, senza ventola
Peso
162 gr, Alimentazione: 67 gr
Prezzo
429 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s ∼100% +531%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s ∼95% +499%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼36% +127%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.4 MBit/s ∼16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s ∼10% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s ∼100% +527%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
298 MBit/s ∼92% +479%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼35% +117%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.5 MBit/s ∼16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s ∼10% -39%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
488
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 504 cd/m² Media: 480.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.51 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 90 %
Al centro con la batteria: 485 cd/m²
Contrasto: 970:1 (Nero: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.36
Huawei Nova Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-8%
-9%
-1%
-20%
22%
25%
Brightness middle
485
419
-14%
451
-7%
658
36%
328
-32%
378
-22%
509
5%
Brightness
481
431
-10%
443
-8%
633
32%
334
-31%
380
-21%
511
6%
Brightness Distribution
90
84
-7%
93
3%
93
3%
88
-2%
91
1%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.5
0.4
20%
0.66
-32%
Contrast
970
1128
16%
997
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.2
4.1
2%
5.4
-29%
4.9
-17%
4.6
-10%
1.95
54%
2.2
48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.9
12
-52%
9.9
-25%
9.1
-15%
14.7
-86%
3.09
61%
5.8
27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
3.3
31%
6.7
-40%
5.8
-21%
2.8
42%
1.86
61%
2
58%
Gamma
2.36 102%
2.1 114%
2.33 103%
2.26 106%
2.29 105%
2.13 113%
2.25 107%
CCT
7568 86%
6550 99%
8262 79%
7840 83%
6612 98%
6376 102%
6768 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms Incremento
↘ 19.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms Incremento
↘ 18 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
64601 Points ∼28%
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼54% +90%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points ∼18% -35%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points ∼27% -3%
Honor 8
94671 Points ∼42% +47%
OnePlus 3
142090 Points ∼62% +120%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points ∼27% -5%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
3156 Points ∼11%
ZTE Axon 7
3867 Points ∼14% +23%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points ∼15% +28%
Honor 8
5481 Points ∼20% +74%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points ∼15% +30%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2525 Points ∼9% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
845 Points ∼15%
ZTE Axon 7
1280 Points ∼22% +51%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points ∼14% -3%
Honor 8
1726 Points ∼30% +104%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points ∼30% +108%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼14% -6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
1795 Points ∼58%
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼36% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points ∼48% -18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼68% +18%
Honor 8
2587 Points ∼84% +44%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼58% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points ∼53% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
733 Points ∼9%
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼60% +530%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points ∼4% -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9% -2%
Honor 8
1112 Points ∼14% +52%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼60% +532%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points ∼9% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
844 Points ∼17%
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼54% +220%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points ∼7% -60%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼17% 0%
Honor 8
1273 Points ∼25% +51%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼68% +306%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points ∼16% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
15823 Points ∼20%
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼26% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points ∼12% -40%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼20% +1%
Honor 8
15531 Points ∼20% -2%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼28% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points ∼20% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
13412 Points ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼5% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points ∼2% -44%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3% 0%
Honor 8
22157 Points ∼5% +65%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼7% +154%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points ∼3% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
13882 Points ∼7%
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼11% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points ∼4% -43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7% +1%
Honor 8
20235 Points ∼10% +46%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼14% +118%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points ∼7% 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps ∼6% +283%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼1% -39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼2% 0%
Honor 8
41 fps ∼3% +78%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼7% +287%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼2% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼5%
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps ∼12% +130%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼3% -39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼5% -9%
Honor 8
43 fps ∼9% +87%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼13% +161%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼5% 0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
9.9 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps ∼7% +294%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼3% +92%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼9% +375%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼2% +1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
10 fps ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps ∼8% +180%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼3% -3%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼5% +90%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼13% +360%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼3% 0%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
6.2 fps ∼1%
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps ∼7% +400%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Honor 8
10 fps ∼2% +61%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼7% +400%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps ∼1% 0%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
6.6 fps ∼4%
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps ∼9% +142%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼3% -8%
Honor 8
11 fps ∼6% +67%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼17% +355%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps ∼4% +2%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
3.7 fps ∼1%
ZTE Axon 7
18 fps ∼5% +386%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼1% -8%
Honor 8
6.3 fps ∼2% +70%
OnePlus 3
18 fps ∼5% +386%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.4 fps ∼1% -8%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
3.4 fps ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7
9.8 fps ∼8% +188%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼3% 0%
Honor 8
6.9 fps ∼6% +103%
OnePlus 3
18 fps ∼15% +429%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.7 fps ∼3% +9%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
5724 Points ∼67%
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼58% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points ∼47% -30%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼79% +19%
Honor 8
6735 Points ∼79% +18%
OnePlus 3
7101 Points ∼83% +24%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points ∼79% +18%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
754 Points ∼44%
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼57% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points ∼44% -2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼41% -7%
Honor 8
994 Points ∼59% +32%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼66% +47%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points ∼38% -14%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
1015 Points ∼11%
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼50% +356%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points ∼5% -52%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼11% 0%
Honor 8
1703 Points ∼18% +68%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼52% +374%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points ∼11% 0%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
1553 Points ∼35%
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼34% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points ∼13% -64%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼24% -33%
Honor 8
2556 Points ∼58% +65%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼46% +32%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼18% -49%
System (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
2132 Points ∼21%
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼32% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points ∼21% +1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼28% +37%
Honor 8
3952 Points ∼38% +85%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼34% +66%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points ∼20% -3%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
1262 Points ∼33%
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼57% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points ∼21% -36%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼32% -4%
Honor 8
2034 Points ∼54% +61%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼66% +98%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points ∼27% -19%

Legenda

 
Huawei Nova Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
83 Points ∼10%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 Points ∼14% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
64 Points ∼8% -23%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
84 Points ∼10% +1%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
138 Points ∼17% +66%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
122 Points ∼15% +47%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
83 Points ∼10% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4730 Points ∼10%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8062 Points ∼16% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3611 Points ∼7% -24%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4905 Points ∼10% +4%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10692 Points ∼22% +126%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
9155 Points ∼18% +94%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4979 Points ∼10% +5%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.3 Points ∼9%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.754 Points ∼13% +43%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22 Points ∼7% -30%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.118 Points ∼9% -1%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
64.046 Points ∼19% +105%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
54.4 Points ∼16% +74%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.8 Points ∼10% +2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8027.7 ms * ∼13%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3096.5 ms * ∼5% +61%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11887 ms * ∼20% -48%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8041.4 ms * ∼14% -0%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2979 ms * ∼5% +63%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2920.7 ms * ∼5% +64%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8168.9 ms * ∼14% -2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
81%
-35%
53%
8%
101%
31%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
33.32
51.34
54%
50.07
50%
23.59
-29%
50.57
52%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
41.64
78.39
88%
79.22
90%
53.68
29%
74.58
79%
Random Write 4KB
30.12
16.22
-46%
11.2
-63%
7.4
-75%
31.5
5%
18.23
-39%
45.58
51%
Random Read 4KB
35.64
121.07
240%
22.9
-36%
74
108%
34.16
-4%
137.62
286%
38.78
9%
Sequential Write 256KB
82.13
150.92
84%
60.4
-26%
188
129%
119.25
45%
153.3
87%
73.14
-11%
Sequential Read 256KB
241.57
406.49
68%
209.4
-13%
282
17%
247.46
2%
408.71
69%
254.78
5%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high28 fps
 very low29 fps
Carico massimo
 34.9 °C34.9 °C36.6 °C 
 34.5 °C35.3 °C39.2 °C 
 33.5 °C34.2 °C39 °C 
Massima: 39.2 °C
Media: 35.8 °C
31.4 °C32.3 °C33.2 °C
32.2 °C32.8 °C33.2 °C
31.5 °C32.7 °C32.9 °C
Massima: 33.2 °C
Media: 32.5 °C
Alimentazione (max)  30.4 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6422525.437.63125.331.44032.936.35033.651.76331.634.38028.431.71002736.912520.8261602229.920021.341.825020.853.931521.259.440019.463.650019.567.463017.766.180017.970.1100017.869.8125017.373.4160017.474.6200016.776.7250017.277.2315018.278.9400017.979.6500017.676630017.772.9800017.873.21000017.971.11250018.164.51600018.257.2SPL3087.4N1.368.4median 17.9Huawei Nova Plusmedian 69.8Delta1.310.231.632.825.430.425.332.132.933.333.63631.630.128.427.82725.420.825.62229.121.339.620.848.321.254.219.456.819.559.117.758.117.961.117.864.417.365.817.467.416.770.317.27118.277.117.979.117.673.517.772.117.87117.966.418.157.518.253.13084.71.353.4median 17.9Honor 8median 61.11.310.740.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 70.3OnePlus 3median 53.8median 17.7median 70.311.910.41.611.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.39 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.11 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.49 / 1.63 / 1.76 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 2.98 / 4.99 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Power Consumption
-36%
-35%
-28%
-29%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
0.49
0.57
-16%
0.78
-59%
0.83
-69%
0.64
-31%
0.96
-96%
Idle Average *
1.63
1.24
24%
1.89
-16%
2.11
-29%
0.84
48%
1.64
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.76
1.36
23%
2.02
-15%
2.12
-20%
0.87
51%
1.71
3%
Load Average *
2.98
5.92
-99%
5.28
-77%
3.41
-14%
6.02
-102%
2.98
-0%
Load Maximum *
4.99
10.53
-111%
5.44
-9%
5.46
-9%
10.45
-109%
5.08
-2%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
34ore 08minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13ore 40minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12ore 12minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
6ore 06minuti
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
-11%
-31%
-3%
-26%
3%
41%
Reader / Idle
2048
1338
-35%
1487
-27%
1502
-27%
1735
-15%
2323
13%
2540
24%
H.264
732
847
16%
526
-28%
905
24%
704
-4%
672
-8%
1190
63%
WiFi v1.3
820
840
2%
499
-39%
797
-3%
411
-50%
626
-24%
824
0%
Load
366
268
-27%
255
-30%
352
-4%
245
-33%
483
32%
652
78%

Pro

+ elevata qualità di costruzione
+ USB Type-C
+ buon display
+ lettore impronte digitali affidabile
+ buone fotocamere
+ ampia autonomia

Contro

- elevati valori SAR
- WLAN solo 2.4 GHz
- manca App2SD / la microSD non può essere formattata come spazio interno
- solo dual-SIM ibrida
In review: Huawei Nova Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei Nova Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.

Lo Huawei Nova Plus è uno smartphone molto buono e ci sono davvero poche pecche. Oltre al luminoso display avrete due fotocamere molto buone. I fanatici dei sefies godranno della fotocamera frontale in particolare. Avrete anche una potente batteria, che attualmente mantiene le promesse e regge per più di un giorno.

Dovrete accettare qualche piccolo compromesso in termini di qualità di costruzione, sebbene sia una critica molto elevata. Sfortunatamente le apps non possono essere archiviate sulla microSD-card ed anche lo slot è relativamente lento. Il Wi-Fi 5.0 GHz dovrebbe essere scontato in questa fascia di prezzo.

Lo Huawei Nova Plus offre un potente pacchetto con buone fotocamere e ampia autonomia.

Possiamo raccomandare il Nova Plus, in quanto è un pacchetto conveniente. Tuttavia, non disdegnate uno sguardo ai concorrenti in questa fascia di prezzo.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Huawei Nova Plus - 12/02/2016 v5.1
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86%
Tastiera
69 / 75 → 92%
Dispositivo di puntamento
96%
Connettività
42 / 60 → 70%
Peso
91%
Batteria
95%
Display
86%
Prestazioni di gioco
33 / 63 → 52%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
50 / 70 → 72%
Temperatura
89%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Fotocamera
75%
Media
75%
86%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei Nova Plus
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-12-12 (Update: 2016-12-13)