Recensione breve dello Smartphone Huawei Nova Plus
Finalmente registrazione 4k! Lo Huawei Nova Plus lascia un'impressione premium nel segmento mainstream ed è il primo smartphone del produttore Cinese con registrazione video Ultra-HD. Tuttavia, Huawei non utilizza il proprio SoC Kirin, ma un chip Qualcomm. Come si comporta questo smartphone nel competitivo segmento fino a 400 Euro (~$432)?
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix (Fixfokus)
Size Comparison
I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL |
|
Distribuzione della luminosità: 90 %
Al centro con la batteria: 485 cd/m²
Contrasto: 970:1 (Nero: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.36
Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5 | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5 | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2 | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5 | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2 | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -8% | -9% | -1% | -20% | 22% | 25% | |
Brightness middle | 485 | 419 -14% | 451 -7% | 658 36% | 328 -32% | 378 -22% | 509 5% |
Brightness | 481 | 431 -10% | 443 -8% | 633 32% | 334 -31% | 380 -21% | 511 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 84 -7% | 93 3% | 93 3% | 88 -2% | 91 1% | 93 3% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.4 20% | 0.66 -32% | ||||
Contrast | 970 | 1128 16% | 997 3% | ||||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.2 | 4.1 2% | 5.4 -29% | 4.9 -17% | 4.6 -10% | 1.95 54% | 2.2 48% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 7.9 | 12 -52% | 9.9 -25% | 9.1 -15% | 14.7 -86% | 3.09 61% | 5.8 27% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.8 | 3.3 31% | 6.7 -40% | 5.8 -21% | 2.8 42% | 1.86 61% | 2 58% |
Gamma | 2.36 102% | 2.1 114% | 2.33 103% | 2.26 106% | 2.29 105% | 2.13 113% | 2.25 107% |
CCT | 7568 86% | 6550 99% | 8262 79% | 7840 83% | 6612 98% | 6376 102% | 6768 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | ||||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Tempi di risposta del Display
↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco | ||
---|---|---|
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms Incremento | |
↘ 19.6 ms Calo | ||
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms). | ||
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio | ||
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms Incremento | |
↘ 18 ms Calo | ||
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
GFXBench 4.0 | |
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (ordina per valore) | |
Huawei Nova Plus | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Lenovo Moto Z Play |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Huawei Nova Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash | ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Honor 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 81% | -35% | 53% | 8% | 101% | 31% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 33.32 | 51.34 54% | 50.07 50% | 23.59 -29% | 50.57 52% | ||
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 41.64 | 78.39 88% | 79.22 90% | 53.68 29% | 74.58 79% | ||
Random Write 4KB | 30.12 | 16.22 -46% | 11.2 -63% | 7.4 -75% | 31.5 5% | 18.23 -39% | 45.58 51% |
Random Read 4KB | 35.64 | 121.07 240% | 22.9 -36% | 74 108% | 34.16 -4% | 137.62 286% | 38.78 9% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 82.13 | 150.92 84% | 60.4 -26% | 188 129% | 119.25 45% | 153.3 87% | 73.14 -11% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 241.57 | 406.49 68% | 209.4 -13% | 282 17% | 247.46 2% | 408.71 69% | 254.78 5% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settaggi | Valore | ||
high | 28 fps | ||
very low | 29 fps |
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.39 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Honor 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
OnePlus 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sotto carico |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Leggenda:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -36% | -35% | -28% | -29% | -19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.49 | 0.57 -16% | 0.78 -59% | 0.83 -69% | 0.64 -31% | 0.96 -96% |
Idle Average * | 1.63 | 1.24 24% | 1.89 -16% | 2.11 -29% | 0.84 48% | 1.64 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.76 | 1.36 23% | 2.02 -15% | 2.12 -20% | 0.87 51% | 1.71 3% |
Load Average * | 2.98 | 5.92 -99% | 5.28 -77% | 3.41 -14% | 6.02 -102% | 2.98 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 4.99 | 10.53 -111% | 5.44 -9% | 5.46 -9% | 10.45 -109% | 5.08 -2% |
* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli
Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autonomia della batteria | -11% | -31% | -3% | -26% | 3% | 41% | |
Reader / Idle | 2048 | 1338 -35% | 1487 -27% | 1502 -27% | 1735 -15% | 2323 13% | 2540 24% |
H.264 | 732 | 847 16% | 526 -28% | 905 24% | 704 -4% | 672 -8% | 1190 63% |
WiFi v1.3 | 820 | 840 2% | 499 -39% | 797 -3% | 411 -50% | 626 -24% | 824 0% |
Load | 366 | 268 -27% | 255 -30% | 352 -4% | 245 -33% | 483 32% | 652 78% |
Pro
Contro
Lo Huawei Nova Plus è uno smartphone molto buono e ci sono davvero poche pecche. Oltre al luminoso display avrete due fotocamere molto buone. I fanatici dei sefies godranno della fotocamera frontale in particolare. Avrete anche una potente batteria, che attualmente mantiene le promesse e regge per più di un giorno.
Dovrete accettare qualche piccolo compromesso in termini di qualità di costruzione, sebbene sia una critica molto elevata. Sfortunatamente le apps non possono essere archiviate sulla microSD-card ed anche lo slot è relativamente lento. Il Wi-Fi 5.0 GHz dovrebbe essere scontato in questa fascia di prezzo.
Lo Huawei Nova Plus offre un potente pacchetto con buone fotocamere e ampia autonomia.
Possiamo raccomandare il Nova Plus, in quanto è un pacchetto conveniente. Tuttavia, non disdegnate uno sguardo ai concorrenti in questa fascia di prezzo.
Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.
Huawei Nova Plus - 12/02/2016 v5.1
Daniel Schmidt