Notebookcheck

Recensione dello smartphone Oukitel C15 Pro: un dispositivo debole ed economico con un display luminoso

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 06/22/2019

L'essenziale Questo Oukitel C15 Pro sotto i 100€ (~$112) ha sorpreso con il suo luminoso display IPS. Continuate a leggere per scoprire se questo smartphone economico ha molto di più da offrire rispetto al suo schermo.

Oukitel C15 Pro (C Serie)
Processore
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
Scheda grafica
PowerVR GE8300
Memoria
2048 MB 
Schermo
6.09 pollici 19.2:9, 1280 x 600 pixel 232 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS LCD, lucido: si
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.6 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: jack cuffie da 3.5 mm, Lettore schede: Schede microSD fino a 128 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Accelerometro, sensore di prossimità, OTG, FM radio
Rete
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G/GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz; B5, B8, B3, B2. 3G/WCDMA: 900, 2,100 MHz; B1, B8. 4G/FDD-LTE: 800, 900, 1,800, 2,100, 2,600 MHz; B1, B3, B7, B8, B20., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.9 x 155.6 x 73.3
Batteria
3200 mAh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 8 MPix + 2 MPix, Camera2 API: Limited
Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Cassa Mono, Tastiera: Onscreen, Pellicola protettiva, caricabatterie, cavo microUSB, custodia in silicone, guida rapida all'uso, Oukitel UI, 12 Mesi Garanzia, LTE Cat. 4 (150 Mbps/51 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L3., senza ventola
Peso
174 gr, Alimentazione: 51 gr
Prezzo
90 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Oukitel C15 Pro
Oukitel C15 Pro

Confronto dimensioni

155.6 mm 73.3 mm 8.9 mm 174 g156.28 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g155.5 mm 76 mm 8.3 mm 177 g153.8 mm 76 mm 9.8 mm 180 g153.6 mm 77.6 mm 9.7 mm 174 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 8.3 mm 145 g146.5 mm 70.9 mm 8.3 mm 145 g140.4 mm 70.1 mm 8.35 mm 137 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=409)
222 MBit/s ∼100% +192%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
91.2 (min: 44, max: 108) MBit/s ∼41% +20%
Oukitel C13 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
84 (min: 7, max: 105) MBit/s ∼38% +11%
Oukitel C15 Pro
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
76 (min: 52, max: 101) MBit/s ∼34%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
69 (min: 61, max: 66) MBit/s ∼31% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼27% -22%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (min: 48, max: 55) MBit/s ∼25% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 (min: 46, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼22% -36%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=409)
212 MBit/s ∼100% +207%
Oukitel C13 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
94 (min: 34, max: 102) MBit/s ∼44% +36%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
85.6 (min: 42, max: 106) MBit/s ∼40% +24%
Oukitel C15 Pro
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
69 (min: 31, max: 77) MBit/s ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 48, max: 61) MBit/s ∼27% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼26% -19%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% -24%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.3 (min: 48, max: 55) MBit/s ∼25% -24%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37.8 (min: 29, max: 46) MBit/s ∼18% -45%
Foto Standard
Foto Standard
Modalità ritratto
Modalità ritratto
Modalità monocromatica
Modalità monocromatica
Impostazioni fotocamera
Impostazioni fotocamera
Impostazioni fotocamera
Impostazioni fotocamera
Viewfinder
Viewfinder
Modalità Pro
Modalità Pro

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
ColorChecker Passport: La metà inferiore di ogni area di colore mostra il colore di riferimento.
ColorChecker Passport: La metà inferiore di ogni area di colore mostra il colore di riferimento.
Immagine del nostro grafico di test
Immagine del nostro grafico di test a bassa luminosità
ColorChecker Passport: La metà inferiore di ogni area di colore mostra il colore di riferimento.
693
cd/m²
640
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
684
cd/m²
674
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
676
cd/m²
655
cd/m²
641
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 693 cd/m² Media: 653.7 cd/m² Minimum: 24.8 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 86 %
Al centro con la batteria: 674 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1204:1 (Nero: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
89.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Oukitel C15 Pro
IPS LCD, 1280x600, 6.09
Oukitel C13 Pro
IPS LCD, 996x480, 6.18
Oukitel U25 Pro
IPS LCD, 1920x1080, 5.5
TP-Link Neffos C9A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi Go
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Huawei Y6 2019
IPS LCD, 1560x720, 6.09
Screen
-43%
-24%
9%
-12%
-15%
3%
2%
Brightness middle
674
388
-42%
649
-4%
535
-21%
338
-50%
340
-50%
404
-40%
487
-28%
Brightness
654
402
-39%
623
-5%
528
-19%
327
-50%
309
-53%
400
-39%
485
-26%
Brightness Distribution
86
88
2%
90
5%
96
12%
82
-5%
77
-10%
82
-5%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.56
0.26
54%
0.56
-0%
0.42
25%
0.27
52%
0.28
50%
0.26
54%
0.35
37%
Contrast
1204
1492
24%
1159
-4%
1274
6%
1252
4%
1214
1%
1554
29%
1391
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.3
9.2
-74%
7.1
-34%
4.18
21%
5.36
-1%
5.53
-4%
4.28
19%
4.3
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.2
18.4
-124%
12.6
-54%
9.62
-17%
9.77
-19%
9.87
-20%
9.97
-22%
10.1
-23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
11.7
-144%
9.4
-96%
1.7
65%
6.2
-29%
6.4
-33%
3.5
27%
4.1
15%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.58 85%
2.1 105%
2.345 94%
2.275 97%
2.213 99%
2.09 105%
CCT
7475 87%
11121 58%
8629 75%
6502 100%
8460 77%
8198 79%
6899 94%
7312 89%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9429 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
24 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 6.8 ms Incremento
↘ 17.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 33 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25.1 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
51.2 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 15.6 ms Incremento
↘ 35.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 85 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (40.2 ms).
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5054 Points ∼56%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5377 Points ∼60% +6%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
3850 Points ∼43% -24%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3126 Points ∼35% -38%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼35% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3192 Points ∼35% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5511 Points ∼61% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +79%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (4195 - 5511, n=3)
4920 Points ∼54% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=357)
4997 Points ∼55% -1%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7216 Points ∼66%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3742 Points ∼34% -48%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5154 Points ∼47% -29%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
4050 Points ∼37% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6194 Points ∼56% -14%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4229 Points ∼38% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼100% +52%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (4229 - 7216, n=3)
5687 Points ∼52% -21%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=525)
5466 Points ∼50% -24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
954 Points ∼25%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
698 Points ∼18% -27%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
904 Points ∼24% -5%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
627 Points ∼17% -34%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼23% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
853 Points ∼23% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
807 Points ∼21% -15%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
889 Points ∼23% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100% +297%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (889 - 954, n=3)
922 Points ∼24% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=386)
1805 Points ∼48% +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
461 Points ∼4%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
189 Points ∼2% -59%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
496 Points ∼5% +8%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
169 Points ∼2% -63%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼2% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
248 Points ∼2% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
445 Points ∼4% -3%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
450 Points ∼4% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +2132%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (450 - 461, n=3)
454 Points ∼4% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=386)
2194 Points ∼21% +376%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
521 Points ∼7%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
225 Points ∼3% -57%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
551 Points ∼7% +6%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
202 Points ∼3% -61%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼4% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
294 Points ∼4% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
494 Points ∼7% -5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
505 Points ∼7% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +1330%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (505 - 521, n=3)
512 Points ∼7% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=387)
1860 Points ∼25% +257%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
923 Points ∼26%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
690 Points ∼19% -25%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1006 Points ∼28% +9%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
641 Points ∼18% -31%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼25% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
878 Points ∼24% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
840 Points ∼23% -9%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
869 Points ∼24% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100% +292%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (869 - 923, n=3)
901 Points ∼25% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=480)
1667 Points ∼46% +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
434 Points ∼4%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
185 Points ∼2% -57%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
109 Points ∼1% -75%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
145 Points ∼1% -67%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼0% -89%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
43 Points ∼0% -90%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
403 Points ∼4% -7%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
357 Points ∼4% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +2196%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (357 - 434, n=3)
384 Points ∼4% -12%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=480)
1801 Points ∼18% +315%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
492 Points ∼7%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
211 Points ∼3% -57%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
136 Points ∼2% -72%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
175 Points ∼2% -64%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼1% -88%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
55 Points ∼1% -89%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
456 Points ∼6% -7%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
411 Points ∼6% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +1357%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (411 - 492, n=3)
440 Points ∼6% -11%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=488)
1541 Points ∼22% +213%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
15348 Points ∼61%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10981 Points ∼43% -28%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9979 Points ∼39% -35%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
9513 Points ∼38% -38%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼41% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10188 Points ∼40% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14128 Points ∼56% -8%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14037 Points ∼55% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼100% +65%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (14037 - 15348, n=3)
14796 Points ∼58% -4%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=640)
13636 Points ∼54% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7695 Points ∼7%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3700 Points ∼3% -52%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
8856 Points ∼8% +15%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3588 Points ∼3% -53%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼5% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5391 Points ∼5% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6785 Points ∼6% -12%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7567 Points ∼7% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +1284%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (7514 - 7695, n=3)
7592 Points ∼7% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (11427 - 162695, n=640)
19988 Points ∼19% +160%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8657 Points ∼14%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4339 Points ∼7% -50%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9085 Points ∼15% +5%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4164 Points ∼7% -52%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼10% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6021 Points ∼10% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7671 Points ∼12% -11%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8431 Points ∼14% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼100% +619%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (8431 - 8657, n=3)
8513 Points ∼14% -2%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=641)
16573 Points ∼27% +91%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼8%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6.1 fps ∼4% -56%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼10% +14%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6 fps ∼4% -57%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼5% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼5% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13 fps ∼8% -7%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼8% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +1093%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (14 - 14, n=3)
14 fps ∼8% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=669)
35 fps ∼21% +150%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
22 fps ∼37%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
15 fps ∼25% -32%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼27% -27%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
9.9 fps ∼17% -55%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼23% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
13 fps ∼22% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼32% -14%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
20 fps ∼33% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +173%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (20 - 22, n=3)
21 fps ∼35% -5%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=672)
26.9 fps ∼45% +22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.6 fps ∼7%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.7 fps ∼3% -59%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.1 fps ∼7% +8%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.7 fps ∼3% -59%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼3% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.3 fps ∼6% -5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.5 fps ∼7% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +1415%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (6.5 - 6.6, n=3)
6.53 fps ∼7% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=588)
19.3 fps ∼19% +192%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
15 fps ∼25%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 fps ∼17% -33%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼13% -50%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5.4 fps ∼9% -64%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼10% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5.6 fps ∼9% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12 fps ∼20% -20%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
11 fps ∼18% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +300%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (11 - 15, n=3)
12.7 fps ∼21% -15%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=593)
17.8 fps ∼30% +19%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.5 fps ∼4%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.7 fps ∼2% -32%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps ∼7% +88%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.6 fps ∼2% -36%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼6% +60%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼6% +68%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +2660%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.5 - 4.3, n=3)
3.67 fps ∼5% +47%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=449)
15.9 fps ∼23% +536%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
11 fps ∼19%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6.7 fps ∼12% -39%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5 fps ∼9% -55%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3.4 fps ∼6% -69%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.5 fps ∼13% -32%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7.6 fps ∼13% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +427%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (7.6 - 11, n=3)
8.8 fps ∼15% -20%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=452)
15.2 fps ∼26% +38%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.7 fps ∼15%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2 fps ∼8% -46%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps ∼6% -59%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.64 fps ∼3% -83%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.7 fps ∼11% -27%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.7 fps ∼11% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +549%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.7 - 3.7, n=3)
3.07 fps ∼13% -17%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=152)
8.97 fps ∼37% +142%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼5%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.4 fps ∼3% -50%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
0.9 fps ∼6% +13%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
fps ∼0% -100%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0.85 fps ∼5% +6%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼5% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +1900%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (0.8 - 0.8, n=3)
0.8 fps ∼5% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=152)
6.2 fps ∼39% +675%
Normal Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5.8 fps ∼16%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.5 fps ∼7% -57%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.2 fps ∼6% -62%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.8 fps ∼5% -69%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼12% -26%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼6% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +538%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.3 - 5.8, n=3)
4.13 fps ∼11% -29%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=154)
13.5 fps ∼36% +133%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.4 fps ∼8%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.6 fps ∼1% -82%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.3 fps ∼6% -32%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.95 fps ∼2% -72%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.3 (min: 4.3) fps ∼6% -32%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼10% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +1106%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.3 - 4.2, n=3)
3.3 fps ∼8% -3%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=153)
14.8 fps ∼36% +335%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼5%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.6 fps ∼1% -70%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.5 fps ∼6% +25%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.88 fps ∼2% -56%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.9 fps ∼5% -5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼5% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +2000%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2 - 2, n=3)
2 fps ∼5% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=378)
10.7 fps ∼25% +435%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.1 fps ∼11%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.6 fps ∼7% -37%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼7% -32%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.5 fps ∼4% -63%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.2 fps ∼8% -22%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.1 fps ∼8% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +827%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (3.1 - 4.1, n=3)
3.47 fps ∼9% -15%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=382)
9.65 fps ∼25% +135%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.09 (min: 1.56, max: 7.87) fps ∼8%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% +1111%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (3.09 - 3.09, n=2)
1.545 fps ∼4% -50%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.53 - 651, n=62)
25.4 fps ∼68% +722%
Vulkan Medium Native (ordina per valore)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
 
0 fps ∼0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.91 - 606, n=57)
22.5 fps ∼70%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼100%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (0 - 0, n=2)
0 fps ∼0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3.2 - 739, n=57)
27 fps ∼76%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
64782 Points ∼17%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
46951 Points ∼13% -28%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
54871 Points ∼15% -15%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
36768 Points ∼10% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
61753 Points ∼16% -5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
64157 Points ∼17% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +479%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (63421 - 64782, n=3)
64120 Points ∼17% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=270)
130378 Points ∼35% +101%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
857 Points ∼62%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
624 Points ∼45% -27%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -99%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼47% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
733 Points ∼53% -14%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
785 Points ∼57% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼100% +61%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (775 - 857, n=3)
806 Points ∼58% -6%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=600)
741 Points ∼54% -14%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
475 Points ∼5%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
190 Points ∼2% -60%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
641 Points ∼7% +35%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
186 Points ∼2% -61%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼5% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
426 Points ∼5% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
482 Points ∼5% +1%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
470 Points ∼5% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +1852%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (470 - 475, n=3)
472 Points ∼5% -1%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=600)
1942 Points ∼21% +309%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
531 Points ∼13%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
818 Points ∼20% +54%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
983 Points ∼24% +85%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1039 Points ∼26% +96%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼12% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
363 Points ∼9% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
607 Points ∼15% +14%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1458 Points ∼36% +175%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +659%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (531 - 1458, n=3)
1137 Points ∼28% +114%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=600)
1446 Points ∼36% +172%
System (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1419 Points ∼17%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1338 Points ∼16% -6%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1931 Points ∼23% +36%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1425 Points ∼17% 0%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼15% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1210 Points ∼14% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1434 Points ∼17% +1%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1755 Points ∼21% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% +495%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (1419 - 1798, n=3)
1657 Points ∼20% +17%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=600)
2852 Points ∼34% +101%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
744 Points ∼16%
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
600 Points ∼13% -19%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
330 Points ∼7% -56%
TP-Link Neffos C9A
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
227 Points ∼5% -69%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼14% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
207 Points ∼5% -72%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
745 Points ∼16% 0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
986 Points ∼21% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼100% +518%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (744 - 986, n=3)
904 Points ∼20% +22%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=604)
1418 Points ∼31% +91%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C15 Pro
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
102 Points ∼7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
93 Points ∼7% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼100% +1287%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
 
102 Points ∼7% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
709 Points ∼50% +595%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼100% +270%
Media della classe Smartphone (14.6 - 108, n=79)
30.7 Points ∼54% +98%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (15.3 - 15.7, n=3)
15.5 Points ∼27% 0%
Oukitel C15 Pro (Chrome 74)
15.467 Points ∼27%
Huawei Y6 2019
15.326 Points ∼27% -1%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
10.876 Points ∼19% -30%
TP-Link Neffos C9A (Chrome 73)
10.39 Points ∼18% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 74)
Points ∼0% -100%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼100% +321%
Media della classe Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=71)
34.6 runs/min ∼53% +122%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
15.69 runs/min ∼24% +1%
Oukitel C15 Pro (Chrome 74)
15.6 runs/min ∼24%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (14.7 - 15.7, n=3)
15.3 runs/min ∼23% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 74)
11.57 runs/min ∼18% -26%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼100% +227%
Media della classe Smartphone (19 - 161, n=132)
63.5 Points ∼59% +92%
Huawei Y6 2019
35 Points ∼32% +6%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (33 - 35, n=3)
34.3 Points ∼32% +4%
Oukitel C15 Pro (Chrome 74)
33 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
30 Points ∼28% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
24 Points ∼22% -27%
TP-Link Neffos C9A (Chrome 73)
23 Points ∼21% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +448%
Media della classe Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=661)
6268 Points ∼26% +40%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (4437 - 4603, n=3)
4505 Points ∼18% +1%
Oukitel C15 Pro (Chrome 74)
4474 Points ∼18%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
4437 Points ∼18% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points ∼18% -3%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
3303 Points ∼13% -26%
TP-Link Neffos C9A (Chrome 73)
3167 Points ∼13% -29%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
3126 Points ∼13% -30%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼10% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
2411 Points ∼10% -46%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
TP-Link Neffos C9A (Chrome 73)
15556.6 ms * ∼100% -48%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
15334.7 ms * ∼99% -46%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
14543.1 ms * ∼93% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
13899 ms * ∼89% -32%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼89% -31%
Media della classe Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=681)
10805 ms * ∼69% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10739.7 ms * ∼69% -2%
Oukitel C15 Pro (Chrome 74)
10531.3 ms * ∼68%
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (10198 - 10531, n=3)
10364 ms * ∼67% +2%
Huawei Y6 2019
10198 ms * ∼66% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼12% +82%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Oukitel C15 ProOukitel C13 ProOukitel U25 ProTP-Link Neffos C9ANokia 2.1Xiaomi Redmi GoXiaomi Redmi 6AHuawei Y6 2019Xiaomi Mi 9Media 16 GB eMMC FlashMedia della classe Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
34%
140%
41%
51%
46%
223%
98%
1259%
-7%
86%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.05
0%
54.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
63.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
64.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
38.6 (6.38 - 65.7, n=128)
-38%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.46 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.25
-3%
71.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
84.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
83.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
57.5 (8.1 - 87.7, n=128)
-31%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
4.78
9.99
109%
16.76
251%
12.2
155%
13.45
181%
11.9
149%
52.23
993%
15
214%
165.32
3359%
7.74 (0.49 - 43.2, n=243)
62%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=710)
321%
Random Read 4KB
32.77
22.98
-30%
55.95
71%
43.11
32%
50.46
54%
45.4
39%
33.94
4%
69
111%
149.36
356%
21 (2.49 - 62.1, n=243)
-36%
44.7 (1.59 - 175, n=710)
36%
Sequential Write 256KB
30.55
69.7
128%
195.1
539%
49.64
62%
51.18
68%
54.8
79%
131.67
331%
107.78
253%
388.27
1171%
42.2 (8.74 - 106, n=243)
38%
92 (2.99 - 503, n=710)
201%
Sequential Read 256KB
267.24
264.76
-1%
284.34
6%
259.86
-3%
288.26
8%
289.3
8%
277.54
4%
279.26
4%
666.06
149%
163 (9.66 - 294, n=243)
-39%
258 (12.1 - 1468, n=710)
-3%
Asphalt 8 Airborne
0102030Tooltip
: Ø16.9 (10-22)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010Tooltip
: Ø7.41 (3-10)
Dead Trigger 2
010203040Tooltip
: Ø30 (25-31)
Carico massimo
 32.5 °C32.6 °C36.4 °C 
 32.1 °C32.4 °C36.3 °C 
 30.5 °C31.5 °C34.7 °C 
Massima: 36.4 °C
Media: 33.2 °C
29.7 °C29.9 °C31.6 °C
29.5 °C30.8 °C32 °C
29.6 °C29.9 °C31.8 °C
Massima: 32 °C
Media: 30.5 °C
Alimentazione (max)  32.4 °C | Temperatura della stanza 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 33.2 °C / 92 F, rispetto alla media di 33.1 °C / 92 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Smartphone.
(+) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 36.4 °C / 98 F, rispetto alla media di 35.6 °C / 96 F, che varia da 22.4 a 51.7 °C per questa classe Smartphone.
(+) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 32 °C / 90 F, rispetto alla media di 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 29.9 °C / 86 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.837.72525.531.93127.526.34022.321.55028.5346318.924.78020.223.810021.623.112518.719.416020.220.520017.118.525014.629.531515.939.340015.444.550016.552.263014.257.680014.563.9100013.369.2125013.469.6160013.669.6200014.268.2250014.669315013.671.8400014.474.5500014.571.7630014.266.5800014.661.51000014.858.41250014.952.71600015.242.6SPL26.581.4N0.844.6median 14.6median 58.4Delta0.81645.346.149.352.937.839.237.539.542.143.235.336.428.72925.930.529.128.826.830.823.438.522.745.822.151.920.756.620.965.319.270.918.67219.970.318.371.318.674.617.975.817.975.517.572.217.561.817.463.117.368.917.569.817.567.717.659.417.65268.830.883.722.41.554.9median 18.6median 65.32.410.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel C15 ProXiaomi Redmi Go
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel C15 Pro analisi audio

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi Go analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.66 / 2.42 / 2.44 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.43 / 4.76 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oukitel C15 Pro
3200 mAh
Oukitel C13 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C9A
3020 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Media Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
 
Media della classe Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-19%
-45%
-19%
14%
-22%
16%
-2%
3%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
1.33
-102%
1.47
-123%
1.4
-112%
0.7
-6%
1.2
-82%
0.7
-6%
0.67
-2%
0.817 (0.59 - 1.2, n=3)
-24%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=743)
-33%
Idle Average *
2.42
2.53
-5%
2.88
-19%
1.6
34%
1.2
50%
1.9
21%
1.2
50%
1.26
48%
2.09 (1.9 - 2.42, n=3)
14%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=742)
28%
Idle Maximum *
2.44
2.58
-6%
2.96
-21%
2.2
10%
1.9
22%
2.5
-2%
2
18%
1.29
47%
2.27 (1.96 - 2.44, n=3)
7%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=743)
17%
Load Average *
3.43
3.18
7%
4.74
-38%
4.2
-22%
3.2
7%
4.5
-31%
3.4
1%
3.71
-8%
3.18 (2.82 - 3.43, n=3)
7%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=737)
-18%
Load Maximum *
4.76
4.15
13%
5.99
-26%
4.9
-3%
4.8
-1%
5.5
-16%
4
16%
9.3
-95%
4.31 (3.57 - 4.76, n=3)
9%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=737)
-24%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10ore 05minuti
Oukitel C15 Pro
3200 mAh
Oukitel C13 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C9A
3020 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
WiFi v1.3
605
429
-29%
491
-19%
370
-39%
809
34%
749
24%
761
26%
546
-10%

Pro

+ design elegante
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ dual-SIM
+ espansione della scheda microSD
+ buona durata della batteria
+ display luminoso

Contro

- pannello a bassa risoluzione
- prestazioni insoddisfacenti
- fotocamere scarse
- sensore di impronte digitali difettoso
- Altoparlanti metallici
- software
Recensione dello smartphone Oukitel C15 Pro. Dispositivo di test fornito da Oukitel.
Recensione dello smartphone Oukitel C15 Pro. Dispositivo di test fornito da Oukitel.

L'Oukitel C15 Pro ha vari aspetti positivi, ma soffre di troppe debolezze per poterlo raccomandare. Il suo display a bassa risoluzione è ormai inaccettabile anche per gli smartphone sotto i 100€ (~$112$), così come il suo scarso altoparlante e il suo sensore di impronte digitali praticamente inutilizzabile. Allo stesso modo, Oukitel ha equipaggiato il dispositivo con fotocamere poco brillanti e un SoC MediaTek obsoleto. Anche la combinazione di 16 GB di memoria e 2 GB di RAM sembra scarsa nel 2019.

    L'Oukitel C15 Pro si presenta bene esteticamente, ma vi consigliamo di cercare altrove se siete sul mercato per uno smartphone economico. Il C15 Pro ha semplicemente troppi inconvenienti per essere preso sul serio.

Tutte queste carenze ci portano a una domanda curiosa. Come può Oukitel presentare l'U25 Pro, sebbene come smartphone budget, così bene, ma realizzare il C13 Pro e C15 Pro così male? In breve, il C15 Pro è uno smartphone realizzato male che sarebbe meglio evitare.

Oukitel C15 Pro - 06/18/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
77%
Tastiera
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositivo di puntamento
75%
Connettività
37 / 60 → 62%
Peso
90%
Batteria
93%
Display
84%
Prestazioni di gioco
16 / 63 → 25%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
22 / 70 → 31%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
47 / 91 → 52%
Fotocamera
36%
Media
64%
74%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione dello smartphone Oukitel C15 Pro: un dispositivo debole ed economico con un display luminoso
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-06-22 (Update: 2019-06-22)