Notebookcheck

Recensione dello Smartphone Oukitel C13 Pro

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, T. Hinum (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 05/04/2019

Uno smartphone a 70 Euro? L'economico smartphone Oukitel sembra molto impressionante per essere un dispositivo di questa fascia di prezzo. Ma è davvero lo smartphone economico da acquistare? La nostra recensione dell'Oukitel C13 Pro risponde a questa domanda.

Oukitel C13 Pro (C Serie)
Processore
Scheda grafica
PowerVR GE8100
Memoria
2048 MB 
Schermo
6.18 pollici 18.7:9, 996 x 480 pixel 179 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS LCD, lucido: si
Harddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.4 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: Jack cuffie da 3.5-mm, Lettore schede: microUSB fino a GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Sensore di movimento, sensore di prossimità
Rete
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G/GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz (B5/B8/B3/B2), 3G/WCDMA: 900/2100MHz (B8/B1), 4G/FDD-LTE: 800/900/1800/2100/2600MHz (B20/B8/B3/B1/B7), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.3 x 155.5 x 76
Batteria
3000 mAh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 8 MPix 8+2 dual camera, Camera2 API: Full
Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Cassa Mono, Tastiera: Onscreen Layout, Caricabatterie, cavo microUSB, cover di protezione in plastica, Guida rapida all'uso, Oukitel UI, 12 Mesi Garanzia, LTE Cat.4 (150 Mbps/50 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L3, senza ventola
Peso
177 gr, Alimentazione: 51 gr
Prezzo
90 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Smartphone Oukitel C13 Pro
Smartphone Oukitel C13 Pro

Confronto Dimensioni

155.5 mm 76 mm 8.3 mm 177 g153.8 mm 76 mm 9.8 mm 180 g153.6 mm 77.6 mm 9.7 mm 174 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 8.3 mm 145 g141.4 mm 66.3 mm 8.8 mm 148 g140.4 mm 70.1 mm 8.35 mm 137 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +707%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=377)
219 MBit/s ∼32% +161%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
91.2 (min: 44, max: 108) MBit/s ∼13% +9%
Oukitel C13 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
84 (min: 7, max: 105) MBit/s ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼9% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 (min: 46, max: 58) MBit/s ∼8% -34%
Cubot J3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 (min: 45, max: 59) MBit/s ∼8% -35%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼7% -42%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼100% +468%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=377)
210 MBit/s ∼39% +123%
Oukitel C13 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
94 (min: 34, max: 102) MBit/s ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
85.6 (min: 42, max: 106) MBit/s ∼16% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 48, max: 61) MBit/s ∼11% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼10% -41%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼10% -44%
Cubot J3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.9 (min: 40, max: 56) MBit/s ∼10% -45%
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø79.8 (7-105)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø94.1 (34-102)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
Modalità Foto
Modalità Foto
Modalità Bokeh
Modalità Bokeh
Modalità Mono
Modalità Mono

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
396
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 428 cd/m² Media: 401.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14.8 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 88 %
Al centro con la batteria: 388 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1492:1 (Nero: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.2 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 11.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
95.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.58
Oukitel C13 Pro
IPS LCD, 996x480, 6.18
Oukitel U25 Pro
IPS LCD, 1920x1080, 5.5
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Cubot J3
TN LED, 960x480, 5
Xiaomi Redmi Go
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
8%
10%
21%
-92%
7%
62%
Brightness middle
388
649
67%
338
-13%
404
4%
400
3%
340
-12%
593
53%
Brightness
402
623
55%
327
-19%
400
0%
401
0%
309
-23%
587
46%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
82
-7%
82
-7%
92
5%
77
-12%
94
7%
Black Level *
0.26
0.56
-115%
0.27
-4%
0.26
-0%
1.7
-554%
0.28
-8%
Contrast
1492
1159
-22%
1252
-16%
1554
4%
235
-84%
1214
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.2
7.1
23%
5.36
42%
4.28
53%
13.79
-50%
5.53
40%
0.9
90%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
18.4
12.6
32%
9.77
47%
9.97
46%
20.74
-13%
9.87
46%
2
89%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.7
9.4
20%
6.2
47%
3.5
70%
16.5
-41%
6.4
45%
1.5
87%
Gamma
2.58 85%
2.1 105%
2.345 94%
2.213 99%
3.19 69%
2.275 97%
2.27 97%
CCT
11121 58%
8629 75%
8460 77%
6899 94%
21261 31%
8198 79%
6548 99%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 51 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9630 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
33.6 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 17.2 ms Incremento
↘ 16.4 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 86 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25.4 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
45.2 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 25.6 ms Incremento
↘ 19.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 70 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (40.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1460 Points ∼20%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2115 Points ∼28% +45%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1405 Points ∼19% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1699 Points ∼23% +16%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
870 Points ∼12% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1394 Points ∼19% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼100% +412%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (1125 - 1460, n=11)
1190 Points ∼16% -18%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (870 - 21070, n=260)
4670 Points ∼62% +220%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1896 Points ∼17%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2727 Points ∼25% +44%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1602 Points ∼15% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2471 Points ∼22% +30%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
1174 Points ∼11% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1634 Points ∼15% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100% +480%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (1418 - 1896, n=13)
1592 Points ∼14% -16%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=313)
4497 Points ∼41% +137%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
675 Points ∼19%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
674 Points ∼19% 0%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
636 Points ∼18% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
825 Points ∼23% +22%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
437 Points ∼12% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
631 Points ∼18% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100% +422%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (571 - 675, n=13)
579 Points ∼16% -14%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=314)
1325 Points ∼38% +96%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5377 Points ∼60%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
3850 Points ∼43% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼35% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3192 Points ∼35% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +68%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (2630 - 5377, n=14)
2692 Points ∼30% -50%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2828 - 9868, n=322)
4852 Points ∼54% -10%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3742 Points ∼34%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5154 Points ∼47% +38%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6194 Points ∼56% +66%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2695 Points ∼25% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
4050 Points ∼37% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼100% +194%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (3742 - 4711, n=11)
3419 Points ∼31% -9%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2695 - 13531, n=491)
5277 Points ∼48% +41%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
677 Points ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
915 Points ∼24% +35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
763 Points ∼20% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼100% +455%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (573 - 677, n=13)
469 Points ∼12% -31%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=338)
1795 Points ∼48% +165%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
189 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
325 Points ∼5% +72%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
260 Points ∼4% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +3644%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (75 - 189, n=13)
74.4 Points ∼1% -61%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=338)
1542 Points ∼22% +716%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
225 Points ∼4%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
397 Points ∼7% +76%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
305 Points ∼5% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +2528%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (93 - 225, n=13)
91.1 Points ∼2% -60%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=341)
1437 Points ∼24% +539%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
698 Points ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
904 Points ∼24% +30%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼23% +27%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
807 Points ∼21% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
853 Points ∼23% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100% +443%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (530 - 698, n=13)
563 Points ∼15% -19%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=353)
1771 Points ∼47% +154%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
189 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
496 Points ∼5% +162%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼2% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
445 Points ∼4% +135%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
248 Points ∼2% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +5345%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (131 - 189, n=13)
145 Points ∼1% -23%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=353)
2119 Points ∼21% +1021%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
225 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
551 Points ∼7% +145%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼4% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
494 Points ∼7% +120%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
294 Points ∼4% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +3211%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (159 - 225, n=13)
173 Points ∼2% -23%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=354)
1801 Points ∼24% +700%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
690 Points ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
932 Points ∼25% +35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
828 Points ∼22% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼100% +445%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (486 - 690, n=14)
516 Points ∼14% -25%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=414)
1726 Points ∼46% +150%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
185 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
82 Points ∼1% -56%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
225 Points ∼4% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +3335%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (65 - 185, n=14)
78.5 Points ∼1% -58%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=416)
1269 Points ∼20% +586%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
221 Points ∼4%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
103 Points ∼2% -53%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
268 Points ∼5% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +2393%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (80 - 221, n=14)
96.5 Points ∼2% -56%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=424)
1214 Points ∼22% +449%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
690 Points ∼19%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1006 Points ∼28% +46%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼25% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
840 Points ∼23% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
878 Points ∼24% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100% +424%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (445 - 690, n=13)
552 Points ∼15% -20%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=447)
1630 Points ∼45% +136%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
185 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
109 Points ∼1% -41%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼0% -75%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
403 Points ∼4% +118%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
43 Points ∼0% -77%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +5285%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (102 - 185, n=13)
127 Points ∼1% -31%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (43 - 9983, n=447)
1722 Points ∼17% +831%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
211 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
136 Points ∼2% -36%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼1% -73%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
456 Points ∼6% +116%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
55 Points ∼1% -74%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +3296%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (120 - 211, n=13)
152 Points ∼2% -28%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=455)
1477 Points ∼21% +600%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10981 Points ∼43%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9979 Points ∼39% -9%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼41% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14128 Points ∼56% +29%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
8093 Points ∼32% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10188 Points ∼40% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼100% +131%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (7103 - 10981, n=13)
9331 Points ∼37% -15%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (8253 - 45072, n=608)
13399 Points ∼53% +22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3700 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
8856 Points ∼8% +139%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼5% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6785 Points ∼6% +83%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2469 Points ∼2% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5391 Points ∼5% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +2779%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (2878 - 4346, n=13)
3329 Points ∼3% -10%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3700 - 162695, n=608)
19295 Points ∼18% +421%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4339 Points ∼7%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9085 Points ∼15% +109%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼10% +41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7671 Points ∼12% +77%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2920 Points ∼5% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6021 Points ∼10% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼100% +1334%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (3392 - 4339, n=13)
3824 Points ∼6% -12%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4339 - 83518, n=609)
16154 Points ∼26% +272%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6.1 fps ∼4%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼10% +162%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼5% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13 fps ∼8% +113%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
4.4 fps ∼3% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼5% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +2638%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (4.9 - 6.1, n=14)
5.56 fps ∼3% -9%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (4.4 - 251, n=633)
33.7 fps ∼20% +452%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
15 fps ∼25%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼27% +7%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼23% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼32% +27%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
11 fps ∼18% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
13 fps ∼22% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +300%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (8.2 - 15, n=14)
9.84 fps ∼16% -34%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (11 - 120, n=636)
26.3 fps ∼44% +75%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.7 fps ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.1 fps ∼7% +163%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼3% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.3 fps ∼6% +133%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +3604%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (2.2 - 2.8, n=12)
2.54 fps ∼3% -6%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=551)
18.4 fps ∼18% +581%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 fps ∼17%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼13% -25%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼10% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12 fps ∼20% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5.6 fps ∼9% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +500%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (4.4 - 10, n=14)
5.64 fps ∼9% -44%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (6.2 - 115, n=556)
17.1 fps ∼29% +71%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.7 fps ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps ∼7% +176%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼6% +135%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +3959%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (1.3 - 1.7, n=14)
1.479 fps ∼2% -13%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.3 - 88, n=413)
15.4 fps ∼22% +806%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6.7 fps ∼12%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5 fps ∼9% -25%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.5 fps ∼13% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +766%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (2.6 - 6.7, n=14)
3.52 fps ∼6% -47%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (3.8 - 110, n=416)
14.8 fps ∼26% +121%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2 fps ∼8%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps ∼6% -25%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.7 fps ∼11% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +1100%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (0.61 - 2, n=2)
1.305 fps ∼5% -35%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.4 - 59, n=117)
9.31 fps ∼39% +366%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.4 fps ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
0.9 fps ∼6% +125%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0.85 fps ∼5% +113%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +3900%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (0.21 - 0.4, n=2)
0.305 fps ∼2% -24%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.4 - 31, n=117)
6.42 fps ∼40% +1505%
Normal Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.5 fps ∼7%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.2 fps ∼6% -12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼12% +72%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +1380%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (1.4 - 2.5, n=3)
2.13 fps ∼6% -15%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (2.5 - 59, n=118)
13.7 fps ∼37% +448%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.6 fps ∼1%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.3 fps ∼6% +283%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.3 (min: 4.3) fps ∼6% +283%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +6733%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (0.6 - 0.77, n=3)
0.707 fps ∼2% +18%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.6 - 63, n=117)
15.3 fps ∼37% +2450%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.6 fps ∼1%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.5 fps ∼6% +317%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.9 fps ∼5% +217%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +6900%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (0.6 - 0.91, n=12)
0.816 fps ∼2% +36%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (0.6 - 54, n=342)
10.4 fps ∼25% +1633%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.6 fps ∼7%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼7% +8%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.2 fps ∼8% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +1362%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (1.1 - 2.6, n=13)
1.554 fps ∼4% -40%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (1.8 - 58, n=346)
9.41 fps ∼25% +262%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
46951 Points ∼13%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
54871 Points ∼15% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
61753 Points ∼16% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +698%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (26874 - 46951, n=12)
42431 Points ∼11% -10%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (41483 - 374820, n=234)
126984 Points ∼34% +170%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
624 Points ∼45%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼47% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
733 Points ∼53% +17%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
587 Points ∼43% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼100% +121%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (7 - 624, n=13)
189 Points ∼14% -70%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=564)
726 Points ∼53% +16%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
190 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
641 Points ∼7% +237%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼5% +125%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
482 Points ∼5% +154%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
145 Points ∼2% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
426 Points ∼5% +124%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +4779%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (18 - 190, n=13)
157 Points ∼2% -17%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=564)
1867 Points ∼20% +883%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
818 Points ∼20%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
983 Points ∼24% +20%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼12% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
607 Points ∼15% -26%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
266 Points ∼7% -67%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
363 Points ∼9% -56%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +393%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (420 - 1034, n=13)
728 Points ∼18% -11%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=564)
1372 Points ∼34% +68%
System (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1338 Points ∼16%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1931 Points ∼23% +44%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼15% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1434 Points ∼17% +7%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
957 Points ∼11% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1210 Points ∼14% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% +531%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (1103 - 1526, n=13)
1278 Points ∼15% -4%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=564)
2740 Points ∼32% +105%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
600 Points ∼13%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
330 Points ∼7% -45%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼14% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
745 Points ∼16% +24%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
384 Points ∼8% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
207 Points ∼5% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼100% +666%
Media Mediatek MT6739
  (162 - 637, n=13)
301 Points ∼7% -50%
Media della classe Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=568)
1361 Points ∼30% +127%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Media della classe Smartphone (10.9 - 96.7, n=17)
31.9 Points ∼100% +193%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼51% +49%
Media Mediatek MT6739
10.9 Points ∼34% 0%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
10.876 Points ∼34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +685%
Media della classe Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=625)
5992 Points ∼24% +92%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼20% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points ∼18% +39%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
3303 Points ∼13% +6%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
3126 Points ∼13%
Media Mediatek MT6739 (2093 - 3202, n=13)
2894 Points ∼12% -7%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼10% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
2411 Points ∼10% -23%
Cubot J3
Points ∼0% -100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Cubot J3 (Chrome 73)
19183 ms * ∼100% -25%
Media Mediatek MT6739 (15335 - 18154, n=14)
16691 ms * ∼87% -9%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
15334.7 ms * ∼80%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
14543.1 ms * ∼76% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
13899 ms * ∼72% +9%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼72% +10%
Media della classe Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=644)
11028 ms * ∼57% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10739.7 ms * ∼56% +30%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼53% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼10% +88%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Oukitel C13 ProOukitel U25 ProNokia 2.1Xiaomi Redmi 6ACubot J3Xiaomi Redmi GoXiaomi Mi 9Media 16 GB eMMC FlashMedia della classe Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
62%
23%
96%
-63%
19%
679%
-30%
26%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.05
54.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
15.9 (Kingston 32GB)
-74%
63.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
38.1 (6.38 - 65.4, n=121)
-39%
47.8 (9.5 - 87.1, n=380)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.25
71.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
8.1 (Kingston 32GB)
-90%
84.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
56.9 (8.1 - 87.7, n=121)
-30%
65.9 (8.1 - 96.5, n=380)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
9.99
16.76
68%
13.45
35%
52.23
423%
5.5
-45%
11.9
19%
165.32
1555%
7.67 (0.49 - 43.2, n=235)
-23%
18.8 (0.14 - 250, n=677)
88%
Random Read 4KB
22.98
55.95
143%
50.46
120%
33.94
48%
14.6
-36%
45.4
98%
149.36
550%
20.5 (2.49 - 61.7, n=235)
-11%
42.7 (1.59 - 174, n=677)
86%
Sequential Write 256KB
69.7
195.1
180%
51.18
-27%
131.67
89%
12.1
-83%
54.8
-21%
388.27
457%
41.7 (8.74 - 97.6, n=235)
-40%
88.3 (2.99 - 388, n=677)
27%
Sequential Read 256KB
264.76
284.34
7%
288.26
9%
277.54
5%
130.6
-51%
289.3
9%
666.06
152%
161 (9.66 - 294, n=235)
-39%
248 (12.1 - 912, n=677)
-6%
Carico massimo
 33.4 °C32.9 °C31.1 °C 
 33 °C31.1 °C32.1 °C 
 31 °C29.5 °C31.5 °C 
Massima: 33.4 °C
Media: 31.7 °C
29.4 °C29.9 °C35.9 °C
28.8 °C30.1 °C34.7 °C
27.8 °C30.4 °C33.6 °C
Massima: 35.9 °C
Media: 31.2 °C
Alimentazione (max)  32.6 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 31.7 °C / 89 F, rispetto alla media di 33 °C / 91 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Smartphone.
(+) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 33.4 °C / 92 F, rispetto alla media di 35.5 °C / 96 F, che varia da 22.4 a 51.7 °C per questa classe Smartphone.
(+) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 35.9 °C / 97 F, rispetto alla media di 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 28.3 °C / 83 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.536.32523.730.53125.828.54022.2265033.128.86326.621.48024.220.610023.321.812521.816.616022.520.220018.223.925016.334.731515.646.440015.15250014.155.763013.960.780013.669100014.872.7125013.675160013.674.3200013.871.2250014.373315014.674.3400014.580.4500014.677.6630014.872.3800014.673.31000014.969.11250014.9571600014.942.2SPL26.686.5N0.861.6median 14.8median 69Delta1.51619.929.620.223.721.42622.925.626.933.418.220.722.820.819.121.315.817.516.52014.217.713.326.315.334.314.64214.748.414.555.713.76514.472.713.973.813.971.113.867.313.869.314.268.914.37014.671.414.674.214.379.31579.71573.314.759.926.384.70.855median 14.5median 67.30.716.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel C13 ProOukitel U25 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel C13 Pro analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Oukitel U25 Pro analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 44.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.33 / 2.53 / 2.58 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.18 / 4.15 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oukitel C13 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Cubot J3
2000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Media Mediatek MT6739
 
Media della classe Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-27%
22%
24%
6%
-7%
2%
-21%
4%
Idle Minimum *
1.33
1.47
-11%
0.7
47%
0.7
47%
0.7
47%
1.2
10%
0.67
50%
1.522 (0.87 - 2.8, n=16)
-14%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=710)
34%
Idle Average *
2.53
2.88
-14%
1.2
53%
1.2
53%
1.5
41%
1.9
25%
1.26
50%
2.17 (1.6 - 3.5, n=16)
14%
1.734 (0.6 - 6.2, n=709)
31%
Idle Maximum *
2.58
2.96
-15%
1.9
26%
2
22%
2
22%
2.5
3%
1.29
50%
2.86 (1.68 - 6.3, n=16)
-11%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=710)
22%
Load Average *
3.18
4.74
-49%
3.2
-1%
3.4
-7%
4.6
-45%
4.5
-42%
3.71
-17%
4.73 (2.8 - 7, n=16)
-49%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=704)
-28%
Load Maximum *
4.15
5.99
-44%
4.8
-16%
4
4%
5.6
-35%
5.5
-33%
9.3
-124%
5.99 (3.5 - 11.9, n=16)
-44%
5.85 (1.2 - 14.2, n=704)
-41%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7ore 9minuti
Oukitel C13 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Cubot J3
2000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
WiFi v1.3
429
491
14%
809
89%
761
77%
432
1%
749
75%
546
27%

Pro

+ prezzo basso
+ buona qualità costruttiva
+ Pannello IPS con un buon rapporto di contrasto

Contro

- SoC lento
- non c'è molta RAM
- non c'è molto spazio di archiviazione
- display a bassa risoluzione

Giudizio Complessivo - Things were better, Oukitel…

Recensione dello smartphone Oukitel C13 Pro. Modello gentilmente fornito da Oukitel.
Recensione dello smartphone Oukitel C13 Pro. Modello gentilmente fornito da Oukitel.

Il C13 Pro del produttore cinese Oukitel si lancia nella terra degli smartphones sotto i 100-Euro. Tuttavia, a differenza di suo cugino l'U25 Pro, che abbiamo raccomandato e che costa poco di più, il C13 Pro non riesce a impressionare. Il display a bassa risoluzione non è più appropriato anche per uno smartphone così economico. La fotocamera non è adatta anche per scatti impegnativi.

    Con il suo smartphone da 6,18 pollici, Oukitel sembra aver tagliato i costi in tutti i posti sbagliati.   

Il dispositivo, che è realizzato in plastica, è piacevole da tenere in mano. Grazie alla bassa densità di pixel, il SoC relativamente debole offre prestazioni di sistema solide. Il C13 Pro può anche eseguire i titoli correnti dal Google Play Store.

Oukitel C13 Pro - 04/26/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
80%
Tastiera
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositivo di puntamento
78%
Connettività
36 / 60 → 60%
Peso
90%
Batteria
89%
Display
78%
Prestazioni di gioco
11 / 63 → 17%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
37 / 70 → 52%
Temperatura
93%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 61%
Fotocamera
48%
Media
66%
75%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione dello Smartphone Oukitel C13 Pro
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-05- 4 (Update: 2019-05- 4)