Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Asus FX553VD (7700HQ, GTX 1050)

Christian Hintze (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 04/26/2017

In cerca dell'eccezionale. Mettiamo sotto test l'Asus FX553VD e valutiamo se l'FX553 rispecchia il motto Asus "alla ricerca dell'incredibile", o se Asus deve continuare a cercare. Rispetto ai modello gemelli che montano una GTX 1060 per un prezzo simile, riuscirà il notebook a mostrare abbastanza argomenti a favore dell'acquisto?

Asus FX553VD-DM249T (FX Serie)
Processore
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz @ 3.8 GHz
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) - 2048 MB, NVIDIA, Umschaltbar auf Intel HD Graphics 630
Memoria
8192 MB 
, 1 slot occupato
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, no, BOE, TN, Nome: BOE CQ NT156FHM-N41, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel HM175
Harddisk
Hynix HFS128G39TND, 128 GB 
, Dispositivo di archiviazione secondario: Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Scheda audio
Conexant @ Intel Skylake PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: porta combinata microfono/cuffia, Lettore schede: Realtek PCIE card reader
Rete
Realtek RTL8168B/8111B (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth Intel(R) Wireless Bluetooth(R)
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 31 x 385 x 258
Batteria
48 Wh ioni di litio, 4 celle
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: webcam HD
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Casse Stereo, Tastiera: Tastiera Chiclet con retroilluminazione rossa, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2.378 kg, Alimentazione: 571 gr
Prezzo
1070 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Back: no features
Back: no features
Right: USB 2.0 port A, slot for Kensington-Lock, and dummy DVD drawer
Right: USB 2.0 port A, slot for Kensington-Lock, and dummy DVD drawer
Front: speakers and memory card reader
Front: speakers and memory card reader
Left: LAN, HDMI, 2x USB-3.0 Type-A, USB 3.0 Type-C, headphone/microphone jack
Left: LAN, HDMI, 2x USB-3.0 Type-A, USB 3.0 Type-C, headphone/microphone jack
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
83.8 MB/s ∼100%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
78.8 MB/s ∼94% -6%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
71.2 MB/s ∼85% -15%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
26 MB/s ∼31% -69%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
23.2 MB/s ∼28% -72%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
22.2 MB/s ∼26% -74%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
90.4 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
87.9 MB/s ∼97%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
86.9 MB/s ∼96% -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
27.7 MB/s ∼31% -68%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
27.6 MB/s ∼31% -69%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
27.2 MB/s ∼30% -69%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
635 MBit/s ∼100% +22%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
541 MBit/s ∼85% +4%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s ∼84% +2%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
521 MBit/s ∼82%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
347 MBit/s ∼55% -33%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
246 MBit/s ∼39% -53%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
666 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
653 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
532 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
513 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
312 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
306 MBit/s ∼46% -54%
222
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
221
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
206
cd/m²
204
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 225 cd/m² Media: 215.4 cd/m² Minimum: 12.6 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 91 %
Al centro con la batteria: 227 cd/m²
Contrasto: 489:1 (Nero: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.94 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.68 | - Ø
57% sRGB (Argyll) 36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.35
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
BOE, , 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Chi Mei N156HGE-EAL, , 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
AU Optronics AUO41ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
AU Optronics AUO38ED B156HTN 28H80, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX502VM-AS73
1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-83%
-75%
-30%
-106%
-35%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43 (24, 19, plateau)
44 (24, 20)
-2%
44.4 (15.2, 29.2)
-3%
22 (10, 12)
49%
36 (17, 19)
16%
28.4 (11.2, 17.2)
34%
Response Time Black / White *
11 (7, 4)
29 (12, 17)
-164%
27.2 (6.8, 20.4)
-147%
23 (13, 10)
-109%
36 (19, 17)
-227%
22.4 (6, 16.4)
-104%
PWM Frequency
198 (90)
Screen
-40%
-13%
3%
-82%
-10%
Brightness
215
234
9%
193
-10%
257
20%
235
9%
205
-5%
Brightness Distribution
91
79
-13%
75
-18%
85
-7%
75
-18%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.46
0.54
-17%
0.19
59%
0.32
30%
0.55
-20%
0.69
-50%
Contrast
489
478
-2%
1104
126%
878
80%
447
-9%
304
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.94
9.74
-147%
7.8
-98%
5.16
-31%
10.97
-178%
4.7
-19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.68
11.59
-332%
7.3
-172%
4.57
-71%
14.25
-432%
1.8
33%
Gamma
2.35 102%
21.9 11%
2.39 100%
2.59 93%
1.83 131%
2.23 108%
CCT
6709 97%
11851 55%
5771 113%
6931 94%
11200 58%
6975 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36
76
111%
39.3
9%
37
3%
35
-3%
36.2
1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57
100
75%
56.5
-1%
58
2%
55
-4%
56.6
-1%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-62% / -48%
-44% / -26%
-14% / -3%
-94% / -87%
-23% / -15%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

ColorChecker
ColorChecker
Grayscale
Grayscale
Saturation
Saturation

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms Incremento
↘ 4 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms Incremento
↘ 19 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected90 % brightness setting

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6668 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼83% +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼82% +9%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼77% +3%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points ∼75% 0%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
146 Points ∼75% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points ∼75%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
140 Points ∼72% -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
741 Points ∼34% +1%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼34%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼34% 0%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
725 Points ∼34% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
724 Points ∼34% -1%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
719 Points ∼33% -2%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
508 Points ∼24% -31%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼82% +9%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.67 Points ∼76% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.67 Points ∼76%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points ∼75% -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points ∼34% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼34%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.99 Points ∼33% -2%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6.81 Points ∼29% -16%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6832
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
28648
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7647
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
0.94 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.67 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.14 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
0.99 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
146 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
733 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
5068 Points ∼78% +1%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5040 Points ∼77%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4831 Points ∼74% -4%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4442 Points ∼68% -12%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
2880 Points ∼44% -43%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
2722 Points ∼42% -46%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4765 Points ∼80% +24%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
4182 Points ∼70% +9%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3899 Points ∼65% +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
3850 Points ∼64% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
3832 Points ∼64%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3565 Points ∼60% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3832 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5040 punti
Aiuto
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Hynix HFS128G39TND
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
Asus FX502VM-AS73
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-80%
44%
-84%
50%
-3%
Write 4k QD32
136.4
1.234
-99%
140.2
3%
0.893
-99%
255.1
87%
99.74
-27%
Read 4k QD32
348.2
1.088
-100%
400.9
15%
0.718
-100%
279.6
-20%
369.9
6%
Write 4k
76.76
1.122
-99%
89.84
17%
0.846
-99%
85.44
11%
70.91
-8%
Read 4k
29.74
0.494
-98%
33.12
11%
0.327
-99%
27.11
-9%
29.36
-1%
Write 512
136.9
56.98
-58%
185.4
35%
28.31
-79%
304
122%
137.8
1%
Read 512
340.9
43.19
-87%
399.7
17%
28.33
-92%
338.9
-1%
343.5
1%
Write Seq
136.2
107.3
-21%
476.6
250%
100.6
-26%
422.8
210%
138.2
1%
Read Seq
503.7
112.4
-78%
522.1
4%
101.5
-80%
485.8
-4%
502.5
0%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14732 Points ∼29% +92%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9768 Points ∼19% +27%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9725 Points ∼19% +27%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8223 Points ∼16% +7%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7664 Points ∼15%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7564 Points ∼15% -1%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
11633 Points ∼29% +91%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7791 Points ∼19% +28%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7646 Points ∼19% +25%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6382 Points ∼16% +5%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6100 Points ∼15% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6094 Points ∼15%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9845 Points ∼42% +79%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6774 Points ∼29% +23%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6709 Points ∼29% +22%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5729 Points ∼25% +4%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5528 Points ∼24% 0%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5508 Points ∼24%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
80496 Points ∼49% +115%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
49539 Points ∼30% +32%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
46362 Points ∼28% +24%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
39824 Points ∼24% +6%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
38748 Points ∼24% +3%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
37469 Points ∼23%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
25979 Points ∼53% +33%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21998 Points ∼44% +13%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
20791 Points ∼42% +7%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
19978 Points ∼40% +2%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
19877 Points ∼40% +2%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
19501 Points ∼39%
3DMark 11 Performance
7471 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
19501 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5508 punti
Aiuto
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
25.2 (min: 19) fps ∼100% +10%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
23 fps ∼91%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
21.4 fps ∼85% -7%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
45.8 (min: 30) fps ∼100% +29%
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
39.9 fps ∼87% +12%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
35.6 fps ∼78%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
70.1 fps ∼100% +12%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
62.7 fps ∼89%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
120.4 fps ∼100% +32%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
91 fps ∼76%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
61.3 fps ∼100% +92%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
38.3 fps ∼62% +20%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
33.7 fps ∼55% +5%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
32 fps ∼52%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
46.6 fps ∼100% +23%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
39.5 fps ∼85% +4%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
38 fps ∼82%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
86.6 fps ∼100% +31%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
70 fps ∼81% +6%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
66 fps ∼76%
1024x768 Lowest Preset
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
120 fps ∼100%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
117.5 fps ∼98% -2%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
115.3 fps ∼96% -4%
Doom
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
95.1 fps ∼100% +121%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
67.5 fps ∼71% +57%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
43 fps ∼45%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
69.1 fps ∼100% +57%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
44 fps ∼64%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
73.3 fps ∼100% +36%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
54 fps ∼74%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
105.3 fps ∼100% +46%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
72 fps ∼68%
1280x720 Low Preset
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
117 fps ∼100% +14%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
103 fps ∼88%
basso medio alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 9162.735.623fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 120663832fps
Doom (2016) 103724443fps

Rumorosità

Idle
32.9 / 32.9 / 33.5 dB(A)
HDD
32.9 dB(A)
Sotto carico
43.7 / 47 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2048.34242.435.148.32541.340.53933.841.33136.539.233.830.636.54033.832.933.728.633.85033.432.131.428.633.46333.634.93130.633.68032.631.932.327.232.610032.93428.726.532.912529.929.426.42629.916030.730.427.225.130.720028.527.926.323.928.525028.928.425.122.228.9315302825.622.33040029.9282621.429.950030.928.223.120.430.963031.428.822.419.631.480034.931.92318.734.910003632.722.418.236125033.531.120.71833.5160037.735.220.117.937.7200040.33719.617.540.3250037.933.719.117.237.931503531.719.217.235400030.726.1191730.7500028.42419.117.228.463002621.91917.126800023.220.618.917.123.210000212018.917.1211250020.119.618.816.920.11600020.119.61916.920.1SPL46.943.732.930.346.9N5.24.11.91.45.2median 30.7Asus FX553VD-DM249Tmedian 28.4median 20.7median 18median 30.7Delta3.53.932.83.5hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carico massimo
 39.2 °C36 °C28.2 °C 
 44.2 °C33.5 °C27.1 °C 
 41.4 °C31.5 °C26.4 °C 
Massima: 44.2 °C
Media: 34.2 °C
24.3 °C30.5 °C40 °C
24.9 °C33.1 °C38 °C
25 °C26.6 °C28.8 °C
Massima: 40 °C
Media: 30.1 °C
Alimentazione (max)  46 °C | Temperatura della stanza 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 0.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4 / 6.7 / 9.6 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 81 / 107 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Hynix HFS128G39TND, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel SSDSCKKF256H6, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX502VM-AS73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-75%
-34%
-38%
-3%
-105%
Idle Minimum *
4
10.6
-165%
8.29
-107%
7
-75%
4.4
-10%
14.9
-273%
Idle Average *
6.7
14.5
-116%
8.9
-33%
10.2
-52%
6.8
-1%
15.1
-125%
Idle Maximum *
9.6
15
-56%
10.2
-6%
14
-46%
8.3
14%
15.2
-58%
Load Average *
81
90
-11%
77.1
5%
78
4%
81
-0%
105.8
-31%
Load Maximum *
107
135
-26%
136.6
-28%
127
-19%
127
-19%
148.8
-39%
Witcher 3 ultra *
90

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
9ore 47minuti
Navigazione WiFi
0ore 00minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
6ore 00minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
0ore 56minuti
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 48 Wh
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 41 Wh
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 63.3 Wh
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 52.5 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 74 Wh
Asus FX502VM-AS73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
-33%
59%
-5%
73%
-16%
Reader / Idle
587
387
-34%
961
64%
322
-45%
1174
100%
363
-38%
WiFi v1.3
360
225
-37%
389
8%
302
-16%
622
73%
277
-23%
Load
56
41
-27%
115
105%
81
45%
81
45%
64
14%
H.264
217
455

L'Asus FX553 è un portatile multimedia di fascia medio alta, ma è anche un dispositivo gaming Asus di fascia media entry-level. L'FX553 ha punteggi migliori come portatile multimedia, per questo motivo lo abbiamo osservato prevalentemente sotto quest'ottica. Nel multimedia il dispositivo guadagna due punti in più, diventando un tuttofare. In termini di prestazioni pure, il dispositivo non ha punti deboli, e l'hardware utilizzato mantiene le promesse fatte. Ma tutti gli altri componenti nel migliore dei casi sono nella media.

La nostra principale critica riguarda il case con la cover morbida e la tastiera che cede sotto pressione, e poi il display scuro e con contrasto basso, infine la scomoda distribuzione del calore sulla superficie sinistra.

D'altro canto, non vi sbaglierete nel suo acquisto. Avrete un economico portatile gaming e multimedia che riesce a gestire i giochi attuali e non si scalda troppo né è rumoroso.Ovviamente dovete valutare che un vero gamer come l'FX502 con GTX 1060 è più costoso. Nel gaming è veloce quasi il doppio, ma sfortunatamente è anche più rumoroso e si scalda di più. Quindi è una decisione di compromesso tra prestazioni da un lato ed emissioni e peso dall'altro. 

L'Asus FX553VD è un tuttofare potente, attraente e ma tecnicamente niente di speciale.

Rispetto ai concorrenti con dotazioni simili, l'FX553 è nella fascia medio bassa. E' più paragonabile ad un MSI; gli altri dispositivi come HP o Dell fanno un po' meglio. In termini di offerta, pensiamo che il prezzo di circa 1100 Euro (~$1177) sia troppo alto. I competitors costano poco meno di 1000 Euro (~$1070) in alcuni casi. Anche l'FX502 dello stesso produttore costa tra 100 e 200 Euro (~$107 to $214) in più e monta 16 GB di RAM ed una GTX 1060.

Con l'attuale modello il motto "alla ricerca dell'incredibile", diventa difficile. Il design e i bassi consumi energetici forse lo sono; tutti gli altri valori non sono nulla di speciale. Il target consiste nelle persone che vogliono un portatile multimedia ragionevolmente potente, ma non si interessano della qualità di costruzione. L'Asus FX553 non è troppo costoso, non troppo pesante, non troppo rumoroso o caldo. E' veloce ma non è un dispositivo high-end.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Pro

+ solide performance
+ consumi contenuti
+ tasti silenziosi
+ dimensioni compatte

Contro

- mediocre pannello TN
- ventola sempre attiva
- solo 2 GB nella versione GTX 1050
- cover spugnosa
- la tastiera cede sotto pressione
- distribuzione delle temperature scomoda
The Asus FX553VD, provided by: Notebooksbilliger.de
The Asus FX553VD, provided by: Notebooksbilliger.de

The Asus FX553 is actually a multimedia notebook of the upper mid-range, but it is also Asus' entry-level gaming device. The FX553 fares better in the rating as a multimedia notebook, for which reason we see it in that category, preferably. In the multimedia area the device can earn 2 points more, being an all-rounder. Purely in terms of performance, the device offers no weaknesses, and the built-in hardware keeps what it promised on paper. But all the other components remain average at most.

Our strongest points of criticism go foremost to the casing with the spongy lid and the keyboard giving in under pressure, then also the dark and contrast-poor display, and finally the troublesome heat distribution on the left surface.

On the other hand, you do not go much wrong purchasing it. You are getting an affordable gaming and multimedia laptop that can display all the current games smoothly and does not get too hot or loud doing it. Of course you have to weigh up whether to get a "real" gamer with the just slightly more expensive FX502 sibling with the GTX 1060. That is almost twice as fast in gaming, but unfortunately also louder and hotter. So it is a compromise decision between performance on the one hand and temperature/volume/weight on the other. 

The Asus FX553VD is a powerful, visually attractive, but technically unremarkable all-rounder.

Compared to the similarly equipped competitors, the FX553 comes in at the lower mid-field. It is mostly comparable to the MSI; the other devices such as the HP or Dell model are a little better. In terms of what is offered, we find the price of around 1100 Euros (~$1177) almost too high. The competitors can be purchased for a little under 1000 Euros (~$1070) in some cases and do not fare worse at all. Even the FX502 from the same manufacturer costs only about 100 to 200 Euros (~$107 to $214) more and is equipped with 16 GB of RAM and a GTX 1060.

With the actual model here, the "search for the incredible" becomes difficult. The design and low power consumption qualify perhaps the most; all the other values end up in the unremarkable mid-range. The target audience therefore consists of people who want a reasonably powerful multimedia notebook, but do not care too much about good quality or fine tuning. The Asus FX553 is not too expensive, too heavy, too loud, or too hot. It is fast, but no high-end device.

Asus FX553VD-DM249T - 04/19/2017 v6
Christian Hintze

Chassis
78 / 98 → 79%
Tastiera
83%
Dispositivo di puntamento
78%
Connettività
48 / 81 → 60%
Peso
61 / 67 → 86%
Batteria
88%
Display
82%
Prestazioni di gioco
88 / 85 → 100%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
91 / 92 → 99%
Temperatura
75%
Rumorosità
76 / 95 → 80%
Audio
72%
Fotocamera
55 / 85 → 65%
Media
75%
83%
Multimedia - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Asus FX553VD (7700HQ, GTX 1050)
Christian Hintze, 2017-04-26 (Update: 2017-04-26)