Notebookcheck

Recensione dello Smartphone Umidigi Z2

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 11/21/2018

Colorato. Il case dell'Umdigigi Z2 attira con i suoi colori cangianti e l'hardware offre prestazioni sufficienti anche per i compiti più impegnativi. Nel nostro test valutiamo se lo Z2 è in grado di affermarsi contro i concorrenti.

Umidigi Z2 (Z Serie)
Processore
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V 2 GHz, Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Memoria
6144 MB 
Schermo
6.2 pollici 18.7:9, 2246 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitive, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB libera
Porte di connessione
2 USB 2.0, Lettore schede: microSD (FAT, FAT32, vFAT), 1 Lettore impronte digitali, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: sensore di prossimità, bussola, giroscopio, sensore di accelerazione
Rete
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (800/850/900/1800/1900), 3G (1/2/4/5/8/34/39), 4G LTE FDD/TDD (1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28A/28B/34/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 8.3 x 153.4 x 74.4
Batteria
3850 mAh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 16 MPix f/1.7
Fotocamera Secondaria: 16 MPix f/2.0
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: 1, Tastiera: onscreen, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Caricabatterie USB, cavo USB tipo C, coperchio di protezione, strumento SIM, adattatore da USB tipo C a 3,5 mm, 12 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
165 gr, Alimentazione: 75 gr
Prezzo
240 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Umidigi Z2
Umidigi Z2
Umidigi Z2
Umidigi Z2
Umidigi Z2
Umidigi Z2

Confronto Dimensioni

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=302)
210 MBit/s ∼100% +69%
Honor Play
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
188 MBit/s ∼90% +52%
Umidigi Z2
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash
124 (min: 105, max: 122) MBit/s ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
119 MBit/s ∼57% -4%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.5 (min: 43, max: 58) MBit/s ∼29% -50%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
43 MBit/s ∼20% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=302)
205 MBit/s ∼100% +93%
Honor Play
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
190 MBit/s ∼93% +79%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼55% +7%
Umidigi Z2
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash
106 (min: 90, max: 112) MBit/s ∼52%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
47.6 MBit/s ∼23% -55%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
36 (min: 2, max: 52) MBit/s ∼18% -66%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø114 (105-122)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø106 (90-112)
GPS Umidigi Z2
GPS Umidigi Z2
GPS Umidigi Z2
GPS Umidigi Z2
GPS Umidigi Z2
GPS Umidigi Z2
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
Umidigi Z2 - grafico di test
Umidigi Z2 - grafico di test
Umidigi Z2 - grafico di test (dettaglio)
491
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 525 cd/m² Media: 466.2 cd/m² Minimum: 18.2 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 76 %
Al centro con la batteria: 472 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1073:1 (Nero: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.91 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 10.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.417
Umidigi Z2
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2
Wiko View 2 Pro
IPS, 1528x720, 6
Honor Play
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
LG Q Stylus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.2
Screen
2%
25%
47%
16%
Brightness middle
472
562
19%
435
-8%
519
10%
458
-3%
Brightness
466
541
16%
426
-9%
513
10%
441
-5%
Brightness Distribution
76
92
21%
89
17%
93
22%
94
24%
Black Level *
0.44
0.56
-27%
0.39
11%
0.51
-16%
Contrast
1073
1004
-6%
1115
4%
898
-16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.91
7.9
-0%
2.89
63%
1.8
77%
4.5
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
14.85
15.7
-6%
6.03
59%
3.6
76%
7.1
52%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
10.6
10.4
2%
4.1
61%
1.5
86%
5.1
52%
Gamma
2.417 91%
2.02 109%
2.251 98%
2.06 107%
2.33 94%
CCT
9374 69%
8834 74%
7408 88%
6462 101%
7381 88%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8964 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
42 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 21 ms Incremento
↘ 21 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 97 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
42 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 19 ms Incremento
↘ 23 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 53 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
2904 Points ∼34%
Wiko View 2 Pro
3362 Points ∼40% +16%
Honor Play
8454 Points ∼100% +191%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3229 Points ∼38% +11%
LG Q Stylus
1909 Points ∼23% -34%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
2904 Points ∼34% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=196)
4525 Points ∼54% +56%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
3677 Points ∼55%
Wiko View 2 Pro
4022 Points ∼60% +9%
Honor Play
6673 Points ∼100% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3912 Points ∼59% +6%
LG Q Stylus
2798 Points ∼42% -24%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
3677 Points ∼55% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=246)
4306 Points ∼65% +17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
788 Points ∼41%
Wiko View 2 Pro
778 Points ∼41% -1%
Honor Play
1904 Points ∼100% +142%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
754 Points ∼40% -4%
LG Q Stylus
653 Points ∼34% -17%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
788 Points ∼41% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=247)
1269 Points ∼67% +61%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
5840 Points ∼63%
Wiko View 2 Pro
5395 Points ∼58% -8%
Honor Play
9326 Points ∼100% +60%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
5199 Points ∼56% -11%
LG Q Stylus
4101 Points ∼44% -30%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
5840 Points ∼63% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=422)
4954 Points ∼53% -15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
1663 Points ∼62%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1808 Points ∼67% +9%
Honor Play
2702 Points ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1780 Points ∼66% +7%
LG Q Stylus
1110 Points ∼41% -33%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
1663 Points ∼62% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2386 - 4439, n=276)
1707 Points ∼63% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
385 Points ∼13%
Wiko View 2 Pro
415 Points ∼14% +8%
Honor Play
3041 Points ∼100% +690%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
412 Points ∼14% +7%
LG Q Stylus
319 Points ∼10% -17%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
385 Points ∼13% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=276)
1467 Points ∼48% +281%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
464 Points ∼16%
Wiko View 2 Pro
501 Points ∼17% +8%
Honor Play
2959 Points ∼100% +538%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
497 Points ∼17% +7%
LG Q Stylus
379 Points ∼13% -18%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
464 Points ∼16% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (1012 - 5189, n=279)
1361 Points ∼46% +193%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
1473 Points ∼51%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1810 Points ∼63% +23%
Honor Play
2885 Points ∼100% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1773 Points ∼61% +20%
LG Q Stylus
1112 Points ∼39% -25%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
1473 Points ∼51% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=291)
1687 Points ∼58% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
603 Points ∼15%
Wiko View 2 Pro
716 Points ∼18% +19%
Honor Play
4040 Points ∼100% +570%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
713 Points ∼18% +18%
LG Q Stylus
495 Points ∼12% -18%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
603 Points ∼15% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=291)
2071 Points ∼51% +243%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
694 Points ∼19%
Wiko View 2 Pro
827 Points ∼22% +19%
Honor Play
3710 Points ∼100% +435%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
822 Points ∼22% +18%
LG Q Stylus
565 Points ∼15% -19%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
694 Points ∼19% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=292)
1734 Points ∼47% +150%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
1570 Points ∼56%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1855 Points ∼66% +18%
Honor Play
2827 Points ∼100% +80%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1852 Points ∼66% +18%
LG Q Stylus
1172 Points ∼41% -25%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
1570 Points ∼56% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=351)
1640 Points ∼58% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
368 Points ∼12%
Wiko View 2 Pro
369 Points ∼12% 0%
Honor Play
3018 Points ∼100% +720%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
366 Points ∼12% -1%
LG Q Stylus
89 Points ∼3% -76%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
368 Points ∼12% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=351)
1187 Points ∼39% +223%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
443 Points ∼15%
Wiko View 2 Pro
449 Points ∼15% +1%
Honor Play
2973 Points ∼100% +571%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
445 Points ∼15% 0%
LG Q Stylus
112 Points ∼4% -75%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
443 Points ∼15% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=359)
1134 Points ∼38% +156%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
1562 Points ∼55%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1833 Points ∼65% +17%
Honor Play
2832 Points ∼100% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1832 Points ∼65% +17%
LG Q Stylus
1172 Points ∼41% -25%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
1562 Points ∼55% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=383)
1538 Points ∼54% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
583 Points ∼16%
Wiko View 2 Pro
706 Points ∼19% +21%
Honor Play
3734 Points ∼100% +540%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
692 Points ∼19% +19%
LG Q Stylus
98 Points ∼3% -83%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
583 Points ∼16% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=383)
1632 Points ∼44% +180%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
677 Points ∼19%
Wiko View 2 Pro
818 Points ∼23% +21%
Honor Play
3487 Points ∼100% +415%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
803 Points ∼23% +19%
LG Q Stylus
123 Points ∼4% -82%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
677 Points ∼19% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=391)
1387 Points ∼40% +105%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
10349 Points ∼52%
Wiko View 2 Pro
15177 Points ∼76% +47%
Honor Play
20035 Points ∼100% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
13988 Points ∼70% +35%
LG Q Stylus
10050 Points ∼50% -3%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
10349 Points ∼52% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=538)
12873 Points ∼64% +24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
10960 Points ∼31%
Wiko View 2 Pro
12550 Points ∼36% +15%
Honor Play
34836 Points ∼100% +218%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
12527 Points ∼36% +14%
LG Q Stylus
9864 Points ∼28% -10%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
10960 Points ∼31% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=538)
17989 Points ∼52% +64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
10818 Points ∼36%
Wiko View 2 Pro
12878 Points ∼43% +19%
Honor Play
29924 Points ∼100% +177%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
12825 Points ∼43% +19%
LG Q Stylus
9905 Points ∼33% -8%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
10818 Points ∼36% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=539)
15106 Points ∼50% +40%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
22 fps ∼19%
Wiko View 2 Pro
22 fps ∼19% 0%
Honor Play
115 fps ∼100% +423%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
22 fps ∼19% 0%
LG Q Stylus
17 fps ∼15% -23%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
22 fps ∼19% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=563)
31.3 fps ∼27% +42%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
21 fps ∼35%
Wiko View 2 Pro
33 fps ∼55% +57%
Honor Play
60 fps ∼100% +186%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
20 fps ∼33% -5%
LG Q Stylus
16 fps ∼27% -24%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
21 fps ∼35% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=566)
24.9 fps ∼42% +19%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
10 fps ∼16%
Wiko View 2 Pro
9.4 fps ∼15% -6%
Honor Play
62 fps ∼100% +520%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
9.3 fps ∼15% -7%
LG Q Stylus
7.1 fps ∼11% -29%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
10 fps ∼16% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=485)
16.8 fps ∼27% +68%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
9.7 fps ∼18%
Wiko View 2 Pro
17 fps ∼31% +75%
Honor Play
55 fps ∼100% +467%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
8.9 fps ∼16% -8%
LG Q Stylus
6.7 fps ∼12% -31%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
9.7 fps ∼18% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=488)
16 fps ∼29% +65%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
6.6 fps ∼17%
Wiko View 2 Pro
6.1 fps ∼16% -8%
Honor Play
39 fps ∼100% +491%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
6.1 fps ∼16% -8%
LG Q Stylus
4.7 fps ∼12% -29%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
6.6 fps ∼17% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (10 - 88, n=348)
14.4 fps ∼37% +118%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
6.1 fps ∼20%
Wiko View 2 Pro
12 fps ∼39% +97%
Honor Play
31 fps ∼100% +408%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
5.8 fps ∼19% -5%
LG Q Stylus
4.5 fps ∼15% -26%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
6.1 fps ∼20% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=351)
13.9 fps ∼45% +128%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
2.2 fps ∼17%
Honor Play
13 fps ∼100% +491%
LG Q Stylus
1.3 fps ∼10% -41%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
2.2 fps ∼17% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=61)
10.3 fps ∼79% +368%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
1.4 fps ∼16%
Honor Play
8.6 fps ∼100% +514%
LG Q Stylus
0.86 fps ∼10% -39%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
1.4 fps ∼16% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=61)
6.56 fps ∼76% +369%
Normal Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
3.5 fps ∼16%
Honor Play
22 fps ∼100% +529%
LG Q Stylus
2 fps ∼9% -43%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
3.5 fps ∼16% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=61)
14.5 fps ∼66% +314%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
3.8 fps ∼16%
Honor Play
24 fps ∼100% +532%
LG Q Stylus
2.3 fps ∼10% -39%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
3.8 fps ∼16% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (6 - 63, n=60)
15.9 fps ∼66% +318%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
3.9 fps ∼20%
Wiko View 2 Pro
3.5 fps ∼18% -10%
Honor Play
20 fps ∼100% +413%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3.5 fps ∼18% -10%
LG Q Stylus
2.5 fps ∼13% -36%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
3.9 fps ∼20% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=279)
9.88 fps ∼49% +153%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
3.6 fps ∼19%
Wiko View 2 Pro
6.6 fps ∼35% +83%
Honor Play
19 fps ∼100% +428%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3.3 fps ∼17% -8%
LG Q Stylus
2.4 fps ∼13% -33%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
3.6 fps ∼19% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (6 - 58, n=282)
8.89 fps ∼47% +147%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
651 fps ∼100%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
651 fps ∼100% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (0 - 651, n=36)
32.4 fps ∼5% -95%
Vulkan Medium Native (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
606 fps ∼100%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
606 fps ∼100% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (0 - 606, n=34)
28.8 fps ∼5% -95%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
739 fps ∼100%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
739 fps ∼100% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (0 - 739, n=32)
36.1 fps ∼5% -95%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
84332 Points ∼55%
Wiko View 2 Pro
69661 Points ∼46% -17%
Honor Play
152773 Points ∼100% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
70016 Points ∼46% -17%
LG Q Stylus
56626 Points ∼37% -33%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
84332 Points ∼55% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=169)
118333 Points ∼77% +40%
VRMark - Amber Room (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
758 Score ∼43%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
758 Score ∼43% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (0 - 5025, n=39)
1773 Score ∼100% +134%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
739 Points ∼68%
Wiko View 2 Pro
743 Points ∼68% +1%
Honor Play
1091 Points ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
814 Points ∼75% +10%
LG Q Stylus
657 Points ∼60% -11%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
739 Points ∼68% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=498)
698 Points ∼64% -6%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
867 Points ∼39%
Wiko View 2 Pro
975 Points ∼44% +12%
Honor Play
2231 Points ∼100% +157%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
968 Points ∼43% +12%
LG Q Stylus
633 Points ∼28% -27%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
867 Points ∼39% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=498)
1738 Points ∼78% +100%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
1272 Points ∼53%
Wiko View 2 Pro
861 Points ∼36% -32%
Honor Play
2417 Points ∼100% +90%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
914 Points ∼38% -28%
LG Q Stylus
778 Points ∼32% -39%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
1272 Points ∼53% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=498)
1244 Points ∼51% -2%
System (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
2476 Points ∼65%
Wiko View 2 Pro
2894 Points ∼76% +17%
Honor Play
3795 Points ∼100% +53%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
2560 Points ∼67% +3%
LG Q Stylus
1868 Points ∼49% -25%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
2476 Points ∼65% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=498)
2508 Points ∼66% +1%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
1192 Points ∼55%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1159 Points ∼53% -3%
Honor Play
2174 Points ∼100% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1165 Points ∼54% -2%
LG Q Stylus
882 Points ∼41% -26%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
1192 Points ∼55% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=502)
1254 Points ∼58% +5%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordina per valore)
Umidigi Z2
243 Points ∼35%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
243 Points ∼35% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=76)
693 Points ∼100% +185%

Legenda

 
Umidigi Z2 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko View 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor Play HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Media della classe Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=421)
36.7 Points ∼100% +67%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
33.094 Points ∼90% +50%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
22.257 Points ∼61% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
22.191 Points ∼60% +1%
Umidigi Z2 (Chrome 70)
22.014 Points ∼60%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
22 Points ∼60% 0%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
19.174 Points ∼52% -13%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
6692 Points ∼100% +62%
Media della classe Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=556)
5550 Points ∼83% +34%
Umidigi Z2 (Chrome 70)
4132 Points ∼62%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
4132 Points ∼62% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
4032 Points ∼60% -2%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4001 Points ∼60% -3%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
3474 Points ∼52% -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
13202.5 ms * ∼100% -4%
Umidigi Z2 (Chrome 70)
12642 ms * ∼96%
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
12642 ms * ∼96% -0%
Media della classe Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=577)
11486 ms * ∼87% +9%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
11455.8 ms * ∼87% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
11449.6 ms * ∼87% +9%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
6220.7 ms * ∼47% +51%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Umidigi Z2Wiko View 2 ProHonor PlaySamsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018LG Q StylusMedia 64 GB eMMC FlashMedia della classe Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-13%
191%
-5%
-24%
-10%
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
71.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
57.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-19%
71.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
67.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
63.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
54.2 (14.1 - 74.7, n=67)
-24%
45.4 (3.4 - 87.1, n=316)
-36%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
83.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
83.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
73 (21.1 - 86.9, n=67)
-10%
63.7 (8.2 - 96.5, n=316)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
17.61
6.72
-62%
155.5
783%
16.1
-9%
12.07
-31%
19.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=76)
13%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=606)
-9%
Random Read 4KB
53.29
65.63
23%
142.4
167%
72.91
37%
31.45
-41%
49.8 (11.4 - 149, n=76)
-7%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=606)
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB
214.68
194.28
-10%
188.3
-12%
88.48
-59%
121.4
-43%
164 (40 - 246, n=76)
-24%
79.7 (2.99 - 246, n=606)
-63%
Sequential Read 256KB
291.22
265.37
-9%
894.5
207%
298.81
3%
241.7
-17%
270 (115 - 704, n=76)
-7%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=606)
-21%
Carico massimo
 36.1 °C33.2 °C33.8 °C 
 35.7 °C33.2 °C34.3 °C 
 33.5 °C33.1 °C33.4 °C 
Massima: 36.1 °C
Media: 34 °C
32.5 °C32.5 °C34.6 °C
32.7 °C32.6 °C34.7 °C
32.1 °C33.4 °C32.6 °C
Massima: 326 °C
Media: 65.7 °C
Alimentazione (max)  38 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 326 °C / 619 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.430.52535.229.93137.733.5403636.95037.737.76323.327.98021.927.310020.12612518.429.3160193620016.742.425015.541.731519.745.840014.351.450013.854.663012.655.780012.754.9100012.359.1125011.561.516001165.420001169.3250010.867.3315010.770.3400010.674.2500010.775.8630010.771.6800010.966.11000010.962.21250010.957.31600010.840.3SPL63.868.724.181.6N14.420.60.643.9median 11.5median 57.3Delta2.211.335.238.732.938.337.241.431.738.739.638.528.335.227.334.526.933.226.730.62433.320.939.620.944.419.548.718.554.217.558.517.564.215.765.515.865.216.670.415.871.615.469.815.571.7167115.871.51668.416.367.916.369.716.269.616.455.216.455.828.681.51.149.2median 16.4median 65.22.110.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseUmidigi Z2Wiko View 2 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Umidigi Z2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Wiko View 2 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 2 / 2.6 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.6 / 5 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Umidigi Z2
3850 mAh
Wiko View 2 Pro
3000 mAh
Honor Play
3750 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3500 mAh
LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Media Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
 
Media della classe Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
16%
-59%
47%
15%
0%
2%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.64
29%
1.4
-56%
0.62
31%
0.69
23%
0.9
-0%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=634)
2%
Idle Average *
2
2.07
-4%
2.6
-30%
0.96
52%
1.7
15%
2
-0%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=633)
14%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
2.13
18%
4.3
-65%
0.99
62%
1.73
33%
2.6
-0%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=634)
23%
Load Average *
3.6
2.69
25%
6.5
-81%
1.85
49%
3.21
11%
3.6
-0%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=628)
-12%
Load Maximum *
5
4.46
11%
8.2
-64%
3.04
39%
5.31
-6%
5
-0%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=628)
-15%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12ore 20minuti
Umidigi Z2
3850 mAh
Wiko View 2 Pro
3000 mAh
Honor Play
3750 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3500 mAh
LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
WiFi v1.3
740
857
16%
710
-4%
848
15%
419
-43%

Pro

+ nessuna applicazione di terze parti preinstallata
+ design accattivante
+ buona durata della batteria
+ buone prestazioni del sistema

Contro

- no NFC
- tacca molto ampia
- solo USB 2.0
Test dell'Umidigi Z2. Modello di test fornito da Umidigi
Test dell'Umidigi Z2. Modello di test fornito da Umidigi

Nel nostro test, l'Umidigi Z2 si rivela un buon smartphone di fascia media. La grande quantità di memoria di lavoro in combinazione con un sistema Android puro assicura un funzionamento regolare del sistema, e la mancanza di applicazioni preinstallate offre agli utenti la completa libertà di decidere quali applicazioni installare sul proprio smartphone.

L'Umidigi Z2 offre un buon pacchetto completo con un prezzo e prestazioni adeguate.

Per un prezzo relativamente accessibile, gli utenti ricevono uno smartphone solido che mantiene le sue promesse. La fotocamera offre una qualità sufficiente per scatti occasionali e il sensore di impronte digitali sblocca lo smartphone in modo affidabile. Il design e i colori la trasformano in un vero e proprio looker, ma gli utenti possono anche nasconderlo all'interno della cover protettiva inclusa.

Umidigi Z2 - 11/03/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Chassis
84%
Tastiera
67 / 75 → 90%
Dispositivo di puntamento
87%
Connettività
41 / 60 → 68%
Peso
91%
Batteria
95%
Display
81%
Prestazioni di gioco
27 / 63 → 42%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
49 / 70 → 70%
Temperatura
94%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
58 / 91 → 63%
Fotocamera
69%
Media
72%
82%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione dello Smartphone Umidigi Z2
Mike Wobker, 2018-11-21 (Update: 2018-11-21)