Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Honor 8 Pro

Marcus Herbrich (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 05/07/2017

Verso nuovi pascoli. Con l'ultimo Honor 8 Pro, il produttore Cinese Huawei entra nell'arena degli smartphone top. Vediamolo nel nostro test, vediamo la potenza dell'Honor anche in confronto con la forte concorrenza del segmento high-end.

Honor 8 Pro (8 Serie)
Processore
HiSilicon Kirin 960 2.4 GHz
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Memoria
6144 MB 
Schermo
5.7 pollici 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 515 PPI, capacitive, Multi-Touch, LCD, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 52.7 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3,5 Millimeter Klinkenanschluss, Lettore schede: microSD card fino a 128 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: sensore hall, sensore infrarossi, sensore prossimità, sensore luminosità ambientale, bussola, sensore gravità, giroscopio, indicatori di stato, USB OTG, Miracast, Status-LED
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz UMTS: 850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz LTE (FDD): Bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 LTE (TDD): Bands 38, 40, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 6.97 x 157 x 77.5
Batteria
4000 mAh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 12 MPix + 12 MP, autofocus con flash LED
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix lenti con angolazione 77°
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: mono, Tastiera: onscreen, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, alimentatore modulare, cavo USB, cuffie VR (confezione), Emotion UI 5.1 (compatibile con Android 7.0), 24 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola
Peso
184 gr, Alimentazione: 52 gr
Prezzo
549 Euro

 

Size Comparisons

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
368 MBit/s ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
281 MBit/s ∼76% +19%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼70% +9%
HTC U Play
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
249 MBit/s ∼68% +6%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
236 MBit/s ∼64%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
48.8 MBit/s ∼13% -79%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
656 MBit/s ∼100% +182%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
335 MBit/s ∼51% +44%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼48% +34%
HTC U Play
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
260 MBit/s ∼40% +12%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
233 MBit/s ∼36%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
154 MBit/s ∼23% -34%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
GPS Honor 8 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge picture taken at night
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge picture taken at night
Honor 8 Pro picture taken at night
Honor 8 Pro picture taken at night

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
502
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 541 cd/m² Media: 513.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.49 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 91 %
Al centro con la batteria: 541 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1803:1 (Nero: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.27
Honor 8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
HTC U Play
Super LCD, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
-22%
-33%
-15%
-8%
28%
30%
-54%
16%
Brightness
514
556
8%
366
-29%
432
-16%
434
-16%
552
7%
562
9%
430
-16%
490
-5%
Brightness Distribution
91
86
-5%
87
-4%
90
-1%
93
2%
96
5%
93
2%
84
-8%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.3
0.43
-43%
0.25
17%
0.36
-20%
Contrast
1803
1272
-29%
1696
-6%
1236
-31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.2
4.8
-50%
5.1
-59%
5.7
-78%
2.8
12%
1.59
50%
1.7
47%
7.1
-122%
2.1
34%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
4.5
-13%
5.5
-38%
4.1
-3%
3.7
7%
2.01
50%
1.6
60%
6.8
-70%
2.6
35%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.39 100%
2.24 107%
2.32 103%
2.31 104%
2.01 119%
2.13 113%
2.23 108%
2.23 108%
CCT
7120 91%
7194 90%
7388 88%
7359 88%
7164 91%
6321 103%
6435 101%
7866 83%
6843 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
81.57
88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98
99.87
100

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 2255 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms Incremento
↘ 14 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.2 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30.8 ms Incremento
↘ 22 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (44 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
146044 Points ∼79%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼76% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points ∼53% -33%
HTC U Play
51628 Points ∼28% -65%
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼72% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼70% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼90% +13%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼87% +9%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼70% -12%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P10
6036 Points ∼23%
HTC U Play
2825 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6375 Points ∼24%
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Huawei P10
1935 Points ∼35%
HTC U Play
775 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1952 Points ∼36%
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼34%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼27%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
6245 Points ∼57%
HTC 10
4021 Points ∼36% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼61% +7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
1853 Points ∼42%
HTC 10
1654 Points ∼37% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼45% +9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
2216 Points ∼87%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼75% -14%
Huawei P9 Plus
2547 Points ∼100% +15%
HTC U Play
1498 Points ∼59% -32%
HTC 10
1688 Points ∼66% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼83% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼97% +11%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼68% -22%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points ∼70% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
1746 Points ∼32%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% +38%
Huawei P9 Plus
807 Points ∼15% -54%
HTC U Play
349 Points ∼6% -80%
HTC 10
2889 Points ∼54% +65%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼41% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% +99%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼45% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points ∼43% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
1832 Points ∼47%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼59% +24%
Huawei P9 Plus
952 Points ∼25% -48%
HTC U Play
421 Points ∼11% -77%
HTC 10
2495 Points ∼64% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼57% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼82% +74%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼57% +21%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼56% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
1896 Points ∼73%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼85% +16%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points ∼90% +23%
HTC U Play
1516 Points ∼59% -20%
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼58% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼77% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼95% +30%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼56% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼71% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
1856 Points ∼24%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼36% +52%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points ∼13% -44%
HTC U Play
565 Points ∼7% -70%
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼59% +147%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39% +62%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼62% +158%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼43% +78%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼48% +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
1865 Points ∼38%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼54% +42%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points ∼24% -36%
HTC U Play
657 Points ∼13% -65%
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼65% +69%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼56% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼81% +112%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼53% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼62% +62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
15129 Points ∼22%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼22% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points ∼22% +1%
HTC U Play
9970 Points ∼14% -34%
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼29% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼28% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼30% +38%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼32% +48%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼30% +38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
32243 Points ∼7%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% +12%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points ∼5% -32%
HTC U Play
11713 Points ∼3% -64%
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼7% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼7% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% +3%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼8% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼6% -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
25766 Points ∼13%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼14% +7%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points ∼10% -23%
HTC U Play
11275 Points ∼6% -56%
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼14% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼15% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼15% +14%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼16% +20%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼13% -2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
43 fps ∼3%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼5% +60%
Huawei P9 Plus
41 fps ∼3% -5%
HTC U Play
18 fps ∼1% -58%
HTC 10
73 fps ∼6% +70%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼6% +88%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% +142%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼7% +112%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% +79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
59 fps ∼5%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼5% -7%
Huawei P9 Plus
43 fps ∼4% -27%
HTC U Play
18 fps ∼2% -69%
HTC 10
43 fps ∼4% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼5% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼5% -2%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼5% -10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
29 fps ∼5%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼6% +3%
Huawei P9 Plus
18 fps ∼3% -38%
HTC U Play
7.1 fps ∼1% -76%
HTC 10
39 fps ∼7% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% +72%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼8% +59%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8% +41%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
20 fps ∼3%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼6% +60%
Huawei P9 Plus
19 fps ∼3% -5%
HTC U Play
7 fps ∼1% -65%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼4% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼5% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼7% +90%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼8% +125%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼5% +30%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
21 fps ∼5%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼6% +14%
Huawei P9 Plus
10 fps ∼2% -52%
HTC U Play
4.8 fps ∼1% -77%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼6% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼7% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% +100%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼8% +52%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% +29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
13 fps ∼3%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼6% +92%
Huawei P9 Plus
11 fps ∼3% -15%
HTC U Play
4.8 fps ∼1% -63%
HTC 10
14 fps ∼3% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼4% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼6% +77%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼8% +146%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼4% +15%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
15 fps ∼4%
Huawei P10
15 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.2 fps ∼2% -59%
HTC U Play
2.5 fps ∼1% -83%
HTC 10
18 fps ∼5% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼4% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼7% +67%
OnePlus 3T
20 fps ∼6% +33%
Lenovo Moto Z
16 fps ∼5% +7%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
11 fps ∼0%
Huawei P10
16 fps ∼0% +45%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.8 fps ∼0% -38%
HTC U Play
2.5 fps ∼0% -77%
HTC 10
10 fps ∼0% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps ∼0% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼0% +18%
OnePlus 3T
20 fps ∼1% +82%
Lenovo Moto Z
9.8 fps ∼0% -11%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
7356 Points ∼91%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼90% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points ∼88% -3%
HTC U Play
3356 Points ∼41% -54%
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼71% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼57% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼72% -21%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼70% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼94% +4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
1131 Points ∼73%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼70% -5%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points ∼68% -7%
HTC U Play
10 Points ∼1% -99%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼60% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼64% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼75% +3%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼58% -21%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼62% -15%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
4070 Points ∼47%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼48% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points ∼18% -63%
HTC U Play
666 Points ∼8% -84%
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼58% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼26% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼71% +51%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼52% +9%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼50% +6%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
4277 Points ∼100%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points ∼62% -38%
HTC U Play
996 Points ∼23% -77%
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼73% -27%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼46% -54%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼51% -49%
System (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
4029 Points ∼61%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼58% -5%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points ∼60% -2%
HTC U Play
2173 Points ∼33% -46%
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼43% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼62% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼81% +32%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼48% -22%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼52% -16%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Honor 8 Pro
2985 Points ∼90%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼79% -12%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points ∼61% -32%
HTC U Play
344 Points ∼10% -88%
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼66% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼63% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼67% -26%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼71% -21%

Legenda

 
Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U Play Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
13191 Points ∼94% +32%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
12058 Points ∼86% +20%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
10236 Points ∼73% +2%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
10016 Points ∼71%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
9798 Points ∼70% -2%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
8905 Points ∼63% -11%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
7771 Points ∼55% -22%
HTC U Play (Chrome 56)
3163 Points ∼23% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HTC U Play (Chrome 56)
9981.6 ms * ∼100% -216%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
3156.7 ms * ∼32%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
3154.7 ms * ∼32% -0%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
3146.3 ms * ∼32% -0%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
3128.7 ms * ∼31% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
2792.3 ms * ∼28% +12%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
2719.3 ms * ∼27% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
2564.1 ms * ∼26% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼22% +29%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
75.12 Points ∼100% +29%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
70 Points ∼93% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼83% +7%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
58.065 Points ∼77%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
57.9 Points ∼77% 0%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
54.526 Points ∼73% -6%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
52.1 Points ∼69% -10%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
47.5 Points ∼63% -18%
HTC U Play (Chrome 56)
22.318 Points ∼30% -62%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
163 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼94% +9%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
141 Points ∼87%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
136 Points ∼83% -4%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
135 Points ∼83% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
130 Points ∼80% -8%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
112 Points ∼69% -21%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
108 Points ∼66% -23%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei P9 Plus
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 64 GB eMMC Flash
HTC U Play
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
0%
-39%
-51%
-19%
-16%
1%
-33%
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
32.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
32.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
0%
24.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-22%
23.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-27%
65.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
103%
50.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
57%
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
78%
45.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
42%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
54.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
54.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
0%
62.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
15%
36.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-32%
83.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
54%
76.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
41%
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
31%
78.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45%
Random Write 4KB
151.6
152.31
0%
51.23
-66%
52.7
-65%
15.89
-90%
15.79
-90%
15.27
-90%
74.39
-51%
74.93
-51%
Random Read 4KB
166.4
168.42
1%
39.33
-76%
32
-81%
29.92
-82%
86.71
-48%
127.18
-24%
123.57
-26%
117.15
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB
187.1
189.83
1%
140.38
-25%
135.5
-28%
115.56
-38%
145.11
-22%
194.18
4%
165.3
-12%
168.32
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB
737.8
737.65
0%
284.27
-61%
197.3
-73%
275.09
-63%
487.34
-34%
787.6
7%
436.43
-41%
439.66
-40%
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high30 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Carico massimo
 43 °C41.6 °C39.9 °C 
 41.9 °C39.8 °C44.8 °C 
 40.6 °C40.2 °C42 °C 
Massima: 44.8 °C
Media: 41.5 °C
37.5 °C39.2 °C40.9 °C
37.6 °C38 °C41.2 °C
37.4 °C39 °C39.7 °C
Massima: 41.2 °C
Media: 38.9 °C
Alimentazione (max)  31.5 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.637.82525.432.83125.330.74032.924.95033.634.26331.633.78028.4311002728.112520.831.8160222820021.33925020.852.631521.261.240019.468.650019.570.863017.769.280017.968.1100017.865.1125017.365.5160017.470200016.772.8250017.274.3315018.270.2400017.974.5500017.670.6630017.766.7800017.861.11000017.961.21250018.154.21600018.242.6SPL3082.4N1.352.7median 17.9Honor 8 Promedian 65.5Delta1.31131.639.925.439.825.339.732.934.733.634.731.632.728.427.82726.420.828.62241.521.350.520.855.921.260.319.46519.568.617.766.817.964.417.866.917.371.517.473.516.774.517.273.718.272.217.970.517.670.717.764.817.860.417.95918.148.418.232.83082.71.352.3median 17.9Huawei P10median 64.81.310.626.128.726.12625.22625.42725.425.829.325.825.226.125.223.123.823.133.430.833.436.13336.135.428.935.434.724.734.743.324.943.349.71949.753.319.153.356.520.456.559.318.159.363.617.563.664.71764.768.815.968.869.114.569.170.713.770.772.614.372.675.813.475.874.213.674.275.513.375.574.312.974.371.812.771.871.81371.872.212.772.266.61366.65512.75584.427.584.456.9156.9median 66.6OnePlus 3Tmedian 14.5median 66.69.83.69.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Honor 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.24 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.98 / 2.27 / 2.36 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 6.58 / 10.12 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
HTC U Play
2500 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Power Consumption
8%
35%
23%
15%
33%
42%
15%
40%
Idle Minimum *
0.98
0.83
15%
0.87
11%
0.92
6%
0.68
31%
0.63
36%
0.68
31%
0.61
38%
0.66
33%
Idle Average *
2.27
2.1
7%
1.2
47%
1.84
19%
1.49
34%
1.1
52%
1.13
50%
1.77
22%
1.01
56%
Idle Maximum *
2.36
2.18
8%
1.27
46%
2
15%
1.91
19%
1.56
34%
1.16
51%
1.81
23%
1.09
54%
Load Average *
6.58
6.57
-0%
4.69
29%
4.3
35%
7.4
-12%
5.95
10%
4.69
29%
6.67
-1%
3.97
40%
Load Maximum *
10.12
9.32
8%
5.63
44%
6.2
39%
9.71
4%
6.7
34%
5.24
48%
10.98
-8%
8.34
18%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
22ore 58minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
9ore 33minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11ore 15minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
3ore 01minuti
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
HTC U Play
2500 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
26%
16%
14%
-6%
-7%
26%
16%
14%
Reader / Idle
1378
1538
12%
1540
12%
1446
5%
1302
-6%
1273
-8%
1565
14%
1423
3%
1371
-1%
Load
181
219
21%
176
-3%
263
45%
223
23%
203
12%
275
52%
282
56%
320
77%
WiFi v1.3
573
758
32%
966
69%
530
-8%
473
-17%
413
-28%
736
28%
494
-14%
407
-29%
H.264
675
947
40%
582
-14%
776
15%
514
-24%
648
-4%
742
10%
810
20%
724
7%

Pro

+ pannello IPS luminoso e con contrasto elevato
+ risoluzione QHD
+ performance
+ 6 GB di RAM
+ veloce archiviazione da 64 GB UFS-2.1
+ dual-SIM
+ display con colori precisi
+ buone dual-camera ...

Contro

- ... ma non livello high-end
- si scalda molto
- manca il Bluetooth 5.0
- lento trasferimento WLAN
- solo USB 2.0
- modulo GPS medio

L'Honor 8 Pro è uno smartphone carino e ben costruito di fascia high-end con eccellenti prestazioni di sistema. Rispetto agli attuali dispositivi e a quelli dello scorso anno, abbiamo qualcosa in meno, nonostente la consistente memoria da 6 GB. 

Nell'Honor 8 Pro, non vediamo (ancora) il buon rapporto prezzo-prestazioni classico dei dispositivi Honor. Gli smartphones dello scorso anno high-end (come il Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge) a volte offrono un pacchetto complessivamente migliore ad un costo minore, considerando che si tratta di dispositivi che hanno subito un evidente calo di prezzo.

Le features come Bluetooth 4.2 invece del 5.0, la scheda grafica relativamente debole, la fotocamera frontale senza auto-focus, e la USB-2.0 differenziano l'Honor 8 Pro dagli attuali smartphones top di altri produttori. In aggiunta, la batteria non ha ricarica wireless, e il dispositivo non ha certificazioni IP e quindi non è protetto da polvere ed acqua. Le estremità del case sono un po' larghe ed il formato del display è relativamente inefficiente, almeno per un dispositivo del 2017.   

Nel complesso, l'Honor 8 Pro è uno smartphone di successo e raccomandabile come alternativa ai dispositivi Huawei P10. Ma a nostro parere non riesce ad arrivare all'olimpo degli smartphones del 2017. 

Indipendentemente da questo, le politiche di Huawei di rimuovere componenti hardware lasciano l'amaro in bocca - è discutibile se gli acquirenti dell'Honor-8-Pro saranno contenti di uno spazio di archiviazione UFS-2.1.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

In the test: Honor 8 Pro. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.
In the test: Honor 8 Pro. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

The Honor 8 Pro is an optically very successful and well-built high-end smartphone with an excellent system performance. Compared to the current and some of last-year's crop of high-end devices, we have to make do with less in many places, despite its amply-sized 6 GB working memory. 

In the Honor 8 Pro, we do not (yet) see the excellent price-performance ratio Honor devices are known for. Last year's high-end smartphones (such as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge) sometimes offer a better package overall for less money, considering that those devices are already past their biggest drop in price.

Features such as Bluetooth 4.2 instead of 5.0, the comparatively "weak" graphics unit, a front camera without auto-focus, and the USB-2.0 standard differentiate the Honor 8 Pro from the current flagship smartphones of other manufacturers. In addition, neither can the battery be charged wirelessly, nor is the device certified according to the IP standard and thereby protected against dust and water. The casing edges are slightly large and the ratio of the display size to the whole front is relatively inefficient, at least for a device of the year 2017.   

All in all, the Honor 8 Pro is a very successful smartphone and a recommendable alternative to the Huawei P10 devices. But in our opinion it is not an attack on the 2017-smartphone Olympus. 

Regardless of that, Huawei's policies of removing hardware components leave a bad taste – whether all the Honor-8-Pro buyers will feel the joy of the modern UFS-2.1 storage is at least questionable.

Honor 8 Pro - 05/04/2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
89%
Tastiera
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositivo di puntamento
93%
Connettività
49 / 60 → 81%
Peso
89%
Batteria
92%
Display
87%
Prestazioni di gioco
55 / 63 → 87%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
69 / 70 → 98%
Temperatura
85%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Fotocamera
74%
Media
78%
87%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Honor 8 Pro
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-05- 7 (Update: 2017-05- 7)