Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile Cube Thinker (Core m3-7Y30, 8 GB, 256 GB)

Portatile Surface conveniente. I portatili orientali migliorano sempre di più, anche come aspetto e features. Un rappresentate della classe premium cinese è il Cube Thinker, che ha un case elegante in alluminio e uno schermo Surface-Book. Tuttavia, le prestazioni reggono il confronto con la concorrenza?

Cube Thinker m3
Processore
Scheda grafica
Memoria
8192 MB 
Schermo
13.5 pollici 3:2, 3000x2000 pixel 267 PPI, 5 touchpoints, supporto penna nativo, Panasonic MEI96A2, IPS, lucido: si
Scheda madre
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Harddisk
,  GB 
, 256 GB SATA SSD (no-name brand), 210 GB libera
Scheda audio
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Porte di connessione
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 DisplayPort, Connessioni Audio: cuffie, 1 Lettore impronte digitali
Rete
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 14 x 313 x 237
Batteria
50 Wh polimeri di litio, SR Real battery, Autonomia della batteria (dichiarata dal produttore): 10 ore
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.0 MP
Fotocamera Principale: 2 MPix
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: dual channel, Tastiera: chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: no, alimentatore, adattatore europeo, senza ventola
Peso
1.671 kg, Alimentazione: 218 gr
Prezzo
525 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Broadcom 802.11ac
660 MBit/s ∼100% +119%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
534 MBit/s ∼81% +77%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
302 MBit/s ∼46%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
208 MBit/s ∼32% -31%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Broadcom 802.11ac
689 MBit/s ∼100% +104%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
556 MBit/s ∼81% +65%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
337 MBit/s ∼49%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
142 MBit/s ∼21% -58%
526
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 526 cd/m² Media: 461.2 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 81 %
Al centro con la batteria: 448 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1723:1 (Nero: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.53 | - Ø
70% sRGB (Argyll) 44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.46
Cube Thinker m3
Panasonic MEI96A2, , 3000x2000, 13.5
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
3000x2000, 13.5
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
AU Optronics AUO106D B125HANO1.0, , 1920x1080, 12.5
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
AUO B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
20%
54%
31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
65 (31, 34)
48.4 (19.6, 28.8)
26%
28 (9, 19)
57%
29 (15, 14)
55%
Response Time Black / White *
38 (21, 17)
32.8 (7.6, 25.2)
14%
19 (5, 14)
50%
22 (5, 17)
42%
PWM Frequency
200 (75)
192 (30)
-4%
Screen
17%
-24%
-33%
Brightness
461
410
-11%
364
-21%
298
-35%
Brightness Distribution
81
93
15%
88
9%
90
11%
Black Level *
0.26
0.254
2%
0.32
-23%
0.21
19%
Contrast
1723
1696
-2%
1184
-31%
1438
-17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.06
38%
4.78
-45%
6.33
-92%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.53
2.22
12%
4.27
-69%
8.13
-221%
Gamma
2.46 98%
2.13 113%
2.34 103%
2.52 95%
CCT
6563 99%
6520 100%
7376 88%
6811 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
44
64
45%
42
-5%
60
36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
70
96
37%
65
-7%
93
33%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
19% / 18%
15% / -9%
-1% / -16%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms Incremento
↘ 17 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.8 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31 ms Incremento
↘ 34 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz
75 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 75 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5885 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Intel Core i5-6300U
122 Points ∼100% +18%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
103 Points ∼84%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
85 Points ∼70% -17%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
78 Points ∼64% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Intel Core i5-6300U
305 Points ∼100% +35%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
226 Points ∼74%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
209 Points ∼69% -8%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
208 Points ∼68% -8%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
3699 Points ∼100% +1%
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
3656 Points ∼99%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
3644 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
3496 Points ∼95% -4%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
2881 Points ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
2814 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
2767 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
2727 Points ∼95% -5%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
26021 Points ∼100%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
21128 Points ∼81% -19%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
19348 Points ∼74% -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
1704 ms * ∼100% -21%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1623.7 ms * ∼95% -15%
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
1414.1 ms * ∼83%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
174.42 Points ∼100%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
143.85 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
111.11 Points ∼64% -36%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2881 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3801 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3656 punti
Aiuto
Cube Thinker m3
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Lite-On CV1-8B128
AS SSD
86%
-44%
-5%
Access Time Write *
0.179
0.037
79%
0.183
-2%
0.073
59%
Access Time Read *
0.128
0.049
62%
0.166
-30%
0.109
15%
4K-64 Write
290.24
281.41
-3%
21.55
-93%
105.75
-64%
4K-64 Read
324.57
1409.22
334%
82.88
-74%
295.1
-9%
4K Write
55.01
84.96
54%
27.49
-50%
57.01
4%
4K Read
26.4
34.31
30%
15.9
-40%
28.29
7%
Seq Write
362.84
275.22
-24%
130.26
-64%
175.65
-52%
Seq Read
483.68
1223
153%
480.88
-1%
486.25
1%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sequential Read: 483.68 MB/s
Sequential Write: 362.84 MB/s
4K Read: 26.4 MB/s
4K Write: 55.01 MB/s
4K-64 Read: 324.57 MB/s
4K-64 Write: 290.24 MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.128 ms
Access Time Write: 0.179 ms
Score Read: 399 Points
Score Write: 382 Points
Score Total: 988 Points
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
2031 Points ∼100% +168%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
789 Points ∼39% +4%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
757 Points ∼37%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
11340 Points ∼100% +92%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6539 Points ∼58% +11%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
5911 Points ∼52%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
5510 Points ∼49% -7%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
5076 Points ∼45% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
43637 Points ∼100% +31%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
38293 Points ∼88% +15%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
33229 Points ∼76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
123411 Points ∼100% +69%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
76530 Points ∼62% +4%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
73237 Points ∼59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
82606 Points ∼100% +43%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
65549 Points ∼79% +13%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
57778 Points ∼70%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
35640 Points ∼100% +20%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
29788 Points ∼84%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
21421 Points ∼60% -28%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
33260 Points ∼100% +14%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
29224 Points ∼88%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
15597 Points ∼47% -47%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
33761 Points ∼100% +15%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
29347 Points ∼87%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
16599 Points ∼49% -43%
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4571 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
682 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
317 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score
180 punti
Aiuto
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
94.2 fps ∼100% +200%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
38.9 fps ∼41% +24%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
36.4 fps ∼39% +16%
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
31.45 fps ∼33%
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 31.4517.6414.154.57fps

Rumorosità

Idle
30.6 / 30.6 / 31.6 dB(A)
Sotto carico
30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.329.435.63529.3252928.733.328.2293129.129.43225.429.14030.526.632.329.830.55033.632.634.428.533.66332.132.432.428.932.18031.32930.129.131.310028.92729.428.928.912527.724.725.928.427.716026.824.626.22726.82002626.12623.82625023.32224.122.723.33152323.62421.92340021.9212220.921.95002121.421.920.52163020.720.121.519.520.780019.819.820.418.419.8100018.818.720.118.218.8125018.817.819.717.818.8160018.51819.11818.5200018.117.618.717.818.1250017.717.418.617.817.7315017.317.518.817.917.3400017.117.218.517.917.1500016.917.718.21816.963001717.618.31817800016.917.418.317.916.91000016.917.518.617.816.91250016.917.818.517.716.91600017.319.41917.817.3SPL30.830.731.730.730.8N1.51.51.71.51.5median 18.8Cube Thinker m3median 18.7median 19.7median 18median 18.8Delta2.92.42.42.12.9hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carico massimo
 40.7 °C32.2 °C28.3 °C 
 40.8 °C32.8 °C28.2 °C 
 36 °C30.1 °C28.1 °C 
Massima: 40.8 °C
Media: 33 °C
29.6 °C33.9 °C40.5 °C
29.3 °C32.8 °C41 °C
28.6 °C31.8 °C35.2 °C
Massima: 41 °C
Media: 33.6 °C
Alimentazione (max)  37.3 °C | Temperatura della stanza 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.93544.92539.328.239.33134.925.434.94037.129.837.1503928.5396338.728.938.7803529.13510037.928.937.912537.928.437.916038273820038.323.838.325040.122.740.131544.121.944.140047.220.947.250051.720.551.763057.319.557.380060.318.460.3100064.318.264.3125057.917.857.9160055.21855.2200062.717.862.7250058.317.858.3315062.917.962.9400063.717.963.7500062.31862.3630056.11856.1800048.817.948.81000043.717.843.71250045.617.745.61600051.517.851.5SPL72.330.772.3N27.81.527.8median 51.7Cube Thinker m3median 18median 51.7Delta8.32.18.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Cube Thinker m3 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.33 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.5 / 10.3 / 11.5 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 23.3 / 21.1 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Cube Thinker m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, , IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS with 72% NTSC, 1920x1080, 13.3
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12
Power Consumption
23%
23%
32%
Idle Minimum *
4.5
3.7
18%
3.4
24%
2.7
40%
Idle Average *
10.3
7.4
28%
7
32%
2.7
74%
Idle Maximum *
11.5
8.2
29%
7.6
34%
7.2
37%
Load Average *
23.3
17
27%
19
18%
22
6%
Load Maximum *
21.1
18.6
12%
20.1
5%
20.5
3%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
10ore 10minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3
4ore 13minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
2ore 12minuti
Cube Thinker m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 50 Wh
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
6300U, Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 78 Wh
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 54 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
50%
156%
67%
Reader / Idle
610
1070
75%
1072
76%
1027
68%
WiFi v1.3
253
402
59%
805
218%
386
53%
Load
132
153
16%
362
174%
239
81%
H.264
604
696

Pro

+ display high-resolution luminoso
+ design elegante
+ case robusto in alluminio
+ fanless
+ manutenzione facile
+ touchpad grande
+ sensore impronte
+ buone dotazioni archiviazione
+ connessioni sufficienti
+ economico
+ USB-C

Contro

- garanzia
- schermo
- tastiera
- autonomia
- abbastanza pesante
Test: Cube Thinker
Test: Cube Thinker

Il Cube Thinker è un classico portatile cinese: luci e ombre. Il design è intaccato dallo schermo che ha qualche problema, e la tastiera con i tasti di altezze diverse. L'autonomia è limitate e le buone prestazioni non possono essere sfruttate a lungo. Il rumore durante la ricarica può dare fastidio. 

Di positivo, c'è il display per il prezzo, il case robusto, le prestazioni buone e non dimenticate: prezzo imbattibile. I compromessi e l'assenza di garanzia devono essere considerati prima dell'acquisto. 

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Cube Thinker m3 - 06/29/2017 v6
Florian Schaar

Chassis
79 /  98 → 81%
Tastiera
73%
Dispositivo di puntamento
83%
Connettività
48 / 80 → 60%
Peso
67 / 78 → 74%
Batteria
76%
Display
91%
Prestazioni di gioco
53 / 68 → 78%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
70 / 87 → 80%
Temperatura
91 / 91 → 100%
Rumorosità
94%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Fotocamera
42 / 85 → 49%
Media
73%
80%
Subnotebook - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile Cube Thinker (Core m3-7Y30, 8 GB, 256 GB)
Florian Schaar, 2017-07-18 (Update: 2017-07-18)