Notebookcheck

Recensione dello Smartphone Oukitel WP2

Florian Schaar, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 11/26/2018

Un power bank con un display. L'Oukitel WP2 combina i due aspetti preferiti degli smartphone cinesi: un aspetto robusto e batterie enormi. Ma anche il resto delle dotazioni può tenere il passo?

Oukitel WP2 (WP Serie)
Processore
Mediatek MT6750T
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memoria
4096 MB 
Schermo
6 pollici 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, touchscreen 10 punti, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 57 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: USB-C/audio, Lettore schede: microSD, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: sensore di prossimità, sensore di accelerazione, giroscopio
Rete
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G: 850/900/1800/1900, 3G: 900/2100, 4G: band 1/3/7/8/20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 15 x 176 x 84
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 16.3 MPix fotocamera principale
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8.3 MPix fotocamera frontale
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: 1, Tastiera: on-screen, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Strumento SIM, cavo OTG, adattatore per cavo audio USB-C-to-3.5-mm-audio, 12 Mesi Garanzia, senza ventola, gommato
Peso
364 gr, Alimentazione: 85 gr
Prezzo
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Confronto dimensioni

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Media della classe Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=302)
210 MBit/s ∼100% +143%
Crosscall Action-X3
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
199 MBit/s ∼95% +130%
Doogee S55
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
105 MBit/s ∼50% +22%
Oukitel K7
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼49% +19%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼48% +17%
Oukitel WP2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
86.4 (min: 43, max: 107) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Media della classe Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=302)
205 MBit/s ∼100% +101%
Crosscall Action-X3
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
201 MBit/s ∼98% +97%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼53% +7%
Doogee S55
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
107 MBit/s ∼52% +5%
Oukitel WP2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 42, max: 118) MBit/s ∼50%
Oukitel K7
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.8 MBit/s ∼47% -5%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Oukitel WP2 Mediatek MT6750T, ARM Mali-T860 MP2; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø86 (43-107)
Oukitel WP2 Mediatek MT6750T, ARM Mali-T860 MP2; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø102 (42-118)
Test in strada Oukitel WP2
Test in strada Oukitel WP2
Test in strada Oukitel WP2
Test in strada Oukitel WP2
Test in strada Oukitel WP2
Test in strada Oukitel WP2
Test in strada Garmin Edge 500
Test in strada Garmin Edge 500
Test in strada Garmin Edge 500
Test in strada Garmin Edge 500
Test in strada Garmin Edge 500
Test in strada Garmin Edge 500
Fotocamera principale
Fotocamera principale
Fotocamera principale auto-focus
Fotocamera principale auto-focus
Fotocamera principale focus manuale
Fotocamera frontale

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
Grefico di Test
Grefico di Test
Dettaglio
Dettaglio
Confronto Colore
Confronto Colore
touch 10 punti
touch 10 punti
460
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 482 cd/m² Media: 455.9 cd/m² Minimum: 18.01 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 86 %
Al centro con la batteria: 472 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1475:1 (Nero: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.1 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 9.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.75
Oukitel WP2
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Crosscall Action-X3
IPS, 1280x800, 5
Doogee S55
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Oukitel K7
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Blackview P10000 Pro
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
10%
-15%
12%
-1%
Brightness middle
472
417
-12%
573
21%
475
1%
513
9%
Brightness
456
425
-7%
568
25%
456
0%
507
11%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
85
-1%
83
-3%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.32
0.29
9%
0.91
-184%
0.24
25%
0.37
-16%
Contrast
1475
1438
-3%
630
-57%
1979
34%
1386
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.1
7.12
22%
6.96
24%
7.5
18%
8.5
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
14.8
10.19
31%
12.14
18%
14.2
4%
15.2
-3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.6
6.1
36%
6.3
34%
7.7
20%
10.6
-10%
Gamma
1.75 126%
2.687 82%
1.87 118%
2.26 97%
2.29 96%
CCT
8713 75%
7687 85%
7606 85%
8731 74%
10204 64%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8964 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
32 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 14 ms Incremento
↘ 18 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 82 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25.6 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
56 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 26 ms Incremento
↘ 30 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 92 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
1759 Points ∼39%
Crosscall Action-X3
2045 Points ∼45% +16%
Doogee S55
1888 Points ∼42% +7%
Oukitel K7
1924 Points ∼43% +9%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
1759 Points ∼39% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=196)
4525 Points ∼100% +157%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
2633 Points ∼61%
Crosscall Action-X3
2360 Points ∼55% -10%
Doogee S55
2765 Points ∼64% +5%
Oukitel K7
2566 Points ∼60% -3%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
2633 Points ∼61% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=246)
4306 Points ∼100% +64%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
643 Points ∼51%
Crosscall Action-X3
634 Points ∼50% -1%
Doogee S55
682 Points ∼54% +6%
Oukitel K7
664 Points ∼52% +3%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
643 Points ∼51% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=247)
1269 Points ∼100% +97%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
3042 Points ∼60%
Crosscall Action-X3
3666 Points ∼73% +21%
Doogee S55
3257 Points ∼64% +7%
Oukitel K7
Points ∼0% -100%
Blackview P10000 Pro
5054 Points ∼100% +66%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
3042 Points ∼60% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=254)
4550 Points ∼90% +50%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
4012 Points ∼59%
Crosscall Action-X3
4665 Points ∼68% +16%
Doogee S55
4190 Points ∼61% +4%
Oukitel K7
Points ∼0% -100%
Blackview P10000 Pro
6846 Points ∼100% +71%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
4012 Points ∼59% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=422)
4954 Points ∼72% +23%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
920 Points ∼54%
Crosscall Action-X3
1131 Points ∼66% +23%
Doogee S55
1037 Points ∼61% +13%
Oukitel K7
1035 Points ∼61% +13%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1123 Points ∼66% +22%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
920 Points ∼54% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2386 - 4439, n=276)
1707 Points ∼100% +86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
343 Points ∼23%
Crosscall Action-X3
277 Points ∼19% -19%
Doogee S55
344 Points ∼23% 0%
Oukitel K7
326 Points ∼22% -5%
Blackview P10000 Pro
407 Points ∼28% +19%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
343 Points ∼23% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=276)
1467 Points ∼100% +328%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
399 Points ∼29%
Crosscall Action-X3
333 Points ∼24% -17%
Doogee S55
404 Points ∼30% +1%
Oukitel K7
385 Points ∼28% -4%
Blackview P10000 Pro
473 Points ∼35% +19%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
399 Points ∼29% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (1012 - 5189, n=279)
1361 Points ∼100% +241%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
1072 Points ∼64%
Crosscall Action-X3
1148 Points ∼68% +7%
Doogee S55
1033 Points ∼61% -4%
Oukitel K7
1014 Points ∼60% -5%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1160 Points ∼69% +8%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
1072 Points ∼64% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=291)
1687 Points ∼100% +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
491 Points ∼24%
Crosscall Action-X3
478 Points ∼23% -3%
Doogee S55
497 Points ∼24% +1%
Oukitel K7
497 Points ∼24% +1%
Blackview P10000 Pro
617 Points ∼30% +26%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
491 Points ∼24% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=291)
2071 Points ∼100% +322%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
558 Points ∼32%
Crosscall Action-X3
549 Points ∼32% -2%
Doogee S55
562 Points ∼32% +1%
Oukitel K7
561 Points ∼32% +1%
Blackview P10000 Pro
688 Points ∼40% +23%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
558 Points ∼32% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=292)
1734 Points ∼100% +211%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
1054 Points ∼64%
Crosscall Action-X3
1098 Points ∼67% +4%
Doogee S55
1124 Points ∼69% +7%
Oukitel K7
1113 Points ∼68% +6%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1469 Points ∼90% +39%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
1054 Points ∼64% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=351)
1640 Points ∼100% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
149 Points ∼13%
Crosscall Action-X3
234 Points ∼20% +57%
Doogee S55
199 Points ∼17% +34%
Oukitel K7
90 Points ∼8% -40%
Blackview P10000 Pro
53 Points ∼4% -64%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
149 Points ∼13% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=351)
1187 Points ∼100% +697%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
184 Points ∼16%
Crosscall Action-X3
284 Points ∼25% +54%
Doogee S55
244 Points ∼22% +33%
Oukitel K7
113 Points ∼10% -39%
Blackview P10000 Pro
68 Points ∼6% -63%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
184 Points ∼16% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=359)
1134 Points ∼100% +516%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
1126 Points ∼73%
Crosscall Action-X3
1099 Points ∼71% -2%
Doogee S55
1110 Points ∼72% -1%
Oukitel K7
1054 Points ∼69% -6%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1456 Points ∼95% +29%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
1126 Points ∼73% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=383)
1538 Points ∼100% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
98 Points ∼6%
Crosscall Action-X3
492 Points ∼30% +402%
Doogee S55
127 Points ∼8% +30%
Oukitel K7
109 Points ∼7% +11%
Blackview P10000 Pro
55 Points ∼3% -44%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
98 Points ∼6% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=383)
1632 Points ∼100% +1565%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
123 Points ∼9%
Crosscall Action-X3
561 Points ∼40% +356%
Doogee S55
158 Points ∼11% +28%
Oukitel K7
136 Points ∼10% +11%
Blackview P10000 Pro
71 Points ∼5% -42%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
123 Points ∼9% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=391)
1387 Points ∼100% +1028%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
8284 Points ∼64%
Crosscall Action-X3
8864 Points ∼69% +7%
Doogee S55
9934 Points ∼77% +20%
Oukitel K7
Points ∼0% -100%
Blackview P10000 Pro
7733 Points ∼60% -7%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
8284 Points ∼64% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=538)
12873 Points ∼100% +55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
8830 Points ∼49%
Crosscall Action-X3
9342 Points ∼52% +6%
Doogee S55
9476 Points ∼53% +7%
Oukitel K7
Points ∼0% -100%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10997 Points ∼61% +25%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
8830 Points ∼49% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=538)
17989 Points ∼100% +104%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
8703 Points ∼58%
Crosscall Action-X3
9231 Points ∼61% +6%
Doogee S55
9574 Points ∼63% +10%
Oukitel K7
Points ∼0% -100%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10054 Points ∼67% +16%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
8703 Points ∼58% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=539)
15106 Points ∼100% +74%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
17 fps ∼54%
Crosscall Action-X3
15 fps ∼48% -12%
Doogee S55
17 fps ∼54% 0%
Oukitel K7
12 fps ∼38% -29%
Blackview P10000 Pro
21 fps ∼67% +24%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
17 fps ∼54% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=563)
31.3 fps ∼100% +84%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
15 fps ∼58%
Crosscall Action-X3
26 fps ∼100% +73%
Doogee S55
23 fps ∼88% +53%
Oukitel K7
12 fps ∼46% -20%
Blackview P10000 Pro
20 fps ∼77% +33%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
15 fps ∼58% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=566)
24.9 fps ∼96% +66%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
7.1 fps ∼42%
Crosscall Action-X3
6.7 fps ∼40% -6%
Doogee S55
7.1 fps ∼42% 0%
Oukitel K7
5.9 fps ∼35% -17%
Blackview P10000 Pro
11 fps ∼65% +55%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
7.1 fps ∼42% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=485)
16.8 fps ∼100% +137%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
6.7 fps ∼42%
Crosscall Action-X3
14 fps ∼88% +109%
Doogee S55
13 fps ∼81% +94%
Oukitel K7
5.6 fps ∼35% -16%
Blackview P10000 Pro
10 fps ∼63% +49%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
6.7 fps ∼42% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=488)
16 fps ∼100% +139%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Crosscall Action-X3
4.4 fps ∼31%
Doogee S55
4.7 fps ∼33%
Oukitel K7
4.2 fps ∼29%
Blackview P10000 Pro
6.9 fps ∼48%
Media della classe Smartphone (10 - 88, n=348)
14.4 fps ∼100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
4.5 fps ∼32%
Crosscall Action-X3
10 fps ∼72% +122%
Doogee S55
9.5 fps ∼68% +111%
Oukitel K7
3.8 fps ∼27% -16%
Blackview P10000 Pro
7.1 fps ∼51% +58%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
4.5 fps ∼32% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=351)
13.9 fps ∼100% +209%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
1.3 fps ∼13%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
1.3 fps ∼13% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=61)
10.3 fps ∼100% +692%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
0.86 fps ∼13%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
0.86 fps ∼13% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=61)
6.56 fps ∼100% +663%
Normal Tier Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
2 fps ∼14%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
2 fps ∼14% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=61)
14.5 fps ∼100% +625%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
2.3 fps ∼14%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
2.3 fps ∼14% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (6 - 63, n=60)
15.9 fps ∼100% +591%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
2.5 fps ∼25%
Crosscall Action-X3
2.4 fps ∼24% -4%
Doogee S55
2.5 fps ∼25% 0%
Oukitel K7
2.5 fps ∼25% 0%
Blackview P10000 Pro
4 fps ∼40% +60%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
2.5 fps ∼25% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=279)
9.88 fps ∼100% +295%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
2.4 fps ∼27%
Crosscall Action-X3
5.3 fps ∼60% +121%
Doogee S55
4.9 fps ∼55% +104%
Oukitel K7
2.4 fps ∼27% 0%
Blackview P10000 Pro
4.1 fps ∼46% +71%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
2.4 fps ∼27% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (6 - 58, n=282)
8.89 fps ∼100% +270%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
51621 Points ∼44%
Crosscall Action-X3
57023 Points ∼48% +10%
Doogee S55
56375 Points ∼48% +9%
Oukitel K7
52278 Points ∼44% +1%
Blackview P10000 Pro
73697 Points ∼62% +43%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
51621 Points ∼44% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=169)
118333 Points ∼100% +129%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
42273 Points ∼56%
Crosscall Action-X3
42924 Points ∼56% +2%
Oukitel K7
43320 Points ∼57% +2%
Blackview P10000 Pro
59656 Points ∼78% +41%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
42273 Points ∼56% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=386)
76035 Points ∼100% +80%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
10 Points ∼1%
Doogee S55
624 Points ∼81% +6140%
Oukitel K7
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Blackview P10000 Pro
771 Points ∼100% +7610%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=498)
698 Points ∼91% +6880%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
642 Points ∼37%
Doogee S55
649 Points ∼37% +1%
Oukitel K7
471 Points ∼27% -27%
Blackview P10000 Pro
931 Points ∼54% +45%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
642 Points ∼37% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=498)
1738 Points ∼100% +171%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
926 Points ∼58%
Doogee S55
1030 Points ∼65% +11%
Oukitel K7
967 Points ∼61% +4%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1596 Points ∼100% +72%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
926 Points ∼58% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=498)
1244 Points ∼78% +34%
System (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
1330 Points ∼41%
Doogee S55
2003 Points ∼62% +51%
Oukitel K7
1786 Points ∼55% +34%
Blackview P10000 Pro
3229 Points ∼100% +143%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
1330 Points ∼41% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=498)
2508 Points ∼78% +89%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Oukitel WP2
295 Points ∼22%
Crosscall Action-X3
Points ∼0% -100%
Doogee S55
956 Points ∼70% +224%
Oukitel K7
298 Points ∼22% +1%
Blackview P10000 Pro
1370 Points ∼100% +364%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
295 Points ∼22% 0%
Media della classe Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=502)
1254 Points ∼92% +325%

Legenda

 
Oukitel WP2 Mediatek MT6750T, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Crosscall Action-X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Doogee S55 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel K7 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview P10000 Pro Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Media della classe Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=421)
36.7 Points ∼100% +133%
Doogee S55 (Chrome 67)
18.724 Points ∼51% +19%
Oukitel K7 (Chrome 67)
18.23 Points ∼50% +16%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
18.048 Points ∼49% +15%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.876 Points ∼49% +14%
Oukitel WP2 (Chroome Mobile 70)
15.734 Points ∼43%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
15.7 Points ∼43% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Media della classe Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=556)
5550 Points ∼100% +80%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
3443 Points ∼62% +12%
Doogee S55 (Chrome 67)
3417 Points ∼62% +11%
Oukitel K7 (Chrome 67)
3403 Points ∼61% +10%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
3251 Points ∼59% +5%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
3082 Points ∼56%
Media Mediatek MT6750T
3082 Points ∼56% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Oukitel K7 (Chrome 67)
13931.4 ms * ∼100% -0%
Media Mediatek MT6750T (13903 - 13903, n=2)
13903 ms * ∼100% -0%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
13902.5 ms * ∼100%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
13902.5 ms * ∼100% -0%
Doogee S55 (Chrome 67)
13510.3 ms * ∼97% +3%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
13331 ms * ∼96% +4%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
12786.8 ms * ∼92% +8%
Media della classe Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=577)
11486 ms * ∼82% +17%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Oukitel WP2Crosscall Action-X3Doogee S55Oukitel K7Blackview P10000 ProMedia 64 GB eMMC FlashMedia della classe Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
19%
-11%
6%
18%
36%
2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
47.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
56.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
17%
14.11
-71%
56.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18%
73.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
53%
54.2 (14.1 - 74.7, n=67)
13%
45.4 (3.4 - 87.1, n=316)
-5%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
72.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
84.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
73.73
2%
72.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
80.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
73 (21.1 - 86.9, n=67)
1%
63.7 (8.2 - 96.5, n=316)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
13.23
8.4
-37%
13.17
0%
13.03
-2%
14.6
10%
19.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=76)
50%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=606)
22%
Random Read 4KB
26.89
47
75%
28.86
7%
27.78
3%
29.98
11%
49.8 (11.4 - 149, n=76)
85%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=606)
42%
Sequential Write 256KB
98.58
139.3
41%
97.14
-1%
110.35
12%
112.3
14%
164 (40 - 246, n=76)
66%
79.7 (2.99 - 246, n=606)
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB
267.61
264.7
-1%
268.07
0%
280.32
5%
284.33
6%
270 (115 - 704, n=76)
1%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=606)
-14%
Carico massimo
 35.1 °C34.8 °C34.8 °C 
 34.3 °C33.3 °C34.1 °C 
 31.6 °C32.3 °C34.4 °C 
Massima: 35.1 °C
Media: 33.9 °C
29.2 °C29.9 °C31.7 °C
29 °C29.1 °C31.7 °C
29.2 °C28.9 °C30.7 °C
Massima: 31.7 °C
Media: 29.9 °C
Alimentazione (max)  33.5 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.730252535.83126.823.74026.327.85029.837.76327.426.5802125.510019.525.312518.821.116019.225.420017.625.825016.931.131515.841.34001549.35001560.963014.766.680014.871100014.673.9125014.373.2160013.473.3200014.473.3250014.473.7315014.873.840001577500014.881.1630014.779.780001570.31000014.962.71250015.254.81600015.742.2SPL26.887.3N0.966.5median 15median 66.6Delta1.215.83030.130.123.529.328.426.92632.826.624.824.520.723.219.535.718.644.221.451.72552.617.454.516.255.418.458.215.461.713.56513.764.213.768.414.673.414.975.914.476.414.777.114.677.414.878.314.776.914.676.51575.614.966.915.159.614.951.827.287.30.967.5median 14.9median 651.411.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel WP2Apple iPhone XS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel WP2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone XS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.14 / 1.99 / 2.03 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.72 / 5.96 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oukitel WP2
10214 mAh
Crosscall Action-X3
3500 mAh
Doogee S55
5500 mAh
Oukitel K7
10000 mAh
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Media Mediatek MT6750T
 
Media della classe Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-21%
-118%
-5%
5%
0%
7%
Idle Minimum *
1.14
1.1
4%
2.3
-102%
1.01
11%
0.63
45%
1.14
-0%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=634)
23%
Idle Average *
1.99
1.9
5%
3.5
-76%
1.99
-0%
2.2
-11%
1.99
-0%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=633)
14%
Idle Maximum *
2.03
2.9
-43%
5.9
-191%
2.09
-3%
2.3
-13%
2.03
-0%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=634)
2%
Load Average *
3.72
4.8
-29%
8.7
-134%
4.1
-10%
3.57
4%
3.72
-0%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=628)
-8%
Load Maximum *
5.96
8.4
-41%
11.2
-88%
7.2
-21%
5.82
2%
5.96
-0%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=628)
4%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
24ore 08minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19ore 06minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
9ore 04minuti
Oukitel WP2
10214 mAh
Crosscall Action-X3
3500 mAh
Doogee S55
5500 mAh
Oukitel K7
10000 mAh
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
-26%
-26%
13%
88%
Reader / Idle
1448
WiFi v1.3
1146
843
-26%
844
-26%
1294
13%
2149
88%
Load
544

Pro

+ robusto
+ grande display
+ alta risoluzione
+ GPS/GLONASS molto buono
+ spazio di archiviazione sufficiente
+ impermeabile secondo lo standard IP68

Contro

- durata della batteria inadeguata
- scarse prestazioni del sistema
- spesso e pesante
- cattiva qualità audio
- fotocamera mediocre
- l'altoparlante non si spegne da solo quando si utilizzano le cuffie
Recensione dell'Oukitel WP2. Modello di test fornito da Oukitel.
Recensione dell'Oukitel WP2. Modello di test fornito da Oukitel.

In definitiva il titolo introduttivo di questo test non era poi così sbagliato. Per certi versi, l'Oukitel WP2 è davvero un power bank con poche funzioni di smartphone. Ma non dovete fraintendere, il WP2 non è un cattivo smartphone. La fattura è decente, la custodia è robusta e il display è grande con un'alta risoluzione. Anche la memoria di lavoro e la memorizzazione sono sufficientemente grandi. Il processore e l'unità grafica non sono i migliori, ma ad essere onesti, otteniamo quello per cui paghiamo qui. Quindi non possiamo lamentarci con Oukitel per il rapporto prezzo/prestazioni. 

Un power bank con funzionalità da smartphone e una deludente durata della batteria.

C'è qualcosa che non va. Perché usare uno schermo grande, se a causa delle basse prestazioni molti compiti produttivi non possono essere realizzati comunque? Perché solo una macchina fotografica mediocre, visto che dovrebbe essere la prima preoccupazione quando si scattano foto all'aperto? Perché non scegliere qualcosa di un po' più piccolo e luminoso? Ciò che ci mette a disagio qui è apparentemente la selezione molto sbilanciata dei componenti. Ma probabilmente la critica più grande è la deludente durata della batteria. Non è necessario portare con sé un mattone da 350 grammi (12 oz) per raggiungere questi tempi di autonomia. Quindi possiamo solo dire che i gusti e le esigenze variano, e anche l'Oukitel troverà acquirenti interessati che stanno cercando esattamente questa combinazione. Per questi acquirenti, possiamo consigliarlo.

Oukitel WP2 - 11/12/2018 v6
Florian Schaar

Chassis
86%
Tastiera
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositivo di puntamento
72%
Connettività
34 / 60 → 57%
Peso
85%
Batteria
100%
Display
82%
Prestazioni di gioco
15 / 63 → 23%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
34 / 70 → 49%
Temperatura
93%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Fotocamera
61%
Media
68%
76%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione dello Smartphone Oukitel WP2
Florian Schaar, 2018-11-26 (Update: 2018-12- 2)