Notebookcheck

Recensione dell'Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T: Una potente workstation con qualche punto debole

Workstation da 2 kg (4,4 libbre). La workstation Asus mostra alcuni punti di forza importanti nella nostra recensione grazie ad un livello di prestazioni molto elevato, display 4K e 16 GB di VRAM. Inoltre, il nostro dispositivo dispone di 32 GB di RAM e di un SSD da 1 TB. Tuttavia, non c'è una porta Thunderbolt 3.
Sascha Mölck (traduzione a cura di Giuliano De Luca), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Processore
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Coffee Lake-H
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q - 16384 MB, Core: 1350 MHz, Memoria: 1500 MHz, 80 W TDP, GDDR6, 27.21.14.5257 (Nvidia 452.57), Optimus
Memoria
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, dual-channel, uno slot di memoria (occupato), 16 GB a bordo, 32 GB nel nostro modello di recensione, 48 GB (importo massimo)
Schermo
15.60 pollici 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, lucido: no, 60 Hz
Scheda madre
Intel HM370
Harddisk
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
, 2x M.2-2280-Slot, RAID 0, 890 GB libera
Porte di connessione
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: presa combinata cuffia/microfono, TPM 2.0
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 18.9 x 360 x 252
Batteria
76 Wh, 4940 mAh polimeri di litio, 15.4 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Tastiera: chiclet-style, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, McAfee LiveSafe (versione di prova), MS Office 365 (versione di prova), 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2 kg, Alimentazione: 795 gr
Prezzo
5500 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

, , , , , ,
relazione di ricerca.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Punteggio
Data
Modello
Peso
Altezza
Dimensione
Risoluzione
Miglior Prezzo
83.1 %
11/2020
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2 kg18.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
83.4 %
09/2020
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
i9-10980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.3 kg19.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
87.8 %
09/2020
Dell Precision 7550
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.8 kg27.36 mm15.60"3840x2160
87 %
08/2020
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.2 kg13.98 mm15.60"3840x2160

Confronto dimensioni

360 mm 242 mm 27.36 mm 2.8 kg360 mm 252 mm 18.9 mm 2 kg358 mm 248 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg355 mm 235 mm 13.98 mm 2.2 kg

Connessioni

Lato sinistro: alimentazione, porta Gigabit Ethernet, uscita HDMI, porta USB 3.2 Gen 1 (tipo A), presa per microfono, presa per cuffie
Lato sinistro: alimentazione, porta Gigabit Ethernet, uscita HDMI, porta USB 3.2 Gen 1 (tipo A), presa per microfono, presa per cuffie
A destra: Porta USB 3.2 Gen 2 (tipo C), due porte USB 3.2 Gen 1 (tipo A), Kensington lock
A destra: Porta USB 3.2 Gen 2 (tipo C), due porte USB 3.2 Gen 1 (tipo A), Kensington lock
, , , , , ,
relazione di ricerca.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1595 (1327min - 1824max) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1476 (1355min - 1581max) MBit/s ∼93% +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1346 (1260min - 1382max) MBit/s ∼84%
Media Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=112)
1092 MBit/s ∼68% -19%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1011 (507min - 1065max) MBit/s ∼63% -25%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1368 (735min - 1454max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1353 (1259min - 1416max) MBit/s ∼99%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1316 (579min - 1479max) MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Media Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1640, n=113)
1175 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
899 (873min - 913max) MBit/s ∼66% -34%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180013581259133913421335130313141321130613361372139312921382134713721374135613081299137113291340137614061411140814061395141689889490790891189389591390189489889390789491089289790490289389590590288989590089987389989186391286485280757912221404143614751459147914691442143914511469136113701478146214681467144914721457147314721429147614291424142314161435140114401421142514331422121873595010941376141514281428142514041416143114471398143014431454144114241358125913391342133513031314132113061336137213931292138213471372137413561308129913711329134013761406141114081406139514168988949079089118938959139018948988939078949108928979049028938959059028898959008998738998918639128648528075791222140414361475145914791469144214391451146913611370147814621468146714491472145714731472142914761429142414231416143514011440142114251433142212187359501094137614151428142814251404141614311447139814301443145414411424135313651358136513341332136213371362136013741338138213321365134113361344135213691355134513501349130113071342135512601346152415061485151414921455155814941516141414381375150215061355144615341492139914921497140714751539146715311366150514121581507100289281599799098191710131038100410651033100810411049103910321049996105510481014104010491042104110311026997132713811600143114771400163713771501178318121642182415971573147413901570149615801533165318131796182116771553158117361812Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1352 (1259-1416)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (873-913)
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1315 (579-1479)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1368 (735-1454)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1346 (1260-1382)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1355-1581)
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø994 (507-1065)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (1327-1824)
329
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 344 cd/m² Media: 334.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18.5 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 93 %
Al centro con la batteria: 337 cd/m²
Contrasto: 930:1 (Nero: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.76 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.12 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
85% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
94.98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.62% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.06% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
AU Optronics B156HAB03.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell Precision 7550
AU Optronics B156ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Display
-22%
1%
9%
Display P3 Coverage
82.06
62.81
-23%
82.09
0%
99.87
22%
sRGB Coverage
97.62
86.89
-11%
99.6
2%
100
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
94.98
63.59
-33%
96.76
2%
97.31
2%
Response Times
21%
8%
91%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
58 ?(27, 31)
44.8 ?(21.2, 23.6)
23%
51.2 ?(24.4, 26.8)
12%
4 ?(2, 2)
93%
Response Time Black / White *
35 ?(20, 15)
28.8 ?(17.2, 11.6)
18%
34 ?(20, 14)
3%
4 ?(2, 2)
89%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-25%
-33%
192%
Brightness middle
344
374.5
9%
473.5
38%
380
10%
Brightness
335
363
8%
461
38%
388
16%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
90
-3%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.37
0.42
-14%
0.55
-49%
0.018
95%
Contrast
930
892
-4%
861
-7%
21111
2170%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.76
4.05
-130%
4.8
-173%
5.47
-211%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.31
8.17
-90%
8.73
-103%
8.19
-90%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.12
2.6
17%
5.6
-79%
5.3
-70%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.21 100%
2.34 94%
2.15 102%
CCT
6563 99%
7027 93%
7549 86%
6128 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
85
56.4
-34%
86.4
2%
86
1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
86.3
-12%
99.7
2%
100
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.36
3.08
3.04
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-9% / -19%
-8% / -21%
97% / 142%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
35 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 20 ms Incremento
↘ 15 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 90 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (23.8 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
58 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 27 ms Incremento
↘ 31 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 93 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (37.7 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 52 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 17025 (minimo: 5 - massimo: 2500000) Hz è stata rilevata.

0951902853804755706657608559501045114012351330142515201615171018051279.061282.221261.991162.861117.661078.61026.3993.64990.2988.63995.17993.25990.56991.35987.51977.33995.57984.86987.12984.11995.57994.8989.81983.33990.93991.72992.48995.2995.57989.02993.27985.61992.111029.18992.88994.04990.171025.88986988.291286.111266.381273.321260.161272.021270.161274.581273.321265.741261.991264.461270.771269.521268.911274.581261.391272.671267.631273.931269.521260.761269.521267.631263.861261.391267.031272.671263.221263.861265.741281.61264.461275.841265.141263.221266.381270.121273.931266.381270.161841.621843.7417521647.111661.061663.891657.621656.451660.781660.31659.681658.4416571651.461656.861664.451659.21655.831662.651658.241654.881653.641660.231661.611666.391658.991656.251657.211656.381656.381658.11661.751657.141647.181658.791662.581660.9216651657.761661.131656.451657.211658.311656.181660.781653.711665.071660.511662.991656.731652.141604.621609.011603.531609.791589.641613.681604.361602.441604.171604.171577.911607.21602.891607.071608.171608.31605.911602.051607.461605.911604.31605.851607.141612.321610.371608.431605.651607.071608.041604.361609.591608.881611.541608.361607.591606.551597.381602.821605.591603.851608.691598.151599.11604.561612.191601.921609.461609.851607.011136.431010.611012.431011.071013.21010.181010.871013.611013.171015.671012.561012.911014.841010.611014.171012.741012.841014.251010.871015.981011.071009.671009.741014.891014.431015.491012.891011.11014.481013.381015.981013.351015.051016.131015.11011.051012.841014.691012.091013.15Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1024 (977.33-1282.22)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H; Rendering: Ø1269 (1260.16-1286.11)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1668 (1647.11-1843.74)
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M, Intel Xeon W-10885M: Ø1606 (1577.91-1652.14)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1016 (1009.67-1136.43)
Clocks della CPU durante il ciclo continuo CB15
Clocks della CPU durante il ciclo continuo CB15
Clocks della CPU durante il ciclo continuo CB15 (modalità di rendering)
Clocks della CPU durante il ciclo continuo CB15 (modalità di rendering)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
188 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1282 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
175.25 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
Aiuto
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
210 Points ∼100% +12%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
208 Points ∼99% +11%
Media della classe Workstation
  (178 - 241, n=41, last 2 years)
205 Points ∼98% +9%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
193 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points ∼90%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
188 Points ∼90% 0%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
184 Points ∼88% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1714 (1647.11min - 1843.74max) Points ∼100% +34%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1652 (1577.91min - 1652.14max) Points ∼96% +29%
Media della classe Workstation
  (675 - 2144, n=42, last 2 years)
1322 Points ∼77% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
1286 Points ∼75% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1282 Points ∼75%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points ∼69% -8%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
1111 Points ∼65% -13%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
435.2 Seconds * ∼100%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (342 - 495, n=21)
433 Seconds * ∼99% +1%
Media della classe Workstation
  (250 - 703, n=35, last 2 years)
400 Seconds * ∼92% +8%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
386.2 Seconds * ∼89% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
342.1 Seconds * ∼79% +21%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
281 Seconds * ∼65% +35%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
273 Seconds * ∼63% +37%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
5495 MIPS ∼100% +13%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5335 MIPS ∼97% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
5310 MIPS ∼97% +9%
Media della classe Workstation
  (4417 - 5773, n=36, last 2 years)
5277 MIPS ∼96% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
4865 MIPS ∼89%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4580 - 5090, n=21)
4846 MIPS ∼88% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
4695 MIPS ∼85% -3%
7z b 4
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48730 MIPS ∼100% +50%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
48044 MIPS ∼99% +48%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
38363 MIPS ∼79% +18%
Media della classe Workstation
  (19147 - 50552, n=36, last 2 years)
36718 MIPS ∼75% +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
34535 MIPS ∼71% +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
32555 MIPS ∼67%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28512 - 35174, n=21)
32357 MIPS ∼66% -1%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Media della classe Workstation
  (436 - 618, n=38, last 2 years)
509 Points ∼100% +10%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
500 Points ∼98% +8%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
488 Points ∼96% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
473 Points ∼93% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
462 Points ∼91%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (416 - 486, n=55)
443 Points ∼87% -4%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
4161 Points ∼100% +33%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
3930 Points ∼94% +25%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
3133 Points ∼75%
Media della classe Workstation
  (1602 - 5180, n=39, last 2 years)
3089 Points ∼74% -1%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
2800 Points ∼67% -11%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (2017 - 3133, n=55)
2564 Points ∼62% -18%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Media della classe Workstation
  (1124 - 1702, n=31, last 2 years)
1359 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1341 Points ∼99% +11%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1331 Points ∼98% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
1289 Points ∼95% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1207 Points ∼89%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1117 - 1251, n=13)
1190 Points ∼88% -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
8378 Points ∼100% +44%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8347 Points ∼100% +44%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
7189 Points ∼86% +24%
Media della classe Workstation
  (3852 - 9100, n=31, last 2 years)
6525 Points ∼78% +12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
5813 Points ∼69%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4859 - 6262, n=13)
5597 Points ∼67% -4%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
13.1 fps ∼100% +58%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps ∼99% +57%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
10.7 fps ∼82% +29%
Media della classe Workstation
  (5.24 - 14.6, n=35, last 2 years)
10.2 fps ∼78% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
10.1 fps ∼77% +22%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (7.1 - 10.7, n=21)
8.72 fps ∼67% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
8.3 fps ∼63%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
59.96 s * ∼100% -0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
59.75 s * ∼100%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (54.5 - 64.7, n=9)
59 s * ∼98% +1%
Media della classe Workstation
  (41.3 - 106, n=35, last 2 years)
53.4 s * ∼89% +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.15 s * ∼79% +21%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
46.5 s * ∼78% +22%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
44 s * ∼73% +26%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
0.658 sec * ∼100% -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.643 sec * ∼98%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H
  (0.608 - 0.695, n=14)
0.643 sec * ∼98% -0%
Media della classe Workstation
  (0.541 - 0.695, n=34, last 2 years)
0.591 sec * ∼90% +8%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.586 sec * ∼89% +9%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.574 sec * ∼87% +11%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
0.57 sec * ∼87% +11%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3524 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3985 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4436 punti
PCMark 10 Score
4877 punti
Aiuto
PCMark 10
Score
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
5904 Points ∼67% +21%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5846 Points ∼67% +20%
Media della classe Workstation
  (4096 - 6939, n=37, last 2 years)
5543 Points ∼63% +14%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (4877 - 5317, n=2)
5097 Points ∼58% +5%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4884 Points ∼56% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4877 Points ∼56%
Essentials
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
10829 Points ∼94% +23%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
9811 Points ∼85% +11%
Media della classe Workstation
  (8059 - 10829, n=37, last 2 years)
9495 Points ∼83% +8%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8890 Points ∼77% +1%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (8809 - 8970, n=2)
8890 Points ∼77% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8809 Points ∼77%
Productivity
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8877 Points ∼80% +23%
Media della classe Workstation
  (6426 - 9317, n=37, last 2 years)
7925 Points ∼71% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7796 Points ∼70% +8%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
7735 Points ∼69% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7205 Points ∼65%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (6892 - 7205, n=2)
7049 Points ∼63% -2%
Digital Content Creation
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
7360 Points ∼47% +48%
Media della classe Workstation
  (3221 - 10441, n=37, last 2 years)
6319 Points ∼41% +27%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (4962 - 6601, n=2)
5782 Points ∼37% +17%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5640 Points ∼36% +14%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4962 Points ∼32%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4563 Points ∼29% -8%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
4418 Points ∼70% +25%
Media della classe Workstation
  (3311 - 4487, n=21, last 2 years)
3916 Points ∼62% +11%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
3781 Points ∼60% +7%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3654 Points ∼58% +4%
Media Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (3524 - 3551, n=2)
3538 Points ∼56% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3524 Points ∼56%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1938.1 μs * ∼100%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3502 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2390 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 397.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 340.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2431 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2387 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 43.38 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 1107 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Dell Precision 7550
SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Media Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
 
Media della classe Workstation
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
3%
-13%
-2%
-14%
-3%
Write 4K
1107
185.8
-83%
121
-89%
132.9
-88%
166 ?(92.4 - 1107, n=25)
-85%
168 ?(86.3 - 1107, n=34, last 2 years)
-85%
Read 4K
43.38
47.21
9%
42.16
-3%
46.73
8%
44.6 ?(37 - 52.6, n=25)
3%
51.1 ?(31.1 - 88.5, n=34, last 2 years)
18%
Write Seq
2387
2874
20%
2150
-10%
2214
-7%
1982 ?(981 - 2389, n=25)
-17%
2146 ?(1185 - 3320, n=33, last 2 years)
-10%
Read Seq
2431
1786
-27%
1755
-28%
2018
-17%
1764 ?(976 - 2543, n=25)
-27%
2112 ?(1132 - 3351, n=33, last 2 years)
-13%
Write 4K Q32T1
340.7
466.8
37%
395.3
16%
478.9
41%
395 ?(205 - 603, n=25)
16%
454 ?(312 - 666, n=34, last 2 years)
33%
Read 4K Q32T1
397.8
562.8
41%
381.8
-4%
540.2
36%
434 ?(270 - 592, n=25)
9%
456 ?(289 - 745, n=34, last 2 years)
15%
Write Seq Q32T1
2390
3091
29%
2730
14%
2975
24%
2351 ?(1706 - 2404, n=25)
-2%
2831 ?(853 - 5089, n=34, last 2 years)
18%
Read Seq Q32T1
3502
3395
-3%
3468
-1%
3195
-9%
3234 ?(1758 - 3505, n=25)
-8%
3555 ?(2201 - 7071, n=34, last 2 years)
2%
AS SSD
8%
-31%
-12%
-9%
-14%
Seq Read
2702.12
2321.37
-14%
2027.61
-25%
1982.19
-27%
1993 ?(870 - 3002, n=26)
-26%
2749 ?(1308 - 5505, n=36, last 2 years)
2%
Seq Write
2347.81
2619.99
12%
1192.77
-49%
2251.61
-4%
2036 ?(1220 - 2424, n=26)
-13%
1763 ?(908 - 3908, n=36, last 2 years)
-25%
4K Read
37.59
48.57
29%
42.31
13%
47.13
25%
46.4 ?(27 - 56.8, n=26)
23%
47.9 ?(22.5 - 78, n=36, last 2 years)
27%
4K Write
107.12
165.06
54%
105.49
-2%
88.16
-18%
110 ?(10.3 - 146, n=26)
3%
126 ?(10.3 - 215, n=36, last 2 years)
18%
4K-64 Read
1490.62
1712.16
15%
1128.12
-24%
1480.51
-1%
1502 ?(693 - 1873, n=26)
1%
1342 ?(858 - 2356, n=36, last 2 years)
-10%
4K-64 Write
1793.98
2174.26
21%
1537.04
-14%
1841.59
3%
1625 ?(992 - 1882, n=26)
-9%
1675 ?(835 - 3300, n=36, last 2 years)
-7%
Access Time Read *
0.046
0.057
-24%
0.069
-50%
0.087
-89%
0.0516 ?(0.033 - 0.089, n=26)
-12%
0.0634 ?(0.024 - 0.156, n=34, last 2 years)
-38%
Access Time Write *
0.034
0.068
-100%
0.106
-212%
0.04
-18%
0.0558 ?(0.026 - 0.208, n=26)
-64%
0.076 ?(0.019 - 0.99, n=36, last 2 years)
-124%
Score Read
1798
1993
11%
1373
-24%
1726
-4%
1747 ?(966 - 2221, n=26)
-3%
1665 ?(1166 - 2961, n=36, last 2 years)
-7%
Score Write
2136
2601
22%
1762
-18%
2155
1%
1942 ?(1323 - 2249, n=26)
-9%
1979 ?(1048 - 3837, n=36, last 2 years)
-7%
Score Total
4835
5630
16%
3801
-21%
4781
-1%
4588 ?(2742 - 5565, n=26)
-5%
4451 ?(2781 - 8226, n=36, last 2 years)
-8%
Copy ISO MB/s
2302.06
2588.93
12%
1768.18
-23%
1981.66
-14%
2280 ?(1375 - 3193, n=18)
-1%
2336 ?(901 - 3201, n=22, last 2 years)
1%
Copy Program MB/s
564.27
790.95
40%
627.09
11%
501.25
-11%
558 ?(198 - 874, n=18)
-1%
533 ?(106 - 1074, n=22, last 2 years)
-6%
Copy Game MB/s
1336.11
1624.51
22%
1476.6
11%
1139.5
-15%
1302 ?(865 - 1677, n=18)
-3%
1218 ?(357 - 1929, n=22, last 2 years)
-9%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
6% / 6%
-22% / -24%
-7% / -8%
-12% / -10%
-9% / -10%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Carico di lettura continuo: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

010020030040050060070080090010001100120013001400150016001700180019002000210022002300240025002600270028002900300031003200330034002472.633257.913260.423260.633260.633262.123262.523263.353263.353264.193264.193264.223264.223264.433264.643265.063265.243265.483265.693266.913267.573267.753268.173269.213269.213269.423269.673270.053270.053270.093271.933272.613273.033274.653275.913276.593277.853317.143331.583333.893334.513336.153337.233338.913339.123341.423342.053343.093346.653356.072690.443418.993418.993419.623419.623419.833419.833419.833420.043420.043420.043420.043420.043420.043420.043420.043420.253420.253420.253420.253420.253420.253420.253420.253420.253420.253420.453420.453420.453420.663420.663420.663420.663420.873420.873420.873420.873420.873421.083421.083421.083421.083421.083421.293421.53421.53421.53421.713422.133422.341331.551576.842592.772708.32849.823297.473298.313301.033301.343301.763301.863303.013303.643304.063304.2733053305.423305.423306.473306.583306.683306.793307.633308.473310.653312.243355.863413.423414.583414.673417.393418.993419.283419.623419.833420.663421.163421.373422.343422.843424.513425.773426.193427.173427.863430.583430.943432.053433.043434.092495.823025.143027.663028.923030.593031.433032.063032.483032.693033.113033.323033.533033.533034.163034.37303530353035.213035.213035.213035.213035.633036.473037.513037.513037.723037.933038.353038.563038.983040.033040.663040.873041.53041.923042.343042.553043.63043.63043.813045.483045.93046.533047.163047.373049.893050.13051.573052.823053.66Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø3270 (2472.63-3356.07)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00: Ø3406 (2690.44-3422.34)
Dell Precision 7550 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB: Ø3251 (1331.55-3434.09)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø3028 (2495.82-3053.66)
3DMark 11 Performance
20824 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29456 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16986 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score
6972 punti
Aiuto
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
27607 Points ∼100% +5%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
27290 Points ∼99% +4%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (24156 - 28524, n=9)
26602 Points ∼96% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
26550 Points ∼96% +1%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
26242 Points ∼95% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
26219 Points ∼95%
Media della classe Workstation
  (4110 - 32999, n=40, last 2 years)
17689 Points ∼64% -33%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
20164 Points ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
19924 Points ∼99% +2%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (18247 - 21115, n=10)
19825 Points ∼98% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
19616 Points ∼97%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
19353 Points ∼96% -1%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
19342 Points ∼96% -1%
Media della classe Workstation
  (3169 - 24354, n=39, last 2 years)
13273 Points ∼66% -32%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
126073 Points ∼100% +125%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (50993 - 126073, n=7)
78524 Points ∼62% +40%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
71388 Points ∼57% +28%
Media della classe Workstation
  (18564 - 133756, n=27, last 2 years)
57553 Points ∼46% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
55927 Points ∼44%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
50993 Points ∼40% -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
7645 Points ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
7459 Points ∼98% +3%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (6999 - 7977, n=10)
7432 Points ∼97% +3%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
7349 Points ∼96% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)
7331 Points ∼96% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
7234 Points ∼95%
Media della classe Workstation
  (988 - 9956, n=40, last 2 years)
4998 Points ∼65% -31%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
156.91 fps ∼100% +33%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
138.42 fps ∼88% +17%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
135.9 fps ∼87% +15%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (107 - 157, n=8)
126 fps ∼80% +7%
Media della classe Workstation
  (69.1 - 230, n=18, last 2 years)
125 fps ∼80% +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
118.27 fps ∼75%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
165.01 fps ∼100% +33%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
152.9 fps ∼93% +23%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (121 - 165, n=8)
140 fps ∼85% +12%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
127.52 fps ∼77% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
124.52 fps ∼75%
Media della classe Workstation
  (10.5 - 258, n=18, last 2 years)
118 fps ∼72% -5%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
98.84 fps ∼100% +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
96.9 fps ∼98% +9%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
96.14 fps ∼97% +8%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (89 - 100, n=8)
95.8 fps ∼97% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
89 fps ∼90%
Media della classe Workstation
  (26.8 - 126, n=18, last 2 years)
80.4 fps ∼81% -10%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
66.4 fps ∼100% +15%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
65.81 fps ∼99% +14%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
63.34 fps ∼95% +10%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (57.8 - 66.4, n=8)
62.6 fps ∼94% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
57.83 fps ∼87%
Media della classe Workstation
  (14.3 - 109, n=18, last 2 years)
52.9 fps ∼80% -9%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
105.42 fps ∼100% +43%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
92.7 fps ∼88% +26%
Media della classe Workstation
  (41 - 179, n=18, last 2 years)
83.7 fps ∼79% +13%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (70.3 - 105, n=8)
83.4 fps ∼79% +13%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
76.36 fps ∼72% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
73.82 fps ∼70%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
14.82 fps ∼100% +7%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (13.3 - 16.1, n=8)
14.5 fps ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
14.4 fps ∼97% +4%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
13.93 fps ∼94% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
13.82 fps ∼93%
Media della classe Workstation
  (3.86 - 26, n=18, last 2 years)
12.4 fps ∼84% -10%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
145.14 fps ∼100% +27%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
136.01 fps ∼94% +19%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (114 - 145, n=8)
127 fps ∼88% +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
122.7 fps ∼85% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
114.13 fps ∼79%
Media della classe Workstation
  (54 - 172, n=18, last 2 years)
113 fps ∼78% -1%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
154.88 fps ∼100% +37%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
133.7 fps ∼86% +18%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (113 - 155, n=8)
126 fps ∼81% +11%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
125 fps ∼81% +11%
Media della classe Workstation
  (53.2 - 220, n=18, last 2 years)
121 fps ∼78% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
113.08 fps ∼73%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
184.2 fps ∼100% +16%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (159 - 184, n=4)
176 fps ∼96% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
158.88 fps ∼86%
Media della classe Workstation
  (93.7 - 236, n=8, last 2 years)
154 fps ∼84% -3%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
158.94 fps ∼100% +33%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
150.44 fps ∼95% +26%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
138.3 fps ∼87% +16%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (120 - 159, n=8)
135 fps ∼85% +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
119.66 fps ∼75%
Media della classe Workstation
  (57.3 - 204, n=37, last 2 years)
111 fps ∼70% -7%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
306.13 fps ∼100% +25%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
295.24 fps ∼96% +21%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
292.9 fps ∼96% +20%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (244 - 306, n=8)
287 fps ∼94% +18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
244.13 fps ∼80%
Media della classe Workstation
  (18.9 - 465, n=37, last 2 years)
175 fps ∼57% -28%
Showcase (showcase-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
98.74 fps ∼100% +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
97.2 fps ∼98% +9%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
95.24 fps ∼96% +7%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (89.2 - 98.7, n=8)
95.2 fps ∼96% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
89.2 fps ∼90%
Media della classe Workstation
  (13.7 - 127, n=36, last 2 years)
63.8 fps ∼65% -28%
Medical (medical-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
102.53 fps ∼100% +15%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
99.1 fps ∼97% +11%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
97.67 fps ∼95% +10%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (79 - 103, n=8)
89.8 fps ∼88% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
88.89 fps ∼87%
Media della classe Workstation
  (15.8 - 133, n=37, last 2 years)
61.3 fps ∼60% -31%
Maya (maya-05)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
231.32 fps ∼100% +29%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
214.3 fps ∼93% +19%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
210.39 fps ∼91% +17%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (180 - 231, n=8)
206 fps ∼89% +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
179.51 fps ∼78%
Media della classe Workstation
  (40.3 - 341, n=37, last 2 years)
145 fps ∼63% -19%
Energy (energy-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
38.34 fps ∼100% +8%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (35.4 - 39.9, n=8)
37.3 fps ∼97% +5%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
36.9 fps ∼96% +4%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
36.8 fps ∼96% +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
35.39 fps ∼92%
Media della classe Workstation
  (0.77 - 57.3, n=37, last 2 years)
24.6 fps ∼64% -30%
Creo (creo-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
238.42 fps ∼100% +31%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
231.9 fps ∼97% +27%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
224.9 fps ∼94% +24%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (182 - 238, n=8)
218 fps ∼91% +20%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
181.9 fps ∼76%
Media della classe Workstation
  (35.3 - 320, n=37, last 2 years)
146 fps ∼61% -20%
Catia (catia-05)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
259.66 fps ∼100% +39%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
242.87 fps ∼94% +30%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
225 fps ∼87% +20%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (187 - 260, n=8)
222 fps ∼85% +19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
186.86 fps ∼72%
Media della classe Workstation
  (47.5 - 339, n=37, last 2 years)
159 fps ∼61% -15%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
180.9 fps ∼100% +15%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
178.3 fps ∼99% +13%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
176.18 fps ∼97% +12%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (157 - 182, n=8)
175 fps ∼97% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
157.31 fps ∼87%
Media della classe Workstation
  (25.3 - 232, n=37, last 2 years)
120 fps ∼66% -24%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (Rendering)
85.3 fps ∼100% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
84.6 fps ∼99%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
83.6 fps ∼98% -1%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (71 - 88.5, n=10)
81.9 fps ∼96% -3%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
81.1 (77min - 87max) fps ∼95% -4%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
77.3 (73min - 82max) fps ∼91% -9%
Media della classe Workstation
  (10.8 - 110, n=37, last 2 years)
56.6 fps ∼66% -33%
Death Stranding - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
101.5 fps ∼100% +4%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (97.4 - 102, n=2)
99.5 fps ∼98% +2%
Media della classe Workstation
  (76 - 120, n=4, last 2 years)
98.7 fps ∼97% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
97.4 fps ∼96%
Horizon Zero Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (rendering)
89 fps ∼100% +3%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (86 - 89, n=2)
87.5 fps ∼98% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
86 fps ∼97%
Media della classe Workstation
  (49 - 91, n=7, last 2 years)
72.7 fps ∼82% -15%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (Rendering)
145.3 fps ∼100% +5%
Media NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (138 - 145, n=3)
141 fps ∼97% +2%
Media della classe Workstation
  (103 - 181, n=5, last 2 years)
141 fps ∼97% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
140.6 fps ∼97% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
137.8 fps ∼95%
0510152025303540455055606570758085