Notebookcheck

Recensione del Portatile Schenker Slim 15 RED (i5-8265U, UHD620)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 03/16/2019

La signora in rosso Schenker continua con il collaudato concetto di barebones configurabili e questa volta aggiunge un po' di colore in gioco. Rimanendo lontano dai case sempre più grigi, anche lo Slim 15 RED Edition con CPU Whiskey Lake, Samsung SSD e 16 GB di RAM è promettente. Nella nostra recensione, spiegheremo cosa possono aspettarsi gli utenti e quali opzioni di configurazione sono disponibili.

Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Processore
Intel Core i5-8265U
Memoria
16384 MB 
, Dual-Channel
Schermo
15.6 pollici 16:9, 2 x 1 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei CMN15E8, IPS, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Harddisk
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, 450 GB libera
Scheda audio
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: 1x jack audio combinato (cuffia), 1x audio 2-in-1 (ingresso microfono + S/PDIF ottico), Lettore schede: Card Reader 6-in-1
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 19.9 x 360.4 x 244.5
Batteria
36 Wh ioni di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9, 1280 x 720p
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Stereo, Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Adattatore di alimentazione, driver CD/USB flash drive, panno per la pulizia, 36 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
1.5 kg, Alimentazione: 365 gr
Prezzo
950 Euro
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19

Confronto Dimensioni

379 mm 258 mm 23 mm 2 kg360.4 mm 244.5 mm 19.9 mm 1.5 kg359 mm 245 mm 17 mm 1.7 kg358 mm 230 mm 15.9 mm 999 g319 mm 199 mm 15.9 mm 1.2 kg

Disposizione delle porte

A sinistra: adattatore di alimentazione, 1x USB 3.0, 1x USB 2.0, 1x ingresso microfono + S/PDIF, 1x jack per cuffie
A sinistra: adattatore di alimentazione, 1x USB 3.0, 1x USB 2.0, 1x ingresso microfono + S/PDIF, 1x jack per cuffie
A destra: 1x Thunderbolt 3, 1x USB 3.0, 1x Mini-DisplayPort, 1x HDMI, lettore di schede 6-in-1, Gigabit Ethernet, Kensington lock
A destra: 1x Thunderbolt 3, 1x USB 3.0, 1x Mini-DisplayPort, 1x HDMI, lettore di schede 6-in-1, Gigabit Ethernet, Kensington lock
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
67.7 MB/s ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=244)
60.5 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
36 MB/s ∼53% -47%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.35 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.9 MB/s ∼35% -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.5 MB/s ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=219)
77.1 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.95 MB/s ∼36% -64%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼33% -67%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
25.8 MB/s ∼32% -68%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
666 (min: 585, max: 685) MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
652 MBit/s ∼98% +12%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 (min: 493, max: 679) MBit/s ∼97% +12%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
580 (min: 528, max: 648) MBit/s ∼87%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
295 (min: 186, max: 388) MBit/s ∼44% -49%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 (min: 520, max: 667) MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
638 (min: 582, max: 695) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
631 (min: 503, max: 648) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
568 (min: 553, max: 591) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
530 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (528-648)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (520-667)
285
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 294 cd/m² Media: 279.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18.3 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 87 %
Al centro con la batteria: 289 cd/m²
Contrasto: 431:1 (Nero: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.74 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.16 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
87% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Chi Mei CMN15E8, , 2x1, 15.6
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
LG Philips LP156WFA-SPG2, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
N156HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
-21%
-4%
-11%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 (18, 19)
44 (23, 21)
-19%
38 (19, 19)
-3%
37.2 (19.6, 17.6)
-1%
42 (21, 21)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (14, 10)
30 (19, 11)
-25%
25 (14, 11)
-4%
32.4 (18.4, 14)
-35%
28 (16, 12)
-17%
PWM Frequency
25000 (20)
20000 (90)
-20%
25770 (67)
3%
Screen
2%
38%
-13%
4%
Brightness middle
289
290
0%
341
18%
285.1
-1%
321
11%
Brightness
280
249
-11%
319
14%
271
-3%
282
1%
Brightness Distribution
87
78
-10%
87
0%
88
1%
77
-11%
Black Level *
0.67
0.38
43%
0.31
54%
0.28
58%
0.2
70%
Contrast
431
763
77%
1100
155%
1018
136%
1605
272%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.74
4.35
-16%
2.01
46%
4.38
-17%
6.35
-70%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.87
11.06
-61%
4.74
31%
24.07
-250%
12.2
-78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.16
3.01
5%
2.01
36%
3.1
2%
8.35
-164%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.44 90%
2.52 87%
2.24 98%
2.51 88%
CCT
6779 96%
7198 90%
6704 97%
6705 97%
8227 79%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
56
-2%
63
11%
40
-30%
59
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87
86
-1%
98
13%
62
-29%
91
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.11
3.95
1.88
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-10% / -3%
17% / 31%
-12% / -13%
-6% / 1%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
24 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 14 ms Incremento
↘ 10 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.8 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 32 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (25.5 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
37 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 18 ms Incremento
↘ 19 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.9 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 32 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono simili alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (40.8 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 25000 Hz ≤ 20 % settaggio luminosita'

Il display sfarfalla a 25000 Hz (Probabilmente a causa dell'uso di PWM) Flickering rilevato ad una luminosita' di 20 % o inferiore. Non dovrebbe verificarsi flickering o PWM sopra questo valore di luminosita'.

La frequenza di 25000 Hz è abbastanza alta, quindi la maggioranza degli utenti sensibili al PWM non dovrebbero notare alcun flickering.

In confronto: 52 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 9868 (minimo: 43 - massimo: 142900) Hz è stata rilevata.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660Tooltip
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø495 (488.96-585.22)
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø480 (477.83-508.65)
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø441 (424.51-542.46)
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø492 (486.99-523.37)
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø504 (494.08-654.12)
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U; BIOS 204: Ø571 (557.17-647.21)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
173 Points ∼79% +6%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U
163 Points ∼75%
Media Intel Core i5-8265U
  (126 - 163, n=10)
152 Points ∼70% -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U
149 Points ∼68% -9%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼66% -12%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U
139 Points ∼64% -15%
Media della classe Office
  (20 - 180, n=492)
109 Points ∼50% -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U
654 Points ∼15% +12%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U
647 Points ∼15% +11%
Media Intel Core i5-8265U
  (503 - 679, n=11)
609 Points ∼14% +4%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U
585.2 Points ∼13%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
543 Points ∼12% -7%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U
508 Points ∼12% -13%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U
490 Points ∼11% -16%
Media della classe Office
  (36 - 1050, n=495)
323 Points ∼7% -45%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
163 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
585.2 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
56.95 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Aiuto
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Media Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2857 - 3142, n=9)
3012 Points ∼27% +1%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
2992 Points ∼27%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
2915 Points ∼26% -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
2902 Points ∼26% -3%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
2786 Points ∼25% -7%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
2778 Points ∼25% -7%
Media della classe Office
  (320 - 3503, n=111)
2552 Points ∼23% -15%
Productivity
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
7050 Points ∼73% +14%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
6202 Points ∼64%
Media Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5931 - 6556, n=9)
6186 Points ∼64% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
6069 Points ∼63% -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5939 Points ∼61% -4%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
5505 Points ∼57% -11%
Media della classe Office
  (1444 - 7588, n=111)
5427 Points ∼56% -12%
Essentials
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
8493 Points ∼80% +7%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7963 Points ∼75%
Media Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7618 - 8395, n=9)
7912 Points ∼74% -1%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
7767 Points ∼73% -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
7618 Points ∼71% -4%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
7021 Points ∼66% -12%
Media della classe Office
  (2683 - 8992, n=111)
6862 Points ∼64% -14%
Score
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
4006 Points ∼52% +6%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
3790 Points ∼49%
Media Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3643 - 3869, n=9)
3785 Points ∼49% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
3643 Points ∼47% -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
3643 Points ∼47% -4%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3407 Points ∼44% -10%
Media della classe Office
  (803 - 4269, n=112)
3179 Points ∼41% -16%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
4093 Points ∼67% +19%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
3733 Points ∼61% +8%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
3585 Points ∼59% +4%
Media Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3150 - 3780, n=9)
3461 Points ∼57% 0%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
3449 Points ∼57%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3113 Points ∼51% -10%
Media della classe Office
  (1169 - 4458, n=369)
3026 Points ∼50% -12%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3449 punti
Aiuto
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Media Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
 
Media della classe Office
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-62%
-38%
-37%
-35%
6%
-48%
Write 4K
187.2
80.14
-57%
109.6
-41%
93.78
-50%
99.9
-47%
177 (162 - 187, n=3)
-5%
98 (0.217 - 785, n=118)
-48%
Read 4K
51.76
32.05
-38%
41.15
-20%
40.46
-22%
40.03
-23%
50.8 (48.3 - 52.4, n=3)
-2%
32.9 (0.176 - 166, n=118)
-36%
Write Seq
1438
505.4
-65%
746.8
-48%
804.2
-44%
973.1
-32%
1773 (1438 - 2092, n=3)
23%
642 (21.4 - 1895, n=118)
-55%
Read Seq
1347
527.9
-61%
1134
-16%
1677
24%
1111
-18%
1616 (1347 - 1758, n=3)
20%
966 (74 - 2827, n=118)
-28%
Write 4K Q32T1
396.7
204.9
-48%
321.5
-19%
201.8
-49%
424.6
7%
433 (352 - 550, n=3)
9%
263 (0.222 - 701, n=118)
-34%
Read 4K Q32T1
534.4
226.6
-58%
354
-34%
267
-50%
255.9
-52%
560 (498 - 648, n=3)
5%
278 (0.647 - 773, n=118)
-48%
Write Seq Q32T1
3280
532.7
-84%
871.8
-73%
669.3
-80%
1300
-60%
3244 (3216 - 3280, n=3)
-1%
783 (56.5 - 3280, n=118)
-76%
Read Seq Q32T1
3556
550.7
-85%
1639
-54%
2606
-27%
1723
-52%
3470 (3316 - 3556, n=3)
-2%
1556 (78.6 - 3560, n=118)
-56%
AS SSD
-86%
-44%
-62%
-56%
6%
-830%
Copy Game MB/s
699.9
301.11
549.22
982 (787 - 1178, n=2)
278 (17.5 - 1145, n=216)
Copy Program MB/s
327.12
233.52
246.84
381 (243 - 519, n=2)
171 (12.8 - 538, n=216)
Copy ISO MB/s
955.16
868.11
600.52
1738 (1693 - 1782, n=2)
439 (21.1 - 2151, n=216)
Score Total
4379
971
-78%
2384
-46%
1387
-68%
2048
-53%
5186 (4379 - 5862, n=3)
18%
1255 (21 - 4945, n=325)
-71%
Score Write
1902
284
-85%
932
-51%
415
-78%
815
-57%
2238 (1902 - 2503, n=3)
18%
406 (8 - 1945, n=325)
-79%
Score Read
1639
448
-73%
977
-40%
690
-58%
829
-49%
1956 (1639 - 2359, n=3)
19%
567 (6 - 2251, n=325)
-65%
Access Time Write *
0.023
0.046
-100%
0.033
-43%
0.051
-122%
0.028
-22%
0.0273 (0.023 - 0.034, n=3)
-19%
1.179 (0.021 - 34.1, n=353)
-5026%
Access Time Read *
0.046
0.129
-180%
0.06
-30%
0.114
-148%
0.0387 (0.033 - 0.046, n=3)
16%
1.644 (0.028 - 32, n=350)
-3474%
4K-64 Write
1493.75
156.1
-90%
736.88
-51%
271.59
-82%
605.06
-59%
1869 (1494 - 2147, n=3)
25%
260 (0.23 - 1704, n=354)
-83%
4K-64 Read
1314.05
366.77
-72%
788.31
-40%
431.26
-67%
652.98
-50%
1644 (1314 - 2050, n=3)
25%
420 (0.34 - 2072, n=354)
-68%
4K Write
166.01
78.8
-53%
124.83
-25%
88.45
-47%
130.83
-21%
141 (109 - 166, n=3)
-15%
71.6 (0.21 - 182, n=354)
-57%
4K Read
59.02
30.36
-49%
44.27
-25%
38.69
-34%
37.3
-37%
55.6 (50.2 - 59, n=3)
-6%
29 (0.4 - 112, n=354)
-51%
Seq Write
2425.85
493.27
-80%
707.74
-71%
549.75
-77%
794.94
-67%
2288 (2081 - 2426, n=3)
-6%
449 (41.5 - 2426, n=355)
-81%
Seq Read
2660.99
512.88
-81%
1446.39
-46%
2205.34
-17%
1388.77
-48%
2558 (2429 - 2661, n=3)
-4%
769 (42.5 - 2773, n=355)
-71%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-74% / -76%
-41% / -41%
-50% / -51%
-46% / -47%
6% / 6%
-439% / -500%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Sequential Read: 1448 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1429 MB/s
512K Read: 1460 MB/s
512K Write: 1492 MB/s
4K Read: 58.85 MB/s
4K Write: 116.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 311.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 231.8 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1866 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1851 Points ∼99% +1%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1835 Points ∼98%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=132)
1696 Points ∼91% -8%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1672 Points ∼90% -9%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1547 Points ∼83% -16%
Media della classe Office
  (185 - 5107, n=618)
1242 Points ∼67% -32%
3DMark 11 Performance
2042 punti
Aiuto
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
10.82 fps ∼100%
Media della classe Office
  (2.54 - 54.8, n=221)
10.3 fps ∼95% -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
9.9 fps ∼91% -9%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
9.4 fps ∼87% -13%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4.5 - 16, n=112)
8.98 fps ∼83% -17%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
7 fps ∼65% -35%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
4.5 fps ∼42% -58%
1366x768 High Preset
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
33.91 fps ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
33.5 fps ∼99% -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
31 fps ∼91% -9%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (8.1 - 34.5, n=120)
26.6 fps ∼78% -22%
Media della classe Office
  (8.1 - 128, n=316)
26.1 fps ∼77% -23%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
19 fps ∼56% -44%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
8.1 fps ∼24% -76%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
40.46 fps ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
39.9 fps ∼99% -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
36.7 fps ∼91% -9%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (11.5 - 45.5, n=120)
31.9 fps ∼79% -21%
Media della classe Office
  (10.8 - 145, n=336)
30.1 fps ∼74% -26%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
21 fps ∼52% -48%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
11.5 fps ∼28% -72%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
78.49 fps ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
76.5 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
67.4 fps ∼86% -14%
Media Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (18.3 - 81.7, n=120)
59.5 fps ∼76% -24%
Media della classe Office
  (12.2 - 204, n=337)
53.4 fps ∼68% -32%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
47 fps ∼60% -40%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
18.3 fps ∼23% -77%
basso medio alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 78.4940.4633.9110.82fps

Rumorosità

Idle
30.4 / 30.4 / 31.6 dB(A)
Sotto carico
44.8 / 44.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.535.232.333.5254749.935.7473158.56634.958.54035.443.531.535.45032.833.630.932.86334.530.93034.58027.728.225.727.710028.628.524.728.612526.224.925.126.216024.9242424.920025.825.122.125.825025.825.32225.831528.4292128.440026.226.519.726.250027.127.118.727.163028.228.518.928.280030.430.518.130.4100031.632.217.631.6125030.632.117.430.6160029.529.817.329.5200033.63417.533.6250034.434.617.534.4315035.536.117.835.5400035.536.518.135.5500032.53318.432.5630032.232.618.532.2800028.628.918.628.61000024.72518.724.71250022.62318.722.61600020.420.518.920.4SPL44.44530.444.4N4.44.71.24.4median 28.6median 28.9median 18.7median 28.6Delta3.23.71.93.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSchenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Carico massimo
 30.9 °C40.3 °C37.3 °C 
 28.5 °C36.6 °C32.3 °C 
 23.5 °C25.4 °C26.6 °C 
Massima: 40.3 °C
Media: 31.3 °C
41.4 °C45 °C34.8 °C
33.6 °C47.1 °C30.4 °C
23.1 °C25.3 °C23.7 °C
Massima: 47.1 °C
Media: 33.8 °C
Alimentazione (max)  44.1 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 31.3 °C / 88 F, rispetto alla media di 29.4 °C / 85 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Office.
(±) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 40.3 °C / 105 F, rispetto alla media di 33.9 °C / 93 F, che varia da 21.2 a 62.5 °C per questa classe Office.
(-) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 47.1 °C / 117 F, rispetto alla media di 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 23.7 °C / 75 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+1.6 °C / 2.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.632.335.62533.735.733.73138.934.938.9403331.5335032.830.932.86328.33028.38028.525.728.510027.324.727.312526.925.126.916024.62424.620023.522.123.525029.12229.131535.32135.340041.719.741.750044.118.744.163048.618.948.680058.218.158.2100065.917.665.9125064.317.464.3160062.917.362.9200062.617.562.6250055.717.555.7315056.617.856.6400059.218.159.2500059.318.459.3630058.818.558.880005718.6571000050.118.750.11250050.918.750.91600053.118.953.1SPL72.430.472.4N24.91.224.9median 53.1median 18.7median 53.1Delta10.21.910.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker Slim 15-RE-E19Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19 analisi audio

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.89 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz analisi audio

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 3.9 / 0.76 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.2 / 6.5 / 11.3 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 32 / 42.2 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
563 min ∼21% +110%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 53.9 Wh
430 min ∼16% +60%
Media della classe Office
  (105 - 964, n=310)
406 min ∼15% +51%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
391 min ∼15% +46%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
291 min ∼11% +9%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 36 Wh
268 min ∼10%
Autonomia della batteria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4ore 28minuti

Pro

+ buone opzioni di manutenzione
+ buone prestazioni del sistema
+ design moderno
+ Wi-Fi veloce

Contro

- rumoroso sotto carico
- display con scarso contrasto
- pulsanti del mouse molli

Verdict - Good office laptop with minor weaknesses

Recensione: Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19. Modello di test gentilmente fornito da Schenker Technologies.
Recensione: Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19. Modello di test gentilmente fornito da Schenker Technologies.

Lo Schenker Slim 15 RED Edition ha dimostrato di essere un computer portatile con buone prestazioni per diverse applicazioni d'ufficio nella nostra recensione. Il veloce storage SSD combinato con la moderna CPU garantisce buone prestazioni di sistema, mentre la memoria integrata combinata con la GPU integrata offre prestazioni accettabili per i contenuti 3D.

Nella nostra configurazione di test, lo Schenker Slim 15 è stato in grado di fornire buoni risultati. Si dovrebbe tenere d'occhio la configurazione hardware al momento dell'acquisto per ottenere gli stessi punteggi.

Gli acquirenti devono prestare particolare attenzione alla configurazione al momento dell'ordine, poiché una configurazione con meno RAM avrebbe un impatto notevole sulle prestazioni grafiche. Anche l'opzione di archiviazione deve essere presa in considerazione, perché altrimenti le prestazioni del sistema potrebbero avere un impatto significativo. Lo scarso contrasto sul display e la breve durata della batteria sono rimasti gli stessi. Se si riesce a vivere con i punti di forza e anche i punti deboli dello Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19, si ottiene un buon computer portatile da ufficio.

Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19 - 03/08/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Chassis
82 / 98 → 83%
Tastiera
79%
Dispositivo di puntamento
67%
Connettività
61 / 80 → 76%
Peso
69 / 20-67 → 100%
Batteria
78%
Display
79%
Prestazioni di gioco
60 / 68 → 88%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
87 / 92 → 94%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
82%
Audio
50%
Fotocamera
35 / 85 → 42%
Media
71%
81%
Office - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione del Portatile Schenker Slim 15 RED (i5-8265U, UHD620)
Mike Wobker, 2019-03-16 (Update: 2019-03-16)