Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello Smartphone Honor View 10

Florian Wimmer (traduzione a cura di G. De Luca), 02/04/2018

Uno smartphone promettente. Un phablet in nel formato trendy 2:1 che ha delle similitudini con l'Huawei Mate 10 Pro, ma costa molto meno. Questo significa che Huawei ha messo a rischio il suo modello top o ci sono differenze evidenti con il View 10 per considerarlo un vero competitor? Vediamolo insieme.

Honor View 10
Scheda grafica
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
Memoria
6144 MB 
Schermo
5.99 pollici 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, kapazitiver Touchscreen, IPS, lucido: si
Harddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3.5mm-Audioport, Lettore schede: microSD bis 256 GB, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Beschleunigungssensor, Gyroskop, Annäherungssensor, Kompass, USB-OTG, Infrarot
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS, LTE (1,3,5,7,8,20,38,39,40,41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7 x 157 x 75
Batteria
14.25 Wh, 3750 mAh polimeri di litio, SuperCharge (max. 22,5W), Tempo conversazione 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 23 ore, Standby 3G (dichiarata dal produttore): 528 ore
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 16 MPix 16.0MP, f/​1.8, Phasenvergleich-AF, LED-Blitz, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Hauptkamera); 20.0MP, monochrom, Tiefenschärfe (Zweitkamera)
Fotocamera Secondaria: 13 MPix f/2.0
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Mono-Lautsprecher an der Unterkante, Tastiera: virtuelles Keyboard, Schnelllade-Gerät, USB-Kabel, Headset, Bumper, SIM-Tool, Translator, HiCare, PhoneClone, Game Suite, Telefonmanager, Designs, 24 Mesi Garanzia, Dual-LTE, Dual-VoLTE, NPU, Gesichtserkennung, LTE-Geschwindigkeit Download: max. 1.200 Mbit/s, Upload: max. 100 MBit/s; SAR-Wert: 0,77 W/kg (Kopf), 0,99 W/kg (Körper), senza ventola
Peso
172 gr, Alimentazione: 99 gr
Prezzo
499 Euro

 

Honor View 10
Honor View 10
Honor View 10
Honor View 10
Honor View 10
Honor View 10
Honor View 10

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
914 MBit/s ∼100% +357%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼72% +229%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
501 MBit/s ∼55% +151%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼42% +93%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s ∼40% +84%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼37% +69%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
200 MBit/s ∼22%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +215%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼93% +194%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼92% +191%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
494 MBit/s ∼70% +122%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
374 MBit/s ∼53% +68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼32% +1%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
223 MBit/s ∼32%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – loop
GPS Honor View 10 – overview
GPS Honor View 10 – overview
GPS Honor View 10 – path
GPS Honor View 10 – path
GPS Honor View 10 – loop
GPS Honor View 10 – loop

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
540
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 552 cd/m² Media: 523.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.08 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 88 %
Al centro con la batteria: 530 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1514:1 (Nero: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.25
Honor View 10
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
17%
0%
-16%
19%
14%
-51%
Brightness middle
530
629
19%
425
-20%
578
9%
560
6%
559
5%
432
-18%
Brightness
523
636
22%
423
-19%
568
9%
562
7%
538
3%
428
-18%
Brightness Distribution
88
94
7%
92
5%
92
5%
93
6%
90
2%
87
-1%
Black Level *
0.35
0.62
-77%
0.38
-9%
Contrast
1514
932
-38%
1471
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
1.7
29%
2.1
12%
2.8
-17%
1.7
29%
1.3
46%
4.18
-74%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.5
3.6
35%
3.4
38%
5.1
7%
3.4
38%
2.7
51%
8.53
-55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
2.4
-9%
2.5
-14%
2.8
-27%
1.6
27%
1.8
18%
5.3
-141%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.15 102%
2.32 95%
2.15 102%
2.13 103%
2.25 98%
2.33 94%
CCT
6598 99%
6337 103%
6455 101%
6728 97%
6435 101%
6797 96%
7487 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8801 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms Incremento
↘ 17.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
53.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms Incremento
↘ 27.6 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
173653 Points ∼75%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼76% +2%
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points ∼74% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
173403 Points ∼74% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼71% -5%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
218158 Points ∼94% +26%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼75% 0%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
6724 Points ∼65%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼67% +3%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼64% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6433 Points ∼62% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼50% -23%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼54% -17%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
8306 Points ∼79%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼80% +2%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼73% -7%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7695 Points ∼73% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼55% -30%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼65% -17%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
1184 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼71% +4%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼77% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1239 Points ∼72% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼67% -2%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼58% -15%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
3892 Points ∼25%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼23% -6%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼38% +57%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6045 Points ∼38% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼39% +57%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼37% +53%
Memory (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
4276 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼86% -3%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼80% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3444 Points ∼72% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼65% -27%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼44% -51%
System (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
5195 Points ∼43%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼43% +1%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼48% +13%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5857 Points ∼48% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼44% +2%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼35% -18%
Overall (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
3181 Points ∼52%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼52% -1%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼60% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3506 Points ∼58% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼54% +4%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼44% -15%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
9015 Points ∼63%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼59% -5%
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼55% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7881 Points ∼55% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
8295 Points ∼58% -8%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼56% -11%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
6785 Points ∼19%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼19% 0%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼18% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6491 Points ∼18% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼18% -1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
10558 Points ∼29% +56%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼17% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
1918 Points ∼32%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼32% -1%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼33% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1904 Points ∼32% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼34% +5%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
4263 Points ∼72% +122%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼32% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
2931 Points ∼80%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼78% -2%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼84% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1628 Points ∼44% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼67% -16%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2109 Points ∼57% -28%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼80% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
2994 Points ∼56%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼53% -5%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼75% +34%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3723 Points ∼69% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% +16%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3069 Points ∼57% +3%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼72% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
2980 Points ∼63%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼60% -4%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼79% +26%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
2895 Points ∼61% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼67% +7%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2781 Points ∼59% -7%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼77% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
1906 Points ∼52%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼80% +52%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼83% +59%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1574 Points ∼43% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼68% +29%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼77% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
1954 Points ∼24%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼40% +72%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼70% +196%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5107 Points ∼61% +161%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼58% +145%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼71% +202%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
1943 Points ∼30%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼51% +67%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼76% +148%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3407 Points ∼53% +75%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼62% +104%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼74% +144%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
14556 Points ∼18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼29% +55%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼27% +47%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
13800 Points ∼17% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼26% +44%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼32% +76%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼18% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
22429 Points ∼5%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼7% +52%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼12% +159%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
52358 Points ∼11% +133%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% +47%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼24% +406%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼12% +146%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
20022 Points ∼10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼15% +53%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼20% +110%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
32302 Points ∼15% +61%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼14% +46%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼31% +222%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼16% +71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
125 fps ∼7%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼7% -10%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼7% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
109 fps ∼6% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼6% -17%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
166.9 fps ∼10% +34%
LG V30
113 fps ∼7% -10%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
59 fps ∼13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼13% +2%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼13% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
60 fps ∼13% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
119.4 fps ∼26% +102%
LG V30
60 fps ∼13% +2%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
66 fps ∼12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼10% -18%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼11% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
47 fps ∼9% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% -24%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
71 fps ∼13% +8%
LG V30
59 fps ∼11% -11%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
55 fps ∼15%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼15% +2%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼15% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
46 fps ∼13% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10% -31%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
79.2 fps ∼22% +44%
LG V30
35 fps ∼10% -36%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
21 fps ∼4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼7% +76%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼8% +95%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
35 fps ∼6% +67%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼8% +100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
49 fps ∼9% +133%
LG V30
40 fps ∼7% +90%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
36 fps ∼20%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼22% +6%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼21% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
37 fps ∼21% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% -36%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
56.4 fps ∼32% +57%
LG V30
19 fps ∼11% -47%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
21 fps ∼5%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼5% 0%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼6% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
23 fps ∼6% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼6% +19%
LG V30
24 fps ∼6% +14%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
Honor View 10
21 fps ∼18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼19% +5%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼20% +10%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
25 fps ∼21% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼11% -38%
LG V30
13 fps ∼11% -38%

Legenda

 
Honor View 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
223.5 Points ∼100% +541%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼30% +91%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼28% +78%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
61.5 Points ∼28% +76%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼25% +62%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼24% +52%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
34.871 Points ∼16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points ∼100% +423%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼40% +109%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼36% +86%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
10672 Points ∼30% +59%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼30% +56%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼30% +55%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
6729 Points ∼19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
6013 ms * ∼100%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼60% +40%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼60% +40%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
3199 ms * ∼53% +47%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼51% +49%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼37% +63%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
719.7 ms * ∼12% +88%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
362 Points ∼100% +131%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼50% +15%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼44% +1%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
157 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼43% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
149 Points ∼41% -5%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼38% -12%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Honor View 10Huawei Mate 10 ProOnePlus 5TSony Xperia XZ PremiumSamsung Galaxy S8 PlusApple iPhone 8 PlusLG V30
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-25%
-43%
-22%
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
33.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-49%
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
47.2
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
36.79 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-55%
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
62.8
-22%
Random Write 4KB
160
164.45
3%
20
-87%
17.2
-89%
15.27
-90%
10.21
-94%
Random Read 4KB
144.3
132.27
-8%
138.1
-4%
74.1
-49%
127.18
-12%
78.17
-46%
Sequential Write 256KB
194.3
208.72
7%
203.4
5%
194
0%
194.18
0%
193.22
-1%
Sequential Read 256KB
810.3
732.46
-10%
698.7
-14%
687
-15%
787.6
-3%
669.48
-17%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high30 fps
Carico massimo
 37.2 °C36.9 °C35.7 °C 
 37.4 °C37.1 °C36.5 °C 
 36.9 °C36.3 °C36.2 °C 
Massima: 37.4 °C
Media: 36.7 °C
32.6 °C34.1 °C34.7 °C
33.4 °C34.2 °C35 °C
33.4 °C33.9 °C34.6 °C
Massima: 35 °C
Media: 34 °C
Alimentazione (max)  27.6 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.243.12532.931.73137.233.84031.733.85039.6396328.326.38027.328.110026.93012526.729160243920020.948.825020.952.531519.554.540018.559.950017.562.963017.564.280015.763.1100015.865.1125016.666.4160015.873.8200015.474.9250015.57931501677.4400015.876.350001674.3630016.375.5800016.3761000016.275.81250016.466.21600016.450.5SPL28.686.6N1.163.6median 16.4Honor View 10median 65.1Delta2.112.335.237.832.934.237.235.631.737.139.64028.327.927.32626.924.326.723.72433.420.941.220.951.919.551.218.560.317.55617.555.915.755.115.865.716.669.515.874.215.47715.574.91673.315.870.41670.816.373.116.372.916.273.516.468.816.455.828.684.41.154.7median 16.4Huawei Mate 10 Promedian 65.72.110.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Honor View 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.05 / 2.36 / 2.41 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 4.93 / 9.04 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor View 10
3750 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
28%
33%
9%
37%
9%
31%
Idle Minimum *
1.05
0.85
19%
0.58
45%
0.62
41%
0.68
35%
0.72
31%
0.72
31%
Idle Average *
2.36
1.15
51%
1.44
39%
2.44
-3%
1.13
52%
2.45
-4%
1.37
42%
Idle Maximum *
2.41
1.23
49%
1.53
37%
2.59
-7%
1.16
52%
2.52
-5%
1.41
41%
Load Average *
4.93
4.12
16%
3.17
36%
4.94
-0%
4.69
5%
3.84
22%
3.46
30%
Load Maximum *
9.04
8.42
7%
8.54
6%
7.91
12%
5.24
42%
9.02
-0%
7.83
13%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
27ore 51minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11ore 19minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13ore 39minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
5ore 05minuti
Honor View 10
3750 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
17%
-2%
-5%
-4%
-5%
4%
Reader / Idle
1671
1744
4%
1754
5%
1754
5%
1565
-6%
2085
25%
1914
15%
H.264
819
929
13%
799
-2%
802
-2%
742
-9%
733
-11%
822
0%
WiFi v1.3
679
818
20%
718
6%
695
2%
736
8%
657
-3%
774
14%
Load
305
398
30%
257
-16%
236
-23%
275
-10%
211
-31%
267
-12%

Pro

+ case stabile
+ base del display piccola
+ lettore di impronte veloce
+ veloce modem LTE
+ software foto dettagliato
+ fotocamere decenti
+ molte opzioni di input
+ display con contrasto elevato
+ prestazioni high-end
+ spazio di archiviazione veloce
+ temperature del case piuttosto basse

Contro

- modulo ac Wi-Fi lento
- localizzazione GPS non sempre preciso
- occasionale surriscaldamento
- consumi energetici elevati
Recensione Honor View 10. Modello fornito da notebooksbilliger.de
Recensione Honor View 10. Modello fornito da notebooksbilliger.de

L'Honor View 10 è molto trendy con le sue basi sottili e l'ampio display. Considerando che i componenti sono high-end, è economico con un prezzo di poco sotto le £500 (attualmente non è disponibile negli USA) ed è molto interessante per chi è in cerca di un affare. Questo dispositivo ha molto aspetti positivi: il case è stabile, ci sono molte possibilità di input, le casse sono decenti e ci sono un jack audio da 3.5 mm, un veloce modulo LTE, infrarossi, e buone fotocamere che scattano ottime immagini. Le prestazioni sono decenti, ma il dispositivo a volte è limitato dal surriscaldamento. Ma l'Honor View 10 ha anche qualche svantaggio - il lento modulo Wi-Fi, ad esempio, e il GPS impreciso oltre ai consumi elevati.

Performance elevate e prezzo basso: l'Honor View 10 sebbene un po' ridimensionato, potrebbe essere un concorrente dell'Huawei Mate 10 Pro. Se volete risparmiare un bel po' di soldi, ma cercate prestazioni elevate ed una buona fotocamera, non sarete delusi dal View 10. 

Nel complesso, dobbiamo dire che Huawei ha ridotto il suo smartphone nei punti giusti per realizzare un dispositivo in grado di competere negli aspetti fondamentali con i dispositivi più costosi. Se cercate prestazioni elevate ad un prezzo decente, dovete assolutamente dare uno sguardo all'Honor View 10. Sebbene il OnePlus 5T offra un'esperienza ancora migliore.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Honor View 10 - 01/30/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
86%
Tastiera
69 / 75 → 92%
Dispositivo di puntamento
95%
Connettività
44 / 60 → 74%
Peso
90%
Batteria
94%
Display
89%
Prestazioni di gioco
61 / 63 → 96%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
67 / 70 → 96%
Temperatura
92%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Fotocamera
80%
Media
79%
89%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello Smartphone Honor View 10
Florian Wimmer, 2018-02- 4 (Update: 2018-02- 4)