Notebookcheck

Recensione breve dello smartphone OnePlus 5T

Florian Wimmer, 01/05/2018

E' tornato! Solo pochi mesi dopo il lancio del suo predecessore, lo OnePlus ora ha presentato il suo nuovo smartphone. Lo OnePlus 5T ha un moderno formato 2:1 e fotocamere migliorate. Ma ci sono abbastanza modifiche per essere un update convincente?

OnePlus 5T (5 Serie)
Scheda grafica
Memoria
8192 MB 
Schermo
6.01 pollici 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, kapazitiver Bildschirm, AMOLED, 2.5D Corning Gorilla Glass 5, lucido: si
Harddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 111 GB libera
Porte di connessione
1 USB 2.0, Connessioni Audio: 3.5mm, 1 Lettore impronte digitali, NFC, Sensore luminosità, Sensori: Hall, Accelerometer, G-sensor, Kompass, Gyroskop, Annäherung, RGB, Sensor Hub, USB-C
Rete
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B30/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 7.3 x 156.1 x 75
Batteria
12.5 Wh, 3300 mAh ioni di litio, Dash Charge (5V 4A)
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Fotocamera Principale: 16 MPix Dual-Kamera: Sony IMX 398, 1.12μm, f/1.7, Focal: 27.22mm, Dual LED Flash, || 20 MPix IMX 376K, 1.0 μm, f/1.7, Focal: 27.22mm, Video: 4K @ 30fps
Fotocamera Secondaria: 16 MPix Sensor IMX 371, Pixelgröße: 1.0μm, Aperture: f/2.0, 1080p @ 30fps
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: Monolautsprecher an der Unterseite, Tastiera: virtuelles Keyboard, Ladegerät, Ladekabel, Hülle, SIM-Tool, 24 Mesi Garanzia, Bandbreite (Download/​Upload): 600Mbps/​150Mbps (LTE); SAR-Werte: 1,41 W/kg (Körper), 0,51 W/kg (Kopf), senza ventola
Peso
162 gr, Alimentazione: 106 gr
Prezzo
559 Euro

 

OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼100% +70%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
489 MBit/s ∼74% +27%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼59%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼56% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s ∼56% -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼51% -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s ∼36% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼93% +1%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼92%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼77% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s ∼71% -23%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s ∼47% -49%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s ∼40% -57%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop
GPS OnePlus 5T - overview
GPS OnePlus 5T - overview
GPS OnePlus 5T - path
GPS OnePlus 5T - path
GPS OnePlus 5T - loop
GPS OnePlus 5T - loop

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click per caricare le immagini
402
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 439 cd/m² Media: 423.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 92 %
Al centro con la batteria: 425 cd/m²
Contrasto: ∞:1 (Nero: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.32
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Sony Xperia XZ1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Google Pixel 2 XL
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-23%
-47%
-16%
-61%
20%
6%
Brightness middle
425
620
46%
656
54%
415
-2%
432
2%
560
32%
426
0%
Brightness
423
610
44%
634
50%
420
-1%
428
1%
562
33%
431
2%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
93
1%
87
-5%
87
-5%
93
1%
93
1%
Black Level *
0.79
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.1
4.2
-100%
5.3
-152%
2.7
-29%
4.18
-99%
1.7
19%
1.6
24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.4
5.8
-71%
7.8
-129%
4.3
-26%
8.53
-151%
3.4
-0%
4.1
-21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
3.9
-56%
5.2
-108%
3.3
-32%
5.3
-112%
1.6
36%
1.7
32%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.02 109%
2.22 99%
2.36 93%
2.33 94%
2.13 103%
2.25 98%
CCT
6455 101%
7086 92%
7905 82%
6787 96%
7487 87%
6435 101%
6329 103%
Contrast
785
1640
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato 242.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8801 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms Incremento
↘ 2 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms Incremento
↘ 2.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points ∼74%
Sony Xperia XZ1
167748 Points ∼72% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points ∼29% -60%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points ∼71% -3%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼75% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼71% -4%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼76% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼76% +3%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼64%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6443 Points ∼62% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points ∼49% -23%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points ∼68% +6%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼54% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼50% -21%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼67% +5%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7056 Points ∼67% -9%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points ∼59% -19%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points ∼78% +7%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼65% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼55% -25%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼74% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼80% +9%
BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼77%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1181 Points ∼68% -11%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points ∼44% -42%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points ∼69% -11%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼58% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼67% -12%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼74% -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼71% -7%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼38%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5923 Points ∼37% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points ∼9% -75%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points ∼39% +1%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼37% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼39% 0%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼39% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼23% -40%
Memory (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1752 Points ∼37% -54%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points ∼29% -64%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points ∼61% -24%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼44% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼65% -18%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼92% +15%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼86% +8%
System (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼48%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5840 Points ∼48% -1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points ∼27% -43%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points ∼48% +1%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼35% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼44% -9%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼48% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼43% -11%
Overall (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2909 Points ∼48% -21%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points ∼25% -59%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points ∼55% -9%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼44% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼54% -10%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼62% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼52% -14%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼55%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7979 Points ∼55% 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points ∼27% -51%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points ∼52% -5%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼56% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
8295 Points ∼58% +4%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼56% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼59% +7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼18%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6493 Points ∼18% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points ∼12% -37%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points ∼17% -6%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼17% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼18% 0%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼19% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼19% +2%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼33%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1856 Points ∼31% -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points ∼15% -56%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points ∼32% -2%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼32% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼34% +3%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼32% -3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼84%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2928 Points ∼80% -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points ∼48% -43%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points ∼83% -1%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼80% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼67% -20%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼82% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼78% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼75%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3961 Points ∼74% -1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points ∼13% -82%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points ∼72% -4%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼72% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% -13%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% -6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼53% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼79%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3673 Points ∼78% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points ∼18% -78%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points ∼77% -3%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼67% -15%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼75% -5%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼60% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼83%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2564 Points ∼70% -15%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points ∼49% -41%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points ∼82% -1%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼77% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼68% -19%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼83% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼80% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼70%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6057 Points ∼73% +5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points ∼16% -78%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points ∼70% +1%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼71% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼58% -17%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼57% -18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼40% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia XZ1
4649 Points ∼73% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points ∼22% -71%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points ∼76% 0%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼74% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼62% -18%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼66% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼51% -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼27%
Sony Xperia XZ1
23046 Points ∼29% +8%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points ∼16% -39%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points ∼26% -5%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼18% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼26% -2%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼25% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼29% +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼12%
Sony Xperia XZ1
47857 Points ∼10% -18%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points ∼4% -68%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points ∼11% -7%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼12% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% -43%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼12% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼7% -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ1
31618 Points ∼15% -25%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points ∼8% -60%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points ∼19% -6%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼16% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼14% -30%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼19% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼15% -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼7%
Sony Xperia XZ1
111 fps ∼6% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps ∼2% -73%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps ∼7% -1%
LG V30
113 fps ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼6% -8%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼7% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼7% -1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼13%
Sony Xperia XZ1
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps ∼6% -52%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼13% -2%
LG V30
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% -3%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼13% 0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼11%
Sony Xperia XZ1
56 fps ∼10% -7%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼3% -77%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼11% -2%
LG V30
59 fps ∼11% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% -17%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼10% -10%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼15%
Sony Xperia XZ1
52 fps ∼14% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼4% -74%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps ∼10% -34%
LG V30
35 fps ∼10% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10% -28%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15% +6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼15% +6%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼8%
Sony Xperia XZ1
41 fps ∼8% 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps ∼2% -76%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps ∼8% 0%
LG V30
40 fps ∼7% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼8% +2%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼8% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼7% -10%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼21%
Sony Xperia XZ1
42 fps ∼24% +14%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps ∼5% -74%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps ∼11% -46%
LG V30
19 fps ∼11% -49%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% -38%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼23% +11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼22% +3%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼6%
Sony Xperia XZ1
24 fps ∼6% -4%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼1% -79%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps ∼6% -4%
LG V30
24 fps ∼6% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼6% 0%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼6% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼5% -16%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ1
25 fps ∼21% +9%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼5% -77%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps ∼11% -43%
LG V30
13 fps ∼11% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼11% -43%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼21% +9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼19% -4%

Legenda

 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼93%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.709 Points ∼90% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼87% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
61.335 Points ∼86% -8%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼79% -15%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼74% -20%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points ∼39% -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼100% +12%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼89%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼85% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points ∼80% -10%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼75% -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼74% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
10096 Points ∼72% -19%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points ∼31% -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * ∼100% -204%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼39% -17%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼38% -16%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434.1 ms * ∼36% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
3267.9 ms * ∼35% -6%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼33%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼28% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼24% +28%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼93%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
170 Points ∼88% -6%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼83% -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼81% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼79% -15%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼71% -24%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points ∼49% -48%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

OnePlus 5TSony Xperia XZ1Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLGoogle Pixel 2 XLLG V30Samsung Galaxy S8 PlusOnePlus 5
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
-43%
4%
-25%
-6%
1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
47.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.2
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.8
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Random Write 4KB
20
14.93
-25%
7.59
-62%
17.84
-11%
10.21
-49%
15.27
-24%
19.3
-3%
Random Read 4KB
138.1
156.61
13%
68.57
-50%
170.55
23%
78.17
-43%
127.18
-8%
141
2%
Sequential Write 256KB
203.4
204.43
1%
205.27
1%
195.26
-4%
193.22
-5%
194.18
-5%
201.5
-1%
Sequential Read 256KB
698.7
679.13
-3%
287.38
-59%
760.14
9%
669.48
-4%
787.6
13%
748
7%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettaggiValore
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettaggiValore
 high60 fps
Carico massimo
 36 °C35.1 °C32.2 °C 
 36.1 °C36 °C32.1 °C 
 35.4 °C34.8 °C31.7 °C 
Massima: 36.1 °C
Media: 34.4 °C
31.7 °C31.6 °C33.1 °C
31.6 °C32.1 °C33.6 °C
31.4 °C32.7 °C33.7 °C
Massima: 33.7 °C
Media: 32.4 °C
Alimentazione (max)  25.7 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.240.72532.946.33137.244.44031.748.65039.648.96328.337.68027.329.910026.933.712526.732.91602445.520020.955.325020.956.631519.559.140018.568.450017.564.963017.567.480015.766.2100015.870125016.672.7160015.873.8200015.474.4250015.575.931501679.3400015.87850001671.8630016.371.5800016.371.41000016.272.41250016.464.71600016.446.3SPL28.686.3N1.165.5median 16.4OnePlus 5Tmedian 68.4Delta2.18.431.629.825.433.525.327.532.925.333.634.931.627.428.427.22727.320.828.12241.121.347.920.852.421.258.719.462.519.565.417.76817.969.717.873.517.376.517.475.416.778.717.278.718.279.917.980.517.673.517.774.317.873.817.975.918.170.818.253.13087.81.374.1median 17.9OnePlus 5median 70.81.310.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
OnePlus 5T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.58 / 1.44 / 1.53 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 3.17 / 8.54 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-46%
-36%
-38%
-2%
4%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
0.58
0.51
12%
0.84
-45%
1.28
-121%
0.72
-24%
0.68
-17%
0.73
-26%
Idle Average *
1.44
2.16
-50%
2.31
-60%
1.87
-30%
1.37
5%
1.13
22%
1.44
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.53
2.23
-46%
2.33
-52%
1.89
-24%
1.41
8%
1.16
24%
1.5
2%
Load Average *
3.17
7.45
-135%
4.76
-50%
3.73
-18%
3.46
-9%
4.69
-48%
6.91
-118%
Load Maximum *
8.54
9.28
-9%
6.39
25%
8.08
5%
7.83
8%
5.24
39%
8.51
-0%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
29ore 14minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11ore 58minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13ore 19minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
4ore 17minuti
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Autonomia della batteria
-21%
-7%
-5%
6%
-2%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1754
1612
-8%
1665
-5%
1706
-3%
1914
9%
1565
-11%
1534
-13%
H.264
799
580
-27%
698
-13%
672
-16%
822
3%
742
-7%
623
-22%
WiFi v1.3
718
601
-16%
562
-22%
581
-19%
774
8%
736
3%
518
-28%
Load
257
172
-33%
286
11%
302
18%
267
4%
275
7%
247
-4%

Pro

+ case in metallo molto stabile
+ ampia gamma di bande LTE
+ veloce Wi-Fi
+ veloce memoria UFS-2.1
+ prestazioni molto elevate
+ schermo con colori precisi
+ software aggiornato
+ precise GPS
+ qualità di chiamata pulita
+ opzione per il tema dello schermo scuro
+ fotocamere molto buone
+ consumi piuttosto bassi
+ ampia autonomia
+ switch fisico per le notifiche
+ casse buone

Contro

- piuttosto pesante
- manca lo slot microSD
- il microfono distorce un po' il suono
- colore velato ad angolazioni ampie
- non è resistente ad acqua e polvere
- si scalda con carichi estremi
- perdita di prestazione minima con carichi di lavoro elevati
Recensione: OnePlus 5T. Modello fornito da OnePlus.
Recensione: OnePlus 5T. Modello fornito da OnePlus.

Il OnePlus 5T è un ottimo smartphone per spendaccioni intelligenti. Un buon prezzo, consumi contenuti e un ottimo rapporto prezzo-prestazioni. Il OnePlus 5T attualmente è uno degli smartphones più veloci a disposizione ed offre anche una ampia autonomia, buone casse ed eccellenti fotocamere. Ma i dispositivi ammiraglia dei grandi produttori ancora offrano fotocamere migliori: il nostro dispositivo non ha uno stabilizzatore ottico dell'immagine, ad esempio. Le velocità LTE del OnePlus 5T non sono elevate quanto quelle di altri smartphones, ma difficilmente lo noterete. Il software non occupa molto spazio ed è ben realizzato dal produttore. Lo smartphone dovrebbe ricevere in tutto il mondo e la velocità Wi-Fi è molto buona. Il GPS è preciso, il sensore di impronte è affidabile ed il riconoscimento del volto è utile.

Il dispositivo ha uno spazio di archiviazione veloce di ben 128 GB - tuttavia, non può essere aumentato tramite scheda microSD. Utilizzo comodo, display definito con colori forti, e temperature accettabili completano il tutto. Anche gli amanti del predecessore penseranno ad un update: vi darà casse leggermente migliori, fotocamere migliorate e una autonomia nettamente maggiore. Oltre ovviamente, ad un design moderno con basi sottili.

Il produttore è riuscito a creare uno smartphone high-end con poche pecche e maggiori punti di forza rispetto alle poche deficienze del predecessore. Ampia autonomia, fotocamere buone, prestazioni elevate e suono potente il tutto rende attraente questo smartphone.

Sebbene il OnePlus 5T non sia abbastanza bezel-free o sottile come il Galaxy S8+, il OnePlus 5T è un ottimo sviluppo rispetto al predecessore e fino ad ora non ha fatto passi falsi (diversamente dal OnePlus 5 quando fu lanciatao). Quindi in definitiva possiamo affermare: il killer delle ammiraglie è tornato!

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

OnePlus 5T - 01/03/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
91%
Tastiera
67 / 75 → 90%
Dispositivo di puntamento
96%
Connettività
53 / 60 → 88%
Peso
91%
Batteria
94%
Display
89%
Prestazioni di gioco
64 / 63 → 100%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
68 / 70 → 98%
Temperatura
93%
Rumorosità
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Fotocamera
85%
Media
82%
91%
Smartphone - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve dello smartphone OnePlus 5T
Florian Wimmer, 2018-01- 5 (Update: 2018-01- 5)