Recensione breve dello smartphone OnePlus 5T

Name: Recensione breve dello smartphone OnePlus 5T
Item: OnePlus 5T
Rating: 91
Author: Florian Wimmer

Florian Wimmer, 01/05/2018

E' tornato! Solo pochi mesi dopo il lancio del suo predecessore, lo OnePlus ora ha presentato il suo nuovo smartphone. Lo OnePlus 5T ha un moderno formato 2:1 e fotocamere migliorate. Ma ci sono abbastanza modifiche per essere un update convincente?

Dispositivo di test fornito da OnePlus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

I nostri Top 10
» Top 10 Portatili Multimedia
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming
» Top 10 Portatili Gaming Leggeri
» Top 10 Portatili da Ufficio e Business economici
» Top 10 Portatili Premium da Ufficio/Business
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 300 Euro
» Top 10 Portatili sotto i 500 Euro
» Top 10 dei Portatili Workstation
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibili
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Smartphones

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30 Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	657 MBit/s ∼100% +70%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	489 MBit/s ∼74% +27%
OnePlus 5T Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	386 MBit/s ∼59%
OnePlus 5 Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	371 MBit/s ∼56% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	368 MBit/s ∼56% -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	334 MBit/s ∼51% -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	239 MBit/s ∼36% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30 Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	703 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	656 MBit/s ∼93% +1%
OnePlus 5T Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 MBit/s ∼92%
OnePlus 5 Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	539 MBit/s ∼77% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	500 MBit/s ∼71% -23%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	329 MBit/s ∼47% -49%
Google Pixel 2 XL Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	279 MBit/s ∼40% -57%

Confronto immagini

Scegliete una scena e navigate nella prima immagine. Un click cambia lo zoom. Un click sulla immagine zoommata apre quella originale in una nuova finestra. La prima immagine mostra la fotografia ridimensionata del dispositivo di test.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click per caricare le immagini

click per caricare le immagini

click per caricare le immagini


402 cd/m²	420 cd/m²	434 cd/m²
407 cd/m²	425 cd/m²	434 cd/m²
416 cd/m²	431 cd/m²	439 cd/m²

Distribuzione della luminosità

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Massima: 439 cd/m² Media: 423.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 92 %
Al centro con la batteria: 425 cd/m²
Contrasto: ∞:1 (Nero: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.32

	OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01	Sony Xperia XZ1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2	Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5	Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6	LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2	OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen		-23%	-47%	-16%	-61%	20%	6%
Brightness middle	425	620 46%	656 54%	415 -2%	432 2%	560 32%	426 0%
Brightness	423	610 44%	634 50%	420 -1%	428 1%	562 33%	431 2%
Brightness Distribution	92	93 1%	93 1%	87 -5%	87 -5%	93 1%	93 1%
Black Level *		0.79	0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.1	4.2 -100%	5.3 -152%	2.7 -29%	4.18 -99%	1.7 19%	1.6 24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	3.4	5.8 -71%	7.8 -129%	4.3 -26%	8.53 -151%	3.4 -0%	4.1 -21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.5	3.9 -56%	5.2 -108%	3.3 -32%	5.3 -112%	1.6 36%	1.7 32%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.02 ^109%	2.22 ^99%	2.36 ^93%	2.33 ^94%	2.13 ^103%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6455 ^101%	7086 ^92%	7905 ^82%	6787 ^96%	7487 ^87%	6435 ^101%	6329 ^103%
Contrast		785	1640
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)						81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)						99.87

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

flickering dello schermo / PWM rilevato

242.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8801 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Tempi di risposta del Display

ℹ

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.

↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms Incremento
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms Incremento
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo ha mostrato valori di risposta molto veloci nei nostri tests ed è molto adatto per i gaming veloce. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	172124 Points ∼74%
Sony Xperia XZ1	167748 Points ∼72% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	68282 Points ∼29% -60%
Google Pixel 2 XL	166151 Points ∼71% -3%
LG V30	173749 Points ∼75% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	165382 Points ∼71% -4%
OnePlus 5	177156 Points ∼76% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	177341 Points ∼76% +3%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	6595 Points ∼64%
Sony Xperia XZ1	6443 Points ∼62% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	5085 Points ∼49% -23%
Google Pixel 2 XL	6994 Points ∼68% +6%
LG V30	5603 Points ∼54% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5195 Points ∼50% -21%
OnePlus 5	6579 Points ∼64% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	6932 Points ∼67% +5%
Work performance score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	7739 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia XZ1	7056 Points ∼67% -9%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	6264 Points ∼59% -19%
Google Pixel 2 XL	8258 Points ∼78% +7%
LG V30	6854 Points ∼65% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5830 Points ∼55% -25%
OnePlus 5	7826 Points ∼74% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	8439 Points ∼80% +9%

BaseMark OS II
Web (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	1329 Points ∼77%
Sony Xperia XZ1	1181 Points ∼68% -11%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	766 Points ∼44% -42%
Google Pixel 2 XL	1186 Points ∼69% -11%
LG V30	1009 Points ∼58% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1163 Points ∼67% -12%
OnePlus 5	1287 Points ∼74% -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	1234 Points ∼71% -7%
Graphics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	6100 Points ∼38%
Sony Xperia XZ1	5923 Points ∼37% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	1496 Points ∼9% -75%
Google Pixel 2 XL	6142 Points ∼39% +1%
LG V30	5949 Points ∼37% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6126 Points ∼39% 0%
OnePlus 5	6144 Points ∼39% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	3657 Points ∼23% -40%
Memory (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	3845 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ1	1752 Points ∼37% -54%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	1380 Points ∼29% -64%
Google Pixel 2 XL	2927 Points ∼61% -24%
LG V30	2091 Points ∼44% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3135 Points ∼65% -18%
OnePlus 5	4423 Points ∼92% +15%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	4142 Points ∼86% +8%
System (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	5872 Points ∼48%
Sony Xperia XZ1	5840 Points ∼48% -1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	3319 Points ∼27% -43%
Google Pixel 2 XL	5914 Points ∼48% +1%
LG V30	4238 Points ∼35% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5319 Points ∼44% -9%
OnePlus 5	5902 Points ∼48% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	5244 Points ∼43% -11%
Overall (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	3678 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia XZ1	2909 Points ∼48% -21%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	1513 Points ∼25% -59%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3351 Points ∼55% -9%
LG V30	2702 Points ∼44% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3301 Points ∼54% -10%
OnePlus 5	3790 Points ∼62% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	3147 Points ∼52% -14%

Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	8000 Points ∼55%
Sony Xperia XZ1	7979 Points ∼55% 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	3942 Points ∼27% -51%
Google Pixel 2 XL	7568 Points ∼52% -5%
LG V30	8016 Points ∼56% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	8295 Points ∼58% +4%
OnePlus 5	8005 Points ∼56% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	8572 Points ∼59% +7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	6670 Points ∼18%
Sony Xperia XZ1	6493 Points ∼18% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	4172 Points ∼12% -37%
Google Pixel 2 XL	6253 Points ∼17% -6%
LG V30	6078 Points ∼17% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6695 Points ∼18% 0%
OnePlus 5	6799 Points ∼19% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	6792 Points ∼19% +2%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	1962 Points ∼33%
Sony Xperia XZ1	1856 Points ∼31% -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	865 Points ∼15% -56%
Google Pixel 2 XL	1916 Points ∼32% -2%
LG V30	1900 Points ∼32% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2015 Points ∼34% +3%
OnePlus 5	1973 Points ∼33% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	1898 Points ∼32% -3%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	3068 Points ∼84%
Sony Xperia XZ1	2928 Points ∼80% -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	1751 Points ∼48% -43%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3028 Points ∼83% -1%
LG V30	2931 Points ∼80% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2466 Points ∼67% -20%
OnePlus 5	3026 Points ∼82% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	2871 Points ∼78% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	4016 Points ∼75%
Sony Xperia XZ1	3961 Points ∼74% -1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	726 Points ∼13% -82%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3872 Points ∼72% -4%
LG V30	3903 Points ∼72% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3479 Points ∼65% -13%
OnePlus 5	3757 Points ∼70% -6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	2844 Points ∼53% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	3758 Points ∼79%
Sony Xperia XZ1	3673 Points ∼78% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	835 Points ∼18% -78%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3646 Points ∼77% -3%
LG V30	3635 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3188 Points ∼67% -15%
OnePlus 5	3566 Points ∼75% -5%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	2850 Points ∼60% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	3031 Points ∼83%
Sony Xperia XZ1	2564 Points ∼70% -15%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	1785 Points ∼49% -41%
Google Pixel 2 XL	2995 Points ∼82% -1%
LG V30	2808 Points ∼77% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2465 Points ∼68% -19%
OnePlus 5	3012 Points ∼83% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	2896 Points ∼80% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	5791 Points ∼70%
Sony Xperia XZ1	6057 Points ∼73% +5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	1289 Points ∼16% -78%
Google Pixel 2 XL	5856 Points ∼70% +1%
LG V30	5895 Points ∼71% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	4786 Points ∼58% -17%
OnePlus 5	4765 Points ∼57% -18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	3353 Points ∼40% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	4816 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia XZ1	4649 Points ∼73% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	1374 Points ∼22% -71%
Google Pixel 2 XL	4831 Points ∼76% 0%
LG V30	4738 Points ∼74% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3958 Points ∼62% -18%
OnePlus 5	4219 Points ∼66% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	3239 Points ∼51% -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	21348 Points ∼27%
Sony Xperia XZ1	23046 Points ∼29% +8%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	13014 Points ∼16% -39%
Google Pixel 2 XL	20233 Points ∼26% -5%
LG V30	14601 Points ∼18% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	20892 Points ∼26% -2%
OnePlus 5	19411 Points ∼25% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	22629 Points ∼29% +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	58097 Points ∼12%
Sony Xperia XZ1	47857 Points ∼10% -18%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	18386 Points ∼4% -68%
Google Pixel 2 XL	54156 Points ∼11% -7%
LG V30	55271 Points ∼12% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	33077 Points ∼7% -43%
OnePlus 5	58001 Points ∼12% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	34008 Points ∼7% -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	42022 Points ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ1	31618 Points ∼15% -25%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	16841 Points ∼8% -60%
Google Pixel 2 XL	39456 Points ∼19% -6%
LG V30	34139 Points ∼16% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	29282 Points ∼14% -30%
OnePlus 5	40229 Points ∼19% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	30590 Points ∼15% -27%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	113 fps ∼7%
Sony Xperia XZ1	111 fps ∼6% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	30 fps ∼2% -73%
Google Pixel 2 XL	112 fps ∼7% -1%
LG V30	113 fps ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	104 fps ∼6% -8%
OnePlus 5	115 fps ∼7% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	112 fps ∼7% -1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	60 fps ∼13%
Sony Xperia XZ1	60 fps ∼13% 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	29 fps ∼6% -52%
Google Pixel 2 XL	59 fps ∼13% -2%
LG V30	60 fps ∼13% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	58 fps ∼13% -3%
OnePlus 5	60 fps ∼13% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	60 fps ∼13% 0%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	60 fps ∼11%
Sony Xperia XZ1	56 fps ∼10% -7%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	14 fps ∼3% -77%
Google Pixel 2 XL	59 fps ∼11% -2%
LG V30	59 fps ∼11% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	50 fps ∼9% -17%
OnePlus 5	61 fps ∼11% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	54 fps ∼10% -10%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	53 fps ∼15%
Sony Xperia XZ1	52 fps ∼14% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	14 fps ∼4% -74%
Google Pixel 2 XL	35 fps ∼10% -34%
LG V30	35 fps ∼10% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	38 fps ∼10% -28%
OnePlus 5	56 fps ∼15% +6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	56 fps ∼15% +6%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	41 fps ∼8%
Sony Xperia XZ1	41 fps ∼8% 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	9.7 fps ∼2% -76%
Google Pixel 2 XL	41 fps ∼8% 0%
LG V30	40 fps ∼7% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	42 fps ∼8% +2%
OnePlus 5	42 fps ∼8% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	37 fps ∼7% -10%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	37 fps ∼21%
Sony Xperia XZ1	42 fps ∼24% +14%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	9.5 fps ∼5% -74%
Google Pixel 2 XL	20 fps ∼11% -46%
LG V30	19 fps ∼11% -49%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	23 fps ∼13% -38%
OnePlus 5	41 fps ∼23% +11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	38 fps ∼22% +3%

GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	25 fps ∼6%
Sony Xperia XZ1	24 fps ∼6% -4%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	5.3 fps ∼1% -79%
Google Pixel 2 XL	24 fps ∼6% -4%
LG V30	24 fps ∼6% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	25 fps ∼6% 0%
OnePlus 5	25 fps ∼6% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	21 fps ∼5% -16%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordina per valore)
OnePlus 5T	23 fps ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ1	25 fps ∼21% +9%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	5.3 fps ∼5% -77%
Google Pixel 2 XL	13 fps ∼11% -43%
LG V30	13 fps ∼11% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	13 fps ∼11% -43%
OnePlus 5	25 fps ∼21% +9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	22 fps ∼19% -4%

Legenda

OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	71.6 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	66.477 Points ∼93%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	64.709 Points ∼90% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	62.198 Points ∼87% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)	61.335 Points ∼86% -8%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)	56.63 Points ∼79% -15%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	52.9 Points ∼74% -20%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)	28.09 Points ∼39% -58%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	14050 Points ∼100% +12%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	12509 Points ∼89%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	11945 Points ∼85% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	11308 Points ∼80% -10%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	10506 Points ∼75% -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)	10406 Points ∼74% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)	10096 Points ∼72% -19%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)	4398 Points ∼31% -65%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)	9425 ms * ∼100% -204%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	3630 ms * ∼39% -17%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)	3590.6 ms * ∼38% -16%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	3434.1 ms * ∼36% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)	3267.9 ms * ∼35% -6%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	3096 ms * ∼33%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	2621.7 ms * ∼28% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	2236.7 ms * ∼24% +28%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	194 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	181 Points ∼93%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)	170 Points ∼88% -6%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	161 Points ∼83% -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)	158 Points ∼81% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	154 Points ∼79% -15%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	138 Points ∼71% -24%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)	95 Points ∼49% -48%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

	OnePlus 5T	Sony Xperia XZ1	Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL	Google Pixel 2 XL	LG V30	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	OnePlus 5
AndroBench 3-5		-4%	-43%	4%	-25%	-6%	1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		47.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	66.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		47.2	57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		65.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	86.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		62.8	71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Random Write 4KB	20	14.93 -25%	7.59 -62%	17.84 -11%	10.21 -49%	15.27 -24%	19.3 -3%
Random Read 4KB	138.1	156.61 13%	68.57 -50%	170.55 23%	78.17 -43%	127.18 -8%	141 2%
Sequential Write 256KB	203.4	204.43 1%	205.27 1%	195.26 -4%	193.22 -5%	194.18 -5%	201.5 -1%
Sequential Read 256KB	698.7	679.13 -3%	287.38 -59%	760.14 9%	669.48 -4%	787.6 13%	748 7%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settaggi	Valore
	high	30 fps
	very low	30 fps

... in confronto

Dead Trigger 2
	Settaggi	Valore
	high	60 fps

... in confronto

Carico massimo

Idle


36 °C	35.1 °C	32.2 °C
36.1 °C	36 °C	32.1 °C
35.4 °C	34.8 °C	31.7 °C

Massima: 36.1 °C
Media: 34.4 °C


31.7 °C	31.6 °C	33.1 °C
31.6 °C	32.1 °C	33.6 °C
31.4 °C	32.7 °C	33.7 °C

Massima: 33.7 °C
Media: 32.4 °C

Alimentazione (max) 25.7 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

OnePlus 5T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.58 / 1.44 / 1.53 Watt
Sotto carico	3.17 / 8.54 Watt


Leggenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh	Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh	Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh	LG V30 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh	OnePlus 5 3300 mAh
Power Consumption		-46%	-36%	-38%	-2%	4%	-28%
Idle Minimum *	0.58	0.51 12%	0.84 -45%	1.28 -121%	0.72 -24%	0.68 -17%	0.73 -26%
Idle Average *	1.44	2.16 -50%	2.31 -60%	1.87 -30%	1.37 5%	1.13 22%	1.44 -0%
Idle Maximum *	1.53	2.23 -46%	2.33 -52%	1.89 -24%	1.41 8%	1.16 24%	1.5 2%
Load Average *	3.17	7.45 -135%	4.76 -50%	3.73 -18%	3.46 -9%	4.69 -48%	6.91 -118%
Load Maximum *	8.54	9.28 -9%	6.39 25%	8.08 5%	7.83 8%	5.24 39%	8.51 -0%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria

Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)		29ore 14minuti
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		11ore 58minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13ore 19minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)		4ore 17minuti

	OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh	Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh	Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh	LG V30 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh	OnePlus 5 3300 mAh
Autonomia della batteria		-21%	-7%	-5%	6%	-2%	-17%
Reader / Idle	1754	1612 -8%	1665 -5%	1706 -3%	1914 9%	1565 -11%	1534 -13%
H.264	799	580 -27%	698 -13%	672 -16%	822 3%	742 -7%	623 -22%
WiFi v1.3	718	601 -16%	562 -22%	581 -19%	774 8%	736 3%	518 -28%
Load	257	172 -33%	286 11%	302 18%	267 4%	275 7%	247 -4%

Pro

+ case in metallo molto stabile

+ ampia gamma di bande LTE

+ veloce Wi-Fi

+ veloce memoria UFS-2.1

+ prestazioni molto elevate

+ schermo con colori precisi

+ software aggiornato

+ precise GPS

+ qualità di chiamata pulita

+ opzione per il tema dello schermo scuro

+ fotocamere molto buone

+ consumi piuttosto bassi

+ ampia autonomia

+ switch fisico per le notifiche

+ casse buone

Contro

- piuttosto pesante

- manca lo slot microSD

- il microfono distorce un po' il suono

- colore velato ad angolazioni ampie

- non è resistente ad acqua e polvere

- si scalda con carichi estremi

- perdita di prestazione minima con carichi di lavoro elevati

Recensione: OnePlus 5T. Modello fornito da OnePlus.

Il OnePlus 5T è un ottimo smartphone per spendaccioni intelligenti. Un buon prezzo, consumi contenuti e un ottimo rapporto prezzo-prestazioni. Il OnePlus 5T attualmente è uno degli smartphones più veloci a disposizione ed offre anche una ampia autonomia, buone casse ed eccellenti fotocamere. Ma i dispositivi ammiraglia dei grandi produttori ancora offrano fotocamere migliori: il nostro dispositivo non ha uno stabilizzatore ottico dell'immagine, ad esempio. Le velocità LTE del OnePlus 5T non sono elevate quanto quelle di altri smartphones, ma difficilmente lo noterete. Il software non occupa molto spazio ed è ben realizzato dal produttore. Lo smartphone dovrebbe ricevere in tutto il mondo e la velocità Wi-Fi è molto buona. Il GPS è preciso, il sensore di impronte è affidabile ed il riconoscimento del volto è utile.

Il dispositivo ha uno spazio di archiviazione veloce di ben 128 GB - tuttavia, non può essere aumentato tramite scheda microSD. Utilizzo comodo, display definito con colori forti, e temperature accettabili completano il tutto. Anche gli amanti del predecessore penseranno ad un update: vi darà casse leggermente migliori, fotocamere migliorate e una autonomia nettamente maggiore. Oltre ovviamente, ad un design moderno con basi sottili.

Il produttore è riuscito a creare uno smartphone high-end con poche pecche e maggiori punti di forza rispetto alle poche deficienze del predecessore. Ampia autonomia, fotocamere buone, prestazioni elevate e suono potente il tutto rende attraente questo smartphone.

Sebbene il OnePlus 5T non sia abbastanza bezel-free o sottile come il Galaxy S8+, il OnePlus 5T è un ottimo sviluppo rispetto al predecessore e fino ad ora non ha fatto passi falsi (diversamente dal OnePlus 5 quando fu lanciatao). Quindi in definitiva possiamo affermare: il killer delle ammiraglie è tornato!

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

OnePlus 5T - 2018-01-0301/03/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis

91%

Tastiera

67 / 75 → 90%

Dispositivo di puntamento

96%

Connettività

53 / 60 → 88%

Peso

91%

Batteria

94%

Display

89%

Prestazioni di gioco

64 / 63 → 100%

Prestazioni Applicazioni

68 / 70 → 98%

Temperatura

93%

Rumorosità

100%

Audio

69 / 91 → 76%

Fotocamera

85%

Media

82%

91%

Smartphone - Media ponderata

Recensione breve dello smartphone OnePlus 5T

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Tempi di risposta del Display

OnePlus 5T audio analysis

OnePlus 5 audio analysis

Pro

Contro

Pricecompare