Notebookcheck

Recensione breve del Portatile HP Omen 17 (i7-6700HQ, GTX 1070)

Sebastian Bade (traduzione a cura di G.DeLuca), 11/06/2016

Omen incontra Pascal. Dopo che altri produttori di portatili high-end hanno già usato sui loro sistemi l'ultima generazione di GPU Nvidia, anche HP li segue con la serie Omen e la lancia ad un prezzo interessante. Ma è giusto il rapporto prezzo-prestazioni? Vediamolo insieme.

HP Omen 17-w110ng (Omen Serie)
Processore
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1443 MHz, Memoria: 4000 MHz, GDDR5 (Micron), ForceWare 373.06
Memoria
8192 MB 
, 2x 4 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, Dual-Channel, 2/2 slots occupati
Schermo
17.3 pollici 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, G-Sync, Full HD, 75 Hz, lucido: no
Scheda madre
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Harddisk
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB 
, SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2, 1x 2.5-inch
Scheda audio
Realtek High Definition Audio
Porte di connessione
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: 2x 3.5 mm jack (cuffie, microfono), Lettore schede: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Sensore luminosità
Rete
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 33 x 416 x 279
Batteria
95 Wh, 8300 mAh
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Altre caratteristiche
Casse: 2.0 (Bang & Olufsen Audio), Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Alimentatore: 230 Watts, Accessori: guida rapida, brochures, Software: molti tools HP, McAfee LiveSafe Trial, MS Office 365 Trial, 24 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
3.25 kg, Alimentazione: 808 gr
Prezzo
1800 Euro

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Nexoc G734III
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76.4 MB/s ∼99% +1%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼99%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
70 MB/s ∼91% -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.8 MB/s ∼31% -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼97%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼96% -1%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼96% -1%
Nexoc G734III
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼96% -1%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.6 MB/s ∼31% -68%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s ∼100%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
575 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
566 MBit/s ∼84% -16%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
512.058 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
440 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
536.301 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼99%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
465 MBit/s ∼87% -12%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
450 MBit/s ∼84% -15%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
446 MBit/s ∼83% -16%
339
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 362 cd/m² Media: 342.3 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 87 %
Al centro con la batteria: 362 cd/m²
Contrasto: 1168:1 (Nero: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.48 | - Ø
84% sRGB (Argyll) 55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.23
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-w010ng
AUO119B, 3840x2160
Nexoc G734III
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080
MSI GS73VR 6RF
1920x1080
Gigabyte P57X v6
LGD0469, 1920x1080
Asus G752VS-XB78K
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080
Response Times
-25%
4%
42%
1%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37
49
-32%
36
3%
28
24%
33.6
9%
38
-3%
Response Time Black / White *
24
28
-17%
23
4%
9.6
60%
25.6
-7%
22
8%
PWM Frequency
50
Screen
-4%
0%
13%
-12%
4%
Brightness
342
312
-9%
308
-10%
315
-8%
321
-6%
317
-7%
Brightness Distribution
87
90
3%
92
6%
86
-1%
93
7%
88
1%
Black Level *
0.31
0.29
6%
0.28
10%
0.308
1%
0.267
14%
0.3
3%
Contrast
1168
1090
-7%
1121
-4%
1095
-6%
1233
6%
1093
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
5.69
-26%
4.17
7%
2.96
34%
5.93
-32%
3.74
17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.48
6.12
-76%
3.84
-10%
2.57
26%
6.72
-93%
2.67
23%
Gamma
2.23 108%
2.56 94%
2.41 100%
2.25 107%
2.12 113%
2.41 100%
CCT
6144 106%
5875 111%
6950 94%
7114 91%
7611 85%
6861 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
87
58%
56
2%
74.3
35%
57
4%
56
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
84
100
19%
86
2%
100
19%
87
4%
85
1%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
-15% / -8%
2% / 1%
28% / 18%
-6% / -9%
4% / 4%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Outdoor use sunshine
Outdoor use sunshine
Outdoor use shade
Outdoor use shade

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti poccono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con rempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms Incremento
↘ 20 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra buoni tempi di risposta durante i nostri tests, ma potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers competitivi.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms Incremento
↘ 24 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4402 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC-Latency
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
160 Points ∼100% +8%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼93%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
145 Points ∼91% -2%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼88% -5%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼88% -5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼84% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
789 Points ∼100% +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼86%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
677 Points ∼86% 0%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼86% 0%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼85% -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points ∼80% -6%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.77 Points ∼100% +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points ∼95%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points ∼95% -1%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.62 Points ∼92% -4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼85% -11%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼85% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.63 Points ∼100% +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼87%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.45 Points ∼86% 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.44 Points ∼86% 0%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.41 Points ∼86% -1%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.37 Points ∼85% -1%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7881 Points ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7206 Points ∼91%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
30656 Points ∼100% +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
26510 Points ∼86%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
269.16 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
251.96 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK (EDGE: 25.10586.0.0)
247.56 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
230.83 Points ∼86% -14%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
116.08 Points ∼43% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK (EDGE: 25.10586.0.0)
37923 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
37205 Points ∼98%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
33508 Points ∼88% -10%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
18466 Points ∼49% -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
1904.4 ms * ∼100% -78%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1811.2 ms * ∼95% -70%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
1067.1 ms * ∼56%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK (EDGE: 25.10586.0.0)
966.3 ms * ∼51% +9%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
3423
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20283
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5484
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
3426 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
26510 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7206 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
69.92 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.69 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
679 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
148 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
112.59 fps
Aiuto
PCMark 7 - Score
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
6803 Points ∼100% +22%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
5637 Points ∼83% +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5556 Points ∼82%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5233 Points ∼77% -6%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5778 Points ∼100% +7%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points ∼93%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points ∼87% -7%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5011 Points ∼87% -7%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points ∼83% -11%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4054 Points ∼70% -25%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
8531 Points ∼100% +20%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
7128 Points ∼84%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5262 Points ∼62% -26%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5192 Points ∼61% -27%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
5062 Points ∼59% -29%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4678 Points ∼55% -34%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5575 Points ∼100% +15%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼87%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points ∼75% -13%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4180 Points ∼75% -14%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points ∼72% -17%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3309 Points ∼59% -32%
PCMark 7 Score
5556 punti
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4833 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7128 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5394 punti
Aiuto
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Nexoc G734III
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
20%
99%
-45%
-30%
126%
Write 4k QD32
295.3
348.3
18%
382.4
29%
167.1
-43%
274.9
-7%
578
96%
Read 4k QD32
600.2
621.6
4%
603
0%
251.6
-58%
273.9
-54%
743.9
24%
Write 4k
153.3
137.2
-11%
142.06
-7%
42.51
-72%
84.59
-45%
154.4
1%
Read 4k
42.7
41.42
-3%
51.03
20%
20.3
-52%
25.93
-39%
44.42
4%
Write 512
294.7
428.3
45%
1199
307%
254.4
-14%
314.4
7%
1438
388%
Read 512
616.2
605.8
-2%
870.6
41%
242.3
-61%
303.1
-51%
1250
103%
Write Seq
294.9
582.7
98%
1283
335%
319
8%
315.4
7%
1305
343%
Read Seq
1156
1234
7%
1917
66%
334.3
-71%
481.7
-58%
1718
49%
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Valore Minimo di trasferimento: 70.7 MB/s
Valore Massimo di trasferimento: 140.2 MB/s
Valore Medio di trasferimento: 111.6 MB/s
Tempi di accesso: 15.8 ms
Burst Rate: 263 MB/s
Utilizzo CPU: 3.6 %
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16757 Points ∼100% +6%
Nexoc G734III
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16219 Points ∼97% +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
15806 Points ∼94%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11506 Points ∼69% -27%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
5863 Points ∼35% -63%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
92468 Points ∼100% +7%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
86780 Points ∼94%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
79578 Points ∼86% -8%
Nexoc G734III
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
74477 Points ∼81% -14%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
67791 Points ∼73% -22%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
34679 Points ∼38% -60%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23356 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22282 Points ∼95% +8%
Nexoc G734III
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
20881 Points ∼89% +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
20656 Points ∼88%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14904 Points ∼64% -28%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
7903 Points ∼34% -62%
3DMark 11 Performance
14116 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
107777 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22908 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
11779 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
6894 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score
4729 punti
Aiuto
The Witcher 3
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
34.8 (min: 28) fps ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
34 (min: 28) fps ∼98%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
57 (min: 47) fps ∼100% +12%
Nexoc G734III
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
53.2 fps ∼93% +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
50.8 (min: 41) fps ∼89%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
38 (min: 34) fps ∼100% +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
36.1 (min: 32) fps ∼95%
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
92.8 (min: 80) fps ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
90 fps ∼97% 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
89.7 (min: 80) fps ∼97%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
61.4 fps ∼66% -32%
basso medio alto ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 197.1171161103.8fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 196.315094.850.834fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 173151.7105.689.736.1fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 86.474.966.139.222.8fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 10793837937fps
Doom (2016) 147.5140.1125.7116.649.8fps
No Man's Sky (2016) 118.6114.510448.743.3fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 72.370.243.219fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 176.3159.5118.9110.145.7fps

Rumorosità

Idle
33 / 34 / 35 dB(A)
HDD
34 dB(A)
Sotto carico
45 / 52 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 30 dB(A)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w010ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M
Nexoc G734III
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Noise
3%
2%
3%
0%
7%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.4
5%
29.7
1%
30
-0%
Idle Minimum *
33
32
3%
31
6%
31.9
3%
33.2
-1%
31
6%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
32
6%
32
6%
33.2
2%
32
6%
Idle Maximum *
35
34
3%
33
6%
34
3%
33.2
5%
33
6%
Load Average *
45
41
9%
49
-9%
47
-4%
47.5
-6%
40
11%
Load Maximum *
52
51
2%
50
4%
49.4
5%
52.5
-1%
47
10%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Stress test: FurMark + Prime95
Stress test: FurMark + Prime95
Stress test: only Prime95
Stress test: only Prime95
Stress test: only FurMark
Stress test: only FurMark
Carico massimo
 45 °C41.3 °C43.4 °C 
 41.1 °C42 °C37.5 °C 
 29.8 °C28.7 °C29.1 °C 
Massima: 45 °C
Media: 37.5 °C
48.3 °C51.9 °C54.3 °C
32.3 °C41.4 °C42 °C
27.5 °C31.5 °C25.7 °C
Massima: 54.3 °C
Media: 39.4 °C
Alimentazione (max)  38.4 °C | Temperatura della stanza 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w010ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M
Nexoc G734III
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Heat
1%
-4%
-4%
-18%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
45
50.2
-12%
50
-11%
50.8
-13%
59
-31%
42.9
5%
Maximum Bottom *
54.3
54.1
-0%
60.5
-11%
60
-10%
66
-22%
41.5
24%
Idle Upper Side *
29.6
28.9
2%
29.1
2%
27.4
7%
33.2
-12%
31.6
-7%
Idle Bottom *
28.6
24.3
15%
26.9
6%
28.8
-1%
30.6
-7%
29.5
-3%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

You can use the software to …
You can use the software to …
… adjust the sound to your own preferences.
… adjust the sound to your own preferences.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.942.22534.836.93127.730.14032.740.65028.630.46326.427.68029.530.810026.131.412524.627.916022.336.520023.755.325022.662.331520.563.240019.562.550019.262.96301967.880018.668.910001868.4125018.363.916001970.5200018.171.1250018.268.8315018.470.6400018.374.7500018.474.5630018.577.8800018.6751000018.678.81250018.5761600018.665.7SPL30.885N1.562.2median 18.6HP Omen 17-w110ngmedian 68.4Delta1.66.643.943.736.635.230.130.332.638.131.634.529.941.530.947.829.550.9255322.758.922.568.521.769.720.771.820.27719.875.419.471.418.972.319.472.619.2712067.318.96818.474.718.473.618.166.518.365.618.468.118.46418.462.318.56118.555.831.183.11.560.7median 19.2Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LGmedian 68.11.64.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 19 / 25 / 31 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 90 / 193 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w010ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M
Nexoc G734III
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
27%
11%
-14%
-16%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
19
10
47%
13
32%
22.6
-19%
18.4
3%
24
-26%
Idle Average *
25
19
24%
20
20%
32.7
-31%
22.8
9%
31
-24%
Idle Maximum *
31
25
19%
27
13%
32.8
-6%
24
23%
36
-16%
Load Average *
90
83
8%
90
-0%
114.7
-27%
175.5
-95%
94
-4%
Load Maximum *
193
118
39%
210
-9%
167.9
13%
229.5
-19%
204
-6%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

The 95-Wh battery …
The 95-Wh battery …
… is inside the chassis.
… is inside the chassis.
Autonomia della batteria
Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)
7ore 12minuti
Navigazione WiFi v1.3 (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
4ore 07minuti
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3ore 53minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)
1ore 55minuti
HP Omen 17-w110ng
95 Wh
HP Omen 17-w010ng
62 Wh
Nexoc G734III
60 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
65 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v6
75.81 Wh
Asus G752VS-XB78K
90 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
-11%
-16%
-25%
-11%
-23%
Reader / Idle
432
435
1%
400
-7%
353
-18%
418
-3%
311
-28%
Load
115
76
-34%
95
-17%
66
-43%
103
-10%
84
-27%
WiFi v1.3
247
240
-3%
177
-28%
213
-14%
201
-19%
210
-15%
H.264
233
214
-8%
208
-11%
186
-20%

Pro

+ Display IPS (ampi angoli di visuale e contrasto elevato)
+ nessun bleeding, né PWM
+ buon rapporto prezzo-performance
+ supporto G-Sync
+ Veloce NVMe-SSD
+ bella l'illuminazione della tastiera
+ elevate prestazioni gaming
+ 8 GB di VRAM
+ processore veloce
+ design sottile e bello
+ accettabile autonomia

Contro

- manca l'USB 3.1 Gen. 2
- touchpad sembra troppo economico
- manutenzione complicata
- manca il drive ottico
- batteria integrata
In review: HP Omen 17-w110ng. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: HP Omen 17-w110ng. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

Molte persone pensano ad un portatile business quando sentono HP, ma la serie Omen rappresenta il versante gaming di HP. Il nostro modello di test Omen 17-w110ng rispecchia le attese per un portatile gaming. Gli utenti avranno una potente combinazione CPU/GPU in uno chassis stiloso, ma in plastica e senza drive ottico. L'assenza di tale drive non è un punto chiave se si considerano piattaforme gaming come Steam, dove potete scaricare i vostri giochi.

Un po' più discutibile è la selezione di porte con appena tre porte USB 3.0. Avremmo voluto almeno una porta USB 3.1 Gen.2 con connettore Type-C. HP dovrebbe dare inoltre un altro sguardo ai dispositivi di input. Parliamo del touchpad in particolare, che dà l'impressione di essere economico per questa fascia di prezzo. Le dimensioni non sono perfette, in quanto appena 6,5 sono un po' pochi.

Considerando il tutto, l'HP Omen 17-w110ng è un buon pacchetto ad un prezzo onesto. Le prestazioni di questo sistema gaming non meritano critiche. Il portatile gira molto bene, e potete giocare senza alcun limite.

Il pacchetto complessivo è convincente, nonostante le citate pecche. Le performance sono molto buone, e ed il dispositivo è realizzato per i gamers, il che è supportato dai risultati dei nostri tests. Il veloce Intel Core i7-6700HQ fornisce prestazioni sufficienti per tutte le applicazioni, ed anche per i giochi più pesanti che possono essere usati in FHD (a volte anche 4K) grazie alla Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070. Anche il prezzo è interessante con 1800 Euro. Dispositivi simile della concorrenza spesso hanno prezzi tra 2000-2500 Euro, quindi la serie Omen HP dovrebbe in definitiva essere sulla vostra short list.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

HP Omen 17-w110ng - 10/26/2016 v5.1
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
76 / 98 → 78%
Tastiera
77%
Dispositivo di puntamento
72%
Connettività
59 / 81 → 73%
Peso
55 / 66 → 80%
Batteria
74%
Display
87%
Prestazioni di gioco
94%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
93%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 89%
Rumorosità
67 / 90 → 74%
Audio
70%
Fotocamera
69 / 85 → 81%
Media
75%
82%
Gaming - Media ponderata

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Recensioni e prove de portatili e telefoni cellulari > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione breve del Portatile HP Omen 17 (i7-6700HQ, GTX 1070)
Sebastian Bade, 2016-11- 6 (Update: 2016-11- 6)